Leaderboard github.com
lalitmee/codecompanion-spinners.nvim
Beautiful, configurable status spinners for codecompanion.nvim
AI provenance
0%
possible
- Confidence
- 55%
- Coverage
- 100%
Estimated share of AI-generated code. Explicit attribution is a lower bound.
Code quality
73/100
adequate
- Confidence
- 90%
- Coverage
- 100%
Complexity, duplication, lint density, tests, CI, docs and review process.
Security
53/100
weak
- Confidence
- 85%
- Coverage
- 100%
Secrets, static analysis, vulnerable dependencies, CI and supply-chain posture.
AI provenance
0% possible
Weak signals consistent with AI-assisted development.
How the score is built
- Explicitly attributed share0%
- Unattributed share in AI-pace bursts44%
- Estimated AI-generated share0%
- AI tool configuration files1
- Work sessions at AI pace1
- Releases at AI pace0
- Coding-style index (1.0+ means possible)0.00
Lines added per month all AI-attributed share
- 2025-095,360 · 0% AI
- 2025-10119 · 0% AI
- 2026-063 · 0% AI
Evidence by analyzer
Explicit AI attributionok
- attributed_commit_share
- 0.0%
- attributed_commits
- 0
- attributed_loc
- 0
- attributed_loc_share
- 0.0%
- commits
- 59
- effective_loc
- 5,482
- tools_detected
- 0
AI tool configurationok1 item
- artifacts
- 1
- earliest_adoption
- 2025-09-13
- tools_configured
- 1
- workflow_agents
- 0
Commit velocityok1 item
- excluded_import_loc
- 0
- flagged_loc
- 2,406
- flagged_loc_share
- 43.9%
- flagged_units
- 1
- max_loc_per_hour
- 709.91
- measured_loc
- 5,482
- median_loc_per_hour
- 241.50
- pr_timed_units
- 0
- pre_ai_era_burst_loc
- 0
- pre_ai_era_bursts
- 0
- pre_ai_era_measured_loc
- 0
- work_units
- 9
Release velocityok
- flagged_releases
- 0
- max_loc_per_day
- 4.30
- releases
- 1
Coding styleok
- count:assistant_voice
- 0
- count:emoji_in_code
- 0
- count:narrated_steps
- 0
- count:placeholder
- 0
- files:assistant_voice
- 0
- files:emoji_in_code
- 0
- files:narrated_steps
- 0
- files:placeholder
- 0
- index
- 0
- lines_scanned
- 1,352
- per_kloc:assistant_voice
- 0
- per_kloc:emoji_in_code
- 0
- per_kloc:narrated_steps
- 0
- per_kloc:placeholder
- 0
Code quality
73 adequate
Code quality is adequate: test-to-source ratio 1.66, CI runs tests; 5% of function code in complex or long functions; 23% duplicated lines. Weakest area: duplication.
How the score is built
- Complexity86
- Duplication25
- Lint and smellsnot measured
- Tests and CI89
- Documentation80
- Type safetynot measured
- Review processnot measured
Evidence by analyzer
Complexity (lizard)ok1 item
- complex_functions
- 1
- function_nloc
- 843
- functions
- 62
- long_functions
- 0
- many_param_functions
- 0
- mean_ccn
- 3.53
- p90_ccn
- 9
- risky_nloc_share
- 5.1%
Duplication (jscpd)ok2 items
- 6+ duplicated lines: lua/codecompanion/_extensions/spinner/styles/heirline.lua:4 and lua/codecompanion/_extensions/spinner/styles/lualine.lua:4
- 6+ duplicated lines: lua/codecompanion/_extensions/spinner/styles/noice.lua:3 and lua/codecompanion/_extensions/spinner/styles/snacks.lua:3
- compared_lines
- 1,009
- duplicated_lines
- 234
- duplicated_share
- 23.2%
- files
- 10
Lintskipped
Tests and CIok6 items
- CI config: .github/workflows/docs.yml
.github/workflows/docs.yml - CI config: .github/workflows/lint.yml
.github/workflows/lint.yml - CI config: .github/workflows/release-drafter.yml
.github/workflows/release-drafter.yml - CI config: .github/workflows/stale.yml
.github/workflows/stale.yml - CI config: .github/workflows/test.yml
.github/workflows/test.yml - CI runs tests (make test)
- check:ci_present
- yes
- check:ci_runs_lint
- no
- check:ci_runs_tests
- yes
- check:has_tests
- yes
- check:test_ratio
- yes
- check:tests_cochange
- no
- ci_files
- 5
- cochange_commits
- 17
- cochange_share
- 23.5%
- source_lines
- 1,352
- test_lines
- 2,249
- test_ratio
- 1.66
Documentationok3 items
- README.md
README.md - LICENSE
LICENSE - CONTRIBUTING.md
CONTRIBUTING.md
- check:changelog
- no
- check:contributing
- yes
- check:license
- yes
- check:readme
- yes
- readme_lines
- 365
Type safetyskipped
Security
53 weak
Security posture is weak: 11 high-severity workflow issues. Weakest area: posture.
