Leaderboard github.com

snufflyyy/trials-hd-recompiled

Trials HD for the Xbox 360 recompiled

View repository ↗
C++
★ 26
commit 17a76f5e674c
scored 2026-11-14
scoring prov-5+qual-2+sec-2

unreviewed-ai-risk

AI provenance

63%

explicit

Confidence: 95%
Coverage: 100%

Estimated share of AI-generated code. Explicit attribution is a lower bound.

Code quality

49/100

poor

Confidence: 90%
Coverage: 100%

Complexity, duplication, lint density, tests, CI, docs and review process.

Security

76/100

adequate

Confidence: 85%
Coverage: 100%

Secrets, static analysis, vulnerable dependencies, CI and supply-chain posture.

Dispute or request a re-score Full report JSON

AI provenance

63% explicit

Explicit AI attribution on 63% of first-party code added; an estimated 63% including velocity signals.

How the score is built

Explicitly attributed share63%
Unattributed share in AI-pace bursts31%
Estimated AI-generated share63%
AI tool configuration files2
Work sessions at AI pace8
Releases at AI pacenot measured
Coding-style index (1.0+ means possible)0.10

Attributed AI tools

Tool	Commits	Lines added	First seen	Last seen
Claude Code	110	36,941	2026-10-13	2026-10-19

Lines added per month all AI-attributed share

2026-1058,310 · 63% AI

Findings in AI-attributed lines vs the rest

From git blame: 15,458 lines trace to AI-attributed commits, 5,081 to others. Reported, not scored.

Findings per 1,000 lines	AI-attributed	Other	Ratio
Code quality	0.00	0.59	0.00×
Security	0.19	0.00	—

Evidence by analyzer

Explicit AI attributionok26 items

attributed_commit_share: 56.1%
attributed_commits: 110
attributed_loc: 36,941
attributed_loc_share: 63.4%
commits: 196
effective_loc: 58,310
tools_detected: 1

AI tool configurationok2 items

artifacts: 2
earliest_adoption: 2026-10-19
tools_configured: 2
workflow_agents: 0

Commit velocityok8 items

excluded_import_loc: 12,003
flagged_loc: 35,546
flagged_loc_share: 76.8%
flagged_units: 8
max_loc_per_hour: 4,116.21
measured_loc: 46,307
median_loc_per_hour: 205.77
pr_timed_units: 0
pre_ai_era_burst_loc: 0
pre_ai_era_bursts: 0
pre_ai_era_measured_loc: 0
work_units: 40

Release velocityskipped

Coding styleok1 item

assistant-style phrasing left in code: // kGuestOutputFormat, sized as requested by the refresher.

count:assistant_voice: 1
count:emoji_in_code: 0
count:narrated_steps: 0
count:placeholder: 0
files:assistant_voice: 1
files:emoji_in_code: 0
files:narrated_steps: 0
files:placeholder: 0
index: 0.10
lines_scanned: 20,539
per_kloc:assistant_voice: 0.05
per_kloc:emoji_in_code: 0
per_kloc:narrated_steps: 0
per_kloc:placeholder: 0

Findings in AI-written linesok

ai_lines: 15,458
blame_failures: 0
files_blamed: 102
other_lines: 5,081
quality:ai_findings: 0
quality:ai_per_kloc: 0
quality:other_findings: 3
quality:other_per_kloc: 0.59
quality:ratio: 0
security:ai_findings: 3
security:ai_per_kloc: 0.19
security:other_findings: 0
security:other_per_kloc: 0

Code quality

49 poor

Code quality is poor: test-to-source ratio 0.00, no CI test run detected; 45% of function code in complex or long functions; 2% duplicated lines. Weakest area: testing.

