RepoTrust

Leaderboard github.com

mambucodev/votetracker

A school grade management application built with Python and PySide6 (Qt6).

  • View repository ↗
  • Python
  • ★ 1
  • commit 2097876e77b7
  • scored 2026-11-14
  • scoring prov-5+qual-2+sec-2

AI provenance

34%

explicit

Confidence
95%
Coverage
100%

Estimated share of AI-generated code. Explicit attribution is a lower bound.

Code quality

66/100

adequate

Confidence
90%
Coverage
100%

Complexity, duplication, lint density, tests, CI, docs and review process.

Security

68/100

weak

Confidence
85%
Coverage
100%

Secrets, static analysis, vulnerable dependencies, CI and supply-chain posture.

AI provenance

34% explicit

Explicit AI attribution on 34% of first-party code added; an estimated 34% including velocity signals.

How the score is built

  • Explicitly attributed share34%
  • Unattributed share in AI-pace bursts30%
  • Estimated AI-generated share34%
  • AI tool configuration files3
  • Work sessions at AI pace2
  • Releases at AI pace0
  • Coding-style index (1.0+ means possible)0.44

Attributed AI tools

ToolCommitsLines addedFirst seenLast seen
Claude Code435,7982026-01-162026-01-29
Jules197792026-09-252026-10-03

Lines added per month all AI-attributed share

  1. 2026-0114,444 · 40% AI
  2. 2026-02582 · 0% AI
  3. 2026-04364 · 0% AI
  4. 2026-094,132 · 17% AI
  5. 2026-1064 · 100% AI

Findings in AI-attributed lines vs the rest

From git blame: 4,851 lines trace to AI-attributed commits, 8,915 to others. Reported, not scored.

Findings per 1,000 linesAI-attributedOtherRatio
Code quality0.410.113.68×
Security0.210.111.84×

Evidence by analyzer

Explicit AI attributionok27 items
attributed_commit_share
40.5%
attributed_commits
62
attributed_loc
6,577
attributed_loc_share
33.6%
commits
153
effective_loc
19,586
tools_detected
2
AI tool configurationok3 items
artifacts
3
earliest_adoption
2026-01-27
tools_configured
3
workflow_agents
0
Commit velocityok2 items
excluded_import_loc
3,311
flagged_loc
5,926
flagged_loc_share
36.4%
flagged_units
2
max_loc_per_hour
1,472.99
measured_loc
16,275
median_loc_per_hour
331.59
pr_timed_units
0
pre_ai_era_burst_loc
0
pre_ai_era_bursts
0
pre_ai_era_measured_loc
0
work_units
21
Release velocityok
flagged_releases
0
max_loc_per_day
30,057.40
releases
12
Coding styleok5 items
count:assistant_voice
0
count:emoji_in_code
2
count:narrated_steps
5
count:placeholder
0
files:assistant_voice
0
files:emoji_in_code
1
files:narrated_steps
1
files:placeholder
0
index
0.44
lines_scanned
13,766
per_kloc:assistant_voice
0
per_kloc:emoji_in_code
0.14
per_kloc:narrated_steps
0.36
per_kloc:placeholder
0
Findings in AI-written linesok
ai_lines
4,851
blame_failures
0
files_blamed
49
other_lines
8,915
quality:ai_findings
2
quality:ai_per_kloc
0.41
quality:other_findings
1
quality:other_per_kloc
0.11
quality:ratio
3.68
security:ai_findings
1
security:ai_per_kloc
0.21
security:other_findings
1
security:other_per_kloc
0.11
security:ratio
1.84

Code quality

66 adequate

Code quality is adequate: test-to-source ratio 0.13, CI runs tests; 22% of function code in complex or long functions; 5% duplicated lines. Weakest area: type safety.

