Leaderboard github.com
whyhowie/RokuPyRemote
A Python-based Roku remote controller on local network.
AI provenance
0%
possible
- Confidence
- 42%
- Coverage
- 100%
Estimated share of AI-generated code. Explicit attribution is a lower bound.
Code quality
51/100
weak
- Confidence
- 90%
- Coverage
- 100%
Complexity, duplication, lint density, tests, CI, docs and review process.
Security
64/100
weak
- Confidence
- 85%
- Coverage
- 100%
Secrets, static analysis, vulnerable dependencies, CI and supply-chain posture.
AI provenance
0% possible
Weak signals consistent with AI-assisted development.
How the score is built
- Explicitly attributed share0%
- Unattributed share in AI-pace bursts78%
- Estimated AI-generated share0%
- AI tool configuration files0
- Work sessions at AI pace1
- Releases at AI pacenot measured
- Coding-style index (1.0+ means possible)0.50
Lines added per month all AI-attributed share
- 2026-051,377 · 0% AI
Evidence by analyzer
Explicit AI attributionok
- attributed_commit_share
- 0.0%
- attributed_commits
- 0
- attributed_loc
- 0
- attributed_loc_share
- 0.0%
- commits
- 9
- effective_loc
- 1,377
- tools_detected
- 0
AI tool configurationok
- artifacts
- 0
- tools_configured
- 0
- workflow_agents
- 0
Commit velocityok1 item
- excluded_import_loc
- 0
- flagged_loc
- 1,073
- flagged_loc_share
- 77.9%
- flagged_units
- 1
- max_loc_per_hour
- 677.33
- measured_loc
- 1,377
- median_loc_per_hour
- 376.66
- pr_timed_units
- 0
- pre_ai_era_burst_loc
- 0
- pre_ai_era_bursts
- 0
- pre_ai_era_measured_loc
- 0
- work_units
- 2
Release velocityskipped
Coding styleok
- count:assistant_voice
- 0
- count:emoji_in_code
- 1
- count:narrated_steps
- 0
- count:placeholder
- 0
- files:assistant_voice
- 0
- files:emoji_in_code
- 1
- files:narrated_steps
- 0
- files:placeholder
- 0
- index
- 0.50
- lines_scanned
- 987
- per_kloc:assistant_voice
- 0
- per_kloc:emoji_in_code
- 1
- per_kloc:narrated_steps
- 0
- per_kloc:placeholder
- 0
Code quality
51 weak
Code quality is weak: test-to-source ratio 0.00, no CI test run detected; 0% of function code in complex or long functions; 2% duplicated lines. Weakest area: testing.
How the score is built
- Complexity100
- Duplication91
- Lint and smells22
- Tests and CI0
- Documentation65
- Type safety40
- Review processnot measured
Evidence by analyzer
Complexity (lizard)ok
- complex_functions
- 0
- function_nloc
- 652
- functions
- 82
- long_functions
- 0
- many_param_functions
- 1
- mean_ccn
- 1.91
- p90_ccn
- 3
- risky_nloc_share
- 0.0%
Duplication (jscpd)ok1 item
- compared_lines
- 770
- duplicated_lines
- 12
- duplicated_share
- 1.6%
- files
- 11
Lintok
- category:best-practice
- 3
- category:maintainability
- 1
- findings
- 4
- scanned_lines
- 987
- weighted_findings
- 6
Tests and CIok
- check:ci_present
- no
- check:ci_runs_lint
- no
- check:ci_runs_tests
- no
- check:has_tests
- no
- check:test_ratio
- no
- check:tests_cochange
- no
- ci_files
- 0
- cochange_commits
- 3
- cochange_share
- 0.0%
- source_lines
- 987
- test_lines
- 0
- test_ratio
- 0
Documentationok2 items
- README.md
README.md - LICENSE
LICENSE
- check:changelog
- no
- check:contributing
- no
- check:license
- yes
- check:readme
- yes
- readme_lines
- 44
Type safetyok
- check:low_escape_density
- yes
- check:strict_config
- no
- escapes
- 0
- escapes_per_kloc
- 0
Security
64 weak
Security posture is weak: 2 high-severity SAST findings. Weakest area: posture.
