RepoTrust

Leaderboard github.com

rnd-ash/ultimate-nag52-fw

Ultimate NAG52 firmware repository

  • View repository ↗
  • C++
  • ★ 115
  • commit ed602818dc08
  • scored 2026-11-14
  • scoring prov-5+qual-2+sec-2

AI provenance

0%

explicit

Confidence
95%
Coverage
100%

Estimated share of AI-generated code. Explicit attribution is a lower bound.

Code quality

51/100

weak

Confidence
90%
Coverage
100%

Complexity, duplication, lint density, tests, CI, docs and review process.

Security

62/100

weak

Confidence
85%
Coverage
100%

Secrets, static analysis, vulnerable dependencies, CI and supply-chain posture.

AI provenance

0% explicit

Explicit AI attribution on 0% of first-party code added; an estimated 0% including velocity signals.

How the score is built

  • Explicitly attributed share0%
  • Unattributed share in AI-pace bursts15%
  • Estimated AI-generated share0%
  • AI tool configuration files1
  • Work sessions at AI pace2
  • Releases at AI pace0
  • Coding-style index (1.0+ means possible)0.05

Attributed AI tools

ToolCommitsLines addedFirst seenLast seen
Claude Code4472026-09-082026-09-08

Lines added per month all AI-attributed share

  1. 2021-097,579 · 0% AI
  2. 2021-1033,124 · 0% AI
  3. 2021-111,286 · 0% AI
  4. 2021-122,299 · 0% AI
  5. 2022-012,525 · 0% AI
  6. 2022-021,738 · 0% AI
  7. 2022-03739 · 0% AI
  8. 2022-041,486 · 0% AI
  9. 2022-051,318 · 0% AI
  10. 2022-062,009 · 0% AI
  11. 2022-071,817 · 0% AI
  12. 2022-083,477 · 0% AI
  13. 2022-092,020 · 0% AI
  14. 2022-10564 · 0% AI
  15. 2022-113,034 · 0% AI
  16. 2022-124,693 · 0% AI
  17. 2023-012,245 · 0% AI
  18. 2023-021,282 · 0% AI
  19. 2023-036,103 · 0% AI
  20. 2023-041,954 · 0% AI
  21. 2023-051,083 · 0% AI
  22. 2023-061,899 · 0% AI
  23. 2023-071,800 · 0% AI
  24. 2023-082,849 · 0% AI
  25. 2023-093,482 · 0% AI
  26. 2023-101,877 · 0% AI
  27. 2023-111,084 · 0% AI
  28. 2023-12527 · 0% AI
  29. 2024-01526 · 0% AI
  30. 2024-02409 · 0% AI
  31. 2024-032,145 · 0% AI
  32. 2024-04565 · 0% AI
  33. 2024-05222 · 0% AI
  34. 2024-061,169 · 0% AI
  35. 2024-07963 · 0% AI
  36. 2024-08395 · 0% AI
  37. 2024-091,615 · 0% AI
  38. 2024-10745 · 0% AI
  39. 2024-11664 · 0% AI
  40. 2024-12104 · 0% AI
  41. 2025-0171 · 0% AI
  42. 2025-03189 · 0% AI
  43. 2025-04730 · 0% AI
  44. 2025-051,268 · 0% AI
  45. 2025-06195 · 0% AI
  46. 2025-07268 · 0% AI
  47. 2025-08160 · 0% AI
  48. 2025-091,350 · 0% AI
  49. 2025-10751 · 0% AI
  50. 2025-11677 · 0% AI
  51. 2025-12257 · 0% AI
  52. 2026-01981 · 0% AI
  53. 2026-021,288 · 0% AI
  54. 2026-031,152 · 0% AI
  55. 2026-042,560 · 0% AI
  56. 2026-05662 · 0% AI
  57. 2026-06821 · 0% AI
  58. 2026-07341 · 0% AI
  59. 2026-08731 · 0% AI
  60. 2026-09444 · 11% AI
  61. 2026-102,041 · 0% AI
  62. 2026-11267 · 0% AI

Findings in AI-attributed lines vs the rest

From git blame: 45 lines trace to AI-attributed commits, 37,475 to others. Too few lines in one group for a fair comparison. Reported, not scored.

