Leaderboard github.com

simon141/pabloagent

Pablo Agent is an AI chat application that uses Claude Code, Codex and other CLIs over SSH as a backend.

View repository ↗
Rust
★ 9
commit bbb339979aee
scored 2026-11-14
scoring prov-5+qual-2+sec-2

AI provenance

10%

explicit

Confidence: 95%
Coverage: 100%

Estimated share of AI-generated code. Explicit attribution is a lower bound.

Code quality

77/100

adequate

Confidence: 90%
Coverage: 100%

Complexity, duplication, lint density, tests, CI, docs and review process.

Security

52/100

weak

Confidence: 85%
Coverage: 100%

Secrets, static analysis, vulnerable dependencies, CI and supply-chain posture.

Dispute or request a re-score Full report JSON

AI provenance

10% explicit

Explicit AI attribution on 10% of first-party code added; an estimated 10% including velocity signals.

How the score is built

Explicitly attributed share10%
Unattributed share in AI-pace bursts0%
Estimated AI-generated share10%
AI tool configuration files2
Work sessions at AI pace0
Releases at AI pace0
Coding-style index (1.0+ means possible)0.30

Attributed AI tools

Tool	Commits	Lines added	First seen	Last seen
Claude Code	45	2,580	2026-08-30	2026-10-23

Lines added per month all AI-attributed share

2026-0822,650 · 1% AI
2026-093,642 · 53% AI
2026-10412 · 100% AI

Findings in AI-attributed lines vs the rest

From git blame: 1,826 lines trace to AI-attributed commits, 19,546 to others. Reported, not scored.

Findings per 1,000 lines	AI-attributed	Other	Ratio
Code quality	0.00	0.56	0.00×
Security	0.55	2.05	0.27×

Evidence by analyzer

Explicit AI attributionok26 items

attributed_commit_share: 42.9%
attributed_commits: 45
attributed_loc: 2,580
attributed_loc_share: 9.7%
commits: 105
effective_loc: 26,704
tools_detected: 1

AI tool configurationok2 items

artifacts: 2
earliest_adoption: 2026-08-28
tools_configured: 2
workflow_agents: 0

Commit velocityok

excluded_import_loc: 22,343
flagged_loc: 0
flagged_loc_share: 0.0%
flagged_units: 0
max_loc_per_hour: 239.65
measured_loc: 4,361
median_loc_per_hour: 64.65
pr_timed_units: 0
pre_ai_era_burst_loc: 0
pre_ai_era_bursts: 0
pre_ai_era_measured_loc: 0
work_units: 43

Release velocityok

flagged_releases: 0
max_loc_per_day: 532.40
releases: 4

Coding styleok

count:assistant_voice: 0
count:emoji_in_code: 13
count:narrated_steps: 0
count:placeholder: 0
files:assistant_voice: 0
files:emoji_in_code: 4
files:narrated_steps: 0
files:placeholder: 0
index: 0.30
lines_scanned: 21,372
per_kloc:assistant_voice: 0
per_kloc:emoji_in_code: 0.61
per_kloc:narrated_steps: 0
per_kloc:placeholder: 0

Findings in AI-written linesok

ai_lines: 1,826
blame_failures: 0
files_blamed: 44
other_lines: 19,546
quality:ai_findings: 0
quality:ai_per_kloc: 0
quality:other_findings: 11
quality:other_per_kloc: 0.56
quality:ratio: 0
security:ai_findings: 1
security:ai_per_kloc: 0.55
security:other_findings: 40
security:other_per_kloc: 2.05
security:ratio: 0.27

Code quality

77 adequate

Code quality is adequate: test-to-source ratio 0.18, CI runs tests; 16% of function code in complex or long functions; 3% duplicated lines. Weakest area: complexity.

How the score is built

Complexity62
Duplication83
Lint and smells89
Tests and CI79
Documentation65
Type safety100
Review processnot measured

Evidence by analyzer

Complexity (lizard)ok10 items

complex_functions: 31
function_nloc: 14,594
functions: 1,221
long_functions: 7
many_param_functions: 1
mean_ccn: 3.22
p90_ccn: 7
risky_nloc_share: 16.1%

Duplication (jscpd)ok10 items

compared_lines: 16,426
duplicated_lines: 514
duplicated_share: 3.1%
files: 44

Lintok

category:best-practice: 1
category:correctness: 10
findings: 11
scanned_lines: 21,372
weighted_findings: 10.25

Tests and CIok5 items

CI config: .github/workflows/android-release.yml .github/workflows/android-release.yml
CI config: .github/workflows/checks.yml .github/workflows/checks.yml
CI config: .github/workflows/pr-build-downloads.yml .github/workflows/pr-build-downloads.yml
CI runs tests (go test, cargo test)
CI runs linters (biome, clippy, rustfmt, cargo fmt)

check:ci_present: yes
check:ci_runs_lint: yes
check:ci_runs_tests: yes
check:has_tests: yes
check:test_ratio: no
check:tests_cochange: no
ci_files: 3
cochange_commits: 76
cochange_share: 13.2%
source_lines: 21,372
test_lines: 3,759
test_ratio: 0.18

Documentationok2 items

README.md README.md
LICENSE LICENSE

check:changelog: no
check:contributing: no
check:license: yes
check:readme: yes
readme_lines: 234

Type safetyok1 item

TypeScript strict type checking: tsconfig.json tsconfig.json

check:low_escape_density: yes
check:strict_config: yes
escapes: 1
escapes_per_kloc: 0.09

Security

52 weak

Security posture is weak: 35 known vulnerabilities in 18 dependencies; 8 high-severity SAST findings; 33 high-severity workflow issues. Weakest area: posture.

