Leaderboard github.com
neveripe/infranim
Animate your cloud infrastructure as code. Converts architecture topologies into cinematic Manim videos.
AI provenance
0%
possible
- Confidence
- 49%
- Coverage
- 100%
Estimated share of AI-generated code. Explicit attribution is a lower bound.
Code quality
77/100
adequate
- Confidence
- 90%
- Coverage
- 100%
Complexity, duplication, lint density, tests, CI, docs and review process.
Security
82/100
adequate
- Confidence
- 85%
- Coverage
- 100%
Secrets, static analysis, vulnerable dependencies, CI and supply-chain posture.
AI provenance
0% possible
Weak signals consistent with AI-assisted development. Comments and strings use phrasing typical of LLM-written code (see the coding style evidence).
How the score is built
- Explicitly attributed share0%
- Unattributed share in AI-pace bursts61%
- Estimated AI-generated share0%
- AI tool configuration files0
- Work sessions at AI pace1
- Releases at AI pacenot measured
- Coding-style index (1.0+ means possible)2.00
Lines added per month all AI-attributed share
- 2026-022,431 · 0% AI
Evidence by analyzer
Explicit AI attributionok
- attributed_commit_share
- 0.0%
- attributed_commits
- 0
- attributed_loc
- 0
- attributed_loc_share
- 0.0%
- commits
- 36
- effective_loc
- 2,431
- tools_detected
- 0
AI tool configurationok
- artifacts
- 0
- tools_configured
- 0
- workflow_agents
- 0
Commit velocityok1 item
- excluded_import_loc
- 0
- flagged_loc
- 1,481
- flagged_loc_share
- 60.9%
- flagged_units
- 1
- max_loc_per_hour
- 736.10
- measured_loc
- 2,431
- median_loc_per_hour
- 148.79
- pr_timed_units
- 0
- pre_ai_era_burst_loc
- 0
- pre_ai_era_bursts
- 0
- pre_ai_era_measured_loc
- 0
- work_units
- 4
Release velocityskipped
Coding styleok1 item
- count:assistant_voice
- 0
- count:emoji_in_code
- 0
- count:narrated_steps
- 0
- count:placeholder
- 1
- files:assistant_voice
- 0
- files:emoji_in_code
- 0
- files:narrated_steps
- 0
- files:placeholder
- 1
- index
- 2
- lines_scanned
- 998
- per_kloc:assistant_voice
- 0
- per_kloc:emoji_in_code
- 0
- per_kloc:narrated_steps
- 0
- per_kloc:placeholder
- 1
Code quality
77 adequate
Code quality is adequate: test-to-source ratio 1.29, no CI test run detected; 0% of function code in complex or long functions; 4% duplicated lines. Weakest area: type safety.
How the score is built
- Complexity100
- Duplication80
- Lint and smells100
- Tests and CI55
- Documentation65
- Type safety40
- Review processnot measured
Evidence by analyzer
Complexity (lizard)ok
- complex_functions
- 0
- function_nloc
- 410
- functions
- 62
- long_functions
- 0
- many_param_functions
- 0
- mean_ccn
- 1.97
- p90_ccn
- 4
- risky_nloc_share
- 0.0%
Duplication (jscpd)ok1 item
- compared_lines
- 662
- duplicated_lines
- 24
- duplicated_share
- 3.6%
- files
- 13
Lintok
- findings
- 0
- scanned_lines
- 998
- weighted_findings
- 0
Tests and CIok
- check:ci_present
- no
- check:ci_runs_lint
- no
- check:ci_runs_tests
- no
- check:has_tests
- yes
- check:test_ratio
- yes
- check:tests_cochange
- yes
- ci_files
- 0
- cochange_commits
- 13
- cochange_share
- 38.5%
- source_lines
- 998
- test_lines
- 1,283
- test_ratio
- 1.29
Documentationok2 items
- README.md
README.md - LICENSE
LICENSE
- check:changelog
- no
- check:contributing
- no
- check:license
- yes
- check:readme
- yes
- readme_lines
- 78
Type safetyok
- check:low_escape_density
- yes
- check:strict_config
- no
- escapes
- 0
- escapes_per_kloc
- 0
Security
82 adequate
Security posture is adequate: no high-impact findings. Weakest area: posture.
How the score is built
- Secrets100
- Static analysis (SAST)100
- Vulnerable dependenciesnot measured
- CI workflowsnot measured
- Security posture0
- OpenSSF Scorecardnot measured
Evidence by analyzer
OpenSSF Scorecardskipped
no published OpenSSF Scorecard result for this repo
Package registriesok
- checked
- 5
- declared
- 5
- lookup_errors
- 0
- missing
- 0
- recent
- 0
Secrets (gitleaks)ok
- secrets_current
- 0
- secrets_history
- 0
- secrets_low_confidence
- 0
- secrets_nonprod
- 0
Static analysis (opengrep)ok
- findings
- 0
- findings_high
- 0
- findings_low
- 0
- findings_medium
- 0
- parse_errors
- 0
- scanned_lines
- 998
- weighted_findings
- 0
Dependencies (osv-scanner)skipped
CI workflows (zizmor)skipped
Security postureok
- check:dependency_updates
- no
- check:lockfiles
- yes
- check:security_policy
- no
- check:signed_commits
- no
- signed_commit_share
- 0.0%
- unpinned_manifests
- 0
Release downloadsok
- binary_assets
- 0
- signals
- 0
- suspicious
- 0
Findings
No line-level findings.
