Leaderboard github.com

rohitramkumar/zebra-viz

Tracking NCAA referees

View repository ↗
TypeScript
★ 0
commit dd4938843543
scored 2026-11-14
scoring prov-5+qual-2+sec-2

unreviewed-ai-risk

AI provenance

73%

explicit

Confidence: 95%
Coverage: 100%

Estimated share of AI-generated code. Explicit attribution is a lower bound.

Code quality

46/100

poor

Confidence: 90%
Coverage: 100%

Complexity, duplication, lint density, tests, CI, docs and review process.

Security

60/100

weak

Confidence: 85%
Coverage: 100%

Secrets, static analysis, vulnerable dependencies, CI and supply-chain posture.

Dispute or request a re-score Full report JSON

AI provenance

73% explicit

Explicit AI attribution on 73% of first-party code added; an estimated 73% including velocity signals.

How the score is built

Explicitly attributed share73%
Unattributed share in AI-pace bursts0%
Estimated AI-generated share73%
AI tool configuration files0
Work sessions at AI pace0
Releases at AI pacenot measured
Coding-style index (1.0+ means possible)3.64

Attributed AI tools

Tool	Commits	Lines added	First seen	Last seen
GitHub Copilot coding agent	62	2,026	2026-02-26	2026-03-27

Lines added per month all AI-attributed share

2026-022,112 · 65% AI
2026-03677 · 96% AI
2026-040 · 0% AI
2026-050 · 0% AI
2026-060 · 0% AI
2026-070 · 0% AI
2026-080 · 0% AI
2026-090 · 0% AI
2026-100 · 0% AI
2026-110 · 0% AI

Findings in AI-attributed lines vs the rest

From git blame: 1,341 lines trace to AI-attributed commits, 580 to others. Reported, not scored.

Findings per 1,000 lines	AI-attributed	Other	Ratio
Code quality	0.00	1.72	0.00×
Security	0.00	1.72	0.00×

Evidence by analyzer

Explicit AI attributionok26 items

attributed_commit_share: 40.3%
attributed_commits: 62
attributed_loc: 2,026
attributed_loc_share: 72.6%
commits: 154
effective_loc: 2,789
tools_detected: 1

AI tool configurationok

artifacts: 0
tools_configured: 0
workflow_agents: 0

Commit velocityok

excluded_import_loc: 0
flagged_loc: 0
flagged_loc_share: 0.0%
flagged_units: 0
max_loc_per_hour: 238.90
measured_loc: 2,789
median_loc_per_hour: 58.20
pr_timed_units: 0
pre_ai_era_burst_loc: 0
pre_ai_era_bursts: 0
pre_ai_era_measured_loc: 0
work_units: 18

Release velocityskipped

Coding styleok2 items

count:assistant_voice: 0
count:emoji_in_code: 10
count:narrated_steps: 2
count:placeholder: 0
files:assistant_voice: 0
files:emoji_in_code: 4
files:narrated_steps: 1
files:placeholder: 0
index: 3.64
lines_scanned: 1,921
per_kloc:assistant_voice: 0
per_kloc:emoji_in_code: 5.21
per_kloc:narrated_steps: 1.04
per_kloc:placeholder: 0

Findings in AI-written linesok

ai_lines: 1,341
blame_failures: 0
files_blamed: 12
other_lines: 580
quality:ai_findings: 0
quality:ai_per_kloc: 0
quality:other_findings: 1
quality:other_per_kloc: 1.72
quality:ratio: 0
security:ai_findings: 0
security:ai_per_kloc: 0
security:other_findings: 1
security:other_per_kloc: 1.72
security:ratio: 0

Code quality

46 poor

Code quality is poor: test-to-source ratio 0.00, no CI test run detected; 15% of function code in complex or long functions; 10% duplicated lines. Weakest area: testing.

