Leaderboard github.com

pzfreo/wormgear

A tool for creating 3D models of worm gears

View repository ↗
Python
★ 7
commit b2e287f9717c
scored 2026-11-14
scoring prov-5+qual-2+sec-2

AI provenance

74%

explicit

Confidence: 95%
Coverage: 100%

Estimated share of AI-generated code. Explicit attribution is a lower bound.

Code quality

68/100

adequate

Confidence: 90%
Coverage: 100%

Complexity, duplication, lint density, tests, CI, docs and review process.

Security

66/100

weak

Confidence: 85%
Coverage: 100%

Secrets, static analysis, vulnerable dependencies, CI and supply-chain posture.

Dispute or request a re-score Full report JSON

AI provenance

74% explicit

Explicit AI attribution on 74% of first-party code added; an estimated 74% including velocity signals.

How the score is built

Explicitly attributed share74%
Unattributed share in AI-pace bursts23%
Estimated AI-generated share74%
AI tool configuration files1
Work sessions at AI pace3
Releases at AI pace0
Coding-style index (1.0+ means possible)1.00

Attributed AI tools

Tool	Commits	Lines added	First seen	Last seen
Claude Code	222	50,324	2026-01-17	2026-06-11

Lines added per month all AI-attributed share

2026-0149,436 · 65% AI
2026-0212,815 · 99% AI
2026-030 · 0% AI
2026-055,269 · 100% AI
2026-0661 · 100% AI
2026-0859 · 0% AI

Findings in AI-attributed lines vs the rest

From git blame: 19,649 lines trace to AI-attributed commits, 769 to others. Reported, not scored.

Findings per 1,000 lines	AI-attributed	Other	Ratio
Code quality	2.19	10.40	0.21×
Security	1.02	0.00	—

Evidence by analyzer

Explicit AI attributionok26 items

attributed_commit_share: 68.9%
attributed_commits: 222
attributed_loc: 50,324
attributed_loc_share: 74.4%
commits: 322
effective_loc: 67,640
tools_detected: 1

AI tool configurationok1 item

CLAUDE.md (claude-code configuration)

artifacts: 1
earliest_adoption: 2026-01-17
tools_configured: 1
workflow_agents: 0

Commit velocityok3 items

excluded_import_loc: 0
flagged_loc: 24,994
flagged_loc_share: 37.0%
flagged_units: 3
max_loc_per_hour: 2,176.98
measured_loc: 67,552
median_loc_per_hour: 190.59
pr_timed_units: 122
pre_ai_era_burst_loc: 0
pre_ai_era_bursts: 0
pre_ai_era_measured_loc: 0
work_units: 137

Release velocityok

flagged_releases: 0
max_loc_per_day: 11,792.40
releases: 55

Coding styleok

count:assistant_voice: 0
count:emoji_in_code: 41
count:narrated_steps: 0
count:placeholder: 0
files:assistant_voice: 0
files:emoji_in_code: 8
files:narrated_steps: 0
files:placeholder: 0
index: 1.00
lines_scanned: 20,418
per_kloc:assistant_voice: 0
per_kloc:emoji_in_code: 2.01
per_kloc:narrated_steps: 0
per_kloc:placeholder: 0

Findings in AI-written linesok

ai_lines: 19,649
blame_failures: 0
files_blamed: 55
other_lines: 769
quality:ai_findings: 43
quality:ai_per_kloc: 2.19
quality:other_findings: 8
quality:other_per_kloc: 10.40
quality:ratio: 0.21
security:ai_findings: 20
security:ai_per_kloc: 1.02
security:other_findings: 0
security:other_per_kloc: 0

Code quality

68 adequate

Code quality is adequate: test-to-source ratio 0.63, CI runs tests; 36% of function code in complex or long functions; 8% duplicated lines. Weakest area: complexity.

How the score is built

Complexity34
Duplication60
Lint and smells48
Tests and CI100
Documentation85
Type safety99
Review processnot measured

Evidence by analyzer

Complexity (lizard)ok10 items

complex_functions: 35
function_nloc: 10,720
functions: 438
long_functions: 12
many_param_functions: 19
mean_ccn: 5.80
p90_ccn: 13
risky_nloc_share: 35.7%

Duplication (jscpd)ok10 items

compared_lines: 15,233
duplicated_lines: 1,276
duplicated_share: 8.4%
files: 55

Lintok

category:best-practice: 17
category:correctness: 18
category:maintainability: 16
findings: 51
scanned_lines: 20,418
weighted_findings: 59.50

Tests and CIok6 items

CI config: .github/workflows/ci.yml .github/workflows/ci.yml
CI config: .github/workflows/deploy-web.yml .github/workflows/deploy-web.yml
CI config: .github/workflows/publish.yml .github/workflows/publish.yml
CI config: .github/workflows/test-web-build.yml .github/workflows/test-web-build.yml
CI runs tests (pytest)
CI runs linters (ruff, mypy, black --check)

check:ci_present: yes
check:ci_runs_lint: yes
check:ci_runs_tests: yes
check:has_tests: yes
check:test_ratio: yes
check:tests_cochange: yes
ci_files: 4
cochange_commits: 180
cochange_share: 27.2%
source_lines: 20,418
test_lines: 12,779
test_ratio: 0.63

Documentationok3 items

README.md README.md
LICENSE LICENSE
CHANGELOG.md CHANGELOG.md

check:changelog: yes
check:contributing: no
check:license: yes
check:readme: yes
readme_lines: 134

Type safetyok1 item

Python strict type checking: pyproject.toml pyproject.toml

check:low_escape_density: yes
check:strict_config: no
escapes: 42
escapes_per_kloc: 2.68

Security

66 weak

Security posture is weak: 5 known vulnerabilities in 2 dependencies; 8 high-severity SAST findings; 24 high-severity workflow issues. Weakest area: ci actions.