Findings per 1,000 linesAI-attributedOtherRatio
Code quality0.000.96—
Security0.000.08—

Evidence by analyzer

Explicit AI attributionok5 items
attributed_commit_share
0.2%
attributed_commits
4
attributed_loc
47
attributed_loc_share
0.0%
commits
1,842
effective_loc
122,619
tools_detected
1
AI tool configurationok1 item
artifacts
1
earliest_adoption
2026-10-26
tools_configured
1
workflow_agents
0
Commit velocityok2 items
excluded_import_loc
19,059
flagged_loc
17,829
flagged_loc_share
17.2%
flagged_units
2
max_loc_per_hour
2,974.32
measured_loc
103,560
median_loc_per_hour
55
pr_timed_units
1
pre_ai_era_burst_loc
0
pre_ai_era_bursts
0
pre_ai_era_measured_loc
0
work_units
871
Release velocityok
flagged_releases
0
max_loc_per_day
4,728
releases
99
Coding styleok2 items
count:assistant_voice
0
count:emoji_in_code
0
count:narrated_steps
2
count:placeholder
0
files:assistant_voice
0
files:emoji_in_code
0
files:narrated_steps
2
files:placeholder
0
index
0.05
lines_scanned
37,520
per_kloc:assistant_voice
0
per_kloc:emoji_in_code
0
per_kloc:narrated_steps
0.05
per_kloc:placeholder
0
Findings in AI-written linesok
ai_lines
45
blame_failures
0
files_blamed
178
other_lines
37,475
quality:ai_findings
0
quality:ai_per_kloc
0
quality:other_findings
36
quality:other_per_kloc
0.96
security:ai_findings
0
security:ai_per_kloc
0
security:other_findings
3
security:other_per_kloc
0.08

Code quality

51 weak

Code quality is weak: test-to-source ratio 0.00, no CI test run detected; 26% of function code in complex or long functions; 13% duplicated lines. Weakest area: testing.

How the score is built

  • Complexity45
  • Duplication45
  • Lint and smells74
  • Tests and CI35
  • Documentation85
  • Type safety40
  • Review processnot measured

Evidence by analyzer

Complexity (lizard)ok10 items
complex_functions
40
function_nloc
16,855
functions
1,448
long_functions
17
many_param_functions
5
mean_ccn
3.34
p90_ccn
7
risky_nloc_share
26.4%
Duplication (jscpd)ok10 items
compared_lines
28,003
duplicated_lines
3,699
duplicated_share
13.2%
files
178
Lintok
category:best-practice
12
category:maintainability
24
findings
36
scanned_lines
37,520
weighted_findings
46
Tests and CIok4 items
  • CI config: .github/workflows/delete-old-dev.yml .github/workflows/delete-old-dev.yml
  • CI config: .github/workflows/deploy_documentation.yml .github/workflows/deploy_documentation.yml
  • CI config: .github/workflows/fw_build_dev.yml .github/workflows/fw_build_dev.yml
  • CI config: .github/workflows/fw_build_main.yml .github/workflows/fw_build_main.yml
check:ci_present
yes
check:ci_runs_lint
no
check:ci_runs_tests
no
check:has_tests
yes
check:test_ratio
no
check:tests_cochange
no
ci_files
4
cochange_commits
285
cochange_share
0.7%
source_lines
37,520
test_lines
118
test_ratio
0.00
Documentationok3 items
  • README.md README.md
  • LICENSE LICENSE
  • CHANGELOG.md CHANGELOG.md
check:changelog
yes
check:contributing
no
check:license
yes
check:readme
yes
readme_lines
39
Type safetyok
check:low_escape_density
yes
check:strict_config
no
escapes
0
escapes_per_kloc
0

Security

62 weak

Security posture is weak: 3 high-severity SAST findings; 19 high-severity workflow issues. Weakest area: posture.

