Leaderboard github.com
romiojoseph/cardboard
A simple, local note editor for Android and Windows.
AI provenance
0%
none-detected
- Confidence
- 41%
- Coverage
- 100%
Estimated share of AI-generated code. Explicit attribution is a lower bound.
Code quality
71/100
adequate
- Confidence
- 90%
- Coverage
- 100%
Complexity, duplication, lint density, tests, CI, docs and review process.
Security
87/100
strong
- Confidence
- 85%
- Coverage
- 100%
Secrets, static analysis, vulnerable dependencies, CI and supply-chain posture.
AI provenance
0% none-detected
No AI attribution or AI-consistent velocity signals detected.
How the score is built
- Explicitly attributed share0%
- Unattributed share in AI-pace bursts0%
- Estimated AI-generated share0%
- AI tool configuration files0
- Work sessions at AI pace0
- Releases at AI pace0
- Coding-style index (1.0+ means possible)0.15
Lines added per month all AI-attributed share
- 2026-070 · 0% AI
- 2026-084,285 · 0% AI
- 2026-094,415 · 0% AI
Evidence by analyzer
Explicit AI attributionok
- attributed_commit_share
- 0.0%
- attributed_commits
- 0
- attributed_loc
- 0
- attributed_loc_share
- 0.0%
- commits
- 3
- effective_loc
- 8,700
- tools_detected
- 0
AI tool configurationok
- artifacts
- 0
- tools_configured
- 0
- workflow_agents
- 0
Commit velocityok
- excluded_import_loc
- 8,700
- flagged_loc
- 0
- flagged_loc_share
- 0.0%
- flagged_units
- 0
- max_loc_per_hour
- 0
- measured_loc
- 0
- median_loc_per_hour
- 0
- pr_timed_units
- 0
- pre_ai_era_burst_loc
- 0
- pre_ai_era_bursts
- 0
- pre_ai_era_measured_loc
- 0
- work_units
- 0
Release velocityok
- flagged_releases
- 0
- max_loc_per_day
- 0
- releases
- 1
Coding styleok1 item
- count:assistant_voice
- 0
- count:emoji_in_code
- 0
- count:narrated_steps
- 1
- count:placeholder
- 0
- files:assistant_voice
- 0
- files:emoji_in_code
- 0
- files:narrated_steps
- 1
- files:placeholder
- 0
- index
- 0.15
- lines_scanned
- 6,849
- per_kloc:assistant_voice
- 0
- per_kloc:emoji_in_code
- 0
- per_kloc:narrated_steps
- 0.15
- per_kloc:placeholder
- 0
Code quality
71 adequate
Code quality is adequate: test-to-source ratio 0.00, no CI test run detected; 0% of function code in complex or long functions; 5% duplicated lines. Weakest area: testing.
How the score is built
- Complexity100
- Duplication76
- Lint and smells100
- Tests and CI30
- Documentation65
- Type safetynot measured
- Review processnot measured
Evidence by analyzer
Complexity (lizard)ok
- complex_functions
- 0
- function_nloc
- 319
- functions
- 33
- long_functions
- 0
- many_param_functions
- 0
- mean_ccn
- 2.15
- p90_ccn
- 4
- risky_nloc_share
- 0.0%
Duplication (jscpd)ok6 items
- 6+ duplicated lines: lib/services/sync_server.dart:105 and lib/services/sync_server.dart:129
- 6+ duplicated lines: lib/utils/markdown_utils.dart:111 and lib/utils/markdown_utils.dart:142
- 6+ duplicated lines: lib/widgets/app_button.dart:31 and lib/widgets/app_button.dart:48
- 6+ duplicated lines: lib/widgets/export_dialog.dart:32 and lib/widgets/export_dialog.dart:45
- 6+ duplicated lines: lib/widgets/lan_sync_dialog.dart:246 and lib/widgets/lan_sync_dialog.dart:287
- 6+ duplicated lines: lib/widgets/markdown_editing_controller.dart:156 and lib/widgets/markdown_editing_controller.dart:171
- compared_lines
- 4,763
- duplicated_lines
- 218
- duplicated_share
- 4.6%
- files
- 46
Lintok
- findings
- 0
- scanned_lines
- 794
- weighted_findings
- 0
Tests and CIok
- check:ci_present
- no
- check:ci_runs_lint
- no
- check:ci_runs_tests
- no
- check:has_tests
- yes
- check:test_ratio
- no
- check:tests_cochange
- yes
- ci_files
- 0
- cochange_commits
- 2
- cochange_share
- 50.0%
- source_lines
- 6,849
- test_lines
- 9
- test_ratio
- 0.00
Documentationok2 items
- README.md
README.md - LICENSE
LICENSE
- check:changelog
- no
- check:contributing
- no
- check:license
- yes
- check:readme
- yes
- readme_lines
- 39
Type safetyskipped
Security
87 strong
Security posture is strong: no high-impact findings. Weakest area: posture.
How the score is built
- Secrets100
- Static analysis (SAST)100
- Vulnerable dependencies100
- CI workflowsnot measured
- Security posture0
- OpenSSF Scorecardnot measured
Evidence by analyzer
OpenSSF Scorecardskipped
no published OpenSSF Scorecard result for this repo
Package registriesskipped
no registry dependencies declared
Secrets (gitleaks)ok
- secrets_current
- 0
- secrets_history
- 0
- secrets_low_confidence
- 0
- secrets_nonprod
- 0
Static analysis (opengrep)ok
- findings
- 0
- findings_high
- 0
- findings_low
- 0
- findings_medium
- 0
- parse_errors
- 1
- scanned_lines
- 794
- weighted_findings
- 0
Dependencies (osv-scanner)ok
- penalty
- 0
- vulnerabilities
- 0
- vulnerable_packages
- 0
- vulns_critical
- 0
- vulns_high
- 0
- vulns_low
- 0
- vulns_medium
- 0
- vulns_unknown
- 0
CI workflows (zizmor)skipped
Security postureok
- check:dependency_updates
- no
- check:lockfiles
- yes
- check:security_policy
- no
- check:signed_commits
- no
- signed_commit_share
- 33.3%
- unpinned_manifests
- 0
Release downloadsok
- binary_assets
- 0
- signals
- 0
- suspicious
- 0
Findings
No line-level findings.
