Leaderboard github.com
rcrowley/goagain
Zero-downtime restarts in Go
AI provenance
0%
none-detected
- Confidence
- 54%
- Coverage
- 100%
Estimated share of AI-generated code. Explicit attribution is a lower bound.
Code quality
47/100
poor
- Confidence
- 90%
- Coverage
- 100%
Complexity, duplication, lint density, tests, CI, docs and review process.
Security
66/100
weak
- Confidence
- 85%
- Coverage
- 100%
Secrets, static analysis, vulnerable dependencies, CI and supply-chain posture.
AI provenance
0% none-detected
No AI attribution or AI-consistent velocity signals detected.
How the score is built
- Explicitly attributed share0%
- Unattributed share in AI-pace bursts0%
- Estimated AI-generated share0%
- AI tool configuration files0
- Work sessions at AI pace0
- Releases at AI pacenot measured
- Coding-style index (1.0+ means possible)0.00
Lines added per month all AI-attributed share
- 2011-08163 · 0% AI
- 2011-099 · 0% AI
- 2011-1159 · 0% AI
- 2012-0233 · 0% AI
- 2013-03119 · 0% AI
- 2013-069 · 0% AI
- 2013-0845 · 0% AI
- 2013-0921 · 0% AI
- 2013-11656 · 0% AI
- 2014-018 · 0% AI
- 2014-044 · 0% AI
Evidence by analyzer
Explicit AI attributionok
- attributed_commit_share
- 0.0%
- attributed_commits
- 0
- attributed_loc
- 0
- attributed_loc_share
- 0.0%
- commits
- 57
- effective_loc
- 1,126
- tools_detected
- 0
AI tool configurationok
- artifacts
- 0
- tools_configured
- 0
- workflow_agents
- 0
Commit velocityok
- excluded_import_loc
- 0
- flagged_loc
- 0
- flagged_loc_share
- 0.0%
- flagged_units
- 0
- max_loc_per_hour
- 59
- measured_loc
- 1,126
- median_loc_per_hour
- 41.70
- pr_timed_units
- 0
- pre_ai_era_burst_loc
- 0
- pre_ai_era_bursts
- 0
- pre_ai_era_measured_loc
- 1,126
- work_units
- 26
Release velocityskipped
Coding styleok
- count:assistant_voice
- 0
- count:emoji_in_code
- 0
- count:narrated_steps
- 0
- count:placeholder
- 0
- files:assistant_voice
- 0
- files:emoji_in_code
- 0
- files:narrated_steps
- 0
- files:placeholder
- 0
- index
- 0
- lines_scanned
- 625
- per_kloc:assistant_voice
- 0
- per_kloc:emoji_in_code
- 0
- per_kloc:narrated_steps
- 0
- per_kloc:placeholder
- 0
Code quality
47 poor
Code quality is poor: test-to-source ratio 0.00, no CI test run detected; 0% of function code in complex or long functions; 17% duplicated lines. Weakest area: testing.
How the score is built
- Complexity100
- Duplication35
- Lint and smells94
- Tests and CI0
- Documentation45
- Type safetynot measured
- Review process5
Evidence by analyzer
Complexity (lizard)ok
- complex_functions
- 0
- function_nloc
- 357
- functions
- 20
- long_functions
- 0
- many_param_functions
- 0
- mean_ccn
- 4.45
- p90_ccn
- 10
- risky_nloc_share
- 0.0%
Duplication (jscpd)ok3 items
- 6+ duplicated lines: example/double/main.go:25 and example/single/main.go:20
- 6+ duplicated lines: example/double/main.go:26 and example/legacy/main.go:22
- 6+ duplicated lines: example/legacy/main.go:6 and example/single/main.go:6
- compared_lines
- 432
- duplicated_lines
- 75
- duplicated_share
- 17.4%
- files
- 6
Lintok
- category:correctness
- 1
- findings
- 1
- scanned_lines
- 625
- weighted_findings
- 0.25
Tests and CIok
- check:ci_present
- no
- check:ci_runs_lint
- no
- check:ci_runs_tests
- no
- check:has_tests
- no
- check:test_ratio
- no
- check:tests_cochange
- no
- ci_files
- 0
- cochange_commits
- 48
- cochange_share
- 0.0%
- source_lines
- 625
- test_lines
- 0
- test_ratio
- 0
Documentationok2 items
- README.md
README.md - LICENSE
LICENSE
- check:changelog
- no
- check:contributing
- no
- check:license
- yes
- check:readme
- no
- readme_lines
- 14
Type safetyskipped
Security
66 weak
Security posture is weak: 1 high-severity SAST findings. Weakest area: posture.