How the score is built
- Secrets100
- Static analysis (SAST)not measured
- Vulnerable dependenciesnot measured
- CI workflows8
- Security posture0
- OpenSSF Scorecardnot measured
Evidence by analyzer
OpenSSF Scorecardskipped
no published OpenSSF Scorecard result for this repo
Package registriesskipped
no registry dependencies declared
Secrets (gitleaks)ok
- secrets_current
- 0
- secrets_history
- 0
- secrets_low_confidence
- 0
- secrets_nonprod
- 0
Static analysis (opengrep)skipped
Dependencies (osv-scanner)skipped
CI workflows (zizmor)ok
- findings
- 19
- findings_high
- 11
- findings_low
- 0
- findings_medium
- 8
- penalty
- 147.60
- workflows
- 5
Security postureok
- check:dependency_updates
- no
- check:lockfiles
- yes
- check:security_policy
- no
- check:signed_commits
- no
- signed_commit_share
- 1.7%
- unpinned_manifests
- 0
Release downloadsok
- binary_assets
- 0
- signals
- 0
- suspicious
- 0
Findings
11 high8 medium
19 findings
| Severity | Rule | Location | Message | Tool |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| high | zizmor/unpinned-uses |
.github/workflows/docs.yml:21 | unpinned action reference [confidence high] | CI workflows (zizmor) |
| high | zizmor/unpinned-uses |
.github/workflows/lint.yml:13 | unpinned action reference [confidence high] | CI workflows (zizmor) |
| high | zizmor/unpinned-uses |
.github/workflows/lint.yml:16 | unpinned action reference [confidence high] | CI workflows (zizmor) |
| high | zizmor/unpinned-uses |
.github/workflows/lint.yml:21 | unpinned action reference [confidence high] | CI workflows (zizmor) |
| high | zizmor/unpinned-uses |
.github/workflows/lint.yml:24 | unpinned action reference [confidence high] | CI workflows (zizmor) |
| high | zizmor/unpinned-uses |
.github/workflows/release-drafter.yml:12 | unpinned action reference [confidence high] | CI workflows (zizmor) |
| high | zizmor/unpinned-uses |
.github/workflows/stale.yml:11 | unpinned action reference [confidence high] | CI workflows (zizmor) |
| high | zizmor/unpinned-uses |
.github/workflows/test.yml:18 | unpinned action reference [confidence high] | CI workflows (zizmor) |
| high | zizmor/unpinned-uses |
.github/workflows/test.yml:21 | unpinned action reference [confidence high] | CI workflows (zizmor) |
| high | zizmor/unpinned-uses |
.github/workflows/test.yml:27 | unpinned action reference [confidence high] | CI workflows (zizmor) |
| high | zizmor/unpinned-uses |
.github/workflows/test.yml:32 | unpinned action reference [confidence high] | CI workflows (zizmor) |
| medium | zizmor/excessive-permissions |
.github/workflows/docs.yml:18 | overly broad permissions [confidence medium] | CI workflows (zizmor) |
| medium | zizmor/artipacked |
.github/workflows/docs.yml:21 | credential persistence through GitHub Actions artifacts [confidence low] | CI workflows (zizmor) |
| medium | zizmor/excessive-permissions |
.github/workflows/lint.yml:10 | overly broad permissions [confidence medium] | CI workflows (zizmor) |
| medium | zizmor/artipacked |