How the score is built

  • Secrets94
  • Static analysis (SAST)98
  • Vulnerable dependenciesnot measured
  • CI workflows1
  • Security posture0
  • OpenSSF Scorecardnot measured

Evidence by analyzer

OpenSSF Scorecardskipped

no published OpenSSF Scorecard result for this repo

Package registriesskipped

no registry dependencies declared

Secrets (gitleaks)ok
secrets_current
0
secrets_history
0
secrets_low_confidence
2
secrets_nonprod
0
Static analysis (opengrep)ok
findings
3
findings_high
3
findings_low
0
findings_medium
0
parse_errors
3
scanned_lines
37,520
weighted_findings
2.25
Dependencies (osv-scanner)skipped
CI workflows (zizmor)ok
findings
35
findings_high
19
findings_low
3
findings_medium
13
penalty
259.80
workflows
4
Security postureok
check:dependency_updates
no
check:lockfiles
yes
check:security_policy
no
check:signed_commits
no
signed_commit_share
0.5%
unpinned_manifests
0
Release downloadsok
binary_assets
0
signals
0
suspicious
0

Findings

27 high44 medium3 low2 info

SeverityRuleLocationMessageTool
high opengrep/python.lang.best-practice.open-never-closed lib/convert.py:17 file object opened without corresponding close Lint
high opengrep/python.lang.best-practice.open-never-closed scripts/generate_data.py:26 file object opened without corresponding close Lint
high opengrep/python.lang.best-practice.open-never-closed scripts/generate_data.py:27 file object opened without corresponding close Lint
high opengrep/python.lang.best-practice.open-never-closed scripts/generate_data.py:368 file object opened without corresponding close Lint
high opengrep/python.lang.best-practice.open-never-closed scripts/generate_data.py:369 file object opened without corresponding close Lint
high zizmor/unpinned-uses .github/workflows/delete-old-dev.yml:14 unpinned action reference [confidence high] CI workflows (zizmor)
high zizmor/unpinned-uses .github/workflows/deploy_documentation.yml:14 unpinned action reference [confidence high] CI workflows (zizmor)
high zizmor/unpinned-uses .github/workflows/deploy_documentation.yml:28 unpinned action reference [confidence high] CI workflows (zizmor)
high zizmor/unpinned-uses .github/workflows/fw_build_dev.yml:14 unpinned action reference [confidence high] CI workflows (zizmor)
high zizmor/unpinned-uses .github/workflows/fw_build_dev.yml:18 unpinned action reference [confidence high] CI workflows (zizmor)
high zizmor/unpinned-uses .github/workflows/fw_build_dev.yml:25 unpinned action reference [confidence high] CI workflows (zizmor)
high zizmor/unpinned-uses .github/workflows/fw_build_dev.yml:30 unpinned action reference [confidence high] CI workflows (zizmor)
high zizmor/unpinned-uses .github/workflows/fw_build_dev.yml:39 unpinned action reference [confidence high] CI workflows (zizmor)
high zizmor/unpinned-uses .github/workflows/fw_build_dev.yml:53 unpinned action reference [confidence high] CI workflows (zizmor)
high zizmor/unpinned-uses .github/workflows/fw_build_dev.yml:58 unpinned action reference [confidence high] CI workflows (zizmor)
high zizmor/unpinned-uses .github/workflows/fw_build_dev.yml:68 unpinned action reference [confidence high] CI workflows (zizmor)
high zizmor/unpinned-uses .github/workflows/fw_build_main.yml:14 unpinned action reference [confidence high] CI workflows (zizmor)
high zizmor/unpinned-uses .github/workflows/fw_build_main.yml:18 unpinned action reference [confidence high] CI workflows (zizmor)
high zizmor/unpinned-uses .github/workflows/fw_build_main.yml:25 unpinned action reference [confidence high] CI workflows (zizmor)
high zizmor/unpinned-uses .github/workflows/fw_build_main.yml:30 unpinned action reference [confidence high] CI workflows (zizmor)
high zizmor/unpinned-uses .github/workflows/fw_build_main.yml:39 unpinned action reference [confidence high] CI workflows (zizmor)
high zizmor/unpinned-uses .github/workflows/fw_build_main.yml:53 unpinned action reference [confidence high] CI workflows (zizmor)
high zizmor/unpinned-uses .github/workflows/fw_build_main.yml:60 unpinned action reference [confidence high] CI workflows (zizmor)
