Leaderboard github.com
mastifdogo/Bookeeping
AI provenance
100%
explicit
- Confidence
- 90%
- Coverage
- 100%
Estimated share of AI-generated code. Explicit attribution is a lower bound.
Code quality
65/100
weak
- Confidence
- 90%
- Coverage
- 100%
Complexity, duplication, lint density, tests, CI, docs and review process.
Security
78/100
adequate
- Confidence
- 85%
- Coverage
- 100%
Secrets, static analysis, vulnerable dependencies, CI and supply-chain posture.
AI provenance
100% explicit
Explicit AI attribution on 100% of first-party code added; an estimated 100% including velocity signals.
How the score is built
- Explicitly attributed share100%
- Unattributed share in AI-pace bursts0%
- Estimated AI-generated share100%
- AI tool configuration files11
- Work sessions at AI pace7
- Releases at AI pace0
- Coding-style index (1.0+ means possible)0.03
Attributed AI tools
| Tool | Commits | Lines added | First seen | Last seen |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Code | 78 | 41,923 | 2026-10-05 | 2026-11-14 |
Lines added per month all AI-attributed share
- 2026-1024,479 · 100% AI
- 2026-1117,444 · 100% AI
Findings in AI-attributed lines vs the rest
From git blame: 30,060 lines trace to AI-attributed commits, 0 to others. Too few lines in one group for a fair comparison. Reported, not scored.
| Findings per 1,000 lines | AI-attributed | Other | Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|
| Code quality | 1.13 | — | — |
| Security | 0.13 | — | — |
Evidence by analyzer
Explicit AI attributionok26 items
- Claude Code: 78 attributed commits, 41,923 lines added
- Claude Code: author email [email protected]
- Claude Code: author email [email protected]
- Claude Code: author email [email protected]
- Claude Code: author email [email protected]
- Claude Code: author email [email protected]
- Claude Code: author email [email protected]
- Claude Code: author email [email protected]
- Claude Code: author email [email protected]
- Claude Code: author email [email protected]
- Claude Code: author email [email protected]
- Claude Code: author email [email protected]
- Claude Code: author email [email protected]
- Claude Code: author email [email protected]
- Claude Code: author email [email protected]
- Claude Code: author email [email protected]
- Claude Code: author email [email protected]
- Claude Code: author email [email protected]
- Claude Code: author email [email protected]
- Claude Code: author email [email protected]
- Claude Code: author email [email protected]
- Claude Code: author email [email protected]
- Claude Code: author email [email protected]
- Claude Code: author email [email protected]
- Claude Code: author email [email protected]
- Claude Code: author email [email protected]
- attributed_commit_share
- 96.3%
- attributed_commits
- 78
- attributed_loc
- 41,923
- attributed_loc_share
- 100.0%
- commits
- 81
- effective_loc
- 41,923
- tools_detected
- 1
AI tool configurationok11 items
- .claude/skills/ledger-module/SKILL.md (claude-code configuration)
- .claude/skills/ledger-module/scripts/check-module.ts (claude-code configuration)
- .claude/skills/ledger-module/scripts/new-module.sh (claude-code configuration)
- .claude/skills/ledger-module/template/.github/workflows/release.yml (claude-code configuration)
- .claude/skills/ledger-module/template/.gitignore (claude-code configuration)
- .claude/skills/ledger-module/template/README.md (claude-code configuration)
- .claude/skills/ledger-module/template/ledger-module.json (claude-code configuration)
- .claude/skills/ledger-module/template/migrations/001_init.sql (claude-code configuration)
- .claude/skills/ledger-module/template/server.mjs (claude-code configuration)
- .claude/skills/ledger-module/template/ui/index.html (claude-code configuration)
- CLAUDE.md (claude-code configuration)
- artifacts
- 11
- earliest_adoption
- 2026-11-07
- tools_configured
- 1
- workflow_agents
- 0
Commit velocityok7 items
- 6,978 lines of first-party code in ~5.4h (1,301 lines/hour, 5 commit session)
- 2,461 lines of first-party code in ~2.1h (1,190 lines/hour, 5 commit session)
- 1,069 lines of first-party code in ~1.0h (1,121 lines/hour, 1 commit session)
- 3,810 lines of first-party code in ~4.0h (952 lines/hour, 1 commit session)
- 3,795 lines of first-party code in ~4.8h (784 lines/hour, 5 commit session)
- 3,466 lines of first-party code in ~4.8h (724 lines/hour, 3 commit session)