How the score is built

Secrets97
Static analysis (SAST)79
Vulnerable dependencies32
CI workflows0
Security posture0
OpenSSF Scorecardnot measured

Evidence by analyzer

OpenSSF Scorecardskipped

no published OpenSSF Scorecard result for this repo

Package registriesok

checked: 22
declared: 22
lookup_errors: 0
missing: 0
recent: 0

Secrets (gitleaks)ok

secrets_current: 0
secrets_history: 0
secrets_low_confidence: 0
secrets_nonprod: 1

Static analysis (opengrep)ok

findings: 41
findings_high: 8
findings_low: 9
findings_medium: 24
parse_errors: 3
scanned_lines: 21,372
weighted_findings: 14.25

Dependencies (osv-scanner)ok

penalty: 69
vulnerabilities: 35
vulnerable_packages: 18
vulns_critical: 0
vulns_high: 4
vulns_low: 7
vulns_medium: 11
vulns_unknown: 13

CI workflows (zizmor)ok

findings: 34
findings_high: 33
findings_low: 1
findings_medium: 0
penalty: 325
workflows: 3

Security postureok

check:dependency_updates: no
check:lockfiles: yes
check:security_policy: no
check:signed_commits: no
signed_commit_share: 0.9%
unpinned_manifests: 0

Release downloadsok6 items

release continuous ships pabloagent-android-arm64.apk (0 downloads)
release continuous ships pabloagent-linux-aarch64.AppImage (0 downloads)
release continuous ships pabloagent-linux-aarch64.deb (0 downloads)
release continuous ships pabloagent-linux-aarch64.rpm (0 downloads)
release continuous ships pabloagent-linux-x86_64.AppImage (0 downloads)
links directly to a downloadable archive or installer README.md

