Leaderboard github.com
samuelcolvin/spread
Spreadsheet viewer, in Rust using GPUI
AI provenance
0%
possible
- Confidence
- 52%
- Coverage
- 100%
Estimated share of AI-generated code. Explicit attribution is a lower bound.
Code quality
60/100
weak
- Confidence
- 90%
- Coverage
- 100%
Complexity, duplication, lint density, tests, CI, docs and review process.
Security
70/100
adequate
- Confidence
- 85%
- Coverage
- 100%
Secrets, static analysis, vulnerable dependencies, CI and supply-chain posture.
AI provenance
0% possible
Weak signals consistent with AI-assisted development.
How the score is built
- Explicitly attributed share0%
- Unattributed share in AI-pace bursts0%
- Estimated AI-generated share0%
- AI tool configuration files2
- Work sessions at AI pace0
- Releases at AI pacenot measured
- Coding-style index (1.0+ means possible)0.00
Lines added per month all AI-attributed share
- 2026-0512,508 · 0% AI
- 2026-061,078 · 0% AI
Evidence by analyzer
Explicit AI attributionok
- attributed_commit_share
- 0.0%
- attributed_commits
- 0
- attributed_loc
- 0
- attributed_loc_share
- 0.0%
- commits
- 46
- effective_loc
- 13,586
- tools_detected
- 0
AI tool configurationok2 items
- artifacts
- 2
- earliest_adoption
- 2026-05-09
- tools_configured
- 2
- workflow_agents
- 0
Commit velocityok
- excluded_import_loc
- 2,090
- flagged_loc
- 0
- flagged_loc_share
- 0.0%
- flagged_units
- 0
- max_loc_per_hour
- 359.15
- measured_loc
- 11,496
- median_loc_per_hour
- 131.51
- pr_timed_units
- 0
- pre_ai_era_burst_loc
- 0
- pre_ai_era_bursts
- 0
- pre_ai_era_measured_loc
- 0
- work_units
- 21
Release velocityskipped
Coding styleok
- count:assistant_voice
- 0
- count:emoji_in_code
- 0
- count:narrated_steps
- 0
- count:placeholder
- 0
- files:assistant_voice
- 0
- files:emoji_in_code
- 0
- files:narrated_steps
- 0
- files:placeholder
- 0
- index
- 0
- lines_scanned
- 11,663
- per_kloc:assistant_voice
- 0
- per_kloc:emoji_in_code
- 0
- per_kloc:narrated_steps
- 0
- per_kloc:placeholder
- 0
Code quality
60 weak
Code quality is weak: test-to-source ratio 0.00, CI runs tests; 16% of function code in complex or long functions; 9% duplicated lines. Weakest area: type safety.
How the score is built
- Complexity62
- Duplication59
- Lint and smells100
- Tests and CI45
- Documentation65
- Type safety0
- Review processnot measured
Evidence by analyzer
Complexity (lizard)ok10 items
- read_styles in src/sources/xlsx.rs: complexity 97, 180 lines
- read_sheet_metadata in src/sources/xlsx.rs: complexity 41, 90 lines
- run in src/main.rs: complexity 39, 208 lines
- parse_date_section in src/workbook.rs: complexity 30, 112 lines
- render_date_field in src/workbook.rs: complexity 25, 38 lines
- cell in src/view.rs: complexity 19, 94 lines
- parse_suffix in src/workbook.rs: complexity 18, 60 lines
- search_input_key_down in src/view.rs: complexity 16, 66 lines
- classify_section in src/workbook.rs: complexity 16, 46 lines
- render in src/view.rs: complexity 11, 214 lines
- complex_functions
- 9
- function_nloc
- 9,300
- functions
- 543
- long_functions
- 7
- many_param_functions
- 9
- mean_ccn
- 3.20
- p90_ccn
- 7
- risky_nloc_share
- 16.2%
Duplication (jscpd)ok7 items
- 6+ duplicated lines: src/main.rs:173 and src/main.rs:370
- 6+ duplicated lines: src/main.rs:905 and src/workbook.rs:930
