Leaderboard github.com
rellek550/Pistol-CLI
Windows dev toolkit for project runtimes, diagnostics, ports, code mapping, and repair.
AI provenance
0%
possible
- Confidence
- 47%
- Coverage
- 100%
Estimated share of AI-generated code. Explicit attribution is a lower bound.
Code quality
47/100
poor
- Confidence
- 90%
- Coverage
- 100%
Complexity, duplication, lint density, tests, CI, docs and review process.
Security
60/100
weak
- Confidence
- 85%
- Coverage
- 100%
Secrets, static analysis, vulnerable dependencies, CI and supply-chain posture.
AI provenance
0% possible
Weak signals consistent with AI-assisted development.
How the score is built
- Explicitly attributed share0%
- Unattributed share in AI-pace bursts62%
- Estimated AI-generated share0%
- AI tool configuration files0
- Work sessions at AI pace1
- Releases at AI pacenot measured
- Coding-style index (1.0+ means possible)0.00
Lines added per month all AI-attributed share
- 2026-1012,209 · 0% AI
Evidence by analyzer
Explicit AI attributionok
- attributed_commit_share
- 0.0%
- attributed_commits
- 0
- attributed_loc
- 0
- attributed_loc_share
- 0.0%
- commits
- 26
- effective_loc
- 12,209
- tools_detected
- 0
AI tool configurationok
- artifacts
- 0
- tools_configured
- 0
- workflow_agents
- 0
Commit velocityok1 item
- excluded_import_loc
- 3,836
- flagged_loc
- 7,512
- flagged_loc_share
- 89.7%
- flagged_units
- 1
- max_loc_per_hour
- 1,878
- measured_loc
- 8,373
- median_loc_per_hour
- 1,043.01
- pr_timed_units
- 0
- pre_ai_era_burst_loc
- 0
- pre_ai_era_bursts
- 0
- pre_ai_era_measured_loc
- 0
- work_units
- 2
Release velocityskipped
Coding styleok
- count:assistant_voice
- 0
- count:emoji_in_code
- 0
- count:narrated_steps
- 0
- count:placeholder
- 0
- files:assistant_voice
- 0
- files:emoji_in_code
- 0
- files:narrated_steps
- 0
- files:placeholder
- 0
- index
- 0
- lines_scanned
- 9,239
- per_kloc:assistant_voice
- 0
- per_kloc:emoji_in_code
- 0
- per_kloc:narrated_steps
- 0
- per_kloc:placeholder
- 0
Code quality
47 poor
Code quality is poor: test-to-source ratio 0.28, no CI test run detected; 42% of function code in complex or long functions; 2% duplicated lines. Weakest area: lint.
How the score is built
- Complexity28
- Duplication90
- Lint and smells25
- Tests and CI44
- Documentation65
- Type safety40
- Review processnot measured
Evidence by analyzer
Complexity (lizard)ok10 items
- dispatch in pistol/cli.py: complexity 166, 886 lines
- run in pistol/doctor.py: complexity 64, 101 lines
- handler_for.forward in pistol/lecap_proxy.py: complexity 43, 64 lines
- access in pistol/access_commands.py: complexity 40, 68 lines
- run in pistol/shrimp.py: complexity 30, 54 lines
- detect in pistol/utils/project.py: complexity 30, 42 lines
- execute in pistol/wsl/bootstrap.py: complexity 30, 85 lines
- render in pistol/shrimp.py: complexity 28, 29 lines
- run in pistol/lecap_worker.py: complexity 27, 71 lines
- api in pistol/wsl/server.py: complexity 27, 73 lines
- complex_functions
- 30
- function_nloc
- 6,002
- functions
- 398
- long_functions
- 3
- many_param_functions
- 0
- mean_ccn
- 5.84
- p90_ccn
- 13
- risky_nloc_share
- 42.2%
Duplication (jscpd)ok4 items
- 6+ duplicated lines: install.ps1:8 and install.ps1:724
- 6+ duplicated lines: pistol/cli.py:1305 and pistol/cli.py:1346
- 6+ duplicated lines: pistol/config.py:71 and pistol/lecap_runtime.py:36
- 6+ duplicated lines: pistol/explorer.py:56 and pistol/explorer.py:79
- compared_lines
- 6,729
- duplicated_lines
- 118
- duplicated_share
- 1.8%
- files
- 51
Lintok
- category:best-practice
- 20
- category:maintainability
- 4
- findings
- 24
- scanned_lines
- 8,240
- weighted_findings
- 46
Tests and CIok
- check:ci_present
- no
- check:ci_runs_lint
- no
- check:ci_runs_tests
- no
- check:has_tests
- yes
- check:test_ratio
- no
- check:tests_cochange
- yes
- ci_files
- 0
- cochange_commits
- 4
- cochange_share
- 50.0%
- source_lines
- 9,239
- test_lines
- 2,584
- test_ratio
- 0.28
Documentationok2 items
- README.md
README.md - LICENSE
LICENSE
- check:changelog
- no
- check:contributing
- no
- check:license
- yes
- check:readme
- yes
- readme_lines
- 196
Type safetyok
- check:low_escape_density
- yes
- check:strict_config
- no
- escapes
- 4
- escapes_per_kloc
- 0.50
Security
60 weak
Security posture is weak: 24 high-severity SAST findings. Weakest area: posture.
How the score is built
- Secrets94
- Static analysis (SAST)38
