Leaderboard github.com

vitallium/markdownlint-lsp

View repository ↗
JavaScript
★ 3
commit e1c9053a39d3
scored 2026-11-14
scoring prov-5+qual-2+sec-2

AI provenance

explicit

Confidence: 95%
Coverage: 100%

Estimated share of AI-generated code. Explicit attribution is a lower bound.

Code quality

82/100

strong

Confidence: 90%
Coverage: 100%

Complexity, duplication, lint density, tests, CI, docs and review process.

Security

81/100

adequate

Confidence: 85%
Coverage: 100%

Secrets, static analysis, vulnerable dependencies, CI and supply-chain posture.

Dispute or request a re-score Full report JSON

AI provenance

6% explicit

Explicit AI attribution on 6% of first-party code added; an estimated 6% including velocity signals.

How the score is built

Explicitly attributed share6%
Unattributed share in AI-pace bursts0%
Estimated AI-generated share6%
AI tool configuration files1
Work sessions at AI pace0
Releases at AI pace0
Coding-style index (1.0+ means possible)0.00

Attributed AI tools

Tool	Commits	Lines added	First seen	Last seen
Claude Code	18	315	2025-07-11	2026-07-16
Cursor agent	1	250	2026-07-09	2026-07-09

Lines added per month all AI-attributed share

2025-071,231 · 6% AI
2025-094 · 0% AI
2025-102,204 · 0% AI
2025-1167 · 0% AI
2025-121 · 0% AI
2026-01195 · 86% AI
2026-02773 · 0% AI
2026-03194 · 11% AI
2026-040 · 0% AI
2026-051,317 · 0% AI
2026-07313 · 99% AI
2026-08339 · 0% AI
2026-09600 · 0% AI
2026-103,008 · 0% AI

Findings in AI-attributed lines vs the rest

From git blame: 98 lines trace to AI-attributed commits, 2,218 to others. Too few lines in one group for a fair comparison. Reported, not scored.

Findings per 1,000 lines	AI-attributed	Other	Ratio
Code quality	0.00	0.45	—
Security	0.00	0.90	—

Evidence by analyzer

Explicit AI attributionok21 items

attributed_commit_share: 10.0%
attributed_commits: 19
attributed_loc: 565
attributed_loc_share: 5.5%
commits: 190
effective_loc: 10,246
tools_detected: 2

AI tool configurationok1 item

AGENTS.md (generic-agent configuration)

artifacts: 1
earliest_adoption: 2025-10-26
tools_configured: 1
workflow_agents: 0

Commit velocityok

excluded_import_loc: 0
flagged_loc: 0
flagged_loc_share: 0.0%
flagged_units: 0
max_loc_per_hour: 686.27
measured_loc: 10,246
median_loc_per_hour: 178.11
pr_timed_units: 18
pre_ai_era_burst_loc: 0
pre_ai_era_bursts: 0
pre_ai_era_measured_loc: 0
work_units: 58

Release velocityok

flagged_releases: 0
max_loc_per_day: 252.70
releases: 13

Coding styleok

count:assistant_voice: 0
count:emoji_in_code: 0
count:narrated_steps: 0
count:placeholder: 0
files:assistant_voice: 0
files:emoji_in_code: 0
files:narrated_steps: 0
files:placeholder: 0
index: 0
lines_scanned: 2,316
per_kloc:assistant_voice: 0
per_kloc:emoji_in_code: 0
per_kloc:narrated_steps: 0
per_kloc:placeholder: 0

Findings in AI-written linesok

ai_lines: 98
blame_failures: 0
files_blamed: 13
other_lines: 2,218
quality:ai_findings: 0
quality:ai_per_kloc: 0
quality:other_findings: 1
quality:other_per_kloc: 0.45
security:ai_findings: 0
security:ai_per_kloc: 0
security:other_findings: 2
security:other_per_kloc: 0.90

Code quality

82 strong

Code quality is strong: test-to-source ratio 2.32, CI runs tests; 19% of function code in complex or long functions; 2% duplicated lines. Weakest area: complexity.