How the score is built
- Secrets100
- Static analysis (SAST)77
- Vulnerable dependenciesnot measured
- CI workflowsnot measured
- Security posture0
- OpenSSF Scorecard25
Evidence by analyzer
OpenSSF Scorecardok9 items
- Scorecard Code-Review: 1/10 (Found 3/28 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1)
- Scorecard Binary-Artifacts: 10/10 (no binaries found in the repo)
- Scorecard Maintained: 0/10 (0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0)
- Scorecard CII-Best-Practices: 0/10 (no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected)
- Scorecard Security-Policy: 0/10 (security policy file not detected)
- Scorecard Fuzzing: 0/10 (project is not fuzzed)
- Scorecard License: 9/10 (license file detected)
- Scorecard Branch-Protection: 0/10 (branch protection not enabled on development/release branches)
- Scorecard SAST: 0/10 (SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0)
- aggregate
- 2.10
- check:Binary-Artifacts
- yes
- check:Branch-Protection
- no
- check:CII-Best-Practices
- no
- check:Code-Review
- yes
- check:Fuzzing
- no
- check:License
- yes
- check:Maintained
- no
- check:SAST
- no
- check:Security-Policy
- no
Package registriesskipped
no registry dependencies declared
Secrets (gitleaks)ok
- secrets_current
- 0
- secrets_history
- 0
- secrets_low_confidence
- 0
- secrets_nonprod
- 0
Static analysis (opengrep)ok
- findings
- 1
- findings_high
- 1
- findings_low
- 0
- findings_medium
- 0
- parse_errors
- 0
- scanned_lines
- 625
- weighted_findings
- 0.75
Dependencies (osv-scanner)skipped
CI workflows (zizmor)skipped
Security postureok
- check:dependency_updates
- no
- check:lockfiles
- yes
- check:security_policy
- no
- check:signed_commits
- no
- signed_commit_share
- 3.5%
- unpinned_manifests
- 0
Release downloadsok
- binary_assets
- 0
- signals
- 0
- suspicious
- 0
Findings
1 high1 low
2 findings
| Severity | Rule | Location | Message | Tool |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| high | opengrep/go.lang.security.audit.dangerous-syscall-exec |
goagain.go:73 | Detected non-static command inside Exec. Audit the input to 'syscall.Exec'. If unverified user data can reach this call site, this is a code injection vulnerability. A malicious actor can inject a malicious script to execute arbitrary... | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| low | opengrep/bash.lang.correctness.unquoted-variable-expansion-in-command |
test.sh:16 | Variable expansions must be double-quoted so as to prevent being split into multiple pieces according to whitespace or whichever separator is specified by the IFS variable. If you really wish to split the variable's contents, you may... | Lint |
Tools and coverage
Every analyzer that ran on this commit. A failed or skipped tool is a coverage gap: its share of the score is left out and the coverage figure drops.
| Analyzer | Pillar | Status | Version | Findings | Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI tool configuration | AI provenance | ok | signatures-v1 | 0 | |
| Explicit AI attribution | AI provenance | ok | signatures-v1 | 0 | |
| Release velocity | AI provenance | skipped | — | 0 | |
| Coding style | AI provenance | ok | — | 0 | |
| Commit velocity | AI provenance | ok | prov-4 | 0 | |
| Complexity (lizard) | Code quality | ok | lizard 1.25.1 | 0 | |
| Documentation | Code quality | ok | — | 0 | |
| Duplication (jscpd) | Code quality | ok | repotrust-dup-w6 | 0 | |
| Lint | Code quality | ok | opengrep 1.33.1; rules f1d2b562b414 | 1 | |
| Tests and CI | Code quality | ok | — | 0 | |
| Type safety | Code quality | skipped | — | 0 | |
| CI workflows (zizmor) | Security | skipped | — | 0 | |
| Dependencies (osv-scanner) | Security | skipped | — | 0 | |
| Release downloads | Security | ok | — | 0 | |
| Security posture | Security | ok | — | 0 | |
| Package registries | Security | skipped | — | 0 | no registry dependencies declared |
| Static analysis (opengrep) | Security | ok | opengrep 1.33.1; rules f1d2b562b414 | 1 | |
| OpenSSF Scorecard | Security | ok | scorecard v5.6.0 | 0 | |
| Secrets (gitleaks) | Security | ok | gitleaks 8.30.1 | 0 |
Score history
Scores from different scoring versions aren't directly comparable.
