sunfusheng/MarqueeView
俗名：可垂直跑、可水平跑的跑马灯；学名：可垂直翻、可水平翻的翻页公告
- Repository: https://github.com/sunfusheng/MarqueeView
- Commit:
8dbe328af7d1bf7364f33698f710747630461ee2 - Generated: 2026-11-13T23:27:41+00:00
- Scorer 0.1.0, scoring prov-4+qual-2+sec-2, report schema v2
Scores
| Pillar | Score | Signal | Confidence | Coverage |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI provenance (estimated AI-generated share) | 0 | none-detected | 60% | 100% |
| Code quality | 74 | adequate | 90% | 100% |
| Security | 74 | adequate | 85% | 100% |
AI provenance
No AI attribution or AI-consistent velocity signals detected.
- Explicitly attributed share (lower bound): 0.0%
- Unattributed share in AI-consistent velocity bursts: 0.0%
- Estimated AI-generated share: 0.0%
| Month | Lines added | Attributed to AI |
|---|---|---|
| 2016-12 | 25 | 0% |
| 2017-01 | 27 | 0% |
| 2017-06 | 1 | 0% |
| 2017-07 | 29 | 0% |
| 2017-08 | 534 | 0% |
| 2017-11 | 14 | 0% |
| 2017-12 | 12 | 0% |
| 2018-02 | 143 | 0% |
| 2018-09 | 19 | 0% |
| 2019-01 | 29 | 0% |
| 2019-04 | 176 | 0% |
| 2020-11 | 6 | 0% |
AI provenance describes how code was produced; it is not a quality judgment. Unless attribution is explicit, these are signals consistent with AI generation, not proof. Squash/rebase workflows, imported code, and rewritten history reduce accuracy.
Code quality
Code quality is adequate: test-to-source ratio 0.00, CI runs tests; 0% of function code in complex or long functions; 0% duplicated lines. Weakest area: testing.
| Area | Score |
|---|---|
| Complexity (lizard) | 100 |
| Duplication | 100 |
| Code smells (Opengrep) | 100 |
| Tests and CI | 35 |
| Documentation | 40 |
| Type safety | n/a |
| Process (Scorecard review/maintenance) | n/a |
- Functions: 82; mean complexity 1.7, 90th percentile 3; 0 complex and 0 long functions
- Duplicated lines: 0.0% of 584 compared
- Tests: 0 test lines for 1,020 source lines (ratio 0.00); CI test commands: nox; 0% of recent source commits also change tests
- Docs missing or thin: license, contributing, changelog
Security
Security posture is adequate: no high-impact findings. Weakest area: posture.
| Area | Score |
|---|---|
| Secrets (gitleaks, tree + history) | 97 |
| Static analysis (Opengrep) | 81 |
| Vulnerable dependencies (OSV) | n/a |
| CI workflows (zizmor) | n/a |
| Posture (policy, updates, signing, lockfiles) | 0 |
| OpenSSF Scorecard | n/a |
- Posture checks passed: lockfiles; missing: security policy, dependency updates, signed commits
Top findings
| Severity | Finding | Location |
|---|---|---|
| medium | opengrep/java.android.security.exported_activity: The application exports an activity. Any application on the device can launch the exported activity which may compromise the integrity of your application or its data. Ensure that any exported activities do not have privileged access to your application's control plane. [confidence medium] |
app/src/main/AndroidManifest.xml:24 |
| low | gitleaks/generic-api-key: Possible generic-api-key secret in history (commit b3a14e1db6); removed from the current tree but still retrievable |
Sample/src/main/java/com/sunfusheng/sample/MainActivity.java:19 |
Static signals only: the scorer never runs the project's code. Secret findings are pattern matches that were not verified, and secret values are never stored.
Repository profile
- Source lines: 1,020; test lines: 0
| Language | Lines |
|---|---|
| Java | 1,020 |