binary_assets: 43
signals: 2
suspicious: 0

Findings

45 high58 medium19 low

Severity	Rule	Location	Message	Tool
high	`zizmor/unpinned-uses`	.github/workflows/android-release.yml:119	unpinned action reference [confidence high]	CI workflows (zizmor)
high	`zizmor/cache-poisoning`	.github/workflows/android-release.yml:123	runtime artifacts potentially vulnerable to a cache poisoning attack [confidence low]	CI workflows (zizmor)
high	`zizmor/unpinned-uses`	.github/workflows/android-release.yml:123	unpinned action reference [confidence high]	CI workflows (zizmor)
high	`zizmor/cache-poisoning`	.github/workflows/android-release.yml:131	runtime artifacts potentially vulnerable to a cache poisoning attack [confidence low]	CI workflows (zizmor)
high	`zizmor/unpinned-uses`	.github/workflows/android-release.yml:131	unpinned action reference [confidence high]	CI workflows (zizmor)
high	`zizmor/unpinned-uses`	.github/workflows/android-release.yml:181	unpinned action reference [confidence high]	CI workflows (zizmor)
high	`zizmor/unpinned-uses`	.github/workflows/android-release.yml:197	unpinned action reference [confidence high]	CI workflows (zizmor)
high	`zizmor/cache-poisoning`	.github/workflows/android-release.yml:201	runtime artifacts potentially vulnerable to a cache poisoning attack [confidence low]	CI workflows (zizmor)
high	`zizmor/unpinned-uses`	.github/workflows/android-release.yml:201	unpinned action reference [confidence high]	CI workflows (zizmor)
high	`zizmor/cache-poisoning`	.github/workflows/android-release.yml:211	runtime artifacts potentially vulnerable to a cache poisoning attack [confidence low]	CI workflows (zizmor)
high	`zizmor/unpinned-uses`	.github/workflows/android-release.yml:211	unpinned action reference [confidence high]	CI workflows (zizmor)
high	`zizmor/unpinned-uses`	.github/workflows/android-release.yml:257	unpinned action reference [confidence high]	CI workflows (zizmor)
high	`zizmor/unpinned-uses`	.github/workflows/android-release.yml:26	unpinned action reference [confidence high]	CI workflows (zizmor)
high	`zizmor/unpinned-uses`	.github/workflows/android-release.yml:269	unpinned action reference [confidence high]	CI workflows (zizmor)
high	`zizmor/cache-poisoning`	.github/workflows/android-release.yml:273	runtime artifacts potentially vulnerable to a cache poisoning attack [confidence low]	CI workflows (zizmor)
high	`zizmor/unpinned-uses`	.github/workflows/android-release.yml:273	unpinned action reference [confidence high]	CI workflows (zizmor)
high	`zizmor/cache-poisoning`	.github/workflows/android-release.yml:285	runtime artifacts potentially vulnerable to a cache poisoning attack [confidence low]	CI workflows (zizmor)
high	`zizmor/unpinned-uses`	.github/workflows/android-release.yml:285	unpinned action reference [confidence high]	CI workflows (zizmor)
high	`zizmor/cache-poisoning`	.github/workflows/android-release.yml:30	runtime artifacts potentially vulnerable to a cache poisoning attack [confidence low]	CI workflows (zizmor)
high	`zizmor/unpinned-uses`	.github/workflows/android-release.yml:30	unpinned action reference [confidence high]	CI workflows (zizmor)
high	`zizmor/unpinned-uses`	.github/workflows/android-release.yml:315	unpinned action reference [confidence high]	CI workflows (zizmor)
high	`zizmor/unpinned-uses`	.github/workflows/android-release.yml:333	unpinned action reference [confidence high]	CI workflows (zizmor)
high	`zizmor/unpinned-uses`	.github/workflows/android-release.yml:343	unpinned action reference [confidence high]	CI workflows (zizmor)
high	`zizmor/unpinned-uses`	.github/workflows/android-release.yml:35	unpinned action reference [confidence high]	CI workflows (zizmor)
high	`zizmor/cache-poisoning`	.github/workflows/android-release.yml:45	runtime artifacts potentially vulnerable to a cache poisoning attack [confidence low]	CI workflows (zizmor)
high	`zizmor/unpinned-uses`	.github/workflows/android-release.yml:45	unpinned action reference [confidence high]	CI workflows (zizmor)
high	`zizmor/unpinned-uses`	.github/workflows/android-release.yml:92	unpinned action reference [confidence high]	CI workflows (zizmor)
high	`zizmor/unpinned-uses`	.github/workflows/checks.yml:15	unpinned action reference [confidence high]	CI workflows (zizmor)
high	`zizmor/unpinned-uses`	.github/workflows/checks.yml:19	unpinned action reference [confidence high]	CI workflows (zizmor)
high	`zizmor/unpinned-uses`	.github/workflows/checks.yml:43	unpinned action reference [confidence high]	CI workflows (zizmor)
high	`zizmor/unpinned-uses`	.github/workflows/checks.yml:52	unpinned action reference [confidence high]	CI workflows (zizmor)
high	`zizmor/unpinned-uses`	.github/workflows/pr-build-downloads.yml:19	unpinned action reference [confidence high]	CI workflows (zizmor)
high	`zizmor/dangerous-triggers`	.github/workflows/pr-build-downloads.yml:4	use of fundamentally insecure workflow trigger [confidence medium]	CI workflows (zizmor)
high	`osv/GHSA-587h-7wmj-h5pm`	package-lock.json	[email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-587h-7wmj-h5pm	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
high	`osv/GHSA-68fv-2mgg-jv7q`	package-lock.json	[email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-68fv-2mgg-jv7q	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
high	`osv/GHSA-47hw-gvq5-r2gm`	src-tauri/Cargo.lock	[email protected] (crates.io) is affected by RUSTSEC-2026-0492, GHSA-47hw-gvq5-r2gm	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
high	`osv/GHSA-vp5q-ff62-jwqv`	src-tauri/Cargo.lock	[email protected] (crates.io) is affected by RUSTSEC-2026-0495, GHSA-vp5q-ff62-jwqv	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
high	`opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-document-method`	src/main.ts:1538	User controlled data in methods like `innerHTML`, `outerHTML` or `document.write` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low]	Static analysis (opengrep)
high	`opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-innerhtml`	src/main.ts:1538	User controlled data in a `el.innerHTML` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low]	Static analysis (opengrep)
high	`opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-document-method`	src/main.ts:3292	User controlled data in methods like `innerHTML`, `outerHTML` or `document.write` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low]	Static analysis (opengrep)
high	`opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-innerhtml`	src/main.ts:3292	User controlled data in a `model.innerHTML` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low]	Static analysis (opengrep)
