RepoTrust

Leaderboard github.com

maragudk/hallucinationsearch

Hallucinated search results and websites.

  • View repository ↗
  • Go
  • ★ 1
  • commit 11be94fa1682
  • scored 2026-11-14
  • scoring prov-5+qual-2+sec-2

AI provenance

0%

possible

Confidence
51%
Coverage
100%

Estimated share of AI-generated code. Explicit attribution is a lower bound.

Code quality

83/100

strong

Confidence
90%
Coverage
100%

Complexity, duplication, lint density, tests, CI, docs and review process.

Security

59/100

weak

Confidence
85%
Coverage
100%

Secrets, static analysis, vulnerable dependencies, CI and supply-chain posture.

AI provenance

0% possible

Weak signals consistent with AI-assisted development. 1 commit(s) carry explicit AI attribution, too few to characterize the codebase.

How the score is built

  • Explicitly attributed share0%
  • Unattributed share in AI-pace bursts0%
  • Estimated AI-generated share0%
  • AI tool configuration files2
  • Work sessions at AI pace0
  • Releases at AI pacenot measured
  • Coding-style index (1.0+ means possible)0.16

Attributed AI tools

ToolCommitsLines addedFirst seenLast seen
GitHub Copilot coding agent102025-09-182025-09-18
Claude Code102025-09-182025-09-18

Lines added per month all AI-attributed share

  1. 2025-09771 · 0% AI
  2. 2025-104 · 0% AI
  3. 2025-1179 · 0% AI
  4. 2026-0214 · 0% AI
  5. 2026-0397 · 0% AI
  6. 2026-043,747 · 0% AI

Findings in AI-attributed lines vs the rest

From git blame: 0 lines trace to AI-attributed commits, 3,195 to others. Too few lines in one group for a fair comparison. Reported, not scored.

Findings per 1,000 linesAI-attributedOtherRatio
Code quality—2.19—
Security—4.70—

Evidence by analyzer

Explicit AI attributionok3 items
attributed_commit_share
2.3%
attributed_commits
1
attributed_loc
0
attributed_loc_share
0.0%
commits
44
effective_loc
4,712
tools_detected
2
AI tool configurationok2 items
artifacts
2
earliest_adoption
2025-09-18
tools_configured
2
workflow_agents
0
Commit velocityok
excluded_import_loc
0
flagged_loc
0
flagged_loc_share
0.0%
flagged_units
0
max_loc_per_hour
715.12
measured_loc
4,712
median_loc_per_hour
472.66
pr_timed_units
8
pre_ai_era_burst_loc
0
pre_ai_era_bursts
0
pre_ai_era_measured_loc
0
work_units
18
Release velocityskipped
Coding styleok
count:assistant_voice
0
count:emoji_in_code
1
count:narrated_steps
0
count:placeholder
0
files:assistant_voice
0
files:emoji_in_code
1
files:narrated_steps
0
files:placeholder
0
index
0.16
lines_scanned
3,195
per_kloc:assistant_voice
0
per_kloc:emoji_in_code
0.31
per_kloc:narrated_steps
0
per_kloc:placeholder
0
Findings in AI-written linesok
ai_lines
0
blame_failures
0
files_blamed
35
other_lines
3,195
quality:ai_findings
0
quality:other_findings
7
quality:other_per_kloc
2.19
security:ai_findings
0
security:other_findings
15
security:other_per_kloc
4.70

Code quality

83 strong

Code quality is strong: test-to-source ratio 0.26, CI runs tests; 1% of function code in complex or long functions; 4% duplicated lines. Weakest area: docs.

How the score is built

  • Complexity96
  • Duplication80
  • Lint and smells72
  • Tests and CI88
  • Documentation65
  • Type safetynot measured
  • Review processnot measured