high zizmor/unpinned-uses .github/workflows/fw_build_main.yml:70 unpinned action reference [confidence high] CI workflows (zizmor)
high opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.dangerous-subprocess-use-audit patchappinfo.py:125 Detected subprocess function 'check_output' without a static string. If this data can be controlled by a malicious actor, it may be an instance of command injection. Audit the use of this call to ensure it is not controllable by an... Static analysis (opengrep)
high opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.dangerous-subprocess-use-audit patchappinfo.py:147 Detected subprocess function 'check_output' without a static string. If this data can be controlled by a malicious actor, it may be an instance of command injection. Audit the use of this call to ensure it is not controllable by an... Static analysis (opengrep)
high opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.dangerous-subprocess-use-audit progname.py:71 Detected subprocess function 'check_output' without a static string. If this data can be controlled by a malicious actor, it may be an instance of command injection. Audit the use of this call to ensure it is not controllable by an... Static analysis (opengrep)
medium opengrep/python.lang.maintainability.is-function-without-parentheses lib/convert.py:102 Is "is_bool" a function or an attribute? If it is a function, you may have meant self.is_bool() because self.is_bool is always true. Lint
medium opengrep/python.lang.maintainability.is-function-without-parentheses lib/convert.py:103 Is "is_enum" a function or an attribute? If it is a function, you may have meant self.is_enum() because self.is_enum is always true. Lint
medium opengrep/python.lang.maintainability.is-function-without-parentheses lib/convert.py:104 Is "is_iso_tp" a function or an attribute? If it is a function, you may have meant self.is_iso_tp() because self.is_iso_tp is always true. Lint
medium opengrep/python.lang.maintainability.is-function-without-parentheses lib/convert.py:105 Is "is_number" a function or an attribute? If it is a function, you may have meant self.is_number() because self.is_number is always true. Lint
medium opengrep/python.lang.maintainability.is-function-without-parentheses lib/convert.py:108 Is "is_iso_tp" a function or an attribute? If it is a function, you may have meant self.is_iso_tp() because self.is_iso_tp is always true. Lint
medium opengrep/python.lang.maintainability.is-function-without-parentheses lib/convert.py:110 Is "is_char" a function or an attribute? If it is a function, you may have meant self.is_char() because self.is_char is always true. Lint
medium opengrep/python.lang.maintainability.is-function-without-parentheses lib/convert.py:112 Is "is_bool" a function or an attribute? If it is a function, you may have meant self.is_bool() because self.is_bool is always true. Lint
medium opengrep/python.lang.maintainability.is-function-without-parentheses lib/convert.py:114 Is "is_enum" a function or an attribute? If it is a function, you may have meant self.is_enum() because self.is_enum is always true. Lint
medium opengrep/python.lang.maintainability.is-function-without-parentheses lib/convert.py:116 Is "is_number" a function or an attribute? If it is a function, you may have meant self.is_number() because self.is_number is always true. Lint
medium opengrep/python.lang.best-practice.unspecified-open-encoding lib/convert.py:17 Missing 'encoding' parameter. 'open()' uses device locale encodings by default, corrupting files with special characters. Specify the encoding to ensure cross-platform support when opening files in text mode (e.g. encoding="utf-8"). Lint
medium opengrep/python.lang.maintainability.is-function-without-parentheses lib/convert.py:173 Is "is_enum" a function or an attribute? If it is a function, you may have meant s.is_enum() because s.is_enum is always true. Lint
