Leaderboard github.com

nathaishik/time-table-formaliser

Vibe Coded App 🥀 Needed to make something for creating schedules.

View repository ↗
TypeScript
★ 0
commit c54b7edaeae4
scored 2026-11-14
scoring prov-5+qual-2+sec-2

AI provenance

none-detected

Confidence: 43%
Coverage: 100%

Estimated share of AI-generated code. Explicit attribution is a lower bound.

Code quality

43/100

poor

Confidence: 90%
Coverage: 100%

Complexity, duplication, lint density, tests, CI, docs and review process.

Security

76/100

adequate

Confidence: 85%
Coverage: 100%

Secrets, static analysis, vulnerable dependencies, CI and supply-chain posture.

Dispute or request a re-score Full report JSON

AI provenance

0% none-detected

No AI attribution or AI-consistent velocity signals detected.

How the score is built

Explicitly attributed share0%
Unattributed share in AI-pace bursts0%
Estimated AI-generated share0%
AI tool configuration files0
Work sessions at AI pace0
Releases at AI pacenot measured
Coding-style index (1.0+ means possible)0.00

Lines added per month all AI-attributed share

2026-073,847 · 0% AI

Evidence by analyzer

Explicit AI attributionok

attributed_commit_share: 0.0%
attributed_commits: 0
attributed_loc: 0
attributed_loc_share: 0.0%
commits: 11
effective_loc: 3,847
tools_detected: 0

AI tool configurationok

artifacts: 0
tools_configured: 0
workflow_agents: 0

Commit velocityok

excluded_import_loc: 2,915
flagged_loc: 0
flagged_loc_share: 0.0%
flagged_units: 0
max_loc_per_hour: 155.72
measured_loc: 932
median_loc_per_hour: 92.84
pr_timed_units: 0
pre_ai_era_burst_loc: 0
pre_ai_era_bursts: 0
pre_ai_era_measured_loc: 0
work_units: 6

Release velocityskipped

Coding styleok

count:assistant_voice: 0
count:emoji_in_code: 0
count:narrated_steps: 0
count:placeholder: 0
files:assistant_voice: 0
files:emoji_in_code: 0
files:narrated_steps: 0
files:placeholder: 0
index: 0
lines_scanned: 2,863
per_kloc:assistant_voice: 0
per_kloc:emoji_in_code: 0
per_kloc:narrated_steps: 0
per_kloc:placeholder: 0

Code quality

43 poor

Code quality is poor: test-to-source ratio 0.00, no CI test run detected; 18% of function code in complex or long functions; 3% duplicated lines. Weakest area: type safety.

How the score is built

Complexity58
Duplication81
Lint and smells32
Tests and CI15
Documentation65
Type safety0
Review processnot measured

Evidence by analyzer

Complexity (lizard)ok4 items

complex_functions: 4
function_nloc: 2,196
functions: 172
long_functions: 1
many_param_functions: 0
mean_ccn: 3.48
p90_ccn: 8
risky_nloc_share: 18.1%

Duplication (jscpd)ok2 items

compared_lines: 2,087
duplicated_lines: 72
duplicated_share: 3.5%
files: 30

Lintok

category:best-practice: 4
category:correctness: 10
findings: 14
scanned_lines: 2,863
weighted_findings: 13

Tests and CIok1 item

CI config: .github/workflows/deploy.yml .github/workflows/deploy.yml

check:ci_present: yes
check:ci_runs_lint: no
check:ci_runs_tests: no
check:has_tests: no
check:test_ratio: no
check:tests_cochange: no
ci_files: 1
cochange_commits: 8
cochange_share: 0.0%
source_lines: 2,863
test_lines: 0
test_ratio: 0

Documentationok2 items

README.md README.md
LICENSE LICENSE

check:changelog: no
check:contributing: no
check:license: yes
check:readme: yes
readme_lines: 28

Type safetyok

check:low_escape_density: no
check:strict_config: no
escapes: 32
escapes_per_kloc: 11.26

Security

76 adequate

Security posture is adequate: 15 known vulnerabilities in 7 dependencies. Weakest area: posture.

