Leaderboard github.com
simplebits/Pears
AI provenance
0%
none-detected
- Confidence
- 42%
- Coverage
- 100%
Estimated share of AI-generated code. Explicit attribution is a lower bound.
Code quality
59/100
weak
- Confidence
- 90%
- Coverage
- 100%
Complexity, duplication, lint density, tests, CI, docs and review process.
Security
64/100
weak
- Confidence
- 85%
- Coverage
- 100%
Secrets, static analysis, vulnerable dependencies, CI and supply-chain posture.
AI provenance
0% none-detected
No AI attribution or AI-consistent velocity signals detected.
How the score is built
- Explicitly attributed share0%
- Unattributed share in AI-pace bursts0%
- Estimated AI-generated share0%
- AI tool configuration files0
- Work sessions at AI pace0
- Releases at AI pacenot measured
- Coding-style index (1.0+ means possible)0.00
Lines added per month all AI-attributed share
- 2012-021,621 · 0% AI
Evidence by analyzer
Explicit AI attributionok
- attributed_commit_share
- 0.0%
- attributed_commits
- 0
- attributed_loc
- 0
- attributed_loc_share
- 0.0%
- commits
- 9
- effective_loc
- 1,621
- tools_detected
- 0
AI tool configurationok
- artifacts
- 0
- tools_configured
- 0
- workflow_agents
- 0
Commit velocityok
- excluded_import_loc
- 0
- flagged_loc
- 0
- flagged_loc_share
- 0.0%
- flagged_units
- 0
- max_loc_per_hour
- 390
- measured_loc
- 1,621
- median_loc_per_hour
- 390
- pr_timed_units
- 0
- pre_ai_era_burst_loc
- 0
- pre_ai_era_bursts
- 0
- pre_ai_era_measured_loc
- 1,621
- work_units
- 4
Release velocityskipped
Coding styleok
- count:assistant_voice
- 0
- count:emoji_in_code
- 0
- count:narrated_steps
- 0
- count:placeholder
- 0
- files:assistant_voice
- 0
- files:emoji_in_code
- 0
- files:narrated_steps
- 0
- files:placeholder
- 0
- index
- 0
- lines_scanned
- 1,616
- per_kloc:assistant_voice
- 0
- per_kloc:emoji_in_code
- 0
- per_kloc:narrated_steps
- 0
- per_kloc:placeholder
- 0
Code quality
59 weak
Code quality is weak: test-to-source ratio 0.00, no CI test run detected; 1% of function code in complex or long functions; 8% duplicated lines. Weakest area: testing.
How the score is built
- Complexity98
- Duplication62
- Lint and smells96
- Tests and CI0
- Documentation65
- Type safetynot measured
- Review processnot measured
Evidence by analyzer
Complexity (lizard)ok3 items
- (anonymous) in js/less.js: complexity 31, 1 lines
- j in js/less.js: complexity 29, 1 lines
- toCSS in js/less.js: complexity 24, 1 lines
- complex_functions
- 3
- function_nloc
- 549
- functions
- 273
- long_functions
- 0
- many_param_functions
- 0
- mean_ccn
- 3.07
- p90_ccn
- 7
- risky_nloc_share
- 0.5%
Duplication (jscpd)ok6 items
- 6+ duplicated lines: 404.php:5 and archive.php:10
- 6+ duplicated lines: archive.php:8 and index.php:9
- 6+ duplicated lines: archive.php:11 and author.php:6
- 6+ duplicated lines: category.php:6 and tag.php:6
- 6+ duplicated lines: loop.php:97 and loop.php:162
- 6+ duplicated lines: onecolumn-page.php:18 and page.php:18
- compared_lines
- 1,160
- duplicated_lines
- 94
- duplicated_share
- 8.1%
- files
- 22
Lintok
- category:correctness
- 1
- findings
- 1
- scanned_lines
- 1,616
- weighted_findings
- 0.25
Tests and CIok
- check:ci_present
- no
- check:ci_runs_lint
- no
- check:ci_runs_tests
- no
- check:has_tests
- no
- check:test_ratio
- no
- check:tests_cochange
- no
- ci_files
- 0
- cochange_commits
- 5
- cochange_share
- 0.0%
- source_lines
- 1,616
- test_lines
- 0
- test_ratio
- 0
Documentationok2 items
- README
README - license.txt
license.txt
- check:changelog
- no
- check:contributing
- no
- check:license
- yes
- check:readme
- yes
- readme_lines
- 19
Type safetyskipped
Security
64 weak
Security posture is weak: 4 high-severity SAST findings. Weakest area: posture.
