Leaderboard github.com

lanceylai/TSWeChat

A WeChat alternative. Written in Swift 5.

View repository ↗
Swift
★ 3,743
commit a1d371a7b25e
scored 2026-11-14
scoring prov-5+qual-2+sec-2

AI provenance

none-detected

Confidence: 52%
Coverage: 100%

Estimated share of AI-generated code. Explicit attribution is a lower bound.

Code quality

61/100

weak

Confidence: 90%
Coverage: 100%

Complexity, duplication, lint density, tests, CI, docs and review process.

Security

59/100

weak

Confidence: 85%
Coverage: 100%

Secrets, static analysis, vulnerable dependencies, CI and supply-chain posture.

Dispute or request a re-score Full report JSON

AI provenance

0% none-detected

No AI attribution or AI-consistent velocity signals detected.

How the score is built

Explicitly attributed share0%
Unattributed share in AI-pace bursts0%
Estimated AI-generated share0%
AI tool configuration files0
Work sessions at AI pace0
Releases at AI pacenot measured
Coding-style index (1.0+ means possible)0.46

Lines added per month all AI-attributed share

2016-024,937 · 0% AI
2016-036,990 · 0% AI
2016-040 · 0% AI
2016-0853 · 0% AI
2016-093 · 0% AI
2016-111,625 · 0% AI
2017-032 · 0% AI
2018-03172 · 0% AI
2018-0418 · 0% AI
2019-021 · 0% AI
2019-07139 · 0% AI

Evidence by analyzer

Explicit AI attributionok

attributed_commit_share: 0.0%
attributed_commits: 0
attributed_loc: 0
attributed_loc_share: 0.0%
commits: 49
effective_loc: 13,940
tools_detected: 0

AI tool configurationok

artifacts: 0
tools_configured: 0
workflow_agents: 0

Commit velocityok

excluded_import_loc: 10,808
flagged_loc: 0
flagged_loc_share: 0.0%
flagged_units: 0
max_loc_per_hour: 341.25
measured_loc: 3,132
median_loc_per_hour: 52.43
pr_timed_units: 3
pre_ai_era_burst_loc: 0
pre_ai_era_bursts: 0
pre_ai_era_measured_loc: 3,132
work_units: 27

Release velocityskipped

Coding styleok

count:assistant_voice: 0
count:emoji_in_code: 8
count:narrated_steps: 0
count:placeholder: 0
files:assistant_voice: 0
files:emoji_in_code: 1
files:narrated_steps: 0
files:placeholder: 0
index: 0.46
lines_scanned: 8,675
per_kloc:assistant_voice: 0
per_kloc:emoji_in_code: 0.92
per_kloc:narrated_steps: 0
per_kloc:placeholder: 0

Code quality

61 weak

Code quality is weak: test-to-source ratio 0.00, no CI test run detected; 1% of function code in complex or long functions; 4% duplicated lines. Weakest area: testing.

How the score is built

Complexity96
Duplication81
Lint and smells93
Tests and CI0
Documentation65
Type safetynot measured
Review processnot measured

Evidence by analyzer

Complexity (lizard)ok1 item

timeAgoSinceDate in TSWeChat/Helpers/NSDate+Extension.swift: complexity 19, 60 lines

complex_functions: 1
function_nloc: 4,240
functions: 510
long_functions: 0
many_param_functions: 0
mean_ccn: 1.88
p90_ccn: 4
risky_nloc_share: 1.4%

Duplication (jscpd)ok10 items

compared_lines: 5,453
duplicated_lines: 193
duplicated_share: 3.5%
files: 90

Lintok

category:correctness: 10
findings: 10
scanned_lines: 8,675
weighted_findings: 2.50

Tests and CIok

check:ci_present: no
check:ci_runs_lint: no
check:ci_runs_tests: no
check:has_tests: no
check:test_ratio: no
check:tests_cochange: no
ci_files: 0
cochange_commits: 32
cochange_share: 0.0%
source_lines: 8,675
test_lines: 0
test_ratio: 0

Documentationok2 items

README.md README.md
LICENSE LICENSE

check:changelog: no
check:contributing: no
check:license: yes
check:readme: yes
readme_lines: 57

Type safetyskipped

Security

59 weak

Security posture is weak: 1 possible secret(s) in the tree, 1 only in history. Weakest area: posture.