Evidence by analyzer

Complexity (lizard)ok10 items
complex_functions
14
function_nloc
1,886
functions
315
long_functions
0
many_param_functions
0
mean_ccn
3.80
p90_ccn
9
risky_nloc_share
1.4%
Duplication (jscpd)ok5 items
compared_lines
2,248
duplicated_lines
84
duplicated_share
3.7%
files
35
Lintok
category:correctness
7
findings
7
scanned_lines
3,095
weighted_findings
4
Tests and CIok6 items
  • CI config: .github/workflows/cd.yml .github/workflows/cd.yml
  • CI config: .github/workflows/ci.yml .github/workflows/ci.yml
  • CI config: .github/workflows/compatibility.yml .github/workflows/compatibility.yml
  • CI config: .github/workflows/security.yml .github/workflows/security.yml
  • CI runs tests (go test)
  • CI runs linters (golangci-lint)
check:ci_present
yes
check:ci_runs_lint
yes
check:ci_runs_tests
yes
check:has_tests
yes
check:test_ratio
no
check:tests_cochange
yes
ci_files
4
cochange_commits
21
cochange_share
33.3%
source_lines
3,195
test_lines
846
test_ratio
0.26
Documentationok2 items
  • README.md README.md
  • LICENSE LICENSE
check:changelog
no
check:contributing
no
check:license
yes
check:readme
yes
readme_lines
20
Type safetyskipped

Security

59 weak

Security posture is weak: 53 known vulnerabilities in 13 dependencies; 1 high-severity SAST findings; 22 high-severity workflow issues. Weakest area: ci actions.

How the score is built

  • Secrets100
  • Static analysis (SAST)51
  • Vulnerable dependencies37
  • CI workflows1
  • Security posture100
  • OpenSSF Scorecardnot measured

Evidence by analyzer

OpenSSF Scorecardskipped

no published OpenSSF Scorecard result for this repo

Package registriesskipped

no registry dependencies declared

Secrets (gitleaks)ok
secrets_current
0
secrets_history
0
secrets_low_confidence
0
secrets_nonprod
0
Static analysis (opengrep)ok
findings
16
findings_high
1
findings_low
0
findings_medium
15
parse_errors
0
scanned_lines
3,095
weighted_findings
5.90
Dependencies (osv-scanner)ok
penalty
59
vulnerabilities
53
vulnerable_packages
13
vulns_critical
8
vulns_high
5
vulns_low
4
vulns_medium
12
vulns_unknown
24
CI workflows (zizmor)ok
findings
29
findings_high
22
findings_low
1
findings_medium
6
penalty
280.30
workflows
4
Security postureok2 items
  • Security policy: https://github.com/maragudk/hallucinationsearch/security/policy https://github.com/maragudk/hallucinationsearch/security/policy
  • Dependency updates: .github/dependabot.yml .github/dependabot.yml
check:dependency_updates
yes
check:lockfiles
yes
check:security_policy
yes
check:signed_commits
yes
signed_commit_share
90.9%
unpinned_manifests
0
Release downloadsok
binary_assets
0
signals
0
suspicious
0

