Leaderboard github.com
shadowsocksr-backup/shadowsocksr-csharp
AI provenance
0%
none-detected
- Confidence
- 65%
- Coverage
- 100%
Estimated share of AI-generated code. Explicit attribution is a lower bound.
Code quality
55/100
weak
- Confidence
- 90%
- Coverage
- 100%
Complexity, duplication, lint density, tests, CI, docs and review process.
Security
80/100
adequate
- Confidence
- 85%
- Coverage
- 100%
Secrets, static analysis, vulnerable dependencies, CI and supply-chain posture.
AI provenance
0% none-detected
No AI attribution or AI-consistent velocity signals detected.
How the score is built
- Explicitly attributed share0%
- Unattributed share in AI-pace bursts0%
- Estimated AI-generated share0%
- AI tool configuration files0
- Work sessions at AI pace0
- Releases at AI pace0
- Coding-style index (1.0+ means possible)0.13
Lines added per month all AI-attributed share
- 2013-011,302 · 0% AI
- 2013-030 · 0% AI
- 2013-05249 · 0% AI
- 2013-06239 · 0% AI
- 2014-09421 · 0% AI
- 2014-119,042 · 0% AI
- 2014-126,082 · 0% AI
- 2015-0114,819 · 0% AI
- 2015-0220 · 0% AI
- 2015-03498 · 0% AI
- 2015-040 · 0% AI
- 2015-060 · 0% AI
- 2015-07459 · 0% AI
- 2015-087,498 · 0% AI
- 2015-091,699 · 0% AI
- 2015-101,815 · 0% AI
- 2015-111,858 · 0% AI
- 2015-121,630 · 0% AI
- 2016-011,787 · 0% AI
- 2016-0251 · 0% AI
- 2016-03620 · 0% AI
- 2016-041,234 · 0% AI
- 2016-051,227 · 0% AI
- 2016-061,865 · 0% AI
- 2016-084,472 · 0% AI
- 2016-092,525 · 0% AI
- 2016-102,599 · 0% AI
- 2016-123,465 · 0% AI
- 2017-011,387 · 0% AI
- 2017-02709 · 0% AI
- 2017-03684 · 0% AI
- 2017-041,293 · 0% AI
- 2017-051,135 · 0% AI
- 2017-061,914 · 0% AI
- 2017-07294 · 0% AI
Evidence by analyzer
Explicit AI attributionok
- attributed_commit_share
- 0.0%
- attributed_commits
- 0
- attributed_loc
- 0
- attributed_loc_share
- 0.0%
- commits
- 702
- effective_loc
- 74,892
- tools_detected
- 0
AI tool configurationok
- artifacts
- 0
- tools_configured
- 0
- workflow_agents
- 0
Commit velocityok
- excluded_import_loc
- 7,418
- flagged_loc
- 0
- flagged_loc_share
- 0.0%
- flagged_units
- 0
- max_loc_per_hour
- 1,765.67
- measured_loc
- 67,474
- median_loc_per_hour
- 75
- pr_timed_units
- 0
- pre_ai_era_burst_loc
- 20,586
- pre_ai_era_bursts
- 7
- pre_ai_era_measured_loc
- 67,474
- work_units
- 324
Release velocityok
- flagged_releases
- 0
- max_loc_per_day
- 3,587.20
- releases
- 79
Coding styleok5 items
- step-by-step narration comment: // First, read remainder from current byte
- step-by-step narration comment: // Step 1. Divide data bytes into blocks and generate error correction bytes for them. We'll
- step-by-step narration comment: // First, place data blocks.
- step-by-step narration comment: // Then, place error correction blocks.
- step-by-step narration comment: // Then, embed the dark dot at the left bottom corner.
