Leaderboard github.com

zainzafar90/call-of-duty-phadda

View repository ↗
JavaScript
★ 0
commit 85636f70308c
scored 2026-11-14
scoring prov-5+qual-2+sec-2

AI provenance

possible

Confidence: 41%
Coverage: 100%

Estimated share of AI-generated code. Explicit attribution is a lower bound.

Code quality

44/100

poor

Confidence: 90%
Coverage: 100%

Complexity, duplication, lint density, tests, CI, docs and review process.

Security

78/100

adequate

Confidence: 85%
Coverage: 100%

Secrets, static analysis, vulnerable dependencies, CI and supply-chain posture.

Dispute or request a re-score Full report JSON

AI provenance

0% possible

Weak signals consistent with AI-assisted development.

How the score is built

Explicitly attributed share0%
Unattributed share in AI-pace bursts0%
Estimated AI-generated share0%
AI tool configuration files1
Work sessions at AI pace0
Releases at AI pacenot measured
Coding-style index (1.0+ means possible)0.03

Lines added per month all AI-attributed share

2026-0737,989 · 0% AI

Evidence by analyzer

Explicit AI attributionok

attributed_commit_share: 0.0%
attributed_commits: 0
attributed_loc: 0
attributed_loc_share: 0.0%
commits: 4
effective_loc: 37,989
tools_detected: 0

AI tool configurationok1 item

.claude/launch.json (claude-code configuration)

artifacts: 1
earliest_adoption: 2026-07-27
tools_configured: 1
workflow_agents: 0

Commit velocityok

excluded_import_loc: 37,989
flagged_loc: 0
flagged_loc_share: 0.0%
flagged_units: 0
max_loc_per_hour: 0
measured_loc: 0
median_loc_per_hour: 0
pr_timed_units: 0
pre_ai_era_burst_loc: 0
pre_ai_era_bursts: 0
pre_ai_era_measured_loc: 0
work_units: 0

Release velocityskipped

Coding styleok1 item

step-by-step narration comment: // then, by construction, "the key the geometry around the muzzle is receiving".

count:assistant_voice: 0
count:emoji_in_code: 0
count:narrated_steps: 1
count:placeholder: 0
files:assistant_voice: 0
files:emoji_in_code: 0
files:narrated_steps: 1
files:placeholder: 0
index: 0.03
lines_scanned: 37,989
per_kloc:assistant_voice: 0
per_kloc:emoji_in_code: 0
per_kloc:narrated_steps: 0.03
per_kloc:placeholder: 0

Code quality

44 poor

Code quality is poor: test-to-source ratio 0.00, no CI test run detected; 41% of function code in complex or long functions; 1% duplicated lines. Weakest area: testing.

How the score is built

Complexity29
Duplication95
Lint and smells87
Tests and CI0
Documentation40
Type safetynot measured
Review processnot measured

Evidence by analyzer

Complexity (lizard)ok10 items

complex_functions: 91
function_nloc: 22,766
functions: 1,578
long_functions: 31
many_param_functions: 37
mean_ccn: 4.61
p90_ccn: 10
risky_nloc_share: 40.8%

Duplication (jscpd)ok8 items

compared_lines: 32,169
duplicated_lines: 285
duplicated_share: 0.9%
files: 30

Lintok

category:correctness: 85
findings: 85
scanned_lines: 37,989
weighted_findings: 21.25

Tests and CIok

check:ci_present: no
check:ci_runs_lint: no
check:ci_runs_tests: no
check:has_tests: no
check:test_ratio: no
check:tests_cochange: no
ci_files: 0
cochange_commits: 3
cochange_share: 0.0%
source_lines: 37,989
test_lines: 0
test_ratio: 0

Documentationok1 item

README.md README.md

check:changelog: no
check:contributing: no
check:license: no
check:readme: yes
readme_lines: 17

Type safetyskipped

Security

78 adequate

Security posture is adequate: 7 known vulnerabilities in 3 dependencies. Weakest area: posture.