- Vulnerable dependenciesnot measured
- CI workflowsnot measured
- Security posture20
- OpenSSF Scorecardnot measured
Evidence by analyzer
OpenSSF Scorecardskipped
no published OpenSSF Scorecard result for this repo
Package registriesok
- checked
- 4
- declared
- 4
- lookup_errors
- 0
- missing
- 0
- recent
- 0
Secrets (gitleaks)ok
- secrets_current
- 0
- secrets_history
- 0
- secrets_low_confidence
- 2
- secrets_nonprod
- 0
Static analysis (opengrep)ok
- findings
- 34
- findings_high
- 24
- findings_low
- 0
- findings_medium
- 10
- parse_errors
- 0
- scanned_lines
- 8,240
- weighted_findings
- 22.95
Dependencies (osv-scanner)skipped
CI workflows (zizmor)skipped
Security postureok
- check:dependency_updates
- no
- check:lockfiles
- yes
- check:security_policy
- no
- check:signed_commits
- yes
- signed_commit_share
- 88.5%
- unpinned_manifests
- 0
Release downloadsok
- binary_assets
- 0
- signals
- 0
- suspicious
- 0
Findings
35 high23 medium2 low
60 findings
| Severity | Rule | Location | Message | Tool |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| high | opengrep/python.lang.best-practice.arbitrary-sleep |
pistol/config.py:89 | time.sleep() call; did you mean to leave this in? | Lint |
| high | opengrep/python.lang.best-practice.arbitrary-sleep |
pistol/fire.py:280 | time.sleep() call; did you mean to leave this in? | Lint |
| high | opengrep/python.lang.best-practice.arbitrary-sleep |
pistol/lecap_runtime.py:238 | time.sleep() call; did you mean to leave this in? | Lint |
| high | opengrep/python.lang.best-practice.arbitrary-sleep |
pistol/lecap_runtime.py:286 | time.sleep() call; did you mean to leave this in? | Lint |
| high | opengrep/python.lang.best-practice.arbitrary-sleep |
pistol/lecap_runtime.py:54 | time.sleep() call; did you mean to leave this in? | Lint |
| high | opengrep/python.lang.best-practice.arbitrary-sleep |
pistol/lecap_worker.py:81 | time.sleep() call; did you mean to leave this in? | Lint |
| high | opengrep/python.lang.best-practice.arbitrary-sleep |
pistol/watch.py:41 | time.sleep() call; did you mean to leave this in? | Lint |
| high | opengrep/python.lang.best-practice.arbitrary-sleep |
pistol/wsl/bootstrap.py:145 | time.sleep() call; did you mean to leave this in? | Lint |
| high | opengrep/python.lang.best-practice.arbitrary-sleep |
pistol/wsl/bootstrap.py:57 | time.sleep() call; did you mean to leave this in? | Lint |
| high | opengrep/python.lang.best-practice.arbitrary-sleep |
pistol/wsl/manager.py:203 | time.sleep() call; did you mean to leave this in? | Lint |
| high | opengrep/python.lang.best-practice.arbitrary-sleep |
pistol/wsl/manager.py:239 | time.sleep() call; did you mean to leave this in? | Lint |
| high | opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.dangerous-subprocess-use-audit |
pistol/doctor.py:121 | Detected subprocess function 'run' without a static string. If this data can be controlled by a malicious actor, it may be an instance of command injection. Audit the use of this call to ensure it is not controllable by an external... | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| high | opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.dangerous-subprocess-use-audit |
pistol/doctor.py:136 | Detected subprocess function 'run' without a static string. If this data can be controlled by a malicious actor, it may be an instance of command injection. Audit the use of this call to ensure it is not controllable by an external... | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| high | opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.dangerous-subprocess-use-audit |
pistol/explorer.py:66 | Detected subprocess function 'list2cmdline' without a static string. If this data can be controlled by a malicious actor, it may be an instance of command injection. Audit the use of this call to ensure it is not controllable by an... | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| high | opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.dangerous-subprocess-use-audit |
pistol/fire.py:125 | Detected subprocess function 'run' without a static string. If this data can be controlled by a malicious actor, it may be an instance of command injection. Audit the use of this call to ensure it is not controllable by an external... | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| high | opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.dangerous-subprocess-use-audit |