How the score is built

Secrets49
Static analysis (SAST)100
Vulnerable dependenciesnot measured
CI workflowsnot measured
Security posture0
OpenSSF Scorecardnot measured

Evidence by analyzer

OpenSSF Scorecardskipped

no published OpenSSF Scorecard result for this repo

Package registriesskipped

no registry dependencies declared

Secrets (gitleaks)ok

secrets_current: 1
secrets_history: 1
secrets_low_confidence: 4
secrets_nonprod: 0

Static analysis (opengrep)ok

findings: 0
findings_high: 0
findings_low: 0
findings_medium: 0
parse_errors: 67
scanned_lines: 8,675
weighted_findings: 0

Dependencies (osv-scanner)skipped

CI workflows (zizmor)skipped

Security postureok

check:dependency_updates: no
check:lockfiles: yes
check:security_policy: no
check:signed_commits: no
signed_commit_share: 2.0%
unpinned_manifests: 0

Release downloadsok

binary_assets: 0
signals: 0
suspicious: 0

Findings

1 high1 medium14 low

Severity	Rule	Location	Message	Tool
high	`gitleaks/square-access-token`	Pods/Pods.xcodeproj/project.pbxproj:779	Possible square-access-token secret in the current tree	Secrets (gitleaks)
medium	`gitleaks/square-access-token`	Pods/Pods.xcodeproj/xcshareddata/xcschemes/Alamofire.xcscheme:17	Possible square-access-token secret in history (commit f73704814f); removed from the current tree but still retrievable	Secrets (gitleaks)
low	`opengrep/bash.lang.correctness.unquoted-variable-expansion-in-command`	Scripts/xcodebuild.sh:103	Variable expansions must be double-quoted so as to prevent being split into multiple pieces according to whitespace or whichever separator is specified by the IFS variable. If you really wish to split the variable's contents, you may...	Lint
low	`opengrep/bash.lang.correctness.unquoted-variable-expansion-in-command`	Scripts/xcodebuild.sh:104	Variable expansions must be double-quoted so as to prevent being split into multiple pieces according to whitespace or whichever separator is specified by the IFS variable. If you really wish to split the variable's contents, you may...	Lint
low	`opengrep/bash.lang.correctness.unquoted-variable-expansion-in-command`	Scripts/xcodebuild.sh:106	Variable expansions must be double-quoted so as to prevent being split into multiple pieces according to whitespace or whichever separator is specified by the IFS variable. If you really wish to split the variable's contents, you may...	Lint
low	`opengrep/bash.lang.correctness.unquoted-variable-expansion-in-command`	Scripts/xcodebuild.sh:107	Variable expansions must be double-quoted so as to prevent being split into multiple pieces according to whitespace or whichever separator is specified by the IFS variable. If you really wish to split the variable's contents, you may...	Lint
low	`opengrep/bash.lang.correctness.unquoted-command-substitution-in-command`	Scripts/xcodebuild.sh:115	The result of command substitution $(...) or `...`, if unquoted, is split on whitespace or other separators specified by the IFS variable. You should surround it with double quotes to avoid splitting the result.	Lint
low	`opengrep/bash.lang.correctness.unquoted-variable-expansion-in-command`	Scripts/xcodebuild.sh:115	Variable expansions must be double-quoted so as to prevent being split into multiple pieces according to whitespace or whichever separator is specified by the IFS variable. If you really wish to split the variable's contents, you may...	Lint
low	`opengrep/bash.lang.correctness.unquoted-variable-expansion-in-command`	Scripts/xcodebuild.sh:120	Variable expansions must be double-quoted so as to prevent being split into multiple pieces according to whitespace or whichever separator is specified by the IFS variable. If you really wish to split the variable's contents, you may...	Lint
low	`opengrep/bash.lang.correctness.unquoted-variable-expansion-in-command`	Scripts/xcodebuild.sh:59	Variable expansions must be double-quoted so as to prevent being split into multiple pieces according to whitespace or whichever separator is specified by the IFS variable. If you really wish to split the variable's contents, you may...	Lint
low	`opengrep/bash.lang.correctness.unquoted-variable-expansion-in-command`	Scripts/xcodebuild.sh:62	Variable expansions must be double-quoted so as to prevent being split into multiple pieces according to whitespace or whichever separator is specified by the IFS variable. If you really wish to split the variable's contents, you may...	Lint
low	`opengrep/bash.lang.correctness.unquoted-variable-expansion-in-command`	Scripts/xcodebuild.sh:66	Variable expansions must be double-quoted so as to prevent being split into multiple pieces according to whitespace or whichever separator is specified by the IFS variable. If you really wish to split the variable's contents, you may...	Lint
low	`gitleaks/generic-api-key`	Podfile.lock:96	Possible generic-api-key secret in the current tree	Secrets (gitleaks)
low	`gitleaks/generic-api-key`	Pods/Manifest.lock:96	Possible generic-api-key secret in the current tree	Secrets (gitleaks)
low	`gitleaks/generic-api-key`	Scripts/apns.php:5	Possible generic-api-key secret in the current tree	Secrets (gitleaks)
low	`gitleaks/generic-api-key`	TSWeChat/Resources/JSON/chat.json:52	Possible generic-api-key secret in the current tree	Secrets (gitleaks)