high	`opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-document-method`	src/transcript.ts:1742	User controlled data in methods like `innerHTML`, `outerHTML` or `document.write` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low]	Static analysis (opengrep)
high	`opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-innerhtml`	src/transcript.ts:1742	User controlled data in a `body.innerHTML` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low]	Static analysis (opengrep)
high	`opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-document-method`	src/transcript.ts:642	User controlled data in methods like `innerHTML`, `outerHTML` or `document.write` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low]	Static analysis (opengrep)
high	`opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-innerhtml`	src/transcript.ts:642	User controlled data in a `el.innerHTML` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low]	Static analysis (opengrep)
medium	`opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.no-stringify-keys`	scripts/check-rollout.mjs:1126	JSON stringify does not produce a stable key ordering, and should not be relied on for producing object keys. Consider using json-stable-stringify instead.	Lint
medium	`opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.no-stringify-keys`	scripts/check-rollout.mjs:1132	JSON stringify does not produce a stable key ordering, and should not be relied on for producing object keys. Consider using json-stable-stringify instead.	Lint
medium	`opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.no-stringify-keys`	scripts/check-rollout.mjs:1180	JSON stringify does not produce a stable key ordering, and should not be relied on for producing object keys. Consider using json-stable-stringify instead.	Lint
medium	`opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.no-stringify-keys`	scripts/check-rollout.mjs:1187	JSON stringify does not produce a stable key ordering, and should not be relied on for producing object keys. Consider using json-stable-stringify instead.	Lint
medium	`opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.no-stringify-keys`	scripts/check-rollout.mjs:1210	JSON stringify does not produce a stable key ordering, and should not be relied on for producing object keys. Consider using json-stable-stringify instead.	Lint
medium	`opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.no-stringify-keys`	scripts/check-rollout.mjs:150	JSON stringify does not produce a stable key ordering, and should not be relied on for producing object keys. Consider using json-stable-stringify instead.	Lint
medium	`opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.no-stringify-keys`	scripts/check-rollout.mjs:334	JSON stringify does not produce a stable key ordering, and should not be relied on for producing object keys. Consider using json-stable-stringify instead.	Lint
medium	`opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.no-stringify-keys`	scripts/check-rollout.mjs:522	JSON stringify does not produce a stable key ordering, and should not be relied on for producing object keys. Consider using json-stable-stringify instead.	Lint
medium	`opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.no-stringify-keys`	scripts/check-rollout.mjs:674	JSON stringify does not produce a stable key ordering, and should not be relied on for producing object keys. Consider using json-stable-stringify instead.	Lint
medium	`opengrep/bash.lang.best-practice.useless-cat`	src-tauri/src/turn.sh:264	Useless call to 'cat' in a pipeline. Use '<' and '>' for any command to read from a file or write to a file.	Lint
medium	`osv/GHSA-698v-4r3x-3vcv`	package-lock.json	[email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-698v-4r3x-3vcv	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
medium	`osv/GHSA-r825-w8mm-5pxw`	package-lock.json	[email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-r825-w8mm-5pxw	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
medium	`osv/GHSA-rq7h-c2jc-7f22`	package-lock.json	[email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-rq7h-c2jc-7f22	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
medium	`osv/GHSA-35g8-35p8-c8fw`	src-tauri/Cargo.lock	[email protected] (crates.io) is affected by GHSA-35g8-35p8-c8fw	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
medium	`osv/GHSA-4p9f-7p9m-5vfg`	src-tauri/Cargo.lock	[email protected] (crates.io) is affected by GHSA-4p9f-7p9m-5vfg	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
medium	`osv/GHSA-4wc5-f2rc-q74m`	src-tauri/Cargo.lock	[email protected] (crates.io) is affected by GHSA-4wc5-f2rc-q74m	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
medium	`osv/GHSA-fw5c-8223-6h42`	src-tauri/Cargo.lock	[email protected] (crates.io) is affected by GHSA-fw5c-8223-6h42	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
medium	`osv/GHSA-g4mp-vgx3-xrvm`	src-tauri/Cargo.lock	[email protected] (crates.io) is affected by GHSA-g4mp-vgx3-xrvm	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
medium	`osv/GHSA-m65r-rprj-r5rg`	src-tauri/Cargo.lock	[email protected] (crates.io) is affected by GHSA-m65r-rprj-r5rg	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
medium	`osv/GHSA-w3jg-pjxf-73p4`	src-tauri/Cargo.lock	[email protected] (crates.io) is affected by GHSA-w3jg-pjxf-73p4	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
medium	`osv/GHSA-wrw7-89jp-8q8g`	src-tauri/Cargo.lock	[email protected] (crates.io) is affected by RUSTSEC-2024-0429, GHSA-wrw7-89jp-8q8g	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
medium	`osv/RUSTSEC-2024-0370`	src-tauri/Cargo.lock	[email protected] (crates.io) is affected by RUSTSEC-2024-0370	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
medium	`osv/RUSTSEC-2025-0075`	src-tauri/Cargo.lock	[email protected] (crates.io) is affected by RUSTSEC-2025-0075	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
medium	`osv/RUSTSEC-2025-0080`	src-tauri/Cargo.lock	[email protected] (crates.io) is affected by RUSTSEC-2025-0080	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
medium	`osv/RUSTSEC-2025-0081`	src-tauri/Cargo.lock	[email protected] (crates.io) is affected by RUSTSEC-2025-0081	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
medium	`osv/RUSTSEC-2025-0098`	src-tauri/Cargo.lock	[email protected] (crates.io) is affected by RUSTSEC-2025-0098	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
medium	`osv/RUSTSEC-2025-0100`	src-tauri/Cargo.lock	[email protected] (crates.io) is affected by RUSTSEC-2025-0100	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