- 6+ duplicated lines: src/sources/csv.rs:147 and src/sources/parquet.rs:216
- 6+ duplicated lines: src/sources/xlsx.rs:373 and src/sources/xlsx.rs:383
- 6+ duplicated lines: src/view.rs:1134 and src/view.rs:1161
- 6+ duplicated lines: src/view.rs:4354 and src/workbook.rs:2485
- 6+ duplicated lines: src/workbook.rs:305 and src/workbook.rs:324
- compared_lines
- 8,468
- duplicated_lines
- 744
- duplicated_share
- 8.8%
- files
- 10
Lintok
- findings
- 0
- scanned_lines
- 11,663
- weighted_findings
- 0
Tests and CIok3 items
- CI config: .github/workflows/ci.yml
.github/workflows/ci.yml - CI runs tests (make test)
- CI runs linters (clippy, rustfmt)
- check:ci_present
- yes
- check:ci_runs_lint
- yes
- check:ci_runs_tests
- yes
- check:has_tests
- no
- check:test_ratio
- no
- check:tests_cochange
- no
- ci_files
- 1
- cochange_commits
- 38
- cochange_share
- 0.0%
- source_lines
- 11,663
- test_lines
- 0
- test_ratio
- 0
Documentationok2 items
- README.md
README.md - LICENSE
LICENSE
- check:changelog
- no
- check:contributing
- no
- check:license
- yes
- check:readme
- yes
- readme_lines
- 66
Type safetyok
- check:low_escape_density
- no
- check:strict_config
- no
- escapes
- 7
- escapes_per_kloc
- 7
Security
70 adequate
Security posture is adequate: 64 known vulnerabilities in 35 dependencies. Weakest area: dependencies.
How the score is built
- Secrets100
- Static analysis (SAST)97
- Vulnerable dependencies9
- CI workflows100
- Security posture20
- OpenSSF Scorecardnot measured
Evidence by analyzer
OpenSSF Scorecardskipped
no published OpenSSF Scorecard result for this repo
Package registriesok
- checked
- 15
- declared
- 15
- lookup_errors
- 0
- missing
- 0
- recent
- 0
Secrets (gitleaks)ok
- secrets_current
- 0
- secrets_history
- 0
- secrets_low_confidence
- 0
- secrets_nonprod
- 0
Static analysis (opengrep)ok
- findings
- 4
- findings_high
- 0
- findings_low
- 4
- findings_medium
- 0
- parse_errors
- 2
- scanned_lines
- 11,663
- weighted_findings
- 1
Dependencies (osv-scanner)ok
- penalty
- 142
- vulnerabilities
- 64
- vulnerable_packages
- 35
- vulns_critical
- 2
- vulns_high
- 12
- vulns_low
- 2
- vulns_medium
- 4
- vulns_unknown
- 44
CI workflows (zizmor)ok
- findings
- 0
- findings_high
- 0
- findings_low
- 0
- findings_medium
- 0
- penalty
- 0
- workflows
- 1
Security postureok
- check:dependency_updates
- no
- check:lockfiles
- yes
- check:security_policy
- no
- check:signed_commits
- yes
- signed_commit_share
- 100.0%
- unpinned_manifests
- 0
Release downloadsok
- binary_assets
- 0
- signals
- 0
- suspicious
- 0
Findings
2 critical12 high48 medium6 low
68 findings
| Severity | Rule | Location | Message | Tool |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| critical | osv/GHSA-m665-v7pm-7grj |
Cargo.lock | [email protected] (crates.io) is affected by GHSA-m665-v7pm-7grj | Dependencies (osv-scanner) |
| critical | osv/RUSTSEC-2026-0369 |
Cargo.lock | [email protected] (crates.io) is affected by RUSTSEC-2026-0369 | Dependencies (osv-scanner) |
| high | osv/GHSA-2f9f-gq7v-9h6m |
Cargo.lock | [email protected] (crates.io) is affected by RUSTSEC-2026-0435, GHSA-2f9f-gq7v-9h6m | Dependencies (osv-scanner) |
| high | osv/GHSA-4w2j-m93h-cj5j |
Cargo.lock | [email protected] (crates.io) is affected by RUSTSEC-2026-0185, GHSA-4w2j-m93h-cj5j | Dependencies (osv-scanner) |
