RepoTrust

Leaderboard github.com

sirTob1/pebble-pushup-reminder

  • View repository ↗
  • C
  • ★ 0
  • commit ec0b2a5bf566
  • scored 2026-11-14
  • scoring prov-5+qual-2+sec-2

AI provenance

0%

possible

Confidence
52%
Coverage
100%

Estimated share of AI-generated code. Explicit attribution is a lower bound.

Code quality

50/100

weak

Confidence
90%
Coverage
100%

Complexity, duplication, lint density, tests, CI, docs and review process.

Security

83/100

adequate

Confidence
85%
Coverage
100%

Secrets, static analysis, vulnerable dependencies, CI and supply-chain posture.

AI provenance

0% possible

Weak signals consistent with AI-assisted development.

How the score is built

  • Explicitly attributed share0%
  • Unattributed share in AI-pace bursts0%
  • Estimated AI-generated share0%
  • AI tool configuration files1
  • Work sessions at AI pace0
  • Releases at AI pacenot measured
  • Coding-style index (1.0+ means possible)0.00

Lines added per month all AI-attributed share

  1. 2026-062,504 · 0% AI
  2. 2026-07126 · 0% AI
  3. 2026-0884 · 0% AI
  4. 2026-09620 · 0% AI
  5. 2026-1054 · 0% AI

Evidence by analyzer

Explicit AI attributionok
attributed_commit_share
0.0%
attributed_commits
0
attributed_loc
0
attributed_loc_share
0.0%
commits
47
effective_loc
3,388
tools_detected
0
AI tool configurationok1 item
artifacts
1
earliest_adoption
2026-08-23
tools_configured
1
workflow_agents
0
Commit velocityok
excluded_import_loc
0
flagged_loc
0
flagged_loc_share
0.0%
flagged_units
0
max_loc_per_hour
366
measured_loc
3,388
median_loc_per_hour
127.69
pr_timed_units
1
pre_ai_era_burst_loc
0
pre_ai_era_bursts
0
pre_ai_era_measured_loc
0
work_units
19
Release velocityskipped
Coding styleok
count:assistant_voice
0
count:emoji_in_code
0
count:narrated_steps
0
count:placeholder
0
files:assistant_voice
0
files:emoji_in_code
0
files:narrated_steps
0
files:placeholder
0
index
0
lines_scanned
2,507
per_kloc:assistant_voice
0
per_kloc:emoji_in_code
0
per_kloc:narrated_steps
0
per_kloc:placeholder
0

Code quality

50 weak

Code quality is weak: test-to-source ratio 0.00, no CI test run detected; 23% of function code in complex or long functions; 3% duplicated lines. Weakest area: testing.

How the score is built

  • Complexity49
  • Duplication84
  • Lint and smells100
  • Tests and CI0
  • Documentation60
  • Type safety40
  • Review processnot measured

Evidence by analyzer

Complexity (lizard)ok5 items
complex_functions
5
function_nloc
1,703
functions
100
long_functions
2
many_param_functions
0
mean_ccn
3.90
p90_ccn
10
risky_nloc_share
23.5%
Duplication (jscpd)ok1 item
compared_lines
1,876
duplicated_lines
56
duplicated_share
3.0%
files
7
Lintok
findings
0
scanned_lines
2,507
weighted_findings
0
Tests and CIok
check:ci_present
no
check:ci_runs_lint
no
check:ci_runs_tests
no
check:has_tests
no
check:test_ratio
no
check:tests_cochange
no
ci_files
0
cochange_commits
32
cochange_share
0.0%
source_lines
2,507
test_lines
0
test_ratio
0
Documentationok2 items
  • README.md README.md
  • CHANGELOG.md CHANGELOG.md
check:changelog
yes
check:contributing
no
check:license
no
check:readme
yes
readme_lines
30
Type safetyok
check:low_escape_density
yes
check:strict_config
no
escapes
0
escapes_per_kloc
0

Security

83 adequate

Security posture is adequate: no high-impact findings. Weakest area: posture.

How the score is built

  • Secrets100
  • Static analysis (SAST)86
  • Vulnerable dependencies100
  • CI workflowsnot measured
  • Security posture0
  • OpenSSF Scorecardnot measured

Evidence by analyzer

OpenSSF Scorecardskipped

no published OpenSSF Scorecard result for this repo

Package registriesok
checked
1
declared
1
lookup_errors
0
missing
0
recent
0
Secrets (gitleaks)ok
secrets_current
0
secrets_history
0
secrets_low_confidence
0
secrets_nonprod
0
Static analysis (opengrep)ok
findings
3
findings_high
0
findings_low
0
findings_medium
3
parse_errors
0
scanned_lines
2,507
weighted_findings
1.10
Dependencies (osv-scanner)ok
penalty
0
vulnerabilities
0
vulnerable_packages
0
vulns_critical
0
vulns_high
0
vulns_low
0
vulns_medium
0
vulns_unknown
0
CI workflows (zizmor)skipped
Security postureok
check:dependency_updates
no
check:lockfiles
yes
check:security_policy
no
check:signed_commits
no
signed_commit_share
0.0%
unpinned_manifests
0
Release downloadsok
binary_assets
0
signals
0
suspicious
0

Findings

3 medium

SeverityRuleLocationMessageTool
medium opengrep/c.lang.security.insecure-use-memset src/c/main.c:210 When handling sensitive information in a buffer, it's important to ensure that the data is securely erased before the buffer is deleted or reused. While `memset()` is commonly used for this purpose, it can leave sensitive information... Static analysis (opengrep)
medium opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insufficient-postmessage-origin-validation src/pkjs/custom-clay.js:190 No validation of origin is done by the addEventListener API. It may be possible to exploit this flaw to perform Cross Origin attacks such as Cross-Site Scripting(XSS). [confidence low] Static analysis (opengrep)
medium opengrep/javascript.browser.security.wildcard-postmessage-configuration src/pkjs/custom-clay.js:194 The target origin of the window.postMessage() API is set to "*". This could allow for information disclosure due to the possibility of any origin allowed to receive the message. [confidence medium] Static analysis (opengrep)

Tools and coverage

Every analyzer that ran on this commit. A failed or skipped tool is a coverage gap: its share of the score is left out and the coverage figure drops.