How the score is built

Secrets100
Static analysis (SAST)86
Vulnerable dependencies77
CI workflows1
Security posture20
OpenSSF Scorecardnot measured

Evidence by analyzer

OpenSSF Scorecardskipped

no published OpenSSF Scorecard result for this repo

Package registriesok

checked: 11
declared: 11
lookup_errors: 0
missing: 0
recent: 0

Secrets (gitleaks)ok

secrets_current: 0
secrets_history: 0
secrets_low_confidence: 0
secrets_nonprod: 0

Static analysis (opengrep)ok

findings: 20
findings_high: 8
findings_low: 0
findings_medium: 12
parse_errors: 0
scanned_lines: 20,418
weighted_findings: 9

Dependencies (osv-scanner)ok

penalty: 16
vulnerabilities: 5
vulnerable_packages: 2
vulns_critical: 0
vulns_high: 4
vulns_low: 0
vulns_medium: 1
vulns_unknown: 0

CI workflows (zizmor)ok

findings: 41
findings_high: 24
findings_low: 8
findings_medium: 9
penalty: 312
workflows: 4

Security postureok

check:dependency_updates: no
check:lockfiles: yes
check:security_policy: no
check:signed_commits: yes
signed_commit_share: 90.0%
unpinned_manifests: 0

Release downloadsok

binary_assets: 0
signals: 0
suspicious: 0

Findings

44 high55 medium18 low

Severity	Rule	Location	Message	Tool
high	`opengrep/python.lang.correctness.tempfile.tempfile-without-flush`	src/wormgear/core/geometry_repair.py:108	Using 'f.name' without '.flush()' or '.close()' may cause an error because the file may not exist when 'f.name' is used. Use '.flush()' or close the file before using 'f.name'.	Lint
high	`opengrep/python.lang.correctness.tempfile.tempfile-without-flush`	src/wormgear/core/geometry_repair.py:151	Using 'f.name' without '.flush()' or '.close()' may cause an error because the file may not exist when 'f.name' is used. Use '.flush()' or close the file before using 'f.name'.	Lint
high	`opengrep/python.lang.correctness.tempfile.tempfile-without-flush`	src/wormgear/core/worm.py:901	Using 'f.name' without '.flush()' or '.close()' may cause an error because the file may not exist when 'f.name' is used. Use '.flush()' or close the file before using 'f.name'.	Lint
high	`opengrep/python.lang.correctness.tempfile.tempfile-without-flush`	src/wormgear/io/package.py:107	Using 'tmp.name' without '.flush()' or '.close()' may cause an error because the file may not exist when 'tmp.name' is used. Use '.flush()' or close the file before using 'tmp.name'.	Lint
high	`opengrep/python.lang.correctness.tempfile.tempfile-without-flush`	src/wormgear/io/package.py:142	Using 'tmp.name' without '.flush()' or '.close()' may cause an error because the file may not exist when 'tmp.name' is used. Use '.flush()' or close the file before using 'tmp.name'.	Lint
high	`opengrep/python.lang.correctness.tempfile.tempfile-without-flush`	src/wormgear/io/package.py:187	Using 'tmp.name' without '.flush()' or '.close()' may cause an error because the file may not exist when 'tmp.name' is used. Use '.flush()' or close the file before using 'tmp.name'.	Lint
high	`opengrep/python.lang.correctness.tempfile.tempfile-without-flush`	src/wormgear/io/package.py:69	Using 'tmp.name' without '.flush()' or '.close()' may cause an error because the file may not exist when 'tmp.name' is used. Use '.flush()' or close the file before using 'tmp.name'.	Lint
high	`opengrep/python.lang.correctness.tempfile.tempfile-without-flush`	src/wormgear/io/package.py:85	Using 'tmp.name' without '.flush()' or '.close()' may cause an error because the file may not exist when 'tmp.name' is used. Use '.flush()' or close the file before using 'tmp.name'.	Lint
high	`zizmor/unpinned-uses`	.github/workflows/ci.yml:102	unpinned action reference [confidence high]	CI workflows (zizmor)
high	`zizmor/unpinned-uses`	.github/workflows/ci.yml:119	unpinned action reference [confidence high]	CI workflows (zizmor)
high	`zizmor/unpinned-uses`	.github/workflows/ci.yml:122	unpinned action reference [confidence high]	CI workflows (zizmor)
high	`zizmor/unpinned-uses`	.github/workflows/ci.yml:140	unpinned action reference [confidence high]	CI workflows (zizmor)
high	`zizmor/unpinned-uses`	.github/workflows/ci.yml:143	unpinned action reference [confidence high]	CI workflows (zizmor)
high	`zizmor/unpinned-uses`	.github/workflows/ci.yml:17	unpinned action reference [confidence high]	CI workflows (zizmor)
high	`zizmor/unpinned-uses`	.github/workflows/ci.yml:20	unpinned action reference [confidence high]	CI workflows (zizmor)
high	`zizmor/unpinned-uses`	.github/workflows/ci.yml:49	unpinned action reference [confidence high]	CI workflows (zizmor)
high	`zizmor/unpinned-uses`	.github/workflows/ci.yml:61	unpinned action reference [confidence high]	CI workflows (zizmor)
high	`zizmor/unpinned-uses`	.github/workflows/ci.yml:64	unpinned action reference [confidence high]	CI workflows (zizmor)
high	`zizmor/unpinned-uses`	.github/workflows/ci.yml:99	unpinned action reference [confidence high]	CI workflows (zizmor)
high	`zizmor/unpinned-uses`	.github/workflows/deploy-web.yml:31	unpinned action reference [confidence high]	CI workflows (zizmor)
high	`zizmor/unpinned-uses`	.github/workflows/deploy-web.yml:34	unpinned action reference [confidence high]	CI workflows (zizmor)
high	`zizmor/unpinned-uses`	.github/workflows/deploy-web.yml:55	unpinned action reference [confidence high]	CI workflows (zizmor)
high	`zizmor/unpinned-uses`	.github/workflows/deploy-web.yml:61	unpinned action reference [confidence high]	CI workflows (zizmor)