| high | osv/GHSA-9hj8-73fh-9963 |
Cargo.lock | [email protected] (crates.io) is affected by GHSA-9hj8-73fh-9963 | Dependencies (osv-scanner) |
| high | osv/GHSA-hjqx-j4rw-g7xv |
Cargo.lock | [email protected] (crates.io) is affected by GHSA-hjqx-j4rw-g7xv | Dependencies (osv-scanner) |
| high | osv/GHSA-q7v9-x93c-xqv3 |
Cargo.lock | [email protected] (crates.io) is affected by RUSTSEC-2026-0429, GHSA-q7v9-x93c-xqv3 | Dependencies (osv-scanner) |
| high | osv/RUSTSEC-2026-0194 |
Cargo.lock | [email protected] (crates.io) is affected by RUSTSEC-2026-0194 | Dependencies (osv-scanner) |
| high | osv/RUSTSEC-2026-0194 |
Cargo.lock | [email protected] (crates.io) is affected by RUSTSEC-2026-0194 | Dependencies (osv-scanner) |
| high | osv/RUSTSEC-2026-0195 |
Cargo.lock | [email protected] (crates.io) is affected by RUSTSEC-2026-0195 | Dependencies (osv-scanner) |
| high | osv/RUSTSEC-2026-0195 |
Cargo.lock | [email protected] (crates.io) is affected by RUSTSEC-2026-0195 | Dependencies (osv-scanner) |
| high | osv/RUSTSEC-2026-0340 |
Cargo.lock | [email protected] (crates.io) is affected by RUSTSEC-2026-0340 | Dependencies (osv-scanner) |
| high | osv/RUSTSEC-2026-0367 |
Cargo.lock | [email protected] (crates.io) is affected by RUSTSEC-2026-0367 | Dependencies (osv-scanner) |
| high | osv/RUSTSEC-2026-0436 |
Cargo.lock | [email protected] (crates.io) is affected by RUSTSEC-2026-0436 | Dependencies (osv-scanner) |
| medium | osv/GHSA-2mjx-qc3c-rqvc |
Cargo.lock | [email protected] (crates.io) is affected by RUSTSEC-2026-0285, GHSA-2mjx-qc3c-rqvc | Dependencies (osv-scanner) |
| medium | osv/GHSA-38c5-483c-4qqp |
Cargo.lock | [email protected] (crates.io) is affected by GHSA-38c5-483c-4qqp | Dependencies (osv-scanner) |
| medium | osv/GHSA-8hxf-qr8p-62x4 |
Cargo.lock | [email protected] (crates.io) is affected by GHSA-8hxf-qr8p-62x4 | Dependencies (osv-scanner) |
| medium | osv/GHSA-c8m5-c952-6cm4 |
Cargo.lock | [email protected] (crates.io) is affected by RUSTSEC-2026-0346, GHSA-c8m5-c952-6cm4 | Dependencies (osv-scanner) |
| medium | osv/RUSTSEC-2024-0384 |
Cargo.lock | [email protected] (crates.io) is affected by RUSTSEC-2024-0384 | Dependencies (osv-scanner) |
| medium | osv/RUSTSEC-2024-0436 |
Cargo.lock | [email protected] (crates.io) is affected by RUSTSEC-2024-0436 | Dependencies (osv-scanner) |
| medium | osv/RUSTSEC-2025-0052 |
Cargo.lock | [email protected] (crates.io) is affected by RUSTSEC-2025-0052 | Dependencies (osv-scanner) |
| medium | osv/RUSTSEC-2025-0134 |
Cargo.lock | [email protected] (crates.io) is affected by RUSTSEC-2025-0134 | Dependencies (osv-scanner) |
| medium | osv/RUSTSEC-2026-0173 |
Cargo.lock | [email protected] (crates.io) is affected by RUSTSEC-2026-0173 | Dependencies (osv-scanner) |
| medium | osv/RUSTSEC-2026-0186 |
Cargo.lock | [email protected] (crates.io) is affected by RUSTSEC-2026-0186 | Dependencies (osv-scanner) |
| medium | osv/RUSTSEC-2026-0190 |
Cargo.lock | [email protected] (crates.io) is affected by RUSTSEC-2026-0190 | Dependencies (osv-scanner) |
| medium | osv/RUSTSEC-2026-0192 |
Cargo.lock | [email protected] (crates.io) is affected by RUSTSEC-2026-0192 | Dependencies (osv-scanner) |
| medium | osv/RUSTSEC-2026-0192 |
Cargo.lock | [email protected] (crates.io) is affected by RUSTSEC-2026-0192 | Dependencies (osv-scanner) |