medium	`osv/RUSTSEC-2026-0370`	src-tauri/Cargo.lock	[email protected] (crates.io) is affected by RUSTSEC-2026-0370	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
medium	`osv/RUSTSEC-2026-0371`	src-tauri/Cargo.lock	[email protected] (crates.io) is affected by RUSTSEC-2026-0371	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
medium	`osv/RUSTSEC-2026-0372`	src-tauri/Cargo.lock	[email protected] (crates.io) is affected by RUSTSEC-2026-0372	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
medium	`osv/RUSTSEC-2026-0385`	src-tauri/Cargo.lock	[email protected] (crates.io) is affected by RUSTSEC-2026-0385	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
medium	`osv/RUSTSEC-2026-0386`	src-tauri/Cargo.lock	[email protected] (crates.io) is affected by RUSTSEC-2026-0386	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
medium	`osv/RUSTSEC-2026-0387`	src-tauri/Cargo.lock	[email protected] (crates.io) is affected by RUSTSEC-2026-0387	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
medium	`osv/RUSTSEC-2026-0486`	src-tauri/Cargo.lock	[email protected] (crates.io) is affected by RUSTSEC-2026-0486	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
medium	`opengrep/javascript.jquery.security.audit.jquery-insecure-selector`	src/main.ts:213	User controlled data in a `$(...)` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low]	Static analysis (opengrep)
medium	`opengrep/javascript.lang.security.html-in-template-string`	src/main.ts:3292	This template literal looks like HTML and has interpolated variables. These variables are not HTML-encoded by default. If the variables contain HTML tags, these may be interpreted by the browser, resulting in cross-site scripting (XSS)....	Static analysis (opengrep)
medium	`opengrep/javascript.jquery.security.audit.jquery-insecure-selector`	src/main.ts:531	User controlled data in a `$(...)` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low]	Static analysis (opengrep)
medium	`opengrep/javascript.jquery.security.audit.jquery-insecure-selector`	src/main.ts:540	User controlled data in a `$(...)` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low]	Static analysis (opengrep)
medium	`opengrep/javascript.jquery.security.audit.jquery-insecure-selector`	src/main.ts:547	User controlled data in a `$(...)` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low]	Static analysis (opengrep)
medium	`opengrep/javascript.lang.security.html-in-template-string`	src/transcript.ts:179	This template literal looks like HTML and has interpolated variables. These variables are not HTML-encoded by default. If the variables contain HTML tags, these may be interpreted by the browser, resulting in cross-site scripting (XSS)....	Static analysis (opengrep)
medium	`opengrep/javascript.lang.security.html-in-template-string`	src/transcript.ts:185	This template literal looks like HTML and has interpolated variables. These variables are not HTML-encoded by default. If the variables contain HTML tags, these may be interpreted by the browser, resulting in cross-site scripting (XSS)....	Static analysis (opengrep)
medium	`opengrep/javascript.lang.security.html-in-template-string`	src/transcript.ts:186	This template literal looks like HTML and has interpolated variables. These variables are not HTML-encoded by default. If the variables contain HTML tags, these may be interpreted by the browser, resulting in cross-site scripting (XSS)....	Static analysis (opengrep)
medium	`opengrep/javascript.lang.security.html-in-template-string`	src/transcript.ts:266	This template literal looks like HTML and has interpolated variables. These variables are not HTML-encoded by default. If the variables contain HTML tags, these may be interpreted by the browser, resulting in cross-site scripting (XSS)....	Static analysis (opengrep)
medium	`opengrep/javascript.lang.security.html-in-template-string`	src/transcript.ts:282	This template literal looks like HTML and has interpolated variables. These variables are not HTML-encoded by default. If the variables contain HTML tags, these may be interpreted by the browser, resulting in cross-site scripting (XSS)....	Static analysis (opengrep)
medium	`opengrep/javascript.lang.security.html-in-template-string`	src/transcript.ts:389	This template literal looks like HTML and has interpolated variables. These variables are not HTML-encoded by default. If the variables contain HTML tags, these may be interpreted by the browser, resulting in cross-site scripting (XSS)....	Static analysis (opengrep)
medium	`opengrep/javascript.lang.security.html-in-template-string`	src/transcript.ts:392	This template literal looks like HTML and has interpolated variables. These variables are not HTML-encoded by default. If the variables contain HTML tags, these may be interpreted by the browser, resulting in cross-site scripting (XSS)....	Static analysis (opengrep)
medium	`opengrep/javascript.lang.security.html-in-template-string`	src/transcript.ts:395	This template literal looks like HTML and has interpolated variables. These variables are not HTML-encoded by default. If the variables contain HTML tags, these may be interpreted by the browser, resulting in cross-site scripting (XSS)....	Static analysis (opengrep)
medium	`opengrep/javascript.lang.security.html-in-template-string`	src/transcript.ts:467	This template literal looks like HTML and has interpolated variables. These variables are not HTML-encoded by default. If the variables contain HTML tags, these may be interpreted by the browser, resulting in cross-site scripting (XSS)....	Static analysis (opengrep)
medium	`opengrep/javascript.lang.security.html-in-template-string`	src/transcript.ts:474	This template literal looks like HTML and has interpolated variables. These variables are not HTML-encoded by default. If the variables contain HTML tags, these may be interpreted by the browser, resulting in cross-site scripting (XSS)....	Static analysis (opengrep)
medium	`opengrep/javascript.lang.security.html-in-template-string`	src/transcript.ts:486	This template literal looks like HTML and has interpolated variables. These variables are not HTML-encoded by default. If the variables contain HTML tags, these may be interpreted by the browser, resulting in cross-site scripting (XSS)....	Static analysis (opengrep)
medium	`opengrep/javascript.lang.security.audit.detect-redos`	src/transcript.ts:519	Detected the use of a regular expression `^\s(?:[-_]\s*){3,}$` which appears to be vulnerable to a Regular expression Denial-of-Service (ReDoS). For this reason, it is recommended to review the regex and ensure it is not vulnerable to...	Static analysis (opengrep)
