RepoTrust

Leaderboard github.com

vale981/prodrafts_render

  • View repository ↗
  • Python
  • ★ 1
  • commit a5907c1b3be6
  • scored 2026-11-14
  • scoring prov-5+qual-2+sec-2

AI provenance

0%

none-detected

Confidence
41%
Coverage
100%

Estimated share of AI-generated code. Explicit attribution is a lower bound.

Code quality

29/100

poor

Confidence
90%
Coverage
100%

Complexity, duplication, lint density, tests, CI, docs and review process.

Security

72/100

adequate

Confidence
85%
Coverage
100%

Secrets, static analysis, vulnerable dependencies, CI and supply-chain posture.

Dispute or request a re-score Full report JSON RepoTrust ai badgeRepoTrust quality badgeRepoTrust security badge

AI provenance

0% none-detected

No AI attribution or AI-consistent velocity signals detected.

How the score is built

  • Explicitly attributed share0%
  • Unattributed share in AI-pace bursts0%
  • Estimated AI-generated share0%
  • AI tool configuration files0
  • Work sessions at AI pace0
  • Releases at AI pacenot measured
  • Coding-style index (1.0+ means possible)0.00

Lines added per month all AI-attributed share

  1. 2026-051,431 · 0% AI

Evidence by analyzer

Explicit AI attributionok
attributed_commit_share
0.0%
attributed_commits
0
attributed_loc
0
attributed_loc_share
0.0%
commits
2
effective_loc
1,431
tools_detected
0
AI tool configurationok
artifacts
0
tools_configured
0
workflow_agents
0
Commit velocityok
excluded_import_loc
0
flagged_loc
0
flagged_loc_share
0.0%
flagged_units
0
max_loc_per_hour
304
measured_loc
1,431
median_loc_per_hour
178.88
pr_timed_units
0
pre_ai_era_burst_loc
0
pre_ai_era_bursts
0
pre_ai_era_measured_loc
0
work_units
2
Release velocityskipped
Coding styleok
count:assistant_voice
0
count:emoji_in_code
0
count:narrated_steps
0
count:placeholder
0
files:assistant_voice
0
files:emoji_in_code
0
files:narrated_steps
0
files:placeholder
0
index
0
lines_scanned
550
per_kloc:assistant_voice
0
per_kloc:emoji_in_code
0
per_kloc:narrated_steps
0
per_kloc:placeholder
0

Code quality

29 poor

Code quality is poor: test-to-source ratio 0.00, no CI test run detected; 68% of function code in complex or long functions; 0% duplicated lines. Weakest area: testing.

How the score is built

  • Complexity13
  • Duplication100
  • Lint and smells17
  • Tests and CI0
  • Documentation40
  • Type safety40
  • Review processnot measured

Evidence by analyzer

Complexity (lizard)ok4 items
complex_functions
4
function_nloc
370
functions
13
long_functions
1
many_param_functions
0
mean_ccn
11.23
p90_ccn
31
risky_nloc_share
67.6%
Duplication (jscpd)ok
compared_lines
457
duplicated_lines
0
duplicated_share
0.0%
files
2
Lintok
category:best-practice
6
category:maintainability
1
findings
7
scanned_lines
550
weighted_findings
7
Tests and CIok
check:ci_present
no
check:ci_runs_lint
no
check:ci_runs_tests
no
check:has_tests
no
check:test_ratio
no
check:tests_cochange
no
ci_files
0
cochange_commits
2
cochange_share
0.0%
source_lines
550
test_lines
0
test_ratio
0
Documentationok1 item
  • README.md README.md
check:changelog
no
check:contributing
no
check:license
no
check:readme
yes
readme_lines
62
Type safetyok
check:low_escape_density
yes
check:strict_config
no
escapes
0
escapes_per_kloc
0

Security

72 adequate

Security posture is adequate: 1 high-severity SAST findings. Weakest area: posture.