How the score is built

  • Complexity52
  • Duplication73
  • Lint and smells95
  • Tests and CI63
  • Documentation65
  • Type safety40
  • Review processnot measured

Evidence by analyzer

Complexity (lizard)ok10 items
complex_functions
14
function_nloc
7,925
functions
446
long_functions
8
many_param_functions
3
mean_ccn
3.52
p90_ccn
8
risky_nloc_share
21.7%
Duplication (jscpd)ok10 items
compared_lines
10,494
duplicated_lines
558
duplicated_share
5.3%
files
49
Lintok
category:best-practice
2
category:maintainability
1
findings
3
scanned_lines
13,766
weighted_findings
3
Tests and CIok3 items
  • CI config: .github/workflows/build.yml .github/workflows/build.yml
  • CI config: .github/workflows/test.yml .github/workflows/test.yml
  • CI runs tests (unittest)
check:ci_present
yes
check:ci_runs_lint
no
check:ci_runs_tests
yes
check:has_tests
yes
check:test_ratio
no
check:tests_cochange
no
ci_files
2
cochange_commits
120
cochange_share
4.2%
source_lines
13,766
test_lines
1,752
test_ratio
0.13
Documentationok2 items
  • README.md README.md
  • LICENSE LICENSE
check:changelog
no
check:contributing
no
check:license
yes
check:readme
yes
readme_lines
148
Type safetyok
check:low_escape_density
yes
check:strict_config
no
escapes
28
escapes_per_kloc
2.53

Security

68 weak

Security posture is weak: 3 known vulnerabilities in 3 dependencies; 1 high-severity SAST findings; 14 high-severity workflow issues. Weakest area: posture.

How the score is built

  • Secrets97
  • Static analysis (SAST)98
  • Vulnerable dependencies86
  • CI workflows4
  • Security posture0
  • OpenSSF Scorecardnot measured

Evidence by analyzer

OpenSSF Scorecardskipped

no published OpenSSF Scorecard result for this repo

Package registriesok
checked
15
declared
15
lookup_errors
0
missing
0
recent
0
Secrets (gitleaks)ok
secrets_current
0
secrets_history
0
secrets_low_confidence
1
secrets_nonprod
0
Static analysis (opengrep)ok
findings
1
findings_high
1
findings_low
0
findings_medium
0
parse_errors
0
scanned_lines
13,766
weighted_findings
0.75
Dependencies (osv-scanner)ok
penalty
9
vulnerabilities
3
vulnerable_packages
3
vulns_critical
0
vulns_high
0
vulns_low
0
vulns_medium
1
vulns_unknown
2
CI workflows (zizmor)ok
findings
25
findings_high
14
findings_low
1
findings_medium
10
penalty
187.20
workflows
2
Security postureok2 items
  • crates/votetracker-core/Cargo.toml has no lockfile alongside it (unpinned dependencies) crates/votetracker-core/Cargo.toml
  • crates/votetracker-gtk/Cargo.toml has no lockfile alongside it (unpinned dependencies) crates/votetracker-gtk/Cargo.toml
check:dependency_updates
no
check:lockfiles
no
check:security_policy
no
check:signed_commits
no
signed_commit_share
22.2%
unpinned_manifests
2
Release downloadsok5 items
binary_assets
10
signals
1
suspicious
0