How the score is built

Complexity26
Duplication88
Lint and smells96
Tests and CI10
Documentation65
Type safety40
Review processnot measured

Evidence by analyzer

Complexity (lizard)ok10 items

complex_functions: 54
function_nloc: 13,167
functions: 700
long_functions: 20
many_param_functions: 2
mean_ccn: 5.08
p90_ccn: 13
risky_nloc_share: 45.0%

Duplication (jscpd)ok10 items

compared_lines: 15,501
duplicated_lines: 327
duplicated_share: 2.1%
files: 102

Lintok

category:best-practice: 3
findings: 3
scanned_lines: 20,539
weighted_findings: 3

Tests and CIok

check:ci_present: no
check:ci_runs_lint: no
check:ci_runs_tests: no
check:has_tests: no
check:test_ratio: no
check:tests_cochange: yes
ci_files: 0
cochange_commits: 122
cochange_share: 29.5%
source_lines: 20,539
test_lines: 0
test_ratio: 0

Documentationok2 items

README.md README.md
LICENSE LICENSE

check:changelog: no
check:contributing: no
check:license: yes
check:readme: yes
readme_lines: 172

Type safetyok

check:low_escape_density: yes
check:strict_config: no
escapes: 0
escapes_per_kloc: 0

Security

76 adequate

Security posture is adequate: no high-impact findings. Weakest area: posture.

How the score is built

Secrets88
Static analysis (SAST)99
Vulnerable dependenciesnot measured
CI workflowsnot measured
Security posture0
OpenSSF Scorecardnot measured

Evidence by analyzer

OpenSSF Scorecardskipped

no published OpenSSF Scorecard result for this repo

Package registriesskipped

no registry dependencies declared

Secrets (gitleaks)ok

secrets_current: 0
secrets_history: 0
secrets_low_confidence: 3
secrets_nonprod: 1

Static analysis (opengrep)ok

findings: 2
findings_high: 0
findings_low: 0
findings_medium: 2
parse_errors: 0
scanned_lines: 20,539
weighted_findings: 0.50

Dependencies (osv-scanner)skipped

CI workflows (zizmor)skipped

Security postureok

check:dependency_updates: no
check:lockfiles: yes
check:security_policy: no
check:signed_commits: no
signed_commit_share: 0.0%
unpinned_manifests: 0

Release downloadsok

binary_assets: 0
signals: 0
suspicious: 0

Findings

5 medium4 low

Severity	Rule	Location	Message	Tool
medium	`opengrep/python.lang.best-practice.unspecified-open-encoding`	tools/gen_trace_shims.py:26	Missing 'encoding' parameter. 'open()' uses device locale encodings by default, corrupting files with special characters. Specify the encoding to ensure cross-platform support when opening files in text mode (e.g. encoding="utf-8").	Lint
medium	`opengrep/python.lang.best-practice.unspecified-open-encoding`	tools/gen_trace_shims.py:34	Missing 'encoding' parameter. 'open()' uses device locale encodings by default, corrupting files with special characters. Specify the encoding to ensure cross-platform support when opening files in text mode (e.g. encoding="utf-8").	Lint
medium	`opengrep/python.lang.best-practice.unspecified-open-encoding`	tools/gen_trace_shims.py:39	Missing 'encoding' parameter. 'open()' uses device locale encodings by default, corrupting files with special characters. Specify the encoding to ensure cross-platform support when opening files in text mode (e.g. encoding="utf-8").	Lint
medium	`opengrep/bash.lang.security.ifs-tampering`	run.sh:185	The special variable IFS affects how splitting takes place when expanding unquoted variables. Don't set it globally. Prefer a dedicated utility such as 'cut' or 'awk' if you need to split input data. If you must use 'read', set IFS...	Static analysis (opengrep)
medium	`opengrep/javascript.express.security.audit.xss.mustache.template-explicit-unescape`	web/shell.html:137	Detected an explicit unescape in a Mustache template, using triple braces '{{{...}}}' or ampersand '&'. If external data can reach these locations, your application is exposed to a cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability. If you must...	Static analysis (opengrep)
low	`gitleaks/generic-api-key`	docs/webgpu-renderer/README.md:1957	Possible generic-api-key secret in history (commit 4d52f95ac6); removed from the current tree but still retrievable	Secrets (gitleaks)
low	`gitleaks/generic-api-key`	src/gpu_webgpu/texture_cache.cpp:424	Possible generic-api-key secret in the current tree	Secrets (gitleaks)
low	`gitleaks/generic-api-key`	src/graphics_settings.cpp:145	Possible generic-api-key secret in the current tree	Secrets (gitleaks)
low	`gitleaks/generic-api-key`	tools/profile/vk_gpu_prof.patch:310	Possible generic-api-key secret in history (commit 75125a6bd5); removed from the current tree but still retrievable	Secrets (gitleaks)

Tools and coverage

Every analyzer that ran on this commit. A failed or skipped tool is a coverage gap: its share of the score is left out and the coverage figure drops.

