Leaderboard github.com
rnd-ash/ultimate-nag52-fw
Ultimate NAG52 firmware repository
AI provenance
0%
explicit
- Confidence
- 95%
- Coverage
- 100%
Estimated share of AI-generated code. Explicit attribution is a lower bound.
Code quality
51/100
weak
- Confidence
- 90%
- Coverage
- 100%
Complexity, duplication, lint density, tests, CI, docs and review process.
Security
62/100
weak
- Confidence
- 85%
- Coverage
- 100%
Secrets, static analysis, vulnerable dependencies, CI and supply-chain posture.
AI provenance
0% explicit
Explicit AI attribution on 0% of first-party code added; an estimated 0% including velocity signals.
How the score is built
- Explicitly attributed share0%
- Unattributed share in AI-pace bursts15%
- Estimated AI-generated share0%
- AI tool configuration files1
- Work sessions at AI pace2
- Releases at AI pace0
- Coding-style index (1.0+ means possible)0.05
Attributed AI tools
| Tool | Commits | Lines added | First seen | Last seen |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Code | 4 | 47 | 2026-09-08 | 2026-09-08 |
Lines added per month all AI-attributed share
- 2021-097,579 · 0% AI
- 2021-1033,124 · 0% AI
- 2021-111,286 · 0% AI
- 2021-122,299 · 0% AI
- 2022-012,525 · 0% AI
- 2022-021,738 · 0% AI
- 2022-03739 · 0% AI
- 2022-041,486 · 0% AI
- 2022-051,318 · 0% AI
- 2022-062,009 · 0% AI
- 2022-071,817 · 0% AI
- 2022-083,477 · 0% AI
- 2022-092,020 · 0% AI
- 2022-10564 · 0% AI
- 2022-113,034 · 0% AI
- 2022-124,693 · 0% AI
- 2023-012,245 · 0% AI
- 2023-021,282 · 0% AI
- 2023-036,103 · 0% AI
- 2023-041,954 · 0% AI
- 2023-051,083 · 0% AI
- 2023-061,899 · 0% AI
- 2023-071,800 · 0% AI
- 2023-082,849 · 0% AI
- 2023-093,482 · 0% AI
- 2023-101,877 · 0% AI
- 2023-111,084 · 0% AI
- 2023-12527 · 0% AI
- 2024-01526 · 0% AI
- 2024-02409 · 0% AI
- 2024-032,145 · 0% AI
- 2024-04565 · 0% AI
- 2024-05222 · 0% AI
- 2024-061,169 · 0% AI
- 2024-07963 · 0% AI
- 2024-08395 · 0% AI
- 2024-091,615 · 0% AI
- 2024-10745 · 0% AI
- 2024-11664 · 0% AI
- 2024-12104 · 0% AI
- 2025-0171 · 0% AI
- 2025-03189 · 0% AI
- 2025-04730 · 0% AI
- 2025-051,268 · 0% AI
- 2025-06195 · 0% AI
- 2025-07268 · 0% AI
- 2025-08160 · 0% AI
- 2025-091,350 · 0% AI
- 2025-10751 · 0% AI
- 2025-11677 · 0% AI
- 2025-12257 · 0% AI
- 2026-01981 · 0% AI
- 2026-021,288 · 0% AI
- 2026-031,152 · 0% AI
- 2026-042,560 · 0% AI
- 2026-05662 · 0% AI
- 2026-06821 · 0% AI
- 2026-07341 · 0% AI
- 2026-08731 · 0% AI
- 2026-09444 · 11% AI
- 2026-102,041 · 0% AI
- 2026-11267 · 0% AI
Findings in AI-attributed lines vs the rest
From git blame: 45 lines trace to AI-attributed commits, 37,475 to others. Too few lines in one group for a fair comparison. Reported, not scored.