Findings

8 critical28 high60 medium9 low

SeverityRuleLocationMessageTool
critical osv/GHSA-5cgq-3rg8-m6cv go.mod golang.org/x/[email protected] (Go) is affected by GO-2026-5021, GHSA-5cgq-3rg8-m6cv Dependencies (osv-scanner)
critical osv/GHSA-89gr-r52h-f8rx go.mod golang.org/x/[email protected] (Go) is affected by GO-2026-5019, GHSA-89gr-r52h-f8rx Dependencies (osv-scanner)
critical osv/GHSA-f5wc-c3c7-36mc go.mod golang.org/x/[email protected] (Go) is affected by GO-2026-5006, GHSA-f5wc-c3c7-36mc Dependencies (osv-scanner)
critical osv/GHSA-jppx-rxg9-jmrx go.mod golang.org/x/[email protected] (Go) is affected by GO-2026-5005, GHSA-jppx-rxg9-jmrx Dependencies (osv-scanner)
critical osv/GHSA-p77j-4mvh-x3m3 go.mod google.golang.org/[email protected] (Go) is affected by GO-2026-4762, GHSA-p77j-4mvh-x3m3 Dependencies (osv-scanner)
critical osv/GHSA-rm3j-f69w-wqmq go.mod golang.org/x/[email protected] (Go) is affected by GO-2026-5020, GHSA-rm3j-f69w-wqmq Dependencies (osv-scanner)
critical osv/GHSA-vgwf-h737-ff37 go.mod golang.org/x/[email protected] (Go) is affected by GO-2026-5017, GHSA-vgwf-h737-ff37 Dependencies (osv-scanner)
critical osv/GHSA-x527-x647-q7gg go.mod golang.org/x/[email protected] (Go) is affected by GO-2026-5023, GHSA-x527-x647-q7gg Dependencies (osv-scanner)
high zizmor/unpinned-uses .github/workflows/cd.yml:18 unpinned action reference [confidence high] CI workflows (zizmor)
high zizmor/unpinned-uses .github/workflows/cd.yml:21 unpinned action reference [confidence high] CI workflows (zizmor)
high zizmor/unpinned-uses .github/workflows/cd.yml:24 unpinned action reference [confidence high] CI workflows (zizmor)
high zizmor/unpinned-uses .github/workflows/cd.yml:27 unpinned action reference [confidence high] CI workflows (zizmor)
high zizmor/unpinned-uses .github/workflows/cd.yml:34 unpinned action reference [confidence high] CI workflows (zizmor)
high zizmor/unpinned-uses .github/workflows/ci.yml:105 unpinned action reference [confidence high] CI workflows (zizmor)
high zizmor/unpinned-uses .github/workflows/ci.yml:21 unpinned action reference [confidence high] CI workflows (zizmor)
high zizmor/unpinned-uses .github/workflows/ci.yml:26 unpinned action reference [confidence high] CI workflows (zizmor)
high zizmor/unpinned-uses .github/workflows/ci.yml:29 unpinned action reference [confidence high] CI workflows (zizmor)
high zizmor/unpinned-uses .github/workflows/ci.yml:40 unpinned action reference [confidence high] CI workflows (zizmor)
high zizmor/unpinned-uses .github/workflows/ci.yml:45 unpinned action reference [confidence high] CI workflows (zizmor)
high zizmor/unpinned-uses .github/workflows/ci.yml:48 unpinned action reference [confidence high] CI workflows (zizmor)
high zizmor/unpinned-images .github/workflows/ci.yml:60 unpinned image references [confidence high] CI workflows (zizmor)
high zizmor/unpinned-uses .github/workflows/ci.yml:71 unpinned action reference [confidence high] CI workflows (zizmor)
high zizmor/unpinned-uses .github/workflows/ci.yml:76 unpinned action reference [confidence high] CI workflows (zizmor)
high zizmor/unpinned-uses .github/workflows/ci.yml:94 unpinned action reference [confidence high] CI workflows (zizmor)
high zizmor/unpinned-uses .github/workflows/ci.yml:99 unpinned action reference [confidence high] CI workflows (zizmor)
high zizmor/unpinned-images .github/workflows/compatibility.yml:27 unpinned image references [confidence high] CI workflows (zizmor)
high zizmor/unpinned-uses .github/workflows/compatibility.yml:37 unpinned action reference [confidence high] CI workflows (zizmor)
high zizmor/unpinned-uses .github/workflows/compatibility.yml:41 unpinned action reference [confidence high] CI workflows (zizmor)
high zizmor/unpinned-uses .github/workflows/security.yml:22 unpinned action reference [confidence high] CI workflows (zizmor)
high zizmor/unpinned-uses .github/workflows/security.yml:26 unpinned action reference [confidence high] CI workflows (zizmor)
high opengrep/dockerfile.security.missing-user Dockerfile:48 By not specifying a USER, a program in the container may run as 'root'. This is a security hazard. If an attacker can control a process running as root, they may have control over the container. Ensure that the last USER in a Dockerfile... Static analysis (opengrep)
high osv/GHSA-2v4p-qf9q-27wj go.mod google.golang.org/[email protected] (Go) is affected by GO-2026-6443, GHSA-2v4p-qf9q-27wj Dependencies (osv-scanner)