- count:assistant_voice
- 0
- count:emoji_in_code
- 0
- count:narrated_steps
- 5
- count:placeholder
- 0
- files:assistant_voice
- 0
- files:emoji_in_code
- 0
- files:narrated_steps
- 3
- files:placeholder
- 0
- index
- 0.13
- lines_scanned
- 39,296
- per_kloc:assistant_voice
- 0
- per_kloc:emoji_in_code
- 0
- per_kloc:narrated_steps
- 0.13
- per_kloc:placeholder
- 0
Code quality
55 weak
Code quality is weak: test-to-source ratio 0.01, no CI test run detected; 26% of function code in complex or long functions; 12% duplicated lines. Weakest area: testing.
How the score is built
- Complexity45
- Duplication49
- Lint and smells99
- Tests and CI20
- Documentation100
- Type safetynot measured
- Review processnot measured
Evidence by analyzer
Complexity (lizard)ok10 items
- PocoJsonSerializerStrategy::BuildMap in shadowsocks-csharp/3rd/SimpleJson.cs: complexity 138, 492 lines
- ServerLogForm::RefreshLog in shadowsocks-csharp/View/ServerLogForm.cs: complexity 72, 328 lines
- StringUtils::guessEncoding in shadowsocks-csharp/3rd/zxing/common/StringUtils.cs: complexity 58, 176 lines
- ServerSelectStrategy::SubSelect in shadowsocks-csharp/Model/ServerSelectStrategy.cs: complexity 56, 188 lines
- Socks5Forwarder::IsHandle in shadowsocks-csharp/Controller/Socks5Forwarder.cs: complexity 42, 147 lines
- MenuViewController::updateFreeNodeChecker_NewFreeNodeFound in shadowsocks-csharp/View/MenuViewController.cs: complexity 41, 210 lines
- SimpleJson::NextToken in shadowsocks-csharp/3rd/SimpleJson.cs: complexity 36, 74 lines
- ProtocolResponseDetector::OnSend in shadowsocks-csharp/Controller/SpeedTest.cs: complexity 36, 34 lines
- FinderPatternFinder::crossCheckDiagonal in shadowsocks-csharp/3rd/zxing/qrcode/detector/FinderPatternFinder.cs: complexity 35, 65 lines
- Handler::LogSocketException in shadowsocks-csharp/Controller/Local.cs: complexity 34, 117 lines
- complex_functions
- 41
- function_nloc
- 25,843
- functions
- 1,325
- long_functions
- 26
- many_param_functions
- 7
- mean_ccn
- 3.73
- p90_ccn
- 8
- risky_nloc_share
- 26.3%
Duplication (jscpd)ok10 items
- 6+ duplicated lines: shadowsocks-csharp/3rd/SimpleJson.cs:70 and shadowsocks-csharp/3rd/SimpleJson.cs:107
- 6+ duplicated lines: shadowsocks-csharp/3rd/opendns/DnsQuery.cs:2 and shadowsocks-csharp/3rd/opendns/DnsResponse.cs:2
- 6+ duplicated lines: shadowsocks-csharp/3rd/opendns/DnsResponse.cs:5 and shadowsocks-csharp/3rd/opendns/Enum.cs:5
- 6+ duplicated lines: shadowsocks-csharp/3rd/zxing/BarcodeFormat.cs:2 and shadowsocks-csharp/3rd/zxing/DecodeHintType.cs:2
- 6+ duplicated lines: shadowsocks-csharp/3rd/zxing/BarcodeFormat.cs:4 and shadowsocks-csharp/3rd/zxing/BaseLuminanceSource.cs:4
- 6+ duplicated lines: shadowsocks-csharp/3rd/zxing/BaseLuminanceSource.cs:2 and shadowsocks-csharp/3rd/zxing/BitmapLuminanceSource.cs:2
- 6+ duplicated lines: shadowsocks-csharp/3rd/zxing/Binarizer.cs:2 and shadowsocks-csharp/3rd/zxing/BinaryBitmap.cs:2
- 6+ duplicated lines: shadowsocks-csharp/3rd/zxing/BinaryBitmap.cs:127 and shadowsocks-csharp/3rd/zxing/LuminanceSource.cs:111
- 6+ duplicated lines: shadowsocks-csharp/3rd/zxing/BinaryBitmap.cs:174 and shadowsocks-csharp/3rd/zxing/Result.cs:146
- 6+ duplicated lines: shadowsocks-csharp/3rd/zxing/BitmapLuminanceSource.cs:157 and shadowsocks-csharp/3rd/zxing/BitmapLuminanceSource.cs:171
- compared_lines
- 24,279
- duplicated_lines
- 2,867
- duplicated_share
- 11.8%
- files
- 136
Lintok
- category:best-practice
- 3
- category:correctness
- 2
- findings
- 5
- scanned_lines
- 39,296
- weighted_findings
- 1.25
Tests and CIok
- check:ci_present
- no
- check:ci_runs_lint
- no
- check:ci_runs_tests
- no
- check:has_tests
- yes
- check:test_ratio
- no
- check:tests_cochange
- no