- 2,245 lines of first-party code in ~4.3h (520 lines/hour, 2 commit session)
- excluded_import_loc
- 9,358
- flagged_loc
- 23,824
- flagged_loc_share
- 73.2%
- flagged_units
- 7
- max_loc_per_hour
- 1,300.79
- measured_loc
- 32,565
- median_loc_per_hour
- 361.05
- pr_timed_units
- 0
- pre_ai_era_burst_loc
- 0
- pre_ai_era_bursts
- 0
- pre_ai_era_measured_loc
- 0
- work_units
- 31
Release velocityok
- flagged_releases
- 0
- max_loc_per_day
- 49,704
- releases
- 40
Coding styleok1 item
- count:assistant_voice
- 0
- count:emoji_in_code
- 0
- count:narrated_steps
- 1
- count:placeholder
- 0
- files:assistant_voice
- 0
- files:emoji_in_code
- 0
- files:narrated_steps
- 1
- files:placeholder
- 0
- index
- 0.03
- lines_scanned
- 30,060
- per_kloc:assistant_voice
- 0
- per_kloc:emoji_in_code
- 0
- per_kloc:narrated_steps
- 0.03
- per_kloc:placeholder
- 0
Findings in AI-written linesok
- ai_lines
- 30,060
- blame_failures
- 0
- files_blamed
- 158
- other_lines
- 0
- quality:ai_findings
- 34
- quality:ai_per_kloc
- 1.13
- quality:other_findings
- 0
- security:ai_findings
- 4
- security:ai_per_kloc
- 0.13
- security:other_findings
- 0
Code quality
65 weak
Code quality is weak: test-to-source ratio 0.15, CI runs tests; 22% of function code in complex or long functions; 9% duplicated lines. Weakest area: docs.
How the score is built
- Complexity52
- Duplication58
- Lint and smells80
- Tests and CI73
- Documentation40
- Type safety100
- Review processnot measured
Evidence by analyzer
Complexity (lizard)ok10 items
- buildPlan in backend/src/migrate.ts: complexity 112, 179 lines
- callProvider in backend/src/llm.ts: complexity 61, 100 lines
- parseSettingsSpec in backend/src/module-settings.ts: complexity 59, 58 lines
- cleanMapping in backend/src/migrate.ts: complexity 52, 72 lines
- runBackup in backend/src/backup.ts: complexity 44, 120 lines
- performRestore in backend/src/restore.ts: complexity 43, 133 lines
- (anonymous) in backend/src/llm.ts: complexity 41, 41 lines
- applyConfigChange in backend/src/backup.ts: complexity 40, 44 lines
- decodeUserBody in backend/src/http.ts: complexity 38, 29 lines
- resolve in backend/src/migrate.ts: complexity 37, 32 lines
- complex_functions
- 47
- function_nloc
- 10,562
- functions
- 1,457
- long_functions
- 5
- many_param_functions
- 1
- mean_ccn
- 3.44
- p90_ccn
- 7
- risky_nloc_share
- 21.8%
Duplication (jscpd)ok10 items
- 6+ duplicated lines: backend/src/accounts.ts:36 and backend/src/types.ts:35
- 6+ duplicated lines: backend/src/entities.ts:17 and frontend/src/lib/api/schema.d.ts:1669
- 6+ duplicated lines: backend/src/http.ts:1382 and backend/src/http.ts:1429
- 6+ duplicated lines: backend/src/ledger.ts:316 and backend/src/ledger.ts:378
- 6+ duplicated lines: backend/src/llm.ts:70 and frontend/src/routes/settings/llm/+page.svelte:18
- 6+ duplicated lines: backend/src/reconcile.ts:31 and backend/src/types.ts:149
- 6+ duplicated lines: deploy/create-org-db.sh:14 and deploy/migrate-db.sh:16
- 6+ duplicated lines: deploy/create-org-db.sh:20 and deploy/setup-db.sh:32
- 6+ duplicated lines: frontend/src/lib/api/schema.d.ts:8 and frontend/src/lib/api/schema.d.ts:25
- 6+ duplicated lines: frontend/src/lib/components/ExpenseForm.svelte:136 and frontend/src/routes/entities/+page.svelte:154
- compared_lines
- 23,571
- duplicated_lines
- 2,176
- duplicated_share
- 9.2%
- files
- 158
Lintok
- category:correctness
- 34
- findings
- 34
- scanned_lines
- 29,290
- weighted_findings
- 25.50
Tests and CIok2 items
- CI config: .github/workflows/release.yml
.github/workflows/release.yml - CI runs tests (make test)
- check:ci_present
- yes
- check:ci_runs_lint
- no
- check:ci_runs_tests
- yes
- check:has_tests
- yes
- check:test_ratio
- no
- check:tests_cochange
- yes
- ci_files
- 1
- cochange_commits
- 58
- cochange_share
- 74.1%
- source_lines
- 30,060
- test_lines
- 4,631
- test_ratio
- 0.15
Documentationok1 item
- README.md
README.md
- check:changelog
- no
- check:contributing
- no
- check:license
- no
- check:readme
- yes
- readme_lines
- 349
Type safetyok1 item
- TypeScript strict type checking: backend/tsconfig.json
backend/tsconfig.json
- check:low_escape_density
- yes
- check:strict_config
- yes
- escapes
- 26
- escapes_per_kloc
- 1.27
Security
78 adequate
Security posture is adequate: 9 known vulnerabilities in 4 dependencies; 2 high-severity SAST findings; 3 high-severity workflow issues. Weakest area: posture.