Findings

15 high16 medium1 low1 info

SeverityRuleLocationMessageTool
high zizmor/unpinned-uses .github/workflows/build.yml:18 unpinned action reference [confidence high] CI workflows (zizmor)
high zizmor/unpinned-uses .github/workflows/build.yml:21 unpinned action reference [confidence high] CI workflows (zizmor)
high zizmor/unpinned-uses .github/workflows/build.yml:35 unpinned action reference [confidence high] CI workflows (zizmor)
high zizmor/unpinned-uses .github/workflows/build.yml:42 unpinned action reference [confidence high] CI workflows (zizmor)
high zizmor/unpinned-uses .github/workflows/build.yml:49 unpinned action reference [confidence high] CI workflows (zizmor)
high zizmor/unpinned-uses .github/workflows/build.yml:64 unpinned action reference [confidence high] CI workflows (zizmor)
high zizmor/unpinned-uses .github/workflows/build.yml:77 unpinned action reference [confidence high] CI workflows (zizmor)
high zizmor/unpinned-uses .github/workflows/test.yml:112 unpinned action reference [confidence high] CI workflows (zizmor)
high zizmor/unpinned-uses .github/workflows/test.yml:22 unpinned action reference [confidence high] CI workflows (zizmor)
high zizmor/unpinned-uses .github/workflows/test.yml:25 unpinned action reference [confidence high] CI workflows (zizmor)
high zizmor/unpinned-uses .github/workflows/test.yml:56 unpinned action reference [confidence high] CI workflows (zizmor)
high zizmor/unpinned-uses .github/workflows/test.yml:59 unpinned action reference [confidence high] CI workflows (zizmor)
high zizmor/unpinned-uses .github/workflows/test.yml:86 unpinned action reference [confidence high] CI workflows (zizmor)
high zizmor/unpinned-uses .github/workflows/test.yml:89 unpinned action reference [confidence high] CI workflows (zizmor)
high opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.dangerous-subprocess-use-audit scripts/build.py:76 Detected subprocess function 'run' without a static string. If this data can be controlled by a malicious actor, it may be an instance of command injection. Audit the use of this call to ensure it is not controllable by an external... Static analysis (opengrep)
medium opengrep/python.lang.best-practice.logging-error-without-handling src/votetracker/database.py:244 Errors should only be logged when handled. The code logs the error and propogates the exception, consider reducing the level to warning or info. Lint
medium opengrep/python.lang.best-practice.logging-error-without-handling src/votetracker/database.py:402 Errors should only be logged when handled. The code logs the error and propogates the exception, consider reducing the level to warning or info. Lint
medium opengrep/python.lang.maintainability.useless-if-body src/votetracker/pages/settings.py:1671 Useless if statement; both blocks have the same body Lint
medium zizmor/excessive-permissions .github/workflows/build.yml:1 overly broad permissions [confidence medium] CI workflows (zizmor)
medium zizmor/excessive-permissions .github/workflows/build.yml:10 overly broad permissions [confidence medium] CI workflows (zizmor)
medium zizmor/artipacked .github/workflows/build.yml:18 credential persistence through GitHub Actions artifacts [confidence low] CI workflows (zizmor)
medium zizmor/excessive-permissions .github/workflows/test.yml:1 overly broad permissions [confidence medium] CI workflows (zizmor)
medium zizmor/excessive-permissions .github/workflows/test.yml:11 overly broad permissions [confidence medium] CI workflows (zizmor)
medium zizmor/artipacked .github/workflows/test.yml:21 credential persistence through GitHub Actions artifacts [confidence low] CI workflows (zizmor)
medium zizmor/excessive-permissions .github/workflows/test.yml:50 overly broad permissions [confidence medium] CI workflows (zizmor)
medium zizmor/artipacked .github/workflows/test.yml:55 credential persistence through GitHub Actions artifacts [confidence low] CI workflows (zizmor)
medium zizmor/excessive-permissions .github/workflows/test.yml:80 overly broad permissions [confidence medium] CI workflows (zizmor)
medium zizmor/artipacked .github/workflows/test.yml:85 credential persistence through GitHub Actions artifacts [confidence low] CI workflows (zizmor)
medium osv/RUSTSEC-2026-0386 Cargo.lock [email protected] (crates.io) is affected by RUSTSEC-2026-0386 Dependencies (osv-scanner)
medium osv/RUSTSEC-2026-0459 Cargo.lock [email protected] (crates.io) is affected by RUSTSEC-2026-0459 Dependencies (osv-scanner)
medium osv/RUSTSEC-2026-0486 Cargo.lock [email protected] (crates.io) is affected by RUSTSEC-2026-0486 Dependencies (osv-scanner)
low gitleaks/generic-api-key src/votetracker/classeviva.py:37 Possible generic-api-key secret in the current tree Secrets (gitleaks)
info zizmor/superfluous-actions .github/workflows/build.yml:77 action functionality is already included by the runner [confidence high] CI workflows (zizmor)

Tools and coverage

Every analyzer that ran on this commit. A failed or skipped tool is a coverage gap: its share of the score is left out and the coverage figure drops.