How the score is built
- Secrets100
- Static analysis (SAST)50
- Vulnerable dependenciesnot measured
- CI workflowsnot measured
- Security posture0
- OpenSSF Scorecardnot measured
Evidence by analyzer
OpenSSF Scorecardskipped
no published OpenSSF Scorecard result for this repo
Package registriesskipped
no registry dependencies declared
Secrets (gitleaks)ok
- secrets_current
- 0
- secrets_history
- 0
- secrets_low_confidence
- 0
- secrets_nonprod
- 0
Static analysis (opengrep)ok
- findings
- 4
- findings_high
- 2
- findings_low
- 0
- findings_medium
- 2
- parse_errors
- 0
- scanned_lines
- 987
- weighted_findings
- 2
Dependencies (osv-scanner)skipped
CI workflows (zizmor)skipped
Security postureok
- check:dependency_updates
- no
- check:lockfiles
- yes
- check:security_policy
- no
- check:signed_commits
- no
- signed_commit_share
- 0.0%
- unpinned_manifests
- 0
Release downloadsok1 item
- binary_assets
- 1
- signals
- 1
- suspicious
- 0
Findings
3 high5 medium
8 findings
| Severity | Rule | Location | Message | Tool |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| high | opengrep/python.lang.best-practice.arbitrary-sleep |
dev.py:49 | time.sleep() call; did you mean to leave this in? | Lint |
| high | opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.dangerous-subprocess-use-audit |
dev.py:30 | Detected subprocess function 'Popen' without a static string. If this data can be controlled by a malicious actor, it may be an instance of command injection. Audit the use of this call to ensure it is not controllable by an external... | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| high | opengrep/python.lang.security.use-defused-xml |
roku_remote/network.py:4 | The Python documentation recommends using `defusedxml` instead of `xml` because the native Python `xml` library is vulnerable to XML External Entity (XXE) attacks. These attacks can leak confidential data and "XML bombs" can cause... | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| medium | opengrep/python.lang.maintainability.is-function-without-parentheses |
dev.py:33 | Is "is_directory" a function or an attribute? If it is a function, you may have meant event.is_directory() because event.is_directory is always true. | Lint |
| medium | opengrep/python.lang.best-practice.unspecified-open-encoding |
roku_remote/config.py:23 | Missing 'encoding' parameter. 'open()' uses device locale encodings by default, corrupting files with special characters. Specify the encoding to ensure cross-platform support when opening files in text mode (e.g. encoding="utf-8"). | Lint |
| medium | opengrep/python.lang.best-practice.unspecified-open-encoding |
roku_remote/config.py:33 | Missing 'encoding' parameter. 'open()' uses device locale encodings by default, corrupting files with special characters. Specify the encoding to ensure cross-platform support when opening files in text mode (e.g. encoding="utf-8"). | Lint |
| medium | opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.dynamic-urllib-use-detected |
roku_remote/network.py:22 | Detected a dynamic value being used with urllib. urllib supports 'file://' schemes, so a dynamic value controlled by a malicious actor may allow them to read arbitrary files. Audit uses of urllib calls to ensure user data cannot control... | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| medium | opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.dynamic-urllib-use-detected |
roku_remote/network.py:45 | Detected a dynamic value being used with urllib. urllib supports 'file://' schemes, so a dynamic value controlled by a malicious actor may allow them to read arbitrary files. Audit uses of urllib calls to ensure user data cannot control... | Static analysis (opengrep) |
Tools and coverage
Every analyzer that ran on this commit. A failed or skipped tool is a coverage gap: its share of the score is left out and the coverage figure drops.
| Analyzer | Pillar | Status | Version | Findings | Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI tool configuration | AI provenance | ok | signatures-v1 | 0 | |
| Explicit AI attribution | AI provenance | ok | signatures-v1 | 0 | |
| Release velocity | AI provenance | skipped | — | 0 | |
| Coding style | AI provenance | ok | — | 0 | |
| Commit velocity | AI provenance | ok | prov-4 | 0 | |
| Complexity (lizard) | Code quality | ok | lizard 1.25.1 | 0 | |
| Documentation | Code quality | ok | — | 0 | |
| Duplication (jscpd) | Code quality | ok | repotrust-dup-w6 | 0 | |
| Lint | Code quality | ok | opengrep 1.33.1; rules f1d2b562b414 | 4 | |
| Tests and CI | Code quality | ok | — | 0 | |
| Type safety | Code quality | ok | — | 0 | |
| CI workflows (zizmor) | Security | skipped | — | 0 | |
| Dependencies (osv-scanner) | Security | skipped | — | 0 | |
| Release downloads | Security | ok | — | 0 | |
| Security posture | Security | ok | — | 0 | |
| Package registries | Security | skipped | — | 0 | no registry dependencies declared |
| Static analysis (opengrep) | Security | ok | opengrep 1.33.1; rules f1d2b562b414 | 4 | |
| OpenSSF Scorecard | Security | skipped | — | 0 | no published OpenSSF Scorecard result for this repo |
| Secrets (gitleaks) | Security | ok | gitleaks 8.30.1 | 0 |
Score history
Scores from different scoring versions aren't directly comparable.
