Leaderboard github.com

repied/Analyseur-ipd

View repository ↗
JavaScript
★ 0
commit 2f2c0d8ac54c
scored 2026-11-14
scoring prov-5+qual-2+sec-2

unreviewed-ai-risk

AI provenance

98%

explicit

Confidence: 76%
Coverage: 100%

Estimated share of AI-generated code. Explicit attribution is a lower bound.

Code quality

36/100

poor

Confidence: 90%
Coverage: 100%

Complexity, duplication, lint density, tests, CI, docs and review process.

Security

51/100

weak

Confidence: 85%
Coverage: 100%

Secrets, static analysis, vulnerable dependencies, CI and supply-chain posture.

Dispute or request a re-score Full report JSON

AI provenance

98% explicit

Explicit AI attribution on 98% of first-party code added; an estimated 98% including velocity signals.

How the score is built

Explicitly attributed share98%
Unattributed share in AI-pace bursts0%
Estimated AI-generated share98%
AI tool configuration files0
Work sessions at AI pace1
Releases at AI pacenot measured
Coding-style index (1.0+ means possible)0.50

Attributed AI tools

Tool	Commits	Lines added	First seen	Last seen
GitHub Copilot coding agent	12	13,050	2026-03-09	2026-03-12
Jules	2	0	2026-03-08	2026-03-08

Lines added per month all AI-attributed share

2026-0313,298 · 98% AI

Findings in AI-attributed lines vs the rest

From git blame: 12,706 lines trace to AI-attributed commits, 226 to others. Too few lines in one group for a fair comparison. Reported, not scored.

Findings per 1,000 lines	AI-attributed	Other	Ratio
Code quality	0.87	0.00	—
Security	1.42	0.00	—

Evidence by analyzer

Explicit AI attributionok16 items

attributed_commit_share: 58.3%
attributed_commits: 14
attributed_loc: 13,050
attributed_loc_share: 98.1%
commits: 24
effective_loc: 13,298
tools_detected: 2

AI tool configurationok

artifacts: 0
tools_configured: 0
workflow_agents: 0

Commit velocityok1 item

11,329 lines of first-party code in ~5.1h (2,243 lines/hour, 5 commit session)

excluded_import_loc: 0
flagged_loc: 11,329
flagged_loc_share: 85.2%
flagged_units: 1
max_loc_per_hour: 2,243.24
measured_loc: 13,298
median_loc_per_hour: 137.69
pr_timed_units: 0
pre_ai_era_burst_loc: 0
pre_ai_era_bursts: 0
pre_ai_era_measured_loc: 0
work_units: 6

Release velocityskipped

Coding styleok1 item

step-by-step narration comment: // Finally, search either indexOf (if dir is true) or lastIndexOf

count:assistant_voice: 0
count:emoji_in_code: 11
count:narrated_steps: 1
count:placeholder: 0
files:assistant_voice: 0
files:emoji_in_code: 1
files:narrated_steps: 1
files:placeholder: 0
index: 0.50
lines_scanned: 12,932
per_kloc:assistant_voice: 0
per_kloc:emoji_in_code: 0.85
per_kloc:narrated_steps: 0.08
per_kloc:placeholder: 0

Findings in AI-written linesok

ai_lines: 12,706
blame_failures: 0
files_blamed: 7
other_lines: 226
quality:ai_findings: 11
quality:ai_per_kloc: 0.87
quality:other_findings: 0
quality:other_per_kloc: 0
security:ai_findings: 18
security:ai_per_kloc: 1.42
security:other_findings: 0
security:other_per_kloc: 0

Code quality

36 poor

Code quality is poor: test-to-source ratio 0.01, no CI test run detected; 82% of function code in complex or long functions; 12% duplicated lines. Weakest area: complexity.