How the score is built

Secrets100
Static analysis (SAST)100
Vulnerable dependencies43
CI workflows98
Security posture0
OpenSSF Scorecardnot measured

Evidence by analyzer

OpenSSF Scorecardskipped

no published OpenSSF Scorecard result for this repo

Package registriesok

checked: 22
declared: 22
lookup_errors: 0
missing: 0
recent: 0

Secrets (gitleaks)ok

secrets_current: 0
secrets_history: 0
secrets_low_confidence: 0
secrets_nonprod: 0

Static analysis (opengrep)ok

findings: 0
findings_high: 0
findings_low: 0
findings_medium: 0
parse_errors: 0
scanned_lines: 2,863
weighted_findings: 0

Dependencies (osv-scanner)ok

penalty: 51
vulnerabilities: 15
vulnerable_packages: 7
vulns_critical: 0
vulns_high: 9
vulns_low: 1
vulns_medium: 5
vulns_unknown: 0

CI workflows (zizmor)ok

findings: 1
findings_high: 0
findings_low: 0
findings_medium: 1
penalty: 1.20
workflows: 1

Security postureok

check:dependency_updates: no
check:lockfiles: yes
check:security_policy: no
check:signed_commits: no
signed_commit_share: 18.2%
unpinned_manifests: 0

Release downloadsok

binary_assets: 0
signals: 0
suspicious: 0

Findings

10 high15 medium5 low

Severity	Rule	Location	Message	Tool
high	`opengrep/typescript.lang.correctness.useless-ternary`	src/components/ui/GlassCard.tsx:11	It looks like no matter how elevated is evaluated, this expression returns 'card'. This is probably a copy-paste error.	Lint
high	`osv/GHSA-2v37-7h3g-55p8`	package-lock.json	[email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-2v37-7h3g-55p8	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
high	`osv/GHSA-587h-7wmj-h5pm`	package-lock.json	[email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-587h-7wmj-h5pm	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
high	`osv/GHSA-68fv-2mgg-jv7q`	package-lock.json	[email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-68fv-2mgg-jv7q	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
high	`osv/GHSA-6j4f-fj2g-mc7p`	package-lock.json	[email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-6j4f-fj2g-mc7p	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
high	`osv/GHSA-mrhx-c7xc-m3w5`	package-lock.json	[email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-mrhx-c7xc-m3w5	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
high	`osv/GHSA-qhr7-859c-m2p7`	package-lock.json	[email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-qhr7-859c-m2p7	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
high	`osv/GHSA-rgj7-g3m4-5g8c`	package-lock.json	[email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-rgj7-g3m4-5g8c	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
high	`osv/GHSA-rgw5-rvv9-x895`	package-lock.json	[email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-rgw5-rvv9-x895	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
high	`osv/GHSA-wq5f-xc86-pv6w`	package-lock.json	[email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-wq5f-xc86-pv6w	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
medium	`opengrep/typescript.react.best-practice.react-props-in-state`	src/components/DuplicatesReview.tsx:18	Copying a prop into state in React -- this is bad practice as all updates to it are ignored. Instead, read props directly in your component and avoid copying props into state.	Lint
medium	`opengrep/typescript.react.best-practice.react-props-spreading`	src/components/ui/Button.tsx:17	It's best practice to explicitly pass props to an HTML component rather than use the spread operator. The spread operator risks passing invalid HTML props to an HTML element, which can cause console warnings or worse, give malicious...	Lint
medium	`opengrep/typescript.react.best-practice.react-props-spreading`	src/components/ui/Button.tsx:61	It's best practice to explicitly pass props to an HTML component rather than use the spread operator. The spread operator risks passing invalid HTML props to an HTML element, which can cause console warnings or worse, give malicious...	Lint
medium	`opengrep/typescript.react.best-practice.react-props-spreading`	src/components/ui/Button.tsx:86	It's best practice to explicitly pass props to an HTML component rather than use the spread operator. The spread operator risks passing invalid HTML props to an HTML element, which can cause console warnings or worse, give malicious...	Lint
medium	`opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.no-stringify-keys`	src/hooks/useLLM.ts:109	JSON stringify does not produce a stable key ordering, and should not be relied on for producing object keys. Consider using json-stable-stringify instead.	Lint
medium	`opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.no-stringify-keys`	src/hooks/useLLM.ts:129	JSON stringify does not produce a stable key ordering, and should not be relied on for producing object keys. Consider using json-stable-stringify instead.	Lint
medium	`opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.no-stringify-keys`	src/hooks/useLLM.ts:228	JSON stringify does not produce a stable key ordering, and should not be relied on for producing object keys. Consider using json-stable-stringify instead.	Lint
medium	`opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.no-stringify-keys`	src/hooks/useLLM.ts:336	JSON stringify does not produce a stable key ordering, and should not be relied on for producing object keys. Consider using json-stable-stringify instead.	Lint
medium	`opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.no-stringify-keys`	src/hooks/useLLM.ts:97	JSON stringify does not produce a stable key ordering, and should not be relied on for producing object keys. Consider using json-stable-stringify instead.	Lint
medium	`zizmor/artipacked`	.github/workflows/deploy.yml:31	credential persistence through GitHub Actions artifacts [confidence low]	CI workflows (zizmor)
medium	`osv/GHSA-698v-4r3x-3vcv`	package-lock.json	[email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-698v-4r3x-3vcv	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
medium	`osv/GHSA-g3hv-75wg-m249`	package-lock.json	[email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-g3hv-75wg-m249	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
medium	`osv/GHSA-q2hr-2g5m-vwhr`	package-lock.json	[email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-q2hr-2g5m-vwhr	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
medium	`osv/GHSA-r825-w8mm-5pxw`	package-lock.json	[email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-r825-w8mm-5pxw	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
medium	`osv/GHSA-rq7h-c2jc-7f22`	package-lock.json	[email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-rq7h-c2jc-7f22	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
low	`opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.missing-template-string-indicator`	src/hooks/useLLM.ts:164	This looks like a JavaScript template string. Are you missing a '$' in front of '{...}'?	Lint
low	`opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.missing-template-string-indicator`	src/hooks/useLLM.ts:164	This looks like a JavaScript template string. Are you missing a '$' in front of '{...}'?	Lint
low	`opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.missing-template-string-indicator`	src/hooks/useLLM.ts:308	This looks like a JavaScript template string. Are you missing a '$' in front of '{...}'?	Lint
low	`opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.missing-template-string-indicator`	src/hooks/useLLM.ts:308	This looks like a JavaScript template string. Are you missing a '$' in front of '{...}'?	Lint
low	`osv/GHSA-9jrq-w75r-8gcw`	package-lock.json	[email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-9jrq-w75r-8gcw	Dependencies (osv-scanner)