medium	`opengrep/javascript.lang.security.html-in-template-string`	src/transcript.ts:544	This template literal looks like HTML and has interpolated variables. These variables are not HTML-encoded by default. If the variables contain HTML tags, these may be interpreted by the browser, resulting in cross-site scripting (XSS)....	Static analysis (opengrep)
medium	`opengrep/javascript.lang.security.audit.detect-redos`	src/transcript.ts:548	Detected the use of a regular expression `^\s(?:[-_]\s*){3,}$` which appears to be vulnerable to a Regular expression Denial-of-Service (ReDoS). For this reason, it is recommended to review the regex and ensure it is not vulnerable to...	Static analysis (opengrep)
medium	`opengrep/javascript.lang.security.html-in-template-string`	src/transcript.ts:598	This template literal looks like HTML and has interpolated variables. These variables are not HTML-encoded by default. If the variables contain HTML tags, these may be interpreted by the browser, resulting in cross-site scripting (XSS)....	Static analysis (opengrep)
medium	`opengrep/javascript.lang.security.html-in-template-string`	src/transcript.ts:624	This template literal looks like HTML and has interpolated variables. These variables are not HTML-encoded by default. If the variables contain HTML tags, these may be interpreted by the browser, resulting in cross-site scripting (XSS)....	Static analysis (opengrep)
medium	`opengrep/javascript.lang.security.html-in-template-string`	src/transcript.ts:63	This template literal looks like HTML and has interpolated variables. These variables are not HTML-encoded by default. If the variables contain HTML tags, these may be interpreted by the browser, resulting in cross-site scripting (XSS)....	Static analysis (opengrep)
medium	`opengrep/javascript.lang.security.html-in-template-string`	src/transcript.ts:643	This template literal looks like HTML and has interpolated variables. These variables are not HTML-encoded by default. If the variables contain HTML tags, these may be interpreted by the browser, resulting in cross-site scripting (XSS)....	Static analysis (opengrep)
medium	`opengrep/javascript.lang.security.html-in-template-string`	src/transcript.ts:644	This template literal looks like HTML and has interpolated variables. These variables are not HTML-encoded by default. If the variables contain HTML tags, these may be interpreted by the browser, resulting in cross-site scripting (XSS)....	Static analysis (opengrep)
low	`opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.useless-assignment`	src/main.ts:4420	`input.style.height` is assigned twice; the first assignment is useless	Lint
low	`zizmor/self-repository`	.github/workflows/android-release.yml:19	use GitHub's dedicated self-repository syntax [confidence high]	CI workflows (zizmor)
low	`osv/GHSA-9jrq-w75r-8gcw`	package-lock.json	[email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-9jrq-w75r-8gcw	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
low	`osv/GHSA-662x-8wvj-2276`	src-tauri/Cargo.lock	[email protected] (crates.io) is affected by GHSA-662x-8wvj-2276	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
low	`osv/GHSA-9264-jvgf-6w2f`	src-tauri/Cargo.lock	[email protected] (crates.io) is affected by GHSA-9264-jvgf-6w2f	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
low	`osv/GHSA-9wfm-jcj8-jfv9`	src-tauri/Cargo.lock	[email protected] (crates.io) is affected by GHSA-9wfm-jcj8-jfv9	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
low	`osv/GHSA-g6xm-f9xp-qq35`	src-tauri/Cargo.lock	[email protected] (crates.io) is affected by GHSA-g6xm-f9xp-qq35	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
low	`osv/GHSA-j7h2-66j4-ghjf`	src-tauri/Cargo.lock	[email protected] (crates.io) is affected by GHSA-j7h2-66j4-ghjf	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
low	`osv/GHSA-p8qx-h547-fjw9`	src-tauri/Cargo.lock	[email protected] (crates.io) is affected by GHSA-p8qx-h547-fjw9	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
low	`opengrep/rust.lang.security.temp-dir`	src-tauri/src/download.rs:351	temp_dir should not be used for security operations. From the docs: 'The temporary directory may be shared among users, or between processes with different privileges; thus, the creation of any files or directories in the temporary...	Static analysis (opengrep)
low	`opengrep/rust.lang.security.temp-dir`	src-tauri/src/download.rs:374	temp_dir should not be used for security operations. From the docs: 'The temporary directory may be shared among users, or between processes with different privileges; thus, the creation of any files or directories in the temporary...	Static analysis (opengrep)
low	`opengrep/rust.lang.security.temp-dir`	src-tauri/src/download.rs:391	temp_dir should not be used for security operations. From the docs: 'The temporary directory may be shared among users, or between processes with different privileges; thus, the creation of any files or directories in the temporary...	Static analysis (opengrep)
low	`opengrep/rust.lang.security.current-exe`	src-tauri/src/store.rs:136	current_exe should not be used for security operations. From the docs: "The output of this function should not be trusted for anything that might have security implications. Basically, if users can run the executable, they can change...	Static analysis (opengrep)
low	`opengrep/rust.lang.security.temp-dir`	src-tauri/src/store.rs:221	temp_dir should not be used for security operations. From the docs: 'The temporary directory may be shared among users, or between processes with different privileges; thus, the creation of any files or directories in the temporary...	Static analysis (opengrep)
low	`opengrep/rust.lang.security.unsafe-usage`	src-tauri/src/watch.rs:392	Detected 'unsafe' usage, please audit for secure usage [confidence high]	Static analysis (opengrep)
low	`opengrep/rust.lang.security.unsafe-usage`	src-tauri/src/watch.rs:394	Detected 'unsafe' usage, please audit for secure usage [confidence high]	Static analysis (opengrep)
low	`opengrep/rust.lang.security.unsafe-usage`	src-tauri/src/watch.rs:420	Detected 'unsafe' usage, please audit for secure usage [confidence high]	Static analysis (opengrep)
low	`opengrep/rust.lang.security.unsafe-usage`	src-tauri/src/watch.rs:422	Detected 'unsafe' usage, please audit for secure usage [confidence high]	Static analysis (opengrep)
low	`gitleaks/private-key`	src-tauri/tests/remote_session.rs:38	Possible private-key secret in the current tree (test/docs/example file)	Secrets (gitleaks)

