RepoTrust

Leaderboard github.com

tony-schumacher/ghostty-bar

Vertical tab list for Ghostty in the macOS menu bar: see which Claude Code sessions are working, finished or waiting for you.

  • View repository ↗
  • Swift
  • ★ 0
  • commit 565d82c59c35
  • scored 2026-11-14
  • scoring prov-5+qual-2+sec-2

AI provenance

0%

possible

Confidence
42%
Coverage
100%

Estimated share of AI-generated code. Explicit attribution is a lower bound.

Code quality

68/100

adequate

Confidence
90%
Coverage
100%

Complexity, duplication, lint density, tests, CI, docs and review process.

Security

78/100

adequate

Confidence
85%
Coverage
100%

Secrets, static analysis, vulnerable dependencies, CI and supply-chain posture.

AI provenance

0% possible

Weak signals consistent with AI-assisted development. Comments and strings use phrasing typical of LLM-written code (see the coding style evidence).

How the score is built

  • Explicitly attributed share0%
  • Unattributed share in AI-pace bursts0%
  • Estimated AI-generated share0%
  • AI tool configuration files0
  • Work sessions at AI pace0
  • Releases at AI pace0
  • Coding-style index (1.0+ means possible)1.03

Lines added per month all AI-attributed share

  1. 2026-112,513 · 0% AI

Evidence by analyzer

Explicit AI attributionok
attributed_commit_share
0.0%
attributed_commits
0
attributed_loc
0
attributed_loc_share
0.0%
commits
8
effective_loc
2,513
tools_detected
0
AI tool configurationok
artifacts
0
tools_configured
0
workflow_agents
0
Commit velocityok
excluded_import_loc
0
flagged_loc
0
flagged_loc_share
0.0%
flagged_units
0
max_loc_per_hour
813.19
measured_loc
2,513
median_loc_per_hour
605.75
pr_timed_units
1
pre_ai_era_burst_loc
0
pre_ai_era_bursts
0
pre_ai_era_measured_loc
0
work_units
3
Release velocityok
flagged_releases
0
max_loc_per_day
18,312
releases
1
Coding styleok
count:assistant_voice
0
count:emoji_in_code
5
count:narrated_steps
0
count:placeholder
0
files:assistant_voice
0
files:emoji_in_code
3
files:narrated_steps
0
files:placeholder
0
index
1.03
lines_scanned
2,422
per_kloc:assistant_voice
0
per_kloc:emoji_in_code
2.06
per_kloc:narrated_steps
0
per_kloc:placeholder
0

Code quality

68 adequate

Code quality is adequate: test-to-source ratio 0.00, no CI test run detected; 9% of function code in complex or long functions; 0% duplicated lines. Weakest area: testing.

How the score is built

  • Complexity76
  • Duplication100
  • Lint and smells100
  • Tests and CI15
  • Documentation85
  • Type safetynot measured
  • Review processnot measured

Evidence by analyzer

Complexity (lizard)ok3 items
complex_functions
3
function_nloc
1,502
functions
179
long_functions
0
many_param_functions
0
mean_ccn
3.03
p90_ccn
7
risky_nloc_share
9.3%
Duplication (jscpd)ok
compared_lines
1,843
duplicated_lines
0
duplicated_share
0.0%
files
9
Lintok
findings
0
scanned_lines
2,422
weighted_findings
0
Tests and CIok2 items
  • CI config: .github/workflows/build.yml .github/workflows/build.yml
  • CI config: .github/workflows/release.yml .github/workflows/release.yml
check:ci_present
yes
check:ci_runs_lint
no
check:ci_runs_tests
no
check:has_tests
no
check:test_ratio
no
check:tests_cochange
no
ci_files
2
cochange_commits
7
cochange_share
0.0%
source_lines
2,422
test_lines
0
test_ratio
0
Documentationok3 items
  • README.md README.md
  • LICENSE LICENSE
  • CHANGELOG.md CHANGELOG.md
check:changelog
yes
check:contributing
no
check:license
yes
check:readme
yes
readme_lines
243
Type safetyskipped

Security

78 adequate

Security posture is adequate: 2 high-severity workflow issues. Weakest area: posture.

How the score is built

  • Secrets100
  • Static analysis (SAST)100
  • Vulnerable dependenciesnot measured
  • CI workflows62
  • Security posture0
  • OpenSSF Scorecardnot measured

Evidence by analyzer

OpenSSF Scorecardskipped

no published OpenSSF Scorecard result for this repo

Package registriesskipped

no registry dependencies declared

Secrets (gitleaks)ok
secrets_current
0
secrets_history
0
secrets_low_confidence
0
secrets_nonprod
0
Static analysis (opengrep)ok
findings
0
findings_high
0
findings_low
0
findings_medium
0
parse_errors
1
scanned_lines
2,422
weighted_findings
0
Dependencies (osv-scanner)skipped
CI workflows (zizmor)ok
findings
5
findings_high
2
findings_low
0
findings_medium
3
penalty
28.80
workflows
2
Security postureok
check:dependency_updates
no
check:lockfiles
yes
check:security_policy
no
check:signed_commits
no
signed_commit_share
12.5%
unpinned_manifests
0
Release downloadsok2 items
binary_assets
2
signals
1
suspicious
0

Findings

2 high3 medium

SeverityRuleLocationMessageTool
high zizmor/unpinned-uses .github/workflows/build.yml:11 unpinned action reference [confidence high] CI workflows (zizmor)
high zizmor/unpinned-uses .github/workflows/release.yml:15 unpinned action reference [confidence high] CI workflows (zizmor)
medium zizmor/artipacked .github/workflows/build.yml:11 credential persistence through GitHub Actions artifacts [confidence low] CI workflows (zizmor)
medium zizmor/excessive-permissions .github/workflows/build.yml:8 overly broad permissions [confidence medium] CI workflows (zizmor)
medium zizmor/artipacked .github/workflows/release.yml:15 credential persistence through GitHub Actions artifacts [confidence low] CI workflows (zizmor)

Tools and coverage

Every analyzer that ran on this commit. A failed or skipped tool is a coverage gap: its share of the score is left out and the coverage figure drops.

