Leaderboard github.com
tessalt/echo-chamber-js
Commenting without the comments
AI provenance
0%
none-detected
- Confidence
- 51%
- Coverage
- 100%
Estimated share of AI-generated code. Explicit attribution is a lower bound.
Code quality
46/100
poor
- Confidence
- 90%
- Coverage
- 100%
Complexity, duplication, lint density, tests, CI, docs and review process.
Security
48/100
poor
- Confidence
- 85%
- Coverage
- 100%
Secrets, static analysis, vulnerable dependencies, CI and supply-chain posture.
AI provenance
0% none-detected
No AI attribution or AI-consistent velocity signals detected.
How the score is built
- Explicitly attributed share0%
- Unattributed share in AI-pace bursts0%
- Estimated AI-generated share0%
- AI tool configuration files0
- Work sessions at AI pace0
- Releases at AI pacenot measured
- Coding-style index (1.0+ means possible)0.00
Lines added per month all AI-attributed share
- 2015-0410,079 · 0% AI
- 2015-05984 · 0% AI
- 2015-0751 · 0% AI
Evidence by analyzer
Explicit AI attributionok
- attributed_commit_share
- 0.0%
- attributed_commits
- 0
- attributed_loc
- 0
- attributed_loc_share
- 0.0%
- commits
- 44
- effective_loc
- 11,114
- tools_detected
- 0
AI tool configurationok
- artifacts
- 0
- tools_configured
- 0
- workflow_agents
- 0
Commit velocityok
- excluded_import_loc
- 0
- flagged_loc
- 0
- flagged_loc_share
- 0.0%
- flagged_units
- 0
- max_loc_per_hour
- 5,037.01
- measured_loc
- 11,114
- median_loc_per_hour
- 149.84
- pr_timed_units
- 0
- pre_ai_era_burst_loc
- 9,014
- pre_ai_era_bursts
- 2
- pre_ai_era_measured_loc
- 11,114
- work_units
- 20
Release velocityskipped
Coding styleok
- count:assistant_voice
- 0
- count:emoji_in_code
- 0
- count:narrated_steps
- 0
- count:placeholder
- 0
- files:assistant_voice
- 0
- files:emoji_in_code
- 0
- files:narrated_steps
- 0
- files:placeholder
- 0
- index
- 0
- lines_scanned
- 1,237
- per_kloc:assistant_voice
- 0
- per_kloc:emoji_in_code
- 0
- per_kloc:narrated_steps
- 0
- per_kloc:placeholder
- 0
Code quality
46 poor
Code quality is poor: test-to-source ratio 0.00, no CI test run detected; 0% of function code in complex or long functions; 96% duplicated lines. Weakest area: testing.
How the score is built
- Complexity100
- Duplication0
- Lint and smells100
- Tests and CI0
- Documentation40
- Type safetynot measured
- Review processnot measured
Evidence by analyzer
Complexity (lizard)ok
- complex_functions
- 0
- function_nloc
- 1,101
- functions
- 134
- long_functions
- 0
- many_param_functions
- 0
- mean_ccn
- 1.51
- p90_ccn
- 3
- risky_nloc_share
- 0.0%
Duplication (jscpd)ok7 items
- 6+ duplicated lines: bundle.js:13 and src/author.js:12
- 6+ duplicated lines: bundle.js:44 and src/comment.js:1
- 6+ duplicated lines: bundle.js:91 and src/comment_list.js:1
- 6+ duplicated lines: bundle.js:169 and src/echo_chamber.js:1
- 6+ duplicated lines: bundle.js:285 and src/form.js:1
- 6+ duplicated lines: bundle.js:396 and src/md5.js:1
- 6+ duplicated lines: bundle.js:600 and entry.js:1
- compared_lines
- 909
- duplicated_lines
- 872
- duplicated_share
- 95.9%
- files
- 11
Lintok
- findings
- 0
- scanned_lines
- 1,237
- weighted_findings
- 0
Tests and CIok
- check:ci_present
- no
- check:ci_runs_lint
- no
- check:ci_runs_tests
- no
- check:has_tests
- no
- check:test_ratio
- no
- check:tests_cochange
- no
- ci_files
- 0
- cochange_commits
- 32
- cochange_share
- 0.0%
- source_lines
- 1,237
- test_lines
- 0
- test_ratio
- 0
Documentationok1 item
- readme.md
readme.md
- check:changelog
- no
- check:contributing
- no
- check:license
- no
- check:readme
- yes
- readme_lines
- 63
Type safetyskipped
Security
48 poor
Security posture is poor: 12 high-severity SAST findings. Weakest area: posture.