AnalyzerPillarStatusVersionFindingsNote
AI tool configurationAI provenanceoksignatures-v10
Explicit AI attributionAI provenanceoksignatures-v10
Release velocityAI provenanceokprov-40
Coding styleAI provenanceok—0
Commit velocityAI provenanceokprov-40
Findings in AI-written linesAI provenanceokgit-blame0
Complexity (lizard)Code qualityoklizard 1.25.10
DocumentationCode qualityok—0
Duplication (jscpd)Code qualityokrepotrust-dup-w60
LintCode qualityokopengrep 1.33.1; rules f1d2b562b4143
Tests and CICode qualityok—0
Type safetyCode qualityok—0
CI workflows (zizmor)Securityokzizmor 1.32.025
Dependencies (osv-scanner)Securityokosv-scanner version: 2.7.13
Release downloadsSecurityok—0
Security postureSecurityok—0
Package registriesSecurityok—0
Static analysis (opengrep)Securityokopengrep 1.33.1; rules f1d2b562b4141
OpenSSF ScorecardSecurityskipped—0no published OpenSSF Scorecard result for this repo
Secrets (gitleaks)Securityokgitleaks 8.30.11

Score history

Scores from different scoring versions aren't directly comparable.

ScoredCommitScoringAI provenanceQualitySecurity
2026-11-142097876e77b7prov-5+qual-2+sec-234%6668
2026-11-142097876e77b7prov-4+qual-2+sec-234%6668

Embed a badge

Maintainers can show these in a README. Badges update when the repository is re-scored.

[![RepoTrust ai](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/badge/github.com/mambucodev/votetracker/ai.svg)](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/r/github.com/mambucodev/votetracker/)
[![RepoTrust quality](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/badge/github.com/mambucodev/votetracker/quality.svg)](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/r/github.com/mambucodev/votetracker/)
[![RepoTrust security](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/badge/github.com/mambucodev/votetracker/security.svg)](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/r/github.com/mambucodev/votetracker/)
Full text report

Scores

Pillar Score Signal Confidence Coverage
AI provenance (estimated AI-generated share) 34 explicit 95% 100%
Code quality 66 adequate 90% 100%
Security 68 weak 85% 100%

AI provenance

Explicit AI attribution on 34% of first-party code added; an estimated 34% including velocity signals.

  • Explicitly attributed share (lower bound): 33.6%
  • Unattributed share in AI-consistent velocity bursts: 30.3%
  • Estimated AI-generated share: 33.6%
AI tool Attributed commits Lines added
Claude Code 43 5,798
Jules 19 779
  • AI tooling configured in repo: claude-code, gemini, generic-agent

Current source lines last changed by AI-attributed commits: 4,851 of 13,766.

Findings per 1,000 lines AI-attributed Other Ratio
Quality 0.412 0.112 3.68x
Security 0.206 0.112 1.84x
  • Stylometry index: 0.44 per 1,000 lines (narrated steps 5, placeholders 0, assistant phrasing 0, emoji 2). Reported as a signal, not scored.
Month Lines added Attributed to AI
2026-01 14,444 40%
2026-02 582 0%
2026-04 364 0%
2026-09 4,132 17%
2026-10 64 100%

Evidence

AI provenance describes how code was produced; it is not a quality judgment. Unless attribution is explicit, these are signals consistent with AI generation, not proof. Squash/rebase workflows, imported code, and rewritten history reduce accuracy.