AnalyzerPillarStatusVersionFindingsNote
AI tool configurationAI provenanceoksignatures-v10
Explicit AI attributionAI provenanceoksignatures-v10
Release velocityAI provenanceskipped—0
Coding styleAI provenanceok—0
Commit velocityAI provenanceokprov-40
Complexity (lizard)Code qualityoklizard 1.25.10
DocumentationCode qualityok—0
Duplication (jscpd)Code qualityokrepotrust-dup-w60
LintCode qualityokopengrep 1.33.1; rules f1d2b562b4140
Tests and CICode qualityok—0
Type safetyCode qualityok—0
CI workflows (zizmor)Securityskipped—0
Dependencies (osv-scanner)Securityokosv-scanner version: 2.7.10
Release downloadsSecurityok—0
Security postureSecurityok—0
Package registriesSecurityok—0
Static analysis (opengrep)Securityokopengrep 1.33.1; rules f1d2b562b4143
OpenSSF ScorecardSecurityskipped—0no published OpenSSF Scorecard result for this repo
Secrets (gitleaks)Securityokgitleaks 8.30.10

Score history

Scores from different scoring versions aren't directly comparable.

ScoredCommitScoringAI provenanceQualitySecurity
2026-11-14ec0b2a5bf566prov-5+qual-2+sec-20%5083
2026-11-14ec0b2a5bf566prov-4+qual-2+sec-20%5083

Embed a badge

Maintainers can show these in a README. Badges update when the repository is re-scored.

[![RepoTrust ai](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/badge/github.com/sirTob1/pebble-pushup-reminder/ai.svg)](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/r/github.com/sirTob1/pebble-pushup-reminder/)
[![RepoTrust quality](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/badge/github.com/sirTob1/pebble-pushup-reminder/quality.svg)](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/r/github.com/sirTob1/pebble-pushup-reminder/)
[![RepoTrust security](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/badge/github.com/sirTob1/pebble-pushup-reminder/security.svg)](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/r/github.com/sirTob1/pebble-pushup-reminder/)
Full text report

Scores

Pillar Score Signal Confidence Coverage
AI provenance (estimated AI-generated share) 0 possible 52% 100%
Code quality 50 weak 90% 100%
Security 83 adequate 85% 100%

AI provenance

Weak signals consistent with AI-assisted development.

  • Explicitly attributed share (lower bound): 0.0%

  • Unattributed share in AI-consistent velocity bursts: 0.0%

  • Estimated AI-generated share: 0.0%

  • AI tooling configured in repo: generic-agent

Month Lines added Attributed to AI
2026-06 2,504 0%
2026-07 126 0%
2026-08 84 0%
2026-09 620 0%
2026-10 54 0%

Evidence

  • .agents/AGENTS.md (generic-agent configuration) (.agents/AGEN)

AI provenance describes how code was produced; it is not a quality judgment. Unless attribution is explicit, these are signals consistent with AI generation, not proof. Squash/rebase workflows, imported code, and rewritten history reduce accuracy.

Code quality

Code quality is weak: test-to-source ratio 0.00, no CI test run detected; 23% of function code in complex or long functions; 3% duplicated lines. Weakest area: testing.

Area Score
Complexity (lizard) 49
Duplication 84
Code smells (Opengrep) 100
Tests and CI 0
Documentation 60
Type safety 40
Process (Scorecard review/maintenance) n/a
  • Functions: 100; mean complexity 3.9, 90th percentile 10; 5 complex and 2 long functions
  • Duplicated lines: 3.0% of 1,876 compared
  • Tests: 0 test lines for 2,507 source lines (ratio 0.00); CI test commands: none detected; 0% of recent source commits also change tests
  • Docs missing or thin: license, contributing

Most complex functions:

Security

Security posture is adequate: no high-impact findings. Weakest area: posture.

Area Score
Secrets (gitleaks, tree + history) 100
Static analysis (Opengrep) 86
Vulnerable dependencies (OSV) 100
CI workflows (zizmor) n/a
Posture (policy, updates, signing, lockfiles) 0
OpenSSF Scorecard n/a
  • Posture checks passed: lockfiles; missing: security policy, dependency updates, signed commits

Top findings

Severity Finding Location
medium opengrep/c.lang.security.insecure-use-memset: When handling sensitive information in a buffer, it's important to ensure that the data is securely erased before the buffer is deleted or reused. While memset() is commonly used for this purpose, it can leave sensitive information behind due to compiler optimizations or other factors. To avoi [confidence low] src/c/main.c:210
medium opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insufficient-postmessage-origin-validation: No validation of origin is done by the addEventListener API. It may be possible to exploit this flaw to perform Cross Origin attacks such as Cross-Site Scripting(XSS). [confidence low] src/pkjs/custom-clay.js:190
medium opengrep/javascript.browser.security.wildcard-postmessage-configuration: The target origin of the window.postMessage() API is set to "*". This could allow for information disclosure due to the possibility of any origin allowed to receive the message. [confidence medium] src/pkjs/custom-clay.js:194

Static signals only: the scorer never runs the project's code. Secret findings are pattern matches that were not verified, and secret values are never stored.

Repository profile

  • Source lines: 2,507; test lines: 0
Language Lines
C 1,729
JavaScript 534
Python 203
Shell 41