Leaderboard github.com
slavhate/legacy-vault
Self-hosted, encrypted personal data vault for estate planning — store finances, legal docs, insurance, and final wishes with dead man's switch and beneficiary access
unreviewed-ai-risk
AI provenance
100%
explicit
- Confidence
- 73%
- Coverage
- 100%
Estimated share of AI-generated code. Explicit attribution is a lower bound.
Code quality
51/100
weak
- Confidence
- 90%
- Coverage
- 100%
Complexity, duplication, lint density, tests, CI, docs and review process.
Security
53/100
weak
- Confidence
- 85%
- Coverage
- 100%
Secrets, static analysis, vulnerable dependencies, CI and supply-chain posture.
AI provenance
100% explicit
Explicit AI attribution on 100% of first-party code added; an estimated 100% including velocity signals.
How the score is built
- Explicitly attributed share100%
- Unattributed share in AI-pace bursts0%
- Estimated AI-generated share100%
- AI tool configuration files0
- Work sessions at AI pace0
- Releases at AI pacenot measured
- Coding-style index (1.0+ means possible)0.00
Attributed AI tools
| Tool | Commits | Lines added | First seen | Last seen |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Code | 12 | 2,174 | 2026-04-09 | 2026-04-24 |
Lines added per month all AI-attributed share
- 2026-042,174 · 100% AI
Findings in AI-attributed lines vs the rest
From git blame: 2,159 lines trace to AI-attributed commits, 0 to others. Too few lines in one group for a fair comparison. Reported, not scored.
| Findings per 1,000 lines | AI-attributed | Other | Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|
| Code quality | 23.62 | — | — |
| Security | 33.81 | — | — |
Evidence by analyzer
Explicit AI attributionok13 items
- Claude Code: 12 attributed commits, 2,174 lines added
- Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude'
- Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude'
- Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude'
- Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude'
- Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude'
- Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude'
- Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude'
- Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude'
- Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude'
- Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude'
- Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude'
- Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude'
- attributed_commit_share
- 100.0%
- attributed_commits
- 12
- attributed_loc
- 2,174
- attributed_loc_share
- 100.0%
- commits
- 12
- effective_loc
- 2,174
- tools_detected
- 1
AI tool configurationok
- artifacts
- 0
- tools_configured
- 0
- workflow_agents
- 0
Commit velocityok
- excluded_import_loc
- 2,153
- flagged_loc
- 0
- flagged_loc_share
- 0.0%
- flagged_units
- 0
- max_loc_per_hour
- 2.79
- measured_loc
- 21
- median_loc_per_hour
- 0
- pr_timed_units
- 0
- pre_ai_era_burst_loc
- 0
- pre_ai_era_bursts
- 0
- pre_ai_era_measured_loc
- 0
- work_units
- 4
Release velocityskipped
Coding styleok
- count:assistant_voice
- 0
- count:emoji_in_code
- 0
- count:narrated_steps
- 0
- count:placeholder
- 0
- files:assistant_voice
- 0
- files:emoji_in_code
- 0
- files:narrated_steps
- 0
- files:placeholder
- 0
- index
- 0
- lines_scanned
- 2,159
- per_kloc:assistant_voice
- 0
- per_kloc:emoji_in_code
- 0
- per_kloc:narrated_steps
- 0
- per_kloc:placeholder
- 0
Findings in AI-written linesok
- ai_lines
- 2,159
- blame_failures
- 0
- files_blamed
- 16
- other_lines
- 0
- quality:ai_findings
- 51
- quality:ai_per_kloc
- 23.62
- quality:other_findings
- 0
- security:ai_findings
- 73
- security:ai_per_kloc
- 33.81
- security:other_findings
- 0
Code quality
51 weak
Code quality is weak: test-to-source ratio 0.00, no CI test run detected; 2% of function code in complex or long functions; 0% duplicated lines. Weakest area: testing.
How the score is built
- Complexity95
- Duplication100
- Lint and smells16
- Tests and CI0
- Documentation65
- Type safetynot measured
- Review processnot measured
Evidence by analyzer
Complexity (lizard)ok1 item
- complex_functions
- 1
- function_nloc
- 1,482
- functions
- 181
- long_functions
- 0
- many_param_functions
- 0
- mean_ccn
- 2.81
- p90_ccn
- 6
- risky_nloc_share
- 1.6%
Duplication (jscpd)ok
- compared_lines
- 1,699
- duplicated_lines
- 0
- duplicated_share
- 0.0%
- files
- 16
Lintok
- category:best-practice
- 4
- category:correctness
- 47
- findings
- 51
- scanned_lines
- 2,159
- weighted_findings
- 15.75
Tests and CIok
- check:ci_present
- no
- check:ci_runs_lint
- no
- check:ci_runs_tests
- no
- check:has_tests
- no
- check:test_ratio
- no
- check:tests_cochange
- no
- ci_files
- 0
- cochange_commits
- 6
- cochange_share
- 0.0%
- source_lines
- 2,159
- test_lines
- 0
- test_ratio
- 0
Documentationok2 items
- README.md
README.md - LICENSE
LICENSE
- check:changelog
- no
- check:contributing
- no
- check:license
- yes
- check:readme
- yes
- readme_lines
- 216
Type safetyskipped
Security
53 weak
Security posture is weak: 31 high-severity SAST findings. Weakest area: sast.