pistol/fire.py:178 | Detected subprocess function 'Popen' without a static string. If this data can be controlled by a malicious actor, it may be an instance of command injection. Audit the use of this call to ensure it is not controllable by an external... | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| high | opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.dangerous-subprocess-use-audit |
pistol/lecap_runtime.py:219 | Detected subprocess function 'Popen' without a static string. If this data can be controlled by a malicious actor, it may be an instance of command injection. Audit the use of this call to ensure it is not controllable by an external... | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| high | opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.dangerous-subprocess-use-audit |
pistol/medic.py:103 | Detected subprocess function 'run' without a static string. If this data can be controlled by a malicious actor, it may be an instance of command injection. Audit the use of this call to ensure it is not controllable by an external... | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| high | opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.dangerous-subprocess-use-audit |
pistol/pwr.py:70 | Detected subprocess function 'list2cmdline' without a static string. If this data can be controlled by a malicious actor, it may be an instance of command injection. Audit the use of this call to ensure it is not controllable by an... | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| high | opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.dangerous-subprocess-use-audit |
pistol/req.py:433 | Detected subprocess function 'run' without a static string. If this data can be controlled by a malicious actor, it may be an instance of command injection. Audit the use of this call to ensure it is not controllable by an external... | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| high | opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.dangerous-subprocess-use-audit |
pistol/req.py:522 | Detected subprocess function 'run' without a static string. If this data can be controlled by a malicious actor, it may be an instance of command injection. Audit the use of this call to ensure it is not controllable by an external... | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| high | opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.dangerous-subprocess-use-audit |
pistol/req.py:789 | Detected subprocess function 'run' without a static string. If this data can be controlled by a malicious actor, it may be an instance of command injection. Audit the use of this call to ensure it is not controllable by an external... | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| high | opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.dangerous-subprocess-use-audit |
pistol/windows_explorer.py:77 | Detected subprocess function 'STARTUPINFO' without a static string. If this data can be controlled by a malicious actor, it may be an instance of command injection. Audit the use of this call to ensure it is not controllable by an... | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| high | opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.dangerous-subprocess-use-audit |
pistol/windows_explorer.py:80 | Detected subprocess function 'run' without a static string. If this data can be controlled by a malicious actor, it may be an instance of command injection. Audit the use of this call to ensure it is not controllable by an external... | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| high | opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.dangerous-subprocess-use-tainted-env-args |
pistol/windows_explorer.py:81 | Detected subprocess function 'run' with user controlled data. A malicious actor could leverage this to perform command injection. You may consider using 'shlex.quote()'. [confidence medium] | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| high | opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.dangerous-subprocess-use-audit |
pistol/wsl/bootstrap.py:105 | Detected subprocess function 'run' without a static string. If this data can be controlled by a malicious actor, it may be an instance of command injection. Audit the use of this call to ensure it is not controllable by an external... | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| high | opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.dangerous-subprocess-use-audit |