How the score is built
- Secrets100
- Static analysis (SAST)8
- Vulnerable dependenciesnot measured
- CI workflowsnot measured
- Security posture0
- OpenSSF Scorecardnot measured
Evidence by analyzer
OpenSSF Scorecardskipped
no published OpenSSF Scorecard result for this repo
Package registriesok
- checked
- 3
- declared
- 3
- lookup_errors
- 0
- missing
- 0
- recent
- 0
Secrets (gitleaks)ok
- secrets_current
- 0
- secrets_history
- 0
- secrets_low_confidence
- 0
- secrets_nonprod
- 0
Static analysis (opengrep)ok
- findings
- 12
- findings_high
- 12
- findings_low
- 0
- findings_medium
- 0
- parse_errors
- 0
- scanned_lines
- 1,237
- weighted_findings
- 9
Dependencies (osv-scanner)skipped
CI workflows (zizmor)skipped
Security postureok1 item
- package.json has no lockfile alongside it (unpinned dependencies)
package.json
- check:dependency_updates
- no
- check:lockfiles
- no
- check:security_policy
- no
- check:signed_commits
- no
- signed_commit_share
- 0.0%
- unpinned_manifests
- 1
Release downloadsok
- binary_assets
- 0
- signals
- 0
- suspicious
- 0
Findings
12 high
12 findings
| Severity | Rule | Location | Message | Tool |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| high | opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-document-method |
bundle.js:124 | User controlled data in methods like `innerHTML`, `outerHTML` or `document.write` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| high | opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-innerhtml |
bundle.js:124 | User controlled data in a `this.list.innerHTML` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| high | opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-document-method |
bundle.js:125 | User controlled data in methods like `innerHTML`, `outerHTML` or `document.write` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| high | opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-innerhtml |
bundle.js:125 | User controlled data in a `this.form.firstChild.innerHTML` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| high | opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-document-method |
bundle.js:343 | User controlled data in methods like `innerHTML`, `outerHTML` or `document.write` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| high | opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-innerhtml |
bundle.js:343 | User controlled data in a `msg.innerHTML` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| high | opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-document-method |
src/comment_list.js:34 | User controlled data in methods like `innerHTML`, `outerHTML` or `document.write` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| high | opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-innerhtml |
src/comment_list.js:34 | User controlled data in a `this.list.innerHTML` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| high | opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-document-method |
src/comment_list.js:35 | User controlled data in methods like `innerHTML`, `outerHTML` or `document.write` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| high | opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-innerhtml |
src/comment_list.js:35 | User controlled data in a `this.form.firstChild.innerHTML` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| high | opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-document-method |
src/form.js:59 | User controlled data in methods like `innerHTML`, `outerHTML` or `document.write` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| high | opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-innerhtml |
src/form.js:59 | User controlled data in a `msg.innerHTML` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] | Static analysis (opengrep) |
Tools and coverage
Every analyzer that ran on this commit. A failed or skipped tool is a coverage gap: its share of the score is left out and the coverage figure drops.
| Analyzer | Pillar | Status | Version | Findings | Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI tool configuration | AI provenance | ok | signatures-v1 | 0 | |
| Explicit AI attribution | AI provenance | ok | signatures-v1 | 0 | |
| Release velocity | AI provenance | skipped | — | 0 | |
| Coding style | AI provenance | ok | — | 0 | |
| Commit velocity | AI provenance | ok | prov-4 | 0 | |
| Complexity (lizard) | Code quality | ok | lizard 1.25.1 | 0 | |
| Documentation | Code quality | ok | — | 0 | |
| Duplication (jscpd) | Code quality | ok | repotrust-dup-w6 | 0 | |
| Lint | Code quality | ok | opengrep 1.33.1; rules f1d2b562b414 | 0 | |
| Tests and CI | Code quality | ok | — | 0 | |
| Type safety | Code quality | skipped | — | 0 | |
| CI workflows (zizmor) | Security | skipped | — | 0 | |
| Dependencies (osv-scanner) | Security | skipped | — | 0 | |
| Release downloads | Security | ok | — | 0 | |
| Security posture | Security | ok | — | 0 | |
| Package registries | Security | ok | — | 0 | |
| Static analysis (opengrep) | Security | ok | opengrep 1.33.1; rules f1d2b562b414 | 12 | |
| OpenSSF Scorecard | Security | skipped | — | 0 | no published OpenSSF Scorecard result for this repo |
| Secrets (gitleaks) | Security | ok | gitleaks 8.30.1 | 0 |
Score history
Scores from different scoring versions aren't directly comparable.