How the score is built
- Secrets100
- Static analysis (SAST)95
- Vulnerable dependencies75
- CI workflows63
- Security posture20
- OpenSSF Scorecardnot measured
Evidence by analyzer
OpenSSF Scorecardskipped
no published OpenSSF Scorecard result for this repo
Package registriesok
- checked
- 13
- declared
- 13
- lookup_errors
- 0
- missing
- 0
- recent
- 0
Secrets (gitleaks)ok
- secrets_current
- 0
- secrets_history
- 0
- secrets_low_confidence
- 0
- secrets_nonprod
- 0
Static analysis (opengrep)ok
- findings
- 4
- findings_high
- 2
- findings_low
- 0
- findings_medium
- 2
- parse_errors
- 5
- scanned_lines
- 29,290
- weighted_findings
- 4.10
Dependencies (osv-scanner)ok
- penalty
- 17
- vulnerabilities
- 9
- vulnerable_packages
- 4
- vulns_critical
- 0
- vulns_high
- 1
- vulns_low
- 1
- vulns_medium
- 7
- vulns_unknown
- 0
CI workflows (zizmor)ok
- findings
- 4
- findings_high
- 3
- findings_low
- 1
- findings_medium
- 0
- penalty
- 27.90
- workflows
- 1
Security postureok
- check:dependency_updates
- no
- check:lockfiles
- yes
- check:security_policy
- no
- check:signed_commits
- yes
- signed_commit_share
- 100.0%
- unpinned_manifests
- 0
Release downloadsok6 items
- release v0.18.1 ships ledger-v0.18.1-linux-amd64.tar.gz (1 downloads)
- release v0.18.0 ships ledger-v0.18.0-linux-amd64.tar.gz (1 downloads)
- release v0.17.1 ships ledger-v0.17.1-linux-amd64.tar.gz (1 downloads)
- release v0.17.1-debian13.1 ships ledger-v0.17.1-debian13.1-linux-amd64.tar.gz (1 downloads)
- release v0.17.0 ships ledger-v0.17.0-linux-amd64.tar.gz (1 downloads)
- gives an archive password
README.md
- binary_assets
- 10
- signals
- 2
- suspicious
- 0
Findings
7 high28 medium16 low
51 findings
| Severity | Rule | Location | Message | Tool |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| high | opengrep/typescript.lang.correctness.useless-ternary |
backend/src/gmail.ts:437 | It looks like no matter how typeof a.content === "string" is evaluated, this expression returns Buffer.from(a.content).toString("base64"). This is probably a copy-paste error. | Lint |
| high | zizmor/unpinned-uses |
.github/workflows/release.yml:56 | unpinned action reference [confidence high] | CI workflows (zizmor) |
| high | zizmor/cache-poisoning |
.github/workflows/release.yml:65 | runtime artifacts potentially vulnerable to a cache poisoning attack [confidence low] | CI workflows (zizmor) |
| high | zizmor/unpinned-uses |
.github/workflows/release.yml:65 | unpinned action reference [confidence high] | CI workflows (zizmor) |
| high | opengrep/javascript.express.security.injection.tainted-sql-string |
backend/src/ledger.ts:330 | Detected user input used to manually construct a SQL string. This is usually bad practice because manual construction could accidentally result in a SQL injection. An attacker could use a SQL injection to steal or modify contents of the... | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| high | opengrep/javascript.express.security.injection.tainted-sql-string |
backend/src/ledger.ts:392 | Detected user input used to manually construct a SQL string. This is usually bad practice because manual construction could accidentally result in a SQL injection. An attacker could use a SQL injection to steal or modify contents of the... | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| high | osv/GHSA-587h-7wmj-h5pm |
frontend/package-lock.json | [email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-587h-7wmj-h5pm | Dependencies (osv-scanner) |
| medium | opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.no-replaceall |
.claude/skills/ledger-module/scripts/check-module.ts:174 | The string method replaceAll is not supported in all versions of javascript, and is not supported by older browser versions. Consider using replace() with a regex as the first argument instead like mystring.replace(/bad/g, "good")... | Lint |
| medium | opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.no-replaceall |
backend/src/backup.ts:372 | The string method replaceAll is not supported in all versions of javascript, and is not supported by older browser versions. Consider using replace() with a regex as the first argument instead like mystring.replace(/bad/g, "good")... | Lint |
| medium | opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.no-replaceall |
backend/src/backup.ts:394 | The string method replaceAll is not supported in all versions of javascript, and is not supported by older browser versions. Consider using replace() with a regex as the first argument instead like mystring.replace(/bad/g, "good")... | Lint |
| medium | opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.no-replaceall |