How the score is built

Complexity64
Duplication54
Lint and smells68
Tests and CI15
Documentation40
Type safety46
Review processnot measured

Evidence by analyzer

Complexity (lizard)ok1 item

MapVisualization in frontend/src/components/MapVisualization.tsx: complexity 19, 169 lines

complex_functions: 1
function_nloc: 1,144
functions: 96
long_functions: 1
many_param_functions: 0
mean_ccn: 2.56
p90_ccn: 6
risky_nloc_share: 14.8%

Duplication (jscpd)ok5 items

compared_lines: 1,442
duplicated_lines: 146
duplicated_share: 10.1%
files: 12

Lintok

category:best-practice: 1
findings: 1
scanned_lines: 1,921
weighted_findings: 3

Tests and CIok1 item

CI config: .github/workflows/refresh-referee-data.yml .github/workflows/refresh-referee-data.yml

check:ci_present: yes
check:ci_runs_lint: no
check:ci_runs_tests: no
check:has_tests: no
check:test_ratio: no
check:tests_cochange: no
ci_files: 1
cochange_commits: 43
cochange_share: 0.0%
source_lines: 1,921
test_lines: 0
test_ratio: 0

Documentationok1 item

README.md README.md

check:changelog: no
check:contributing: no
check:license: no
check:readme: yes
readme_lines: 38

Type safetyok1 item

TypeScript strict type checking: tsconfig.json tsconfig.json

check:low_escape_density: no
check:strict_config: no
escapes: 18
escapes_per_kloc: 9.37

Security

60 weak

Security posture is weak: 30 known vulnerabilities in 13 dependencies; 1 high-severity SAST findings; 2 high-severity workflow issues. Weakest area: posture.

How the score is built

Secrets100
Static analysis (SAST)69
Vulnerable dependencies26
CI workflows66
Security posture0
OpenSSF Scorecardnot measured

Evidence by analyzer

OpenSSF Scorecardskipped

no published OpenSSF Scorecard result for this repo

Package registriesok

checked: 18
declared: 18
lookup_errors: 0
missing: 0
recent: 0

Secrets (gitleaks)ok

secrets_current: 0
secrets_history: 0
secrets_low_confidence: 0
secrets_nonprod: 0

Static analysis (opengrep)ok

findings: 2
findings_high: 1
findings_low: 0
findings_medium: 1
parse_errors: 0
scanned_lines: 1,921
weighted_findings: 2.05

Dependencies (osv-scanner)ok

penalty: 82
vulnerabilities: 30
vulnerable_packages: 13
vulns_critical: 1
vulns_high: 11
vulns_low: 4
vulns_medium: 14
vulns_unknown: 0

CI workflows (zizmor)ok

findings: 3
findings_high: 2
findings_low: 0
findings_medium: 1
penalty: 25.20
workflows: 1

Security postureok

check:dependency_updates: no
check:lockfiles: yes
check:security_policy: no
check:signed_commits: no
signed_commit_share: 1.9%
unpinned_manifests: 0