Tools and coverage

Every analyzer that ran on this commit. A failed or skipped tool is a coverage gap: its share of the score is left out and the coverage figure drops.

Analyzer	Pillar	Status	Version	Findings	Note
AI tool configuration	AI provenance	ok	`signatures-v1`	0
Explicit AI attribution	AI provenance	ok	`signatures-v1`	0
Release velocity	AI provenance	ok	`prov-4`	0
Coding style	AI provenance	ok	`—`	0
Commit velocity	AI provenance	ok	`prov-4`	0
Findings in AI-written lines	AI provenance	ok	`git-blame`	0
Complexity (lizard)	Code quality	ok	`lizard 1.25.1`	0
Documentation	Code quality	ok	`—`	0
Duplication (jscpd)	Code quality	ok	`repotrust-dup-w6`	0
Lint	Code quality	ok	`opengrep 1.33.1; rules f1d2b562b414`	11
Tests and CI	Code quality	ok	`—`	0
Type safety	Code quality	ok	`—`	0
CI workflows (zizmor)	Security	ok	`zizmor 1.32.0`	34
Dependencies (osv-scanner)	Security	ok	`osv-scanner version: 2.7.1`	35
Release downloads	Security	ok	`—`	0
Security posture	Security	ok	`—`	0
Package registries	Security	ok	`—`	0
Static analysis (opengrep)	Security	ok	`opengrep 1.33.1; rules f1d2b562b414`	41
OpenSSF Scorecard	Security	skipped	`—`	0	no published OpenSSF Scorecard result for this repo
Secrets (gitleaks)	Security	ok	`gitleaks 8.30.1`	1

Score history

Scores from different scoring versions aren't directly comparable.

Scored	Commit	Scoring	AI provenance	Quality	Security
2026-11-14	`bbb339979aee`	`prov-5+qual-2+sec-2`	10%	77	52
2026-11-14	`bbb339979aee`	`prov-4+qual-2+sec-2`	10%	77	52

Embed a badge

Maintainers can show these in a README. Badges update when the repository is re-scored.

[![RepoTrust ai](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/badge/github.com/simon141/pabloagent/ai.svg)](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/r/github.com/simon141/pabloagent/)

[![RepoTrust quality](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/badge/github.com/simon141/pabloagent/quality.svg)](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/r/github.com/simon141/pabloagent/)

[![RepoTrust security](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/badge/github.com/simon141/pabloagent/security.svg)](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/r/github.com/simon141/pabloagent/)

Full text report

Repository: https://github.com/simon141/pabloagent
Commit: bbb339979aee6d5aca62d9c0139186afd928a206
Generated: 2026-11-14T14:52:07+00:00
Scorer 0.1.0, scoring prov-5+qual-2+sec-2, report schema v2

Scores

Pillar	Score	Signal	Confidence	Coverage
AI provenance (estimated AI-generated share)	10	explicit	95%	100%
Code quality	77	adequate	90%	100%
Security	52	weak	85%	100%

AI provenance

Explicit AI attribution on 10% of first-party code added; an estimated 10% including velocity signals.

Explicitly attributed share (lower bound): 9.7%
Unattributed share in AI-consistent velocity bursts: 0.0%
Estimated AI-generated share: 9.7%

AI tool	Attributed commits	Lines added
Claude Code	45	2,580

AI tooling configured in repo: claude-code, generic-agent

Current source lines last changed by AI-attributed commits: 1,826 of 21,372.

Findings per 1,000 lines	AI-attributed	Other	Ratio
Quality	0.0	0.563	0.0x
Security	0.548	2.046	0.27x

Stylometry index: 0.30 per 1,000 lines (narrated steps 0, placeholders 0, assistant phrasing 0, emoji 13). Reported as a signal, not scored.

Month	Lines added	Attributed to AI
2026-08	22,650	1%
2026-09	3,642	53%
2026-10	412	100%

Evidence

Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (bbb339979aee)
Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (2a3bddab5a9c)
Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (b14fc3ed5931)
Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (009a3c3903e6)
Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (2f39781fefc9)
Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (d30ca6e79cf4)
Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (0e25384e2067)
Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (c215348cbe99)
Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (e9ae4e15e532)
Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (5d406bafdee0)
Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (24085ca38315)
Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (ee6e2bf6b491)
Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (d9bd66113e04)
Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (aff46bf23c41)
Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (a069d93c384a)

AI provenance describes how code was produced; it is not a quality judgment. Unless attribution is explicit, these are signals consistent with AI generation, not proof. Squash/rebase workflows, imported code, and rewritten history reduce accuracy.

Code quality

Code quality is adequate: test-to-source ratio 0.18, CI runs tests; 16% of function code in complex or long functions; 3% duplicated lines. Weakest area: complexity.