pistol/wsl/bootstrap.py:110 | Detected subprocess function 'run' without a static string. If this data can be controlled by a malicious actor, it may be an instance of command injection. Audit the use of this call to ensure it is not controllable by an external... | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| high | opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.dangerous-subprocess-use-audit |
pistol/wsl/bootstrap.py:113 | Detected subprocess function 'run' without a static string. If this data can be controlled by a malicious actor, it may be an instance of command injection. Audit the use of this call to ensure it is not controllable by an external... | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| high | opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.dangerous-subprocess-use-audit |
pistol/wsl/bootstrap.py:118 | Detected subprocess function 'run' without a static string. If this data can be controlled by a malicious actor, it may be an instance of command injection. Audit the use of this call to ensure it is not controllable by an external... | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| high | opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.dangerous-subprocess-use-audit |
pistol/wsl/bootstrap.py:133 | Detected subprocess function 'Popen' without a static string. If this data can be controlled by a malicious actor, it may be an instance of command injection. Audit the use of this call to ensure it is not controllable by an external... | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| high | opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.dangerous-asyncio-create-exec-audit |
pistol/wsl/services.py:7 | Detected 'create_subprocess_exec' function without a static string. If this data can be controlled by a malicious actor, it may be an instance of command injection. Audit the use of this call to ensure it is not controllable by an... | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| high | opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.dangerous-os-exec-audit |
pistol/wsl/terminal.py:110 | Found dynamic content when spawning a process. This is dangerous if external data can reach this function call because it allows a malicious actor to execute commands. Ensure no external data reaches here. [confidence low] | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| high | opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.dangerous-os-exec-tainted-env-args |
pistol/wsl/terminal.py:110 | Found user controlled content when spawning a process. This is dangerous because it allows a malicious actor to execute commands. [confidence medium] | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| high | opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.dangerous-subprocess-use-audit |
pistol/wsl/terminal.py:21 | Detected subprocess function 'Popen' without a static string. If this data can be controlled by a malicious actor, it may be an instance of command injection. Audit the use of this call to ensure it is not controllable by an external... | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| high | opengrep/javascript.lang.security.detect-insecure-websocket |
pistol/wsl/web/app.js:86 | Insecure WebSocket Detected. WebSocket Secure (wss) should be used for all WebSocket connections. [confidence low] | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| medium | opengrep/python.lang.maintainability.is-function-without-parentheses |
pistol/lecap_proxy.py:132 | Is "is_loopback" a function or an attribute? If it is a function, you may have meant ipaddress.ip_address(remote).is_loopback() because ipaddress.ip_address(remote).is_loopback is always true. | Lint |
| medium | opengrep/python.lang.maintainability.is-function-without-parentheses |
pistol/lecap_proxy.py:53 | Is "is_loopback" a function or an attribute? If it is a function, you may have meant ip.is_loopback() because ip.is_loopback is always true. | Lint |
| medium | opengrep/python.lang.maintainability.useless-literal |
pistol/req.py:27 | key `"dotenv"` is uselessly assigned twice | Lint |
| medium | opengrep/python.lang.maintainability.useless-literal |
pistol/req.py:40 | key `"dotenv"` is uselessly assigned twice | Lint |
| medium | opengrep/javascript.lang.best-practice.javascript-prompt |