How the score is built
- Secrets100
- Static analysis (SAST)0
- Vulnerable dependenciesnot measured
- CI workflowsnot measured
- Security posture40
- OpenSSF Scorecardnot measured
Evidence by analyzer
OpenSSF Scorecardskipped
no published OpenSSF Scorecard result for this repo
Package registriesok
- checked
- 7
- declared
- 7
- lookup_errors
- 0
- missing
- 0
- recent
- 0
Secrets (gitleaks)ok
- secrets_current
- 0
- secrets_history
- 0
- secrets_low_confidence
- 0
- secrets_nonprod
- 0
Static analysis (opengrep)ok
- findings
- 75
- findings_high
- 31
- findings_low
- 1
- findings_medium
- 43
- parse_errors
- 0
- scanned_lines
- 2,159
- weighted_findings
- 37.21
Dependencies (osv-scanner)skipped
CI workflows (zizmor)skipped
Security postureok2 items
- Security policy: SECURITY.md
SECURITY.md - package.json has no lockfile alongside it (unpinned dependencies)
package.json
- check:dependency_updates
- no
- check:lockfiles
- no
- check:security_policy
- yes
- check:signed_commits
- no
- signed_commit_share
- 0.0%
- unpinned_manifests
- 1
Release downloadsok
- binary_assets
- 0
- signals
- 0
- suspicious
- 0
Findings
31 high47 medium48 low
126 findings
| Severity | Rule | Location | Message | Tool |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| high | opengrep/dockerfile.security.missing-user |
Dockerfile:37 | By not specifying a USER, a program in the container may run as 'root'. This is a security hazard. If an attacker can control a process running as root, they may have control over the container. Ensure that the last USER in a Dockerfile... | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| high | opengrep/dockerfile.security.missing-user |
Dockerfile:40 | By not specifying a USER, a program in the container may run as 'root'. This is a security hazard. If an attacker can control a process running as root, they may have control over the container. Ensure that the last USER in a Dockerfile... | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| high | opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-document-method |
public/js/app.js:254 | User controlled data in methods like `innerHTML`, `outerHTML` or `document.write` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| high | opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-innerhtml |
public/js/app.js:254 | User controlled data in a `app.innerHTML` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| high | opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-document-method |
public/js/app.js:341 | User controlled data in methods like `innerHTML`, `outerHTML` or `document.write` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| high | opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-innerhtml |
public/js/app.js:341 | User controlled data in a `app.innerHTML` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| high | opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-document-method |
public/js/app.js:390 | User controlled data in methods like `innerHTML`, `outerHTML` or `document.write` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| high | opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-innerhtml |
public/js/app.js:390 | User controlled data in a `app.innerHTML` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| high | opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-document-method |
public/js/app.js:435 | User controlled data in methods like `innerHTML`, `outerHTML` or `document.write` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| high | opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-innerhtml |
public/js/app.js:435 | User controlled data in a `app.innerHTML` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| high | opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-document-method |
public/js/app.js:512 | User controlled data in methods like `innerHTML`, `outerHTML` or `document.write` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| high | opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-innerhtml |
public/js/app.js:512 | User controlled data in a `app.innerHTML` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| high | opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-document-method |
public/js/app.js:605 | User controlled data in methods like `innerHTML`, `outerHTML` or `document.write` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| high | opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-innerhtml |
public/js/app.js:605 | User controlled data in a `app.innerHTML` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| high | opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-document-method |
public/js/app.js:656 | User controlled data in methods like `innerHTML`, `outerHTML` or `document.write` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| high | opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-innerhtml |
public/js/app.js:656 | User controlled data in a `app.innerHTML` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| high | opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-document-method |
public/js/app.js:729 | User controlled data in methods like `innerHTML`, `outerHTML` or `document.write` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| high | opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-innerhtml |
public/js/app.js:729 | User controlled data in a `$('#restore-result').innerHTML` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| high | opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-document-method |
public/js/app.js:748 | User controlled data in methods like `innerHTML`, `outerHTML` or `document.write` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| high | opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-innerhtml |
public/js/app.js:748 | User controlled data in a `app.innerHTML` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| high | opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-document-method |
public/js/app.js:790 | User controlled data in methods like `innerHTML`, `outerHTML` or `document.write` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| high | opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-innerhtml |
public/js/app.js:790 | User controlled data in a `result.innerHTML` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| high | opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-document-method |
public/js/app.js:791 | User controlled data in methods like `innerHTML`, `outerHTML` or `document.write` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| high | opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-innerhtml |
public/js/app.js:791 | User controlled data in a `result.innerHTML` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| high | opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-document-method |
public/js/app.js:797 | User controlled data in methods like `innerHTML`, `outerHTML` or `document.write` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| high | opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-innerhtml |
public/js/app.js:797 | User controlled data in a `result.innerHTML` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| high | opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-document-method |
