Leaderboard github.com

qiyeboy/IPProxyPool

IPProxyPool代理池项目，提供代理ip

View repository ↗
Python
★ 4,282
commit 127827829535
scored 2026-11-14
scoring prov-5+qual-2+sec-2

AI provenance

none-detected

Confidence: 65%
Coverage: 100%

Estimated share of AI-generated code. Explicit attribution is a lower bound.

Code quality

54/100

weak

Confidence: 90%
Coverage: 100%

Complexity, duplication, lint density, tests, CI, docs and review process.

Security

70/100

adequate

Confidence: 85%
Coverage: 100%

Secrets, static analysis, vulnerable dependencies, CI and supply-chain posture.

Dispute or request a re-score Full report JSON

AI provenance

0% none-detected

No AI attribution or AI-consistent velocity signals detected.

How the score is built

Explicitly attributed share0%
Unattributed share in AI-pace bursts0%
Estimated AI-generated share0%
AI tool configuration files0
Work sessions at AI pace0
Releases at AI pace0
Coding-style index (1.0+ means possible)0.00

Lines added per month all AI-attributed share

2016-071,186 · 0% AI
2016-10195 · 0% AI
2016-11160 · 0% AI
2016-121,527 · 0% AI
2017-011,519 · 0% AI
2017-0277 · 0% AI
2017-03154 · 0% AI
2017-04204 · 0% AI
2017-060 · 0% AI
2017-092 · 0% AI

Evidence by analyzer

Explicit AI attributionok

attributed_commit_share: 0.0%
attributed_commits: 0
attributed_loc: 0
attributed_loc_share: 0.0%
commits: 100
effective_loc: 5,024
tools_detected: 0

AI tool configurationok

artifacts: 0
tools_configured: 0
workflow_agents: 0

Commit velocityok

excluded_import_loc: 0
flagged_loc: 0
flagged_loc_share: 0.0%
flagged_units: 0
max_loc_per_hour: 294
measured_loc: 5,024
median_loc_per_hour: 169.81
pr_timed_units: 0
pre_ai_era_burst_loc: 0
pre_ai_era_bursts: 0
pre_ai_era_measured_loc: 5,024
work_units: 42

Release velocityok

flagged_releases: 0
max_loc_per_day: 6.50
releases: 1

Coding styleok

count:assistant_voice: 0
count:emoji_in_code: 0
count:narrated_steps: 0
count:placeholder: 0
files:assistant_voice: 0
files:emoji_in_code: 0
files:narrated_steps: 0
files:placeholder: 0
index: 0
lines_scanned: 1,457
per_kloc:assistant_voice: 0
per_kloc:emoji_in_code: 0
per_kloc:narrated_steps: 0
per_kloc:placeholder: 0

Code quality

54 weak

Code quality is weak: test-to-source ratio 0.35, no CI test run detected; 0% of function code in complex or long functions; 7% duplicated lines. Weakest area: lint.

How the score is built

Complexity100
Duplication64
Lint and smells15
Tests and CI44
Documentation40
Type safety40
Review processnot measured

Evidence by analyzer

Complexity (lizard)ok

complex_functions: 0
function_nloc: 730
functions: 75
long_functions: 0
many_param_functions: 0
mean_ccn: 3.07
p90_ccn: 7
risky_nloc_share: 0.0%

Duplication (jscpd)ok4 items

compared_lines: 1,096
duplicated_lines: 81
duplicated_share: 7.4%
files: 21

Lintok

category:best-practice: 7
findings: 7
scanned_lines: 1,457
weighted_findings: 11

Tests and CIok

check:ci_present: no
check:ci_runs_lint: no
check:ci_runs_tests: no
check:has_tests: yes
check:test_ratio: no
check:tests_cochange: no
ci_files: 0
cochange_commits: 57
cochange_share: 15.8%
source_lines: 1,457
test_lines: 509
test_ratio: 0.35

Documentationok1 item

README.md README.md

check:changelog: no
check:contributing: no
check:license: no
check:readme: yes
readme_lines: 307

Type safetyok

check:low_escape_density: yes
check:strict_config: no
escapes: 0
escapes_per_kloc: 0

Security

70 adequate

Security posture is adequate: 14 known vulnerabilities in 4 dependencies. Weakest area: posture.