backend/src/backup.ts:642 | The string method replaceAll is not supported in all versions of javascript, and is not supported by older browser versions. Consider using replace() with a regex as the first argument instead like mystring.replace(/bad/g, "good")... | Lint |
| medium | opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.no-replaceall |
backend/src/backup.ts:959 | The string method replaceAll is not supported in all versions of javascript, and is not supported by older browser versions. Consider using replace() with a regex as the first argument instead like mystring.replace(/bad/g, "good")... | Lint |
| medium | opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.no-replaceall |
backend/src/backup.ts:986 | The string method replaceAll is not supported in all versions of javascript, and is not supported by older browser versions. Consider using replace() with a regex as the first argument instead like mystring.replace(/bad/g, "good")... | Lint |
| medium | opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.no-replaceall |
backend/src/csv.ts:22 | The string method replaceAll is not supported in all versions of javascript, and is not supported by older browser versions. Consider using replace() with a regex as the first argument instead like mystring.replace(/bad/g, "good")... | Lint |
| medium | opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.no-replaceall |
backend/src/migrate.ts:699 | The string method replaceAll is not supported in all versions of javascript, and is not supported by older browser versions. Consider using replace() with a regex as the first argument instead like mystring.replace(/bad/g, "good")... | Lint |
| medium | opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.no-replaceall |
backend/src/module-host.ts:145 | The string method replaceAll is not supported in all versions of javascript, and is not supported by older browser versions. Consider using replace() with a regex as the first argument instead like mystring.replace(/bad/g, "good")... | Lint |
| medium | opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.no-replaceall |
backend/src/module-import.ts:131 | The string method replaceAll is not supported in all versions of javascript, and is not supported by older browser versions. Consider using replace() with a regex as the first argument instead like mystring.replace(/bad/g, "good")... | Lint |
| medium | opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.no-replaceall |
backend/src/module-installer.ts:257 | The string method replaceAll is not supported in all versions of javascript, and is not supported by older browser versions. Consider using replace() with a regex as the first argument instead like mystring.replace(/bad/g, "good")... | Lint |
| medium | opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.no-replaceall |
backend/src/module-installer.ts:258 | The string method replaceAll is not supported in all versions of javascript, and is not supported by older browser versions. Consider using replace() with a regex as the first argument instead like mystring.replace(/bad/g, "good")... | Lint |
| medium | opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.no-replaceall |
backend/src/module-installer.ts:56 | The string method replaceAll is not supported in all versions of javascript, and is not supported by older browser versions. Consider using replace() with a regex as the first argument instead like mystring.replace(/bad/g, "good")... | Lint |
| medium | opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.no-replaceall |
backend/src/restore.ts:254 | The string method replaceAll is not supported in all versions of javascript, and is not supported by older browser versions. Consider using replace() with a regex as the first argument instead like mystring.replace(/bad/g, "good")... | Lint |
| medium | opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.no-replaceall |
backend/src/restore.ts:255 | The string method replaceAll is not supported in all versions of javascript, and is not supported by older browser versions. Consider using replace() with a regex as the first argument instead like mystring.replace(/bad/g, "good")... | Lint |
| medium | opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.no-replaceall |
backend/src/search.ts:34 | The string method replaceAll is not supported in all versions of javascript, and is not supported by older browser versions. Consider using replace() with a regex as the first argument instead like mystring.replace(/bad/g, "good")... | Lint |
| medium | opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.no-replaceall |