- ci_files
- 0
- cochange_commits
- 284
- cochange_share
- 0.4%
- source_lines
- 39,296
- test_lines
- 215
- test_ratio
- 0.01
Documentationok4 items
- README.md
README.md - LICENSE
LICENSE - CONTRIBUTING.md
CONTRIBUTING.md - CHANGES
CHANGES
- check:changelog
- yes
- check:contributing
- yes
- check:license
- yes
- check:readme
- yes
- readme_lines
- 50
Type safetyskipped
Security
80 adequate
Security posture is adequate: no high-impact findings. Weakest area: posture.
How the score is built
- Secrets97
- Static analysis (SAST)100
- Vulnerable dependenciesnot measured
- CI workflowsnot measured
- Security posture0
- OpenSSF Scorecardnot measured
Evidence by analyzer
OpenSSF Scorecardskipped
no published OpenSSF Scorecard result for this repo
Package registriesskipped
no registry dependencies declared
Secrets (gitleaks)ok
- secrets_current
- 0
- secrets_history
- 0
- secrets_low_confidence
- 1
- secrets_nonprod
- 0
Static analysis (opengrep)ok
- findings
- 0
- findings_high
- 0
- findings_low
- 0
- findings_medium
- 0
- parse_errors
- 3
- scanned_lines
- 39,296
- weighted_findings
- 0
Dependencies (osv-scanner)skipped
CI workflows (zizmor)skipped
Security postureok
- check:dependency_updates
- no
- check:lockfiles
- yes
- check:security_policy
- no
- check:signed_commits
- no
- signed_commit_share
- 0.0%
- unpinned_manifests
- 0
Release downloadsok1 item
- binary_assets
- 1
- signals
- 1
- suspicious
- 0
Findings
6 low
6 findings
| Severity | Rule | Location | Message | Tool |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| low | opengrep/bash.lang.correctness.unquoted-variable-expansion-in-command |
packaging/upload.sh:5 | Variable expansions must be double-quoted so as to prevent being split into multiple pieces according to whitespace or whichever separator is specified by the IFS variable. If you really wish to split the variable's contents, you may... | Lint |
| low | opengrep/bash.lang.correctness.unquoted-variable-expansion-in-command |
packaging/upload.sh:6 | Variable expansions must be double-quoted so as to prevent being split into multiple pieces according to whitespace or whichever separator is specified by the IFS variable. If you really wish to split the variable's contents, you may... | Lint |
| low | opengrep/csharp.lang.best-practice.structured-logging |
shadowsocks-csharp/Controller/Local.cs:754 | String interpolation in log message obscures the distinction between variables and the log message. Use structured logging instead, where the variables are passed as additional arguments and the interpolation is performed by the logging... | Lint |
| low | opengrep/csharp.lang.best-practice.structured-logging |
shadowsocks-csharp/Controller/Local.cs:757 | String interpolation in log message obscures the distinction between variables and the log message. Use structured logging instead, where the variables are passed as additional arguments and the interpolation is performed by the logging... | Lint |
| low | opengrep/csharp.lang.best-practice.structured-logging |
shadowsocks-csharp/Controller/Local.cs:838 | String interpolation in log message obscures the distinction between variables and the log message. Use structured logging instead, where the variables are passed as additional arguments and the interpolation is performed by the logging... | Lint |
| low | gitleaks/generic-api-key |
shadowsocks-csharp/View/HotkeySettingsForm.cs:119 | Possible generic-api-key secret in history (commit 99bdec334c); removed from the current tree but still retrievable | Secrets (gitleaks) |
Tools and coverage
Every analyzer that ran on this commit. A failed or skipped tool is a coverage gap: its share of the score is left out and the coverage figure drops.