How the score is built

Complexity57
Duplication91
Lint and smells90
Tests and CI90
Documentation85
Type safetynot measured
Review processnot measured

Evidence by analyzer

Complexity (lizard)ok5 items

complex_functions: 5
function_nloc: 1,830
functions: 153
long_functions: 1
many_param_functions: 0
mean_ccn: 3.09
p90_ccn: 6
risky_nloc_share: 18.7%

Duplication (jscpd)ok2 items

compared_lines: 1,548
duplicated_lines: 24
duplicated_share: 1.6%
files: 13

Lintok

category:best-practice: 1
findings: 1
scanned_lines: 2,316
weighted_findings: 1

Tests and CIok2 items

CI config: .github/workflows/ci.yml .github/workflows/ci.yml
CI runs tests (npm test, pnpm test)

check:ci_present: yes
check:ci_runs_lint: no
check:ci_runs_tests: yes
check:has_tests: yes
check:test_ratio: yes
check:tests_cochange: yes
ci_files: 1
cochange_commits: 110
cochange_share: 38.2%
source_lines: 2,316
test_lines: 5,381
test_ratio: 2.32

Documentationok3 items

README.md README.md
LICENSE LICENSE
CHANGELOG.md CHANGELOG.md

check:changelog: yes
check:contributing: no
check:license: yes
check:readme: yes
readme_lines: 70

Type safetyskipped

Security

81 adequate

Security posture is adequate: 4 known vulnerabilities in 4 dependencies. Weakest area: posture.

How the score is built

Secrets97
Static analysis (SAST)93
Vulnerable dependencies78
CI workflows85
Security posture20
OpenSSF Scorecardnot measured

Evidence by analyzer

OpenSSF Scorecardskipped

no published OpenSSF Scorecard result for this repo

Package registriesok

checked: 13
declared: 13
lookup_errors: 0
missing: 0
recent: 0

Secrets (gitleaks)ok

secrets_current: 0
secrets_history: 0
secrets_low_confidence: 0
secrets_nonprod: 1

Static analysis (opengrep)ok

findings: 2
findings_high: 0
findings_low: 0
findings_medium: 2
parse_errors: 0
scanned_lines: 2,316
weighted_findings: 0.50

Dependencies (osv-scanner)ok

penalty: 15
vulnerabilities: 4
vulnerable_packages: 4
vulns_critical: 0
vulns_high: 1
vulns_low: 1
vulns_medium: 2
vulns_unknown: 0

CI workflows (zizmor)ok

findings: 5
findings_high: 0
findings_low: 0
findings_medium: 5
penalty: 9.60
workflows: 1

Security postureok

check:dependency_updates: no
check:lockfiles: yes
check:security_policy: no
check:signed_commits: yes
signed_commit_share: 95.3%
unpinned_manifests: 0

Release downloadsok

binary_assets: 0
signals: 0
suspicious: 0

Findings

1 high10 medium2 low

Severity	Rule	Location	Message	Tool
high	`osv/GHSA-gg6h-894w-4m9c`	pnpm-lock.yaml	[email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-gg6h-894w-4m9c	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
medium	`opengrep/javascript.lang.best-practice.lazy-load-module`	lib/config.mjs:119	Lazy loading can complicate code bundling if care is not taken, also `require`s are run synchronously by Node.js. If they are called from within a function, it may block other requests from being handled at a more critical time. The...	Lint
medium	`zizmor/excessive-permissions`	.github/workflows/ci.yml:1	overly broad permissions [confidence medium]	CI workflows (zizmor)
medium	`zizmor/excessive-permissions`	.github/workflows/ci.yml:10	overly broad permissions [confidence medium]	CI workflows (zizmor)
medium	`zizmor/artipacked`	.github/workflows/ci.yml:13	credential persistence through GitHub Actions artifacts [confidence low]	CI workflows (zizmor)
medium	`zizmor/excessive-permissions`	.github/workflows/ci.yml:24	overly broad permissions [confidence medium]	CI workflows (zizmor)
medium	`zizmor/artipacked`	.github/workflows/ci.yml:33	credential persistence through GitHub Actions artifacts [confidence low]	CI workflows (zizmor)
medium	`opengrep/javascript.lang.security.html-in-template-string`	lib/config.mjs:109	This template literal looks like HTML and has interpolated variables. These variables are not HTML-encoded by default. If the variables contain HTML tags, these may be interpreted by the browser, resulting in cross-site scripting (XSS)....	Static analysis (opengrep)
medium	`opengrep/javascript.lang.security.audit.detect-non-literal-require`	lib/config.mjs:119	Detected the use of require(variable). Calling require with a non-literal argument might allow an attacker to load and run arbitrary code, or access arbitrary files. [confidence low]	Static analysis (opengrep)
medium	`osv/GHSA-3g3m-2fjr-6pw4`	pnpm-lock.yaml	[email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-3g3m-2fjr-6pw4	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
medium	`osv/GHSA-g3hv-75wg-m249`	pnpm-lock.yaml	[email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-g3hv-75wg-m249	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
low	`osv/GHSA-238p-pmpm-9mq7`	pnpm-lock.yaml	[email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-238p-pmpm-9mq7	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
low	`gitleaks/generic-api-key`	test/config-log-redaction.test.mjs:62	Possible generic-api-key secret in the current tree (test/docs/example file)	Secrets (gitleaks)