How the score is built

Secrets100
Static analysis (SAST)100
Vulnerable dependencies67
CI workflowsnot measured
Security posture0
OpenSSF Scorecardnot measured

Evidence by analyzer

OpenSSF Scorecardskipped

no published OpenSSF Scorecard result for this repo

Package registriesok

checked: 6
declared: 6
lookup_errors: 0
missing: 0
recent: 0

Secrets (gitleaks)ok

secrets_current: 0
secrets_history: 0
secrets_low_confidence: 0
secrets_nonprod: 0

Static analysis (opengrep)ok

findings: 3
findings_high: 0
findings_low: 3
findings_medium: 0
parse_errors: 1
scanned_lines: 37,989
weighted_findings: 0.19

Dependencies (osv-scanner)ok

penalty: 24
vulnerabilities: 7
vulnerable_packages: 3
vulns_critical: 0
vulns_high: 3
vulns_low: 1
vulns_medium: 3
vulns_unknown: 0

CI workflows (zizmor)skipped

Security postureok

check:dependency_updates: no
check:lockfiles: yes
check:security_policy: no
check:signed_commits: no
signed_commit_share: 0.0%
unpinned_manifests: 0

Release downloadsok

binary_assets: 0
signals: 0
suspicious: 0

Findings

3 high3 medium89 low

Severity	Rule	Location	Message	Tool
high	`osv/GHSA-2v37-7h3g-55p8`	pnpm-lock.yaml	[email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-2v37-7h3g-55p8	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
high	`osv/GHSA-587h-7wmj-h5pm`	pnpm-lock.yaml	[email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-587h-7wmj-h5pm	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
high	`osv/GHSA-68fv-2mgg-jv7q`	pnpm-lock.yaml	[email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-68fv-2mgg-jv7q	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
medium	`osv/GHSA-698v-4r3x-3vcv`	pnpm-lock.yaml	[email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-698v-4r3x-3vcv	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
medium	`osv/GHSA-r825-w8mm-5pxw`	pnpm-lock.yaml	[email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-r825-w8mm-5pxw	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
medium	`osv/GHSA-rq7h-c2jc-7f22`	pnpm-lock.yaml	[email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-rq7h-c2jc-7f22	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
low	`opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.missing-template-string-indicator`	.qa/critic-loop.js:197	This looks like a JavaScript template string. Are you missing a '$' in front of '{...}'?	Lint
low	`opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.missing-template-string-indicator`	.qa/critic-loop.js:197	This looks like a JavaScript template string. Are you missing a '$' in front of '{...}'?	Lint
low	`opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.missing-template-string-indicator`	.qa/critic-loop.js:197	This looks like a JavaScript template string. Are you missing a '$' in front of '{...}'?	Lint
low	`opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.missing-template-string-indicator`	.qa/critic-loop.js:199	This looks like a JavaScript template string. Are you missing a '$' in front of '{...}'?	Lint
low	`opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.missing-template-string-indicator`	src/core/materials.js:2857	This looks like a JavaScript template string. Are you missing a '$' in front of '{...}'?	Lint
low	`opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.missing-template-string-indicator`	src/core/materials.js:2857	This looks like a JavaScript template string. Are you missing a '$' in front of '{...}'?	Lint
low	`opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.missing-template-string-indicator`	src/core/materials.js:2873	This looks like a JavaScript template string. Are you missing a '$' in front of '{...}'?	Lint
low	`opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.missing-template-string-indicator`	src/core/materials.js:2873	This looks like a JavaScript template string. Are you missing a '$' in front of '{...}'?	Lint
low	`opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.missing-template-string-indicator`	src/core/materials.js:2957	This looks like a JavaScript template string. Are you missing a '$' in front of '{...}'?	Lint
low	`opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.missing-template-string-indicator`	src/core/materials.js:2957	This looks like a JavaScript template string. Are you missing a '$' in front of '{...}'?	Lint
low	`opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.missing-template-string-indicator`	src/core/materials.js:2998	This looks like a JavaScript template string. Are you missing a '$' in front of '{...}'?	Lint
low	`opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.missing-template-string-indicator`	src/core/materials.js:2998	This looks like a JavaScript template string. Are you missing a '$' in front of '{...}'?	Lint
low	`opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.missing-template-string-indicator`	src/core/materials.js:3018	This looks like a JavaScript template string. Are you missing a '$' in front of '{...}'?	Lint
low	`opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.missing-template-string-indicator`	src/core/materials.js:3018	This looks like a JavaScript template string. Are you missing a '$' in front of '{...}'?	Lint