high osv/GHSA-hrxh-6v49-42gf go.mod google.golang.org/[email protected] (Go) is affected by GO-2026-6061, GHSA-hrxh-6v49-42gf Dependencies (osv-scanner)
high osv/GHSA-q4h4-gmj2-qvw2 go.mod golang.org/x/[email protected] (Go) is affected by GO-2026-5013, GHSA-q4h4-gmj2-qvw2 Dependencies (osv-scanner)
high osv/GHSA-vp52-pcj8-j9qc go.mod google.golang.org/[email protected] (Go) is affected by GO-2026-6348, GHSA-vp52-pcj8-j9qc Dependencies (osv-scanner)
high osv/GHSA-w879-237q-wc7r go.mod golang.org/x/[email protected] (Go) is affected by GO-2026-5018, GHSA-w879-237q-wc7r Dependencies (osv-scanner)
medium opengrep/go.lang.correctness.permissions.incorrect-default-permission cmd/app/main.go:60 Detected file permissions that are set to more than `0600` (user/owner can read and write). Setting file permissions to higher than `0600` is most likely unnecessary and violates the principle of least privilege. Instead, set... Lint
medium opengrep/go.lang.correctness.permissions.incorrect-default-permission llm/image_store.go:79 Detected file permissions that are set to more than `0600` (user/owner can read and write). Setting file permissions to higher than `0600` is most likely unnecessary and violates the principle of least privilege. Instead, set... Lint
medium opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.no-stringify-keys public/scripts/datastar.js:8 JSON stringify does not produce a stable key ordering, and should not be relied on for producing object keys. Consider using json-stable-stringify instead. Lint
medium zizmor/dependabot-cooldown .github/dependabot.yml:3 insufficient cooldown in Dependabot updates [confidence high] CI workflows (zizmor)
medium zizmor/excessive-permissions .github/workflows/ci.yml:1 overly broad permissions [confidence medium] CI workflows (zizmor)
medium zizmor/excessive-permissions .github/workflows/ci.yml:16 overly broad permissions [confidence medium] CI workflows (zizmor)
medium zizmor/excessive-permissions .github/workflows/ci.yml:35 overly broad permissions [confidence medium] CI workflows (zizmor)
medium zizmor/excessive-permissions .github/workflows/ci.yml:54 overly broad permissions [confidence medium] CI workflows (zizmor)
medium zizmor/excessive-permissions .github/workflows/ci.yml:87 overly broad permissions [confidence medium] CI workflows (zizmor)
medium osv/GHSA-3fxj-6jh8-hvhx go.mod github.com/go-chi/chi/[email protected] (Go) is affected by GO-2026-5774, GHSA-3fxj-6jh8-hvhx Dependencies (osv-scanner)
medium osv/GHSA-45gg-vh54-h5m9 go.mod golang.org/x/[email protected] (Go) is affected by GO-2026-5014, GHSA-45gg-vh54-h5m9 Dependencies (osv-scanner)
medium osv/GHSA-5cv4-jp36-h3mw go.mod golang.org/x/[email protected] (Go) is affected by GO-2026-5028, GHSA-5cv4-jp36-h3mw Dependencies (osv-scanner)
medium osv/GHSA-78mq-xcr3-xm33 go.mod golang.org/x/[email protected] (Go) is affected by GO-2026-5015, GHSA-78mq-xcr3-xm33 Dependencies (osv-scanner)
medium osv/GHSA-9m57-25v3-79x9 go.mod golang.org/x/[email protected] (Go) is affected by GO-2026-5033, GHSA-9m57-25v3-79x9 Dependencies (osv-scanner)
medium osv/GHSA-j6qf-3m9c-vwj3 go.mod github.com/go-chi/chi/[email protected] (Go) is affected by GHSA-j6qf-3m9c-vwj3 Dependencies (osv-scanner)
medium osv/GHSA-q7gw-24fr-5p69 go.mod go.opentelemetry.io/otel/[email protected] (Go) is affected by GHSA-q7gw-24fr-5p69 Dependencies (osv-scanner)
medium osv/GHSA-q7gw-24fr-5p69 go.mod go.opentelemetry.io/otel/[email protected] (Go) is affected by GHSA-q7gw-24fr-5p69 Dependencies (osv-scanner)
medium osv/GHSA-qc2q-p7wx-3px3 go.mod google.golang.org/[email protected] (Go) is affected by GO-2026-6441, GHSA-qc2q-p7wx-3px3 Dependencies (osv-scanner)
medium osv/GHSA-qpw4-5x99-6vjp go.mod golang.org/x/[email protected] (Go) is affected by GO-2026-5016, GHSA-qpw4-5x99-6vjp Dependencies (osv-scanner)
medium osv/GHSA-w8rr-5gcm-pp58 go.mod go.opentelemetry.io/otel/exporters/otlp/otlpmetric/[email protected] (Go) is affected by GO-2026-4985, GHSA-w8rr-5gcm-pp58 Dependencies (osv-scanner)
medium osv/GHSA-w8rr-5gcm-pp58 go.mod go.opentelemetry.io/otel/exporters/otlp/otlptrace/[email protected] (Go) is affected by GO-2026-4985, GHSA-w8rr-5gcm-pp58 Dependencies (osv-scanner)
medium osv/GO-2026-4918 go.mod golang.org/x/[email protected] (Go) is affected by GO-2026-4918 Dependencies (osv-scanner)