Release downloadsok

binary_assets: 0
signals: 0
suspicious: 0

Findings

1 critical15 high16 medium4 low

Severity	Rule	Location	Message	Tool
critical	`osv/GHSA-jqcg-44mw-7w3h`	package-lock.json	[email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-jqcg-44mw-7w3h	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
high	`opengrep/python.lang.best-practice.arbitrary-sleep`	data/refresh-referee-data.py:226	time.sleep() call; did you mean to leave this in?	Lint
high	`zizmor/unpinned-uses`	.github/workflows/refresh-referee-data.yml:15	unpinned action reference [confidence high]	CI workflows (zizmor)
high	`zizmor/unpinned-uses`	.github/workflows/refresh-referee-data.yml:17	unpinned action reference [confidence high]	CI workflows (zizmor)
high	`opengrep/dockerfile.security.missing-user`	Dockerfile:41	By not specifying a USER, a program in the container may run as 'root'. This is a security hazard. If an attacker can control a process running as root, they may have control over the container. Ensure that the last USER in a Dockerfile...	Static analysis (opengrep)
high	`osv/GHSA-27r3-jxmh-p828`	package-lock.json	[email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-27r3-jxmh-p828	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
high	`osv/GHSA-28wg-ghj8-5hjv`	package-lock.json	[email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-28wg-ghj8-5hjv	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
high	`osv/GHSA-2v37-7h3g-55p8`	package-lock.json	[email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-2v37-7h3g-55p8	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
high	`osv/GHSA-37ch-88jc-xwx2`	package-lock.json	[email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-37ch-88jc-xwx2	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
high	`osv/GHSA-587h-7wmj-h5pm`	package-lock.json	[email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-587h-7wmj-h5pm	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
high	`osv/GHSA-68fv-2mgg-jv7q`	package-lock.json	[email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-68fv-2mgg-jv7q	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
high	`osv/GHSA-6g55-p6wh-862q`	package-lock.json	[email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-6g55-p6wh-862q	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
high	`osv/GHSA-73wf-gq98-2v4g`	package-lock.json	[email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-73wf-gq98-2v4g	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
high	`osv/GHSA-c83g-rgw3-j3cx`	package-lock.json	[email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-c83g-rgw3-j3cx	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
high	`osv/GHSA-r28c-9q8g-f849`	package-lock.json	[email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-r28c-9q8g-f849	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
high	`osv/GHSA-xwg4-73v4-xw9w`	package-lock.json	[email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-xwg4-73v4-xw9w	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
medium	`zizmor/artipacked`	.github/workflows/refresh-referee-data.yml:15	credential persistence through GitHub Actions artifacts [confidence low]	CI workflows (zizmor)
medium	`opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.dynamic-urllib-use-detected`	data/refresh-referee-data.py:205	Detected a dynamic value being used with urllib. urllib supports 'file://' schemes, so a dynamic value controlled by a malicious actor may allow them to read arbitrary files. Audit uses of urllib calls to ensure user data cannot control...	Static analysis (opengrep)
medium	`osv/GHSA-4mjr-xmp4-gh2g`	package-lock.json	[email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-4mjr-xmp4-gh2g	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
medium	`osv/GHSA-4w7w-66w2-5vf9`	package-lock.json	[email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-4w7w-66w2-5vf9	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
medium	`osv/GHSA-67mh-4wv8-2f99`	package-lock.json	[email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-67mh-4wv8-2f99	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
medium	`osv/GHSA-698v-4r3x-3vcv`	package-lock.json	[email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-698v-4r3x-3vcv	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
medium	`osv/GHSA-6pq8-jhm2-2vcw`	package-lock.json	[email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-6pq8-jhm2-2vcw	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
medium	`osv/GHSA-fx2h-pf6j-xcff`	package-lock.json	[email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-fx2h-pf6j-xcff	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
medium	`osv/GHSA-fxqj-rqcc-2cmp`	package-lock.json	[email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-fxqj-rqcc-2cmp	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
medium	`osv/GHSA-q8mj-m7cp-5q26`	package-lock.json	[email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-q8mj-m7cp-5q26	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
medium	`osv/GHSA-qx2v-qp2m-jg93`	package-lock.json	[email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-qx2v-qp2m-jg93	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
medium	`osv/GHSA-r825-w8mm-5pxw`	package-lock.json	[email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-r825-w8mm-5pxw	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
medium	`osv/GHSA-rq7h-c2jc-7f22`	package-lock.json	[email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-rq7h-c2jc-7f22	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
medium	`osv/GHSA-v6wh-96g9-6wx3`	package-lock.json	[email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-v6wh-96g9-6wx3	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
medium	`osv/GHSA-w5vr-8v7q-w6rv`	package-lock.json	[email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-w5vr-8v7q-w6rv	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
medium	`osv/GHSA-x5fp-wj9c-mxmx`	package-lock.json	[email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-x5fp-wj9c-mxmx	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
low	`osv/GHSA-4x5r-pxfx-6jf8`	package-lock.json	@babel/[email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-4x5r-pxfx-6jf8	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
low	`osv/GHSA-9jrq-w75r-8gcw`	package-lock.json	[email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-9jrq-w75r-8gcw	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
low	`osv/GHSA-g7r4-m6w7-qqqr`	package-lock.json	[email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-g7r4-m6w7-qqqr	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
low	`osv/GHSA-v422-hmwv-36x6`	package-lock.json	[email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-v422-hmwv-36x6	Dependencies (osv-scanner)