Code quality

Code quality is adequate: test-to-source ratio 0.13, CI runs tests; 22% of function code in complex or long functions; 5% duplicated lines. Weakest area: type safety.

Area Score
Complexity (lizard) 52
Duplication 73
Code smells (Opengrep) 95
Tests and CI 63
Documentation 65
Type safety 40
Process (Scorecard review/maintenance) n/a
  • Functions: 446; mean complexity 3.5, 90th percentile 8; 14 complex and 8 long functions
  • Duplicated lines: 5.3% of 10,494 compared
  • Tests: 1,752 test lines for 13,766 source lines (ratio 0.13); CI test commands: unittest; 4% of recent source commits also change tests
  • Docs missing or thin: contributing, changelog

Most complex functions:

Security

Security posture is weak: 3 known vulnerabilities in 3 dependencies; 1 high-severity SAST findings; 14 high-severity workflow issues. Weakest area: posture.

Area Score
Secrets (gitleaks, tree + history) 97
Static analysis (Opengrep) 98
Vulnerable dependencies (OSV) 86
CI workflows (zizmor) 4
Posture (policy, updates, signing, lockfiles) 0
OpenSSF Scorecard n/a
  • Known vulnerabilities: 3 in 3 packages (critical 0, high 0, medium 1, low 0)

  • Posture checks passed: none; missing: security policy, dependency updates, signed commits, lockfiles

Top findings

Severity Finding Location
high opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.dangerous-subprocess-use-audit: Detected subprocess function 'run' without a static string. If this data can be controlled by a malicious actor, it may be an instance of command injection. Audit the use of this call to ensure it is not controllable by an external resource. You may consider using 'shlex.escape()'. [confidence low] scripts/build.py:76
high zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] .github/workflows/build.yml:18
high zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] .github/workflows/build.yml:21
high zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] .github/workflows/build.yml:35
high zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] .github/workflows/build.yml:42
high zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] .github/workflows/build.yml:49
high zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] .github/workflows/build.yml:64
high zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] .github/workflows/build.yml:77
high zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] .github/workflows/test.yml:22
high zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] .github/workflows/test.yml:25
high zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] .github/workflows/test.yml:56
high zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] .github/workflows/test.yml:59
high zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] .github/workflows/test.yml:86
high zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] .github/workflows/test.yml:89
high zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] .github/workflows/test.yml:112
medium osv/RUSTSEC-2026-0459: [email protected] (crates.io) is affected by RUSTSEC-2026-0459 Cargo.lock
medium osv/RUSTSEC-2026-0486: [email protected] (crates.io) is affected by RUSTSEC-2026-0486 Cargo.lock
medium osv/RUSTSEC-2026-0386: [email protected] (crates.io) is affected by RUSTSEC-2026-0386 Cargo.lock
medium zizmor/artipacked: credential persistence through GitHub Actions artifacts [confidence low] .github/workflows/build.yml:18
medium zizmor/excessive-permissions: overly broad permissions [confidence medium] .github/workflows/build.yml:1
medium zizmor/excessive-permissions: overly broad permissions [confidence medium] .github/workflows/build.yml:10
medium zizmor/artipacked: credential persistence through GitHub Actions artifacts [confidence low] .github/workflows/test.yml:21
medium zizmor/artipacked: credential persistence through GitHub Actions artifacts [confidence low] .github/workflows/test.yml:55
medium zizmor/artipacked: credential persistence through GitHub Actions artifacts [confidence low] .github/workflows/test.yml:85
medium zizmor/excessive-permissions: overly broad permissions [confidence medium] .github/workflows/test.yml:1

Static signals only: the scorer never runs the project's code. Secret findings are pattern matches that were not verified, and secret values are never stored.

Distribution signals

Signals consistent with a repository that exists to distribute a download. They are heuristics, not a verdict; release files were not downloaded or inspected.

Repository profile

  • Source lines: 13,766; test lines: 1,752
Language Lines
Python 12,814
Rust 2,606
Shell 98