public/js/app.js:799 | User controlled data in methods like `innerHTML`, `outerHTML` or `document.write` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| high | opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-innerhtml |
public/js/app.js:799 | User controlled data in a `result.innerHTML` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| high | opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-document-method |
public/js/app.js:827 | User controlled data in methods like `innerHTML`, `outerHTML` or `document.write` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| high | opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-innerhtml |
public/js/app.js:827 | User controlled data in a `app.innerHTML` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| high | opengrep/javascript.node-crypto.security.gcm-no-tag-length |
server/crypto.js:27 | The call to 'createDecipheriv' with the Galois Counter Mode (GCM) mode of operation is missing an expected authentication tag length. If the expected authentication tag length is not specified or otherwise checked, the application might... | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| medium | opengrep/javascript.lang.best-practice.javascript-confirm |
public/js/app.js:403 | found confirm() call; should this be in production code? | Lint |
| medium | opengrep/javascript.lang.best-practice.javascript-confirm |
public/js/app.js:539 | found confirm() call; should this be in production code? | Lint |
| medium | opengrep/javascript.lang.best-practice.javascript-confirm |
public/js/app.js:545 | found confirm() call; should this be in production code? | Lint |
| medium | opengrep/javascript.lang.best-practice.javascript-confirm |
public/js/app.js:723 | found confirm() call; should this be in production code? | Lint |
| medium | opengrep/javascript.lang.security.html-in-template-string |
public/js/app.js:148 | This template literal looks like HTML and has interpolated variables. These variables are not HTML-encoded by default. If the variables contain HTML tags, these may be interpreted by the browser, resulting in cross-site scripting (XSS).... | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| medium | opengrep/javascript.lang.security.html-in-template-string |
public/js/app.js:149 | This template literal looks like HTML and has interpolated variables. These variables are not HTML-encoded by default. If the variables contain HTML tags, these may be interpreted by the browser, resulting in cross-site scripting (XSS).... | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| medium | opengrep/javascript.lang.security.html-in-template-string |
public/js/app.js:191 | This template literal looks like HTML and has interpolated variables. These variables are not HTML-encoded by default. If the variables contain HTML tags, these may be interpreted by the browser, resulting in cross-site scripting (XSS).... | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| medium | opengrep/javascript.lang.security.html-in-template-string |
public/js/app.js:247 | This template literal looks like HTML and has interpolated variables. These variables are not HTML-encoded by default. If the variables contain HTML tags, these may be interpreted by the browser, resulting in cross-site scripting (XSS).... | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| medium | opengrep/javascript.lang.security.html-in-template-string |
public/js/app.js:254 | This template literal looks like HTML and has interpolated variables. These variables are not HTML-encoded by default. If the variables contain HTML tags, these may be interpreted by the browser, resulting in cross-site scripting (XSS).... | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| medium | opengrep/javascript.lang.security.html-in-template-string |
public/js/app.js:262 | This template literal looks like HTML and has interpolated variables. These variables are not HTML-encoded by default. If the variables contain HTML tags, these may be interpreted by the browser, resulting in cross-site scripting (XSS).... | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| medium | opengrep/javascript.lang.security.html-in-template-string |
public/js/app.js:285 | This template literal looks like HTML and has interpolated variables. These variables are not HTML-encoded by default. If the variables contain HTML tags, these may be interpreted by the browser, resulting in cross-site scripting (XSS).... | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| medium | opengrep/javascript.lang.security.html-in-template-string |
public/js/app.js:300 | This template literal looks like HTML and has interpolated variables. These variables are not HTML-encoded by default. If the variables contain HTML tags, these may be interpreted by the browser, resulting in cross-site scripting (XSS).... | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| medium | opengrep/javascript.lang.security.html-in-template-string |
public/js/app.js:302 | This template literal looks like HTML and has interpolated variables. These variables are not HTML-encoded by default. If the variables contain HTML tags, these may be interpreted by the browser, resulting in cross-site scripting (XSS).... | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| medium | opengrep/javascript.lang.security.html-in-template-string |
public/js/app.js:304 | This template literal looks like HTML and has interpolated variables. These variables are not HTML-encoded by default. If the variables contain HTML tags, these may be interpreted by the browser, resulting in cross-site scripting (XSS).... | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| medium | opengrep/javascript.lang.security.html-in-template-string |
public/js/app.js:307 | This template literal looks like HTML and has interpolated variables. These variables are not HTML-encoded by default. If the variables contain HTML tags, these may be interpreted by the browser, resulting in cross-site scripting (XSS).... | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| medium | opengrep/javascript.lang.security.html-in-template-string |
public/js/app.js:330 | This template literal looks like HTML and has interpolated variables. These variables are not HTML-encoded by default. If the variables contain HTML tags, these may be interpreted by the browser, resulting in cross-site scripting (XSS).... | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| medium | opengrep/javascript.lang.security.html-in-template-string |
public/js/app.js:336 | This template literal looks like HTML and has interpolated variables. These variables are not HTML-encoded by default. If the variables contain HTML tags, these may be interpreted by the browser, resulting in cross-site scripting (XSS).... | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| medium | opengrep/javascript.lang.security.html-in-template-string |
public/js/app.js:339 | This template literal looks like HTML and has interpolated variables. These variables are not HTML-encoded by default. If the variables contain HTML tags, these may be interpreted by the browser, resulting in cross-site scripting (XSS).... | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| medium | opengrep/javascript.lang.security.html-in-template-string |