| Scored | Commit | Scoring | AI provenance | Quality | Security |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-11-14 | f2f192b5d1a9 | prov-5+qual-2+sec-2 | 0% | 47 | 66 |
| 2026-11-14 | f2f192b5d1a9 | prov-4+qual-2+sec-2 | 0% | 47 | 66 |
Full text report
- Repository: https://github.com/rcrowley/goagain
- Commit:
f2f192b5d1a96e21dd4026ce67cda85e49659a48 - Generated: 2026-11-14T14:52:07+00:00
- Scorer 0.1.0, scoring prov-5+qual-2+sec-2, report schema v2
Scores
| Pillar | Score | Signal | Confidence | Coverage |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI provenance (estimated AI-generated share) | 0 | none-detected | 54% | 100% |
| Code quality | 47 | poor | 90% | 100% |
| Security | 66 | weak | 85% | 100% |
AI provenance
No AI attribution or AI-consistent velocity signals detected.
- Explicitly attributed share (lower bound): 0.0%
- Unattributed share in AI-consistent velocity bursts: 0.0%
- Estimated AI-generated share: 0.0%
| Month | Lines added | Attributed to AI |
|---|---|---|
| 2011-08 | 163 | 0% |
| 2011-09 | 9 | 0% |
| 2011-11 | 59 | 0% |
| 2012-02 | 33 | 0% |
| 2013-03 | 119 | 0% |
| 2013-06 | 9 | 0% |
| 2013-08 | 45 | 0% |
| 2013-09 | 21 | 0% |
| 2013-11 | 656 | 0% |
| 2014-01 | 8 | 0% |
| 2014-04 | 4 | 0% |
AI provenance describes how code was produced; it is not a quality judgment. Unless attribution is explicit, these are signals consistent with AI generation, not proof. Squash/rebase workflows, imported code, and rewritten history reduce accuracy.
Code quality
Code quality is poor: test-to-source ratio 0.00, no CI test run detected; 0% of function code in complex or long functions; 17% duplicated lines. Weakest area: testing.
| Area | Score |
|---|---|
| Complexity (lizard) | 100 |
| Duplication | 35 |
| Code smells (Opengrep) | 94 |
| Tests and CI | 0 |
| Documentation | 45 |
| Type safety | n/a |
| Process (Scorecard review/maintenance) | 5 |
- Functions: 20; mean complexity 4.5, 90th percentile 10; 0 complex and 0 long functions
- Duplicated lines: 17.4% of 432 compared
- Tests: 0 test lines for 625 source lines (ratio 0.00); CI test commands: none detected; 0% of recent source commits also change tests
- Docs missing or thin: readme, contributing, changelog
Security
Security posture is weak: 1 high-severity SAST findings. Weakest area: posture.
| Area | Score |
|---|---|
| Secrets (gitleaks, tree + history) | 100 |
| Static analysis (Opengrep) | 77 |
| Vulnerable dependencies (OSV) | n/a |
| CI workflows (zizmor) | n/a |
| Posture (policy, updates, signing, lockfiles) | 0 |
| OpenSSF Scorecard | 25 |
- Posture checks passed: lockfiles; missing: security policy, dependency updates, signed commits
- OpenSSF Scorecard aggregate: 2.1/10 (published 2026-10-19)
Top findings
| Severity | Finding | Location |
|---|---|---|
| high | opengrep/go.lang.security.audit.dangerous-syscall-exec: Detected non-static command inside Exec. Audit the input to 'syscall.Exec'. If unverified user data can reach this call site, this is a code injection vulnerability. A malicious actor can inject a malicious script to execute arbitrary code. [confidence low] |
goagain.go:73 |
Static signals only: the scorer never runs the project's code. Secret findings are pattern matches that were not verified, and secret values are never stored.
Repository profile
- Source lines: 625; test lines: 0
| Language | Lines |
|---|---|
| Go | 571 |
| Shell | 54 |