pistol/wsl/web/app.js:118 | found prompt() call; should this be in production code? | Lint |
| medium | opengrep/javascript.lang.best-practice.javascript-confirm |
pistol/wsl/web/app.js:119 | found confirm() call; should this be in production code? | Lint |
| medium | opengrep/javascript.lang.best-practice.javascript-prompt |
pistol/wsl/web/app.js:126 | found prompt() call; should this be in production code? | Lint |
| medium | opengrep/javascript.lang.best-practice.javascript-confirm |
pistol/wsl/web/app.js:139 | found confirm() call; should this be in production code? | Lint |
| medium | opengrep/javascript.lang.best-practice.javascript-confirm |
pistol/wsl/web/app.js:144 | found confirm() call; should this be in production code? | Lint |
| medium | opengrep/javascript.lang.best-practice.javascript-confirm |
pistol/wsl/web/app.js:149 | found confirm() call; should this be in production code? | Lint |
| medium | opengrep/javascript.lang.best-practice.javascript-confirm |
pistol/wsl/web/app.js:53 | found confirm() call; should this be in production code? | Lint |
| medium | opengrep/javascript.lang.best-practice.javascript-confirm |
pistol/wsl/web/app.js:57 | found confirm() call; should this be in production code? | Lint |
| medium | opengrep/javascript.lang.best-practice.javascript-confirm |
pistol/wsl/web/app.js:97 | found confirm() call; should this be in production code? | Lint |
| medium | opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.insecure-transport.ssl.no-set-ciphers |
pistol/certificates.py:172 | The 'ssl' module disables insecure cipher suites by default. Therefore, use of 'set_ciphers()' should only be used when you have very specialized requirements. Otherwise, you risk lowering the security of the SSL channel. [confidence low] | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| medium | opengrep/python.cryptography.security.insecure-hash-algorithm-sha1 |
pistol/certificates.py:202 | Detected SHA1 hash algorithm which is considered insecure. SHA1 is not collision resistant and is therefore not suitable as a cryptographic signature. Use SHA256 or SHA3 instead. [confidence medium] | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| medium | opengrep/python.django.security.injection.tainted-url-host |
pistol/wsl/server.py:43 | User data flows into the host portion of this manually-constructed URL. This could allow an attacker to send data to their own server, potentially exposing sensitive data such as cookies or authorization information sent with this... | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| medium | opengrep/javascript.jquery.security.audit.jquery-insecure-method |
pistol/wsl/web/app.js:161 | User controlled data in a jQuery's `.append(...)` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| medium | opengrep/javascript.jquery.security.audit.jquery-insecure-method |
pistol/wsl/web/app.js:165 | User controlled data in a jQuery's `.append(...)` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| medium | opengrep/javascript.jquery.security.audit.jquery-insecure-selector |
pistol/wsl/web/app.js:32 | User controlled data in a `$(...)` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| medium | opengrep/javascript.jquery.security.audit.jquery-insecure-method |
pistol/wsl/web/app.js:33 | User controlled data in a jQuery's `.append(...)` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| medium | opengrep/javascript.jquery.security.audit.jquery-insecure-method |
pistol/wsl/web/app.js:46 | User controlled data in a jQuery's `.append(...)` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| medium | opengrep/javascript.jquery.security.audit.jquery-insecure-selector |
pistol/wsl/web/app.js:65 | User controlled data in a `$(...)` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| medium | opengrep/javascript.jquery.security.audit.jquery-insecure-selector |
pistol/wsl/web/app.js:65 | User controlled data in a `$(...)` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| low | gitleaks/generic-api-key |
pistol/lecap.py:87 | Possible generic-api-key secret in the current tree | Secrets (gitleaks) |
| low | gitleaks/generic-api-key |
pistol/wsl/web/vendor/xterm.js:1 | Possible generic-api-key secret in the current tree | Secrets (gitleaks) |
Tools and coverage
Every analyzer that ran on this commit. A failed or skipped tool is a coverage gap: its share of the score is left out and the coverage figure drops.