| Analyzer | Pillar | Status | Version | Findings | Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI tool configuration | AI provenance | ok | signatures-v1 | 0 | |
| Explicit AI attribution | AI provenance | ok | signatures-v1 | 0 | |
| Release velocity | AI provenance | ok | prov-4 | 0 | |
| Coding style | AI provenance | ok | — | 0 | |
| Commit velocity | AI provenance | ok | prov-4 | 0 | |
| Complexity (lizard) | Code quality | ok | lizard 1.25.1 | 0 | |
| Documentation | Code quality | ok | — | 0 | |
| Duplication (jscpd) | Code quality | ok | repotrust-dup-w6 | 0 | |
| Lint | Code quality | ok | opengrep 1.33.1; rules f1d2b562b414 | 5 | |
| Tests and CI | Code quality | ok | — | 0 | |
| Type safety | Code quality | skipped | — | 0 | |
| CI workflows (zizmor) | Security | skipped | — | 0 | |
| Dependencies (osv-scanner) | Security | skipped | — | 0 | |
| Release downloads | Security | ok | — | 0 | |
| Security posture | Security | ok | — | 0 | |
| Package registries | Security | skipped | — | 0 | no registry dependencies declared |
| Static analysis (opengrep) | Security | ok | opengrep 1.33.1; rules f1d2b562b414 | 0 | |
| OpenSSF Scorecard | Security | skipped | — | 0 | no published OpenSSF Scorecard result for this repo |
| Secrets (gitleaks) | Security | ok | gitleaks 8.30.1 | 1 |
Score history
Scores from different scoring versions aren't directly comparable.
| Scored | Commit | Scoring | AI provenance | Quality | Security |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-11-14 | 932b86ef5783 | prov-5+qual-2+sec-2 | 0% | 55 | 80 |
| 2026-11-14 | 932b86ef5783 | prov-4+qual-2+sec-2 | 0% | 55 | 80 |
Full text report
- Repository: https://github.com/shadowsocksr-backup/shadowsocksr-csharp
- Commit:
932b86ef57836bdb20fa96d88823174b5ecced60 - Generated: 2026-11-14T14:52:07+00:00
- Scorer 0.1.0, scoring prov-5+qual-2+sec-2, report schema v2
Scores
| Pillar | Score | Signal | Confidence | Coverage |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI provenance (estimated AI-generated share) | 0 | none-detected | 65% | 100% |
| Code quality | 55 | weak | 90% | 100% |
| Security | 80 | adequate | 85% | 100% |
AI provenance
No AI attribution or AI-consistent velocity signals detected.
