Leaderboard github.com
sofish/pen
enjoy live editing (+markdown)
AI provenance
0%
none-detected
- Confidence
- 65%
- Coverage
- 100%
Estimated share of AI-generated code. Explicit attribution is a lower bound.
Code quality
71/100
adequate
- Confidence
- 90%
- Coverage
- 100%
Complexity, duplication, lint density, tests, CI, docs and review process.
Security
50/100
poor
- Confidence
- 85%
- Coverage
- 100%
Secrets, static analysis, vulnerable dependencies, CI and supply-chain posture.
AI provenance
0% none-detected
No AI attribution or AI-consistent velocity signals detected.
How the score is built
- Explicitly attributed share0%
- Unattributed share in AI-pace bursts0%
- Estimated AI-generated share0%
- AI tool configuration files0
- Work sessions at AI pace0
- Releases at AI pace0
- Coding-style index (1.0+ means possible)0.00
Lines added per month all AI-attributed share
- 2013-08670 · 0% AI
- 2013-09508 · 0% AI
- 2013-1011 · 0% AI
- 2013-1173 · 0% AI
- 2013-1240 · 0% AI
- 2014-021 · 0% AI
- 2014-0416 · 0% AI
- 2014-0637 · 0% AI
- 2014-0747 · 0% AI
- 2014-08570 · 0% AI
- 2014-09326 · 0% AI
- 2014-1015 · 0% AI
- 2014-1185 · 0% AI
- 2015-01167 · 0% AI
- 2015-025 · 0% AI
- 2015-036 · 0% AI
- 2015-046 · 0% AI
- 2015-051 · 0% AI
- 2015-060 · 0% AI
- 2015-0731 · 0% AI
- 2015-0812 · 0% AI
- 2015-094 · 0% AI
- 2016-0122 · 0% AI
- 2016-031 · 0% AI
- 2016-0615 · 0% AI
- 2016-081 · 0% AI
- 2017-021 · 0% AI
- 2018-090 · 0% AI
Evidence by analyzer
Explicit AI attributionok
- attributed_commit_share
- 0.0%
- attributed_commits
- 0
- attributed_loc
- 0
- attributed_loc_share
- 0.0%
- commits
- 185
- effective_loc
- 2,671
- tools_detected
- 0
AI tool configurationok
- artifacts
- 0
- tools_configured
- 0
- workflow_agents
- 0
Commit velocityok
- excluded_import_loc
- 0
- flagged_loc
- 0
- flagged_loc_share
- 0.0%
- flagged_units
- 0
- max_loc_per_hour
- 64.77
- measured_loc
- 2,671
- median_loc_per_hour
- 51.67
- pr_timed_units
- 0
- pre_ai_era_burst_loc
- 0
- pre_ai_era_bursts
- 0
- pre_ai_era_measured_loc
- 2,671
- work_units
- 79
Release velocityok
- flagged_releases
- 0
- max_loc_per_day
- 24
- releases
- 7
Coding styleok
- count:assistant_voice
- 0
- count:emoji_in_code
- 0
- count:narrated_steps
- 0
- count:placeholder
- 0
- files:assistant_voice
- 0
- files:emoji_in_code
- 0
- files:narrated_steps
- 0
- files:placeholder
- 0
- index
- 0
- lines_scanned
- 971
- per_kloc:assistant_voice
- 0
- per_kloc:emoji_in_code
- 0
- per_kloc:narrated_steps
- 0
- per_kloc:placeholder
- 0
Code quality
71 adequate
Code quality is adequate: test-to-source ratio 0.00, no CI test run detected; 0% of function code in complex or long functions; 0% duplicated lines. Weakest area: testing.
How the score is built
- Complexity100
- Duplication100
- Lint and smells100
- Tests and CI15
- Documentation65
- Type safetynot measured
- Review processnot measured
Evidence by analyzer
Complexity (lizard)ok
- complex_functions
- 0
- function_nloc
- 850
- functions
- 97
- long_functions
- 0
- many_param_functions
- 0
- mean_ccn
- 3.02
- p90_ccn
- 8
- risky_nloc_share
- 0.0%
Duplication (jscpd)ok
- compared_lines
- 700
- duplicated_lines
- 0
- duplicated_share
- 0.0%
- files
- 3
Lintok
- findings
- 0
- scanned_lines
- 971
- weighted_findings
- 0
Tests and CIok1 item
- CI config: .travis.yml
.travis.yml
- check:ci_present
- yes
- check:ci_runs_lint
- no
- check:ci_runs_tests
- no
- check:has_tests
- no
- check:test_ratio
- no
- check:tests_cochange
- no
- ci_files
- 1
- cochange_commits
- 131
- cochange_share
- 0.0%
- source_lines
- 971
- test_lines
- 0
- test_ratio
- 0
Documentationok2 items
- readme.md
readme.md - license.txt
license.txt
- check:changelog
- no
- check:contributing
- no
- check:license
- yes
- check:readme
- yes
- readme_lines
- 124
Type safetyskipped
Security
50 poor
Security posture is poor: 8 high-severity SAST findings. Weakest area: posture.