medium osv/GO-2026-5024 go.mod golang.org/x/[email protected] (Go) is affected by GO-2026-5024 Dependencies (osv-scanner)
medium osv/GO-2026-5025 go.mod golang.org/x/[email protected] (Go) is affected by GO-2026-5025 Dependencies (osv-scanner)
medium osv/GO-2026-5026 go.mod golang.org/x/[email protected] (Go) is affected by GO-2026-5026 Dependencies (osv-scanner)
medium osv/GO-2026-5027 go.mod golang.org/x/[email protected] (Go) is affected by GO-2026-5027 Dependencies (osv-scanner)
medium osv/GO-2026-5029 go.mod golang.org/x/[email protected] (Go) is affected by GO-2026-5029 Dependencies (osv-scanner)
medium osv/GO-2026-5030 go.mod golang.org/x/[email protected] (Go) is affected by GO-2026-5030 Dependencies (osv-scanner)
medium osv/GO-2026-5158 go.mod go.opentelemetry.io/[email protected] (Go) is affected by GO-2026-5158 Dependencies (osv-scanner)
medium osv/GO-2026-5775 go.mod github.com/go-chi/chi/[email protected] (Go) is affected by GO-2026-5775 Dependencies (osv-scanner)
medium osv/GO-2026-5777 go.mod github.com/go-chi/chi/[email protected] (Go) is affected by GO-2026-5777 Dependencies (osv-scanner)
medium osv/GO-2026-5932 go.mod golang.org/x/[email protected] (Go) is affected by GO-2026-5932 Dependencies (osv-scanner)
medium osv/GO-2026-5942 go.mod golang.org/x/[email protected] (Go) is affected by GO-2026-5942 Dependencies (osv-scanner)
medium osv/GO-2026-5970 go.mod golang.org/x/[email protected] (Go) is affected by GO-2026-5970 Dependencies (osv-scanner)
medium osv/GO-2026-6303 go.mod golang.org/x/[email protected] (Go) is affected by GO-2026-6303 Dependencies (osv-scanner)
medium osv/GO-2026-6354 go.mod golang.org/x/[email protected] (Go) is affected by GO-2026-6354 Dependencies (osv-scanner)
medium osv/GO-2026-6355 go.mod golang.org/x/[email protected] (Go) is affected by GO-2026-6355 Dependencies (osv-scanner)
medium osv/GO-2026-6603 go.mod golang.org/x/[email protected] (Go) is affected by GO-2026-6603 Dependencies (osv-scanner)
medium osv/GO-2026-6610 go.mod golang.org/x/[email protected] (Go) is affected by GO-2026-6610 Dependencies (osv-scanner)
medium osv/GO-2026-6611 go.mod golang.org/x/[email protected] (Go) is affected by GO-2026-6611 Dependencies (osv-scanner)
medium osv/GO-2026-6612 go.mod golang.org/x/[email protected] (Go) is affected by GO-2026-6612 Dependencies (osv-scanner)
medium osv/GO-2026-6617 go.mod golang.org/x/[email protected] (Go) is affected by GO-2026-6617 Dependencies (osv-scanner)
medium osv/GO-2026-6629 go.mod golang.org/x/[email protected] (Go) is affected by GO-2026-6629 Dependencies (osv-scanner)
medium osv/GO-2026-6860 go.mod golang.org/x/[email protected] (Go) is affected by GO-2026-6860 Dependencies (osv-scanner)
medium osv/GO-2026-6866 go.mod golang.org/x/[email protected] (Go) is affected by GO-2026-6866 Dependencies (osv-scanner)
medium opengrep/go.lang.security.audit.xss.no-direct-write-to-responsewriter http/image.go:113 Detected directly writing or similar in 'http.ResponseWriter.write()'. This bypasses HTML escaping that prevents cross-site scripting vulnerabilities. Instead, use the 'html/template' package and render data using 'template.Execute()'.... Static analysis (opengrep)
medium opengrep/go.lang.security.audit.xss.no-fprintf-to-responsewriter http/search.go:348 Detected 'Fprintf' or similar writing to 'http.ResponseWriter'. This bypasses HTML escaping that prevents cross-site scripting vulnerabilities. Instead, use the 'html/template' package to render data to users. [confidence low] Static analysis (opengrep)
medium opengrep/go.lang.security.audit.xss.no-direct-write-to-responsewriter http/search.go:535 Detected directly writing or similar in 'http.ResponseWriter.write()'. This bypasses HTML escaping that prevents cross-site scripting vulnerabilities. Instead, use the 'html/template' package and render data using 'template.Execute()'.... Static analysis (opengrep)
medium opengrep/go.lang.security.audit.crypto.math-random-used llm/constraints.go:5 Do not use `math/rand`. Use `crypto/rand` instead. [confidence medium] Static analysis (opengrep)
medium opengrep/javascript.lang.security.audit.detect-non-literal-regexp public/scripts/datastar.js:2 RegExp() called with a `e` function argument, this might allow an attacker to cause a Regular Expression Denial-of-Service (ReDoS) within your application as RegExP blocks the main thread. For this reason, it is recommended to use... Static analysis (opengrep)