high	`zizmor/unpinned-uses`	.github/workflows/publish.yml:12	unpinned action reference [confidence high]	CI workflows (zizmor)
high	`zizmor/unpinned-uses`	.github/workflows/publish.yml:15	unpinned action reference [confidence high]	CI workflows (zizmor)
high	`zizmor/unpinned-uses`	.github/workflows/publish.yml:26	unpinned action reference [confidence high]	CI workflows (zizmor)
high	`zizmor/unpinned-uses`	.github/workflows/publish.yml:53	unpinned action reference [confidence high]	CI workflows (zizmor)
high	`zizmor/unpinned-uses`	.github/workflows/publish.yml:59	unpinned action reference [confidence high]	CI workflows (zizmor)
high	`zizmor/unpinned-uses`	.github/workflows/publish.yml:89	unpinned action reference [confidence high]	CI workflows (zizmor)
high	`zizmor/unpinned-uses`	.github/workflows/publish.yml:95	unpinned action reference [confidence high]	CI workflows (zizmor)
high	`zizmor/unpinned-uses`	.github/workflows/test-web-build.yml:22	unpinned action reference [confidence high]	CI workflows (zizmor)
high	`zizmor/unpinned-uses`	.github/workflows/test-web-build.yml:25	unpinned action reference [confidence high]	CI workflows (zizmor)
high	`opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-document-method`	web/app.js:407	User controlled data in methods like `innerHTML`, `outerHTML` or `document.write` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low]	Static analysis (opengrep)
high	`opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-innerhtml`	web/app.js:407	User controlled data in a `container.innerHTML` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low]	Static analysis (opengrep)
high	`opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-document-method`	web/app.js:712	User controlled data in methods like `innerHTML`, `outerHTML` or `document.write` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low]	Static analysis (opengrep)
high	`opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-innerhtml`	web/app.js:712	User controlled data in a `document.getElementById('spec-sheet').innerHTML` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low]	Static analysis (opengrep)
high	`opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-document-method`	web/modules/bore-calculator.js:58	User controlled data in methods like `innerHTML`, `outerHTML` or `document.write` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low]	Static analysis (opengrep)
high	`opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-innerhtml`	web/modules/bore-calculator.js:58	User controlled data in a `el.innerHTML` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low]	Static analysis (opengrep)
high	`opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-document-method`	web/modules/generator-ui.js:132	User controlled data in methods like `innerHTML`, `outerHTML` or `document.write` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low]	Static analysis (opengrep)
high	`opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-innerhtml`	web/modules/generator-ui.js:132	User controlled data in a `summary.innerHTML` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low]	Static analysis (opengrep)
high	`osv/GHSA-2883-xcg3-v3hh`	web/package-lock.json	[email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-2883-xcg3-v3hh	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
high	`osv/GHSA-52cp-r559-cp3m`	web/package-lock.json	[email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-52cp-r559-cp3m	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
high	`osv/GHSA-5p4m-2wfm-xmqj`	web/package-lock.json	[email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-5p4m-2wfm-xmqj	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
high	`osv/GHSA-r5fr-rjxr-66jc`	web/package-lock.json	[email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-r5fr-rjxr-66jc	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
medium	`opengrep/python.lang.maintainability.is-function-without-parentheses`	scripts/compare_step.py:73	Is "is_valid" a function or an attribute? If it is a function, you may have meant part.is_valid() because part.is_valid is always true.	Lint
medium	`opengrep/python.lang.best-practice.unspecified-open-encoding`	scripts/export_sample_gltf.py:99	Missing 'encoding' parameter. 'open()' uses device locale encodings by default, corrupting files with special characters. Specify the encoding to ensure cross-platform support when opening files in text mode (e.g. encoding="utf-8").	Lint
medium	`opengrep/python.lang.maintainability.is-function-without-parentheses`	scripts/generate_comparison_steps.py:61	Is "is_valid" a function or an attribute? If it is a function, you may have meant solid.is_valid() because solid.is_valid is always true.	Lint
medium	`opengrep/python.lang.best-practice.unspecified-open-encoding`	scripts/generate_schemas.py:125	Missing 'encoding' parameter. 'open()' uses device locale encodings by default, corrupting files with special characters. Specify the encoding to ensure cross-platform support when opening files in text mode (e.g. encoding="utf-8").	Lint
medium	`opengrep/python.lang.best-practice.unspecified-open-encoding`	scripts/generate_schemas.py:74	Missing 'encoding' parameter. 'open()' uses device locale encodings by default, corrupting files with special characters. Specify the encoding to ensure cross-platform support when opening files in text mode (e.g. encoding="utf-8").	Lint