| medium | osv/RUSTSEC-2026-0192 |
Cargo.lock | [email protected] (crates.io) is affected by RUSTSEC-2026-0192 | Dependencies (osv-scanner) |
| medium | osv/RUSTSEC-2026-0204 |
Cargo.lock | [email protected] (crates.io) is affected by RUSTSEC-2026-0204 | Dependencies (osv-scanner) |
| medium | osv/RUSTSEC-2026-0206 |
Cargo.lock | [email protected] (crates.io) is affected by RUSTSEC-2026-0206 | Dependencies (osv-scanner) |
| medium | osv/RUSTSEC-2026-0206 |
Cargo.lock | [email protected] (crates.io) is affected by RUSTSEC-2026-0206 | Dependencies (osv-scanner) |
| medium | osv/RUSTSEC-2026-0221 |
Cargo.lock | [email protected] (crates.io) is affected by RUSTSEC-2026-0221 | Dependencies (osv-scanner) |
| medium | osv/RUSTSEC-2026-0258 |
Cargo.lock | [email protected] (crates.io) is affected by RUSTSEC-2026-0258 | Dependencies (osv-scanner) |
| medium | osv/RUSTSEC-2026-0338 |
Cargo.lock | [email protected] (crates.io) is affected by RUSTSEC-2026-0338 | Dependencies (osv-scanner) |
| medium | osv/RUSTSEC-2026-0339 |
Cargo.lock | [email protected] (crates.io) is affected by RUSTSEC-2026-0339 | Dependencies (osv-scanner) |
| medium | osv/RUSTSEC-2026-0342 |
Cargo.lock | [email protected] (crates.io) is affected by RUSTSEC-2026-0342 | Dependencies (osv-scanner) |
| medium | osv/RUSTSEC-2026-0368 |
Cargo.lock | [email protected] (crates.io) is affected by RUSTSEC-2026-0368 | Dependencies (osv-scanner) |
| medium | osv/RUSTSEC-2026-0370 |
Cargo.lock | [email protected] (crates.io) is affected by RUSTSEC-2026-0370 | Dependencies (osv-scanner) |
| medium | osv/RUSTSEC-2026-0371 |
Cargo.lock | [email protected] (crates.io) is affected by RUSTSEC-2026-0371 | Dependencies (osv-scanner) |
| medium | osv/RUSTSEC-2026-0372 |
Cargo.lock | [email protected] (crates.io) is affected by RUSTSEC-2026-0372 | Dependencies (osv-scanner) |
| medium | osv/RUSTSEC-2026-0382 |
Cargo.lock | [email protected] (crates.io) is affected by RUSTSEC-2026-0382 | Dependencies (osv-scanner) |
| medium | osv/RUSTSEC-2026-0386 |
Cargo.lock | [email protected] (crates.io) is affected by RUSTSEC-2026-0386 | Dependencies (osv-scanner) |
| medium | osv/RUSTSEC-2026-0391 |
Cargo.lock | [email protected] (crates.io) is affected by RUSTSEC-2026-0391 | Dependencies (osv-scanner) |
| medium | osv/RUSTSEC-2026-0395 |
Cargo.lock | [email protected] (crates.io) is affected by RUSTSEC-2026-0395 | Dependencies (osv-scanner) |
| medium | osv/RUSTSEC-2026-0396 |
Cargo.lock | [email protected] (crates.io) is affected by RUSTSEC-2026-0396 | Dependencies (osv-scanner) |
| medium | osv/RUSTSEC-2026-0397 |
Cargo.lock | [email protected] (crates.io) is affected by RUSTSEC-2026-0397 | Dependencies (osv-scanner) |
| medium | osv/RUSTSEC-2026-0398 |
Cargo.lock | [email protected] (crates.io) is affected by RUSTSEC-2026-0398 | Dependencies (osv-scanner) |
| medium | osv/RUSTSEC-2026-0399 |
Cargo.lock | [email protected] (crates.io) is affected by RUSTSEC-2026-0399 | Dependencies (osv-scanner) |
| medium | osv/RUSTSEC-2026-0400 |
Cargo.lock | [email protected] (crates.io) is affected by RUSTSEC-2026-0400 | Dependencies (osv-scanner) |
| medium | osv/RUSTSEC-2026-0401 |
Cargo.lock | [email protected] (crates.io) is affected by RUSTSEC-2026-0401 | Dependencies (osv-scanner) |