| Analyzer | Pillar | Status | Version | Findings | Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI tool configuration | AI provenance | ok | signatures-v1 | 0 | |
| Explicit AI attribution | AI provenance | ok | signatures-v1 | 0 | |
| Release velocity | AI provenance | skipped | — | 0 | |
| Coding style | AI provenance | ok | — | 0 | |
| Commit velocity | AI provenance | ok | prov-4 | 0 | |
| Complexity (lizard) | Code quality | ok | lizard 1.25.1 | 0 | |
| Documentation | Code quality | ok | — | 0 | |
| Duplication (jscpd) | Code quality | ok | repotrust-dup-w6 | 0 | |
| Lint | Code quality | ok | opengrep 1.33.1; rules f1d2b562b414 | 24 | |
| Tests and CI | Code quality | ok | — | 0 | |
| Type safety | Code quality | ok | — | 0 | |
| CI workflows (zizmor) | Security | skipped | — | 0 | |
| Dependencies (osv-scanner) | Security | skipped | — | 0 | |
| Release downloads | Security | ok | — | 0 | |
| Security posture | Security | ok | — | 0 | |
| Package registries | Security | ok | — | 0 | |
| Static analysis (opengrep) | Security | ok | opengrep 1.33.1; rules f1d2b562b414 | 34 | |
| OpenSSF Scorecard | Security | skipped | — | 0 | no published OpenSSF Scorecard result for this repo |
| Secrets (gitleaks) | Security | ok | gitleaks 8.30.1 | 2 |
Score history
Scores from different scoring versions aren't directly comparable.
| Scored | Commit | Scoring | AI provenance | Quality | Security |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-11-14 | 961d8b5d5883 | prov-5+qual-2+sec-2 | 0% | 47 | 60 |
| 2026-11-14 | 961d8b5d5883 | prov-4+qual-2+sec-2 | 0% | 47 | 60 |
Full text report
- Repository: https://github.com/rellek550/Pistol-CLI
- Commit:
961d8b5d588361735a4ce18db29a1af1dbfc5e9a - Generated: 2026-11-14T14:52:07+00:00
- Scorer 0.1.0, scoring prov-5+qual-2+sec-2, report schema v2
Scores
| Pillar | Score | Signal | Confidence | Coverage |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI provenance (estimated AI-generated share) | 0 | possible | 47% | 100% |
| Code quality | 47 | poor | 90% | 100% |
| Security | 60 | weak | 85% | 100% |
AI provenance
Weak signals consistent with AI-assisted development.
- Explicitly attributed share (lower bound): 0.0%
- Unattributed share in AI-consistent velocity bursts: 61.5%
- Estimated AI-generated share: 0.0%
| Month | Lines added | Attributed to AI |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-10 | 12,209 | 0% |
Evidence
- 7,512 lines of first-party code in ~4.0h (1,878 lines/hour, 1 commit session) (58dde428df4d)
AI provenance describes how code was produced; it is not a quality judgment. Unless attribution is explicit, these are signals consistent with AI generation, not proof. Squash/rebase workflows, imported code, and rewritten history reduce accuracy.
Code quality
Code quality is poor: test-to-source ratio 0.28, no CI test run detected; 42% of function code in complex or long functions; 2% duplicated lines. Weakest area: lint.
| Area | Score |
|---|---|
| Complexity (lizard) | 28 |
| Duplication | 90 |
| Code smells (Opengrep) | 25 |
| Tests and CI | 44 |
| Documentation | 65 |
| Type safety | 40 |
| Process (Scorecard review/maintenance) | n/a |
- Functions: 398; mean complexity 5.8, 90th percentile 13; 30 complex and 3 long functions
- Duplicated lines: 1.8% of 6,729 compared
- Tests: 2,584 test lines for 9,239 source lines (ratio 0.28); CI test commands: none detected; 50% of recent source commits also change tests
- Docs missing or thin: contributing, changelog
Most complex functions:
- dispatch in pistol/cli.py: complexity 166, 886 lines
- run in pistol/doctor.py: complexity 64, 101 lines
- handler_for.forward in pistol/lecap_proxy.py: complexity 43, 64 lines
- access in pistol/access_commands.py: complexity 40, 68 lines
- run in pistol/shrimp.py: complexity 30, 54 lines
Security
Security posture is weak: 24 high-severity SAST findings. Weakest area: posture.