| Scored | Commit | Scoring | AI provenance | Quality | Security |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-11-14 | c29dd91c1c0d | prov-5+qual-2+sec-2 | 0% | 46 | 48 |
| 2026-11-14 | c29dd91c1c0d | prov-4+qual-2+sec-2 | 0% | 46 | 48 |
Full text report
- Repository: https://github.com/tessalt/echo-chamber-js
- Commit:
c29dd91c1c0d41fb5166fdc883085c8bd93d3e02 - Generated: 2026-11-14T14:52:07+00:00
- Scorer 0.1.0, scoring prov-5+qual-2+sec-2, report schema v2
Scores
| Pillar | Score | Signal | Confidence | Coverage |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI provenance (estimated AI-generated share) | 0 | none-detected | 51% | 100% |
| Code quality | 46 | poor | 90% | 100% |
| Security | 48 | poor | 85% | 100% |
AI provenance
No AI attribution or AI-consistent velocity signals detected.
- Explicitly attributed share (lower bound): 0.0%
- Unattributed share in AI-consistent velocity bursts: 0.0%
- Estimated AI-generated share: 0.0%
| Month | Lines added | Attributed to AI |
|---|---|---|
| 2015-04 | 10,079 | 0% |
| 2015-05 | 984 | 0% |
| 2015-07 | 51 | 0% |
AI provenance describes how code was produced; it is not a quality judgment. Unless attribution is explicit, these are signals consistent with AI generation, not proof. Squash/rebase workflows, imported code, and rewritten history reduce accuracy.
Code quality
Code quality is poor: test-to-source ratio 0.00, no CI test run detected; 0% of function code in complex or long functions; 96% duplicated lines. Weakest area: testing.
| Area | Score |
|---|---|
| Complexity (lizard) | 100 |
| Duplication | 0 |
| Code smells (Opengrep) | 100 |
| Tests and CI | 0 |
| Documentation | 40 |
| Type safety | n/a |
| Process (Scorecard review/maintenance) | n/a |
- Functions: 134; mean complexity 1.5, 90th percentile 3; 0 complex and 0 long functions
- Duplicated lines: 95.9% of 909 compared
- Tests: 0 test lines for 1,237 source lines (ratio 0.00); CI test commands: none detected; 0% of recent source commits also change tests
- Docs missing or thin: license, contributing, changelog
Security
Security posture is poor: 12 high-severity SAST findings. Weakest area: posture.
| Area | Score |
|---|---|
| Secrets (gitleaks, tree + history) | 100 |
| Static analysis (Opengrep) | 8 |
| Vulnerable dependencies (OSV) | n/a |
| CI workflows (zizmor) | n/a |
| Posture (policy, updates, signing, lockfiles) | 0 |
| OpenSSF Scorecard | n/a |
- Posture checks passed: none; missing: security policy, dependency updates, signed commits, lockfiles
Top findings
| Severity | Finding | Location |
|---|---|---|
| high | opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-document-method: User controlled data in methods like innerHTML, outerHTML or document.write is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] |
bundle.js:124 |
| high | opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-innerhtml: User controlled data in a this.list.innerHTML is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] |
bundle.js:124 |
| high | opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-document-method: User controlled data in methods like innerHTML, outerHTML or document.write is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] |
bundle.js:125 |
| high | opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-innerhtml: User controlled data in a this.form.firstChild.innerHTML is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] |
bundle.js:125 |
| high | opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-document-method: User controlled data in methods like innerHTML, outerHTML or document.write is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] |
bundle.js:343 |
| high | opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-innerhtml: User controlled data in a msg.innerHTML is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] |
bundle.js:343 |
| high | opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-document-method: User controlled data in methods like innerHTML, outerHTML or document.write is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] |
src/comment_list.js:34 |
| high | opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-innerhtml: User controlled data in a this.list.innerHTML is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] |
src/comment_list.js:34 |
| high | opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-document-method: User controlled data in methods like innerHTML, outerHTML or document.write is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] |
src/comment_list.js:35 |
| high | opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-innerhtml: User controlled data in a this.form.firstChild.innerHTML is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] |
src/comment_list.js:35 |
| high | opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-document-method: User controlled data in methods like innerHTML, outerHTML or document.write is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] |
src/form.js:59 |
| high | opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-innerhtml: User controlled data in a msg.innerHTML is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] |
src/form.js:59 |
Static signals only: the scorer never runs the project's code. Secret findings are pattern matches that were not verified, and secret values are never stored.
Repository profile
- Source lines: 1,237; test lines: 0
| Language | Lines |
|---|---|
| JavaScript | 1,223 |
| Shell | 14 |