Leaderboard github.com

linuxct/pulseloop-android

Subscription free, privacy first, AI-native health companion app for smart rings

View repository ↗
Kotlin
★ 6
commit e61dc104c516
scored 2026-11-14
scoring prov-5+qual-2+sec-2

AI provenance

none-detected

Confidence: 50%
Coverage: 100%

Estimated share of AI-generated code. Explicit attribution is a lower bound.

Code quality

62/100

weak

Confidence: 90%
Coverage: 100%

Complexity, duplication, lint density, tests, CI, docs and review process.

Security

72/100

adequate

Confidence: 85%
Coverage: 100%

Secrets, static analysis, vulnerable dependencies, CI and supply-chain posture.

Dispute or request a re-score Full report JSON

AI provenance

0% none-detected

No AI attribution or AI-consistent velocity signals detected.

How the score is built

Explicitly attributed share0%
Unattributed share in AI-pace bursts0%
Estimated AI-generated share0%
AI tool configuration files0
Work sessions at AI pace0
Releases at AI pace0
Coding-style index (1.0+ means possible)0.00

Lines added per month all AI-attributed share

2026-0625,148 · 0% AI
2026-077,978 · 0% AI

Evidence by analyzer

Explicit AI attributionok

attributed_commit_share: 0.0%
attributed_commits: 0
attributed_loc: 0
attributed_loc_share: 0.0%
commits: 41
effective_loc: 33,126
tools_detected: 0

AI tool configurationok

artifacts: 0
tools_configured: 0
workflow_agents: 0

Commit velocityok

excluded_import_loc: 28,875
flagged_loc: 0
flagged_loc_share: 0.0%
flagged_units: 0
max_loc_per_hour: 349.50
measured_loc: 4,251
median_loc_per_hour: 114.86
pr_timed_units: 0
pre_ai_era_burst_loc: 0
pre_ai_era_bursts: 0
pre_ai_era_measured_loc: 0
work_units: 18

Release velocityok

flagged_releases: 0
max_loc_per_day: 4,488
releases: 15

Coding styleok

count:assistant_voice: 0
count:emoji_in_code: 0
count:narrated_steps: 0
count:placeholder: 0
files:assistant_voice: 0
files:emoji_in_code: 0
files:narrated_steps: 0
files:placeholder: 0
index: 0
lines_scanned: 30,048
per_kloc:assistant_voice: 0
per_kloc:emoji_in_code: 0
per_kloc:narrated_steps: 0
per_kloc:placeholder: 0

Code quality

62 weak

Code quality is weak: test-to-source ratio 0.01, no CI test run detected; 13% of function code in complex or long functions; 10% duplicated lines. Weakest area: testing.

How the score is built

Complexity68
Duplication56
Lint and smells100
Tests and CI37
Documentation65
Type safetynot measured
Review processnot measured

Evidence by analyzer

Complexity (lizard)ok10 items

complex_functions: 13
function_nloc: 14,094
functions: 1,190
long_functions: 7
many_param_functions: 6
mean_ccn: 2.57
p90_ccn: 6
risky_nloc_share: 12.7%

Duplication (jscpd)ok10 items

compared_lines: 19,018
duplicated_lines: 1,865
duplicated_share: 9.8%
files: 248

Lintok

category:correctness: 1
findings: 1
scanned_lines: 30,048
weighted_findings: 0.25

Tests and CIok2 items

CI config: .github/workflows/ci.yml .github/workflows/ci.yml
CI config: .github/workflows/release.yml .github/workflows/release.yml

check:ci_present: yes
check:ci_runs_lint: no
check:ci_runs_tests: no
check:has_tests: yes
check:test_ratio: no
check:tests_cochange: no
ci_files: 2
cochange_commits: 33
cochange_share: 3.0%
source_lines: 30,048
test_lines: 239
test_ratio: 0.01

Documentationok2 items

README.md README.md
LICENSE LICENSE

check:changelog: no
check:contributing: no
check:license: yes
check:readme: yes
readme_lines: 156

Type safetyskipped

Security

72 adequate

Security posture is adequate: 5 high-severity workflow issues. Weakest area: posture.

How the score is built

Secrets100
Static analysis (SAST)100
Vulnerable dependenciesnot measured
CI workflows34
Security posture0
OpenSSF Scorecardnot measured

Evidence by analyzer

OpenSSF Scorecardskipped

no published OpenSSF Scorecard result for this repo

Package registriesskipped

no registry dependencies declared

Secrets (gitleaks)ok

secrets_current: 0
secrets_history: 0
secrets_low_confidence: 0
secrets_nonprod: 0

Static analysis (opengrep)ok

findings: 1
findings_high: 0
findings_low: 0
findings_medium: 1
parse_errors: 3
scanned_lines: 30,048
weighted_findings: 0.25

Dependencies (osv-scanner)skipped

CI workflows (zizmor)ok

findings: 12
findings_high: 5
findings_low: 4
findings_medium: 3
penalty: 64.80
workflows: 2