How the score is built

  • Secrets97
  • Static analysis (SAST)77
  • Vulnerable dependenciesnot measured
  • CI workflowsnot measured
  • Security posture0
  • OpenSSF Scorecardnot measured

Evidence by analyzer

OpenSSF Scorecardskipped

no published OpenSSF Scorecard result for this repo

Package registriesskipped

no registry dependencies declared

Secrets (gitleaks)ok
secrets_current
0
secrets_history
0
secrets_low_confidence
1
secrets_nonprod
0
Static analysis (opengrep)ok
findings
1
findings_high
1
findings_low
0
findings_medium
0
parse_errors
0
scanned_lines
550
weighted_findings
0.75
Dependencies (osv-scanner)skipped
CI workflows (zizmor)skipped
Security postureok
check:dependency_updates
no
check:lockfiles
yes
check:security_policy
no
check:signed_commits
no
signed_commit_share
0.0%
unpinned_manifests
0
Release downloadsok
binary_assets
0
signals
0
suspicious
0

Findings

1 high7 medium1 low

SeverityRuleLocationMessageTool
high opengrep/python.lang.security.use-defused-xml render_pencilkit.py:11 The Python documentation recommends using `defusedxml` instead of `xml` because the native Python `xml` library is vulnerable to XML External Entity (XXE) attacks. These attacks can leak confidential data and "XML bombs" can cause... Static analysis (opengrep)
medium opengrep/python.lang.best-practice.unspecified-open-encoding bulk_convert.py:123 Missing 'encoding' parameter. 'open()' uses device locale encodings by default, corrupting files with special characters. Specify the encoding to ensure cross-platform support when opening files in text mode (e.g. encoding="utf-8"). Lint
medium opengrep/python.lang.best-practice.unspecified-open-encoding bulk_convert.py:219 Missing 'encoding' parameter. 'open()' uses device locale encodings by default, corrupting files with special characters. Specify the encoding to ensure cross-platform support when opening files in text mode (e.g. encoding="utf-8"). Lint
medium opengrep/python.lang.best-practice.unspecified-open-encoding bulk_convert.py:224 Missing 'encoding' parameter. 'open()' uses device locale encodings by default, corrupting files with special characters. Specify the encoding to ensure cross-platform support when opening files in text mode (e.g. encoding="utf-8"). Lint
medium opengrep/python.lang.best-practice.unspecified-open-encoding bulk_convert.py:235 Missing 'encoding' parameter. 'open()' uses device locale encodings by default, corrupting files with special characters. Specify the encoding to ensure cross-platform support when opening files in text mode (e.g. encoding="utf-8"). Lint
medium opengrep/python.lang.maintainability.is-function-without-parentheses bulk_convert.py:35 Is "is_trusted_session" a function or an attribute? If it is a function, you may have meant api.is_trusted_session() because api.is_trusted_session is always true. Lint
medium opengrep/python.lang.best-practice.unspecified-open-encoding bulk_convert.py:63 Missing 'encoding' parameter. 'open()' uses device locale encodings by default, corrupting files with special characters. Specify the encoding to ensure cross-platform support when opening files in text mode (e.g. encoding="utf-8"). Lint
medium opengrep/python.lang.best-practice.unspecified-open-encoding render_pencilkit.py:304 Missing 'encoding' parameter. 'open()' uses device locale encodings by default, corrupting files with special characters. Specify the encoding to ensure cross-platform support when opening files in text mode (e.g. encoding="utf-8"). Lint
low gitleaks/generic-api-key .cookies/applprotagonspace.session:1 Possible generic-api-key secret in history (commit d828ca3e54); removed from the current tree but still retrievable Secrets (gitleaks)

Tools and coverage

Every analyzer that ran on this commit. A failed or skipped tool is a coverage gap: its share of the score is left out and the coverage figure drops.