medium	`opengrep/python.lang.best-practice.unspecified-open-encoding`	scripts/generate_schemas.py:95	Missing 'encoding' parameter. 'open()' uses device locale encodings by default, corrupting files with special characters. Specify the encoding to ensure cross-platform support when opening files in text mode (e.g. encoding="utf-8").	Lint
medium	`opengrep/python.lang.best-practice.unspecified-open-encoding`	src/wormgear/cli/generate.py:254	Missing 'encoding' parameter. 'open()' uses device locale encodings by default, corrupting files with special characters. Specify the encoding to ensure cross-platform support when opening files in text mode (e.g. encoding="utf-8").	Lint
medium	`opengrep/python.lang.maintainability.is-function-without-parentheses`	src/wormgear/core/features.py:172	Is "is_shaft" a function or an attribute? If it is a function, you may have meant self.is_shaft() because self.is_shaft is always true.	Lint
medium	`opengrep/python.lang.maintainability.is-function-without-parentheses`	src/wormgear/core/features.py:549	Is "is_shaft" a function or an attribute? If it is a function, you may have meant keyway.is_shaft() because keyway.is_shaft is always true.	Lint
medium	`opengrep/python.lang.maintainability.useless-if-body`	src/wormgear/core/features.py:549	Useless if statement; both blocks have the same body	Lint
medium	`opengrep/python.lang.maintainability.is-function-without-parentheses`	src/wormgear/core/geometry_repair.py:114	Is "is_valid" a function or an attribute? If it is a function, you may have meant reimported.is_valid() because reimported.is_valid is always true.	Lint
medium	`opengrep/python.lang.maintainability.is-function-without-parentheses`	src/wormgear/core/geometry_repair.py:47	Is "is_valid" a function or an attribute? If it is a function, you may have meant part.is_valid() because part.is_valid is always true.	Lint
medium	`opengrep/python.lang.maintainability.is-function-without-parentheses`	src/wormgear/core/geometry_repair.py:59	Is "is_valid" a function or an attribute? If it is a function, you may have meant result.is_valid() because result.is_valid is always true.	Lint
medium	`opengrep/python.lang.maintainability.is-function-without-parentheses`	src/wormgear/core/geometry_repair.py:89	Is "is_valid" a function or an attribute? If it is a function, you may have meant result.is_valid() because result.is_valid is always true.	Lint
medium	`opengrep/python.lang.maintainability.is-function-without-parentheses`	src/wormgear/core/geometry_repair.py:99	Is "is_valid" a function or an attribute? If it is a function, you may have meant result.is_valid() because result.is_valid is always true.	Lint
medium	`opengrep/python.lang.best-practice.logging-error-without-handling`	src/wormgear/core/globoid_worm.py:513	Errors should only be logged when handled. The code logs the error and propogates the exception, consider reducing the level to warning or info.	Lint
medium	`opengrep/python.lang.best-practice.logging-error-without-handling`	src/wormgear/core/globoid_worm.py:960	Errors should only be logged when handled. The code logs the error and propogates the exception, consider reducing the level to warning or info.	Lint
medium	`opengrep/python.lang.maintainability.is-function-without-parentheses`	src/wormgear/core/rim_thickness.py:222	Is "is_valid" a function or an attribute? If it is a function, you may have meant result.is_valid() because result.is_valid is always true.	Lint
medium	`opengrep/python.lang.maintainability.is-function-without-parentheses`	src/wormgear/core/virtual_hobbing.py:218	Is "is_shaft" a function or an attribute? If it is a function, you may have meant self.keyway.is_shaft() because self.keyway.is_shaft is always true.	Lint
medium	`opengrep/python.lang.maintainability.is-function-without-parentheses`	src/wormgear/core/wheel.py:110	Is "is_globoid" a function or an attribute? If it is a function, you may have meant self.is_globoid() because self.is_globoid is always true.	Lint
medium	`opengrep/python.lang.maintainability.is-function-without-parentheses`	src/wormgear/core/wheel.py:186	Is "is_globoid" a function or an attribute? If it is a function, you may have meant self.is_globoid() because self.is_globoid is always true.	Lint
medium	`opengrep/python.lang.maintainability.is-function-without-parentheses`	src/wormgear/core/wheel.py:96	Is "is_shaft" a function or an attribute? If it is a function, you may have meant self.keyway.is_shaft() because self.keyway.is_shaft is always true.	Lint
medium	`opengrep/python.lang.maintainability.is-function-without-parentheses`	src/wormgear/core/worm.py:104	Is "is_shaft" a function or an attribute? If it is a function, you may have meant self.keyway.is_shaft() because self.keyway.is_shaft is always true.	Lint
medium	`opengrep/python.lang.best-practice.unspecified-open-encoding`	src/wormgear/io/loaders.py:489	Missing 'encoding' parameter. 'open()' uses device locale encodings by default, corrupting files with special characters. Specify the encoding to ensure cross-platform support when opening files in text mode (e.g. encoding="utf-8").	Lint