| medium | osv/RUSTSEC-2026-0402 |
Cargo.lock | [email protected] (crates.io) is affected by RUSTSEC-2026-0402 | Dependencies (osv-scanner) |
| medium | osv/RUSTSEC-2026-0403 |
Cargo.lock | [email protected] (crates.io) is affected by RUSTSEC-2026-0403 | Dependencies (osv-scanner) |
| medium | osv/RUSTSEC-2026-0404 |
Cargo.lock | [email protected] (crates.io) is affected by RUSTSEC-2026-0404 | Dependencies (osv-scanner) |
| medium | osv/RUSTSEC-2026-0405 |
Cargo.lock | [email protected] (crates.io) is affected by RUSTSEC-2026-0405 | Dependencies (osv-scanner) |
| medium | osv/RUSTSEC-2026-0406 |
Cargo.lock | [email protected] (crates.io) is affected by RUSTSEC-2026-0406 | Dependencies (osv-scanner) |
| medium | osv/RUSTSEC-2026-0410 |
Cargo.lock | [email protected]+zstd.1.5.7 (crates.io) is affected by RUSTSEC-2026-0410 | Dependencies (osv-scanner) |
| medium | osv/RUSTSEC-2026-0441 |
Cargo.lock | [email protected] (crates.io) is affected by RUSTSEC-2026-0441 | Dependencies (osv-scanner) |
| medium | osv/RUSTSEC-2026-0442 |
Cargo.lock | [email protected] (crates.io) is affected by RUSTSEC-2026-0442 | Dependencies (osv-scanner) |
| medium | osv/RUSTSEC-2026-0486 |
Cargo.lock | [email protected] (crates.io) is affected by RUSTSEC-2026-0486 | Dependencies (osv-scanner) |
| medium | osv/RUSTSEC-2026-0523 |
Cargo.lock | [email protected] (crates.io) is affected by RUSTSEC-2026-0523 | Dependencies (osv-scanner) |
| medium | osv/RUSTSEC-2026-0524 |
Cargo.lock | [email protected] (crates.io) is affected by RUSTSEC-2026-0524 | Dependencies (osv-scanner) |
| medium | osv/RUSTSEC-2026-0538 |
Cargo.lock | [email protected] (crates.io) is affected by RUSTSEC-2026-0538 | Dependencies (osv-scanner) |
| low | osv/GHSA-h2v8-394m-p7vv |
Cargo.lock | [email protected] (crates.io) is affected by RUSTSEC-2026-0348, GHSA-h2v8-394m-p7vv | Dependencies (osv-scanner) |
| low | osv/GHSA-w44r-93j7-qv28 |
Cargo.lock | [email protected] (crates.io) is affected by RUSTSEC-2026-0349, GHSA-w44r-93j7-qv28 | Dependencies (osv-scanner) |
| low | opengrep/rust.lang.security.unsafe-usage |
src/main.rs:295 | Detected 'unsafe' usage, please audit for secure usage [confidence high] | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| low | opengrep/rust.lang.security.temp-dir |
src/sources/csv.rs:451 | temp_dir should not be used for security operations. From the docs: 'The temporary directory may be shared among users, or between processes with different privileges; thus, the creation of any files or directories in the temporary... | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| low | opengrep/rust.lang.security.unsafe-usage |
src/view.rs:4206 | Detected 'unsafe' usage, please audit for secure usage [confidence high] | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| low | opengrep/rust.lang.security.temp-dir |
src/workbook.rs:3457 | temp_dir should not be used for security operations. From the docs: 'The temporary directory may be shared among users, or between processes with different privileges; thus, the creation of any files or directories in the temporary... | Static analysis (opengrep) |
Tools and coverage
Every analyzer that ran on this commit. A failed or skipped tool is a coverage gap: its share of the score is left out and the coverage figure drops.