AnalyzerPillarStatusVersionFindingsNote
AI tool configurationAI provenanceoksignatures-v10
Explicit AI attributionAI provenanceoksignatures-v10
Release velocityAI provenanceskipped—0
Coding styleAI provenanceok—0
Commit velocityAI provenanceokprov-40
Complexity (lizard)Code qualityoklizard 1.25.10
DocumentationCode qualityok—0
Duplication (jscpd)Code qualityokrepotrust-dup-w60
LintCode qualityokopengrep 1.33.1; rules f1d2b562b4147
Tests and CICode qualityok—0
Type safetyCode qualityok—0
CI workflows (zizmor)Securityskipped—0
Dependencies (osv-scanner)Securityskipped—0
Release downloadsSecurityok—0
Security postureSecurityok—0
Package registriesSecurityskipped—0no registry dependencies declared
Static analysis (opengrep)Securityokopengrep 1.33.1; rules f1d2b562b4141
OpenSSF ScorecardSecurityskipped—0no published OpenSSF Scorecard result for this repo
Secrets (gitleaks)Securityokgitleaks 8.30.11

Score history

Scores from different scoring versions aren't directly comparable.

ScoredCommitScoringAI provenanceQualitySecurity
2026-11-14a5907c1b3be6prov-5+qual-2+sec-20%2972
2026-11-14a5907c1b3be6prov-4+qual-2+sec-20%2972

Embed a badge

Maintainers can show these in a README. Badges update when the repository is re-scored.

[![RepoTrust ai](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/badge/github.com/vale981/prodrafts_render/ai.svg)](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/r/github.com/vale981/prodrafts_render/)
[![RepoTrust quality](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/badge/github.com/vale981/prodrafts_render/quality.svg)](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/r/github.com/vale981/prodrafts_render/)
[![RepoTrust security](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/badge/github.com/vale981/prodrafts_render/security.svg)](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/r/github.com/vale981/prodrafts_render/)
Full text report

Scores

Pillar Score Signal Confidence Coverage
AI provenance (estimated AI-generated share) 0 none-detected 41% 100%
Code quality 29 poor 90% 100%
Security 72 adequate 85% 100%

AI provenance

No AI attribution or AI-consistent velocity signals detected.

  • Explicitly attributed share (lower bound): 0.0%
  • Unattributed share in AI-consistent velocity bursts: 0.0%
  • Estimated AI-generated share: 0.0%
Month Lines added Attributed to AI
2026-05 1,431 0%

AI provenance describes how code was produced; it is not a quality judgment. Unless attribution is explicit, these are signals consistent with AI generation, not proof. Squash/rebase workflows, imported code, and rewritten history reduce accuracy.

Code quality

Code quality is poor: test-to-source ratio 0.00, no CI test run detected; 68% of function code in complex or long functions; 0% duplicated lines. Weakest area: testing.

Area Score
Complexity (lizard) 13
Duplication 100
Code smells (Opengrep) 17
Tests and CI 0
Documentation 40
Type safety 40
Process (Scorecard review/maintenance) n/a
  • Functions: 13; mean complexity 11.2, 90th percentile 31; 4 complex and 1 long functions
  • Duplicated lines: 0.0% of 457 compared
  • Tests: 0 test lines for 550 source lines (ratio 0.00); CI test commands: none detected; 0% of recent source commits also change tests
  • Docs missing or thin: license, contributing, changelog

Most complex functions:

Security

Security posture is adequate: 1 high-severity SAST findings. Weakest area: posture.

Area Score
Secrets (gitleaks, tree + history) 97
Static analysis (Opengrep) 77
Vulnerable dependencies (OSV) n/a
CI workflows (zizmor) n/a
Posture (policy, updates, signing, lockfiles) 0
OpenSSF Scorecard n/a
  • Posture checks passed: lockfiles; missing: security policy, dependency updates, signed commits

Top findings

Severity Finding Location
high opengrep/python.lang.security.use-defused-xml: The Python documentation recommends using defusedxml instead of xml because the native Python xml library is vulnerable to XML External Entity (XXE) attacks. These attacks can leak confidential data and "XML bombs" can cause denial of service. [confidence low] render_pencilkit.py:11
low gitleaks/generic-api-key: Possible generic-api-key secret in history (commit d828ca3e54); removed from the current tree but still retrievable .cookies/applprotagonspace.session:1

Static signals only: the scorer never runs the project's code. Secret findings are pattern matches that were not verified, and secret values are never stored.

Repository profile

  • Source lines: 550; test lines: 0
Language Lines
Python 550