How the score is built

Secrets94
Static analysis (SAST)100
Vulnerable dependencies46
CI workflowsnot measured
Security posture0
OpenSSF Scorecardnot measured

Evidence by analyzer

OpenSSF Scorecardskipped

no published OpenSSF Scorecard result for this repo

Package registriesok

checked: 9
declared: 9
lookup_errors: 0
missing: 0
recent: 0

Secrets (gitleaks)ok

secrets_current: 0
secrets_history: 0
secrets_low_confidence: 0
secrets_nonprod: 2

Static analysis (opengrep)ok

findings: 0
findings_high: 0
findings_low: 0
findings_medium: 0
parse_errors: 0
scanned_lines: 1,457
weighted_findings: 0

Dependencies (osv-scanner)ok

penalty: 46
vulnerabilities: 14
vulnerable_packages: 4
vulns_critical: 3
vulns_high: 3
vulns_low: 0
vulns_medium: 8
vulns_unknown: 0

CI workflows (zizmor)skipped

Security postureok

check:dependency_updates: no
check:lockfiles: yes
check:security_policy: no
check:signed_commits: no
signed_commit_share: 2.0%
unpinned_manifests: 0

Release downloadsok

binary_assets: 0
signals: 0
suspicious: 0

Findings

3 critical5 high13 medium2 low

Severity	Rule	Location	Message	Tool
critical	`osv/GHSA-38fc-9xqv-7f7q`	requirements.txt	[email protected] (PyPI) is affected by PYSEC-2019-124, GHSA-38fc-9xqv-7f7q	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
critical	`osv/GHSA-887w-45rq-vxgf`	requirements.txt	[email protected] (PyPI) is affected by PYSEC-2019-123, GHSA-887w-45rq-vxgf	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
critical	`osv/GHSA-x7m3-jprg-wc5g`	requirements.txt	[email protected] (PyPI) is affected by PYSEC-2023-177, GHSA-x7m3-jprg-wc5g	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
high	`opengrep/python.lang.best-practice.arbitrary-sleep`	spider/ProxyCrawl.py:88	time.sleep() call; did you mean to leave this in?	Lint
high	`opengrep/python.lang.best-practice.open-never-closed`	util/IPAddress.py:17	file object opened without corresponding close	Lint
high	`osv/GHSA-55x5-fj6c-h6m8`	requirements.txt	[email protected] (PyPI) is affected by PYSEC-2021-852, GHSA-55x5-fj6c-h6m8	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
high	`osv/GHSA-vfmq-68hx-4jfw`	requirements.txt	[email protected] (PyPI) is affected by PYSEC-2026-87, GHSA-vfmq-68hx-4jfw	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
high	`osv/GHSA-x84v-xcm2-53pg`	requirements.txt	[email protected] (PyPI) is affected by PYSEC-2018-28, GHSA-x84v-xcm2-53pg	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
medium	`opengrep/python.requests.best-practice.use-raise-for-status`	spider/HtmlDownloader.py:18	There's an HTTP request made with requests, but the raise_for_status() utility method isn't used. This can result in request errors going unnoticed and your code behaving in unexpected ways, such as if your authorization API returns a...	Lint
medium	`opengrep/python.requests.best-practice.use-raise-for-status`	spider/HtmlDownloader.py:38	There's an HTTP request made with requests, but the raise_for_status() utility method isn't used. This can result in request errors going unnoticed and your code behaving in unexpected ways, such as if your authorization API returns a...	Lint
medium	`opengrep/python.requests.best-practice.python.requests.best-practice.use-response-json-shortcut`	validator/Validator.py:146	The requests library has a convenient shortcut for reading JSON responses, which lets you stop worrying about deserializing the response yourself.	Lint
medium	`opengrep/python.requests.best-practice.use-raise-for-status`	validator/Validator.py:208	There's an HTTP request made with requests, but the raise_for_status() utility method isn't used. This can result in request errors going unnoticed and your code behaving in unexpected ways, such as if your authorization API returns a...	Lint
medium	`opengrep/python.requests.best-practice.python.requests.best-practice.use-response-json-shortcut`	validator/Validator.py:209	The requests library has a convenient shortcut for reading JSON responses, which lets you stop worrying about deserializing the response yourself.	Lint
medium	`osv/GHSA-9hjg-9r4m-mvj7`	requirements.txt	[email protected] (PyPI) is affected by PYSEC-2026-1872, GHSA-9hjg-9r4m-mvj7	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
medium	`osv/GHSA-9wx4-h78v-vm56`	requirements.txt	[email protected] (PyPI) is affected by PYSEC-2026-1873, GHSA-9wx4-h78v-vm56	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
medium	`osv/GHSA-gc5v-m9x4-r6x2`	requirements.txt	[email protected] (PyPI) is affected by PYSEC-2026-2275, GHSA-gc5v-m9x4-r6x2	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
medium	`osv/GHSA-j8r2-6x86-q33q`	requirements.txt	[email protected] (PyPI) is affected by PYSEC-2023-74, GHSA-j8r2-6x86-q33q	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
medium	`osv/GHSA-jq4v-f5q6-mjqq`	requirements.txt	[email protected] (PyPI) is affected by PYSEC-2021-19, GHSA-jq4v-f5q6-mjqq	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
medium	`osv/GHSA-pgww-xf46-h92r`	requirements.txt	[email protected] (PyPI) is affected by PYSEC-2020-62, GHSA-pgww-xf46-h92r	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
medium	`osv/GHSA-wrxv-2j5q-m38w`	requirements.txt	[email protected] (PyPI) is affected by PYSEC-2022-230, GHSA-wrxv-2j5q-m38w	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
medium	`osv/GHSA-xp26-p53h-6h2p`	requirements.txt	[email protected] (PyPI) is affected by PYSEC-2018-12, GHSA-xp26-p53h-6h2p	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
low	`gitleaks/generic-api-key`	IPProxyPool_py3/test/testlxml.py:53	Possible generic-api-key secret in history (commit 76d0aeae37); removed from the current tree but still retrievable	Secrets (gitleaks)
low	`gitleaks/generic-api-key`	test/testlxml.py:53	Possible generic-api-key secret in the current tree (test/docs/example file)	Secrets (gitleaks)