public/js/app.js:366 | This template literal looks like HTML and has interpolated variables. These variables are not HTML-encoded by default. If the variables contain HTML tags, these may be interpreted by the browser, resulting in cross-site scripting (XSS).... | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| medium | opengrep/javascript.lang.security.html-in-template-string |
public/js/app.js:372 | This template literal looks like HTML and has interpolated variables. These variables are not HTML-encoded by default. If the variables contain HTML tags, these may be interpreted by the browser, resulting in cross-site scripting (XSS).... | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| medium | opengrep/javascript.lang.security.html-in-template-string |
public/js/app.js:381 | This template literal looks like HTML and has interpolated variables. These variables are not HTML-encoded by default. If the variables contain HTML tags, these may be interpreted by the browser, resulting in cross-site scripting (XSS).... | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| medium | opengrep/javascript.lang.security.html-in-template-string |
public/js/app.js:383 | This template literal looks like HTML and has interpolated variables. These variables are not HTML-encoded by default. If the variables contain HTML tags, these may be interpreted by the browser, resulting in cross-site scripting (XSS).... | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| medium | opengrep/javascript.lang.security.html-in-template-string |
public/js/app.js:423 | This template literal looks like HTML and has interpolated variables. These variables are not HTML-encoded by default. If the variables contain HTML tags, these may be interpreted by the browser, resulting in cross-site scripting (XSS).... | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| medium | opengrep/javascript.lang.security.html-in-template-string |
public/js/app.js:425 | This template literal looks like HTML and has interpolated variables. These variables are not HTML-encoded by default. If the variables contain HTML tags, these may be interpreted by the browser, resulting in cross-site scripting (XSS).... | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| medium | opengrep/javascript.lang.security.html-in-template-string |
public/js/app.js:426 | This template literal looks like HTML and has interpolated variables. These variables are not HTML-encoded by default. If the variables contain HTML tags, these may be interpreted by the browser, resulting in cross-site scripting (XSS).... | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| medium | opengrep/javascript.lang.security.html-in-template-string |
public/js/app.js:428 | This template literal looks like HTML and has interpolated variables. These variables are not HTML-encoded by default. If the variables contain HTML tags, these may be interpreted by the browser, resulting in cross-site scripting (XSS).... | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| medium | opengrep/javascript.lang.security.html-in-template-string |
public/js/app.js:430 | This template literal looks like HTML and has interpolated variables. These variables are not HTML-encoded by default. If the variables contain HTML tags, these may be interpreted by the browser, resulting in cross-site scripting (XSS).... | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| medium | opengrep/javascript.lang.security.html-in-template-string |
public/js/app.js:432 | This template literal looks like HTML and has interpolated variables. These variables are not HTML-encoded by default. If the variables contain HTML tags, these may be interpreted by the browser, resulting in cross-site scripting (XSS).... | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| medium | opengrep/javascript.lang.security.html-in-template-string |
public/js/app.js:435 | This template literal looks like HTML and has interpolated variables. These variables are not HTML-encoded by default. If the variables contain HTML tags, these may be interpreted by the browser, resulting in cross-site scripting (XSS).... | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| medium | opengrep/javascript.lang.security.html-in-template-string |
public/js/app.js:489 | This template literal looks like HTML and has interpolated variables. These variables are not HTML-encoded by default. If the variables contain HTML tags, these may be interpreted by the browser, resulting in cross-site scripting (XSS).... | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| medium | opengrep/javascript.lang.security.html-in-template-string |
public/js/app.js:497 | This template literal looks like HTML and has interpolated variables. These variables are not HTML-encoded by default. If the variables contain HTML tags, these may be interpreted by the browser, resulting in cross-site scripting (XSS).... | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| medium | opengrep/javascript.lang.security.html-in-template-string |
public/js/app.js:498 | This template literal looks like HTML and has interpolated variables. These variables are not HTML-encoded by default. If the variables contain HTML tags, these may be interpreted by the browser, resulting in cross-site scripting (XSS).... | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| medium | opengrep/javascript.lang.security.html-in-template-string |
public/js/app.js:498 | This template literal looks like HTML and has interpolated variables. These variables are not HTML-encoded by default. If the variables contain HTML tags, these may be interpreted by the browser, resulting in cross-site scripting (XSS).... | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| medium | opengrep/javascript.lang.security.html-in-template-string |
public/js/app.js:615 | This template literal looks like HTML and has interpolated variables. These variables are not HTML-encoded by default. If the variables contain HTML tags, these may be interpreted by the browser, resulting in cross-site scripting (XSS).... | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| medium | opengrep/javascript.lang.security.html-in-template-string |
public/js/app.js:656 | This template literal looks like HTML and has interpolated variables. These variables are not HTML-encoded by default. If the variables contain HTML tags, these may be interpreted by the browser, resulting in cross-site scripting (XSS).... | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| medium | opengrep/javascript.lang.security.html-in-template-string |
public/js/app.js:729 | This template literal looks like HTML and has interpolated variables. These variables are not HTML-encoded by default. If the variables contain HTML tags, these may be interpreted by the browser, resulting in cross-site scripting (XSS).... | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| medium | opengrep/javascript.lang.security.html-in-template-string |
public/js/app.js:740 | This template literal looks like HTML and has interpolated variables. These variables are not HTML-encoded by default. If the variables contain HTML tags, these may be interpreted by the browser, resulting in cross-site scripting (XSS).... | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| medium | opengrep/javascript.lang.security.html-in-template-string |
