Leaderboard github.com
szielina/pinheat
AI provenance
0%
none-detected
- Confidence
- 60%
- Coverage
- 100%
Estimated share of AI-generated code. Explicit attribution is a lower bound.
Code quality
65/100
adequate
- Confidence
- 90%
- Coverage
- 100%
Complexity, duplication, lint density, tests, CI, docs and review process.
Security
76/100
adequate
- Confidence
- 85%
- Coverage
- 100%
Secrets, static analysis, vulnerable dependencies, CI and supply-chain posture.
AI provenance
0% none-detected
No AI attribution or AI-consistent velocity signals detected.
How the score is built
- Explicitly attributed share0%
- Unattributed share in AI-pace bursts0%
- Estimated AI-generated share0%
- AI tool configuration files0
- Work sessions at AI pace0
- Releases at AI pacenot measured
- Coding-style index (1.0+ means possible)0.00
Lines added per month all AI-attributed share
- 2026-105,248 · 0% AI
- 2026-114 · 0% AI
Evidence by analyzer
Explicit AI attributionok
- attributed_commit_share
- 0.0%
- attributed_commits
- 0
- attributed_loc
- 0
- attributed_loc_share
- 0.0%
- commits
- 79
- effective_loc
- 5,252
- tools_detected
- 0
AI tool configurationok
- artifacts
- 0
- tools_configured
- 0
- workflow_agents
- 0
Commit velocityok
- excluded_import_loc
- 0
- flagged_loc
- 0
- flagged_loc_share
- 0.0%
- flagged_units
- 0
- max_loc_per_hour
- 245.06
- measured_loc
- 5,252
- median_loc_per_hour
- 66.67
- pr_timed_units
- 0
- pre_ai_era_burst_loc
- 0
- pre_ai_era_bursts
- 0
- pre_ai_era_measured_loc
- 0
- work_units
- 21
Release velocityskipped
Coding styleok
- count:assistant_voice
- 0
- count:emoji_in_code
- 0
- count:narrated_steps
- 0
- count:placeholder
- 0
- files:assistant_voice
- 0
- files:emoji_in_code
- 0
- files:narrated_steps
- 0
- files:placeholder
- 0
- index
- 0
- lines_scanned
- 3,601
- per_kloc:assistant_voice
- 0
- per_kloc:emoji_in_code
- 0
- per_kloc:narrated_steps
- 0
- per_kloc:placeholder
- 0
Code quality
65 adequate
Code quality is adequate: test-to-source ratio 0.00, no CI test run detected; 6% of function code in complex or long functions; 0% duplicated lines. Weakest area: testing.
How the score is built
- Complexity83
- Duplication100
- Lint and smells97
- Tests and CI15
- Documentation40
- Type safety100
- Review processnot measured
Evidence by analyzer
Complexity (lizard)ok3 items
- draw in src/app/renderer.ts: complexity 18, 79 lines
- paint in src/app/digit-chart.ts: complexity 16, 55 lines
- readState in src/app/state.ts: complexity 16, 20 lines
- complex_functions
- 3
- function_nloc
- 2,493
- functions
- 354
- long_functions
- 0
- many_param_functions
- 0
- mean_ccn
- 2.43
- p90_ccn
- 5
- risky_nloc_share
- 6.2%
Duplication (jscpd)ok
- compared_lines
- 2,677
- duplicated_lines
- 0
- duplicated_share
- 0.0%
- files
- 43
Lintok
- category:correctness
- 2
- findings
- 2
- scanned_lines
- 3,601
- weighted_findings
- 0.50
Tests and CIok1 item
- CI config: .github/workflows/deploy.yml
.github/workflows/deploy.yml
- check:ci_present
- yes
- check:ci_runs_lint
- no
- check:ci_runs_tests
- no
- check:has_tests
- no
- check:test_ratio
- no
- check:tests_cochange
- no
- ci_files
- 1
- cochange_commits
- 67
- cochange_share
- 0.0%
- source_lines
- 3,601
- test_lines
- 0
- test_ratio
- 0
Documentationok1 item
- README.md
README.md
- check:changelog
- no
- check:contributing
- no
- check:license
- no
- check:readme
- yes
- readme_lines
- 100
Type safetyok1 item
- TypeScript strict type checking: tsconfig.json
tsconfig.json
- check:low_escape_density
- yes
- check:strict_config
- yes
- escapes
- 0
- escapes_per_kloc
- 0
Security
76 adequate
Security posture is adequate: 6 high-severity workflow issues. Weakest area: posture.
