Leaderboard github.com

tuffzinc/epstienclickersourceleak

View repository ↗
JavaScript
★ 0
commit 519ba957e567
scored 2026-11-14
scoring prov-5+qual-2+sec-2

AI provenance

none-detected

Confidence: 41%
Coverage: 100%

Estimated share of AI-generated code. Explicit attribution is a lower bound.

Code quality

50/100

poor

Confidence: 90%
Coverage: 100%

Complexity, duplication, lint density, tests, CI, docs and review process.

Security

34/100

poor

Confidence: 85%
Coverage: 100%

Secrets, static analysis, vulnerable dependencies, CI and supply-chain posture.

Dispute or request a re-score Full report JSON

AI provenance

0% none-detected

No AI attribution or AI-consistent velocity signals detected.

How the score is built

Explicitly attributed share0%
Unattributed share in AI-pace bursts0%
Estimated AI-generated share0%
AI tool configuration files0
Work sessions at AI pace0
Releases at AI pacenot measured
Coding-style index (1.0+ means possible)0.00

Lines added per month all AI-attributed share

2026-051,840 · 0% AI

Evidence by analyzer

Explicit AI attributionok

attributed_commit_share: 0.0%
attributed_commits: 0
attributed_loc: 0
attributed_loc_share: 0.0%
commits: 2
effective_loc: 1,840
tools_detected: 0

AI tool configurationok

artifacts: 0
tools_configured: 0
workflow_agents: 0

Commit velocityok

excluded_import_loc: 0
flagged_loc: 0
flagged_loc_share: 0.0%
flagged_units: 0
max_loc_per_hour: 460
measured_loc: 1,840
median_loc_per_hour: 460
pr_timed_units: 0
pre_ai_era_burst_loc: 0
pre_ai_era_bursts: 0
pre_ai_era_measured_loc: 0
work_units: 1

Release velocityskipped

Coding styleok

count:assistant_voice: 0
count:emoji_in_code: 0
count:narrated_steps: 0
count:placeholder: 0
files:assistant_voice: 0
files:emoji_in_code: 0
files:narrated_steps: 0
files:placeholder: 0
index: 0
lines_scanned: 1,840
per_kloc:assistant_voice: 0
per_kloc:emoji_in_code: 0
per_kloc:narrated_steps: 0
per_kloc:placeholder: 0

Code quality

50 poor

Code quality is poor: test-to-source ratio 0.00, no CI test run detected; 22% of function code in complex or long functions; 0% duplicated lines. Weakest area: testing.

How the score is built

Complexity52
Duplication100
Lint and smells100
Tests and CI0
Documentation20
Type safetynot measured
Review processnot measured

Evidence by analyzer

Complexity (lizard)ok6 items

complex_functions: 6
function_nloc: 1,496
functions: 143
long_functions: 0
many_param_functions: 0
mean_ccn: 3.74
p90_ccn: 7
risky_nloc_share: 21.6%

Duplication (jscpd)ok

compared_lines: 1,399
duplicated_lines: 0
duplicated_share: 0.0%
files: 7

Lintok

findings: 0
scanned_lines: 1,840
weighted_findings: 0

Tests and CIok

check:ci_present: no
check:ci_runs_lint: no
check:ci_runs_tests: no
check:has_tests: no
check:test_ratio: no
check:tests_cochange: no
ci_files: 0
cochange_commits: 1
cochange_share: 0.0%
source_lines: 1,840
test_lines: 0
test_ratio: 0

Documentationok1 item

README.md README.md

check:changelog: no
check:contributing: no
check:license: no
check:readme: no
readme_lines: 1

Type safetyskipped

Security

34 poor

Security posture is poor: 1 possible secret(s) in the tree, 0 only in history; 10 high-severity SAST findings. Weakest area: sast.

How the score is built

Secrets50
Static analysis (SAST)19
Vulnerable dependenciesnot measured
CI workflowsnot measured
Security posture20
OpenSSF Scorecardnot measured

Evidence by analyzer

OpenSSF Scorecardskipped

no published OpenSSF Scorecard result for this repo

Package registriesskipped

no registry dependencies declared

Secrets (gitleaks)ok

secrets_current: 1
secrets_history: 0
secrets_low_confidence: 8
secrets_nonprod: 0

Static analysis (opengrep)ok

findings: 15
findings_high: 10
findings_low: 0
findings_medium: 5
parse_errors: 0
scanned_lines: 1,840
weighted_findings: 8.75