low	`opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.missing-template-string-indicator`	src/core/materials.js:3086	This looks like a JavaScript template string. Are you missing a '$' in front of '{...}'?	Lint
low	`opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.missing-template-string-indicator`	src/core/materials.js:3086	This looks like a JavaScript template string. Are you missing a '$' in front of '{...}'?	Lint
low	`opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.missing-template-string-indicator`	src/core/postfx.js:1174	This looks like a JavaScript template string. Are you missing a '$' in front of '{...}'?	Lint
low	`opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.missing-template-string-indicator`	src/core/postfx.js:1174	This looks like a JavaScript template string. Are you missing a '$' in front of '{...}'?	Lint
low	`opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.missing-template-string-indicator`	src/core/postfx.js:1256	This looks like a JavaScript template string. Are you missing a '$' in front of '{...}'?	Lint
low	`opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.missing-template-string-indicator`	src/core/postfx.js:1256	This looks like a JavaScript template string. Are you missing a '$' in front of '{...}'?	Lint
low	`opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.missing-template-string-indicator`	src/core/postfx.js:1261	This looks like a JavaScript template string. Are you missing a '$' in front of '{...}'?	Lint
low	`opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.missing-template-string-indicator`	src/core/postfx.js:1261	This looks like a JavaScript template string. Are you missing a '$' in front of '{...}'?	Lint
low	`opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.missing-template-string-indicator`	src/core/postfx.js:1441	This looks like a JavaScript template string. Are you missing a '$' in front of '{...}'?	Lint
low	`opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.missing-template-string-indicator`	src/core/postfx.js:1441	This looks like a JavaScript template string. Are you missing a '$' in front of '{...}'?	Lint
low	`opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.missing-template-string-indicator`	src/core/postfx.js:1514	This looks like a JavaScript template string. Are you missing a '$' in front of '{...}'?	Lint
low	`opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.missing-template-string-indicator`	src/core/postfx.js:1514	This looks like a JavaScript template string. Are you missing a '$' in front of '{...}'?	Lint
low	`opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.missing-template-string-indicator`	src/core/postfx.js:1629	This looks like a JavaScript template string. Are you missing a '$' in front of '{...}'?	Lint
low	`opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.missing-template-string-indicator`	src/core/postfx.js:1629	This looks like a JavaScript template string. Are you missing a '$' in front of '{...}'?	Lint
low	`opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.missing-template-string-indicator`	src/core/postfx.js:635	This looks like a JavaScript template string. Are you missing a '$' in front of '{...}'?	Lint
low	`opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.missing-template-string-indicator`	src/core/postfx.js:635	This looks like a JavaScript template string. Are you missing a '$' in front of '{...}'?	Lint
low	`opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.missing-template-string-indicator`	src/core/postfx.js:847	This looks like a JavaScript template string. Are you missing a '$' in front of '{...}'?	Lint
low	`opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.missing-template-string-indicator`	src/core/postfx.js:847	This looks like a JavaScript template string. Are you missing a '$' in front of '{...}'?	Lint
low	`opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.missing-template-string-indicator`	src/core/postfx.js:884	This looks like a JavaScript template string. Are you missing a '$' in front of '{...}'?	Lint
low	`opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.missing-template-string-indicator`	src/core/postfx.js:884	This looks like a JavaScript template string. Are you missing a '$' in front of '{...}'?	Lint
low	`opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.missing-template-string-indicator`	src/core/postfx.js:915	This looks like a JavaScript template string. Are you missing a '$' in front of '{...}'?	Lint
low	`opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.missing-template-string-indicator`	src/core/postfx.js:915	This looks like a JavaScript template string. Are you missing a '$' in front of '{...}'?	Lint
low	`opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.missing-template-string-indicator`	src/core/sky.js:1079	This looks like a JavaScript template string. Are you missing a '$' in front of '{...}'?	Lint
low	`opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.missing-template-string-indicator`	src/core/sky.js:1217	This looks like a JavaScript template string. Are you missing a '$' in front of '{...}'?	Lint