Tools and coverage
Every analyzer that ran on this commit. A failed or skipped tool is a coverage gap: its share of the score is left out and the coverage figure drops.
| Analyzer | Pillar | Status | Version | Findings | Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI tool configuration | AI provenance | ok | signatures-v1 | 0 | |
| Explicit AI attribution | AI provenance | ok | signatures-v1 | 0 | |
| Release velocity | AI provenance | skipped | — | 0 | |
| Coding style | AI provenance | ok | — | 0 | |
| Commit velocity | AI provenance | ok | prov-4 | 0 | |
| Complexity (lizard) | Code quality | ok | lizard 1.25.1 | 0 | |
| Documentation | Code quality | ok | — | 0 | |
| Duplication (jscpd) | Code quality | ok | repotrust-dup-w6 | 0 | |
| Lint | Code quality | ok | opengrep 1.33.1; rules f1d2b562b414 | 0 | |
| Tests and CI | Code quality | ok | — | 0 | |
| Type safety | Code quality | ok | — | 0 | |
| CI workflows (zizmor) | Security | skipped | — | 0 | |
| Dependencies (osv-scanner) | Security | skipped | — | 0 | |
| Release downloads | Security | ok | — | 0 | |
| Security posture | Security | ok | — | 0 | |
| Package registries | Security | ok | — | 0 | |
| Static analysis (opengrep) | Security | ok | opengrep 1.33.1; rules f1d2b562b414 | 0 | |
| OpenSSF Scorecard | Security | skipped | — | 0 | no published OpenSSF Scorecard result for this repo |
| Secrets (gitleaks) | Security | ok | gitleaks 8.30.1 | 0 |
Score history
Scores from different scoring versions aren't directly comparable.
| Scored | Commit | Scoring | AI provenance | Quality | Security |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-11-14 | 3d86f3f3c25e | prov-5+qual-2+sec-2 | 0% | 77 | 82 |
| 2026-11-14 | 3d86f3f3c25e | prov-4+qual-2+sec-2 | 0% | 77 | 82 |
Full text report
- Repository: https://github.com/neveripe/infranim
- Commit:
3d86f3f3c25eaf687010fb32b2ab8d49bcf64a43 - Generated: 2026-11-14T14:52:06+00:00
- Scorer 0.1.0, scoring prov-5+qual-2+sec-2, report schema v2
Scores
| Pillar | Score | Signal | Confidence | Coverage |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI provenance (estimated AI-generated share) | 0 | possible | 49% | 100% |
| Code quality | 77 | adequate | 90% | 100% |
| Security | 82 | adequate | 85% | 100% |
AI provenance
Weak signals consistent with AI-assisted development. Comments and strings use phrasing typical of LLM-written code (see the coding style evidence).
-
Explicitly attributed share (lower bound): 0.0%
-
Unattributed share in AI-consistent velocity bursts: 60.9%
-
Estimated AI-generated share: 0.0%
-
Stylometry index: 2.00 per 1,000 lines (narrated steps 0, placeholders 1, assistant phrasing 0, emoji 0). Reported as a signal, not scored.
| Month | Lines added | Attributed to AI |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-02 | 2,431 | 0% |
Evidence
- 1,481 lines of first-party code in ~2.0h (736 lines/hour, 3 commit session) (87744464599f)
- placeholder or demo-only phrasing: # In a real app we'd project to the bounding box, (spikes/spike)
AI provenance describes how code was produced; it is not a quality judgment. Unless attribution is explicit, these are signals consistent with AI generation, not proof. Squash/rebase workflows, imported code, and rewritten history reduce accuracy.
Code quality
Code quality is adequate: test-to-source ratio 1.29, no CI test run detected; 0% of function code in complex or long functions; 4% duplicated lines. Weakest area: type safety.
| Area | Score |
|---|---|
| Complexity (lizard) | 100 |
| Duplication | 80 |
| Code smells (Opengrep) | 100 |
| Tests and CI | 55 |
| Documentation | 65 |
| Type safety | 40 |
| Process (Scorecard review/maintenance) | n/a |
- Functions: 62; mean complexity 2.0, 90th percentile 4; 0 complex and 0 long functions
- Duplicated lines: 3.6% of 662 compared
- Tests: 1,283 test lines for 998 source lines (ratio 1.29); CI test commands: none detected; 38% of recent source commits also change tests
- Docs missing or thin: contributing, changelog
Security
Security posture is adequate: no high-impact findings. Weakest area: posture.
| Area | Score |
|---|---|
| Secrets (gitleaks, tree + history) | 100 |
| Static analysis (Opengrep) | 100 |
| Vulnerable dependencies (OSV) | n/a |
| CI workflows (zizmor) | n/a |
| Posture (policy, updates, signing, lockfiles) | 0 |
| OpenSSF Scorecard | n/a |
- Posture checks passed: lockfiles; missing: security policy, dependency updates, signed commits
Static signals only: the scorer never runs the project's code. Secret findings are pattern matches that were not verified, and secret values are never stored.
Repository profile
- Source lines: 998; test lines: 1,283
| Language | Lines |
|---|---|
| Python | 2,281 |