Dependencies (osv-scanner)skipped

CI workflows (zizmor)skipped

Security postureok

check:dependency_updates: no
check:lockfiles: yes
check:security_policy: no
check:signed_commits: yes
signed_commit_share: 100.0%
unpinned_manifests: 0

Release downloadsok

binary_assets: 0
signals: 0
suspicious: 0

Findings

11 high5 medium8 low

Severity	Rule	Location	Message	Tool
high	`opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-document-method`	game.js:291	User controlled data in methods like `innerHTML`, `outerHTML` or `document.write` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low]	Static analysis (opengrep)
high	`opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-innerhtml`	game.js:291	User controlled data in a `left.innerHTML` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low]	Static analysis (opengrep)
high	`opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-document-method`	game.js:399	User controlled data in methods like `innerHTML`, `outerHTML` or `document.write` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low]	Static analysis (opengrep)
high	`opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-innerhtml`	game.js:399	User controlled data in a `breakdownEl.innerHTML` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low]	Static analysis (opengrep)
high	`opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-document-method`	leaderboard.js:28	User controlled data in methods like `innerHTML`, `outerHTML` or `document.write` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low]	Static analysis (opengrep)
high	`opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-innerhtml`	leaderboard.js:28	User controlled data in a `el.innerHTML` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low]	Static analysis (opengrep)
high	`opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-document-method`	leaderboard.js:429	User controlled data in methods like `innerHTML`, `outerHTML` or `document.write` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low]	Static analysis (opengrep)
high	`opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-innerhtml`	leaderboard.js:429	User controlled data in a `lbList.innerHTML` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low]	Static analysis (opengrep)
high	`gitleaks/gcp-api-key`	leaderboard.js:43	Possible gcp-api-key secret in the current tree	Secrets (gitleaks)
high	`opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-document-method`	leaderboard.js:430	User controlled data in methods like `innerHTML`, `outerHTML` or `document.write` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low]	Static analysis (opengrep)
high	`opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-innerhtml`	leaderboard.js:430	User controlled data in a `topTenEl.innerHTML` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low]	Static analysis (opengrep)
medium	`opengrep/javascript.lang.security.html-in-template-string`	game.js:292	This template literal looks like HTML and has interpolated variables. These variables are not HTML-encoded by default. If the variables contain HTML tags, these may be interpreted by the browser, resulting in cross-site scripting (XSS)....	Static analysis (opengrep)
medium	`opengrep/javascript.lang.security.html-in-template-string`	game.js:293	This template literal looks like HTML and has interpolated variables. These variables are not HTML-encoded by default. If the variables contain HTML tags, these may be interpreted by the browser, resulting in cross-site scripting (XSS)....	Static analysis (opengrep)
medium	`opengrep/javascript.lang.security.html-in-template-string`	game.js:294	This template literal looks like HTML and has interpolated variables. These variables are not HTML-encoded by default. If the variables contain HTML tags, these may be interpreted by the browser, resulting in cross-site scripting (XSS)....	Static analysis (opengrep)
medium	`opengrep/javascript.lang.security.html-in-template-string`	game.js:397	This template literal looks like HTML and has interpolated variables. These variables are not HTML-encoded by default. If the variables contain HTML tags, these may be interpreted by the browser, resulting in cross-site scripting (XSS)....	Static analysis (opengrep)
medium	`opengrep/javascript.lang.security.html-in-template-string`	leaderboard.js:127	This template literal looks like HTML and has interpolated variables. These variables are not HTML-encoded by default. If the variables contain HTML tags, these may be interpreted by the browser, resulting in cross-site scripting (XSS)....	Static analysis (opengrep)
low	`gitleaks/generic-api-key`	game.js:1	Possible generic-api-key secret in the current tree	Secrets (gitleaks)
low	`gitleaks/generic-api-key`	index.html:11	Possible generic-api-key secret in the current tree	Secrets (gitleaks)
low	`gitleaks/generic-api-key`	leaderboard.html:12	Possible generic-api-key secret in the current tree	Secrets (gitleaks)
low	`gitleaks/generic-api-key`	leaderboard.js:2	Possible generic-api-key secret in the current tree	Secrets (gitleaks)
low	`gitleaks/generic-api-key`	play.html:11	Possible generic-api-key secret in the current tree	Secrets (gitleaks)
low	`gitleaks/generic-api-key`	social.html:11	Possible generic-api-key secret in the current tree	Secrets (gitleaks)
low	`gitleaks/generic-api-key`	stats.html:12	Possible generic-api-key secret in the current tree	Secrets (gitleaks)
low	`gitleaks/generic-api-key`	ticker-lite.js:2	Possible generic-api-key secret in the current tree	Secrets (gitleaks)

Tools and coverage

Every analyzer that ran on this commit. A failed or skipped tool is a coverage gap: its share of the score is left out and the coverage figure drops.