| Analyzer | Pillar | Status | Version | Findings | Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI tool configuration | AI provenance | ok | signatures-v1 | 0 | |
| Explicit AI attribution | AI provenance | ok | signatures-v1 | 0 | |
| Release velocity | AI provenance | skipped | — | 0 | |
| Coding style | AI provenance | ok | — | 0 | |
| Commit velocity | AI provenance | ok | prov-4 | 0 | |
| Complexity (lizard) | Code quality | ok | lizard 1.25.1 | 0 | |
| Documentation | Code quality | ok | — | 0 | |
| Duplication (jscpd) | Code quality | ok | repotrust-dup-w6 | 0 | |
| Lint | Code quality | ok | opengrep 1.33.1; rules f1d2b562b414 | 0 | |
| Tests and CI | Code quality | ok | — | 0 | |
| Type safety | Code quality | ok | — | 0 | |
| CI workflows (zizmor) | Security | ok | zizmor 1.32.0 | 0 | |
| Dependencies (osv-scanner) | Security | ok | osv-scanner version: 2.7.1 | 64 | |
| Release downloads | Security | ok | — | 0 | |
| Security posture | Security | ok | — | 0 | |
| Package registries | Security | ok | — | 0 | |
| Static analysis (opengrep) | Security | ok | opengrep 1.33.1; rules f1d2b562b414 | 4 | |
| OpenSSF Scorecard | Security | skipped | — | 0 | no published OpenSSF Scorecard result for this repo |
| Secrets (gitleaks) | Security | ok | gitleaks 8.30.1 | 0 |
Score history
Scores from different scoring versions aren't directly comparable.
| Scored | Commit | Scoring | AI provenance | Quality | Security |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-11-14 | 180cfaccbcc0 | prov-5+qual-2+sec-2 | 0% | 60 | 70 |
| 2026-11-14 | 180cfaccbcc0 | prov-4+qual-2+sec-2 | 0% | 60 | 70 |
Full text report
- Repository: https://github.com/samuelcolvin/spread
- Commit:
180cfaccbcc0304233cfb6e8417c5c82641df59b - Generated: 2026-11-14T14:52:07+00:00
- Scorer 0.1.0, scoring prov-5+qual-2+sec-2, report schema v2
Scores
| Pillar | Score | Signal | Confidence | Coverage |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI provenance (estimated AI-generated share) | 0 | possible | 52% | 100% |
| Code quality | 60 | weak | 90% | 100% |
| Security | 70 | adequate | 85% | 100% |
AI provenance
Weak signals consistent with AI-assisted development.
-
Explicitly attributed share (lower bound): 0.0%
-
Unattributed share in AI-consistent velocity bursts: 0.0%
-
Estimated AI-generated share: 0.0%
-
AI tooling configured in repo: claude-code, generic-agent
| Month | Lines added | Attributed to AI |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-05 | 12,508 | 0% |
| 2026-06 | 1,078 | 0% |
Evidence
- CLAUDE.md (claude-code configuration) (CLAUDE.md)
- AGENTS.md (generic-agent configuration) (AGENTS.md)
AI provenance describes how code was produced; it is not a quality judgment. Unless attribution is explicit, these are signals consistent with AI generation, not proof. Squash/rebase workflows, imported code, and rewritten history reduce accuracy.
Code quality
Code quality is weak: test-to-source ratio 0.00, CI runs tests; 16% of function code in complex or long functions; 9% duplicated lines. Weakest area: type safety.
| Area | Score |
|---|---|
| Complexity (lizard) | 62 |
| Duplication | 59 |
| Code smells (Opengrep) | 100 |
| Tests and CI | 45 |
| Documentation | 65 |
| Type safety | 0 |
| Process (Scorecard review/maintenance) | n/a |
- Functions: 543; mean complexity 3.2, 90th percentile 7; 9 complex and 7 long functions
- Duplicated lines: 8.8% of 8,468 compared
- Tests: 0 test lines for 11,663 source lines (ratio 0.00); CI test commands: make test; 0% of recent source commits also change tests
- Docs missing or thin: contributing, changelog
Most complex functions:
- read_styles in src/sources/xlsx.rs: complexity 97, 180 lines
- read_sheet_metadata in src/sources/xlsx.rs: complexity 41, 90 lines
- run in src/main.rs: complexity 39, 208 lines
- parse_date_section in src/workbook.rs: complexity 30, 112 lines
- render_date_field in src/workbook.rs: complexity 25, 38 lines
Security
Security posture is adequate: 64 known vulnerabilities in 35 dependencies. Weakest area: dependencies.