Tools and coverage

Every analyzer that ran on this commit. A failed or skipped tool is a coverage gap: its share of the score is left out and the coverage figure drops.

Analyzer	Pillar	Status	Version	Findings	Note
AI tool configuration	AI provenance	ok	`signatures-v1`	0
Explicit AI attribution	AI provenance	ok	`signatures-v1`	0
Release velocity	AI provenance	ok	`prov-4`	0
Coding style	AI provenance	ok	`—`	0
Commit velocity	AI provenance	ok	`prov-4`	0
Findings in AI-written lines	AI provenance	ok	`git-blame`	0
Complexity (lizard)	Code quality	ok	`lizard 1.25.1`	0
Documentation	Code quality	ok	`—`	0
Duplication (jscpd)	Code quality	ok	`repotrust-dup-w6`	0
Lint	Code quality	ok	`opengrep 1.33.1; rules f1d2b562b414`	1
Tests and CI	Code quality	ok	`—`	0
Type safety	Code quality	skipped	`—`	0
CI workflows (zizmor)	Security	ok	`zizmor 1.32.0`	5
Dependencies (osv-scanner)	Security	ok	`osv-scanner version: 2.7.1`	4
Release downloads	Security	ok	`—`	0
Security posture	Security	ok	`—`	0
Package registries	Security	ok	`—`	0
Static analysis (opengrep)	Security	ok	`opengrep 1.33.1; rules f1d2b562b414`	2
OpenSSF Scorecard	Security	skipped	`—`	0	no published OpenSSF Scorecard result for this repo
Secrets (gitleaks)	Security	ok	`gitleaks 8.30.1`	1

Score history

Scores from different scoring versions aren't directly comparable.

Scored	Commit	Scoring	AI provenance	Quality	Security
2026-11-14	`e1c9053a39d3`	`prov-5+qual-2+sec-2`	6%	82	81
2026-11-14	`e1c9053a39d3`	`prov-4+qual-2+sec-2`	6%	82	81

Embed a badge

Maintainers can show these in a README. Badges update when the repository is re-scored.

[![RepoTrust ai](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/badge/github.com/vitallium/markdownlint-lsp/ai.svg)](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/r/github.com/vitallium/markdownlint-lsp/)

[![RepoTrust quality](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/badge/github.com/vitallium/markdownlint-lsp/quality.svg)](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/r/github.com/vitallium/markdownlint-lsp/)

[![RepoTrust security](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/badge/github.com/vitallium/markdownlint-lsp/security.svg)](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/r/github.com/vitallium/markdownlint-lsp/)

Full text report

Repository: https://github.com/vitallium/markdownlint-lsp
Commit: e1c9053a39d3044ffb0dfc4658a39f9860c0980e
Generated: 2026-11-14T14:52:08+00:00
Scorer 0.1.0, scoring prov-5+qual-2+sec-2, report schema v2

Scores

Pillar	Score	Signal	Confidence	Coverage
AI provenance (estimated AI-generated share)	6	explicit	95%	100%
Code quality	82	strong	90%	100%
Security	81	adequate	85%	100%

AI provenance

Explicit AI attribution on 6% of first-party code added; an estimated 6% including velocity signals.

Explicitly attributed share (lower bound): 5.5%
Unattributed share in AI-consistent velocity bursts: 0.0%
Estimated AI-generated share: 5.5%

AI tool	Attributed commits	Lines added
Claude Code	18	315
Cursor agent	1	250

AI tooling configured in repo: generic-agent

Current source lines last changed by AI-attributed commits: 98 of 2,316.

Too few lines in one group to compare finding densities.