Tools and coverage

Every analyzer that ran on this commit. A failed or skipped tool is a coverage gap: its share of the score is left out and the coverage figure drops.

Analyzer	Pillar	Status	Version	Findings	Note
AI tool configuration	AI provenance	ok	`signatures-v1`	0
Explicit AI attribution	AI provenance	ok	`signatures-v1`	0
Release velocity	AI provenance	ok	`prov-4`	0
Coding style	AI provenance	ok	`—`	0
Commit velocity	AI provenance	ok	`prov-4`	0
Complexity (lizard)	Code quality	ok	`lizard 1.25.1`	0
Documentation	Code quality	ok	`—`	0
Duplication (jscpd)	Code quality	ok	`repotrust-dup-w6`	0
Lint	Code quality	ok	`opengrep 1.33.1; rules f1d2b562b414`	7
Tests and CI	Code quality	ok	`—`	0
Type safety	Code quality	ok	`—`	0
CI workflows (zizmor)	Security	skipped	`—`	0
Dependencies (osv-scanner)	Security	ok	`osv-scanner version: 2.7.1`	14
Release downloads	Security	ok	`—`	0
Security posture	Security	ok	`—`	0
Package registries	Security	ok	`—`	0
Static analysis (opengrep)	Security	ok	`opengrep 1.33.1; rules f1d2b562b414`	0
OpenSSF Scorecard	Security	skipped	`—`	0	no published OpenSSF Scorecard result for this repo
Secrets (gitleaks)	Security	ok	`gitleaks 8.30.1`	2

Score history

Scores from different scoring versions aren't directly comparable.

Scored	Commit	Scoring	AI provenance	Quality	Security
2026-11-14	`127827829535`	`prov-5+qual-2+sec-2`	0%	54	70
2026-11-14	`127827829535`	`prov-4+qual-2+sec-2`	0%	54	70

Embed a badge

Maintainers can show these in a README. Badges update when the repository is re-scored.

[![RepoTrust ai](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/badge/github.com/qiyeboy/IPProxyPool/ai.svg)](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/r/github.com/qiyeboy/IPProxyPool/)

[![RepoTrust quality](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/badge/github.com/qiyeboy/IPProxyPool/quality.svg)](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/r/github.com/qiyeboy/IPProxyPool/)

[![RepoTrust security](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/badge/github.com/qiyeboy/IPProxyPool/security.svg)](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/r/github.com/qiyeboy/IPProxyPool/)

Full text report

Repository: https://github.com/qiyeboy/IPProxyPool
Commit: 127827829535641d57a1a05e20523cb0a192170b
Generated: 2026-11-14T14:52:07+00:00
Scorer 0.1.0, scoring prov-5+qual-2+sec-2, report schema v2

Scores

Pillar	Score	Signal	Confidence	Coverage
AI provenance (estimated AI-generated share)	0	none-detected	65%	100%
Code quality	54	weak	90%	100%
Security	70	adequate	85%	100%

AI provenance

No AI attribution or AI-consistent velocity signals detected.

Explicitly attributed share (lower bound): 0.0%
Unattributed share in AI-consistent velocity bursts: 0.0%
Estimated AI-generated share: 0.0%

Month	Lines added	Attributed to AI
2016-07	1,186	0%
2016-10	195	0%
2016-11	160	0%
2016-12	1,527	0%
2017-01	1,519	0%
2017-02	77	0%
2017-03	154	0%
2017-04	204	0%
2017-09	2	0%

AI provenance describes how code was produced; it is not a quality judgment. Unless attribution is explicit, these are signals consistent with AI generation, not proof. Squash/rebase workflows, imported code, and rewritten history reduce accuracy.