medium	`opengrep/python.lang.best-practice.unspecified-open-encoding`	src/wormgear/io/loaders.py:543	Missing 'encoding' parameter. 'open()' uses device locale encodings by default, corrupting files with special characters. Specify the encoding to ensure cross-platform support when opening files in text mode (e.g. encoding="utf-8").	Lint
medium	`opengrep/javascript.lang.best-practice.javascript-alert`	web/app.js:1035	found alert() call; should this be in production code?	Lint
medium	`opengrep/javascript.lang.best-practice.javascript-alert`	web/app.js:1172	found alert() call; should this be in production code?	Lint
medium	`opengrep/javascript.lang.best-practice.javascript-alert`	web/app.js:1264	found alert() call; should this be in production code?	Lint
medium	`opengrep/javascript.lang.best-practice.javascript-alert`	web/app.js:1270	found alert() call; should this be in production code?	Lint
medium	`opengrep/javascript.lang.best-practice.javascript-alert`	web/app.js:940	found alert() call; should this be in production code?	Lint
medium	`opengrep/javascript.lang.best-practice.javascript-alert`	web/app.js:944	found alert() call; should this be in production code?	Lint
medium	`opengrep/javascript.lang.best-practice.javascript-alert`	web/app.js:956	found alert() call; should this be in production code?	Lint
medium	`opengrep/javascript.lang.best-practice.javascript-alert`	web/app.js:961	found alert() call; should this be in production code?	Lint
medium	`zizmor/excessive-permissions`	.github/workflows/ci.yml:1	overly broad permissions [confidence medium]	CI workflows (zizmor)
medium	`zizmor/excessive-permissions`	.github/workflows/ci.yml:10	overly broad permissions [confidence medium]	CI workflows (zizmor)
medium	`zizmor/excessive-permissions`	.github/workflows/ci.yml:116	overly broad permissions [confidence medium]	CI workflows (zizmor)
medium	`zizmor/excessive-permissions`	.github/workflows/ci.yml:137	overly broad permissions [confidence medium]	CI workflows (zizmor)
medium	`zizmor/excessive-permissions`	.github/workflows/ci.yml:58	overly broad permissions [confidence medium]	CI workflows (zizmor)
medium	`zizmor/excessive-permissions`	.github/workflows/ci.yml:96	overly broad permissions [confidence medium]	CI workflows (zizmor)
medium	`zizmor/excessive-permissions`	.github/workflows/publish.yml:1	overly broad permissions [confidence medium]	CI workflows (zizmor)
medium	`zizmor/excessive-permissions`	.github/workflows/publish.yml:9	overly broad permissions [confidence medium]	CI workflows (zizmor)
medium	`zizmor/excessive-permissions`	.github/workflows/test-web-build.yml:18	overly broad permissions [confidence medium]	CI workflows (zizmor)
medium	`opengrep/javascript.lang.security.html-in-template-string`	web/app.js:348	This template literal looks like HTML and has interpolated variables. These variables are not HTML-encoded by default. If the variables contain HTML tags, these may be interpreted by the browser, resulting in cross-site scripting (XSS)....	Static analysis (opengrep)
medium	`opengrep/javascript.lang.security.html-in-template-string`	web/app.js:349	This template literal looks like HTML and has interpolated variables. These variables are not HTML-encoded by default. If the variables contain HTML tags, these may be interpreted by the browser, resulting in cross-site scripting (XSS)....	Static analysis (opengrep)
medium	`opengrep/javascript.lang.security.html-in-template-string`	web/app.js:351	This template literal looks like HTML and has interpolated variables. These variables are not HTML-encoded by default. If the variables contain HTML tags, these may be interpreted by the browser, resulting in cross-site scripting (XSS)....	Static analysis (opengrep)
medium	`opengrep/javascript.lang.security.html-in-template-string`	web/app.js:379	This template literal looks like HTML and has interpolated variables. These variables are not HTML-encoded by default. If the variables contain HTML tags, these may be interpreted by the browser, resulting in cross-site scripting (XSS)....	Static analysis (opengrep)
medium	`opengrep/javascript.lang.security.html-in-template-string`	web/app.js:382	This template literal looks like HTML and has interpolated variables. These variables are not HTML-encoded by default. If the variables contain HTML tags, these may be interpreted by the browser, resulting in cross-site scripting (XSS)....	Static analysis (opengrep)
medium	`opengrep/javascript.lang.security.html-in-template-string`	web/app.js:404	This template literal looks like HTML and has interpolated variables. These variables are not HTML-encoded by default. If the variables contain HTML tags, these may be interpreted by the browser, resulting in cross-site scripting (XSS)....	Static analysis (opengrep)
medium	`opengrep/javascript.lang.security.html-in-template-string`	web/app.js:712	This template literal looks like HTML and has interpolated variables. These variables are not HTML-encoded by default. If the variables contain HTML tags, these may be interpreted by the browser, resulting in cross-site scripting (XSS)....	Static analysis (opengrep)
medium	`opengrep/javascript.lang.security.html-in-template-string`	web/modules/bore-calculator.js:56	This template literal looks like HTML and has interpolated variables. These variables are not HTML-encoded by default. If the variables contain HTML tags, these may be interpreted by the browser, resulting in cross-site scripting (XSS)....	Static analysis (opengrep)