| Area | Score |
|---|---|
| Secrets (gitleaks, tree + history) | 100 |
| Static analysis (Opengrep) | 97 |
| Vulnerable dependencies (OSV) | 9 |
| CI workflows (zizmor) | 100 |
| Posture (policy, updates, signing, lockfiles) | 20 |
| OpenSSF Scorecard | n/a |
-
Known vulnerabilities: 64 in 35 packages (critical 2, high 12, medium 4, low 2)
-
Posture checks passed: signed commits, lockfiles; missing: security policy, dependency updates
Top findings
| Severity | Finding | Location |
|---|---|---|
| critical | osv/RUSTSEC-2026-0369: [email protected] (crates.io) is affected by RUSTSEC-2026-0369 |
Cargo.lock |
| critical | osv/GHSA-m665-v7pm-7grj: [email protected] (crates.io) is affected by GHSA-m665-v7pm-7grj |
Cargo.lock |
| high | osv/RUSTSEC-2026-0436: [email protected] (crates.io) is affected by RUSTSEC-2026-0436 |
Cargo.lock |
| high | osv/RUSTSEC-2026-0194: [email protected] (crates.io) is affected by RUSTSEC-2026-0194 |
Cargo.lock |
| high | osv/RUSTSEC-2026-0195: [email protected] (crates.io) is affected by RUSTSEC-2026-0195 |
Cargo.lock |
| high | osv/RUSTSEC-2026-0194: [email protected] (crates.io) is affected by RUSTSEC-2026-0194 |
Cargo.lock |
| high | osv/RUSTSEC-2026-0195: [email protected] (crates.io) is affected by RUSTSEC-2026-0195 |
Cargo.lock |
| high | osv/GHSA-4w2j-m93h-cj5j: [email protected] (crates.io) is affected by RUSTSEC-2026-0185, GHSA-4w2j-m93h-cj5j |
Cargo.lock |
| high | osv/RUSTSEC-2026-0340: [email protected] (crates.io) is affected by RUSTSEC-2026-0340 |
Cargo.lock |
| high | osv/GHSA-2f9f-gq7v-9h6m: [email protected] (crates.io) is affected by RUSTSEC-2026-0435, GHSA-2f9f-gq7v-9h6m |
Cargo.lock |
| high | osv/RUSTSEC-2026-0367: [email protected] (crates.io) is affected by RUSTSEC-2026-0367 |
Cargo.lock |
| high | osv/GHSA-q7v9-x93c-xqv3: [email protected] (crates.io) is affected by RUSTSEC-2026-0429, GHSA-q7v9-x93c-xqv3 |
Cargo.lock |
| high | osv/GHSA-9hj8-73fh-9963: [email protected] (crates.io) is affected by GHSA-9hj8-73fh-9963 |
Cargo.lock |
| high | osv/GHSA-hjqx-j4rw-g7xv: [email protected] (crates.io) is affected by GHSA-hjqx-j4rw-g7xv |
Cargo.lock |
| medium | osv/RUSTSEC-2026-0190: [email protected] (crates.io) is affected by RUSTSEC-2026-0190 |
Cargo.lock |
| medium | osv/RUSTSEC-2026-0442: [email protected] (crates.io) is affected by RUSTSEC-2026-0442 |
Cargo.lock |
| medium | osv/RUSTSEC-2025-0052: [email protected] (crates.io) is affected by RUSTSEC-2025-0052 |
Cargo.lock |
| medium | osv/RUSTSEC-2026-0204: [email protected] (crates.io) is affected by RUSTSEC-2026-0204 |
Cargo.lock |
| medium | osv/RUSTSEC-2026-0221: [email protected] (crates.io) is affected by RUSTSEC-2026-0221 |
Cargo.lock |
| medium | osv/GHSA-38c5-483c-4qqp: [email protected] (crates.io) is affected by GHSA-38c5-483c-4qqp |
Cargo.lock |
| medium | osv/RUSTSEC-2026-0258: [email protected] (crates.io) is affected by RUSTSEC-2026-0258 |
Cargo.lock |
| medium | osv/RUSTSEC-2024-0384: [email protected] (crates.io) is affected by RUSTSEC-2024-0384 |
Cargo.lock |
| medium | osv/RUSTSEC-2026-0186: [email protected] (crates.io) is affected by RUSTSEC-2026-0186 |
Cargo.lock |
| medium | osv/RUSTSEC-2024-0436: [email protected] (crates.io) is affected by RUSTSEC-2024-0436 |
Cargo.lock |
| medium | osv/RUSTSEC-2026-0441: [email protected] (crates.io) is affected by RUSTSEC-2026-0441 |
Cargo.lock |
Static signals only: the scorer never runs the project's code. Secret findings are pattern matches that were not verified, and secret values are never stored.
Repository profile
- Source lines: 11,663; test lines: 0
| Language | Lines |
|---|---|
| Rust | 11,357 |
| Python | 243 |
| Shell | 63 |