public/js/app.js:757 | This template literal looks like HTML and has interpolated variables. These variables are not HTML-encoded by default. If the variables contain HTML tags, these may be interpreted by the browser, resulting in cross-site scripting (XSS).... | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| medium | opengrep/javascript.lang.security.html-in-template-string |
public/js/app.js:790 | This template literal looks like HTML and has interpolated variables. These variables are not HTML-encoded by default. If the variables contain HTML tags, these may be interpreted by the browser, resulting in cross-site scripting (XSS).... | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| medium | opengrep/javascript.lang.security.html-in-template-string |
public/js/app.js:791 | This template literal looks like HTML and has interpolated variables. These variables are not HTML-encoded by default. If the variables contain HTML tags, these may be interpreted by the browser, resulting in cross-site scripting (XSS).... | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| medium | opengrep/javascript.lang.security.html-in-template-string |
public/js/app.js:797 | This template literal looks like HTML and has interpolated variables. These variables are not HTML-encoded by default. If the variables contain HTML tags, these may be interpreted by the browser, resulting in cross-site scripting (XSS).... | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| medium | opengrep/javascript.lang.security.html-in-template-string |
public/js/app.js:799 | This template literal looks like HTML and has interpolated variables. These variables are not HTML-encoded by default. If the variables contain HTML tags, these may be interpreted by the browser, resulting in cross-site scripting (XSS).... | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| medium | opengrep/javascript.lang.security.html-in-template-string |
public/js/app.js:807 | This template literal looks like HTML and has interpolated variables. These variables are not HTML-encoded by default. If the variables contain HTML tags, these may be interpreted by the browser, resulting in cross-site scripting (XSS).... | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| medium | opengrep/javascript.lang.security.html-in-template-string |
public/js/app.js:815 | This template literal looks like HTML and has interpolated variables. These variables are not HTML-encoded by default. If the variables contain HTML tags, these may be interpreted by the browser, resulting in cross-site scripting (XSS).... | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| medium | opengrep/javascript.lang.security.html-in-template-string |
public/js/app.js:818 | This template literal looks like HTML and has interpolated variables. These variables are not HTML-encoded by default. If the variables contain HTML tags, these may be interpreted by the browser, resulting in cross-site scripting (XSS).... | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| medium | opengrep/javascript.lang.security.html-in-template-string |
public/js/app.js:820 | This template literal looks like HTML and has interpolated variables. These variables are not HTML-encoded by default. If the variables contain HTML tags, these may be interpreted by the browser, resulting in cross-site scripting (XSS).... | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| medium | opengrep/javascript.lang.security.html-in-template-string |
public/js/app.js:821 | This template literal looks like HTML and has interpolated variables. These variables are not HTML-encoded by default. If the variables contain HTML tags, these may be interpreted by the browser, resulting in cross-site scripting (XSS).... | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| low | opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.missing-template-string-indicator |
public/js/app.js:153 | This looks like a JavaScript template string. Are you missing a '$' in front of '{...}'? | Lint |
| low | opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.missing-template-string-indicator |
public/js/app.js:153 | This looks like a JavaScript template string. Are you missing a '$' in front of '{...}'? | Lint |
| low | opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.missing-template-string-indicator |
public/js/app.js:157 | This looks like a JavaScript template string. Are you missing a '$' in front of '{...}'? | Lint |
| low | opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.missing-template-string-indicator |
public/js/app.js:161 | This looks like a JavaScript template string. Are you missing a '$' in front of '{...}'? | Lint |
| low | opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.missing-template-string-indicator |
public/js/app.js:161 | This looks like a JavaScript template string. Are you missing a '$' in front of '{...}'? | Lint |
| low | opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.missing-template-string-indicator |
public/js/app.js:161 | This looks like a JavaScript template string. Are you missing a '$' in front of '{...}'? | Lint |
| low | opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.missing-template-string-indicator |
public/js/app.js:171 | This looks like a JavaScript template string. Are you missing a '$' in front of '{...}'? | Lint |
| low | opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.missing-template-string-indicator |
public/js/app.js:174 | This looks like a JavaScript template string. Are you missing a '$' in front of '{...}'? | Lint |
| low | opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.missing-template-string-indicator |
public/js/app.js:177 | This looks like a JavaScript template string. Are you missing a '$' in front of '{...}'? | Lint |
| low | opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.missing-template-string-indicator |
public/js/app.js:180 | This looks like a JavaScript template string. Are you missing a '$' in front of '{...}'? | Lint |
| low | opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.missing-template-string-indicator |
public/js/app.js:254 | This looks like a JavaScript template string. Are you missing a '$' in front of '{...}'? | Lint |
| low | opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.missing-template-string-indicator |
public/js/app.js:254 | This looks like a JavaScript template string. Are you missing a '$' in front of '{...}'? | Lint |
| low | opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.missing-template-string-indicator |
public/js/app.js:285 | This looks like a JavaScript template string. Are you missing a '$' in front of '{...}'? | Lint |
| low | opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.missing-template-string-indicator |
public/js/app.js:285 | This looks like a JavaScript template string. Are you missing a '$' in front of '{...}'? | Lint |
| low | opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.missing-template-string-indicator |
public/js/app.js:335 | This looks like a JavaScript template string. Are you missing a '$' in front of '{...}'? | Lint |
| low | opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.missing-template-string-indicator |
public/js/app.js:335 | This looks like a JavaScript template string. Are you missing a '$' in front of '{...}'? | Lint |