medium opengrep/python.lang.best-practice.unspecified-open-encoding lib/convert.py:350 Missing 'encoding' parameter. 'open()' uses device locale encodings by default, corrupting files with special characters. Specify the encoding to ensure cross-platform support when opening files in text mode (e.g. encoding="utf-8"). Lint
medium opengrep/python.lang.best-practice.unspecified-open-encoding lib/convert.py:398 Missing 'encoding' parameter. 'open()' uses device locale encodings by default, corrupting files with special characters. Specify the encoding to ensure cross-platform support when opening files in text mode (e.g. encoding="utf-8"). Lint
medium opengrep/python.lang.maintainability.is-function-without-parentheses lib/convert.py:44 Is "is_iso_tp" a function or an attribute? If it is a function, you may have meant self.is_iso_tp() because self.is_iso_tp is always true. Lint
medium opengrep/python.lang.maintainability.is-function-without-parentheses lib/convert.py:45 Is "is_number" a function or an attribute? If it is a function, you may have meant self.is_number() because self.is_number is always true. Lint
medium opengrep/python.lang.maintainability.is-function-without-parentheses lib/convert.py:46 Is "is_bool" a function or an attribute? If it is a function, you may have meant self.is_bool() because self.is_bool is always true. Lint
medium opengrep/python.lang.maintainability.is-function-without-parentheses lib/convert.py:47 Is "is_char" a function or an attribute? If it is a function, you may have meant self.is_char() because self.is_char is always true. Lint
medium opengrep/python.lang.maintainability.is-function-without-parentheses lib/convert.py:49 Is "is_enum" a function or an attribute? If it is a function, you may have meant self.is_enum() because self.is_enum is always true. Lint
medium opengrep/python.lang.maintainability.is-function-without-parentheses lib/convert.py:58 Is "is_number" a function or an attribute? If it is a function, you may have meant self.is_number() because self.is_number is always true. Lint
medium opengrep/python.lang.maintainability.is-function-without-parentheses lib/convert.py:67 Is "is_bool" a function or an attribute? If it is a function, you may have meant self.is_bool() because self.is_bool is always true. Lint
medium opengrep/python.lang.maintainability.is-function-without-parentheses lib/convert.py:69 Is "is_enum" a function or an attribute? If it is a function, you may have meant self.is_enum() because self.is_enum is always true. Lint
medium opengrep/python.lang.maintainability.is-function-without-parentheses lib/convert.py:71 Is "is_char" a function or an attribute? If it is a function, you may have meant self.is_char() because self.is_char is always true. Lint
medium opengrep/python.lang.maintainability.is-function-without-parentheses lib/convert.py:77 Is "is_number" a function or an attribute? If it is a function, you may have meant self.is_number() because self.is_number is always true. Lint
medium opengrep/python.lang.maintainability.is-function-without-parentheses lib/convert.py:86 Is "is_bool" a function or an attribute? If it is a function, you may have meant self.is_bool() because self.is_bool is always true. Lint
medium opengrep/python.lang.maintainability.is-function-without-parentheses lib/convert.py:88 Is "is_enum" a function or an attribute? If it is a function, you may have meant self.is_enum() because self.is_enum is always true. Lint
medium opengrep/python.lang.maintainability.is-function-without-parentheses lib/convert.py:90 Is "is_char" a function or an attribute? If it is a function, you may have meant self.is_char() because self.is_char is always true. Lint
medium opengrep/python.lang.maintainability.is-function-without-parentheses patchappinfo.py:378 Is "is_hashed" a function or an attribute? If it is a function, you may have meant img.is_hashed() because img.is_hashed is always true. Lint