Security postureok

check:dependency_updates: no
check:lockfiles: yes
check:security_policy: no
check:signed_commits: no
signed_commit_share: 2.4%
unpinned_manifests: 0

Release downloadsok5 items

binary_assets: 10
signals: 1
suspicious: 0

Findings

5 high4 medium1 low4 info

Severity	Rule	Location	Message	Tool
high	`zizmor/unpinned-uses`	.github/workflows/ci.yml:15	unpinned action reference [confidence high]	CI workflows (zizmor)
high	`zizmor/unpinned-uses`	.github/workflows/ci.yml:18	unpinned action reference [confidence high]	CI workflows (zizmor)
high	`zizmor/unpinned-uses`	.github/workflows/ci.yml:33	unpinned action reference [confidence high]	CI workflows (zizmor)
high	`zizmor/unpinned-uses`	.github/workflows/release.yml:13	unpinned action reference [confidence high]	CI workflows (zizmor)
high	`zizmor/unpinned-uses`	.github/workflows/release.yml:17	unpinned action reference [confidence high]	CI workflows (zizmor)
medium	`zizmor/excessive-permissions`	.github/workflows/ci.yml:10	overly broad permissions [confidence medium]	CI workflows (zizmor)
medium	`zizmor/artipacked`	.github/workflows/ci.yml:14	credential persistence through GitHub Actions artifacts [confidence low]	CI workflows (zizmor)
medium	`zizmor/artipacked`	.github/workflows/release.yml:13	credential persistence through GitHub Actions artifacts [confidence low]	CI workflows (zizmor)
medium	`opengrep/kotlin.lang.security.unencrypted-socket`	app/src/main/kotlin/space/linuxct/pulseloop/data/network/OAuthCallbackServer.kt:13	This socket is not encrypted. The traffic could be read by an attacker intercepting the network traffic. Use an SSLSocket created by 'SSLSocketFactory' or 'SSLServerSocketFactory' instead [confidence low]	Static analysis (opengrep)
low	`opengrep/bash.lang.correctness.unquoted-command-substitution-in-command`	tools/home-assistant/test-webhook.sh:27	The result of command substitution $(...) or `...`, if unquoted, is split on whitespace or other separators specified by the IFS variable. You should surround it with double quotes to avoid splitting the result.	Lint
info	`zizmor/template-injection`	.github/workflows/release.yml:53	code injection via template expansion [confidence low]	CI workflows (zizmor)
info	`zizmor/template-injection`	.github/workflows/release.yml:71	code injection via template expansion [confidence low]	CI workflows (zizmor)
info	`zizmor/template-injection`	.github/workflows/release.yml:72	code injection via template expansion [confidence low]	CI workflows (zizmor)
info	`zizmor/template-injection`	.github/workflows/release.yml:74	code injection via template expansion [confidence low]	CI workflows (zizmor)

Tools and coverage

Every analyzer that ran on this commit. A failed or skipped tool is a coverage gap: its share of the score is left out and the coverage figure drops.

Analyzer	Pillar	Status	Version	Findings	Note
AI tool configuration	AI provenance	ok	`signatures-v1`	0
Explicit AI attribution	AI provenance	ok	`signatures-v1`	0
Release velocity	AI provenance	ok	`prov-4`	0
Coding style	AI provenance	ok	`—`	0
Commit velocity	AI provenance	ok	`prov-4`	0
Complexity (lizard)	Code quality	ok	`lizard 1.25.1`	0
Documentation	Code quality	ok	`—`	0
Duplication (jscpd)	Code quality	ok	`repotrust-dup-w6`	0
Lint	Code quality	ok	`opengrep 1.33.1; rules f1d2b562b414`	1
Tests and CI	Code quality	ok	`—`	0
Type safety	Code quality	skipped	`—`	0
CI workflows (zizmor)	Security	ok	`zizmor 1.32.0`	12
Dependencies (osv-scanner)	Security	skipped	`—`	0
Release downloads	Security	ok	`—`	0
Security posture	Security	ok	`—`	0
Package registries	Security	skipped	`—`	0	no registry dependencies declared
Static analysis (opengrep)	Security	ok	`opengrep 1.33.1; rules f1d2b562b414`	1
OpenSSF Scorecard	Security	skipped	`—`	0	no published OpenSSF Scorecard result for this repo
Secrets (gitleaks)	Security	ok	`gitleaks 8.30.1`	0

Score history

Scores from different scoring versions aren't directly comparable.

Scored	Commit	Scoring	AI provenance	Quality	Security
2026-11-14	`e61dc104c516`	`prov-5+qual-2+sec-2`	0%	62	72
2026-11-14	`e61dc104c516`	`prov-4+qual-2+sec-2`	0%	62	72

Embed a badge

Maintainers can show these in a README. Badges update when the repository is re-scored.