| Findings per 1,000 lines | AI-attributed | Other | Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|
| Code quality | 0.00 | 0.96 | — |
| Security | 0.00 | 0.08 | — |
Evidence by analyzer
Explicit AI attributionok5 items
- Claude Code: 4 attributed commits, 47 lines added
- Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude'
- Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude'
- Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude'
- Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude'
- attributed_commit_share
- 0.2%
- attributed_commits
- 4
- attributed_loc
- 47
- attributed_loc_share
- 0.0%
- commits
- 1,842
- effective_loc
- 122,619
- tools_detected
- 1
AI tool configurationok1 item
- artifacts
- 1
- earliest_adoption
- 2026-10-26
- tools_configured
- 1
- workflow_agents
- 0
Commit velocityok2 items
- 12,260 lines of first-party code in ~4.1h (2,974 lines/hour, 2 commit session)
- 5,569 lines of first-party code in ~3.1h (1,770 lines/hour, 1 commit session)
- excluded_import_loc
- 19,059
- flagged_loc
- 17,829
- flagged_loc_share
- 17.2%
- flagged_units
- 2
- max_loc_per_hour
- 2,974.32
- measured_loc
- 103,560
- median_loc_per_hour
- 55
- pr_timed_units
- 1
- pre_ai_era_burst_loc
- 0
- pre_ai_era_bursts
- 0
- pre_ai_era_measured_loc
- 0
- work_units
- 871
Release velocityok
- flagged_releases
- 0
- max_loc_per_day
- 4,728
- releases
- 99
Coding styleok2 items
- step-by-step narration comment: // Step 1. Aquire ALL Sensors
- step-by-step narration comment: // Now we are FAR too late, so we must increase pressure
- count:assistant_voice
- 0
- count:emoji_in_code
- 0
- count:narrated_steps
- 2
- count:placeholder
- 0
- files:assistant_voice
- 0
- files:emoji_in_code
- 0
- files:narrated_steps
- 2
- files:placeholder
- 0
- index
- 0.05
- lines_scanned
- 37,520
- per_kloc:assistant_voice
- 0
- per_kloc:emoji_in_code
- 0
- per_kloc:narrated_steps
- 0.05
- per_kloc:placeholder
- 0
Findings in AI-written linesok
- ai_lines
- 45
- blame_failures
- 0
- files_blamed
- 178
- other_lines
- 37,475
- quality:ai_findings
- 0
- quality:ai_per_kloc
- 0
- quality:other_findings
- 36
- quality:other_per_kloc
- 0.96
- security:ai_findings
- 0
- security:ai_per_kloc
- 0
- security:other_findings
- 3
- security:other_per_kloc
- 0.08
Code quality
51 weak
Code quality is weak: test-to-source ratio 0.00, no CI test run detected; 26% of function code in complex or long functions; 13% duplicated lines. Weakest area: testing.
How the score is built
- Complexity45
- Duplication45
- Lint and smells74
- Tests and CI35
- Documentation85
- Type safety40
- Review processnot measured
Evidence by analyzer
Complexity (lizard)ok10 items
- Gearbox::controller_loop in src/gearbox.cpp: complexity 158, 558 lines
- Gearbox::shift_thread in src/gearbox.cpp: complexity 92, 402 lines
- ShiftingAlgorithm::adaptation_step in src/shifting_algo/s_algo.cpp: complexity 72, 188 lines
- TorqueConverter::process_open_or_slip_state in src/torque_converter.cpp: complexity 59, 148 lines
- Kwp2000_server::process_read_data_local_ident in src/diag/kwp2000.cpp: complexity 48, 162 lines
- get_map in src/diag/map_editor.cpp: complexity 47, 83 lines
- ClutchSpeedModel::get_clutch_speeds_debug in src/models/clutch_speed.cpp: complexity 41, 134 lines
- Kwp2000_server::server_loop in src/diag/kwp2000.cpp: complexity 40, 122 lines
- Gearbox::elapse_shift in src/gearbox.cpp: complexity 37, 214 lines
- CrossoverShift::phase_fill in src/shifting_algo/shift_crossover.cpp: complexity 36, 123 lines
- complex_functions
- 40
- function_nloc
- 16,855
- functions
- 1,448
- long_functions
- 17
- many_param_functions
- 5
- mean_ccn
- 3.34
- p90_ccn
- 7
- risky_nloc_share
- 26.4%
Duplication (jscpd)ok10 items
- 6+ duplicated lines: lib/convert.py:59 and lib/convert.py:78
- 6+ duplicated lines: lib/convert.py:273 and lib/customcan_ecus/src/BRAKES.h:22
- 6+ duplicated lines: lib/customcan_ecus/src/BRAKES.h:20 and lib/customcan_ecus/src/ENGINE.h:64
- 6+ duplicated lines: lib/customcan_ecus/src/ENGINE.h:80 and lib/customcan_ecus/src/UN52.h:142
- 6+ duplicated lines: lib/customcan_ecus/src/ENGINE.h:81 and lib/customcan_ecus/src/EWM.h:72
- 6+ duplicated lines: lib/customcan_ecus/src/EWM.h:20 and lib/egs51_ecus/src/EWM51.h:20
- 6+ duplicated lines: lib/customcan_ecus/src/EWM.h:57 and lib/egs52_ecus/src/EWM.h:57
- 6+ duplicated lines: lib/customcan_ecus/src/EWM.h:71 and lib/customcan_ecus/src/WHEELS.h:55
- 6+ duplicated lines: lib/customcan_ecus/src/UN52.h:21 and lib/customcan_ecus/src/UN52.h:40
- 6+ duplicated lines: lib/customcan_ecus/src/WHEELS.h:20 and lib/egs51_ecus/src/GS51.h:106
- compared_lines
- 28,003
- duplicated_lines
- 3,699