| Area | Score |
|---|---|
| Secrets (gitleaks, tree + history) | 94 |
| Static analysis (Opengrep) | 38 |
| Vulnerable dependencies (OSV) | n/a |
| CI workflows (zizmor) | n/a |
| Posture (policy, updates, signing, lockfiles) | 20 |
| OpenSSF Scorecard | n/a |
- Posture checks passed: signed commits, lockfiles; missing: security policy, dependency updates
Top findings
| Severity | Finding | Location |
|---|---|---|
| high | opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.dangerous-subprocess-use-audit: Detected subprocess function 'run' without a static string. If this data can be controlled by a malicious actor, it may be an instance of command injection. Audit the use of this call to ensure it is not controllable by an external resource. You may consider using 'shlex.escape()'. [confidence low] |
pistol/doctor.py:121 |
| high | opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.dangerous-subprocess-use-audit: Detected subprocess function 'run' without a static string. If this data can be controlled by a malicious actor, it may be an instance of command injection. Audit the use of this call to ensure it is not controllable by an external resource. You may consider using 'shlex.escape()'. [confidence low] |
pistol/doctor.py:136 |
| high | opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.dangerous-subprocess-use-audit: Detected subprocess function 'list2cmdline' without a static string. If this data can be controlled by a malicious actor, it may be an instance of command injection. Audit the use of this call to ensure it is not controllable by an external resource. You may consider using 'shlex.escape()'. [confidence low] |
pistol/explorer.py:66 |
| high | opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.dangerous-subprocess-use-audit: Detected subprocess function 'run' without a static string. If this data can be controlled by a malicious actor, it may be an instance of command injection. Audit the use of this call to ensure it is not controllable by an external resource. You may consider using 'shlex.escape()'. [confidence low] |
pistol/fire.py:125 |
| high | opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.dangerous-subprocess-use-audit: Detected subprocess function 'Popen' without a static string. If this data can be controlled by a malicious actor, it may be an instance of command injection. Audit the use of this call to ensure it is not controllable by an external resource. You may consider using 'shlex.escape()'. [confidence low] |
pistol/fire.py:178 |
| high | opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.dangerous-subprocess-use-audit: Detected subprocess function 'Popen' without a static string. If this data can be controlled by a malicious actor, it may be an instance of command injection. Audit the use of this call to ensure it is not controllable by an external resource. You may consider using 'shlex.escape()'. [confidence low] |
pistol/lecap_runtime.py:219 |
| high | opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.dangerous-subprocess-use-audit: Detected subprocess function 'run' without a static string. If this data can be controlled by a malicious actor, it may be an instance of command injection. Audit the use of this call to ensure it is not controllable by an external resource. You may consider using 'shlex.escape()'. [confidence low] |
pistol/medic.py:103 |
| high | opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.dangerous-subprocess-use-audit: Detected subprocess function 'list2cmdline' without a static string. If this data can be controlled by a malicious actor, it may be an instance of command injection. Audit the use of this call to ensure it is not controllable by an external resource. You may consider using 'shlex.escape()'. [confidence low] |
pistol/pwr.py:70 |
| high | opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.dangerous-subprocess-use-audit: Detected subprocess function 'run' without a static string. If this data can be controlled by a malicious actor, it may be an instance of command injection. Audit the use of this call to ensure it is not controllable by an external resource. You may consider using 'shlex.escape()'. [confidence low] |
pistol/req.py:433 |
| high | opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.dangerous-subprocess-use-audit: Detected subprocess function 'run' without a static string. If this data can be controlled by a malicious actor, it may be an instance of command injection. Audit the use of this call to ensure it is not controllable by an external resource. You may consider using 'shlex.escape()'. [confidence low] |
pistol/req.py:522 |
| high | opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.dangerous-subprocess-use-audit: Detected subprocess function 'run' without a static string. If this data can be controlled by a malicious actor, it may be an instance of command injection. Audit the use of this call to ensure it is not controllable by an external resource. You may consider using 'shlex.escape()'. [confidence low] |
pistol/req.py:789 |
| high | opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.dangerous-subprocess-use-audit: Detected subprocess function 'STARTUPINFO' without a static string. If this data can be controlled by a malicious actor, it may be an instance of command injection. Audit the use of this call to ensure it is not controllable by an external resource. You may consider using 'shlex.escape()'. [confidence low] |