How the score is built
- Secrets100
- Static analysis (SAST)12
- Vulnerable dependenciesnot measured
- CI workflowsnot measured
- Security posture0
- OpenSSF Scorecardnot measured
Evidence by analyzer
OpenSSF Scorecardskipped
no published OpenSSF Scorecard result for this repo
Package registriesok
- checked
- 4
- declared
- 4
- lookup_errors
- 0
- missing
- 0
- recent
- 0
Secrets (gitleaks)ok
- secrets_current
- 0
- secrets_history
- 0
- secrets_low_confidence
- 0
- secrets_nonprod
- 0
Static analysis (opengrep)ok
- findings
- 9
- findings_high
- 8
- findings_low
- 1
- findings_medium
- 0
- parse_errors
- 0
- scanned_lines
- 971
- weighted_findings
- 6.06
Dependencies (osv-scanner)skipped
CI workflows (zizmor)skipped
Security postureok1 item
- package.json has no lockfile alongside it (unpinned dependencies)
package.json
- check:dependency_updates
- no
- check:lockfiles
- no
- check:security_policy
- no
- check:signed_commits
- no
- signed_commit_share
- 0.0%
- unpinned_manifests
- 1
Release downloadsok
- binary_assets
- 0
- signals
- 0
- suspicious
- 0
Findings
8 high1 low
9 findings
| Severity | Rule | Location | Message | Tool |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| high | opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-document-method |
src/pen.js:175 | User controlled data in methods like `innerHTML`, `outerHTML` or `document.write` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| high | opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-innerhtml |
src/pen.js:175 | User controlled data in a `ctx._menu.innerHTML` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| high | opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-document-method |
src/pen.js:460 | User controlled data in methods like `innerHTML`, `outerHTML` or `document.write` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| high | opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-innerhtml |
src/pen.js:460 | User controlled data in a `div.innerHTML` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| high | opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-document-method |
src/pen.js:559 | User controlled data in methods like `innerHTML`, `outerHTML` or `document.write` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| high | opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-innerhtml |
src/pen.js:559 | User controlled data in a `this.config.editor.innerHTML` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| high | opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-document-method |
src/pen.js:817 | User controlled data in methods like `innerHTML`, `outerHTML` or `document.write` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| high | opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-innerhtml |
src/pen.js:817 | User controlled data in a `defaults.editor.innerHTML` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| low | opengrep/javascript.lang.security.audit.unsafe-formatstring |
src/pen.js:63 | Detected string concatenation with a non-literal variable in a util.format / console.log function. If an attacker injects a format specifier in the string, it will forge the log message. Try to use constant values for the format string.... | Static analysis (opengrep) |
Tools and coverage
Every analyzer that ran on this commit. A failed or skipped tool is a coverage gap: its share of the score is left out and the coverage figure drops.
| Analyzer | Pillar | Status | Version | Findings | Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI tool configuration | AI provenance | ok | signatures-v1 | 0 | |
| Explicit AI attribution | AI provenance | ok | signatures-v1 | 0 | |
| Release velocity | AI provenance | ok | prov-4 | 0 | |
| Coding style | AI provenance | ok | — | 0 | |
| Commit velocity | AI provenance | ok | prov-4 | 0 | |
| Complexity (lizard) | Code quality | ok | lizard 1.25.1 | 0 | |
| Documentation | Code quality | ok | — | 0 | |
| Duplication (jscpd) | Code quality | ok | repotrust-dup-w6 | 0 | |
| Lint | Code quality | ok | opengrep 1.33.1; rules f1d2b562b414 | 0 | |
| Tests and CI | Code quality | ok | — | 0 | |
| Type safety | Code quality | skipped | — | 0 | |
| CI workflows (zizmor) | Security | skipped | — | 0 | |
| Dependencies (osv-scanner) | Security | skipped | — | 0 | |
| Release downloads | Security | ok | — | 0 | |
| Security posture | Security | ok | — | 0 | |
| Package registries | Security | ok | — | 0 | |
| Static analysis (opengrep) | Security | ok | opengrep 1.33.1; rules f1d2b562b414 | 9 | |
| OpenSSF Scorecard | Security | skipped | — | 0 | no published OpenSSF Scorecard result for this repo |
| Secrets (gitleaks) | Security | ok | gitleaks 8.30.1 | 0 |
Score history
Scores from different scoring versions aren't directly comparable.