- duplicated_share
- 13.2%
- files
- 178
Lintok
- category:best-practice
- 12
- category:maintainability
- 24
- findings
- 36
- scanned_lines
- 37,520
- weighted_findings
- 46
Tests and CIok4 items
- CI config: .github/workflows/delete-old-dev.yml
.github/workflows/delete-old-dev.yml - CI config: .github/workflows/deploy_documentation.yml
.github/workflows/deploy_documentation.yml - CI config: .github/workflows/fw_build_dev.yml
.github/workflows/fw_build_dev.yml - CI config: .github/workflows/fw_build_main.yml
.github/workflows/fw_build_main.yml
- check:ci_present
- yes
- check:ci_runs_lint
- no
- check:ci_runs_tests
- no
- check:has_tests
- yes
- check:test_ratio
- no
- check:tests_cochange
- no
- ci_files
- 4
- cochange_commits
- 285
- cochange_share
- 0.7%
- source_lines
- 37,520
- test_lines
- 118
- test_ratio
- 0.00
Documentationok3 items
- README.md
README.md - LICENSE
LICENSE - CHANGELOG.md
CHANGELOG.md
- check:changelog
- yes
- check:contributing
- no
- check:license
- yes
- check:readme
- yes
- readme_lines
- 39
Type safetyok
- check:low_escape_density
- yes
- check:strict_config
- no
- escapes
- 0
- escapes_per_kloc
- 0
Security
62 weak
Security posture is weak: 3 high-severity SAST findings; 19 high-severity workflow issues. Weakest area: posture.
How the score is built
- Secrets94
- Static analysis (SAST)98
- Vulnerable dependenciesnot measured
- CI workflows1
- Security posture0
- OpenSSF Scorecardnot measured
Evidence by analyzer
OpenSSF Scorecardskipped
no published OpenSSF Scorecard result for this repo
Package registriesskipped
no registry dependencies declared
Secrets (gitleaks)ok
- secrets_current
- 0
- secrets_history
- 0
- secrets_low_confidence
- 2
- secrets_nonprod
- 0
Static analysis (opengrep)ok
- findings
- 3
- findings_high
- 3
- findings_low
- 0
- findings_medium
- 0
- parse_errors
- 3
- scanned_lines
- 37,520
- weighted_findings
- 2.25
Dependencies (osv-scanner)skipped
CI workflows (zizmor)ok
- findings
- 35
- findings_high
- 19
- findings_low
- 3
- findings_medium
- 13
- penalty
- 259.80
- workflows
- 4
Security postureok
- check:dependency_updates
- no
- check:lockfiles
- yes
- check:security_policy
- no
- check:signed_commits
- no
- signed_commit_share
- 0.5%
- unpinned_manifests
- 0
Release downloadsok
- binary_assets
- 0
- signals
- 0
- suspicious
- 0
Findings
27 high44 medium3 low2 info
| Severity | Rule | Location | Message | Tool |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| high | opengrep/python.lang.best-practice.open-never-closed |
lib/convert.py:17 | file object opened without corresponding close | Lint |
| high | opengrep/python.lang.best-practice.open-never-closed |
scripts/generate_data.py:26 | file object opened without corresponding close | Lint |
| high | opengrep/python.lang.best-practice.open-never-closed |
scripts/generate_data.py:27 | file object opened without corresponding close | Lint |
| high | opengrep/python.lang.best-practice.open-never-closed |
scripts/generate_data.py:368 | file object opened without corresponding close | Lint |
| high | opengrep/python.lang.best-practice.open-never-closed |
scripts/generate_data.py:369 | file object opened without corresponding close | Lint |
| high | zizmor/unpinned-uses |
.github/workflows/delete-old-dev.yml:14 | unpinned action reference [confidence high] | CI workflows (zizmor) |
| high | zizmor/unpinned-uses |
.github/workflows/deploy_documentation.yml:14 | unpinned action reference [confidence high] | CI workflows (zizmor) |
| high | zizmor/unpinned-uses |
.github/workflows/deploy_documentation.yml:28 | unpinned action reference [confidence high] | CI workflows (zizmor) |
| high | zizmor/unpinned-uses |
.github/workflows/fw_build_dev.yml:14 | unpinned action reference [confidence high] | CI workflows (zizmor) |
| high | zizmor/unpinned-uses |
.github/workflows/fw_build_dev.yml:18 | unpinned action reference [confidence high] | CI workflows (zizmor) |
| high | zizmor/unpinned-uses |
.github/workflows/fw_build_dev.yml:25 | unpinned action reference [confidence high] | CI workflows (zizmor) |
| high | zizmor/unpinned-uses |
.github/workflows/fw_build_dev.yml:30 | unpinned action reference [confidence high] | CI workflows (zizmor) |
| high | zizmor/unpinned-uses |
.github/workflows/fw_build_dev.yml:39 | unpinned action reference [confidence high] | CI workflows (zizmor) |
| high | zizmor/unpinned-uses |
.github/workflows/fw_build_dev.yml:53 | unpinned action reference [confidence high] | CI workflows (zizmor) |
| high | zizmor/unpinned-uses |
.github/workflows/fw_build_dev.yml:58 | unpinned action reference [confidence high] | CI workflows (zizmor) |
| high | zizmor/unpinned-uses |