Analyzer	Pillar	Status	Version	Findings	Note
AI tool configuration	AI provenance	ok	`signatures-v1`	0
Explicit AI attribution	AI provenance	ok	`signatures-v1`	0
Release velocity	AI provenance	skipped	`—`	0
Coding style	AI provenance	ok	`—`	0
Commit velocity	AI provenance	ok	`prov-4`	0
Complexity (lizard)	Code quality	ok	`lizard 1.25.1`	0
Documentation	Code quality	ok	`—`	0
Duplication (jscpd)	Code quality	ok	`repotrust-dup-w6`	0
Lint	Code quality	ok	`opengrep 1.33.1; rules f1d2b562b414`	0
Tests and CI	Code quality	ok	`—`	0
Type safety	Code quality	skipped	`—`	0
CI workflows (zizmor)	Security	skipped	`—`	0
Dependencies (osv-scanner)	Security	skipped	`—`	0
Release downloads	Security	ok	`—`	0
Security posture	Security	ok	`—`	0
Package registries	Security	skipped	`—`	0	no registry dependencies declared
Static analysis (opengrep)	Security	ok	`opengrep 1.33.1; rules f1d2b562b414`	15
OpenSSF Scorecard	Security	skipped	`—`	0	no published OpenSSF Scorecard result for this repo
Secrets (gitleaks)	Security	ok	`gitleaks 8.30.1`	9

Score history

Scores from different scoring versions aren't directly comparable.

Scored	Commit	Scoring	AI provenance	Quality	Security
2026-11-14	`519ba957e567`	`prov-5+qual-2+sec-2`	0%	50	34
2026-11-14	`519ba957e567`	`prov-4+qual-2+sec-2`	0%	50	34

Embed a badge

Maintainers can show these in a README. Badges update when the repository is re-scored.

[![RepoTrust ai](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/badge/github.com/tuffzinc/epstienclickersourceleak/ai.svg)](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/r/github.com/tuffzinc/epstienclickersourceleak/)

[![RepoTrust quality](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/badge/github.com/tuffzinc/epstienclickersourceleak/quality.svg)](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/r/github.com/tuffzinc/epstienclickersourceleak/)

[![RepoTrust security](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/badge/github.com/tuffzinc/epstienclickersourceleak/security.svg)](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/r/github.com/tuffzinc/epstienclickersourceleak/)

Full text report

Repository: https://github.com/tuffzinc/epstienclickersourceleak
Commit: 519ba957e567d2274617c438fc72c6075fbba9eb
Generated: 2026-11-14T14:52:08+00:00
Scorer 0.1.0, scoring prov-5+qual-2+sec-2, report schema v2

Scores

Pillar	Score	Signal	Confidence	Coverage
AI provenance (estimated AI-generated share)	0	none-detected	41%	100%
Code quality	50	poor	90%	100%
Security	34	poor	85%	100%

AI provenance

No AI attribution or AI-consistent velocity signals detected.

Explicitly attributed share (lower bound): 0.0%
Unattributed share in AI-consistent velocity bursts: 0.0%
Estimated AI-generated share: 0.0%

Month	Lines added	Attributed to AI
2026-05	1,840	0%

AI provenance describes how code was produced; it is not a quality judgment. Unless attribution is explicit, these are signals consistent with AI generation, not proof. Squash/rebase workflows, imported code, and rewritten history reduce accuracy.

Code quality

Code quality is poor: test-to-source ratio 0.00, no CI test run detected; 22% of function code in complex or long functions; 0% duplicated lines. Weakest area: testing.

Area	Score
Complexity (lizard)	52
Duplication	100
Code smells (Opengrep)	100
Tests and CI	0
Documentation	20
Type safety	n/a
Process (Scorecard review/maintenance)	n/a

Functions: 143; mean complexity 3.7, 90th percentile 7; 6 complex and 0 long functions
Duplicated lines: 0.0% of 1,399 compared
Tests: 0 test lines for 1,840 source lines (ratio 0.00); CI test commands: none detected; 0% of recent source commits also change tests
Docs missing or thin: readme, license, contributing, changelog

Most complex functions:

Security

Security posture is poor: 1 possible secret(s) in the tree, 0 only in history; 10 high-severity SAST findings. Weakest area: sast.