medium opengrep/javascript.lang.security.audit.prototype-pollution.prototype-pollution-loop public/scripts/datastar.js:2 Possibility of prototype polluting function detected. By adding or modifying attributes of an object prototype, it is possible to create attributes that exist on every object, or replace critical attributes with malicious ones. This can... Static analysis (opengrep)
medium opengrep/javascript.lang.security.audit.unsafe-dynamic-method public/scripts/datastar.js:2 Using non-static data to retrieve and run functions from the object is dangerous. If the data is user-controlled, it may allow executing arbitrary code. [confidence low] Static analysis (opengrep)
medium opengrep/javascript.lang.security.audit.unsafe-dynamic-method public/scripts/datastar.js:2 Using non-static data to retrieve and run functions from the object is dangerous. If the data is user-controlled, it may allow executing arbitrary code. [confidence low] Static analysis (opengrep)
medium opengrep/javascript.lang.security.audit.unsafe-dynamic-method public/scripts/datastar.js:2 Using non-static data to retrieve and run functions from the object is dangerous. If the data is user-controlled, it may allow executing arbitrary code. [confidence low] Static analysis (opengrep)
medium opengrep/javascript.lang.security.audit.unsafe-dynamic-method public/scripts/datastar.js:2 Using non-static data to retrieve and run functions from the object is dangerous. If the data is user-controlled, it may allow executing arbitrary code. [confidence low] Static analysis (opengrep)
medium opengrep/javascript.lang.security.audit.unsafe-dynamic-method public/scripts/datastar.js:2 Using non-static data to retrieve and run functions from the object is dangerous. If the data is user-controlled, it may allow executing arbitrary code. [confidence low] Static analysis (opengrep)
medium opengrep/javascript.jquery.security.audit.jquery-insecure-selector public/scripts/datastar.js:5 User controlled data in a `$(...)` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] Static analysis (opengrep)
medium opengrep/javascript.jquery.security.audit.jquery-insecure-selector public/scripts/datastar.js:5 User controlled data in a `$(...)` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] Static analysis (opengrep)
medium opengrep/javascript.lang.security.audit.unsafe-dynamic-method public/scripts/datastar.js:5 Using non-static data to retrieve and run functions from the object is dangerous. If the data is user-controlled, it may allow executing arbitrary code. [confidence low] Static analysis (opengrep)
medium opengrep/javascript.lang.security.html-in-template-string public/scripts/datastar.js:8 This template literal looks like HTML and has interpolated variables. These variables are not HTML-encoded by default. If the variables contain HTML tags, these may be interpreted by the browser, resulting in cross-site scripting (XSS).... Static analysis (opengrep)
low opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.useless-assignment public/scripts/datastar.js:8 `s` is assigned twice; the first assignment is useless Lint
low opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.useless-assignment public/scripts/datastar.js:8 `s` is assigned twice; the first assignment is useless Lint
low opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.useless-assignment public/scripts/datastar.js:8 `a` is assigned twice; the first assignment is useless Lint
low opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.useless-assignment public/scripts/datastar.js:8 `s` is assigned twice; the first assignment is useless Lint
low zizmor/artipacked .github/workflows/cd.yml:18 credential persistence through GitHub Actions artifacts [confidence low] CI workflows (zizmor)
low osv/GHSA-8wmf-6v46-5gfg go.mod go.opentelemetry.io/otel/exporters/otlp/[email protected] (Go) is affected by GO-2026-6505, GHSA-8wmf-6v46-5gfg Dependencies (osv-scanner)
low osv/GHSA-8wmf-6v46-5gfg go.mod go.opentelemetry.io/otel/exporters/otlp/otlptrace/[email protected] (Go) is affected by GO-2026-6505, GHSA-8wmf-6v46-5gfg Dependencies (osv-scanner)
low osv/GHSA-8wmf-6v46-5gfg go.mod go.opentelemetry.io/otel/exporters/otlp/otlptrace/[email protected] (Go) is affected by GO-2026-6505, GHSA-8wmf-6v46-5gfg Dependencies (osv-scanner)
low osv/GHSA-8wmf-6v46-5gfg go.mod go.opentelemetry.io/otel/[email protected] (Go) is affected by GO-2026-6505, GHSA-8wmf-6v46-5gfg Dependencies (osv-scanner)