.github/workflows/fw_build_dev.yml:68 | unpinned action reference [confidence high] | CI workflows (zizmor) |
| high | zizmor/unpinned-uses |
.github/workflows/fw_build_main.yml:14 | unpinned action reference [confidence high] | CI workflows (zizmor) |
| high | zizmor/unpinned-uses |
.github/workflows/fw_build_main.yml:18 | unpinned action reference [confidence high] | CI workflows (zizmor) |
| high | zizmor/unpinned-uses |
.github/workflows/fw_build_main.yml:25 | unpinned action reference [confidence high] | CI workflows (zizmor) |
| high | zizmor/unpinned-uses |
.github/workflows/fw_build_main.yml:30 | unpinned action reference [confidence high] | CI workflows (zizmor) |
| high | zizmor/unpinned-uses |
.github/workflows/fw_build_main.yml:39 | unpinned action reference [confidence high] | CI workflows (zizmor) |
| high | zizmor/unpinned-uses |
.github/workflows/fw_build_main.yml:53 | unpinned action reference [confidence high] | CI workflows (zizmor) |
| high | zizmor/unpinned-uses |
.github/workflows/fw_build_main.yml:60 | unpinned action reference [confidence high] | CI workflows (zizmor) |
| high | zizmor/unpinned-uses |
.github/workflows/fw_build_main.yml:70 | unpinned action reference [confidence high] | CI workflows (zizmor) |
| high | opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.dangerous-subprocess-use-audit |
patchappinfo.py:125 | Detected subprocess function 'check_output' without a static string. If this data can be controlled by a malicious actor, it may be an instance of command injection. Audit the use of this call to ensure it is not controllable by an... | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| high | opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.dangerous-subprocess-use-audit |
patchappinfo.py:147 | Detected subprocess function 'check_output' without a static string. If this data can be controlled by a malicious actor, it may be an instance of command injection. Audit the use of this call to ensure it is not controllable by an... | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| high | opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.dangerous-subprocess-use-audit |
progname.py:71 | Detected subprocess function 'check_output' without a static string. If this data can be controlled by a malicious actor, it may be an instance of command injection. Audit the use of this call to ensure it is not controllable by an... | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| medium | opengrep/python.lang.maintainability.is-function-without-parentheses |
lib/convert.py:102 | Is "is_bool" a function or an attribute? If it is a function, you may have meant self.is_bool() because self.is_bool is always true. | Lint |
| medium | opengrep/python.lang.maintainability.is-function-without-parentheses |
lib/convert.py:103 | Is "is_enum" a function or an attribute? If it is a function, you may have meant self.is_enum() because self.is_enum is always true. | Lint |
| medium | opengrep/python.lang.maintainability.is-function-without-parentheses |
lib/convert.py:104 | Is "is_iso_tp" a function or an attribute? If it is a function, you may have meant self.is_iso_tp() because self.is_iso_tp is always true. | Lint |
| medium | opengrep/python.lang.maintainability.is-function-without-parentheses |
lib/convert.py:105 | Is "is_number" a function or an attribute? If it is a function, you may have meant self.is_number() because self.is_number is always true. | Lint |
| medium | opengrep/python.lang.maintainability.is-function-without-parentheses |
lib/convert.py:108 | Is "is_iso_tp" a function or an attribute? If it is a function, you may have meant self.is_iso_tp() because self.is_iso_tp is always true. | Lint |
| medium | opengrep/python.lang.maintainability.is-function-without-parentheses |
lib/convert.py:110 | Is "is_char" a function or an attribute? If it is a function, you may have meant self.is_char() because self.is_char is always true. | Lint |
| medium | opengrep/python.lang.maintainability.is-function-without-parentheses |
lib/convert.py:112 | Is "is_bool" a function or an attribute? If it is a function, you may have meant self.is_bool() because self.is_bool is always true. | Lint |
| medium | opengrep/python.lang.maintainability.is-function-without-parentheses |
lib/convert.py:114 | Is "is_enum" a function or an attribute? If it is a function, you may have meant self.is_enum() because self.is_enum is always true. | Lint |
| medium | opengrep/python.lang.maintainability.is-function-without-parentheses |
lib/convert.py:116 | Is "is_number" a function or an attribute? If it is a function, you may have meant self.is_number() because self.is_number is always true. | Lint |