| Scored | Commit | Scoring | AI provenance | Quality | Security |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-11-14 | 30aab7ed75d7 | prov-5+qual-2+sec-2 | 0% | 51 | 64 |
| 2026-11-14 | 30aab7ed75d7 | prov-4+qual-2+sec-2 | 0% | 51 | 64 |
Full text report
- Repository: https://github.com/whyhowie/RokuPyRemote
- Commit:
30aab7ed75d7b7a477bdff7abb7401992f155e74 - Generated: 2026-11-14T14:52:08+00:00
- Scorer 0.1.0, scoring prov-5+qual-2+sec-2, report schema v2
Scores
| Pillar | Score | Signal | Confidence | Coverage |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI provenance (estimated AI-generated share) | 0 | possible | 42% | 100% |
| Code quality | 51 | weak | 90% | 100% |
| Security | 64 | weak | 85% | 100% |
AI provenance
Weak signals consistent with AI-assisted development.
-
Explicitly attributed share (lower bound): 0.0%
-
Unattributed share in AI-consistent velocity bursts: 77.9%
-
Estimated AI-generated share: 0.0%
-
Stylometry index: 0.50 per 1,000 lines (narrated steps 0, placeholders 0, assistant phrasing 0, emoji 1). Reported as a signal, not scored.
| Month | Lines added | Attributed to AI |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-05 | 1,377 | 0% |
Evidence
- 1,073 lines of first-party code in ~1.6h (677 lines/hour, 2 commit session) (b6be0788305e)
AI provenance describes how code was produced; it is not a quality judgment. Unless attribution is explicit, these are signals consistent with AI generation, not proof. Squash/rebase workflows, imported code, and rewritten history reduce accuracy.
Code quality
Code quality is weak: test-to-source ratio 0.00, no CI test run detected; 0% of function code in complex or long functions; 2% duplicated lines. Weakest area: testing.
| Area | Score |
|---|---|
| Complexity (lizard) | 100 |
| Duplication | 91 |
| Code smells (Opengrep) | 22 |
| Tests and CI | 0 |
| Documentation | 65 |
| Type safety | 40 |
| Process (Scorecard review/maintenance) | n/a |
- Functions: 82; mean complexity 1.9, 90th percentile 3; 0 complex and 0 long functions
- Duplicated lines: 1.6% of 770 compared
- Tests: 0 test lines for 987 source lines (ratio 0.00); CI test commands: none detected; 0% of recent source commits also change tests
- Docs missing or thin: contributing, changelog
Security
Security posture is weak: 2 high-severity SAST findings. Weakest area: posture.
| Area | Score |
|---|---|
| Secrets (gitleaks, tree + history) | 100 |
| Static analysis (Opengrep) | 50 |
| Vulnerable dependencies (OSV) | n/a |
| CI workflows (zizmor) | n/a |
| Posture (policy, updates, signing, lockfiles) | 0 |
| OpenSSF Scorecard | n/a |
- Posture checks passed: lockfiles; missing: security policy, dependency updates, signed commits
Top findings
| Severity | Finding | Location |
|---|---|---|
| high | opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.dangerous-subprocess-use-audit: Detected subprocess function 'Popen' without a static string. If this data can be controlled by a malicious actor, it may be an instance of command injection. Audit the use of this call to ensure it is not controllable by an external resource. You may consider using 'shlex.escape()'. [confidence low] |
dev.py:30 |
| high | opengrep/python.lang.security.use-defused-xml: The Python documentation recommends using defusedxml instead of xml because the native Python xml library is vulnerable to XML External Entity (XXE) attacks. These attacks can leak confidential data and "XML bombs" can cause denial of service. [confidence low] |
roku_remote/network.py:4 |
| medium | opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.dynamic-urllib-use-detected: Detected a dynamic value being used with urllib. urllib supports 'file://' schemes, so a dynamic value controlled by a malicious actor may allow them to read arbitrary files. Audit uses of urllib calls to ensure user data cannot control the URLs, or consider using the 'requests' library instead. [confidence low] |
roku_remote/network.py:22 |
| medium | opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.dynamic-urllib-use-detected: Detected a dynamic value being used with urllib. urllib supports 'file://' schemes, so a dynamic value controlled by a malicious actor may allow them to read arbitrary files. Audit uses of urllib calls to ensure user data cannot control the URLs, or consider using the 'requests' library instead. [confidence low] |
roku_remote/network.py:45 |
Static signals only: the scorer never runs the project's code. Secret findings are pattern matches that were not verified, and secret values are never stored.
Distribution signals
- binary-release-asset: release v0.1.0 ships roku_remote.exe (6 downloads)
Signals consistent with a repository that exists to distribute a download. They are heuristics, not a verdict; release files were not downloaded or inspected.
Repository profile
- Source lines: 987; test lines: 0
| Language | Lines |
|---|---|
| Python | 987 |