medium	`opengrep/javascript.lang.security.html-in-template-string`	web/modules/format-utils.js:185	This template literal looks like HTML and has interpolated variables. These variables are not HTML-encoded by default. If the variables contain HTML tags, these may be interpreted by the browser, resulting in cross-site scripting (XSS)....	Static analysis (opengrep)
medium	`opengrep/javascript.lang.security.html-in-template-string`	web/modules/format-utils.js:207	This template literal looks like HTML and has interpolated variables. These variables are not HTML-encoded by default. If the variables contain HTML tags, these may be interpreted by the browser, resulting in cross-site scripting (XSS)....	Static analysis (opengrep)
medium	`opengrep/javascript.lang.security.html-in-template-string`	web/modules/generator-ui.js:65	This template literal looks like HTML and has interpolated variables. These variables are not HTML-encoded by default. If the variables contain HTML tags, these may be interpreted by the browser, resulting in cross-site scripting (XSS)....	Static analysis (opengrep)
medium	`opengrep/javascript.lang.security.html-in-template-string`	web/modules/generator-ui.js:68	This template literal looks like HTML and has interpolated variables. These variables are not HTML-encoded by default. If the variables contain HTML tags, these may be interpreted by the browser, resulting in cross-site scripting (XSS)....	Static analysis (opengrep)
medium	`osv/GHSA-f23m-r3pf-42rh`	web/package-lock.json	[email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-f23m-r3pf-42rh	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
low	`opengrep/bash.lang.correctness.unquoted-variable-expansion-in-command`	scripts/publish.sh:57	Variable expansions must be double-quoted so as to prevent being split into multiple pieces according to whitespace or whichever separator is specified by the IFS variable. If you really wish to split the variable's contents, you may...	Lint
low	`opengrep/bash.lang.correctness.unquoted-variable-expansion-in-command`	scripts/publish.sh:76	Variable expansions must be double-quoted so as to prevent being split into multiple pieces according to whitespace or whichever separator is specified by the IFS variable. If you really wish to split the variable's contents, you may...	Lint
low	`opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.missing-template-string-indicator`	web/generator-worker.js:190	This looks like a JavaScript template string. Are you missing a '$' in front of '{...}'?	Lint
low	`opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.missing-template-string-indicator`	web/generator-worker.js:190	This looks like a JavaScript template string. Are you missing a '$' in front of '{...}'?	Lint
low	`opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.missing-template-string-indicator`	web/generator-worker.js:233	This looks like a JavaScript template string. Are you missing a '$' in front of '{...}'?	Lint
low	`opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.missing-template-string-indicator`	web/generator-worker.js:233	This looks like a JavaScript template string. Are you missing a '$' in front of '{...}'?	Lint
low	`opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.missing-template-string-indicator`	web/generator-worker.js:254	This looks like a JavaScript template string. Are you missing a '$' in front of '{...}'?	Lint
low	`opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.missing-template-string-indicator`	web/generator-worker.js:254	This looks like a JavaScript template string. Are you missing a '$' in front of '{...}'?	Lint
low	`opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.missing-template-string-indicator`	web/generator-worker.js:61	This looks like a JavaScript template string. Are you missing a '$' in front of '{...}'?	Lint
low	`opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.missing-template-string-indicator`	web/generator-worker.js:61	This looks like a JavaScript template string. Are you missing a '$' in front of '{...}'?	Lint
low	`zizmor/artipacked`	.github/workflows/ci.yml:119	credential persistence through GitHub Actions artifacts [confidence low]	CI workflows (zizmor)
low	`zizmor/artipacked`	.github/workflows/ci.yml:140	credential persistence through GitHub Actions artifacts [confidence low]	CI workflows (zizmor)
low	`zizmor/artipacked`	.github/workflows/ci.yml:17	credential persistence through GitHub Actions artifacts [confidence low]	CI workflows (zizmor)
low	`zizmor/artipacked`	.github/workflows/ci.yml:61	credential persistence through GitHub Actions artifacts [confidence low]	CI workflows (zizmor)
low	`zizmor/artipacked`	.github/workflows/ci.yml:99	credential persistence through GitHub Actions artifacts [confidence low]	CI workflows (zizmor)
low	`zizmor/artipacked`	.github/workflows/deploy-web.yml:30	credential persistence through GitHub Actions artifacts [confidence low]	CI workflows (zizmor)
low	`zizmor/artipacked`	.github/workflows/publish.yml:12	credential persistence through GitHub Actions artifacts [confidence low]	CI workflows (zizmor)
low	`zizmor/artipacked`	.github/workflows/test-web-build.yml:22	credential persistence through GitHub Actions artifacts [confidence low]	CI workflows (zizmor)