| medium | opengrep/python.lang.best-practice.unspecified-open-encoding |
lib/convert.py:17 | Missing 'encoding' parameter. 'open()' uses device locale encodings by default, corrupting files with special characters. Specify the encoding to ensure cross-platform support when opening files in text mode (e.g. encoding="utf-8"). | Lint |
| medium | opengrep/python.lang.maintainability.is-function-without-parentheses |
lib/convert.py:173 | Is "is_enum" a function or an attribute? If it is a function, you may have meant s.is_enum() because s.is_enum is always true. | Lint |
| medium | opengrep/python.lang.best-practice.unspecified-open-encoding |
lib/convert.py:350 | Missing 'encoding' parameter. 'open()' uses device locale encodings by default, corrupting files with special characters. Specify the encoding to ensure cross-platform support when opening files in text mode (e.g. encoding="utf-8"). | Lint |
| medium | opengrep/python.lang.best-practice.unspecified-open-encoding |
lib/convert.py:398 | Missing 'encoding' parameter. 'open()' uses device locale encodings by default, corrupting files with special characters. Specify the encoding to ensure cross-platform support when opening files in text mode (e.g. encoding="utf-8"). | Lint |
| medium | opengrep/python.lang.maintainability.is-function-without-parentheses |
lib/convert.py:44 | Is "is_iso_tp" a function or an attribute? If it is a function, you may have meant self.is_iso_tp() because self.is_iso_tp is always true. | Lint |
| medium | opengrep/python.lang.maintainability.is-function-without-parentheses |
lib/convert.py:45 | Is "is_number" a function or an attribute? If it is a function, you may have meant self.is_number() because self.is_number is always true. | Lint |
| medium | opengrep/python.lang.maintainability.is-function-without-parentheses |
lib/convert.py:46 | Is "is_bool" a function or an attribute? If it is a function, you may have meant self.is_bool() because self.is_bool is always true. | Lint |
| medium | opengrep/python.lang.maintainability.is-function-without-parentheses |
lib/convert.py:47 | Is "is_char" a function or an attribute? If it is a function, you may have meant self.is_char() because self.is_char is always true. | Lint |
| medium | opengrep/python.lang.maintainability.is-function-without-parentheses |
lib/convert.py:49 | Is "is_enum" a function or an attribute? If it is a function, you may have meant self.is_enum() because self.is_enum is always true. | Lint |
| medium | opengrep/python.lang.maintainability.is-function-without-parentheses |
lib/convert.py:58 | Is "is_number" a function or an attribute? If it is a function, you may have meant self.is_number() because self.is_number is always true. | Lint |
| medium | opengrep/python.lang.maintainability.is-function-without-parentheses |
lib/convert.py:67 | Is "is_bool" a function or an attribute? If it is a function, you may have meant self.is_bool() because self.is_bool is always true. | Lint |
| medium | opengrep/python.lang.maintainability.is-function-without-parentheses |
lib/convert.py:69 | Is "is_enum" a function or an attribute? If it is a function, you may have meant self.is_enum() because self.is_enum is always true. | Lint |
| medium | opengrep/python.lang.maintainability.is-function-without-parentheses |
lib/convert.py:71 | Is "is_char" a function or an attribute? If it is a function, you may have meant self.is_char() because self.is_char is always true. | Lint |
| medium | opengrep/python.lang.maintainability.is-function-without-parentheses |
lib/convert.py:77 | Is "is_number" a function or an attribute? If it is a function, you may have meant self.is_number() because self.is_number is always true. | Lint |
| medium | opengrep/python.lang.maintainability.is-function-without-parentheses |
lib/convert.py:86 | Is "is_bool" a function or an attribute? If it is a function, you may have meant self.is_bool() because self.is_bool is always true. | Lint |
| medium | opengrep/python.lang.maintainability.is-function-without-parentheses |
lib/convert.py:88 | Is "is_enum" a function or an attribute? If it is a function, you may have meant self.is_enum() because self.is_enum is always true. | Lint |
| medium | opengrep/python.lang.maintainability.is-function-without-parentheses |
lib/convert.py:90 | Is "is_char" a function or an attribute? If it is a function, you may have meant self.is_char() because self.is_char is always true. | Lint |
| medium | opengrep/python.lang.maintainability.is-function-without-parentheses |