Tools and coverage

Every analyzer that ran on this commit. A failed or skipped tool is a coverage gap: its share of the score is left out and the coverage figure drops.

Analyzer	Pillar	Status	Version	Findings	Note
AI tool configuration	AI provenance	ok	`signatures-v1`	0
Explicit AI attribution	AI provenance	ok	`signatures-v1`	0
Release velocity	AI provenance	skipped	`—`	0
Coding style	AI provenance	ok	`—`	0
Commit velocity	AI provenance	ok	`prov-4`	0
Findings in AI-written lines	AI provenance	ok	`git-blame`	0
Complexity (lizard)	Code quality	ok	`lizard 1.25.1`	0
Documentation	Code quality	ok	`—`	0
Duplication (jscpd)	Code quality	ok	`repotrust-dup-w6`	0
Lint	Code quality	ok	`opengrep 1.33.1; rules f1d2b562b414`	1
Tests and CI	Code quality	ok	`—`	0
Type safety	Code quality	ok	`—`	0
CI workflows (zizmor)	Security	ok	`zizmor 1.32.0`	3
Dependencies (osv-scanner)	Security	ok	`osv-scanner version: 2.7.1`	30
Release downloads	Security	ok	`—`	0
Security posture	Security	ok	`—`	0
Package registries	Security	ok	`—`	0
Static analysis (opengrep)	Security	ok	`opengrep 1.33.1; rules f1d2b562b414`	2
OpenSSF Scorecard	Security	skipped	`—`	0	no published OpenSSF Scorecard result for this repo
Secrets (gitleaks)	Security	ok	`gitleaks 8.30.1`	0

Score history

Scores from different scoring versions aren't directly comparable.

Scored	Commit	Scoring	AI provenance	Quality	Security
2026-11-14	`dd4938843543`	`prov-5+qual-2+sec-2`	73%	46	60
2026-11-14	`dd4938843543`	`prov-4+qual-2+sec-2`	73%	46	60

Embed a badge

Maintainers can show these in a README. Badges update when the repository is re-scored.

[![RepoTrust ai](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/badge/github.com/rohitramkumar/zebra-viz/ai.svg)](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/r/github.com/rohitramkumar/zebra-viz/)

[![RepoTrust quality](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/badge/github.com/rohitramkumar/zebra-viz/quality.svg)](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/r/github.com/rohitramkumar/zebra-viz/)

[![RepoTrust security](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/badge/github.com/rohitramkumar/zebra-viz/security.svg)](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/r/github.com/rohitramkumar/zebra-viz/)

Full text report

Repository: https://github.com/rohitramkumar/zebra-viz
Commit: dd493884354343c1c76e25aea1cef18f605fc07d
Generated: 2026-11-14T14:52:07+00:00
Scorer 0.1.0, scoring prov-5+qual-2+sec-2, report schema v2

Scores

Unreviewed AI code risk: a large share of this code is explicitly AI-attributed, and its tests or review process are weak while quality or security scores are low.

Pillar	Score	Signal	Confidence	Coverage
AI provenance (estimated AI-generated share)	73	explicit	95%	100%
Code quality	46	poor	90%	100%
Security	60	weak	85%	100%

AI provenance

Explicit AI attribution on 73% of first-party code added; an estimated 73% including velocity signals.