Tools and coverage
Every analyzer that ran on this commit. A failed or skipped tool is a coverage gap: its share of the score is left out and the coverage figure drops.
| Analyzer | Pillar | Status | Version | Findings | Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI tool configuration | AI provenance | ok | signatures-v1 | 0 | |
| Explicit AI attribution | AI provenance | ok | signatures-v1 | 0 | |
| Release velocity | AI provenance | ok | prov-4 | 0 | |
| Coding style | AI provenance | ok | — | 0 | |
| Commit velocity | AI provenance | ok | prov-4 | 0 | |
| Complexity (lizard) | Code quality | ok | lizard 1.25.1 | 0 | |
| Documentation | Code quality | ok | — | 0 | |
| Duplication (jscpd) | Code quality | ok | repotrust-dup-w6 | 0 | |
| Lint | Code quality | ok | opengrep 1.33.1; rules f1d2b562b414 | 0 | |
| Tests and CI | Code quality | ok | — | 0 | |
| Type safety | Code quality | skipped | — | 0 | |
| CI workflows (zizmor) | Security | skipped | — | 0 | |
| Dependencies (osv-scanner) | Security | ok | osv-scanner version: 2.7.1 | 0 | |
| Release downloads | Security | ok | — | 0 | |
| Security posture | Security | ok | — | 0 | |
| Package registries | Security | skipped | — | 0 | no registry dependencies declared |
| Static analysis (opengrep) | Security | ok | opengrep 1.33.1; rules f1d2b562b414 | 0 | |
| OpenSSF Scorecard | Security | skipped | — | 0 | no published OpenSSF Scorecard result for this repo |
| Secrets (gitleaks) | Security | ok | gitleaks 8.30.1 | 0 |
Score history
Scores from different scoring versions aren't directly comparable.
| Scored | Commit | Scoring | AI provenance | Quality | Security |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-11-14 | f90adefa0dbc | prov-5+qual-2+sec-2 | 0% | 71 | 87 |
| 2026-11-14 | f90adefa0dbc | prov-4+qual-2+sec-2 | 0% | 71 | 87 |
Full text report
- Repository: https://github.com/romiojoseph/cardboard
- Commit:
f90adefa0dbcc21794897c190b871320308eb4c6 - Generated: 2026-11-14T14:52:07+00:00
- Scorer 0.1.0, scoring prov-5+qual-2+sec-2, report schema v2
Scores
| Pillar | Score | Signal | Confidence | Coverage |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI provenance (estimated AI-generated share) | 0 | none-detected | 41% | 100% |
| Code quality | 71 | adequate | 90% | 100% |
| Security | 87 | strong | 85% | 100% |
AI provenance
No AI attribution or AI-consistent velocity signals detected.
-
Explicitly attributed share (lower bound): 0.0%
-
Unattributed share in AI-consistent velocity bursts: 0.0%
-
Estimated AI-generated share: 0.0%
-
Stylometry index: 0.15 per 1,000 lines (narrated steps 1, placeholders 0, assistant phrasing 0, emoji 0). Reported as a signal, not scored.
| Month | Lines added | Attributed to AI |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-08 | 4,285 | 0% |
| 2026-09 | 4,415 | 0% |
Evidence
- step-by-step narration comment: // First, find the length of the string with a safe upper bound (CWE-126). (windows/runn)
AI provenance describes how code was produced; it is not a quality judgment. Unless attribution is explicit, these are signals consistent with AI generation, not proof. Squash/rebase workflows, imported code, and rewritten history reduce accuracy.
Code quality
Code quality is adequate: test-to-source ratio 0.00, no CI test run detected; 0% of function code in complex or long functions; 5% duplicated lines. Weakest area: testing.
| Area | Score |
|---|---|
| Complexity (lizard) | 100 |
| Duplication | 76 |
| Code smells (Opengrep) | 100 |
| Tests and CI | 30 |
| Documentation | 65 |
| Type safety | n/a |
| Process (Scorecard review/maintenance) | n/a |
- Functions: 33; mean complexity 2.1, 90th percentile 4; 0 complex and 0 long functions
- Duplicated lines: 4.6% of 4,763 compared
- Tests: 9 test lines for 6,849 source lines (ratio 0.00); CI test commands: none detected; 50% of recent source commits also change tests
- Docs missing or thin: contributing, changelog
Security
Security posture is strong: no high-impact findings. Weakest area: posture.
| Area | Score |
|---|---|
| Secrets (gitleaks, tree + history) | 100 |
| Static analysis (Opengrep) | 100 |
| Vulnerable dependencies (OSV) | 100 |
| CI workflows (zizmor) | n/a |
| Posture (policy, updates, signing, lockfiles) | 0 |
| OpenSSF Scorecard | n/a |
- Posture checks passed: lockfiles; missing: security policy, dependency updates, signed commits
Static signals only: the scorer never runs the project's code. Secret findings are pattern matches that were not verified, and secret values are never stored.
Repository profile
- Source lines: 6,849; test lines: 9
| Language | Lines |
|---|---|
| Dart | 5,803 |
| C++ | 494 |
| PowerShell | 261 |
| C | 185 |
| Kotlin | 115 |