Tools and coverage

Every analyzer that ran on this commit. A failed or skipped tool is a coverage gap: its share of the score is left out and the coverage figure drops.

AnalyzerPillarStatusVersionFindingsNote
AI tool configurationAI provenanceoksignatures-v10
Explicit AI attributionAI provenanceoksignatures-v10
Release velocityAI provenanceskipped—0
Coding styleAI provenanceok—0
Commit velocityAI provenanceokprov-40
Findings in AI-written linesAI provenanceokgit-blame0
Complexity (lizard)Code qualityoklizard 1.25.10
DocumentationCode qualityok—0
Duplication (jscpd)Code qualityokrepotrust-dup-w60
LintCode qualityokopengrep 1.33.1; rules f1d2b562b4147
Tests and CICode qualityok—0
Type safetyCode qualityskipped—0
CI workflows (zizmor)Securityokzizmor 1.32.029
Dependencies (osv-scanner)Securityokosv-scanner version: 2.7.153
Release downloadsSecurityok—0
Security postureSecurityok—0
Package registriesSecurityskipped—0no registry dependencies declared
Static analysis (opengrep)Securityokopengrep 1.33.1; rules f1d2b562b41416
OpenSSF ScorecardSecurityskipped—0no published OpenSSF Scorecard result for this repo
Secrets (gitleaks)Securityokgitleaks 8.30.10

Score history

Scores from different scoring versions aren't directly comparable.

ScoredCommitScoringAI provenanceQualitySecurity
2026-11-1411be94fa1682prov-5+qual-2+sec-20%8359
2026-11-1411be94fa1682prov-4+qual-2+sec-20%8359

Embed a badge

Maintainers can show these in a README. Badges update when the repository is re-scored.

[![RepoTrust ai](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/badge/github.com/maragudk/hallucinationsearch/ai.svg)](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/r/github.com/maragudk/hallucinationsearch/)
[![RepoTrust quality](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/badge/github.com/maragudk/hallucinationsearch/quality.svg)](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/r/github.com/maragudk/hallucinationsearch/)
[![RepoTrust security](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/badge/github.com/maragudk/hallucinationsearch/security.svg)](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/r/github.com/maragudk/hallucinationsearch/)
Full text report

Scores

Pillar Score Signal Confidence Coverage
AI provenance (estimated AI-generated share) 0 possible 51% 100%
Code quality 83 strong 90% 100%
Security 59 weak 85% 100%

AI provenance

Weak signals consistent with AI-assisted development. 1 commit(s) carry explicit AI attribution, too few to characterize the codebase.

  • Explicitly attributed share (lower bound): 0.0%
  • Unattributed share in AI-consistent velocity bursts: 0.0%
  • Estimated AI-generated share: 0.0%
AI tool Attributed commits Lines added
GitHub Copilot coding agent 1 0
Claude Code 1 0
  • AI tooling configured in repo: claude-code, generic-agent

Current source lines last changed by AI-attributed commits: 0 of 3,195.

Too few lines in one group to compare finding densities.

  • Stylometry index: 0.16 per 1,000 lines (narrated steps 0, placeholders 0, assistant phrasing 0, emoji 1). Reported as a signal, not scored.
Month Lines added Attributed to AI
2025-09 771 0%
2025-10 4 0%
2025-11 79 0%
2026-02 14 0%
2026-03 97 0%
2026-04 3,747 0%

Evidence

  • Claude Code: message 'claude.ai/code' (e100148c8b92)
  • CLAUDE.md (claude-code configuration) (CLAUDE.md)
  • AGENTS.md (generic-agent configuration) (AGENTS.md)

AI provenance describes how code was produced; it is not a quality judgment. Unless attribution is explicit, these are signals consistent with AI generation, not proof. Squash/rebase workflows, imported code, and rewritten history reduce accuracy.

Code quality

Code quality is strong: test-to-source ratio 0.26, CI runs tests; 1% of function code in complex or long functions; 4% duplicated lines. Weakest area: docs.