medium opengrep/python.lang.best-practice.unspecified-open-encoding scripts/generate_data.py:211 Missing 'encoding' parameter. 'open()' uses device locale encodings by default, corrupting files with special characters. Specify the encoding to ensure cross-platform support when opening files in text mode (e.g. encoding="utf-8"). Lint
medium opengrep/python.lang.best-practice.unspecified-open-encoding scripts/generate_data.py:212 Missing 'encoding' parameter. 'open()' uses device locale encodings by default, corrupting files with special characters. Specify the encoding to ensure cross-platform support when opening files in text mode (e.g. encoding="utf-8"). Lint
medium opengrep/python.lang.best-practice.unspecified-open-encoding scripts/generate_data.py:26 Missing 'encoding' parameter. 'open()' uses device locale encodings by default, corrupting files with special characters. Specify the encoding to ensure cross-platform support when opening files in text mode (e.g. encoding="utf-8"). Lint
medium opengrep/python.lang.best-practice.unspecified-open-encoding scripts/generate_data.py:27 Missing 'encoding' parameter. 'open()' uses device locale encodings by default, corrupting files with special characters. Specify the encoding to ensure cross-platform support when opening files in text mode (e.g. encoding="utf-8"). Lint
medium zizmor/excessive-permissions .github/workflows/delete-old-dev.yml:11 overly broad permissions [confidence medium] CI workflows (zizmor)
medium zizmor/excessive-permissions .github/workflows/deploy_documentation.yml:11 overly broad permissions [confidence medium] CI workflows (zizmor)
medium zizmor/artipacked .github/workflows/deploy_documentation.yml:14 credential persistence through GitHub Actions artifacts [confidence low] CI workflows (zizmor)
medium zizmor/excessive-permissions .github/workflows/fw_build_dev.yml:1 overly broad permissions [confidence medium] CI workflows (zizmor)
medium zizmor/excessive-permissions .github/workflows/fw_build_dev.yml:11 overly broad permissions [confidence medium] CI workflows (zizmor)
medium zizmor/artipacked .github/workflows/fw_build_dev.yml:14 credential persistence through GitHub Actions artifacts [confidence low] CI workflows (zizmor)
medium zizmor/excessive-permissions .github/workflows/fw_build_dev.yml:48 overly broad permissions [confidence medium] CI workflows (zizmor)
medium zizmor/archived-uses .github/workflows/fw_build_dev.yml:58 action or reusable workflow from archived repository [confidence high] CI workflows (zizmor)
medium zizmor/excessive-permissions .github/workflows/fw_build_main.yml:1 overly broad permissions [confidence medium] CI workflows (zizmor)
medium zizmor/excessive-permissions .github/workflows/fw_build_main.yml:11 overly broad permissions [confidence medium] CI workflows (zizmor)
medium zizmor/artipacked .github/workflows/fw_build_main.yml:14 credential persistence through GitHub Actions artifacts [confidence low] CI workflows (zizmor)
medium zizmor/excessive-permissions .github/workflows/fw_build_main.yml:48 overly broad permissions [confidence medium] CI workflows (zizmor)
medium zizmor/archived-uses .github/workflows/fw_build_main.yml:60 action or reusable workflow from archived repository [confidence high] CI workflows (zizmor)
low zizmor/template-injection .github/workflows/deploy_documentation.yml:26 code injection via template expansion [confidence high] CI workflows (zizmor)
low gitleaks/generic-api-key sdkconfig.unified.old:1377 Possible generic-api-key secret in history (commit 7302e00470); removed from the current tree but still retrievable Secrets (gitleaks)
low gitleaks/generic-api-key sdkconfig.unified:1415 Possible generic-api-key secret in history (commit a0f4b271f8); removed from the current tree but still retrievable Secrets (gitleaks)
info zizmor/superfluous-actions .github/workflows/fw_build_dev.yml:68 action functionality is already included by the runner [confidence high] CI workflows (zizmor)
info zizmor/superfluous-actions .github/workflows/fw_build_main.yml:70 action functionality is already included by the runner [confidence high] CI workflows (zizmor)