patchappinfo.py:378 | Is "is_hashed" a function or an attribute? If it is a function, you may have meant img.is_hashed() because img.is_hashed is always true. | Lint |
| medium | opengrep/python.lang.best-practice.unspecified-open-encoding |
scripts/generate_data.py:211 | Missing 'encoding' parameter. 'open()' uses device locale encodings by default, corrupting files with special characters. Specify the encoding to ensure cross-platform support when opening files in text mode (e.g. encoding="utf-8"). | Lint |
| medium | opengrep/python.lang.best-practice.unspecified-open-encoding |
scripts/generate_data.py:212 | Missing 'encoding' parameter. 'open()' uses device locale encodings by default, corrupting files with special characters. Specify the encoding to ensure cross-platform support when opening files in text mode (e.g. encoding="utf-8"). | Lint |
| medium | opengrep/python.lang.best-practice.unspecified-open-encoding |
scripts/generate_data.py:26 | Missing 'encoding' parameter. 'open()' uses device locale encodings by default, corrupting files with special characters. Specify the encoding to ensure cross-platform support when opening files in text mode (e.g. encoding="utf-8"). | Lint |
| medium | opengrep/python.lang.best-practice.unspecified-open-encoding |
scripts/generate_data.py:27 | Missing 'encoding' parameter. 'open()' uses device locale encodings by default, corrupting files with special characters. Specify the encoding to ensure cross-platform support when opening files in text mode (e.g. encoding="utf-8"). | Lint |
| medium | zizmor/excessive-permissions |
.github/workflows/delete-old-dev.yml:11 | overly broad permissions [confidence medium] | CI workflows (zizmor) |
| medium | zizmor/excessive-permissions |
.github/workflows/deploy_documentation.yml:11 | overly broad permissions [confidence medium] | CI workflows (zizmor) |
| medium | zizmor/artipacked |
.github/workflows/deploy_documentation.yml:14 | credential persistence through GitHub Actions artifacts [confidence low] | CI workflows (zizmor) |
| medium | zizmor/excessive-permissions |
.github/workflows/fw_build_dev.yml:1 | overly broad permissions [confidence medium] | CI workflows (zizmor) |
| medium | zizmor/excessive-permissions |
.github/workflows/fw_build_dev.yml:11 | overly broad permissions [confidence medium] | CI workflows (zizmor) |
| medium | zizmor/artipacked |
.github/workflows/fw_build_dev.yml:14 | credential persistence through GitHub Actions artifacts [confidence low] | CI workflows (zizmor) |
| medium | zizmor/excessive-permissions |
.github/workflows/fw_build_dev.yml:48 | overly broad permissions [confidence medium] | CI workflows (zizmor) |
| medium | zizmor/archived-uses |
.github/workflows/fw_build_dev.yml:58 | action or reusable workflow from archived repository [confidence high] | CI workflows (zizmor) |
| medium | zizmor/excessive-permissions |
.github/workflows/fw_build_main.yml:1 | overly broad permissions [confidence medium] | CI workflows (zizmor) |
| medium | zizmor/excessive-permissions |
.github/workflows/fw_build_main.yml:11 | overly broad permissions [confidence medium] | CI workflows (zizmor) |
| medium | zizmor/artipacked |
.github/workflows/fw_build_main.yml:14 | credential persistence through GitHub Actions artifacts [confidence low] | CI workflows (zizmor) |
| medium | zizmor/excessive-permissions |
.github/workflows/fw_build_main.yml:48 | overly broad permissions [confidence medium] | CI workflows (zizmor) |
| medium | zizmor/archived-uses |
.github/workflows/fw_build_main.yml:60 | action or reusable workflow from archived repository [confidence high] | CI workflows (zizmor) |
| low | zizmor/template-injection |
.github/workflows/deploy_documentation.yml:26 | code injection via template expansion [confidence high] | CI workflows (zizmor) |
| low | gitleaks/generic-api-key |
sdkconfig.unified.old:1377 | Possible generic-api-key secret in history (commit 7302e00470); removed from the current tree but still retrievable | Secrets (gitleaks) |
| low | gitleaks/generic-api-key |
sdkconfig.unified:1415 | Possible generic-api-key secret in history (commit a0f4b271f8); removed from the current tree but still retrievable | Secrets (gitleaks) |
| info | zizmor/superfluous-actions |
.github/workflows/fw_build_dev.yml:68 | action functionality is already included by the runner [confidence high] | CI workflows (zizmor) |
| info | zizmor/superfluous-actions |
.github/workflows/fw_build_main.yml:70 | action functionality is already included by the runner [confidence high] | CI workflows (zizmor) |
Tools and coverage
Every analyzer that ran on this commit. A failed or skipped tool is a coverage gap: its share of the score is left out and the coverage figure drops.