backend/src/updater.ts:454 | The string method replaceAll is not supported in all versions of javascript, and is not supported by older browser versions. Consider using replace() with a regex as the first argument instead like mystring.replace(/bad/g, "good")... | Lint |
| medium | opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.no-replaceall |
frontend/src/lib/money.ts:20 | The string method replaceAll is not supported in all versions of javascript, and is not supported by older browser versions. Consider using replace() with a regex as the first argument instead like mystring.replace(/bad/g, "good")... | Lint |
| medium | opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.no-replaceall |
frontend/src/lib/money.ts:39 | The string method replaceAll is not supported in all versions of javascript, and is not supported by older browser versions. Consider using replace() with a regex as the first argument instead like mystring.replace(/bad/g, "good")... | Lint |
| medium | opengrep/javascript.lang.security.audit.detect-non-literal-regexp |
backend/src/migrate.ts:276 | RegExp() called with a `words` function argument, this might allow an attacker to cause a Regular Expression Denial-of-Service (ReDoS) within your application as RegExP blocks the main thread. For this reason, it is recommended to use... | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| medium | opengrep/bash.lang.security.ifs-tampering |
deploy/lxc-template/build-lxc-template.sh:143 | The special variable IFS affects how splitting takes place when expanding unquoted variables. Don't set it globally. Prefer a dedicated utility such as 'cut' or 'awk' if you need to split input data. If you must use 'read', set IFS... | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| medium | osv/GHSA-698v-4r3x-3vcv |
frontend/package-lock.json | [email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-698v-4r3x-3vcv | Dependencies (osv-scanner) |
| medium | osv/GHSA-gcqx-w48m-w2h4 |
frontend/package-lock.json | [email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-gcqx-w48m-w2h4 | Dependencies (osv-scanner) |
| medium | osv/GHSA-jf9x-2fg2-hx4w |
frontend/package-lock.json | @sveltejs/[email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-jf9x-2fg2-hx4w | Dependencies (osv-scanner) |
| medium | osv/GHSA-mw6w-2fmv-pvw3 |
frontend/package-lock.json | @sveltejs/[email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-mw6w-2fmv-pvw3 | Dependencies (osv-scanner) |
| medium | osv/GHSA-r825-w8mm-5pxw |
frontend/package-lock.json | [email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-r825-w8mm-5pxw | Dependencies (osv-scanner) |
| medium | osv/GHSA-rq7h-c2jc-7f22 |
frontend/package-lock.json | [email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-rq7h-c2jc-7f22 | Dependencies (osv-scanner) |
| medium | osv/GHSA-vfpm-58rq-9qcg |
frontend/package-lock.json | [email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-vfpm-58rq-9qcg | Dependencies (osv-scanner) |
| low | opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.missing-template-string-indicator |
.claude/skills/ledger-module/scripts/check-module.ts:231 | This looks like a JavaScript template string. Are you missing a '$' in front of '{...}'? | Lint |
| low | opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.missing-template-string-indicator |
.claude/skills/ledger-module/scripts/check-module.ts:231 | This looks like a JavaScript template string. Are you missing a '$' in front of '{...}'? | Lint |
| low | opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.missing-template-string-indicator |
.claude/skills/ledger-module/scripts/check-module.ts:232 | This looks like a JavaScript template string. Are you missing a '$' in front of '{...}'? | Lint |
| low | opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.missing-template-string-indicator |
.claude/skills/ledger-module/scripts/check-module.ts:232 | This looks like a JavaScript template string. Are you missing a '$' in front of '{...}'? | Lint |
| low | opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.useless-assignment |
backend/src/module-import.ts:133 | `hit` is assigned twice; the first assignment is useless | Lint |
| low | opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.missing-template-string-indicator |
backend/src/module-settings.ts:88 | This looks like a JavaScript template string. Are you missing a '$' in front of '{...}'? | Lint |
| low | opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.missing-template-string-indicator |
backend/src/module-settings.ts:88 | This looks like a JavaScript template string. Are you missing a '$' in front of '{...}'? | Lint |
| low | opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.missing-template-string-indicator |