Month	Lines added	Attributed to AI
2025-09	4	0%
2025-10	2,204	0%
2025-11	67	0%
2025-12	1	0%
2026-01	195	86%
2026-02	773	0%
2026-03	194	11%
2026-05	1,317	0%
2026-07	313	99%
2026-08	339	0%
2026-09	600	0%
2026-10	3,008	0%

Evidence

Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (db6eabd9c24c)
Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (ca352429a037)
Cursor agent: trailer 'Co-authored-by: Cursor' (d9e4f6b31096)
Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (0feb9509deab)
Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (a7b2d43a847c)
Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (13858507cf8c)
Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (f6e5674ebce2)
Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (165fcac99f1d)
Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (c4baee511c23)
Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (dcf9dca418d8)
Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (3c6c296901d1)
Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (d9fc17c24ee5)
Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (e5a0dddac459)
Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (97bd4397eed1)
Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (8ac6e14fa170)

AI provenance describes how code was produced; it is not a quality judgment. Unless attribution is explicit, these are signals consistent with AI generation, not proof. Squash/rebase workflows, imported code, and rewritten history reduce accuracy.

Code quality

Code quality is strong: test-to-source ratio 2.32, CI runs tests; 19% of function code in complex or long functions; 2% duplicated lines. Weakest area: complexity.

Area	Score
Complexity (lizard)	57
Duplication	91
Code smells (Opengrep)	90
Tests and CI	90
Documentation	85
Type safety	n/a
Process (Scorecard review/maintenance)	n/a

Functions: 153; mean complexity 3.1, 90th percentile 6; 5 complex and 1 long functions
Duplicated lines: 1.6% of 1,548 compared
Tests: 5,381 test lines for 2,316 source lines (ratio 2.32); CI test commands: npm test, pnpm test; 38% of recent source commits also change tests
Docs missing or thin: contributing

Most complex functions:

Security

Security posture is adequate: 4 known vulnerabilities in 4 dependencies. Weakest area: posture.

Area	Score
Secrets (gitleaks, tree + history)	97
Static analysis (Opengrep)	93
Vulnerable dependencies (OSV)	78
CI workflows (zizmor)	85
Posture (policy, updates, signing, lockfiles)	20
OpenSSF Scorecard	n/a

Known vulnerabilities: 4 in 4 packages (critical 0, high 1, medium 2, low 1)
Posture checks passed: signed commits, lockfiles; missing: security policy, dependency updates

Top findings

Severity	Finding	Location
high	`osv/GHSA-gg6h-894w-4m9c`: [email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-gg6h-894w-4m9c	pnpm-lock.yaml
medium	`opengrep/javascript.lang.security.html-in-template-string`: This template literal looks like HTML and has interpolated variables. These variables are not HTML-encoded by default. If the variables contain HTML tags, these may be interpreted by the browser, resulting in cross-site scripting (XSS). [confidence low]	lib/config.mjs:109
medium	`opengrep/javascript.lang.security.audit.detect-non-literal-require`: Detected the use of require(variable). Calling require with a non-literal argument might allow an attacker to load and run arbitrary code, or access arbitrary files. [confidence low]	lib/config.mjs:119
medium	`osv/GHSA-3g3m-2fjr-6pw4`: [email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-3g3m-2fjr-6pw4	pnpm-lock.yaml
medium	`osv/GHSA-g3hv-75wg-m249`: [email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-g3hv-75wg-m249	pnpm-lock.yaml
medium	`zizmor/artipacked`: credential persistence through GitHub Actions artifacts [confidence low]	.github/workflows/ci.yml:13
medium	`zizmor/artipacked`: credential persistence through GitHub Actions artifacts [confidence low]	.github/workflows/ci.yml:33
medium	`zizmor/excessive-permissions`: overly broad permissions [confidence medium]	.github/workflows/ci.yml:1
medium	`zizmor/excessive-permissions`: overly broad permissions [confidence medium]	.github/workflows/ci.yml:10
medium	`zizmor/excessive-permissions`: overly broad permissions [confidence medium]	.github/workflows/ci.yml:24
low	`gitleaks/generic-api-key`: Possible generic-api-key secret in the current tree (test/docs/example file)	test/config-log-redaction.test.mjs:62
low	`osv/GHSA-238p-pmpm-9mq7`: [email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-238p-pmpm-9mq7	pnpm-lock.yaml

Static signals only: the scorer never runs the project's code. Secret findings are pattern matches that were not verified, and secret values are never stored.

Repository profile

Source lines: 2,316; test lines: 5,381

Language	Lines
JavaScript	7,697