RepoTrust

Leaderboard github.com

tbranyen/backbone-boilerplate

A workflow for building Backbone applications.

  • View repository ↗
  • JavaScript
  • ★ 4,435
  • commit 604643b03023
  • scored 2026-11-14
  • scoring prov-5+qual-2+sec-2

AI provenance

0%

none-detected

Confidence
65%
Coverage
100%

Estimated share of AI-generated code. Explicit attribution is a lower bound.

Code quality

75/100

adequate

Confidence
90%
Coverage
100%

Complexity, duplication, lint density, tests, CI, docs and review process.

Security

70/100

adequate

Confidence
85%
Coverage
100%

Secrets, static analysis, vulnerable dependencies, CI and supply-chain posture.

AI provenance

0% none-detected

No AI attribution or AI-consistent velocity signals detected.

How the score is built

  • Explicitly attributed share0%
  • Unattributed share in AI-pace bursts0%
  • Estimated AI-generated share0%
  • AI tool configuration files0
  • Work sessions at AI pace0
  • Releases at AI pace0
  • Coding-style index (1.0+ means possible)0.00

Lines added per month all AI-attributed share

  1. 2012-01930 · 0% AI
  2. 2012-02479 · 0% AI
  3. 2012-03210 · 0% AI
  4. 2012-04174 · 0% AI
  5. 2012-05136 · 0% AI
  6. 2012-06942 · 0% AI
  7. 2012-0786 · 0% AI
  8. 2012-08417 · 0% AI
  9. 2012-0923 · 0% AI
  10. 2012-10509 · 0% AI
  11. 2012-11138 · 0% AI
  12. 2012-1227 · 0% AI
  13. 2013-014 · 0% AI
  14. 2013-02452 · 0% AI
  15. 2013-03149 · 0% AI
  16. 2013-04506 · 0% AI
  17. 2013-0568 · 0% AI
  18. 2013-06306 · 0% AI
  19. 2013-07171 · 0% AI
  20. 2013-08200 · 0% AI
  21. 2013-09192 · 0% AI
  22. 2013-1022 · 0% AI
  23. 2013-112 · 0% AI
  24. 2013-120 · 0% AI
  25. 2014-011 · 0% AI
  26. 2014-022 · 0% AI
  27. 2014-030 · 0% AI
  28. 2014-0632 · 0% AI
  29. 2014-080 · 0% AI
  30. 2014-120 · 0% AI
  31. 2015-081,486 · 0% AI
  32. 2015-100 · 0% AI
  33. 2016-012 · 0% AI
  34. 2016-030 · 0% AI
  35. 2016-050 · 0% AI
  36. 2017-0336 · 0% AI
  37. 2017-060 · 0% AI
  38. 2017-070 · 0% AI

Evidence by analyzer

Explicit AI attributionok
attributed_commit_share
0.0%
attributed_commits
0
attributed_loc
0
attributed_loc_share
0.0%
commits
406
effective_loc
7,702
tools_detected
0
AI tool configurationok
artifacts
0
tools_configured
0
workflow_agents
0
Commit velocityok
excluded_import_loc
0
flagged_loc
0
flagged_loc_share
0.0%
flagged_units
0
max_loc_per_hour
254.91
measured_loc
7,702
median_loc_per_hour
41.18
pr_timed_units
0
pre_ai_era_burst_loc
0
pre_ai_era_bursts
0
pre_ai_era_measured_loc
7,702
work_units
148
Release velocityok
flagged_releases
0
max_loc_per_day
9.50
releases
1
Coding styleok
count:assistant_voice
0
count:emoji_in_code
0
count:narrated_steps
0
count:placeholder
0
files:assistant_voice
0
files:emoji_in_code
0
files:narrated_steps
0
files:placeholder
0
index
0
lines_scanned
185
per_kloc:assistant_voice
0
per_kloc:emoji_in_code
0
per_kloc:narrated_steps
0
per_kloc:placeholder
0

Code quality

75 adequate

Code quality is adequate: test-to-source ratio 6.17, no CI test run detected; 0% of function code in complex or long functions; 0% duplicated lines. Weakest area: process.