Tools and coverage

Every analyzer that ran on this commit. A failed or skipped tool is a coverage gap: its share of the score is left out and the coverage figure drops.

Analyzer	Pillar	Status	Version	Findings	Note
AI tool configuration	AI provenance	ok	`signatures-v1`	0
Explicit AI attribution	AI provenance	ok	`signatures-v1`	0
Release velocity	AI provenance	skipped	`—`	0
Coding style	AI provenance	ok	`—`	0
Commit velocity	AI provenance	ok	`prov-4`	0
Complexity (lizard)	Code quality	ok	`lizard 1.25.1`	0
Documentation	Code quality	ok	`—`	0
Duplication (jscpd)	Code quality	ok	`repotrust-dup-w6`	0
Lint	Code quality	ok	`opengrep 1.33.1; rules f1d2b562b414`	10
Tests and CI	Code quality	ok	`—`	0
Type safety	Code quality	skipped	`—`	0
CI workflows (zizmor)	Security	skipped	`—`	0
Dependencies (osv-scanner)	Security	skipped	`—`	0
Release downloads	Security	ok	`—`	0
Security posture	Security	ok	`—`	0
Package registries	Security	skipped	`—`	0	no registry dependencies declared
Static analysis (opengrep)	Security	ok	`opengrep 1.33.1; rules f1d2b562b414`	0
OpenSSF Scorecard	Security	skipped	`—`	0	no published OpenSSF Scorecard result for this repo
Secrets (gitleaks)	Security	ok	`gitleaks 8.30.1`	6

Score history

Scores from different scoring versions aren't directly comparable.

Scored	Commit	Scoring	AI provenance	Quality	Security
2026-11-14	`a1d371a7b25e`	`prov-5+qual-2+sec-2`	0%	61	59
2026-11-14	`a1d371a7b25e`	`prov-4+qual-2+sec-2`	0%	61	59

Embed a badge

Maintainers can show these in a README. Badges update when the repository is re-scored.