low	`opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.missing-template-string-indicator`	src/core/sky.js:274	This looks like a JavaScript template string. Are you missing a '$' in front of '{...}'?	Lint
low	`opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.missing-template-string-indicator`	src/core/sky.js:399	This looks like a JavaScript template string. Are you missing a '$' in front of '{...}'?	Lint
low	`opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.missing-template-string-indicator`	src/core/sky.js:399	This looks like a JavaScript template string. Are you missing a '$' in front of '{...}'?	Lint
low	`opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.missing-template-string-indicator`	src/core/sky.js:498	This looks like a JavaScript template string. Are you missing a '$' in front of '{...}'?	Lint
low	`opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.missing-template-string-indicator`	src/core/sky.js:498	This looks like a JavaScript template string. Are you missing a '$' in front of '{...}'?	Lint
low	`opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.useless-assignment`	src/core/sky.js:884	`data[p++]` is assigned twice; the first assignment is useless	Lint
low	`opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.useless-assignment`	src/core/sky.js:885	`data[p++]` is assigned twice; the first assignment is useless	Lint
low	`opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.useless-assignment`	src/core/sky.js:886	`data[p++]` is assigned twice; the first assignment is useless	Lint
low	`opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.useless-assignment`	src/core/sky.js:925	`data[p++]` is assigned twice; the first assignment is useless	Lint
low	`opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.useless-assignment`	src/core/sky.js:926	`data[p++]` is assigned twice; the first assignment is useless	Lint
low	`opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.useless-assignment`	src/core/sky.js:927	`data[p++]` is assigned twice; the first assignment is useless	Lint
low	`opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.missing-template-string-indicator`	src/core/sky.js:944	This looks like a JavaScript template string. Are you missing a '$' in front of '{...}'?	Lint
low	`opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.missing-template-string-indicator`	src/core/sky.js:944	This looks like a JavaScript template string. Are you missing a '$' in front of '{...}'?	Lint
low	`opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.missing-template-string-indicator`	src/core/sky.js:957	This looks like a JavaScript template string. Are you missing a '$' in front of '{...}'?	Lint
low	`opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.missing-template-string-indicator`	src/core/sky.js:957	This looks like a JavaScript template string. Are you missing a '$' in front of '{...}'?	Lint
low	`opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.missing-template-string-indicator`	src/fx/index.js:1030	This looks like a JavaScript template string. Are you missing a '$' in front of '{...}'?	Lint
low	`opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.missing-template-string-indicator`	src/fx/index.js:1030	This looks like a JavaScript template string. Are you missing a '$' in front of '{...}'?	Lint
low	`opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.missing-template-string-indicator`	src/fx/index.js:606	This looks like a JavaScript template string. Are you missing a '$' in front of '{...}'?	Lint
low	`opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.missing-template-string-indicator`	src/fx/index.js:606	This looks like a JavaScript template string. Are you missing a '$' in front of '{...}'?	Lint
low	`opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.missing-template-string-indicator`	src/fx/index.js:735	This looks like a JavaScript template string. Are you missing a '$' in front of '{...}'?	Lint
low	`opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.missing-template-string-indicator`	src/fx/index.js:735	This looks like a JavaScript template string. Are you missing a '$' in front of '{...}'?	Lint
low	`opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.missing-template-string-indicator`	src/fx/index.js:875	This looks like a JavaScript template string. Are you missing a '$' in front of '{...}'?	Lint
low	`opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.missing-template-string-indicator`	src/fx/index.js:875	This looks like a JavaScript template string. Are you missing a '$' in front of '{...}'?	Lint
low	`opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.missing-template-string-indicator`	src/fx/index.js:895	This looks like a JavaScript template string. Are you missing a '$' in front of '{...}'?	Lint
low	`opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.missing-template-string-indicator`	src/fx/index.js:895	This looks like a JavaScript template string. Are you missing a '$' in front of '{...}'?	Lint
low	`opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.useless-assignment`	src/fx/index.js:969	`idx[ii++]` is assigned twice; the first assignment is useless	Lint