Area	Score
Secrets (gitleaks, tree + history)	50
Static analysis (Opengrep)	19
Vulnerable dependencies (OSV)	n/a
CI workflows (zizmor)	n/a
Posture (policy, updates, signing, lockfiles)	20
OpenSSF Scorecard	n/a

Posture checks passed: signed commits, lockfiles; missing: security policy, dependency updates

Top findings

Severity	Finding	Location
high	`gitleaks/gcp-api-key`: Possible gcp-api-key secret in the current tree	leaderboard.js:43
high	`opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-document-method`: User controlled data in methods like `innerHTML`, `outerHTML` or `document.write` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low]	game.js:291
high	`opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-innerhtml`: User controlled data in a `left.innerHTML` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low]	game.js:291
high	`opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-document-method`: User controlled data in methods like `innerHTML`, `outerHTML` or `document.write` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low]	game.js:399
high	`opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-innerhtml`: User controlled data in a `breakdownEl.innerHTML` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low]	game.js:399
high	`opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-document-method`: User controlled data in methods like `innerHTML`, `outerHTML` or `document.write` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low]	leaderboard.js:28
high	`opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-innerhtml`: User controlled data in a `el.innerHTML` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low]	leaderboard.js:28
high	`opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-document-method`: User controlled data in methods like `innerHTML`, `outerHTML` or `document.write` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low]	leaderboard.js:429
high	`opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-innerhtml`: User controlled data in a `lbList.innerHTML` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low]	leaderboard.js:429
high	`opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-document-method`: User controlled data in methods like `innerHTML`, `outerHTML` or `document.write` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low]	leaderboard.js:430
high	`opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-innerhtml`: User controlled data in a `topTenEl.innerHTML` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low]	leaderboard.js:430
medium	`opengrep/javascript.lang.security.html-in-template-string`: This template literal looks like HTML and has interpolated variables. These variables are not HTML-encoded by default. If the variables contain HTML tags, these may be interpreted by the browser, resulting in cross-site scripting (XSS). [confidence low]	game.js:292
medium	`opengrep/javascript.lang.security.html-in-template-string`: This template literal looks like HTML and has interpolated variables. These variables are not HTML-encoded by default. If the variables contain HTML tags, these may be interpreted by the browser, resulting in cross-site scripting (XSS). [confidence low]	game.js:293
medium	`opengrep/javascript.lang.security.html-in-template-string`: This template literal looks like HTML and has interpolated variables. These variables are not HTML-encoded by default. If the variables contain HTML tags, these may be interpreted by the browser, resulting in cross-site scripting (XSS). [confidence low]	game.js:294
medium	`opengrep/javascript.lang.security.html-in-template-string`: This template literal looks like HTML and has interpolated variables. These variables are not HTML-encoded by default. If the variables contain HTML tags, these may be interpreted by the browser, resulting in cross-site scripting (XSS). [confidence low]	game.js:397
medium	`opengrep/javascript.lang.security.html-in-template-string`: This template literal looks like HTML and has interpolated variables. These variables are not HTML-encoded by default. If the variables contain HTML tags, these may be interpreted by the browser, resulting in cross-site scripting (XSS). [confidence low]	leaderboard.js:127
low	`gitleaks/generic-api-key`: Possible generic-api-key secret in the current tree	ticker-lite.js:2
low	`gitleaks/generic-api-key`: Possible generic-api-key secret in the current tree	social.html:11
low	`gitleaks/generic-api-key`: Possible generic-api-key secret in the current tree	play.html:11
low	`gitleaks/generic-api-key`: Possible generic-api-key secret in the current tree	leaderboard.html:12
low	`gitleaks/generic-api-key`: Possible generic-api-key secret in the current tree	index.html:11
low	`gitleaks/generic-api-key`: Possible generic-api-key secret in the current tree	stats.html:12
low	`gitleaks/generic-api-key`: Possible generic-api-key secret in the current tree	leaderboard.js:2
low	`gitleaks/generic-api-key`: Possible generic-api-key secret in the current tree	game.js:1

Static signals only: the scorer never runs the project's code. Secret findings are pattern matches that were not verified, and secret values are never stored.

Repository profile

Source lines: 1,840; test lines: 0

Language	Lines
JavaScript	1,840