.github/workflows/lint.yml:13 | credential persistence through GitHub Actions artifacts [confidence low] | CI workflows (zizmor) |
| medium | zizmor/excessive-permissions |
.github/workflows/release-drafter.yml:9 | overly broad permissions [confidence medium] | CI workflows (zizmor) |
| medium | zizmor/excessive-permissions |
.github/workflows/stale.yml:8 | overly broad permissions [confidence medium] | CI workflows (zizmor) |
| medium | zizmor/excessive-permissions |
.github/workflows/test.yml:10 | overly broad permissions [confidence medium] | CI workflows (zizmor) |
| medium | zizmor/artipacked |
.github/workflows/test.yml:18 | credential persistence through GitHub Actions artifacts [confidence low] | CI workflows (zizmor) |
Tools and coverage
Every analyzer that ran on this commit. A failed or skipped tool is a coverage gap: its share of the score is left out and the coverage figure drops.
| Analyzer | Pillar | Status | Version | Findings | Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI tool configuration | AI provenance | ok | signatures-v1 | 0 | |
| Explicit AI attribution | AI provenance | ok | signatures-v1 | 0 | |
| Release velocity | AI provenance | ok | prov-4 | 0 | |
| Coding style | AI provenance | ok | — | 0 | |
| Commit velocity | AI provenance | ok | prov-4 | 0 | |
| Complexity (lizard) | Code quality | ok | lizard 1.25.1 | 0 | |
| Documentation | Code quality | ok | — | 0 | |
| Duplication (jscpd) | Code quality | ok | repotrust-dup-w6 | 0 | |
| Lint | Code quality | skipped | — | 0 | |
| Tests and CI | Code quality | ok | — | 0 | |
| Type safety | Code quality | skipped | — | 0 | |
| CI workflows (zizmor) | Security | ok | zizmor 1.32.0 | 19 | |
| Dependencies (osv-scanner) | Security | skipped | — | 0 | |
| Release downloads | Security | ok | — | 0 | |
| Security posture | Security | ok | — | 0 | |
| Package registries | Security | skipped | — | 0 | no registry dependencies declared |
| Static analysis (opengrep) | Security | skipped | — | 0 | |
| OpenSSF Scorecard | Security | skipped | — | 0 | no published OpenSSF Scorecard result for this repo |
| Secrets (gitleaks) | Security | ok | gitleaks 8.30.1 | 0 |
Score history
Scores from different scoring versions aren't directly comparable.
| Scored | Commit | Scoring | AI provenance | Quality | Security |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-11-14 | f613a543ca8c | prov-5+qual-2+sec-2 | 0% | 73 | 53 |
| 2026-11-14 | f613a543ca8c | prov-4+qual-2+sec-2 | 0% | 73 | 53 |
Full text report
- Repository: https://github.com/lalitmee/codecompanion-spinners.nvim
- Commit:
f613a543ca8c7ba1686830c6bb1a10d15a2e1942 - Generated: 2026-11-14T14:52:05+00:00
- Scorer 0.1.0, scoring prov-5+qual-2+sec-2, report schema v2
Scores
| Pillar | Score | Signal | Confidence | Coverage |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI provenance (estimated AI-generated share) | 0 | possible | 55% | 100% |
| Code quality | 73 | adequate | 90% | 100% |
| Security | 53 | weak | 85% | 100% |
AI provenance
Weak signals consistent with AI-assisted development.