low	`opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.useless-assignment`	src/fx/index.js:969	`idx[ii++]` is assigned twice; the first assignment is useless	Lint
low	`opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.useless-assignment`	src/fx/index.js:969	`idx[ii++]` is assigned twice; the first assignment is useless	Lint
low	`opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.useless-assignment`	src/fx/index.js:970	`idx[ii++]` is assigned twice; the first assignment is useless	Lint
low	`opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.useless-assignment`	src/fx/index.js:970	`idx[ii++]` is assigned twice; the first assignment is useless	Lint
low	`opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.missing-template-string-indicator`	src/fx/index.js:982	This looks like a JavaScript template string. Are you missing a '$' in front of '{...}'?	Lint
low	`opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.missing-template-string-indicator`	src/fx/index.js:982	This looks like a JavaScript template string. Are you missing a '$' in front of '{...}'?	Lint
low	`opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.missing-template-string-indicator`	src/ui/hud.js:87	This looks like a JavaScript template string. Are you missing a '$' in front of '{...}'?	Lint
low	`opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.missing-template-string-indicator`	src/ui/hud.js:87	This looks like a JavaScript template string. Are you missing a '$' in front of '{...}'?	Lint
low	`opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.missing-template-string-indicator`	src/ui/menu.js:58	This looks like a JavaScript template string. Are you missing a '$' in front of '{...}'?	Lint
low	`opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.missing-template-string-indicator`	src/ui/menu.js:58	This looks like a JavaScript template string. Are you missing a '$' in front of '{...}'?	Lint
low	`opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.useless-assignment`	src/weapons/index.js:2973	`NADE.arcPos[n++]` is assigned twice; the first assignment is useless	Lint
low	`opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.useless-assignment`	src/weapons/index.js:2973	`NADE.arcPos[n++]` is assigned twice; the first assignment is useless	Lint
low	`opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.useless-assignment`	src/weapons/index.js:408	`idx[o++]` is assigned twice; the first assignment is useless	Lint
low	`opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.useless-assignment`	src/weapons/index.js:408	`idx[o++]` is assigned twice; the first assignment is useless	Lint
low	`opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.useless-assignment`	src/weapons/index.js:408	`idx[o++]` is assigned twice; the first assignment is useless	Lint
low	`opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.useless-assignment`	src/weapons/index.js:409	`idx[o++]` is assigned twice; the first assignment is useless	Lint
low	`opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.useless-assignment`	src/weapons/index.js:409	`idx[o++]` is assigned twice; the first assignment is useless	Lint
low	`opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.missing-template-string-indicator`	src/world/decals.js:573	This looks like a JavaScript template string. Are you missing a '$' in front of '{...}'?	Lint
low	`opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.missing-template-string-indicator`	src/world/decals.js:573	This looks like a JavaScript template string. Are you missing a '$' in front of '{...}'?	Lint
low	`opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.missing-template-string-indicator`	src/world/decals.js:602	This looks like a JavaScript template string. Are you missing a '$' in front of '{...}'?	Lint
low	`opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.missing-template-string-indicator`	src/world/decals.js:602	This looks like a JavaScript template string. Are you missing a '$' in front of '{...}'?	Lint
low	`osv/GHSA-9jrq-w75r-8gcw`	pnpm-lock.yaml	[email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-9jrq-w75r-8gcw	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
low	`opengrep/javascript.lang.security.audit.unsafe-formatstring`	src/core/kernel.js:15	Detected string concatenation with a non-literal variable in a util.format / console.log function. If an attacker injects a format specifier in the string, it will forge the log message. Try to use constant values for the format string....	Static analysis (opengrep)
low	`opengrep/javascript.lang.security.audit.unsafe-formatstring`	src/main.js:61	Detected string concatenation with a non-literal variable in a util.format / console.log function. If an attacker injects a format specifier in the string, it will forge the log message. Try to use constant values for the format string....	Static analysis (opengrep)
low	`opengrep/javascript.lang.security.audit.unsafe-formatstring`	src/main.js:93	Detected string concatenation with a non-literal variable in a util.format / console.log function. If an attacker injects a format specifier in the string, it will forge the log message. Try to use constant values for the format string....	Static analysis (opengrep)