| low | opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.missing-template-string-indicator |
public/js/app.js:335 | This looks like a JavaScript template string. Are you missing a '$' in front of '{...}'? | Lint |
| low | opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.missing-template-string-indicator |
public/js/app.js:335 | This looks like a JavaScript template string. Are you missing a '$' in front of '{...}'? | Lint |
| low | opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.missing-template-string-indicator |
public/js/app.js:335 | This looks like a JavaScript template string. Are you missing a '$' in front of '{...}'? | Lint |
| low | opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.missing-template-string-indicator |
public/js/app.js:335 | This looks like a JavaScript template string. Are you missing a '$' in front of '{...}'? | Lint |
| low | opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.missing-template-string-indicator |
public/js/app.js:335 | This looks like a JavaScript template string. Are you missing a '$' in front of '{...}'? | Lint |
| low | opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.missing-template-string-indicator |
public/js/app.js:335 | This looks like a JavaScript template string. Are you missing a '$' in front of '{...}'? | Lint |
| low | opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.missing-template-string-indicator |
public/js/app.js:512 | This looks like a JavaScript template string. Are you missing a '$' in front of '{...}'? | Lint |
| low | opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.missing-template-string-indicator |
public/js/app.js:512 | This looks like a JavaScript template string. Are you missing a '$' in front of '{...}'? | Lint |
| low | opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.missing-template-string-indicator |
public/js/app.js:605 | This looks like a JavaScript template string. Are you missing a '$' in front of '{...}'? | Lint |
| low | opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.missing-template-string-indicator |
public/js/app.js:605 | This looks like a JavaScript template string. Are you missing a '$' in front of '{...}'? | Lint |
| low | opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.missing-template-string-indicator |
public/js/app.js:656 | This looks like a JavaScript template string. Are you missing a '$' in front of '{...}'? | Lint |
| low | opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.missing-template-string-indicator |
public/js/app.js:656 | This looks like a JavaScript template string. Are you missing a '$' in front of '{...}'? | Lint |
| low | opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.missing-template-string-indicator |
public/js/app.js:748 | This looks like a JavaScript template string. Are you missing a '$' in front of '{...}'? | Lint |
| low | opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.missing-template-string-indicator |
public/js/app.js:748 | This looks like a JavaScript template string. Are you missing a '$' in front of '{...}'? | Lint |
| low | opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.missing-template-string-indicator |
public/js/app.js:764 | This looks like a JavaScript template string. Are you missing a '$' in front of '{...}'? | Lint |
| low | opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.missing-template-string-indicator |
public/js/app.js:764 | This looks like a JavaScript template string. Are you missing a '$' in front of '{...}'? | Lint |
| low | opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.missing-template-string-indicator |
public/js/app.js:94 | This looks like a JavaScript template string. Are you missing a '$' in front of '{...}'? | Lint |
| low | opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.missing-template-string-indicator |
public/js/app.js:94 | This looks like a JavaScript template string. Are you missing a '$' in front of '{...}'? | Lint |
| low | opengrep/bash.lang.correctness.unquoted-variable-expansion-in-command |
seed.sh:124 | Variable expansions must be double-quoted so as to prevent being split into multiple pieces according to whitespace or whichever separator is specified by the IFS variable. If you really wish to split the variable's contents, you may... | Lint |
| low | opengrep/bash.lang.correctness.unquoted-variable-expansion-in-command |
seed.sh:130 | Variable expansions must be double-quoted so as to prevent being split into multiple pieces according to whitespace or whichever separator is specified by the IFS variable. If you really wish to split the variable's contents, you may... | Lint |
| low | opengrep/bash.lang.correctness.unquoted-variable-expansion-in-command |
seed.sh:136 | Variable expansions must be double-quoted so as to prevent being split into multiple pieces according to whitespace or whichever separator is specified by the IFS variable. If you really wish to split the variable's contents, you may... | Lint |
| low | opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.useless-assignment |
server/routes/auth.js:4 | `const` is assigned twice; the first assignment is useless | Lint |
| low | opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.useless-assignment |
server/routes/auth.js:5 | `const` is assigned twice; the first assignment is useless | Lint |
| low | opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.useless-assignment |
server/routes/beneficiaries.js:2 | `const` is assigned twice; the first assignment is useless | Lint |
| low | opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.useless-assignment |
server/routes/beneficiaries.js:3 | `const` is assigned twice; the first assignment is useless | Lint |
| low | opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.useless-assignment |
server/routes/beneficiaries.js:4 | `const` is assigned twice; the first assignment is useless | Lint |
| low | opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.useless-assignment |
server/routes/deadswitch.js:2 | `const` is assigned twice; the first assignment is useless | Lint |
| low | opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.useless-assignment |
server/routes/deadswitch.js:3 | `const` is assigned twice; the first assignment is useless | Lint |
| low | opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.useless-assignment |
server/routes/vault.js:2 | `const` is assigned twice; the first assignment is useless | Lint |
| low | opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.useless-assignment |
server/routes/vault.js:3 | `const` is assigned twice; the first assignment is useless | Lint |
| low | opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.useless-assignment |
server/routes/vault.js:4 | `const` is assigned twice; the first assignment is useless | Lint |
| low | opengrep/javascript.express.security.audit.express-check-csurf-middleware-usage |
server/index.js:12 | A CSRF middleware was not detected in your express application. Ensure you are either using one such as `csurf` or `csrf` (see rule references) and/or you are properly doing CSRF validation in your routes with a token or cookies.... | Static analysis (opengrep) |
Tools and coverage
Every analyzer that ran on this commit. A failed or skipped tool is a coverage gap: its share of the score is left out and the coverage figure drops.