Analyzer	Pillar	Status	Version	Findings	Note
AI tool configuration	AI provenance	ok	`signatures-v1`	0
Explicit AI attribution	AI provenance	ok	`signatures-v1`	0
Release velocity	AI provenance	skipped	`—`	0
Coding style	AI provenance	ok	`—`	0
Commit velocity	AI provenance	ok	`prov-4`	0
Findings in AI-written lines	AI provenance	ok	`git-blame`	0
Complexity (lizard)	Code quality	ok	`lizard 1.25.1`	0
Documentation	Code quality	ok	`—`	0
Duplication (jscpd)	Code quality	ok	`repotrust-dup-w6`	0
Lint	Code quality	ok	`opengrep 1.33.1; rules f1d2b562b414`	3
Tests and CI	Code quality	ok	`—`	0
Type safety	Code quality	ok	`—`	0
CI workflows (zizmor)	Security	skipped	`—`	0
Dependencies (osv-scanner)	Security	skipped	`—`	0
Release downloads	Security	ok	`—`	0
Security posture	Security	ok	`—`	0
Package registries	Security	skipped	`—`	0	no registry dependencies declared
Static analysis (opengrep)	Security	ok	`opengrep 1.33.1; rules f1d2b562b414`	2
OpenSSF Scorecard	Security	skipped	`—`	0	no published OpenSSF Scorecard result for this repo
Secrets (gitleaks)	Security	ok	`gitleaks 8.30.1`	4

Score history

Scores from different scoring versions aren't directly comparable.

Scored	Commit	Scoring	AI provenance	Quality	Security
2026-11-14	`17a76f5e674c`	`prov-5+qual-2+sec-2`	63%	49	76
2026-11-14	`17a76f5e674c`	`prov-4+qual-2+sec-2`	63%	49	76

Embed a badge

Maintainers can show these in a README. Badges update when the repository is re-scored.

[![RepoTrust ai](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/badge/github.com/snufflyyy/trials-hd-recompiled/ai.svg)](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/r/github.com/snufflyyy/trials-hd-recompiled/)

[![RepoTrust quality](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/badge/github.com/snufflyyy/trials-hd-recompiled/quality.svg)](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/r/github.com/snufflyyy/trials-hd-recompiled/)

[![RepoTrust security](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/badge/github.com/snufflyyy/trials-hd-recompiled/security.svg)](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/r/github.com/snufflyyy/trials-hd-recompiled/)

Full text report

Repository: https://github.com/snufflyyy/trials-hd-recompiled
Commit: 17a76f5e674c6132d74f587567e0ecc1624ce3e6
Generated: 2026-11-14T14:52:07+00:00
Scorer 0.1.0, scoring prov-5+qual-2+sec-2, report schema v2

Scores

Unreviewed AI code risk: a large share of this code is explicitly AI-attributed, and its tests or review process are weak while quality or security scores are low.

Pillar	Score	Signal	Confidence	Coverage
AI provenance (estimated AI-generated share)	63	explicit	95%	100%
Code quality	49	poor	90%	100%
Security	76	adequate	85%	100%

AI provenance

Explicit AI attribution on 63% of first-party code added; an estimated 63% including velocity signals.

Explicitly attributed share (lower bound): 63.3%
Unattributed share in AI-consistent velocity bursts: 30.7%
Estimated AI-generated share: 63.3%

AI tool	Attributed commits	Lines added
Claude Code	110	36,941

AI tooling configured in repo: claude-code, generic-agent

Current source lines last changed by AI-attributed commits: 15,458 of 20,539.