Tools and coverage

Every analyzer that ran on this commit. A failed or skipped tool is a coverage gap: its share of the score is left out and the coverage figure drops.

Analyzer	Pillar	Status	Version	Findings	Note
AI tool configuration	AI provenance	ok	`signatures-v1`	0
Explicit AI attribution	AI provenance	ok	`signatures-v1`	0
Release velocity	AI provenance	skipped	`—`	0
Coding style	AI provenance	ok	`—`	0
Commit velocity	AI provenance	ok	`prov-4`	0
Complexity (lizard)	Code quality	ok	`lizard 1.25.1`	0
Documentation	Code quality	ok	`—`	0
Duplication (jscpd)	Code quality	ok	`repotrust-dup-w6`	0
Lint	Code quality	ok	`opengrep 1.33.1; rules f1d2b562b414`	85
Tests and CI	Code quality	ok	`—`	0
Type safety	Code quality	skipped	`—`	0
CI workflows (zizmor)	Security	skipped	`—`	0
Dependencies (osv-scanner)	Security	ok	`osv-scanner version: 2.7.1`	7
Release downloads	Security	ok	`—`	0
Security posture	Security	ok	`—`	0
Package registries	Security	ok	`—`	0
Static analysis (opengrep)	Security	ok	`opengrep 1.33.1; rules f1d2b562b414`	3
OpenSSF Scorecard	Security	skipped	`—`	0	no published OpenSSF Scorecard result for this repo
Secrets (gitleaks)	Security	ok	`gitleaks 8.30.1`	0

Score history

Scores from different scoring versions aren't directly comparable.

Scored	Commit	Scoring	AI provenance	Quality	Security
2026-11-14	`85636f70308c`	`prov-5+qual-2+sec-2`	0%	44	78
2026-11-14	`85636f70308c`	`prov-4+qual-2+sec-2`	0%	44	78

Embed a badge

Maintainers can show these in a README. Badges update when the repository is re-scored.

[![RepoTrust ai](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/badge/github.com/zainzafar90/call-of-duty-phadda/ai.svg)](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/r/github.com/zainzafar90/call-of-duty-phadda/)

[![RepoTrust quality](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/badge/github.com/zainzafar90/call-of-duty-phadda/quality.svg)](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/r/github.com/zainzafar90/call-of-duty-phadda/)

[![RepoTrust security](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/badge/github.com/zainzafar90/call-of-duty-phadda/security.svg)](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/r/github.com/zainzafar90/call-of-duty-phadda/)

Full text report

Repository: https://github.com/zainzafar90/call-of-duty-phadda
Commit: 85636f70308cb2c74eaaa1ef1f9bd44372563bd1
Generated: 2026-11-14T14:52:08+00:00
Scorer 0.1.0, scoring prov-5+qual-2+sec-2, report schema v2

Scores

Pillar	Score	Signal	Confidence	Coverage
AI provenance (estimated AI-generated share)	0	possible	41%	100%
Code quality	44	poor	90%	100%
Security	78	adequate	85%	100%

AI provenance

Weak signals consistent with AI-assisted development.

Explicitly attributed share (lower bound): 0.0%
Unattributed share in AI-consistent velocity bursts: 0.0%
Estimated AI-generated share: 0.0%
AI tooling configured in repo: claude-code
Stylometry index: 0.03 per 1,000 lines (narrated steps 1, placeholders 0, assistant phrasing 0, emoji 0). Reported as a signal, not scored.