How the score is built

Complexity9
Duplication49
Lint and smells90
Tests and CI25
Documentation20
Type safety40
Review processnot measured

Evidence by analyzer

Complexity (lizard)ok10 items

complex_functions: 18
function_nloc: 11,792
functions: 233
long_functions: 3
many_param_functions: 0
mean_ccn: 4.99
p90_ccn: 11
risky_nloc_share: 81.8%

Duplication (jscpd)ok5 items

compared_lines: 10,747
duplicated_lines: 1,276
duplicated_share: 11.9%
files: 7

Lintok

category:best-practice: 1
category:correctness: 10
findings: 11
scanned_lines: 12,932
weighted_findings: 5.75

Tests and CIok

check:ci_present: no
check:ci_runs_lint: no
check:ci_runs_tests: no
check:has_tests: yes
check:test_ratio: no
check:tests_cochange: no
ci_files: 0
cochange_commits: 16
cochange_share: 12.5%
source_lines: 12,932
test_lines: 109
test_ratio: 0.01

Documentationok1 item

README.md README.md

check:changelog: no
check:contributing: no
check:license: no
check:readme: no
readme_lines: 3

Type safetyok

check:low_escape_density: yes
check:strict_config: no
escapes: 0
escapes_per_kloc: 0

Security

51 weak

Security posture is weak: 1 possible secret(s) in the tree, 0 only in history; 46 known vulnerabilities in 10 dependencies; 10 high-severity SAST findings. Weakest area: posture.

How the score is built

Secrets66
Static analysis (SAST)78
Vulnerable dependencies30
CI workflowsnot measured
Security posture0
OpenSSF Scorecardnot measured

Evidence by analyzer

OpenSSF Scorecardskipped

no published OpenSSF Scorecard result for this repo

Package registriesok

checked: 10
declared: 10
lookup_errors: 0
missing: 0
recent: 0

Secrets (gitleaks)ok

secrets_current: 1
secrets_history: 0
secrets_low_confidence: 0
secrets_nonprod: 0

Static analysis (opengrep)ok

findings: 17
findings_high: 10
findings_low: 0
findings_medium: 7
parse_errors: 0
scanned_lines: 12,932
weighted_findings: 9.25

Dependencies (osv-scanner)ok

penalty: 72
vulnerabilities: 46
vulnerable_packages: 10
vulns_critical: 1
vulns_high: 15
vulns_low: 5
vulns_medium: 25
vulns_unknown: 0

CI workflows (zizmor)skipped

Security postureok

check:dependency_updates: no
check:lockfiles: yes
check:security_policy: no
check:signed_commits: no
signed_commit_share: 25.0%
unpinned_manifests: 0