Findings per 1,000 lines	AI-attributed	Other	Ratio
Quality	0.0	0.59	0.0x
Security	0.194	0.0	n/a

Stylometry index: 0.10 per 1,000 lines (narrated steps 0, placeholders 0, assistant phrasing 1, emoji 0). Reported as a signal, not scored.

Month	Lines added	Attributed to AI
2026-10	58,310	63%

Evidence

Claude Code: on merged branch (17a76f5e67) (394e3f3f24d0)
Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (9ee1af97a972)
Claude Code: on merged branch (4ccf0294ae) (e3c72ce7336e)
Claude Code: on merged branch (38f736d690) (77351fc62d21)
Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (e426d53cf041)
Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (17969622c2ea)
Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (67aa1c28edf2)
Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (644ffc2d14a2)
Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (8c16eef9a86e)
Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (01bd44fa1cdb)
Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (69486b46b887)
Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (a06980e3f506)
Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (be4dcde494cd)
Claude Code: on merged branch (de0b8cb0f4) (bedca4ad3603)
Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (82fd19176142)

AI provenance describes how code was produced; it is not a quality judgment. Unless attribution is explicit, these are signals consistent with AI generation, not proof. Squash/rebase workflows, imported code, and rewritten history reduce accuracy.

Code quality

Code quality is poor: test-to-source ratio 0.00, no CI test run detected; 45% of function code in complex or long functions; 2% duplicated lines. Weakest area: testing.

Area	Score
Complexity (lizard)	26
Duplication	88
Code smells (Opengrep)	96
Tests and CI	10
Documentation	65
Type safety	40
Process (Scorecard review/maintenance)	n/a

Functions: 700; mean complexity 5.1, 90th percentile 13; 54 complex and 20 long functions
Duplicated lines: 2.1% of 15,501 compared
Tests: 0 test lines for 20,539 source lines (ratio 0.00); CI test commands: none detected; 30% of recent source commits also change tests
Docs missing or thin: contributing, changelog

Most complex functions:

Security

Security posture is adequate: no high-impact findings. Weakest area: posture.

Area	Score
Secrets (gitleaks, tree + history)	88
Static analysis (Opengrep)	99
Vulnerable dependencies (OSV)	n/a
CI workflows (zizmor)	n/a
Posture (policy, updates, signing, lockfiles)	0
OpenSSF Scorecard	n/a

Posture checks passed: lockfiles; missing: security policy, dependency updates, signed commits

Top findings

Severity	Finding	Location
medium	`opengrep/bash.lang.security.ifs-tampering`: The special variable IFS affects how splitting takes place when expanding unquoted variables. Don't set it globally. Prefer a dedicated utility such as 'cut' or 'awk' if you need to split input data. If you must use 'read', set IFS locally using e.g. 'IFS="," read -a my_array'. [confidence low]	run.sh:185
medium	`opengrep/javascript.express.security.audit.xss.mustache.template-explicit-unescape`: Detected an explicit unescape in a Mustache template, using triple braces '{{{...}}}' or ampersand '&'. If external data can reach these locations, your application is exposed to a cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability. If you must do this, ensure no external data can reach this location. [confidence low]	web/shell.html:137
low	`gitleaks/generic-api-key`: Possible generic-api-key secret in the current tree	src/gpu_webgpu/texture_cache.cpp:424
low	`gitleaks/generic-api-key`: Possible generic-api-key secret in the current tree	src/graphics_settings.cpp:145
low	`gitleaks/generic-api-key`: Possible generic-api-key secret in history (commit 75125a6bd5); removed from the current tree but still retrievable	tools/profile/vk_gpu_prof.patch:310
low	`gitleaks/generic-api-key`: Possible generic-api-key secret in history (commit 4d52f95ac6); removed from the current tree but still retrievable	docs/webgpu-renderer/README.md:1957

Static signals only: the scorer never runs the project's code. Secret findings are pattern matches that were not verified, and secret values are never stored.

Repository profile

Source lines: 20,539; test lines: 0

Language	Lines
C++	14,245
C	4,402
Shell	850
JavaScript	820
Python	222