Tools and coverage

Every analyzer that ran on this commit. A failed or skipped tool is a coverage gap: its share of the score is left out and the coverage figure drops.

Analyzer	Pillar	Status	Version	Findings	Note
AI tool configuration	AI provenance	ok	`signatures-v1`	0
Explicit AI attribution	AI provenance	ok	`signatures-v1`	0
Release velocity	AI provenance	ok	`prov-4`	0
Coding style	AI provenance	ok	`—`	0
Commit velocity	AI provenance	ok	`prov-4`	0
Findings in AI-written lines	AI provenance	ok	`git-blame`	0
Complexity (lizard)	Code quality	ok	`lizard 1.25.1`	0
Documentation	Code quality	ok	`—`	0
Duplication (jscpd)	Code quality	ok	`repotrust-dup-w6`	0
Lint	Code quality	ok	`opengrep 1.33.1; rules f1d2b562b414`	51
Tests and CI	Code quality	ok	`—`	0
Type safety	Code quality	ok	`—`	0
CI workflows (zizmor)	Security	ok	`zizmor 1.32.0`	41
Dependencies (osv-scanner)	Security	ok	`osv-scanner version: 2.7.1`	5
Release downloads	Security	ok	`—`	0
Security posture	Security	ok	`—`	0
Package registries	Security	ok	`—`	0
Static analysis (opengrep)	Security	ok	`opengrep 1.33.1; rules f1d2b562b414`	20
OpenSSF Scorecard	Security	skipped	`—`	0	no published OpenSSF Scorecard result for this repo
Secrets (gitleaks)	Security	ok	`gitleaks 8.30.1`	0

Score history

Scores from different scoring versions aren't directly comparable.

Scored	Commit	Scoring	AI provenance	Quality	Security
2026-11-14	`b2e287f9717c`	`prov-5+qual-2+sec-2`	74%	68	66
2026-11-14	`b2e287f9717c`	`prov-4+qual-2+sec-2`	74%	68	66

Embed a badge

Maintainers can show these in a README. Badges update when the repository is re-scored.

[![RepoTrust ai](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/badge/github.com/pzfreo/wormgear/ai.svg)](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/r/github.com/pzfreo/wormgear/)

[![RepoTrust quality](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/badge/github.com/pzfreo/wormgear/quality.svg)](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/r/github.com/pzfreo/wormgear/)

[![RepoTrust security](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/badge/github.com/pzfreo/wormgear/security.svg)](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/r/github.com/pzfreo/wormgear/)

Full text report

Repository: https://github.com/pzfreo/wormgear
Commit: b2e287f9717c851eb2f6dc942f045f72201b6c77
Generated: 2026-11-14T14:52:06+00:00
Scorer 0.1.0, scoring prov-5+qual-2+sec-2, report schema v2

Scores

Pillar	Score	Signal	Confidence	Coverage
AI provenance (estimated AI-generated share)	74	explicit	95%	100%
Code quality	68	adequate	90%	100%
Security	66	weak	85%	100%

AI provenance

Explicit AI attribution on 74% of first-party code added; an estimated 74% including velocity signals.

Explicitly attributed share (lower bound): 74.4%
Unattributed share in AI-consistent velocity bursts: 22.9%
Estimated AI-generated share: 74.4%

AI tool	Attributed commits	Lines added
Claude Code	222	50,324

AI tooling configured in repo: claude-code

Current source lines last changed by AI-attributed commits: 19,649 of 20,418.

Findings per 1,000 lines	AI-attributed	Other	Ratio
Quality	2.188	10.403	0.21x
Security	1.018	0.0	n/a

Stylometry index: 1.00 per 1,000 lines (narrated steps 0, placeholders 0, assistant phrasing 0, emoji 41). Reported as a signal, not scored.

Month	Lines added	Attributed to AI
2026-01	49,436	65%
2026-02	12,815	99%
2026-05	5,269	100%
2026-06	61	100%
2026-08	59	0%

Evidence

Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (f4f85fdfcca5)
Claude Code: trailer 'Co-authored-by: Claude' (d1750b04407a)
Claude Code: trailer 'Co-authored-by: Claude' (f5fc84386025)
Claude Code: trailer 'Co-authored-by: Claude' (c068ab9b8ebc)
Claude Code: PR description attribution (7d288bce80ab)
Claude Code: trailer 'Co-authored-by: Claude' (164b21f16581)
Claude Code: trailer 'Co-authored-by: Claude' (24d43d3cf324)
Claude Code: trailer 'Co-authored-by: Claude' (10bc00ec65de)
Claude Code: trailer 'Co-authored-by: Claude' (0b8e3c889f26)
Claude Code: trailer 'Co-authored-by: Claude' (118660820a0c)
Claude Code: trailer 'Co-authored-by: Claude' (246f594f01e7)
Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (c814a2db9a9f)
Claude Code: trailer 'Co-authored-by: Claude' (78f70afe6bea)
Claude Code: trailer 'Co-authored-by: Claude' (a0f20229a6a4)
Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (bf157a8e3c10)

AI provenance describes how code was produced; it is not a quality judgment. Unless attribution is explicit, these are signals consistent with AI generation, not proof. Squash/rebase workflows, imported code, and rewritten history reduce accuracy.