Tools and coverage

Every analyzer that ran on this commit. A failed or skipped tool is a coverage gap: its share of the score is left out and the coverage figure drops.

AnalyzerPillarStatusVersionFindingsNote
AI tool configurationAI provenanceoksignatures-v10
Explicit AI attributionAI provenanceoksignatures-v10
Release velocityAI provenanceokprov-40
Coding styleAI provenanceok—0
Commit velocityAI provenanceokprov-40
Findings in AI-written linesAI provenanceokgit-blame0
Complexity (lizard)Code qualityoklizard 1.25.10
DocumentationCode qualityok—0
Duplication (jscpd)Code qualityokrepotrust-dup-w60
LintCode qualityokopengrep 1.33.1; rules f1d2b562b41436
Tests and CICode qualityok—0
Type safetyCode qualityok—0
CI workflows (zizmor)Securityokzizmor 1.32.035
Dependencies (osv-scanner)Securityskipped—0
Release downloadsSecurityok—0
Security postureSecurityok—0
Package registriesSecurityskipped—0no registry dependencies declared
Static analysis (opengrep)Securityokopengrep 1.33.1; rules f1d2b562b4143
OpenSSF ScorecardSecurityskipped—0no published OpenSSF Scorecard result for this repo
Secrets (gitleaks)Securityokgitleaks 8.30.12

Score history

Scores from different scoring versions aren't directly comparable.

ScoredCommitScoringAI provenanceQualitySecurity
2026-11-14ed602818dc08prov-5+qual-2+sec-20%5162
2026-11-14ed602818dc08prov-4+qual-2+sec-20%5162

Embed a badge

Maintainers can show these in a README. Badges update when the repository is re-scored.

[![RepoTrust ai](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/badge/github.com/rnd-ash/ultimate-nag52-fw/ai.svg)](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/r/github.com/rnd-ash/ultimate-nag52-fw/)
[![RepoTrust quality](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/badge/github.com/rnd-ash/ultimate-nag52-fw/quality.svg)](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/r/github.com/rnd-ash/ultimate-nag52-fw/)
[![RepoTrust security](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/badge/github.com/rnd-ash/ultimate-nag52-fw/security.svg)](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/r/github.com/rnd-ash/ultimate-nag52-fw/)
Full text report

Scores

Pillar Score Signal Confidence Coverage
AI provenance (estimated AI-generated share) 0 explicit 95% 100%
Code quality 51 weak 90% 100%
Security 62 weak 85% 100%

AI provenance

Explicit AI attribution on 0% of first-party code added; an estimated 0% including velocity signals.

  • Explicitly attributed share (lower bound): 0.0%
  • Unattributed share in AI-consistent velocity bursts: 14.5%
  • Estimated AI-generated share: 0.0%
AI tool Attributed commits Lines added
Claude Code 4 47
  • AI tooling configured in repo: generic-agent

Current source lines last changed by AI-attributed commits: 45 of 37,520.

Too few lines in one group to compare finding densities.

  • Stylometry index: 0.05 per 1,000 lines (narrated steps 2, placeholders 0, assistant phrasing 0, emoji 0). Reported as a signal, not scored.
Month Lines added Attributed to AI
2025-12 257 0%
2026-01 981 0%
2026-02 1,288 0%
2026-03 1,152 0%
2026-04 2,560 0%
2026-05 662 0%
2026-06 821 0%
2026-07 341 0%
2026-08 731 0%
2026-09 444 11%
2026-10 2,041 0%
2026-11 267 0%

Evidence

  • Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (ca36791f1742)
  • Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (4e9208cfcd4a)
  • Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (9319a83794f9)
  • Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (55d4ecca4bb9)
  • 12,260 lines of first-party code in ~4.1h (2,974 lines/hour, 2 commit session) (34877d27e0b6)
  • 5,569 lines of first-party code in ~3.1h (1,770 lines/hour, 1 commit session) (de37a33c829d)
  • AGENTS.md (generic-agent configuration) (AGENTS.md)
  • step-by-step narration comment: // Step 1. Aquire ALL Sensors (src/gearbox.)
  • step-by-step narration comment: // Now we are FAR too late, so we must increase pressure (src/shifting)

AI provenance describes how code was produced; it is not a quality judgment. Unless attribution is explicit, these are signals consistent with AI generation, not proof. Squash/rebase workflows, imported code, and rewritten history reduce accuracy.