How the score is built
- Secrets100
- Static analysis (SAST)52
- Vulnerable dependenciesnot measured
- CI workflowsnot measured
- Security posture0
- OpenSSF Scorecardnot measured
Evidence by analyzer
OpenSSF Scorecardskipped
no published OpenSSF Scorecard result for this repo
Package registriesskipped
no registry dependencies declared
Secrets (gitleaks)ok
- secrets_current
- 0
- secrets_history
- 0
- secrets_low_confidence
- 0
- secrets_nonprod
- 0
Static analysis (opengrep)ok
- findings
- 4
- findings_high
- 4
- findings_low
- 0
- findings_medium
- 0
- parse_errors
- 0
- scanned_lines
- 1,616
- weighted_findings
- 3
Dependencies (osv-scanner)skipped
CI workflows (zizmor)skipped
Security postureok
- check:dependency_updates
- no
- check:lockfiles
- yes
- check:security_policy
- no
- check:signed_commits
- no
- signed_commit_share
- 0.0%
- unpinned_manifests
- 0
Release downloadsok
- binary_assets
- 0
- signals
- 0
- suspicious
- 0
Findings
4 high1 low
5 findings
| Severity | Rule | Location | Message | Tool |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| high | opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-document-method |
js/less.js:15 | User controlled data in methods like `innerHTML`, `outerHTML` or `document.write` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| high | opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-document-method |
js/less.js:15 | User controlled data in methods like `innerHTML`, `outerHTML` or `document.write` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| high | opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-innerhtml |
js/less.js:15 | User controlled data in a `f.innerHTML` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| high | opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-innerhtml |
js/less.js:15 | User controlled data in a `a[b].innerHTML` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| low | opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.useless-assignment |
js/less.js:15 | `i` is assigned twice; the first assignment is useless | Lint |
Tools and coverage
Every analyzer that ran on this commit. A failed or skipped tool is a coverage gap: its share of the score is left out and the coverage figure drops.
| Analyzer | Pillar | Status | Version | Findings | Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI tool configuration | AI provenance | ok | signatures-v1 | 0 | |
| Explicit AI attribution | AI provenance | ok | signatures-v1 | 0 | |
| Release velocity | AI provenance | skipped | — | 0 | |
| Coding style | AI provenance | ok | — | 0 | |
| Commit velocity | AI provenance | ok | prov-4 | 0 | |
| Complexity (lizard) | Code quality | ok | lizard 1.25.1 | 0 | |
| Documentation | Code quality | ok | — | 0 | |
| Duplication (jscpd) | Code quality | ok | repotrust-dup-w6 | 0 | |
| Lint | Code quality | ok | opengrep 1.33.1; rules f1d2b562b414 | 1 | |
| Tests and CI | Code quality | ok | — | 0 | |
| Type safety | Code quality | skipped | — | 0 | |
| CI workflows (zizmor) | Security | skipped | — | 0 | |
| Dependencies (osv-scanner) | Security | skipped | — | 0 | |
| Release downloads | Security | ok | — | 0 | |
| Security posture | Security | ok | — | 0 | |
| Package registries | Security | skipped | — | 0 | no registry dependencies declared |
| Static analysis (opengrep) | Security | ok | opengrep 1.33.1; rules f1d2b562b414 | 4 | |
| OpenSSF Scorecard | Security | skipped | — | 0 | no published OpenSSF Scorecard result for this repo |
| Secrets (gitleaks) | Security | ok | gitleaks 8.30.1 | 0 |
Score history
Scores from different scoring versions aren't directly comparable.