pistol/windows_explorer.py:77 |
| high | opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.dangerous-subprocess-use-audit: Detected subprocess function 'run' without a static string. If this data can be controlled by a malicious actor, it may be an instance of command injection. Audit the use of this call to ensure it is not controllable by an external resource. You may consider using 'shlex.escape()'. [confidence low] |
pistol/windows_explorer.py:80 |
| high | opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.dangerous-subprocess-use-tainted-env-args: Detected subprocess function 'run' with user controlled data. A malicious actor could leverage this to perform command injection. You may consider using 'shlex.quote()'. [confidence medium] |
pistol/windows_explorer.py:81 |
| high | opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.dangerous-subprocess-use-audit: Detected subprocess function 'run' without a static string. If this data can be controlled by a malicious actor, it may be an instance of command injection. Audit the use of this call to ensure it is not controllable by an external resource. You may consider using 'shlex.escape()'. [confidence low] |
pistol/wsl/bootstrap.py:105 |
| high | opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.dangerous-subprocess-use-audit: Detected subprocess function 'run' without a static string. If this data can be controlled by a malicious actor, it may be an instance of command injection. Audit the use of this call to ensure it is not controllable by an external resource. You may consider using 'shlex.escape()'. [confidence low] |
pistol/wsl/bootstrap.py:110 |
| high | opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.dangerous-subprocess-use-audit: Detected subprocess function 'run' without a static string. If this data can be controlled by a malicious actor, it may be an instance of command injection. Audit the use of this call to ensure it is not controllable by an external resource. You may consider using 'shlex.escape()'. [confidence low] |
pistol/wsl/bootstrap.py:113 |
| high | opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.dangerous-subprocess-use-audit: Detected subprocess function 'run' without a static string. If this data can be controlled by a malicious actor, it may be an instance of command injection. Audit the use of this call to ensure it is not controllable by an external resource. You may consider using 'shlex.escape()'. [confidence low] |
pistol/wsl/bootstrap.py:118 |
| high | opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.dangerous-subprocess-use-audit: Detected subprocess function 'Popen' without a static string. If this data can be controlled by a malicious actor, it may be an instance of command injection. Audit the use of this call to ensure it is not controllable by an external resource. You may consider using 'shlex.escape()'. [confidence low] |
pistol/wsl/bootstrap.py:133 |
| high | opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.dangerous-asyncio-create-exec-audit: Detected 'create_subprocess_exec' function without a static string. If this data can be controlled by a malicious actor, it may be an instance of command injection. Audit the use of this call to ensure it is not controllable by an external resource. You may consider using 'shlex.escape()'. [confidence low] |
pistol/wsl/services.py:7 |
| high | opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.dangerous-subprocess-use-audit: Detected subprocess function 'Popen' without a static string. If this data can be controlled by a malicious actor, it may be an instance of command injection. Audit the use of this call to ensure it is not controllable by an external resource. You may consider using 'shlex.escape()'. [confidence low] |
pistol/wsl/terminal.py:21 |
| high | opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.dangerous-os-exec-audit: Found dynamic content when spawning a process. This is dangerous if external data can reach this function call because it allows a malicious actor to execute commands. Ensure no external data reaches here. [confidence low] |
pistol/wsl/terminal.py:110 |
| high | opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.dangerous-os-exec-tainted-env-args: Found user controlled content when spawning a process. This is dangerous because it allows a malicious actor to execute commands. [confidence medium] |
pistol/wsl/terminal.py:110 |
| high | opengrep/javascript.lang.security.detect-insecure-websocket: Insecure WebSocket Detected. WebSocket Secure (wss) should be used for all WebSocket connections. [confidence low] |
pistol/wsl/web/app.js:86 |
| medium | opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.insecure-transport.ssl.no-set-ciphers: The 'ssl' module disables insecure cipher suites by default. Therefore, use of 'set_ciphers()' should only be used when you have very specialized requirements. Otherwise, you risk lowering the security of the SSL channel. [confidence low] |
pistol/certificates.py:172 |
Static signals only: the scorer never runs the project's code. Secret findings are pattern matches that were not verified, and secret values are never stored.
Repository profile
- Source lines: 9,239; test lines: 2,584
| Language | Lines |
|---|---|
| Python | 10,648 |
| PowerShell | 999 |
| JavaScript | 176 |