-
Explicitly attributed share (lower bound): 0.0%
-
Unattributed share in AI-consistent velocity bursts: 43.9%
-
Estimated AI-generated share: 0.0%
-
AI tooling configured in repo: gemini
| Month | Lines added | Attributed to AI |
|---|---|---|
| 2025-09 | 5,360 | 0% |
| 2025-10 | 119 | 0% |
| 2026-06 | 3 | 0% |
Evidence
- GEMINI.md (gemini configuration) (GEMINI.md)
- 2,406 lines of first-party code in ~3.4h (710 lines/hour, 1 commit session) (aee488f419c6)
AI provenance describes how code was produced; it is not a quality judgment. Unless attribution is explicit, these are signals consistent with AI generation, not proof. Squash/rebase workflows, imported code, and rewritten history reduce accuracy.
Code quality
Code quality is adequate: test-to-source ratio 1.66, CI runs tests; 5% of function code in complex or long functions; 23% duplicated lines. Weakest area: duplication.
| Area | Score |
|---|---|
| Complexity (lizard) | 86 |
| Duplication | 25 |
| Code smells (Opengrep) | n/a |
| Tests and CI | 89 |
| Documentation | 80 |
| Type safety | n/a |
| Process (Scorecard review/maintenance) | n/a |
- Functions: 62; mean complexity 3.5, 90th percentile 9; 1 complex and 0 long functions
- Duplicated lines: 23.2% of 1,009 compared
- Tests: 2,249 test lines for 1,352 source lines (ratio 1.66); CI test commands: make test; 24% of recent source commits also change tests
- Docs missing or thin: changelog
Most complex functions:
Security
Security posture is weak: 11 high-severity workflow issues. Weakest area: posture.
| Area | Score |
|---|---|
| Secrets (gitleaks, tree + history) | 100 |
| Static analysis (Opengrep) | n/a |
| Vulnerable dependencies (OSV) | n/a |
| CI workflows (zizmor) | 8 |
| Posture (policy, updates, signing, lockfiles) | 0 |
| OpenSSF Scorecard | n/a |
- Posture checks passed: lockfiles; missing: security policy, dependency updates, signed commits
Top findings
| Severity | Finding | Location |
|---|---|---|
| high | zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] |
.github/workflows/docs.yml:21 |
| high | zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] |
.github/workflows/lint.yml:13 |
| high | zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] |
.github/workflows/lint.yml:16 |
| high | zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] |
.github/workflows/lint.yml:21 |
| high | zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] |
.github/workflows/lint.yml:24 |
| high | zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] |
.github/workflows/release-drafter.yml:12 |
| high | zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] |
.github/workflows/stale.yml:11 |
| high | zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] |
.github/workflows/test.yml:18 |
| high | zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] |
.github/workflows/test.yml:21 |
| high | zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] |
.github/workflows/test.yml:27 |
| high | zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] |
.github/workflows/test.yml:32 |
| medium | zizmor/artipacked: credential persistence through GitHub Actions artifacts [confidence low] |
.github/workflows/docs.yml:21 |
| medium | zizmor/excessive-permissions: overly broad permissions [confidence medium] |
.github/workflows/docs.yml:18 |
| medium | zizmor/artipacked: credential persistence through GitHub Actions artifacts [confidence low] |
.github/workflows/lint.yml:13 |
| medium | zizmor/excessive-permissions: overly broad permissions [confidence medium] |
.github/workflows/lint.yml:10 |
| medium | zizmor/excessive-permissions: overly broad permissions [confidence medium] |
.github/workflows/release-drafter.yml:9 |
| medium | zizmor/excessive-permissions: overly broad permissions [confidence medium] |
.github/workflows/stale.yml:8 |
| medium | zizmor/artipacked: credential persistence through GitHub Actions artifacts [confidence low] |
.github/workflows/test.yml:18 |
| medium | zizmor/excessive-permissions: overly broad permissions [confidence medium] |
.github/workflows/test.yml:10 |
Static signals only: the scorer never runs the project's code. Secret findings are pattern matches that were not verified, and secret values are never stored.
Repository profile
- Source lines: 1,352; test lines: 2,249
| Language | Lines |
|---|---|
| Lua | 3,601 |