Tools and coverage

Every analyzer that ran on this commit. A failed or skipped tool is a coverage gap: its share of the score is left out and the coverage figure drops.

Analyzer	Pillar	Status	Version	Findings	Note
AI tool configuration	AI provenance	ok	`signatures-v1`	0
Explicit AI attribution	AI provenance	ok	`signatures-v1`	0
Release velocity	AI provenance	skipped	`—`	0
Coding style	AI provenance	ok	`—`	0
Commit velocity	AI provenance	ok	`prov-4`	0
Complexity (lizard)	Code quality	ok	`lizard 1.25.1`	0
Documentation	Code quality	ok	`—`	0
Duplication (jscpd)	Code quality	ok	`repotrust-dup-w6`	0
Lint	Code quality	ok	`opengrep 1.33.1; rules f1d2b562b414`	14
Tests and CI	Code quality	ok	`—`	0
Type safety	Code quality	ok	`—`	0
CI workflows (zizmor)	Security	ok	`zizmor 1.32.0`	1
Dependencies (osv-scanner)	Security	ok	`osv-scanner version: 2.7.1`	15
Release downloads	Security	ok	`—`	0
Security posture	Security	ok	`—`	0
Package registries	Security	ok	`—`	0
Static analysis (opengrep)	Security	ok	`opengrep 1.33.1; rules f1d2b562b414`	0
OpenSSF Scorecard	Security	skipped	`—`	0	no published OpenSSF Scorecard result for this repo
Secrets (gitleaks)	Security	ok	`gitleaks 8.30.1`	0

Score history

Scores from different scoring versions aren't directly comparable.

Scored	Commit	Scoring	AI provenance	Quality	Security
2026-11-14	`c54b7edaeae4`	`prov-5+qual-2+sec-2`	0%	43	76
2026-11-14	`c54b7edaeae4`	`prov-4+qual-2+sec-2`	0%	43	76

Embed a badge

Maintainers can show these in a README. Badges update when the repository is re-scored.

[![RepoTrust ai](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/badge/github.com/nathaishik/time-table-formaliser/ai.svg)](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/r/github.com/nathaishik/time-table-formaliser/)

[![RepoTrust quality](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/badge/github.com/nathaishik/time-table-formaliser/quality.svg)](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/r/github.com/nathaishik/time-table-formaliser/)

[![RepoTrust security](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/badge/github.com/nathaishik/time-table-formaliser/security.svg)](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/r/github.com/nathaishik/time-table-formaliser/)

Full text report

Repository: https://github.com/nathaishik/time-table-formaliser
Commit: c54b7edaeae4dd2907421958241406f07a691515
Generated: 2026-11-14T14:52:06+00:00
Scorer 0.1.0, scoring prov-5+qual-2+sec-2, report schema v2

Scores

Pillar	Score	Signal	Confidence	Coverage
AI provenance (estimated AI-generated share)	0	none-detected	43%	100%
Code quality	43	poor	90%	100%
Security	76	adequate	85%	100%

AI provenance

No AI attribution or AI-consistent velocity signals detected.