backend/src/search.ts:40 | This looks like a JavaScript template string. Are you missing a '$' in front of '{...}'? | Lint |
| low | opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.missing-template-string-indicator |
backend/src/search.ts:40 | This looks like a JavaScript template string. Are you missing a '$' in front of '{...}'? | Lint |
| low | opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.missing-template-string-indicator |
backend/src/search.ts:40 | This looks like a JavaScript template string. Are you missing a '$' in front of '{...}'? | Lint |
| low | opengrep/bash.lang.correctness.unquoted-variable-expansion-in-command |
deploy/create-org-db.sh:30 | Variable expansions must be double-quoted so as to prevent being split into multiple pieces according to whitespace or whichever separator is specified by the IFS variable. If you really wish to split the variable's contents, you may... | Lint |
| low | opengrep/bash.lang.correctness.unquoted-command-substitution-in-command |
deploy/install.sh:140 | The result of command substitution $(...) or `...`, if unquoted, is split on whitespace or other separators specified by the IFS variable. You should surround it with double quotes to avoid splitting the result. | Lint |
| low | opengrep/bash.lang.correctness.unquoted-command-substitution-in-command |
deploy/install.sh:140 | The result of command substitution $(...) or `...`, if unquoted, is split on whitespace or other separators specified by the IFS variable. You should surround it with double quotes to avoid splitting the result. | Lint |
| low | opengrep/bash.lang.correctness.unquoted-variable-expansion-in-command |
deploy/setup-db.sh:49 | Variable expansions must be double-quoted so as to prevent being split into multiple pieces according to whitespace or whichever separator is specified by the IFS variable. If you really wish to split the variable's contents, you may... | Lint |
| low | zizmor/artipacked |
.github/workflows/release.yml:56 | credential persistence through GitHub Actions artifacts [confidence low] | CI workflows (zizmor) |
| low | osv/GHSA-9jrq-w75r-8gcw |
frontend/package-lock.json | [email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-9jrq-w75r-8gcw | Dependencies (osv-scanner) |
Tools and coverage
Every analyzer that ran on this commit. A failed or skipped tool is a coverage gap: its share of the score is left out and the coverage figure drops.
| Analyzer | Pillar | Status | Version | Findings | Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI tool configuration | AI provenance | ok | signatures-v1 | 0 | |
| Explicit AI attribution | AI provenance | ok | signatures-v1 | 0 | |
| Release velocity | AI provenance | ok | prov-4 | 0 | |
| Coding style | AI provenance | ok | — | 0 | |
| Commit velocity | AI provenance | ok | prov-4 | 0 | |
| Findings in AI-written lines | AI provenance | ok | git-blame | 0 | |
| Complexity (lizard) | Code quality | ok | lizard 1.25.1 | 0 | |
| Documentation | Code quality | ok | — | 0 | |
| Duplication (jscpd) | Code quality | ok | repotrust-dup-w6 | 0 | |
| Lint | Code quality | ok | opengrep 1.33.1; rules f1d2b562b414 | 34 | |
| Tests and CI | Code quality | ok | — | 0 | |
| Type safety | Code quality | ok | — | 0 | |
| CI workflows (zizmor) | Security | ok | zizmor 1.32.0 | 4 | |
| Dependencies (osv-scanner) | Security | ok | osv-scanner version: 2.7.1 | 9 | |
| Release downloads | Security | ok | — | 0 | |
| Security posture | Security | ok | — | 0 | |
| Package registries | Security | ok | — | 0 | |
| Static analysis (opengrep) | Security | ok | opengrep 1.33.1; rules f1d2b562b414 | 4 | |
| OpenSSF Scorecard | Security | skipped | — | 0 | no published OpenSSF Scorecard result for this repo |
| Secrets (gitleaks) | Security | ok | gitleaks 8.30.1 | 0 |
Score history
Scores from different scoring versions aren't directly comparable.
| Scored | Commit | Scoring | AI provenance | Quality | Security |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-11-14 | 870cdaee1fe6 | prov-5+qual-2+sec-2 | 100% | 65 | 78 |
| 2026-11-14 | 870cdaee1fe6 | prov-4+qual-2+sec-2 | 100% | 65 | 78 |
Full text report
- Repository: https://github.com/mastifdogo/Bookeeping
- Commit:
870cdaee1fe616d3f567bd79f2f4f3e7a6634681 - Generated: 2026-11-14T14:52:06+00:00
- Scorer 0.1.0, scoring prov-5+qual-2+sec-2, report schema v2
Scores
| Pillar | Score | Signal | Confidence | Coverage |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI provenance (estimated AI-generated share) | 100 | explicit | 90% | 100% |
| Code quality | 65 | weak | 90% | 100% |
| Security | 78 | adequate | 85% | 100% |
AI provenance
Explicit AI attribution on 100% of first-party code added; an estimated 100% including velocity signals.