| Analyzer | Pillar | Status | Version | Findings | Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI tool configuration | AI provenance | ok | signatures-v1 | 0 | |
| Explicit AI attribution | AI provenance | ok | signatures-v1 | 0 | |
| Release velocity | AI provenance | ok | prov-4 | 0 | |
| Coding style | AI provenance | ok | — | 0 | |
| Commit velocity | AI provenance | ok | prov-4 | 0 | |
| Findings in AI-written lines | AI provenance | ok | git-blame | 0 | |
| Complexity (lizard) | Code quality | ok | lizard 1.25.1 | 0 | |
| Documentation | Code quality | ok | — | 0 | |
| Duplication (jscpd) | Code quality | ok | repotrust-dup-w6 | 0 | |
| Lint | Code quality | ok | opengrep 1.33.1; rules f1d2b562b414 | 36 | |
| Tests and CI | Code quality | ok | — | 0 | |
| Type safety | Code quality | ok | — | 0 | |
| CI workflows (zizmor) | Security | ok | zizmor 1.32.0 | 35 | |
| Dependencies (osv-scanner) | Security | skipped | — | 0 | |
| Release downloads | Security | ok | — | 0 | |
| Security posture | Security | ok | — | 0 | |
| Package registries | Security | skipped | — | 0 | no registry dependencies declared |
| Static analysis (opengrep) | Security | ok | opengrep 1.33.1; rules f1d2b562b414 | 3 | |
| OpenSSF Scorecard | Security | skipped | — | 0 | no published OpenSSF Scorecard result for this repo |
| Secrets (gitleaks) | Security | ok | gitleaks 8.30.1 | 2 |
Score history
Scores from different scoring versions aren't directly comparable.
| Scored | Commit | Scoring | AI provenance | Quality | Security |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-11-14 | ed602818dc08 | prov-5+qual-2+sec-2 | 0% | 51 | 62 |
| 2026-11-14 | ed602818dc08 | prov-4+qual-2+sec-2 | 0% | 51 | 62 |
Full text report
- Repository: https://github.com/rnd-ash/ultimate-nag52-fw
- Commit:
ed602818dc08ea6db667e70d1f491a091a13befa - Generated: 2026-11-14T14:52:07+00:00
- Scorer 0.1.0, scoring prov-5+qual-2+sec-2, report schema v2
Scores
| Pillar | Score | Signal | Confidence | Coverage |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI provenance (estimated AI-generated share) | 0 | explicit | 95% | 100% |
| Code quality | 51 | weak | 90% | 100% |
| Security | 62 | weak | 85% | 100% |
AI provenance
Explicit AI attribution on 0% of first-party code added; an estimated 0% including velocity signals.
- Explicitly attributed share (lower bound): 0.0%
- Unattributed share in AI-consistent velocity bursts: 14.5%
- Estimated AI-generated share: 0.0%
| AI tool | Attributed commits | Lines added |
|---|---|---|
| Claude Code | 4 | 47 |
- AI tooling configured in repo: generic-agent
Current source lines last changed by AI-attributed commits: 45 of 37,520.
Too few lines in one group to compare finding densities.
- Stylometry index: 0.05 per 1,000 lines (narrated steps 2, placeholders 0, assistant phrasing 0, emoji 0). Reported as a signal, not scored.
| Month | Lines added | Attributed to AI |
|---|---|---|
| 2025-12 | 257 | 0% |
| 2026-01 | 981 | 0% |
| 2026-02 | 1,288 | 0% |
| 2026-03 | 1,152 | 0% |
| 2026-04 | 2,560 | 0% |
| 2026-05 | 662 | 0% |
| 2026-06 | 821 | 0% |
| 2026-07 | 341 | 0% |
| 2026-08 | 731 | 0% |
| 2026-09 | 444 | 11% |
| 2026-10 | 2,041 | 0% |
| 2026-11 | 267 | 0% |
Evidence
- Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (ca36791f1742)
- Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (4e9208cfcd4a)
- Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (9319a83794f9)
- Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (55d4ecca4bb9)
- 12,260 lines of first-party code in ~4.1h (2,974 lines/hour, 2 commit session) (34877d27e0b6)
- 5,569 lines of first-party code in ~3.1h (1,770 lines/hour, 1 commit session) (de37a33c829d)
- AGENTS.md (generic-agent configuration) (AGENTS.md)
- step-by-step narration comment: // Step 1. Aquire ALL Sensors (src/gearbox.)
- step-by-step narration comment: // Now we are FAR too late, so we must increase pressure (src/shifting)
AI provenance describes how code was produced; it is not a quality judgment. Unless attribution is explicit, these are signals consistent with AI generation, not proof. Squash/rebase workflows, imported code, and rewritten history reduce accuracy.