Explicitly attributed share (lower bound): 0.0%
Unattributed share in AI-consistent velocity bursts: 0.0%
Estimated AI-generated share: 0.0%

Month	Lines added	Attributed to AI
2026-07	3,847	0%

AI provenance describes how code was produced; it is not a quality judgment. Unless attribution is explicit, these are signals consistent with AI generation, not proof. Squash/rebase workflows, imported code, and rewritten history reduce accuracy.

Code quality

Code quality is poor: test-to-source ratio 0.00, no CI test run detected; 18% of function code in complex or long functions; 3% duplicated lines. Weakest area: type safety.

Area	Score
Complexity (lizard)	58
Duplication	81
Code smells (Opengrep)	32
Tests and CI	15
Documentation	65
Type safety	0
Process (Scorecard review/maintenance)	n/a

Functions: 172; mean complexity 3.5, 90th percentile 8; 4 complex and 1 long functions
Duplicated lines: 3.5% of 2,087 compared
Tests: 0 test lines for 2,863 source lines (ratio 0.00); CI test commands: none detected; 0% of recent source commits also change tests
Docs missing or thin: contributing, changelog

Most complex functions:

Security

Security posture is adequate: 15 known vulnerabilities in 7 dependencies. Weakest area: posture.

Area	Score
Secrets (gitleaks, tree + history)	100
Static analysis (Opengrep)	100
Vulnerable dependencies (OSV)	43
CI workflows (zizmor)	98
Posture (policy, updates, signing, lockfiles)	0
OpenSSF Scorecard	n/a

Known vulnerabilities: 15 in 7 packages (critical 0, high 9, medium 5, low 1)
Posture checks passed: lockfiles; missing: security policy, dependency updates, signed commits

Top findings

Severity	Finding	Location
high	`osv/GHSA-6j4f-fj2g-mc7p`: [email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-6j4f-fj2g-mc7p	package-lock.json
high	`osv/GHSA-qhr7-859c-m2p7`: [email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-qhr7-859c-m2p7	package-lock.json
high	`osv/GHSA-rgw5-rvv9-x895`: [email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-rgw5-rvv9-x895	package-lock.json
high	`osv/GHSA-2v37-7h3g-55p8`: [email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-2v37-7h3g-55p8	package-lock.json
high	`osv/GHSA-rgj7-g3m4-5g8c`: [email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-rgj7-g3m4-5g8c	package-lock.json
high	`osv/GHSA-wq5f-xc86-pv6w`: [email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-wq5f-xc86-pv6w	package-lock.json
high	`osv/GHSA-68fv-2mgg-jv7q`: [email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-68fv-2mgg-jv7q	package-lock.json
high	`osv/GHSA-587h-7wmj-h5pm`: [email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-587h-7wmj-h5pm	package-lock.json
high	`osv/GHSA-mrhx-c7xc-m3w5`: [email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-mrhx-c7xc-m3w5	package-lock.json
medium	`osv/GHSA-q2hr-2g5m-vwhr`: [email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-q2hr-2g5m-vwhr	package-lock.json
medium	`osv/GHSA-g3hv-75wg-m249`: [email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-g3hv-75wg-m249	package-lock.json
medium	`osv/GHSA-698v-4r3x-3vcv`: [email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-698v-4r3x-3vcv	package-lock.json
medium	`osv/GHSA-r825-w8mm-5pxw`: [email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-r825-w8mm-5pxw	package-lock.json
medium	`osv/GHSA-rq7h-c2jc-7f22`: [email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-rq7h-c2jc-7f22	package-lock.json
medium	`zizmor/artipacked`: credential persistence through GitHub Actions artifacts [confidence low]	.github/workflows/deploy.yml:31
low	`osv/GHSA-9jrq-w75r-8gcw`: [email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-9jrq-w75r-8gcw	package-lock.json

Static signals only: the scorer never runs the project's code. Secret findings are pattern matches that were not verified, and secret values are never stored.

Repository profile

Source lines: 2,863; test lines: 0

Language	Lines
TypeScript	2,841
JavaScript	22