Release downloadsok

binary_assets: 0
signals: 0
suspicious: 0

Findings

1 critical26 high36 medium12 low

Severity	Rule	Location	Message	Tool
critical	`osv/GHSA-xv26-6w52-cph6`	package-lock.json	[email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-xv26-6w52-cph6	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
high	`osv/GHSA-2m5v-pch6-74hx`	package-lock.json	[email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-2m5v-pch6-74hx	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
high	`osv/GHSA-4cwx-7wf7-3272`	package-lock.json	[email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-4cwx-7wf7-3272	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
high	`osv/GHSA-4w7w-5xrc-9h26`	package-lock.json	[email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-4w7w-5xrc-9h26	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
high	`osv/GHSA-68fv-2mgg-jv7q`	package-lock.json	[email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-68fv-2mgg-jv7q	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
high	`osv/GHSA-c2c7-rcm5-vvqj`	package-lock.json	[email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-c2c7-rcm5-vvqj	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
high	`osv/GHSA-f269-vfmq-vjvj`	package-lock.json	[email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-f269-vfmq-vjvj	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
high	`osv/GHSA-grv7-fg5c-xmjg`	package-lock.json	[email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-grv7-fg5c-xmjg	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
high	`osv/GHSA-qr28-fpjm-wq7f`	package-lock.json	[email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-qr28-fpjm-wq7f	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
high	`osv/GHSA-qrxm-fqhp-jwvm`	package-lock.json	[email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-qrxm-fqhp-jwvm	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
high	`osv/GHSA-rfgv-xxqx-mfg5`	package-lock.json	[email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-rfgv-xxqx-mfg5	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
high	`osv/GHSA-v9p9-hfj2-hcw8`	package-lock.json	[email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-v9p9-hfj2-hcw8	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
high	`osv/GHSA-vrm6-8vpv-qv8q`	package-lock.json	[email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-vrm6-8vpv-qv8q	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
high	`osv/GHSA-vxpw-j846-p89q`	package-lock.json	[email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-vxpw-j846-p89q	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
high	`osv/GHSA-w5hq-g745-h8pq`	package-lock.json	[email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-w5hq-g745-h8pq	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
high	`osv/GHSA-xjj6-f33q-929c`	package-lock.json	[email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-xjj6-f33q-929c	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
high	`opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-document-method`	src/js/app.js:387	User controlled data in methods like `innerHTML`, `outerHTML` or `document.write` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low]	Static analysis (opengrep)
high	`opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-innerhtml`	src/js/app.js:387	User controlled data in a `document.getElementById('statMaxDepth').innerHTML` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low]	Static analysis (opengrep)
high	`opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-document-method`	src/js/app.js:388	User controlled data in methods like `innerHTML`, `outerHTML` or `document.write` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low]	Static analysis (opengrep)
high	`opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-innerhtml`	src/js/app.js:388	User controlled data in a `document.getElementById('statDuration').innerHTML` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low]	Static analysis (opengrep)
high	`opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-document-method`	src/js/app.js:447	User controlled data in methods like `innerHTML`, `outerHTML` or `document.write` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low]	Static analysis (opengrep)
high	`opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-innerhtml`	src/js/app.js:447	User controlled data in a `card.innerHTML` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low]	Static analysis (opengrep)
high	`gitleaks/gcp-api-key`	src/js/app.js:580	Possible gcp-api-key secret in the current tree	Secrets (gitleaks)
high	`opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-document-method`	src/js/app.js:640	User controlled data in methods like `innerHTML`, `outerHTML` or `document.write` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low]	Static analysis (opengrep)
high	`opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-innerhtml`	src/js/app.js:640	User controlled data in a `resultDiv.innerHTML` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low]	Static analysis (opengrep)
high	`opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-document-method`	src/js/app.js:645	User controlled data in methods like `innerHTML`, `outerHTML` or `document.write` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low]	Static analysis (opengrep)
high	`opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-innerhtml`	src/js/app.js:645	User controlled data in a `resultDiv.innerHTML` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low]	Static analysis (opengrep)
medium	`opengrep/javascript.lang.best-practice.javascript-alert`	src/js/app.js:583	found alert() call; should this be in production code?	Lint
medium	`opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.no-stringify-keys`	src/js/app.js:634	JSON stringify does not produce a stable key ordering, and should not be relied on for producing object keys. Consider using json-stable-stringify instead.	Lint
medium	`opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.no-stringify-keys`	src/js/app.js:634	JSON stringify does not produce a stable key ordering, and should not be relied on for producing object keys. Consider using json-stable-stringify instead.	Lint
medium	`opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.no-stringify-keys`	src/js/app.js:639	JSON stringify does not produce a stable key ordering, and should not be relied on for producing object keys. Consider using json-stable-stringify instead.	Lint
medium	`osv/GHSA-2jfj-6hjv-fm6j`	package-lock.json	[email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-2jfj-6hjv-fm6j	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
medium	`osv/GHSA-2mjp-6q6p-2qxm`	package-lock.json	[email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-2mjp-6q6p-2qxm	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
medium	`osv/GHSA-3v7f-55p6-f55p`	package-lock.json	[email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-3v7f-55p6-f55p	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
medium	`osv/GHSA-3xpg-4rpp-hhhm`	package-lock.json	[email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-3xpg-4rpp-hhhm	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
medium	`osv/GHSA-4992-7rv2-5pvq`	package-lock.json	[email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-4992-7rv2-5pvq	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
medium	`osv/GHSA-4qv8-2p9j-2685`	package-lock.json	[email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-4qv8-2p9j-2685	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
medium	`osv/GHSA-4vj7-5mj6-jm8m`	package-lock.json	[email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-4vj7-5mj6-jm8m	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