How the score is built

  • Complexity100
  • Duplication100
  • Lint and smells78
  • Tests and CI65
  • Documentation80
  • Type safetynot measured
  • Review process5

Evidence by analyzer

Complexity (lizard)ok
complex_functions
0
function_nloc
80
functions
17
long_functions
0
many_param_functions
0
mean_ccn
1.41
p90_ccn
2
risky_nloc_share
0.0%
Duplication (jscpd)ok
compared_lines
98
duplicated_lines
0
duplicated_share
0.0%
files
5
Lintok
category:best-practice
1
findings
1
scanned_lines
185
weighted_findings
1
Tests and CIok1 item
  • CI config: .travis.yml .travis.yml
check:ci_present
yes
check:ci_runs_lint
no
check:ci_runs_tests
no
check:has_tests
yes
check:test_ratio
yes
check:tests_cochange
no
ci_files
1
cochange_commits
155
cochange_share
12.9%
source_lines
185
test_lines
1,142
test_ratio
6.17
Documentationok3 items
  • README.md README.md
  • LICENSE LICENSE
  • CONTRIBUTING.md CONTRIBUTING.md
check:changelog
no
check:contributing
yes
check:license
yes
check:readme
yes
readme_lines
78
Type safetyskipped

Security

70 adequate

Security posture is adequate: no high-impact findings. Weakest area: posture.

How the score is built

  • Secrets100
  • Static analysis (SAST)92
  • Vulnerable dependenciesnot measured
  • CI workflowsnot measured
  • Security posture0
  • OpenSSF Scorecard25

Evidence by analyzer

OpenSSF Scorecardok9 items
aggregate
2.10
check:Binary-Artifacts
yes
check:Branch-Protection
no
check:CII-Best-Practices
no
check:Code-Review
yes
check:Fuzzing
no
check:License
yes
check:Maintained
no
check:SAST
no
check:Security-Policy
no
Package registriesok
checked
26
declared
26
lookup_errors
0
missing
0
recent
0
Secrets (gitleaks)ok
secrets_current
0
secrets_history
0
secrets_low_confidence
0
secrets_nonprod
0
Static analysis (opengrep)ok
findings
1
findings_high
0
findings_low
0
findings_medium
1
parse_errors
0
scanned_lines
185
weighted_findings
0.25
Dependencies (osv-scanner)skipped
CI workflows (zizmor)skipped
Security postureok1 item
  • package.json has no lockfile alongside it (unpinned dependencies) package.json
check:dependency_updates
no
check:lockfiles
no
check:security_policy
no
check:signed_commits
no
signed_commit_share
0.0%
unpinned_manifests
1
Release downloadsok
binary_assets
0
signals
0
suspicious
0

Findings

2 medium

SeverityRuleLocationMessageTool
medium opengrep/javascript.lang.best-practice.lazy-load-module app/views/pages/home.js:11 Lazy loading can complicate code bundling if care is not taken, also `require`s are run synchronously by Node.js. If they are called from within a function, it may block other requests from being handled at a more critical time. The... Lint
medium opengrep/javascript.jquery.security.audit.jquery-insecure-selector app/component.js:117 User controlled data in a `$(...)` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] Static analysis (opengrep)

Tools and coverage

Every analyzer that ran on this commit. A failed or skipped tool is a coverage gap: its share of the score is left out and the coverage figure drops.