| Analyzer | Pillar | Status | Version | Findings | Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI tool configuration | AI provenance | ok | signatures-v1 | 0 | |
| Explicit AI attribution | AI provenance | ok | signatures-v1 | 0 | |
| Release velocity | AI provenance | skipped | — | 0 | |
| Coding style | AI provenance | ok | — | 0 | |
| Commit velocity | AI provenance | ok | prov-4 | 0 | |
| Findings in AI-written lines | AI provenance | ok | git-blame | 0 | |
| Complexity (lizard) | Code quality | ok | lizard 1.25.1 | 0 | |
| Documentation | Code quality | ok | — | 0 | |
| Duplication (jscpd) | Code quality | ok | repotrust-dup-w6 | 0 | |
| Lint | Code quality | ok | opengrep 1.33.1; rules f1d2b562b414 | 51 | |
| Tests and CI | Code quality | ok | — | 0 | |
| Type safety | Code quality | skipped | — | 0 | |
| CI workflows (zizmor) | Security | skipped | — | 0 | |
| Dependencies (osv-scanner) | Security | skipped | — | 0 | |
| Release downloads | Security | ok | — | 0 | |
| Security posture | Security | ok | — | 0 | |
| Package registries | Security | ok | — | 0 | |
| Static analysis (opengrep) | Security | ok | opengrep 1.33.1; rules f1d2b562b414 | 75 | |
| OpenSSF Scorecard | Security | skipped | — | 0 | no published OpenSSF Scorecard result for this repo |
| Secrets (gitleaks) | Security | ok | gitleaks 8.30.1 | 0 |
Score history
Scores from different scoring versions aren't directly comparable.
| Scored | Commit | Scoring | AI provenance | Quality | Security |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-11-14 | dca6f305c534 | prov-5+qual-2+sec-2 | 100% | 51 | 53 |
| 2026-11-14 | dca6f305c534 | prov-4+qual-2+sec-2 | 100% | 51 | 53 |
Full text report
- Repository: https://github.com/slavhate/legacy-vault
- Commit:
dca6f305c534207155b772734d47a6b1288fd3a1 - Generated: 2026-11-14T14:52:07+00:00
- Scorer 0.1.0, scoring prov-5+qual-2+sec-2, report schema v2
Scores
Unreviewed AI code risk: a large share of this code is explicitly AI-attributed, and its tests or review process are weak while quality or security scores are low.
| Pillar | Score | Signal | Confidence | Coverage |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI provenance (estimated AI-generated share) | 100 | explicit | 73% | 100% |
| Code quality | 51 | weak | 90% | 100% |
| Security | 53 | weak | 85% | 100% |
AI provenance
Explicit AI attribution on 100% of first-party code added; an estimated 100% including velocity signals.
- Explicitly attributed share (lower bound): 100.0%
- Unattributed share in AI-consistent velocity bursts: 0.0%
- Estimated AI-generated share: 100.0%
| AI tool | Attributed commits | Lines added |
|---|---|---|
| Claude Code | 12 | 2,174 |
Current source lines last changed by AI-attributed commits: 2,159 of 2,159.
Too few lines in one group to compare finding densities.
| Month | Lines added | Attributed to AI |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-04 | 2,174 | 100% |
Evidence
- Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (dca6f305c534)
- Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (14c3cf7dd908)
- Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (8f328a3277c3)
- Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (6be10ecbdcbf)
- Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (8148d2878938)
- Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (441ea45c11f2)
- Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (477736e26299)
- Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (d51248d73921)
- Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (03946c6136e7)
- Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (9402dbbb7477)
- Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (b4d591760a16)
- Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (c3488cdd3dcf)
AI provenance describes how code was produced; it is not a quality judgment. Unless attribution is explicit, these are signals consistent with AI generation, not proof. Squash/rebase workflows, imported code, and rewritten history reduce accuracy.