medium	`osv/GHSA-55wc-3pg8-jfw6`	package-lock.json	[email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-55wc-3pg8-jfw6	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
medium	`osv/GHSA-8xcm-r25x-g524`	package-lock.json	[email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-8xcm-r25x-g524	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
medium	`osv/GHSA-952p-6rrq-rcjv`	package-lock.json	[email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-952p-6rrq-rcjv	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
medium	`osv/GHSA-9f6g-j8ch-79g4`	package-lock.json	[email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-9f6g-j8ch-79g4	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
medium	`osv/GHSA-9fm3-97px-rjf6`	package-lock.json	[email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-9fm3-97px-rjf6	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
medium	`osv/GHSA-f72v-6w45-q472`	package-lock.json	[email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-f72v-6w45-q472	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
medium	`osv/GHSA-gcqx-w48m-w2h4`	package-lock.json	[email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-gcqx-w48m-w2h4	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
medium	`osv/GHSA-jr45-8vmc-qm54`	package-lock.json	[email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-jr45-8vmc-qm54	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
medium	`osv/GHSA-jxfw-x594-9x9m`	package-lock.json	[email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-jxfw-x594-9x9m	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
medium	`osv/GHSA-m8rv-5g2x-5cg5`	package-lock.json	[email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-m8rv-5g2x-5cg5	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
medium	`osv/GHSA-mp7j-qc5w-4988`	package-lock.json	[email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-mp7j-qc5w-4988	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
medium	`osv/GHSA-p88m-4jfj-68fv`	package-lock.json	[email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-p88m-4jfj-68fv	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
medium	`osv/GHSA-phc3-fgpg-7m6h`	package-lock.json	[email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-phc3-fgpg-7m6h	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
medium	`osv/GHSA-pmjh-fq2x-6v4x`	package-lock.json	[email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-pmjh-fq2x-6v4x	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
medium	`osv/GHSA-pr7r-676h-xcf6`	package-lock.json	[email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-pr7r-676h-xcf6	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
medium	`osv/GHSA-rx4f-c7p8-82vq`	package-lock.json	[email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-rx4f-c7p8-82vq	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
medium	`osv/GHSA-v3r7-h72x-cjcm`	package-lock.json	[email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-v3r7-h72x-cjcm	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
medium	`osv/GHSA-vcc3-ghjq-m6fr`	package-lock.json	[email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-vcc3-ghjq-m6fr	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
medium	`opengrep/javascript.lang.security.html-in-template-string`	src/js/app.js:387	This template literal looks like HTML and has interpolated variables. These variables are not HTML-encoded by default. If the variables contain HTML tags, these may be interpreted by the browser, resulting in cross-site scripting (XSS)....	Static analysis (opengrep)
medium	`opengrep/javascript.lang.security.html-in-template-string`	src/js/app.js:388	This template literal looks like HTML and has interpolated variables. These variables are not HTML-encoded by default. If the variables contain HTML tags, these may be interpreted by the browser, resulting in cross-site scripting (XSS)....	Static analysis (opengrep)
medium	`opengrep/javascript.lang.security.html-in-template-string`	src/js/app.js:444	This template literal looks like HTML and has interpolated variables. These variables are not HTML-encoded by default. If the variables contain HTML tags, these may be interpreted by the browser, resulting in cross-site scripting (XSS)....	Static analysis (opengrep)
medium	`opengrep/javascript.lang.security.html-in-template-string`	src/js/app.js:447	This template literal looks like HTML and has interpolated variables. These variables are not HTML-encoded by default. If the variables contain HTML tags, these may be interpreted by the browser, resulting in cross-site scripting (XSS)....	Static analysis (opengrep)
medium	`opengrep/javascript.lang.security.html-in-template-string`	src/js/app.js:645	This template literal looks like HTML and has interpolated variables. These variables are not HTML-encoded by default. If the variables contain HTML tags, these may be interpreted by the browser, resulting in cross-site scripting (XSS)....	Static analysis (opengrep)
medium	`opengrep/javascript.lang.security.html-in-template-string`	src/js/app.js:673	This template literal looks like HTML and has interpolated variables. These variables are not HTML-encoded by default. If the variables contain HTML tags, these may be interpreted by the browser, resulting in cross-site scripting (XSS)....	Static analysis (opengrep)
medium	`opengrep/javascript.lang.security.html-in-template-string`	src/js/app.js:684	This template literal looks like HTML and has interpolated variables. These variables are not HTML-encoded by default. If the variables contain HTML tags, these may be interpreted by the browser, resulting in cross-site scripting (XSS)....	Static analysis (opengrep)
low	`opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.missing-template-string-indicator`	implement_shearwater.js:3	This looks like a JavaScript template string. Are you missing a '$' in front of '{...}'?	Lint
low	`opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.missing-template-string-indicator`	implement_shearwater.js:3	This looks like a JavaScript template string. Are you missing a '$' in front of '{...}'?	Lint
low	`opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.missing-template-string-indicator`	patch_garmin.js:10	This looks like a JavaScript template string. Are you missing a '$' in front of '{...}'?	Lint
low	`opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.missing-template-string-indicator`	patch_garmin.js:10	This looks like a JavaScript template string. Are you missing a '$' in front of '{...}'?	Lint
low	`opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.useless-assignment`	src/js/fit-parser.bundle.js:52	`arr[L++]` is assigned twice; the first assignment is useless	Lint
low	`opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.useless-assignment`	src/js/fit-parser.bundle.js:53	`arr[L++]` is assigned twice; the first assignment is useless	Lint
low	`opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.useless-assignment`	src/js/fit-parser.bundle.js:62	`arr[L++]` is assigned twice; the first assignment is useless	Lint
low	`osv/GHSA-2gqq-gqf2-x968`	package-lock.json	[email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-2gqq-gqf2-x968	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
low	`osv/GHSA-35p6-xmwp-9g52`	package-lock.json	[email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-35p6-xmwp-9g52	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
low	`osv/GHSA-8436-99hf-9mmv`	package-lock.json	[email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-8436-99hf-9mmv	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
low	`osv/GHSA-g8m3-5g58-fq7m`	package-lock.json	[email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-g8m3-5g58-fq7m	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
low	`osv/GHSA-r53p-7pc4-xj5r`	package-lock.json	[email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-r53p-7pc4-xj5r	Dependencies (osv-scanner)