[![RepoTrust ai](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/badge/github.com/lanceylai/TSWeChat/ai.svg)](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/r/github.com/lanceylai/TSWeChat/)

[![RepoTrust quality](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/badge/github.com/lanceylai/TSWeChat/quality.svg)](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/r/github.com/lanceylai/TSWeChat/)

[![RepoTrust security](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/badge/github.com/lanceylai/TSWeChat/security.svg)](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/r/github.com/lanceylai/TSWeChat/)

Full text report

Repository: https://github.com/lanceylai/TSWeChat
Commit: a1d371a7b25e8e8eea8747e37289cd3386516602
Generated: 2026-11-14T14:52:06+00:00
Scorer 0.1.0, scoring prov-5+qual-2+sec-2, report schema v2

Scores

Pillar	Score	Signal	Confidence	Coverage
AI provenance (estimated AI-generated share)	0	none-detected	52%	100%
Code quality	61	weak	90%	100%
Security	59	weak	85%	100%

AI provenance

No AI attribution or AI-consistent velocity signals detected.

Explicitly attributed share (lower bound): 0.0%
Unattributed share in AI-consistent velocity bursts: 0.0%
Estimated AI-generated share: 0.0%
Stylometry index: 0.46 per 1,000 lines (narrated steps 0, placeholders 0, assistant phrasing 0, emoji 8). Reported as a signal, not scored.

Month	Lines added	Attributed to AI
2016-02	4,937	0%
2016-03	6,990	0%
2016-08	53	0%
2016-09	3	0%
2016-11	1,625	0%
2017-03	2	0%
2018-03	172	0%
2018-04	18	0%
2019-02	1	0%
2019-07	139	0%

AI provenance describes how code was produced; it is not a quality judgment. Unless attribution is explicit, these are signals consistent with AI generation, not proof. Squash/rebase workflows, imported code, and rewritten history reduce accuracy.

Code quality

Code quality is weak: test-to-source ratio 0.00, no CI test run detected; 1% of function code in complex or long functions; 4% duplicated lines. Weakest area: testing.

Area	Score
Complexity (lizard)	96
Duplication	81
Code smells (Opengrep)	93
Tests and CI	0
Documentation	65
Type safety	n/a
Process (Scorecard review/maintenance)	n/a

Functions: 510; mean complexity 1.9, 90th percentile 4; 1 complex and 0 long functions
Duplicated lines: 3.5% of 5,453 compared
Tests: 0 test lines for 8,675 source lines (ratio 0.00); CI test commands: none detected; 0% of recent source commits also change tests
Docs missing or thin: contributing, changelog

Most complex functions:

timeAgoSinceDate in TSWeChat/Helpers/NSDate+Extension.swift: complexity 19, 60 lines

Security

Security posture is weak: 1 possible secret(s) in the tree, 1 only in history. Weakest area: posture.

Area	Score
Secrets (gitleaks, tree + history)	49
Static analysis (Opengrep)	100
Vulnerable dependencies (OSV)	n/a
CI workflows (zizmor)	n/a
Posture (policy, updates, signing, lockfiles)	0
OpenSSF Scorecard	n/a

Posture checks passed: lockfiles; missing: security policy, dependency updates, signed commits

Top findings

Severity	Finding	Location
high	`gitleaks/square-access-token`: Possible square-access-token secret in the current tree	Pods/Pods.xcodeproj/project.pbxproj:779
medium	`gitleaks/square-access-token`: Possible square-access-token secret in history (commit f73704814f); removed from the current tree but still retrievable	Pods/Pods.xcodeproj/xcshareddata/xcschemes/Alamofire.xcscheme:17
low	`gitleaks/generic-api-key`: Possible generic-api-key secret in the current tree	Pods/Manifest.lock:96
low	`gitleaks/generic-api-key`: Possible generic-api-key secret in the current tree	Podfile.lock:96
low	`gitleaks/generic-api-key`: Possible generic-api-key secret in the current tree	Scripts/apns.php:5
low	`gitleaks/generic-api-key`: Possible generic-api-key secret in the current tree	TSWeChat/Resources/JSON/chat.json:52

Static signals only: the scorer never runs the project's code. Secret findings are pattern matches that were not verified, and secret values are never stored.

Repository profile

Source lines: 8,675; test lines: 0

Language	Lines
Swift	8,468
Shell	129
PHP	66
C	12