- Explicitly attributed share (lower bound): 100.0%
- Unattributed share in AI-consistent velocity bursts: 0.0%
- Estimated AI-generated share: 100.0%
| AI tool | Attributed commits | Lines added |
|---|---|---|
| Claude Code | 78 | 41,923 |
- AI tooling configured in repo: claude-code
Current source lines last changed by AI-attributed commits: 30,060 of 30,060.
Too few lines in one group to compare finding densities.
- Stylometry index: 0.03 per 1,000 lines (narrated steps 1, placeholders 0, assistant phrasing 0, emoji 0). Reported as a signal, not scored.
| Month | Lines added | Attributed to AI |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-10 | 24,479 | 100% |
| 2026-11 | 17,444 | 100% |
Evidence
- Claude Code: author email [email protected] (870cdaee1fe6)
- Claude Code: author email [email protected] (ad8da30d2bbf)
- Claude Code: author email [email protected] (c61fd4ad7d99)
- Claude Code: author email [email protected] (534cfca8d1cb)
- Claude Code: author email [email protected] (f4760b694f3e)
- Claude Code: author email [email protected] (b9c025f7cb1e)
- Claude Code: author email [email protected] (4403b8e219c1)
- Claude Code: author email [email protected] (f6d44ffcf496)
- Claude Code: author email [email protected] (b6ebc93217a0)
- Claude Code: author email [email protected] (9e166334f1a9)
- Claude Code: author email [email protected] (6fb55af203d4)
- Claude Code: author email [email protected] (1f971347210e)
- Claude Code: author email [email protected] (eb7c3f28eb87)
- Claude Code: author email [email protected] (50186e3ad838)
- Claude Code: author email [email protected] (44bb5587a27a)
AI provenance describes how code was produced; it is not a quality judgment. Unless attribution is explicit, these are signals consistent with AI generation, not proof. Squash/rebase workflows, imported code, and rewritten history reduce accuracy.
Code quality
Code quality is weak: test-to-source ratio 0.15, CI runs tests; 22% of function code in complex or long functions; 9% duplicated lines. Weakest area: docs.
| Area | Score |
|---|---|
| Complexity (lizard) | 52 |
| Duplication | 58 |
| Code smells (Opengrep) | 80 |
| Tests and CI | 73 |
| Documentation | 40 |
| Type safety | 100 |
| Process (Scorecard review/maintenance) | n/a |
- Functions: 1,457; mean complexity 3.4, 90th percentile 7; 47 complex and 5 long functions
- Duplicated lines: 9.2% of 23,571 compared
- Tests: 4,631 test lines for 30,060 source lines (ratio 0.15); CI test commands: make test; 74% of recent source commits also change tests
- Docs missing or thin: license, contributing, changelog
Most complex functions:
- buildPlan in backend/src/migrate.ts: complexity 112, 179 lines
- callProvider in backend/src/llm.ts: complexity 61, 100 lines
- parseSettingsSpec in backend/src/module-settings.ts: complexity 59, 58 lines
- cleanMapping in backend/src/migrate.ts: complexity 52, 72 lines
- runBackup in backend/src/backup.ts: complexity 44, 120 lines
Security
Security posture is adequate: 9 known vulnerabilities in 4 dependencies; 2 high-severity SAST findings; 3 high-severity workflow issues. Weakest area: posture.