| Scored | Commit | Scoring | AI provenance | Quality | Security |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-11-14 | 6c65fb361266 | prov-5+qual-2+sec-2 | 0% | 71 | 50 |
| 2026-11-14 | 6c65fb361266 | prov-4+qual-2+sec-2 | 0% | 71 | 50 |
Full text report
- Repository: https://github.com/sofish/pen
- Commit:
6c65fb361266dfdfd98880ebc01ee9027400951b - Generated: 2026-11-14T14:52:07+00:00
- Scorer 0.1.0, scoring prov-5+qual-2+sec-2, report schema v2
Scores
| Pillar | Score | Signal | Confidence | Coverage |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI provenance (estimated AI-generated share) | 0 | none-detected | 65% | 100% |
| Code quality | 71 | adequate | 90% | 100% |
| Security | 50 | poor | 85% | 100% |
AI provenance
No AI attribution or AI-consistent velocity signals detected.
- Explicitly attributed share (lower bound): 0.0%
- Unattributed share in AI-consistent velocity bursts: 0.0%
- Estimated AI-generated share: 0.0%
| Month | Lines added | Attributed to AI |
|---|---|---|
| 2015-02 | 5 | 0% |
| 2015-03 | 6 | 0% |
| 2015-04 | 6 | 0% |
| 2015-05 | 1 | 0% |
| 2015-07 | 31 | 0% |
| 2015-08 | 12 | 0% |
| 2015-09 | 4 | 0% |
| 2016-01 | 22 | 0% |
| 2016-03 | 1 | 0% |
| 2016-06 | 15 | 0% |
| 2016-08 | 1 | 0% |
| 2017-02 | 1 | 0% |
AI provenance describes how code was produced; it is not a quality judgment. Unless attribution is explicit, these are signals consistent with AI generation, not proof. Squash/rebase workflows, imported code, and rewritten history reduce accuracy.
Code quality
Code quality is adequate: test-to-source ratio 0.00, no CI test run detected; 0% of function code in complex or long functions; 0% duplicated lines. Weakest area: testing.
| Area | Score |
|---|---|
| Complexity (lizard) | 100 |
| Duplication | 100 |
| Code smells (Opengrep) | 100 |
| Tests and CI | 15 |
| Documentation | 65 |
| Type safety | n/a |
| Process (Scorecard review/maintenance) | n/a |
- Functions: 97; mean complexity 3.0, 90th percentile 8; 0 complex and 0 long functions
- Duplicated lines: 0.0% of 700 compared
- Tests: 0 test lines for 971 source lines (ratio 0.00); CI test commands: none detected; 0% of recent source commits also change tests
- Docs missing or thin: contributing, changelog
Security
Security posture is poor: 8 high-severity SAST findings. Weakest area: posture.
| Area | Score |
|---|---|
| Secrets (gitleaks, tree + history) | 100 |
| Static analysis (Opengrep) | 12 |
| Vulnerable dependencies (OSV) | n/a |
| CI workflows (zizmor) | n/a |
| Posture (policy, updates, signing, lockfiles) | 0 |
| OpenSSF Scorecard | n/a |
- Posture checks passed: none; missing: security policy, dependency updates, signed commits, lockfiles
Top findings
| Severity | Finding | Location |
|---|---|---|
| high | opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-document-method: User controlled data in methods like innerHTML, outerHTML or document.write is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] |
src/pen.js:175 |
| high | opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-innerhtml: User controlled data in a ctx._menu.innerHTML is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] |
src/pen.js:175 |
| high | opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-document-method: User controlled data in methods like innerHTML, outerHTML or document.write is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] |
src/pen.js:460 |
| high | opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-innerhtml: User controlled data in a div.innerHTML is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] |
src/pen.js:460 |
| high | opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-document-method: User controlled data in methods like innerHTML, outerHTML or document.write is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] |
src/pen.js:559 |
| high | opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-innerhtml: User controlled data in a this.config.editor.innerHTML is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] |
src/pen.js:559 |
| high | opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-document-method: User controlled data in methods like innerHTML, outerHTML or document.write is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] |
src/pen.js:817 |
| high | opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-innerhtml: User controlled data in a defaults.editor.innerHTML is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] |
src/pen.js:817 |
| low | opengrep/javascript.lang.security.audit.unsafe-formatstring: Detected string concatenation with a non-literal variable in a util.format / console.log function. If an attacker injects a format specifier in the string, it will forge the log message. Try to use constant values for the format string. [confidence low] |
src/pen.js:63 |
Static signals only: the scorer never runs the project's code. Secret findings are pattern matches that were not verified, and secret values are never stored.
Repository profile
- Source lines: 971; test lines: 0
| Language | Lines |
|---|---|
| JavaScript | 971 |