Tools and coverage

Every analyzer that ran on this commit. A failed or skipped tool is a coverage gap: its share of the score is left out and the coverage figure drops.

Analyzer	Pillar	Status	Version	Findings	Note
AI tool configuration	AI provenance	ok	`signatures-v1`	0
Explicit AI attribution	AI provenance	ok	`signatures-v1`	0
Release velocity	AI provenance	skipped	`—`	0
Coding style	AI provenance	ok	`—`	0
Commit velocity	AI provenance	ok	`prov-4`	0
Findings in AI-written lines	AI provenance	ok	`git-blame`	0
Complexity (lizard)	Code quality	ok	`lizard 1.25.1`	0
Documentation	Code quality	ok	`—`	0
Duplication (jscpd)	Code quality	ok	`repotrust-dup-w6`	0
Lint	Code quality	ok	`opengrep 1.33.1; rules f1d2b562b414`	11
Tests and CI	Code quality	ok	`—`	0
Type safety	Code quality	ok	`—`	0
CI workflows (zizmor)	Security	skipped	`—`	0
Dependencies (osv-scanner)	Security	ok	`osv-scanner version: 2.7.1`	46
Release downloads	Security	ok	`—`	0
Security posture	Security	ok	`—`	0
Package registries	Security	ok	`—`	0
Static analysis (opengrep)	Security	ok	`opengrep 1.33.1; rules f1d2b562b414`	17
OpenSSF Scorecard	Security	skipped	`—`	0	no published OpenSSF Scorecard result for this repo
Secrets (gitleaks)	Security	ok	`gitleaks 8.30.1`	1

Score history

Scores from different scoring versions aren't directly comparable.

Scored	Commit	Scoring	AI provenance	Quality	Security
2026-11-14	`2f2c0d8ac54c`	`prov-5+qual-2+sec-2`	98%	36	51
2026-11-14	`2f2c0d8ac54c`	`prov-4+qual-2+sec-2`	98%	36	51

Embed a badge

Maintainers can show these in a README. Badges update when the repository is re-scored.