| Scored | Commit | Scoring | AI provenance | Quality | Security |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-11-14 | bd6211cdd2bf | prov-5+qual-2+sec-2 | 0% | 59 | 64 |
| 2026-11-14 | bd6211cdd2bf | prov-4+qual-2+sec-2 | 0% | 59 | 64 |
Full text report
- Repository: https://github.com/simplebits/Pears
- Commit:
bd6211cdd2bf08682716e0a0b080ebee5b90da0b - Generated: 2026-11-14T14:52:07+00:00
- Scorer 0.1.0, scoring prov-5+qual-2+sec-2, report schema v2
Scores
| Pillar | Score | Signal | Confidence | Coverage |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI provenance (estimated AI-generated share) | 0 | none-detected | 42% | 100% |
| Code quality | 59 | weak | 90% | 100% |
| Security | 64 | weak | 85% | 100% |
AI provenance
No AI attribution or AI-consistent velocity signals detected.
- Explicitly attributed share (lower bound): 0.0%
- Unattributed share in AI-consistent velocity bursts: 0.0%
- Estimated AI-generated share: 0.0%
| Month | Lines added | Attributed to AI |
|---|---|---|
| 2012-02 | 1,621 | 0% |
AI provenance describes how code was produced; it is not a quality judgment. Unless attribution is explicit, these are signals consistent with AI generation, not proof. Squash/rebase workflows, imported code, and rewritten history reduce accuracy.
Code quality
Code quality is weak: test-to-source ratio 0.00, no CI test run detected; 1% of function code in complex or long functions; 8% duplicated lines. Weakest area: testing.
| Area | Score |
|---|---|
| Complexity (lizard) | 98 |
| Duplication | 62 |
| Code smells (Opengrep) | 96 |
| Tests and CI | 0 |
| Documentation | 65 |
| Type safety | n/a |
| Process (Scorecard review/maintenance) | n/a |
- Functions: 273; mean complexity 3.1, 90th percentile 7; 3 complex and 0 long functions
- Duplicated lines: 8.1% of 1,160 compared
- Tests: 0 test lines for 1,616 source lines (ratio 0.00); CI test commands: none detected; 0% of recent source commits also change tests
- Docs missing or thin: contributing, changelog
Most complex functions:
- (anonymous) in js/less.js: complexity 31, 1 lines
- j in js/less.js: complexity 29, 1 lines
- toCSS in js/less.js: complexity 24, 1 lines
Security
Security posture is weak: 4 high-severity SAST findings. Weakest area: posture.
| Area | Score |
|---|---|
| Secrets (gitleaks, tree + history) | 100 |
| Static analysis (Opengrep) | 52 |
| Vulnerable dependencies (OSV) | n/a |
| CI workflows (zizmor) | n/a |
| Posture (policy, updates, signing, lockfiles) | 0 |
| OpenSSF Scorecard | n/a |
- Posture checks passed: lockfiles; missing: security policy, dependency updates, signed commits
Top findings
| Severity | Finding | Location |
|---|---|---|
| high | opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-document-method: User controlled data in methods like innerHTML, outerHTML or document.write is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] |
js/less.js:15 |
| high | opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-innerhtml: User controlled data in a f.innerHTML is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] |
js/less.js:15 |
| high | opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-document-method: User controlled data in methods like innerHTML, outerHTML or document.write is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] |
js/less.js:15 |
| high | opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-innerhtml: User controlled data in a a[b].innerHTML is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] |
js/less.js:15 |
Static signals only: the scorer never runs the project's code. Secret findings are pattern matches that were not verified, and secret values are never stored.
Repository profile
- Source lines: 1,616; test lines: 0
| Language | Lines |
|---|---|
| PHP | 1,600 |
| JavaScript | 16 |