AnalyzerPillarStatusVersionFindingsNote
AI tool configurationAI provenanceoksignatures-v10
Explicit AI attributionAI provenanceoksignatures-v10
Release velocityAI provenanceokprov-40
Coding styleAI provenanceok—0
Commit velocityAI provenanceokprov-40
Complexity (lizard)Code qualityoklizard 1.25.10
DocumentationCode qualityok—0
Duplication (jscpd)Code qualityokrepotrust-dup-w60
LintCode qualityokopengrep 1.33.1; rules f1d2b562b4140
Tests and CICode qualityok—0
Type safetyCode qualityskipped—0
CI workflows (zizmor)Securityokzizmor 1.32.05
Dependencies (osv-scanner)Securityskipped—0
Release downloadsSecurityok—0
Security postureSecurityok—0
Package registriesSecurityskipped—0no registry dependencies declared
Static analysis (opengrep)Securityokopengrep 1.33.1; rules f1d2b562b4140
OpenSSF ScorecardSecurityskipped—0no published OpenSSF Scorecard result for this repo
Secrets (gitleaks)Securityokgitleaks 8.30.10

Score history

Scores from different scoring versions aren't directly comparable.

ScoredCommitScoringAI provenanceQualitySecurity
2026-11-14565d82c59c35prov-5+qual-2+sec-20%6878
2026-11-14565d82c59c35prov-4+qual-2+sec-20%6878

Embed a badge

Maintainers can show these in a README. Badges update when the repository is re-scored.

[![RepoTrust ai](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/badge/github.com/tony-schumacher/ghostty-bar/ai.svg)](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/r/github.com/tony-schumacher/ghostty-bar/)
[![RepoTrust quality](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/badge/github.com/tony-schumacher/ghostty-bar/quality.svg)](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/r/github.com/tony-schumacher/ghostty-bar/)
[![RepoTrust security](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/badge/github.com/tony-schumacher/ghostty-bar/security.svg)](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/r/github.com/tony-schumacher/ghostty-bar/)
Full text report

Scores

Pillar Score Signal Confidence Coverage
AI provenance (estimated AI-generated share) 0 possible 42% 100%
Code quality 68 adequate 90% 100%
Security 78 adequate 85% 100%

AI provenance

Weak signals consistent with AI-assisted development. Comments and strings use phrasing typical of LLM-written code (see the coding style evidence).

  • Explicitly attributed share (lower bound): 0.0%

  • Unattributed share in AI-consistent velocity bursts: 0.0%

  • Estimated AI-generated share: 0.0%

  • Stylometry index: 1.03 per 1,000 lines (narrated steps 0, placeholders 0, assistant phrasing 0, emoji 5). Reported as a signal, not scored.

Month Lines added Attributed to AI
2026-11 2,513 0%

AI provenance describes how code was produced; it is not a quality judgment. Unless attribution is explicit, these are signals consistent with AI generation, not proof. Squash/rebase workflows, imported code, and rewritten history reduce accuracy.

Code quality

Code quality is adequate: test-to-source ratio 0.00, no CI test run detected; 9% of function code in complex or long functions; 0% duplicated lines. Weakest area: testing.

Area Score
Complexity (lizard) 76
Duplication 100
Code smells (Opengrep) 100
Tests and CI 15
Documentation 85
Type safety n/a
Process (Scorecard review/maintenance) n/a
  • Functions: 179; mean complexity 3.0, 90th percentile 7; 3 complex and 0 long functions
  • Duplicated lines: 0.0% of 1,843 compared
  • Tests: 0 test lines for 2,422 source lines (ratio 0.00); CI test commands: none detected; 0% of recent source commits also change tests
  • Docs missing or thin: contributing

Most complex functions:

Security

Security posture is adequate: 2 high-severity workflow issues. Weakest area: posture.

Area Score
Secrets (gitleaks, tree + history) 100
Static analysis (Opengrep) 100
Vulnerable dependencies (OSV) n/a
CI workflows (zizmor) 62
Posture (policy, updates, signing, lockfiles) 0
OpenSSF Scorecard n/a
  • Posture checks passed: lockfiles; missing: security policy, dependency updates, signed commits

Top findings

Severity Finding Location
high zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] .github/workflows/build.yml:11
high zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] .github/workflows/release.yml:15
medium zizmor/artipacked: credential persistence through GitHub Actions artifacts [confidence low] .github/workflows/build.yml:11
medium zizmor/excessive-permissions: overly broad permissions [confidence medium] .github/workflows/build.yml:8
medium zizmor/artipacked: credential persistence through GitHub Actions artifacts [confidence low] .github/workflows/release.yml:15

Static signals only: the scorer never runs the project's code. Secret findings are pattern matches that were not verified, and secret values are never stored.

Distribution signals

Signals consistent with a repository that exists to distribute a download. They are heuristics, not a verdict; release files were not downloaded or inspected.

Repository profile

  • Source lines: 2,422; test lines: 0
Language Lines
Swift 2,228
Shell 194