[![RepoTrust ai](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/badge/github.com/repied/Analyseur-ipd/ai.svg)](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/r/github.com/repied/Analyseur-ipd/)

[![RepoTrust quality](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/badge/github.com/repied/Analyseur-ipd/quality.svg)](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/r/github.com/repied/Analyseur-ipd/)

[![RepoTrust security](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/badge/github.com/repied/Analyseur-ipd/security.svg)](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/r/github.com/repied/Analyseur-ipd/)

Full text report

Repository: https://github.com/repied/Analyseur-ipd
Commit: 2f2c0d8ac54ce4ac1c1aee533c3734fdbdaf95b4
Generated: 2026-11-14T14:52:07+00:00
Scorer 0.1.0, scoring prov-5+qual-2+sec-2, report schema v2

Scores

Unreviewed AI code risk: a large share of this code is explicitly AI-attributed, and its tests or review process are weak while quality or security scores are low.

Pillar	Score	Signal	Confidence	Coverage
AI provenance (estimated AI-generated share)	98	explicit	76%	100%
Code quality	36	poor	90%	100%
Security	51	weak	85%	100%

AI provenance

Explicit AI attribution on 98% of first-party code added; an estimated 98% including velocity signals.

Explicitly attributed share (lower bound): 98.1%
Unattributed share in AI-consistent velocity bursts: 0.0%
Estimated AI-generated share: 98.1%

AI tool	Attributed commits	Lines added
GitHub Copilot coding agent	12	13,050
Jules	2	0

Current source lines last changed by AI-attributed commits: 12,706 of 12,932.

Too few lines in one group to compare finding densities.

Stylometry index: 0.50 per 1,000 lines (narrated steps 1, placeholders 0, assistant phrasing 0, emoji 11). Reported as a signal, not scored.

Month	Lines added	Attributed to AI
2026-03	13,298	98%

Evidence

GitHub Copilot coding agent: trailer 'Co-authored-by: Copilot' (2f2c0d8ac54c)
GitHub Copilot coding agent: trailer 'Co-authored-by: Copilot' (3678e8582eb8)
GitHub Copilot coding agent: trailer 'Co-authored-by: Copilot' (84c3821ecb9f)
GitHub Copilot coding agent: trailer 'Co-authored-by: Copilot' (24ef7185112b)
GitHub Copilot coding agent: trailer 'Co-authored-by: Copilot' (6b37ac67d5ba)
GitHub Copilot coding agent: trailer 'Co-authored-by: Copilot' (4496dadd4e9b)
GitHub Copilot coding agent: trailer 'Co-authored-by: Copilot' (b5a0deecc3a9)
GitHub Copilot coding agent: trailer 'Co-authored-by: Copilot' (171299c70517)
GitHub Copilot coding agent: trailer 'Co-authored-by: Copilot' (9af5594e5d99)
GitHub Copilot coding agent: trailer 'Co-authored-by: Copilot' (d07ed228a466)
GitHub Copilot coding agent: trailer 'Co-authored-by: Copilot' (e65fabdda02b)
GitHub Copilot coding agent: trailer 'Co-authored-by: Copilot' (c902f8447fdb)
Jules: author google-labs-jules[bot] (fb33b9d9e74d)
Jules: author google-labs-jules[bot] (aed6c331a8ce)
11,329 lines of first-party code in ~5.1h (2,243 lines/hour, 5 commit session) (b5a0deecc3a9)

AI provenance describes how code was produced; it is not a quality judgment. Unless attribution is explicit, these are signals consistent with AI generation, not proof. Squash/rebase workflows, imported code, and rewritten history reduce accuracy.

Code quality

Code quality is poor: test-to-source ratio 0.01, no CI test run detected; 82% of function code in complex or long functions; 12% duplicated lines. Weakest area: complexity.

Area	Score
Complexity (lizard)	9
Duplication	49
Code smells (Opengrep)	90
Tests and CI	25
Documentation	20
Type safety	40
Process (Scorecard review/maintenance)	n/a

Functions: 233; mean complexity 5.0, 90th percentile 11; 18 complex and 3 long functions
Duplicated lines: 11.9% of 10,747 compared
Tests: 109 test lines for 12,932 source lines (ratio 0.01); CI test commands: none detected; 12% of recent source commits also change tests
Docs missing or thin: readme, license, contributing, changelog

Most complex functions:

Security

Security posture is weak: 1 possible secret(s) in the tree, 0 only in history; 46 known vulnerabilities in 10 dependencies; 10 high-severity SAST findings. Weakest area: posture.