Code quality

Code quality is weak: test-to-source ratio 0.00, no CI test run detected; 26% of function code in complex or long functions; 13% duplicated lines. Weakest area: testing.

Area Score
Complexity (lizard) 45
Duplication 45
Code smells (Opengrep) 74
Tests and CI 35
Documentation 85
Type safety 40
Process (Scorecard review/maintenance) n/a
  • Functions: 1,448; mean complexity 3.3, 90th percentile 7; 40 complex and 17 long functions
  • Duplicated lines: 13.2% of 28,003 compared
  • Tests: 118 test lines for 37,520 source lines (ratio 0.00); CI test commands: none detected; 1% of recent source commits also change tests
  • Docs missing or thin: contributing

Most complex functions:

Security

Security posture is weak: 3 high-severity SAST findings; 19 high-severity workflow issues. Weakest area: posture.

Area Score
Secrets (gitleaks, tree + history) 94
Static analysis (Opengrep) 98
Vulnerable dependencies (OSV) n/a
CI workflows (zizmor) 1
Posture (policy, updates, signing, lockfiles) 0
OpenSSF Scorecard n/a
  • Posture checks passed: lockfiles; missing: security policy, dependency updates, signed commits

Top findings

Severity Finding Location
high opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.dangerous-subprocess-use-audit: Detected subprocess function 'check_output' without a static string. If this data can be controlled by a malicious actor, it may be an instance of command injection. Audit the use of this call to ensure it is not controllable by an external resource. You may consider using 'shlex.escape()'. [confidence low] patchappinfo.py:125
high opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.dangerous-subprocess-use-audit: Detected subprocess function 'check_output' without a static string. If this data can be controlled by a malicious actor, it may be an instance of command injection. Audit the use of this call to ensure it is not controllable by an external resource. You may consider using 'shlex.escape()'. [confidence low] patchappinfo.py:147
high opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.dangerous-subprocess-use-audit: Detected subprocess function 'check_output' without a static string. If this data can be controlled by a malicious actor, it may be an instance of command injection. Audit the use of this call to ensure it is not controllable by an external resource. You may consider using 'shlex.escape()'. [confidence low] progname.py:71
high zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] .github/workflows/delete-old-dev.yml:14
high zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] .github/workflows/deploy_documentation.yml:14
high zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] .github/workflows/deploy_documentation.yml:28
high zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] .github/workflows/fw_build_dev.yml:14
high zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] .github/workflows/fw_build_dev.yml:18
high zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] .github/workflows/fw_build_dev.yml:25
high zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] .github/workflows/fw_build_dev.yml:30
high zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] .github/workflows/fw_build_dev.yml:39
high zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] .github/workflows/fw_build_dev.yml:53
high zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] .github/workflows/fw_build_dev.yml:58
high zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] .github/workflows/fw_build_dev.yml:68
high zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] .github/workflows/fw_build_main.yml:14
high zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] .github/workflows/fw_build_main.yml:18
high zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] .github/workflows/fw_build_main.yml:25
high zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] .github/workflows/fw_build_main.yml:30
high zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] .github/workflows/fw_build_main.yml:39
high zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] .github/workflows/fw_build_main.yml:53
high zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] .github/workflows/fw_build_main.yml:60
high zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] .github/workflows/fw_build_main.yml:70
medium zizmor/excessive-permissions: overly broad permissions [confidence medium] .github/workflows/delete-old-dev.yml:11
medium zizmor/artipacked: credential persistence through GitHub Actions artifacts [confidence low] .github/workflows/deploy_documentation.yml:14
medium zizmor/excessive-permissions: overly broad permissions [confidence medium] .github/workflows/deploy_documentation.yml:11

Static signals only: the scorer never runs the project's code. Secret findings are pattern matches that were not verified, and secret values are never stored.

Repository profile

  • Source lines: 37,520; test lines: 118
Language Lines
C 18,685
C++ 17,623
Python 1,322
Shell 8