Code quality

Code quality is adequate: test-to-source ratio 0.63, CI runs tests; 36% of function code in complex or long functions; 8% duplicated lines. Weakest area: complexity.

Area	Score
Complexity (lizard)	34
Duplication	60
Code smells (Opengrep)	48
Tests and CI	100
Documentation	85
Type safety	99
Process (Scorecard review/maintenance)	n/a

Functions: 438; mean complexity 5.8, 90th percentile 13; 35 complex and 12 long functions
Duplicated lines: 8.4% of 15,233 compared
Tests: 12,779 test lines for 20,418 source lines (ratio 0.63); CI test commands: pytest; 27% of recent source commits also change tests
Docs missing or thin: contributing

Most complex functions:

Security

Security posture is weak: 5 known vulnerabilities in 2 dependencies; 8 high-severity SAST findings; 24 high-severity workflow issues. Weakest area: ci actions.

Area	Score
Secrets (gitleaks, tree + history)	100
Static analysis (Opengrep)	86
Vulnerable dependencies (OSV)	77
CI workflows (zizmor)	1
Posture (policy, updates, signing, lockfiles)	20
OpenSSF Scorecard	n/a

Known vulnerabilities: 5 in 2 packages (critical 0, high 4, medium 1, low 0)
Posture checks passed: signed commits, lockfiles; missing: security policy, dependency updates

Top findings

Severity	Finding	Location
high	`opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-document-method`: User controlled data in methods like `innerHTML`, `outerHTML` or `document.write` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low]	web/app.js:407
high	`opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-innerhtml`: User controlled data in a `container.innerHTML` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low]	web/app.js:407
high	`opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-document-method`: User controlled data in methods like `innerHTML`, `outerHTML` or `document.write` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low]	web/app.js:712
high	`opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-innerhtml`: User controlled data in a `document.getElementById('spec-sheet').innerHTML` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low]	web/app.js:712
high	`opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-document-method`: User controlled data in methods like `innerHTML`, `outerHTML` or `document.write` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low]	web/modules/bore-calculator.js:58
high	`opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-innerhtml`: User controlled data in a `el.innerHTML` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low]	web/modules/bore-calculator.js:58
high	`opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-document-method`: User controlled data in methods like `innerHTML`, `outerHTML` or `document.write` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low]	web/modules/generator-ui.js:132
high	`opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-innerhtml`: User controlled data in a `summary.innerHTML` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low]	web/modules/generator-ui.js:132
high	`osv/GHSA-2883-xcg3-v3hh`: [email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-2883-xcg3-v3hh	web/package-lock.json
high	`osv/GHSA-52cp-r559-cp3m`: [email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-52cp-r559-cp3m	web/package-lock.json
high	`osv/GHSA-5p4m-2wfm-xmqj`: [email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-5p4m-2wfm-xmqj	web/package-lock.json
high	`osv/GHSA-r5fr-rjxr-66jc`: [email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-r5fr-rjxr-66jc	web/package-lock.json
high	`zizmor/unpinned-uses`: unpinned action reference [confidence high]	.github/workflows/ci.yml:17
high	`zizmor/unpinned-uses`: unpinned action reference [confidence high]	.github/workflows/ci.yml:20
high	`zizmor/unpinned-uses`: unpinned action reference [confidence high]	.github/workflows/ci.yml:49
high	`zizmor/unpinned-uses`: unpinned action reference [confidence high]	.github/workflows/ci.yml:61
high	`zizmor/unpinned-uses`: unpinned action reference [confidence high]	.github/workflows/ci.yml:64
high	`zizmor/unpinned-uses`: unpinned action reference [confidence high]	.github/workflows/ci.yml:99
high	`zizmor/unpinned-uses`: unpinned action reference [confidence high]	.github/workflows/ci.yml:102
high	`zizmor/unpinned-uses`: unpinned action reference [confidence high]	.github/workflows/ci.yml:119
high	`zizmor/unpinned-uses`: unpinned action reference [confidence high]	.github/workflows/ci.yml:122
high	`zizmor/unpinned-uses`: unpinned action reference [confidence high]	.github/workflows/ci.yml:140
high	`zizmor/unpinned-uses`: unpinned action reference [confidence high]	.github/workflows/ci.yml:143
high	`zizmor/unpinned-uses`: unpinned action reference [confidence high]	.github/workflows/deploy-web.yml:31
high	`zizmor/unpinned-uses`: unpinned action reference [confidence high]	.github/workflows/deploy-web.yml:34

Static signals only: the scorer never runs the project's code. Secret findings are pattern matches that were not verified, and secret values are never stored.

Repository profile

Source lines: 20,418; test lines: 12,779

Language	Lines
Python	27,673
JavaScript	4,891
Shell	392
TypeScript	241