| Area | Score |
|---|---|
| Secrets (gitleaks, tree + history) | 100 |
| Static analysis (Opengrep) | 95 |
| Vulnerable dependencies (OSV) | 75 |
| CI workflows (zizmor) | 63 |
| Posture (policy, updates, signing, lockfiles) | 20 |
| OpenSSF Scorecard | n/a |
-
Known vulnerabilities: 9 in 4 packages (critical 0, high 1, medium 7, low 1)
-
Posture checks passed: signed commits, lockfiles; missing: security policy, dependency updates
Top findings
| Severity | Finding | Location |
|---|---|---|
| high | opengrep/javascript.express.security.injection.tainted-sql-string: Detected user input used to manually construct a SQL string. This is usually bad practice because manual construction could accidentally result in a SQL injection. An attacker could use a SQL injection to steal or modify contents of the database. Instead, use a parameterized query which is available [confidence medium] |
backend/src/ledger.ts:330 |
| high | opengrep/javascript.express.security.injection.tainted-sql-string: Detected user input used to manually construct a SQL string. This is usually bad practice because manual construction could accidentally result in a SQL injection. An attacker could use a SQL injection to steal or modify contents of the database. Instead, use a parameterized query which is available [confidence medium] |
backend/src/ledger.ts:392 |
| high | osv/GHSA-587h-7wmj-h5pm: [email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-587h-7wmj-h5pm |
frontend/package-lock.json |
| high | zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] |
.github/workflows/release.yml:56 |
| high | zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] |
.github/workflows/release.yml:65 |
| high | zizmor/cache-poisoning: runtime artifacts potentially vulnerable to a cache poisoning attack [confidence low] |
.github/workflows/release.yml:65 |
| medium | opengrep/javascript.lang.security.audit.detect-non-literal-regexp: RegExp() called with a words function argument, this might allow an attacker to cause a Regular Expression Denial-of-Service (ReDoS) within your application as RegExP blocks the main thread. For this reason, it is recommended to use hardcoded regexes instead. If your regex is run on user-controlle [confidence low] |
backend/src/migrate.ts:276 |
| medium | opengrep/bash.lang.security.ifs-tampering: The special variable IFS affects how splitting takes place when expanding unquoted variables. Don't set it globally. Prefer a dedicated utility such as 'cut' or 'awk' if you need to split input data. If you must use 'read', set IFS locally using e.g. 'IFS="," read -a my_array'. [confidence low] |
deploy/lxc-template/build-lxc-template.sh:143 |
| medium | osv/GHSA-jf9x-2fg2-hx4w: @sveltejs/[email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-jf9x-2fg2-hx4w |
frontend/package-lock.json |
| medium | osv/GHSA-mw6w-2fmv-pvw3: @sveltejs/[email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-mw6w-2fmv-pvw3 |
frontend/package-lock.json |
| medium | osv/GHSA-gcqx-w48m-w2h4: [email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-gcqx-w48m-w2h4 |
frontend/package-lock.json |
| medium | osv/GHSA-698v-4r3x-3vcv: [email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-698v-4r3x-3vcv |
frontend/package-lock.json |
| medium | osv/GHSA-r825-w8mm-5pxw: [email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-r825-w8mm-5pxw |
frontend/package-lock.json |
| medium | osv/GHSA-rq7h-c2jc-7f22: [email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-rq7h-c2jc-7f22 |
frontend/package-lock.json |
| medium | osv/GHSA-vfpm-58rq-9qcg: [email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-vfpm-58rq-9qcg |
frontend/package-lock.json |
| low | osv/GHSA-9jrq-w75r-8gcw: [email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-9jrq-w75r-8gcw |
frontend/package-lock.json |
| low | zizmor/artipacked: credential persistence through GitHub Actions artifacts [confidence low] |
.github/workflows/release.yml:56 |
Static signals only: the scorer never runs the project's code. Secret findings are pattern matches that were not verified, and secret values are never stored.
Distribution signals
- binary-release-asset: release v0.18.1 ships ledger-v0.18.1-linux-amd64.tar.gz (1 downloads)
- binary-release-asset: release v0.18.0 ships ledger-v0.18.0-linux-amd64.tar.gz (1 downloads)
- binary-release-asset: release v0.17.1 ships ledger-v0.17.1-linux-amd64.tar.gz (1 downloads)
- binary-release-asset: release v0.17.1-debian13.1 ships ledger-v0.17.1-debian13.1-linux-amd64.tar.gz (1 downloads)
- binary-release-asset: release v0.17.0 ships ledger-v0.17.0-linux-amd64.tar.gz (1 downloads)
- readme-download-lure: gives an archive password
Signals consistent with a repository that exists to distribute a download. They are heuristics, not a verdict; release files were not downloaded or inspected.
Repository profile
- Source lines: 30,060; test lines: 4,631
| Language | Lines |
|---|---|
| TypeScript | 24,992 |
| Svelte | 7,340 |
| Shell | 1,477 |
| SQL | 778 |
| JavaScript | 104 |