Code quality
Code quality is weak: test-to-source ratio 0.00, no CI test run detected; 26% of function code in complex or long functions; 13% duplicated lines. Weakest area: testing.
| Area | Score |
|---|---|
| Complexity (lizard) | 45 |
| Duplication | 45 |
| Code smells (Opengrep) | 74 |
| Tests and CI | 35 |
| Documentation | 85 |
| Type safety | 40 |
| Process (Scorecard review/maintenance) | n/a |
- Functions: 1,448; mean complexity 3.3, 90th percentile 7; 40 complex and 17 long functions
- Duplicated lines: 13.2% of 28,003 compared
- Tests: 118 test lines for 37,520 source lines (ratio 0.00); CI test commands: none detected; 1% of recent source commits also change tests
- Docs missing or thin: contributing
Most complex functions:
- Gearbox::controller_loop in src/gearbox.cpp: complexity 158, 558 lines
- Gearbox::shift_thread in src/gearbox.cpp: complexity 92, 402 lines
- ShiftingAlgorithm::adaptation_step in src/shifting_algo/s_algo.cpp: complexity 72, 188 lines
- TorqueConverter::process_open_or_slip_state in src/torque_converter.cpp: complexity 59, 148 lines
- Kwp2000_server::process_read_data_local_ident in src/diag/kwp2000.cpp: complexity 48, 162 lines
Security
Security posture is weak: 3 high-severity SAST findings; 19 high-severity workflow issues. Weakest area: posture.
| Area | Score |
|---|---|
| Secrets (gitleaks, tree + history) | 94 |
| Static analysis (Opengrep) | 98 |
| Vulnerable dependencies (OSV) | n/a |
| CI workflows (zizmor) | 1 |
| Posture (policy, updates, signing, lockfiles) | 0 |
| OpenSSF Scorecard | n/a |
- Posture checks passed: lockfiles; missing: security policy, dependency updates, signed commits
Top findings
| Severity | Finding | Location |
|---|---|---|
| high | opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.dangerous-subprocess-use-audit: Detected subprocess function 'check_output' without a static string. If this data can be controlled by a malicious actor, it may be an instance of command injection. Audit the use of this call to ensure it is not controllable by an external resource. You may consider using 'shlex.escape()'. [confidence low] |
patchappinfo.py:125 |
| high | opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.dangerous-subprocess-use-audit: Detected subprocess function 'check_output' without a static string. If this data can be controlled by a malicious actor, it may be an instance of command injection. Audit the use of this call to ensure it is not controllable by an external resource. You may consider using 'shlex.escape()'. [confidence low] |
patchappinfo.py:147 |
| high | opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.dangerous-subprocess-use-audit: Detected subprocess function 'check_output' without a static string. If this data can be controlled by a malicious actor, it may be an instance of command injection. Audit the use of this call to ensure it is not controllable by an external resource. You may consider using 'shlex.escape()'. [confidence low] |
progname.py:71 |
| high | zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] |
.github/workflows/delete-old-dev.yml:14 |
| high | zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] |
.github/workflows/deploy_documentation.yml:14 |
| high | zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] |
.github/workflows/deploy_documentation.yml:28 |
| high | zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] |
.github/workflows/fw_build_dev.yml:14 |
| high | zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] |
.github/workflows/fw_build_dev.yml:18 |
| high | zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] |
.github/workflows/fw_build_dev.yml:25 |
| high | zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] |
.github/workflows/fw_build_dev.yml:30 |
| high | zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] |
.github/workflows/fw_build_dev.yml:39 |
| high | zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] |
.github/workflows/fw_build_dev.yml:53 |
| high | zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] |
.github/workflows/fw_build_dev.yml:58 |
| high | zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] |
.github/workflows/fw_build_dev.yml:68 |
| high | zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] |
.github/workflows/fw_build_main.yml:14 |
| high | zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] |
.github/workflows/fw_build_main.yml:18 |
| high | zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] |
.github/workflows/fw_build_main.yml:25 |
| high | zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] |
.github/workflows/fw_build_main.yml:30 |
| high | zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] |
.github/workflows/fw_build_main.yml:39 |
| high | zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] |
.github/workflows/fw_build_main.yml:53 |
| high | zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] |
.github/workflows/fw_build_main.yml:60 |
| high | zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] |
.github/workflows/fw_build_main.yml:70 |
| medium | zizmor/excessive-permissions: overly broad permissions [confidence medium] |
.github/workflows/delete-old-dev.yml:11 |
| medium | zizmor/artipacked: credential persistence through GitHub Actions artifacts [confidence low] |
.github/workflows/deploy_documentation.yml:14 |
| medium | zizmor/excessive-permissions: overly broad permissions [confidence medium] |
.github/workflows/deploy_documentation.yml:11 |
Static signals only: the scorer never runs the project's code. Secret findings are pattern matches that were not verified, and secret values are never stored.
Repository profile
- Source lines: 37,520; test lines: 118
| Language | Lines |
|---|---|
| C | 18,685 |
| C++ | 17,623 |
| Python | 1,322 |
| Shell | 8 |