[![RepoTrust ai](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/badge/github.com/linuxct/pulseloop-android/ai.svg)](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/r/github.com/linuxct/pulseloop-android/)

[![RepoTrust quality](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/badge/github.com/linuxct/pulseloop-android/quality.svg)](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/r/github.com/linuxct/pulseloop-android/)

[![RepoTrust security](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/badge/github.com/linuxct/pulseloop-android/security.svg)](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/r/github.com/linuxct/pulseloop-android/)

Full text report

Repository: https://github.com/linuxct/pulseloop-android
Commit: e61dc104c51668c36e01e97151e116ba1770f543
Generated: 2026-11-14T14:52:06+00:00
Scorer 0.1.0, scoring prov-5+qual-2+sec-2, report schema v2

Scores

Pillar	Score	Signal	Confidence	Coverage
AI provenance (estimated AI-generated share)	0	none-detected	50%	100%
Code quality	62	weak	90%	100%
Security	72	adequate	85%	100%

AI provenance

No AI attribution or AI-consistent velocity signals detected.

Explicitly attributed share (lower bound): 0.0%
Unattributed share in AI-consistent velocity bursts: 0.0%
Estimated AI-generated share: 0.0%

Month	Lines added	Attributed to AI
2026-06	25,148	0%
2026-07	7,978	0%

AI provenance describes how code was produced; it is not a quality judgment. Unless attribution is explicit, these are signals consistent with AI generation, not proof. Squash/rebase workflows, imported code, and rewritten history reduce accuracy.

Code quality

Code quality is weak: test-to-source ratio 0.01, no CI test run detected; 13% of function code in complex or long functions; 10% duplicated lines. Weakest area: testing.

Area	Score
Complexity (lizard)	68
Duplication	56
Code smells (Opengrep)	100
Tests and CI	37
Documentation	65
Type safety	n/a
Process (Scorecard review/maintenance)	n/a

Functions: 1,190; mean complexity 2.6, 90th percentile 6; 13 complex and 7 long functions
Duplicated lines: 9.8% of 19,018 compared
Tests: 239 test lines for 30,048 source lines (ratio 0.01); CI test commands: none detected; 3% of recent source commits also change tests
Docs missing or thin: contributing, changelog

Most complex functions:

Security

Security posture is adequate: 5 high-severity workflow issues. Weakest area: posture.

Area	Score
Secrets (gitleaks, tree + history)	100
Static analysis (Opengrep)	100
Vulnerable dependencies (OSV)	n/a
CI workflows (zizmor)	34
Posture (policy, updates, signing, lockfiles)	0
OpenSSF Scorecard	n/a

Posture checks passed: lockfiles; missing: security policy, dependency updates, signed commits

Top findings

Severity	Finding	Location
high	`zizmor/unpinned-uses`: unpinned action reference [confidence high]	.github/workflows/ci.yml:15
high	`zizmor/unpinned-uses`: unpinned action reference [confidence high]	.github/workflows/ci.yml:18
high	`zizmor/unpinned-uses`: unpinned action reference [confidence high]	.github/workflows/ci.yml:33
high	`zizmor/unpinned-uses`: unpinned action reference [confidence high]	.github/workflows/release.yml:13
high	`zizmor/unpinned-uses`: unpinned action reference [confidence high]	.github/workflows/release.yml:17
medium	`opengrep/kotlin.lang.security.unencrypted-socket`: This socket is not encrypted. The traffic could be read by an attacker intercepting the network traffic. Use an SSLSocket created by 'SSLSocketFactory' or 'SSLServerSocketFactory' instead [confidence low]	app/src/main/kotlin/space/linuxct/pulseloop/data/network/OAuthCallbackServer.kt:13
medium	`zizmor/artipacked`: credential persistence through GitHub Actions artifacts [confidence low]	.github/workflows/ci.yml:14
medium	`zizmor/excessive-permissions`: overly broad permissions [confidence medium]	.github/workflows/ci.yml:10
medium	`zizmor/artipacked`: credential persistence through GitHub Actions artifacts [confidence low]	.github/workflows/release.yml:13
info	`zizmor/template-injection`: code injection via template expansion [confidence low]	.github/workflows/release.yml:53
info	`zizmor/template-injection`: code injection via template expansion [confidence low]	.github/workflows/release.yml:71
info	`zizmor/template-injection`: code injection via template expansion [confidence low]	.github/workflows/release.yml:72
info	`zizmor/template-injection`: code injection via template expansion [confidence low]	.github/workflows/release.yml:74

Static signals only: the scorer never runs the project's code. Secret findings are pattern matches that were not verified, and secret values are never stored.

Distribution signals

binary-release-asset: release v2.1.5 ships pulseloop-2.1.5.apk (51 downloads)
binary-release-asset: release v2.1.4 ships pulseloop-2.1.4.apk (2 downloads)
binary-release-asset: release v2.1.3 ships pulseloop-2.1.3.apk (0 downloads)
binary-release-asset: release v2.1.2 ships pulseloop-2.1.2.apk (0 downloads)
binary-release-asset: release v2.1.1 ships pulseloop-2.1.1.apk (0 downloads)

Signals consistent with a repository that exists to distribute a download. They are heuristics, not a verdict; release files were not downloaded or inspected.

Repository profile

Source lines: 30,048; test lines: 239

Language	Lines
Kotlin	30,246
Shell	41