How the score is built
- Secrets97
- Static analysis (SAST)100
- Vulnerable dependencies100
- CI workflows30
- Security posture0
- OpenSSF Scorecardnot measured
Evidence by analyzer
OpenSSF Scorecardskipped
no published OpenSSF Scorecard result for this repo
Package registriesok
- checked
- 4
- declared
- 4
- lookup_errors
- 0
- missing
- 0
- recent
- 0
Secrets (gitleaks)ok
- secrets_current
- 0
- secrets_history
- 0
- secrets_low_confidence
- 1
- secrets_nonprod
- 0
Static analysis (opengrep)ok
- findings
- 0
- findings_high
- 0
- findings_low
- 0
- findings_medium
- 0
- parse_errors
- 0
- scanned_lines
- 3,601
- weighted_findings
- 0
Dependencies (osv-scanner)ok
- penalty
- 0
- vulnerabilities
- 0
- vulnerable_packages
- 0
- vulns_critical
- 0
- vulns_high
- 0
- vulns_low
- 0
- vulns_medium
- 0
- vulns_unknown
- 0
CI workflows (zizmor)ok
- findings
- 7
- findings_high
- 6
- findings_low
- 0
- findings_medium
- 1
- penalty
- 73.20
- workflows
- 1
Security postureok
- check:dependency_updates
- no
- check:lockfiles
- yes
- check:security_policy
- no
- check:signed_commits
- no
- signed_commit_share
- 0.0%
- unpinned_manifests
- 0
Release downloadsok
- binary_assets
- 0
- signals
- 0
- suspicious
- 0
Findings
6 high1 medium3 low
10 findings
| Severity | Rule | Location | Message | Tool |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| high | zizmor/unpinned-uses |
.github/workflows/deploy.yml:19 | unpinned action reference [confidence high] | CI workflows (zizmor) |
| high | zizmor/unpinned-uses |
.github/workflows/deploy.yml:20 | unpinned action reference [confidence high] | CI workflows (zizmor) |
| high | zizmor/unpinned-uses |
.github/workflows/deploy.yml:29 | unpinned action reference [confidence high] | CI workflows (zizmor) |
| high | zizmor/unpinned-uses |
.github/workflows/deploy.yml:41 | unpinned action reference [confidence high] | CI workflows (zizmor) |
| high | zizmor/excessive-permissions |
.github/workflows/deploy.yml:8 | overly broad permissions [confidence high] | CI workflows (zizmor) |
| high | zizmor/excessive-permissions |
.github/workflows/deploy.yml:9 | overly broad permissions [confidence high] | CI workflows (zizmor) |
| medium | zizmor/artipacked |
.github/workflows/deploy.yml:19 | credential persistence through GitHub Actions artifacts [confidence low] | CI workflows (zizmor) |
| low | opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.missing-template-string-indicator |
src/core/measure.ts:19 | This looks like a JavaScript template string. Are you missing a '$' in front of '{...}'? | Lint |
| low | opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.missing-template-string-indicator |
src/core/measure.ts:19 | This looks like a JavaScript template string. Are you missing a '$' in front of '{...}'? | Lint |
| low | gitleaks/generic-api-key |
index.html:121 | Possible generic-api-key secret in history (commit 4d6b31b885); removed from the current tree but still retrievable | Secrets (gitleaks) |
Tools and coverage
Every analyzer that ran on this commit. A failed or skipped tool is a coverage gap: its share of the score is left out and the coverage figure drops.
| Analyzer | Pillar | Status | Version | Findings | Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI tool configuration | AI provenance | ok | signatures-v1 | 0 | |
| Explicit AI attribution | AI provenance | ok | signatures-v1 | 0 | |
| Release velocity | AI provenance | skipped | — | 0 | |
| Coding style | AI provenance | ok | — | 0 | |
| Commit velocity | AI provenance | ok | prov-4 | 0 | |
| Complexity (lizard) | Code quality | ok | lizard 1.25.1 | 0 | |
| Documentation | Code quality | ok | — | 0 | |
| Duplication (jscpd) | Code quality | ok | repotrust-dup-w6 | 0 | |
| Lint | Code quality | ok | opengrep 1.33.1; rules f1d2b562b414 | 2 | |
| Tests and CI | Code quality | ok | — | 0 | |
| Type safety | Code quality | ok | — | 0 | |
| CI workflows (zizmor) | Security | ok | zizmor 1.32.0 | 7 | |
| Dependencies (osv-scanner) | Security | ok | osv-scanner version: 2.7.1 | 0 | |
| Release downloads | Security | ok | — | 0 | |
| Security posture | Security | ok | — | 0 | |
| Package registries | Security | ok | — | 0 | |
| Static analysis (opengrep) | Security | ok | opengrep 1.33.1; rules f1d2b562b414 | 0 | |
| OpenSSF Scorecard | Security | skipped | — | 0 | no published OpenSSF Scorecard result for this repo |
| Secrets (gitleaks) | Security | ok | gitleaks 8.30.1 | 1 |
Score history
Scores from different scoring versions aren't directly comparable.