Area Score
Complexity (lizard) 96
Duplication 80
Code smells (Opengrep) 72
Tests and CI 88
Documentation 65
Type safety n/a
Process (Scorecard review/maintenance) n/a
  • Functions: 315; mean complexity 3.8, 90th percentile 9; 14 complex and 0 long functions
  • Duplicated lines: 3.7% of 2,248 compared
  • Tests: 846 test lines for 3,195 source lines (ratio 0.26); CI test commands: go test; 33% of recent source commits also change tests
  • Docs missing or thin: contributing, changelog

Most complex functions:

Security

Security posture is weak: 53 known vulnerabilities in 13 dependencies; 1 high-severity SAST findings; 22 high-severity workflow issues. Weakest area: ci actions.

Area Score
Secrets (gitleaks, tree + history) 100
Static analysis (Opengrep) 51
Vulnerable dependencies (OSV) 37
CI workflows (zizmor) 1
Posture (policy, updates, signing, lockfiles) 100
OpenSSF Scorecard n/a
  • Known vulnerabilities: 53 in 13 packages (critical 8, high 5, medium 12, low 4)

  • Posture checks passed: security policy, dependency updates, signed commits, lockfiles; missing: none

Top findings

Severity Finding Location
critical osv/GHSA-jppx-rxg9-jmrx: golang.org/x/[email protected] (Go) is affected by GO-2026-5005, GHSA-jppx-rxg9-jmrx go.mod
critical osv/GHSA-f5wc-c3c7-36mc: golang.org/x/[email protected] (Go) is affected by GO-2026-5006, GHSA-f5wc-c3c7-36mc go.mod
critical osv/GHSA-vgwf-h737-ff37: golang.org/x/[email protected] (Go) is affected by GO-2026-5017, GHSA-vgwf-h737-ff37 go.mod
critical osv/GHSA-89gr-r52h-f8rx: golang.org/x/[email protected] (Go) is affected by GO-2026-5019, GHSA-89gr-r52h-f8rx go.mod
critical osv/GHSA-rm3j-f69w-wqmq: golang.org/x/[email protected] (Go) is affected by GO-2026-5020, GHSA-rm3j-f69w-wqmq go.mod
critical osv/GHSA-5cgq-3rg8-m6cv: golang.org/x/[email protected] (Go) is affected by GO-2026-5021, GHSA-5cgq-3rg8-m6cv go.mod
critical osv/GHSA-x527-x647-q7gg: golang.org/x/[email protected] (Go) is affected by GO-2026-5023, GHSA-x527-x647-q7gg go.mod
critical osv/GHSA-p77j-4mvh-x3m3: google.golang.org/[email protected] (Go) is affected by GO-2026-4762, GHSA-p77j-4mvh-x3m3 go.mod
high opengrep/dockerfile.security.missing-user: By not specifying a USER, a program in the container may run as 'root'. This is a security hazard. If an attacker can control a process running as root, they may have control over the container. Ensure that the last USER in a Dockerfile is a USER other than 'root'. [confidence medium] Dockerfile:48
high osv/GHSA-q4h4-gmj2-qvw2: golang.org/x/[email protected] (Go) is affected by GO-2026-5013, GHSA-q4h4-gmj2-qvw2 go.mod
high osv/GHSA-w879-237q-wc7r: golang.org/x/[email protected] (Go) is affected by GO-2026-5018, GHSA-w879-237q-wc7r go.mod
high osv/GHSA-hrxh-6v49-42gf: google.golang.org/[email protected] (Go) is affected by GO-2026-6061, GHSA-hrxh-6v49-42gf go.mod
high osv/GHSA-vp52-pcj8-j9qc: google.golang.org/[email protected] (Go) is affected by GO-2026-6348, GHSA-vp52-pcj8-j9qc go.mod
high osv/GHSA-2v4p-qf9q-27wj: google.golang.org/[email protected] (Go) is affected by GO-2026-6443, GHSA-2v4p-qf9q-27wj go.mod
high zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] .github/workflows/cd.yml:18
high zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] .github/workflows/cd.yml:21
high zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] .github/workflows/cd.yml:24
high zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] .github/workflows/cd.yml:27
high zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] .github/workflows/cd.yml:34
high zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] .github/workflows/ci.yml:21
high zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] .github/workflows/ci.yml:26
high zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] .github/workflows/ci.yml:29
high zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] .github/workflows/ci.yml:40
high zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] .github/workflows/ci.yml:45
high zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] .github/workflows/ci.yml:48

Static signals only: the scorer never runs the project's code. Secret findings are pattern matches that were not verified, and secret values are never stored.

Repository profile

  • Source lines: 3,195; test lines: 846
Language Lines
Go 3,932
SQL 100
JavaScript 9