Explicitly attributed share (lower bound): 72.6%
Unattributed share in AI-consistent velocity bursts: 0.0%
Estimated AI-generated share: 72.6%

AI tool	Attributed commits	Lines added
GitHub Copilot coding agent	62	2,026

Current source lines last changed by AI-attributed commits: 1,341 of 1,921.

Findings per 1,000 lines	AI-attributed	Other	Ratio
Quality	0.0	1.724	0.0x
Security	0.0	1.724	0.0x

Stylometry index: 3.64 per 1,000 lines (narrated steps 2, placeholders 0, assistant phrasing 0, emoji 10). Reported as a signal, not scored.

Month	Lines added	Attributed to AI
2026-02	2,112	65%
2026-03	677	96%

Evidence

GitHub Copilot coding agent: author copilot-swe-agent[bot] (8eaeea2105ff)
GitHub Copilot coding agent: author copilot-swe-agent[bot] (518299b26e44)
GitHub Copilot coding agent: author copilot-swe-agent[bot] (7c6ccd8a8f21)
GitHub Copilot coding agent: author copilot-swe-agent[bot] (7cb99401091d)
GitHub Copilot coding agent: author copilot-swe-agent[bot] (6fa894fa24c0)
GitHub Copilot coding agent: author copilot-swe-agent[bot] (8120b78cbbe5)
GitHub Copilot coding agent: author copilot-swe-agent[bot] (a3395e171e34)
GitHub Copilot coding agent: author copilot-swe-agent[bot] (8b235f7fb413)
GitHub Copilot coding agent: author copilot-swe-agent[bot] (715180184c23)
GitHub Copilot coding agent: author copilot-swe-agent[bot] (139a84ee9536)
GitHub Copilot coding agent: author copilot-swe-agent[bot] (8e5cea811b3e)
GitHub Copilot coding agent: author copilot-swe-agent[bot] (3c2b3f42fb25)
GitHub Copilot coding agent: author copilot-swe-agent[bot] (f879b01db1bc)
GitHub Copilot coding agent: author copilot-swe-agent[bot] (746395f3644e)
GitHub Copilot coding agent: author copilot-swe-agent[bot] (c29c444a8638)

AI provenance describes how code was produced; it is not a quality judgment. Unless attribution is explicit, these are signals consistent with AI generation, not proof. Squash/rebase workflows, imported code, and rewritten history reduce accuracy.

Code quality

Code quality is poor: test-to-source ratio 0.00, no CI test run detected; 15% of function code in complex or long functions; 10% duplicated lines. Weakest area: testing.

Area	Score
Complexity (lizard)	64
Duplication	54
Code smells (Opengrep)	68
Tests and CI	15
Documentation	40
Type safety	46
Process (Scorecard review/maintenance)	n/a

Functions: 96; mean complexity 2.6, 90th percentile 6; 1 complex and 1 long functions
Duplicated lines: 10.1% of 1,442 compared
Tests: 0 test lines for 1,921 source lines (ratio 0.00); CI test commands: none detected; 0% of recent source commits also change tests
Docs missing or thin: license, contributing, changelog

Most complex functions:

MapVisualization in frontend/src/components/MapVisualization.tsx: complexity 19, 169 lines

Security

Security posture is weak: 30 known vulnerabilities in 13 dependencies; 1 high-severity SAST findings; 2 high-severity workflow issues. Weakest area: posture.