-
Explicitly attributed share (lower bound): 0.0%
-
Unattributed share in AI-consistent velocity bursts: 0.0%
-
Estimated AI-generated share: 0.0%
-
Stylometry index: 0.13 per 1,000 lines (narrated steps 5, placeholders 0, assistant phrasing 0, emoji 0). Reported as a signal, not scored.
| Month | Lines added | Attributed to AI |
|---|---|---|
| 2016-06 | 1,865 | 0% |
| 2016-08 | 4,472 | 0% |
| 2016-09 | 2,525 | 0% |
| 2016-10 | 2,599 | 0% |
| 2016-12 | 3,465 | 0% |
| 2017-01 | 1,387 | 0% |
| 2017-02 | 709 | 0% |
| 2017-03 | 684 | 0% |
| 2017-04 | 1,293 | 0% |
| 2017-05 | 1,135 | 0% |
| 2017-06 | 1,914 | 0% |
| 2017-07 | 294 | 0% |
Evidence
- step-by-step narration comment: // First, read remainder from current byte (shadowsocks-)
- step-by-step narration comment: // Step 1. Divide data bytes into blocks and generate error correction bytes for them. We'll (shadowsocks-)
- step-by-step narration comment: // First, place data blocks. (shadowsocks-)
- step-by-step narration comment: // Then, place error correction blocks. (shadowsocks-)
- step-by-step narration comment: // Then, embed the dark dot at the left bottom corner. (shadowsocks-)
AI provenance describes how code was produced; it is not a quality judgment. Unless attribution is explicit, these are signals consistent with AI generation, not proof. Squash/rebase workflows, imported code, and rewritten history reduce accuracy.
Code quality
Code quality is weak: test-to-source ratio 0.01, no CI test run detected; 26% of function code in complex or long functions; 12% duplicated lines. Weakest area: testing.
| Area | Score |
|---|---|
| Complexity (lizard) | 45 |
| Duplication | 49 |
| Code smells (Opengrep) | 99 |
| Tests and CI | 20 |
| Documentation | 100 |
| Type safety | n/a |
| Process (Scorecard review/maintenance) | n/a |
- Functions: 1,325; mean complexity 3.7, 90th percentile 8; 41 complex and 26 long functions
- Duplicated lines: 11.8% of 24,279 compared
- Tests: 215 test lines for 39,296 source lines (ratio 0.01); CI test commands: none detected; 0% of recent source commits also change tests
- Docs missing or thin: none
Most complex functions:
- PocoJsonSerializerStrategy::BuildMap in shadowsocks-csharp/3rd/SimpleJson.cs: complexity 138, 492 lines
- ServerLogForm::RefreshLog in shadowsocks-csharp/View/ServerLogForm.cs: complexity 72, 328 lines
- StringUtils::guessEncoding in shadowsocks-csharp/3rd/zxing/common/StringUtils.cs: complexity 58, 176 lines
- ServerSelectStrategy::SubSelect in shadowsocks-csharp/Model/ServerSelectStrategy.cs: complexity 56, 188 lines
- Socks5Forwarder::IsHandle in shadowsocks-csharp/Controller/Socks5Forwarder.cs: complexity 42, 147 lines
Security
Security posture is adequate: no high-impact findings. Weakest area: posture.
| Area | Score |
|---|---|
| Secrets (gitleaks, tree + history) | 97 |
| Static analysis (Opengrep) | 100 |
| Vulnerable dependencies (OSV) | n/a |
| CI workflows (zizmor) | n/a |
| Posture (policy, updates, signing, lockfiles) | 0 |
| OpenSSF Scorecard | n/a |
- Posture checks passed: lockfiles; missing: security policy, dependency updates, signed commits
Top findings
| Severity | Finding | Location |
|---|---|---|
| low | gitleaks/generic-api-key: Possible generic-api-key secret in history (commit 99bdec334c); removed from the current tree but still retrievable |
shadowsocks-csharp/View/HotkeySettingsForm.cs:119 |
Static signals only: the scorer never runs the project's code. Secret findings are pattern matches that were not verified, and secret values are never stored.
Distribution signals
- binary-release-asset: release 4.7.0 ships ShadowsocksR-4.7.0-win.7z (920250 downloads)
Signals consistent with a repository that exists to distribute a download. They are heuristics, not a verdict; release files were not downloaded or inspected.
Repository profile
- Source lines: 39,296; test lines: 215
| Language | Lines |
|---|---|
| C# | 39,505 |
| Shell | 6 |