Code quality

Code quality is weak: test-to-source ratio 0.35, no CI test run detected; 0% of function code in complex or long functions; 7% duplicated lines. Weakest area: lint.

Area	Score
Complexity (lizard)	100
Duplication	64
Code smells (Opengrep)	15
Tests and CI	44
Documentation	40
Type safety	40
Process (Scorecard review/maintenance)	n/a

Functions: 75; mean complexity 3.1, 90th percentile 7; 0 complex and 0 long functions
Duplicated lines: 7.4% of 1,096 compared
Tests: 509 test lines for 1,457 source lines (ratio 0.35); CI test commands: none detected; 16% of recent source commits also change tests
Docs missing or thin: license, contributing, changelog

Security

Security posture is adequate: 14 known vulnerabilities in 4 dependencies. Weakest area: posture.

Area	Score
Secrets (gitleaks, tree + history)	94
Static analysis (Opengrep)	100
Vulnerable dependencies (OSV)	46
CI workflows (zizmor)	n/a
Posture (policy, updates, signing, lockfiles)	0
OpenSSF Scorecard	n/a

Known vulnerabilities: 14 in 4 packages (critical 3, high 3, medium 8, low 0)
Posture checks passed: lockfiles; missing: security policy, dependency updates, signed commits

Top findings

Severity	Finding	Location
critical	`osv/GHSA-887w-45rq-vxgf`: [email protected] (PyPI) is affected by PYSEC-2019-123, GHSA-887w-45rq-vxgf	requirements.txt
critical	`osv/GHSA-38fc-9xqv-7f7q`: [email protected] (PyPI) is affected by PYSEC-2019-124, GHSA-38fc-9xqv-7f7q	requirements.txt
critical	`osv/GHSA-x7m3-jprg-wc5g`: [email protected] (PyPI) is affected by PYSEC-2023-177, GHSA-x7m3-jprg-wc5g	requirements.txt
high	`osv/GHSA-55x5-fj6c-h6m8`: [email protected] (PyPI) is affected by PYSEC-2021-852, GHSA-55x5-fj6c-h6m8	requirements.txt
high	`osv/GHSA-vfmq-68hx-4jfw`: [email protected] (PyPI) is affected by PYSEC-2026-87, GHSA-vfmq-68hx-4jfw	requirements.txt
high	`osv/GHSA-x84v-xcm2-53pg`: [email protected] (PyPI) is affected by PYSEC-2018-28, GHSA-x84v-xcm2-53pg	requirements.txt
medium	`osv/GHSA-xp26-p53h-6h2p`: [email protected] (PyPI) is affected by PYSEC-2018-12, GHSA-xp26-p53h-6h2p	requirements.txt
medium	`osv/GHSA-pgww-xf46-h92r`: [email protected] (PyPI) is affected by PYSEC-2020-62, GHSA-pgww-xf46-h92r	requirements.txt
medium	`osv/GHSA-jq4v-f5q6-mjqq`: [email protected] (PyPI) is affected by PYSEC-2021-19, GHSA-jq4v-f5q6-mjqq	requirements.txt
medium	`osv/GHSA-wrxv-2j5q-m38w`: [email protected] (PyPI) is affected by PYSEC-2022-230, GHSA-wrxv-2j5q-m38w	requirements.txt
medium	`osv/GHSA-j8r2-6x86-q33q`: [email protected] (PyPI) is affected by PYSEC-2023-74, GHSA-j8r2-6x86-q33q	requirements.txt
medium	`osv/GHSA-9hjg-9r4m-mvj7`: [email protected] (PyPI) is affected by PYSEC-2026-1872, GHSA-9hjg-9r4m-mvj7	requirements.txt
medium	`osv/GHSA-9wx4-h78v-vm56`: [email protected] (PyPI) is affected by PYSEC-2026-1873, GHSA-9wx4-h78v-vm56	requirements.txt
medium	`osv/GHSA-gc5v-m9x4-r6x2`: [email protected] (PyPI) is affected by PYSEC-2026-2275, GHSA-gc5v-m9x4-r6x2	requirements.txt
low	`gitleaks/generic-api-key`: Possible generic-api-key secret in the current tree (test/docs/example file)	test/testlxml.py:53
low	`gitleaks/generic-api-key`: Possible generic-api-key secret in history (commit 76d0aeae37); removed from the current tree but still retrievable	IPProxyPool_py3/test/testlxml.py:53

Static signals only: the scorer never runs the project's code. Secret findings are pattern matches that were not verified, and secret values are never stored.

Repository profile

Source lines: 1,457; test lines: 509

Language	Lines
Python	1,966