Month	Lines added	Attributed to AI
2026-07	37,989	0%

Evidence

.claude/launch.json (claude-code configuration) (.claude/laun)
step-by-step narration comment: // then, by construction, "the key the geometry around the muzzle is receiving". (src/core/lig)

AI provenance describes how code was produced; it is not a quality judgment. Unless attribution is explicit, these are signals consistent with AI generation, not proof. Squash/rebase workflows, imported code, and rewritten history reduce accuracy.

Code quality

Code quality is poor: test-to-source ratio 0.00, no CI test run detected; 41% of function code in complex or long functions; 1% duplicated lines. Weakest area: testing.

Area	Score
Complexity (lizard)	29
Duplication	95
Code smells (Opengrep)	87
Tests and CI	0
Documentation	40
Type safety	n/a
Process (Scorecard review/maintenance)	n/a

Functions: 1,578; mean complexity 4.6, 90th percentile 10; 91 complex and 31 long functions
Duplicated lines: 0.9% of 32,169 compared
Tests: 0 test lines for 37,989 source lines (ratio 0.00); CI test commands: none detected; 0% of recent source commits also change tests
Docs missing or thin: license, contributing, changelog

Most complex functions:

Security

Security posture is adequate: 7 known vulnerabilities in 3 dependencies. Weakest area: posture.

Area	Score
Secrets (gitleaks, tree + history)	100
Static analysis (Opengrep)	100
Vulnerable dependencies (OSV)	67
CI workflows (zizmor)	n/a
Posture (policy, updates, signing, lockfiles)	0
OpenSSF Scorecard	n/a

Known vulnerabilities: 7 in 3 packages (critical 0, high 3, medium 3, low 1)
Posture checks passed: lockfiles; missing: security policy, dependency updates, signed commits

Top findings

Severity	Finding	Location
high	`osv/GHSA-2v37-7h3g-55p8`: [email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-2v37-7h3g-55p8	pnpm-lock.yaml
high	`osv/GHSA-68fv-2mgg-jv7q`: [email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-68fv-2mgg-jv7q	pnpm-lock.yaml
high	`osv/GHSA-587h-7wmj-h5pm`: [email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-587h-7wmj-h5pm	pnpm-lock.yaml
medium	`osv/GHSA-698v-4r3x-3vcv`: [email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-698v-4r3x-3vcv	pnpm-lock.yaml
medium	`osv/GHSA-r825-w8mm-5pxw`: [email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-r825-w8mm-5pxw	pnpm-lock.yaml
medium	`osv/GHSA-rq7h-c2jc-7f22`: [email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-rq7h-c2jc-7f22	pnpm-lock.yaml
low	`opengrep/javascript.lang.security.audit.unsafe-formatstring`: Detected string concatenation with a non-literal variable in a util.format / console.log function. If an attacker injects a format specifier in the string, it will forge the log message. Try to use constant values for the format string. [confidence low]	src/core/kernel.js:15
low	`opengrep/javascript.lang.security.audit.unsafe-formatstring`: Detected string concatenation with a non-literal variable in a util.format / console.log function. If an attacker injects a format specifier in the string, it will forge the log message. Try to use constant values for the format string. [confidence low]	src/main.js:61
low	`opengrep/javascript.lang.security.audit.unsafe-formatstring`: Detected string concatenation with a non-literal variable in a util.format / console.log function. If an attacker injects a format specifier in the string, it will forge the log message. Try to use constant values for the format string. [confidence low]	src/main.js:93
low	`osv/GHSA-9jrq-w75r-8gcw`: [email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-9jrq-w75r-8gcw	pnpm-lock.yaml

Static signals only: the scorer never runs the project's code. Secret findings are pattern matches that were not verified, and secret values are never stored.

Repository profile

Source lines: 37,989; test lines: 0

Language	Lines
JavaScript	37,989