Area	Score
Secrets (gitleaks, tree + history)	100
Static analysis (Opengrep)	69
Vulnerable dependencies (OSV)	26
CI workflows (zizmor)	66
Posture (policy, updates, signing, lockfiles)	0
OpenSSF Scorecard	n/a

Known vulnerabilities: 30 in 13 packages (critical 1, high 11, medium 14, low 4)
Posture checks passed: lockfiles; missing: security policy, dependency updates, signed commits

Top findings

Severity	Finding	Location
critical	`osv/GHSA-jqcg-44mw-7w3h`: [email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-jqcg-44mw-7w3h	package-lock.json
high	`opengrep/dockerfile.security.missing-user`: By not specifying a USER, a program in the container may run as 'root'. This is a security hazard. If an attacker can control a process running as root, they may have control over the container. Ensure that the last USER in a Dockerfile is a USER other than 'root'. [confidence medium]	Dockerfile:41
high	`osv/GHSA-27r3-jxmh-p828`: [email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-27r3-jxmh-p828	package-lock.json
high	`osv/GHSA-73wf-gq98-2v4g`: [email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-73wf-gq98-2v4g	package-lock.json
high	`osv/GHSA-c83g-rgw3-j3cx`: [email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-c83g-rgw3-j3cx	package-lock.json
high	`osv/GHSA-28wg-ghj8-5hjv`: [email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-28wg-ghj8-5hjv	package-lock.json
high	`osv/GHSA-2v37-7h3g-55p8`: [email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-2v37-7h3g-55p8	package-lock.json
high	`osv/GHSA-xwg4-73v4-xw9w`: [email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-xwg4-73v4-xw9w	package-lock.json
high	`osv/GHSA-37ch-88jc-xwx2`: [email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-37ch-88jc-xwx2	package-lock.json
high	`osv/GHSA-6g55-p6wh-862q`: [email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-6g55-p6wh-862q	package-lock.json
high	`osv/GHSA-r28c-9q8g-f849`: [email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-r28c-9q8g-f849	package-lock.json
high	`osv/GHSA-68fv-2mgg-jv7q`: [email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-68fv-2mgg-jv7q	package-lock.json
high	`osv/GHSA-587h-7wmj-h5pm`: [email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-587h-7wmj-h5pm	package-lock.json
high	`zizmor/unpinned-uses`: unpinned action reference [confidence high]	.github/workflows/refresh-referee-data.yml:15
high	`zizmor/unpinned-uses`: unpinned action reference [confidence high]	.github/workflows/refresh-referee-data.yml:17
medium	`opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.dynamic-urllib-use-detected`: Detected a dynamic value being used with urllib. urllib supports 'file://' schemes, so a dynamic value controlled by a malicious actor may allow them to read arbitrary files. Audit uses of urllib calls to ensure user data cannot control the URLs, or consider using the 'requests' library instead. [confidence low]	data/refresh-referee-data.py:205
medium	`osv/GHSA-w5vr-8v7q-w6rv`: [email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-w5vr-8v7q-w6rv	package-lock.json
medium	`osv/GHSA-67mh-4wv8-2f99`: [email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-67mh-4wv8-2f99	package-lock.json
medium	`osv/GHSA-fxqj-rqcc-2cmp`: [email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-fxqj-rqcc-2cmp	package-lock.json
medium	`osv/GHSA-qx2v-qp2m-jg93`: [email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-qx2v-qp2m-jg93	package-lock.json
medium	`osv/GHSA-4mjr-xmp4-gh2g`: [email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-4mjr-xmp4-gh2g	package-lock.json
medium	`osv/GHSA-6pq8-jhm2-2vcw`: [email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-6pq8-jhm2-2vcw	package-lock.json
medium	`osv/GHSA-q8mj-m7cp-5q26`: [email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-q8mj-m7cp-5q26	package-lock.json
medium	`osv/GHSA-x5fp-wj9c-mxmx`: [email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-x5fp-wj9c-mxmx	package-lock.json
medium	`osv/GHSA-4w7w-66w2-5vf9`: [email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-4w7w-66w2-5vf9	package-lock.json

Static signals only: the scorer never runs the project's code. Secret findings are pattern matches that were not verified, and secret values are never stored.

Repository profile

Source lines: 1,921; test lines: 0

Language	Lines
TypeScript	1,462
Python	459