AnalyzerPillarStatusVersionFindingsNote
AI tool configurationAI provenanceoksignatures-v10
Explicit AI attributionAI provenanceoksignatures-v10
Release velocityAI provenanceokprov-40
Coding styleAI provenanceok—0
Commit velocityAI provenanceokprov-40
Complexity (lizard)Code qualityoklizard 1.25.10
DocumentationCode qualityok—0
Duplication (jscpd)Code qualityokrepotrust-dup-w60
LintCode qualityokopengrep 1.33.1; rules f1d2b562b4141
Tests and CICode qualityok—0
Type safetyCode qualityskipped—0
CI workflows (zizmor)Securityskipped—0
Dependencies (osv-scanner)Securityskipped—0
Release downloadsSecurityok—0
Security postureSecurityok—0
Package registriesSecurityok—0
Static analysis (opengrep)Securityokopengrep 1.33.1; rules f1d2b562b4141
OpenSSF ScorecardSecurityokscorecard v5.6.00
Secrets (gitleaks)Securityokgitleaks 8.30.10

Score history

Scores from different scoring versions aren't directly comparable.

ScoredCommitScoringAI provenanceQualitySecurity
2026-11-14604643b03023prov-5+qual-2+sec-20%7570
2026-11-14604643b03023prov-4+qual-2+sec-20%7570

Embed a badge

Maintainers can show these in a README. Badges update when the repository is re-scored.

[![RepoTrust ai](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/badge/github.com/tbranyen/backbone-boilerplate/ai.svg)](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/r/github.com/tbranyen/backbone-boilerplate/)
[![RepoTrust quality](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/badge/github.com/tbranyen/backbone-boilerplate/quality.svg)](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/r/github.com/tbranyen/backbone-boilerplate/)
[![RepoTrust security](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/badge/github.com/tbranyen/backbone-boilerplate/security.svg)](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/r/github.com/tbranyen/backbone-boilerplate/)
Full text report

Scores

Pillar Score Signal Confidence Coverage
AI provenance (estimated AI-generated share) 0 none-detected 65% 100%
Code quality 75 adequate 90% 100%
Security 70 adequate 85% 100%

AI provenance

No AI attribution or AI-consistent velocity signals detected.

  • Explicitly attributed share (lower bound): 0.0%
  • Unattributed share in AI-consistent velocity bursts: 0.0%
  • Estimated AI-generated share: 0.0%
Month Lines added Attributed to AI
2013-06 306 0%
2013-07 171 0%
2013-08 200 0%
2013-09 192 0%
2013-10 22 0%
2013-11 2 0%
2014-01 1 0%
2014-02 2 0%
2014-06 32 0%
2015-08 1,486 0%
2016-01 2 0%
2017-03 36 0%

AI provenance describes how code was produced; it is not a quality judgment. Unless attribution is explicit, these are signals consistent with AI generation, not proof. Squash/rebase workflows, imported code, and rewritten history reduce accuracy.

Code quality

Code quality is adequate: test-to-source ratio 6.17, no CI test run detected; 0% of function code in complex or long functions; 0% duplicated lines. Weakest area: process.

Area Score
Complexity (lizard) 100
Duplication 100
Code smells (Opengrep) 78
Tests and CI 65
Documentation 80
Type safety n/a
Process (Scorecard review/maintenance) 5
  • Functions: 17; mean complexity 1.4, 90th percentile 2; 0 complex and 0 long functions
  • Duplicated lines: 0.0% of 98 compared
  • Tests: 1,142 test lines for 185 source lines (ratio 6.17); CI test commands: none detected; 13% of recent source commits also change tests
  • Docs missing or thin: changelog

Security

Security posture is adequate: no high-impact findings. Weakest area: posture.

Area Score
Secrets (gitleaks, tree + history) 100
Static analysis (Opengrep) 92
Vulnerable dependencies (OSV) n/a
CI workflows (zizmor) n/a
Posture (policy, updates, signing, lockfiles) 0
OpenSSF Scorecard 25
  • Posture checks passed: none; missing: security policy, dependency updates, signed commits, lockfiles
  • OpenSSF Scorecard aggregate: 2.1/10 (published 2026-11-09)

Top findings

Severity Finding Location
medium opengrep/javascript.jquery.security.audit.jquery-insecure-selector: User controlled data in a $(...) is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] app/component.js:117

Static signals only: the scorer never runs the project's code. Secret findings are pattern matches that were not verified, and secret values are never stored.

Repository profile

  • Source lines: 185; test lines: 1,142
Language Lines
JavaScript 1,327