Area	Score
Complexity (lizard)	62
Duplication	83
Code smells (Opengrep)	89
Tests and CI	79
Documentation	65
Type safety	100
Process (Scorecard review/maintenance)	n/a

Functions: 1,221; mean complexity 3.2, 90th percentile 7; 31 complex and 7 long functions
Duplicated lines: 3.1% of 16,426 compared
Tests: 3,759 test lines for 21,372 source lines (ratio 0.18); CI test commands: go test, cargo test; 13% of recent source commits also change tests
Docs missing or thin: contributing, changelog

Most complex functions:

Security

Security posture is weak: 35 known vulnerabilities in 18 dependencies; 8 high-severity SAST findings; 33 high-severity workflow issues. Weakest area: posture.

Area	Score
Secrets (gitleaks, tree + history)	97
Static analysis (Opengrep)	79
Vulnerable dependencies (OSV)	32
CI workflows (zizmor)	0
Posture (policy, updates, signing, lockfiles)	0
OpenSSF Scorecard	n/a

Known vulnerabilities: 35 in 18 packages (critical 0, high 4, medium 11, low 7)
Posture checks passed: lockfiles; missing: security policy, dependency updates, signed commits

Top findings

Severity	Finding	Location
high	`opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-document-method`: User controlled data in methods like `innerHTML`, `outerHTML` or `document.write` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low]	src/main.ts:1538
high	`opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-innerhtml`: User controlled data in a `el.innerHTML` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low]	src/main.ts:1538
high	`opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-document-method`: User controlled data in methods like `innerHTML`, `outerHTML` or `document.write` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low]	src/main.ts:3292
high	`opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-innerhtml`: User controlled data in a `model.innerHTML` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low]	src/main.ts:3292
high	`opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-document-method`: User controlled data in methods like `innerHTML`, `outerHTML` or `document.write` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low]	src/transcript.ts:642
high	`opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-innerhtml`: User controlled data in a `el.innerHTML` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low]	src/transcript.ts:642
high	`opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-document-method`: User controlled data in methods like `innerHTML`, `outerHTML` or `document.write` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low]	src/transcript.ts:1742
high	`opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-innerhtml`: User controlled data in a `body.innerHTML` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low]	src/transcript.ts:1742
high	`osv/GHSA-68fv-2mgg-jv7q`: [email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-68fv-2mgg-jv7q	package-lock.json
high	`osv/GHSA-587h-7wmj-h5pm`: [email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-587h-7wmj-h5pm	package-lock.json
high	`osv/GHSA-47hw-gvq5-r2gm`: [email protected] (crates.io) is affected by RUSTSEC-2026-0492, GHSA-47hw-gvq5-r2gm	src-tauri/Cargo.lock
high	`osv/GHSA-vp5q-ff62-jwqv`: [email protected] (crates.io) is affected by RUSTSEC-2026-0495, GHSA-vp5q-ff62-jwqv	src-tauri/Cargo.lock
high	`zizmor/unpinned-uses`: unpinned action reference [confidence high]	.github/workflows/android-release.yml:26
high	`zizmor/unpinned-uses`: unpinned action reference [confidence high]	.github/workflows/android-release.yml:30
high	`zizmor/unpinned-uses`: unpinned action reference [confidence high]	.github/workflows/android-release.yml:35
high	`zizmor/unpinned-uses`: unpinned action reference [confidence high]	.github/workflows/android-release.yml:45
high	`zizmor/unpinned-uses`: unpinned action reference [confidence high]	.github/workflows/android-release.yml:92
high	`zizmor/unpinned-uses`: unpinned action reference [confidence high]	.github/workflows/android-release.yml:119
high	`zizmor/unpinned-uses`: unpinned action reference [confidence high]	.github/workflows/android-release.yml:123
high	`zizmor/unpinned-uses`: unpinned action reference [confidence high]	.github/workflows/android-release.yml:131
high	`zizmor/unpinned-uses`: unpinned action reference [confidence high]	.github/workflows/android-release.yml:181
high	`zizmor/unpinned-uses`: unpinned action reference [confidence high]	.github/workflows/android-release.yml:197
high	`zizmor/unpinned-uses`: unpinned action reference [confidence high]	.github/workflows/android-release.yml:201
high	`zizmor/unpinned-uses`: unpinned action reference [confidence high]	.github/workflows/android-release.yml:211
high	`zizmor/unpinned-uses`: unpinned action reference [confidence high]	.github/workflows/android-release.yml:257

Static signals only: the scorer never runs the project's code. Secret findings are pattern matches that were not verified, and secret values are never stored.

Distribution signals

binary-release-asset: release continuous ships pabloagent-android-arm64.apk (0 downloads)
binary-release-asset: release continuous ships pabloagent-linux-aarch64.AppImage (0 downloads)
binary-release-asset: release continuous ships pabloagent-linux-aarch64.deb (0 downloads)
binary-release-asset: release continuous ships pabloagent-linux-aarch64.rpm (0 downloads)
binary-release-asset: release continuous ships pabloagent-linux-x86_64.AppImage (0 downloads)
readme-download-lure: links directly to a downloadable archive or installer

Signals consistent with a repository that exists to distribute a download. They are heuristics, not a verdict; release files were not downloaded or inspected.

Repository profile

Source lines: 21,372; test lines: 3,759

Language	Lines
TypeScript	11,205
Rust	10,706
JavaScript	1,606
Shell	872
Kotlin	742