Code quality
Code quality is weak: test-to-source ratio 0.00, no CI test run detected; 2% of function code in complex or long functions; 0% duplicated lines. Weakest area: testing.
| Area | Score |
|---|---|
| Complexity (lizard) | 95 |
| Duplication | 100 |
| Code smells (Opengrep) | 16 |
| Tests and CI | 0 |
| Documentation | 65 |
| Type safety | n/a |
| Process (Scorecard review/maintenance) | n/a |
- Functions: 181; mean complexity 2.8, 90th percentile 6; 1 complex and 0 long functions
- Duplicated lines: 0.0% of 1,699 compared
- Tests: 0 test lines for 2,159 source lines (ratio 0.00); CI test commands: none detected; 0% of recent source commits also change tests
- Docs missing or thin: contributing, changelog
Most complex functions:
Security
Security posture is weak: 31 high-severity SAST findings. Weakest area: sast.
| Area | Score |
|---|---|
| Secrets (gitleaks, tree + history) | 100 |
| Static analysis (Opengrep) | 0 |
| Vulnerable dependencies (OSV) | n/a |
| CI workflows (zizmor) | n/a |
| Posture (policy, updates, signing, lockfiles) | 40 |
| OpenSSF Scorecard | n/a |
- Posture checks passed: security policy; missing: dependency updates, signed commits, lockfiles
Top findings
| Severity | Finding | Location |
|---|---|---|
| high | opengrep/dockerfile.security.missing-user: By not specifying a USER, a program in the container may run as 'root'. This is a security hazard. If an attacker can control a process running as root, they may have control over the container. Ensure that the last USER in a Dockerfile is a USER other than 'root'. [confidence medium] |
Dockerfile:37 |
| high | opengrep/dockerfile.security.missing-user: By not specifying a USER, a program in the container may run as 'root'. This is a security hazard. If an attacker can control a process running as root, they may have control over the container. Ensure that the last USER in a Dockerfile is a USER other than 'root'. [confidence medium] |
Dockerfile:40 |
| high | opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-document-method: User controlled data in methods like innerHTML, outerHTML or document.write is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] |
public/js/app.js:254 |
| high | opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-innerhtml: User controlled data in a app.innerHTML is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] |
public/js/app.js:254 |
| high | opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-document-method: User controlled data in methods like innerHTML, outerHTML or document.write is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] |
public/js/app.js:341 |
| high | opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-innerhtml: User controlled data in a app.innerHTML is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] |
public/js/app.js:341 |
| high | opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-document-method: User controlled data in methods like innerHTML, outerHTML or document.write is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] |
public/js/app.js:390 |
| high | opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-innerhtml: User controlled data in a app.innerHTML is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] |
public/js/app.js:390 |
| high | opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-document-method: User controlled data in methods like innerHTML, outerHTML or document.write is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] |
public/js/app.js:435 |
| high | opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-innerhtml: User controlled data in a app.innerHTML is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] |
public/js/app.js:435 |
| high | opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-document-method: User controlled data in methods like innerHTML, outerHTML or document.write is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] |
public/js/app.js:512 |
| high | opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-innerhtml: User controlled data in a app.innerHTML is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] |
public/js/app.js:512 |
| high | opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-document-method: User controlled data in methods like innerHTML, outerHTML or document.write is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] |
public/js/app.js:605 |
| high | opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-innerhtml: User controlled data in a app.innerHTML is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] |
public/js/app.js:605 |
| high | opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-document-method: User controlled data in methods like innerHTML, outerHTML or document.write is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] |
public/js/app.js:656 |
| high | opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-innerhtml: User controlled data in a app.innerHTML is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] |
public/js/app.js:656 |
| high | opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-document-method: User controlled data in methods like innerHTML, outerHTML or document.write is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] |
public/js/app.js:729 |
| high | opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-innerhtml: User controlled data in a $('#restore-result').innerHTML is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] |
public/js/app.js:729 |
| high | opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-document-method: User controlled data in methods like innerHTML, outerHTML or document.write is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] |
public/js/app.js:748 |
| high | opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-innerhtml: User controlled data in a app.innerHTML is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] |
public/js/app.js:748 |
| high | opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-document-method: User controlled data in methods like innerHTML, outerHTML or document.write is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] |
public/js/app.js:790 |
| high | opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-innerhtml: User controlled data in a result.innerHTML is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] |
public/js/app.js:790 |
| high | opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-document-method: User controlled data in methods like innerHTML, outerHTML or document.write is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] |
public/js/app.js:791 |
| high | opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-innerhtml: User controlled data in a result.innerHTML is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] |
public/js/app.js:791 |
| high | opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-document-method: User controlled data in methods like innerHTML, outerHTML or document.write is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] |
public/js/app.js:797 |
Static signals only: the scorer never runs the project's code. Secret findings are pattern matches that were not verified, and secret values are never stored.
Repository profile
- Source lines: 2,159; test lines: 0
| Language | Lines |
|---|---|
| JavaScript | 1,960 |
| Shell | 199 |