Area	Score
Secrets (gitleaks, tree + history)	66
Static analysis (Opengrep)	78
Vulnerable dependencies (OSV)	30
CI workflows (zizmor)	n/a
Posture (policy, updates, signing, lockfiles)	0
OpenSSF Scorecard	n/a

Known vulnerabilities: 46 in 10 packages (critical 1, high 15, medium 25, low 5)
Posture checks passed: lockfiles; missing: security policy, dependency updates, signed commits

Top findings

Severity	Finding	Location
critical	`osv/GHSA-xv26-6w52-cph6`: [email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-xv26-6w52-cph6	package-lock.json
high	`gitleaks/gcp-api-key`: Possible gcp-api-key secret in the current tree	src/js/app.js:580
high	`opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-document-method`: User controlled data in methods like `innerHTML`, `outerHTML` or `document.write` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low]	src/js/app.js:387
high	`opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-innerhtml`: User controlled data in a `document.getElementById('statMaxDepth').innerHTML` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low]	src/js/app.js:387
high	`opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-document-method`: User controlled data in methods like `innerHTML`, `outerHTML` or `document.write` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low]	src/js/app.js:388
high	`opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-innerhtml`: User controlled data in a `document.getElementById('statDuration').innerHTML` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low]	src/js/app.js:388
high	`opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-document-method`: User controlled data in methods like `innerHTML`, `outerHTML` or `document.write` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low]	src/js/app.js:447
high	`opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-innerhtml`: User controlled data in a `card.innerHTML` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low]	src/js/app.js:447
high	`opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-document-method`: User controlled data in methods like `innerHTML`, `outerHTML` or `document.write` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low]	src/js/app.js:640
high	`opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-innerhtml`: User controlled data in a `resultDiv.innerHTML` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low]	src/js/app.js:640
high	`opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-document-method`: User controlled data in methods like `innerHTML`, `outerHTML` or `document.write` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low]	src/js/app.js:645
high	`opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-innerhtml`: User controlled data in a `resultDiv.innerHTML` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low]	src/js/app.js:645
high	`osv/GHSA-grv7-fg5c-xmjg`: [email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-grv7-fg5c-xmjg	package-lock.json
high	`osv/GHSA-qr28-fpjm-wq7f`: [email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-qr28-fpjm-wq7f	package-lock.json
high	`osv/GHSA-c2c7-rcm5-vvqj`: [email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-c2c7-rcm5-vvqj	package-lock.json
high	`osv/GHSA-68fv-2mgg-jv7q`: [email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-68fv-2mgg-jv7q	package-lock.json
high	`osv/GHSA-2m5v-pch6-74hx`: [email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-2m5v-pch6-74hx	package-lock.json
high	`osv/GHSA-4cwx-7wf7-3272`: [email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-4cwx-7wf7-3272	package-lock.json
high	`osv/GHSA-4w7w-5xrc-9h26`: [email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-4w7w-5xrc-9h26	package-lock.json
high	`osv/GHSA-f269-vfmq-vjvj`: [email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-f269-vfmq-vjvj	package-lock.json
high	`osv/GHSA-qrxm-fqhp-jwvm`: [email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-qrxm-fqhp-jwvm	package-lock.json
high	`osv/GHSA-rfgv-xxqx-mfg5`: [email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-rfgv-xxqx-mfg5	package-lock.json
high	`osv/GHSA-v9p9-hfj2-hcw8`: [email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-v9p9-hfj2-hcw8	package-lock.json
high	`osv/GHSA-vrm6-8vpv-qv8q`: [email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-vrm6-8vpv-qv8q	package-lock.json
high	`osv/GHSA-vxpw-j846-p89q`: [email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-vxpw-j846-p89q	package-lock.json

Static signals only: the scorer never runs the project's code. Secret findings are pattern matches that were not verified, and secret values are never stored.

Repository profile

Source lines: 12,932; test lines: 109

Language	Lines
JavaScript	13,002
TypeScript	25
Shell	14