| Scored | Commit | Scoring | AI provenance | Quality | Security |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-11-14 | d89be5876f2f | prov-5+qual-2+sec-2 | 0% | 65 | 76 |
| 2026-11-14 | d89be5876f2f | prov-4+qual-2+sec-2 | 0% | 65 | 76 |
Full text report
- Repository: https://github.com/szielina/pinheat
- Commit:
d89be5876f2f17f1242fcae641b8cb23ae9c79e3 - Generated: 2026-11-14T14:52:07+00:00
- Scorer 0.1.0, scoring prov-5+qual-2+sec-2, report schema v2
Scores
| Pillar | Score | Signal | Confidence | Coverage |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI provenance (estimated AI-generated share) | 0 | none-detected | 60% | 100% |
| Code quality | 65 | adequate | 90% | 100% |
| Security | 76 | adequate | 85% | 100% |
AI provenance
No AI attribution or AI-consistent velocity signals detected.
- Explicitly attributed share (lower bound): 0.0%
- Unattributed share in AI-consistent velocity bursts: 0.0%
- Estimated AI-generated share: 0.0%
| Month | Lines added | Attributed to AI |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-10 | 5,248 | 0% |
| 2026-11 | 4 | 0% |
AI provenance describes how code was produced; it is not a quality judgment. Unless attribution is explicit, these are signals consistent with AI generation, not proof. Squash/rebase workflows, imported code, and rewritten history reduce accuracy.
Code quality
Code quality is adequate: test-to-source ratio 0.00, no CI test run detected; 6% of function code in complex or long functions; 0% duplicated lines. Weakest area: testing.
| Area | Score |
|---|---|
| Complexity (lizard) | 83 |
| Duplication | 100 |
| Code smells (Opengrep) | 97 |
| Tests and CI | 15 |
| Documentation | 40 |
| Type safety | 100 |
| Process (Scorecard review/maintenance) | n/a |
- Functions: 354; mean complexity 2.4, 90th percentile 5; 3 complex and 0 long functions
- Duplicated lines: 0.0% of 2,677 compared
- Tests: 0 test lines for 3,601 source lines (ratio 0.00); CI test commands: none detected; 0% of recent source commits also change tests
- Docs missing or thin: license, contributing, changelog
Most complex functions:
- draw in src/app/renderer.ts: complexity 18, 79 lines
- paint in src/app/digit-chart.ts: complexity 16, 55 lines
- readState in src/app/state.ts: complexity 16, 20 lines
Security
Security posture is adequate: 6 high-severity workflow issues. Weakest area: posture.
| Area | Score |
|---|---|
| Secrets (gitleaks, tree + history) | 97 |
| Static analysis (Opengrep) | 100 |
| Vulnerable dependencies (OSV) | 100 |
| CI workflows (zizmor) | 30 |
| Posture (policy, updates, signing, lockfiles) | 0 |
| OpenSSF Scorecard | n/a |
- Posture checks passed: lockfiles; missing: security policy, dependency updates, signed commits
Top findings
| Severity | Finding | Location |
|---|---|---|
| high | zizmor/excessive-permissions: overly broad permissions [confidence high] |
.github/workflows/deploy.yml:8 |
| high | zizmor/excessive-permissions: overly broad permissions [confidence high] |
.github/workflows/deploy.yml:9 |
| high | zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] |
.github/workflows/deploy.yml:19 |
| high | zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] |
.github/workflows/deploy.yml:20 |
| high | zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] |
.github/workflows/deploy.yml:29 |
| high | zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] |
.github/workflows/deploy.yml:41 |
| medium | zizmor/artipacked: credential persistence through GitHub Actions artifacts [confidence low] |
.github/workflows/deploy.yml:19 |
| low | gitleaks/generic-api-key: Possible generic-api-key secret in history (commit 4d6b31b885); removed from the current tree but still retrievable |
index.html:121 |
Static signals only: the scorer never runs the project's code. Secret findings are pattern matches that were not verified, and secret values are never stored.
Repository profile
- Source lines: 3,601; test lines: 0
| Language | Lines |
|---|---|
| TypeScript | 3,550 |
| JavaScript | 51 |