Leaderboard github.com
jmcarp/robobrowser
AI provenance
0%
none-detected
- Confidence
- 63%
- Coverage
- 100%
Estimated share of AI-generated code. Explicit attribution is a lower bound.
Code quality
69/100
adequate
- Confidence
- 90%
- Coverage
- 100%
Complexity, duplication, lint density, tests, CI, docs and review process.
Security
73/100
adequate
- Confidence
- 85%
- Coverage
- 100%
Secrets, static analysis, vulnerable dependencies, CI and supply-chain posture.
AI provenance
0% none-detected
No AI attribution or AI-consistent velocity signals detected.
How the score is built
- Explicitly attributed share0%
- Unattributed share in AI-pace bursts0%
- Estimated AI-generated share0%
- AI tool configuration files0
- Work sessions at AI pace0
- Releases at AI pace0
- Coding-style index (1.0+ means possible)0.00
Lines added per month all AI-attributed share
- 2014-022,414 · 0% AI
- 2014-03272 · 0% AI
- 2014-05252 · 0% AI
- 2014-07778 · 0% AI
- 2014-0930 · 0% AI
- 2014-121 · 0% AI
- 2015-010 · 0% AI
- 2015-0465 · 0% AI
- 2015-05158 · 0% AI
- 2015-0628 · 0% AI
Evidence by analyzer
Explicit AI attributionok
- attributed_commit_share
- 0.0%
- attributed_commits
- 0
- attributed_loc
- 0
- attributed_loc_share
- 0.0%
- commits
- 93
- effective_loc
- 3,998
- tools_detected
- 0
AI tool configurationok
- artifacts
- 0
- tools_configured
- 0
- workflow_agents
- 0
Commit velocityok
- excluded_import_loc
- 0
- flagged_loc
- 0
- flagged_loc_share
- 0.0%
- flagged_units
- 0
- max_loc_per_hour
- 361.62
- measured_loc
- 3,728
- median_loc_per_hour
- 60.21
- pr_timed_units
- 0
- pre_ai_era_burst_loc
- 0
- pre_ai_era_bursts
- 0
- pre_ai_era_measured_loc
- 3,728
- work_units
- 40
Release velocityok
- flagged_releases
- 0
- max_loc_per_day
- 104.90
- releases
- 5
Coding styleok
- count:assistant_voice
- 0
- count:emoji_in_code
- 0
- count:narrated_steps
- 0
- count:placeholder
- 0
- files:assistant_voice
- 0
- files:emoji_in_code
- 0
- files:narrated_steps
- 0
- files:placeholder
- 0
- index
- 0
- lines_scanned
- 1,528
- per_kloc:assistant_voice
- 0
- per_kloc:emoji_in_code
- 0
- per_kloc:narrated_steps
- 0
- per_kloc:placeholder
- 0
Code quality
69 adequate
Code quality is adequate: test-to-source ratio 0.87, no CI test run detected; 0% of function code in complex or long functions; 0% duplicated lines. Weakest area: process.
How the score is built
- Complexity100
- Duplication100
- Lint and smells12
- Tests and CI80
- Documentation100
- Type safety40
- Review process5
Evidence by analyzer
Complexity (lizard)ok
- complex_functions
- 0
- function_nloc
- 675
- functions
- 115
- long_functions
- 0
- many_param_functions
- 2
- mean_ccn
- 2.21
- p90_ccn
- 4
- risky_nloc_share
- 0.0%
Duplication (jscpd)ok
- compared_lines
- 1,062
- duplicated_lines
- 0
- duplicated_share
- 0.0%
- files
- 13
Lintok
- category:best-practice
- 3
- category:correctness
- 2
- category:maintainability
- 6
- findings
- 11
- scanned_lines
- 1,528
- weighted_findings
- 13
Tests and CIok2 items
- CI config: .travis.yml
.travis.yml - CI runs linters (flake8)
- check:ci_present
- yes
- check:ci_runs_lint
- yes
- check:ci_runs_tests
- no
- check:has_tests
- yes
- check:test_ratio
- yes
- check:tests_cochange
- yes
- ci_files
- 1
- cochange_commits
- 60
- cochange_share
- 40.0%
- source_lines
- 1,528
- test_lines
- 1,327
- test_ratio
- 0.87
Documentationok4 items
- README.rst
README.rst - LICENSE
LICENSE - docs/contributing.rst
docs/contributing.rst - HISTORY.rst
HISTORY.rst
- check:changelog
- yes
- check:contributing
- yes
- check:license
- yes
- check:readme
- yes
- readme_lines
- 125
Type safetyok
- check:low_escape_density
- yes
- check:strict_config
- no
- escapes
- 0
- escapes_per_kloc
- 0
Security
73 adequate
Security posture is adequate: no high-impact findings. Weakest area: posture.
How the score is built
- Secrets100
- Static analysis (SAST)100
- Vulnerable dependenciesnot measured
- CI workflowsnot measured
- Security posture0
- OpenSSF Scorecard25
Evidence by analyzer
OpenSSF Scorecardok9 items
- Scorecard Binary-Artifacts: 10/10 (no binaries found in the repo)
- Scorecard Code-Review: 1/10 (Found 5/27 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1)
- Scorecard Maintained: 0/10 (0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0)
- Scorecard CII-Best-Practices: 0/10 (no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected)
- Scorecard Fuzzing: 0/10 (project is not fuzzed)
- Scorecard Security-Policy: 0/10 (security policy file not detected)
- Scorecard License: 10/10 (license file detected)
- Scorecard Branch-Protection: 0/10 (branch protection not enabled on development/release branches)
- Scorecard SAST: 0/10 (SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0)
- aggregate
- 2.10
- check:Binary-Artifacts
- yes
- check:Branch-Protection
- no
- check:CII-Best-Practices
- no
- check:Code-Review
- yes
- check:Fuzzing
- no
- check:License
- yes
- check:Maintained
- no
- check:SAST
- no
- check:Security-Policy
- no
Package registriesskipped
no registry dependencies declared
Secrets (gitleaks)ok
- secrets_current
- 0
- secrets_history
- 0
- secrets_low_confidence
- 0
- secrets_nonprod
- 0
Static analysis (opengrep)ok
- findings
- 0
- findings_high
- 0
- findings_low
- 0
- findings_medium
- 0
- parse_errors
- 0
- scanned_lines
- 1,528
- weighted_findings
- 0
Dependencies (osv-scanner)skipped
CI workflows (zizmor)skipped
Security postureok
- check:dependency_updates
- no
- check:lockfiles
- yes
- check:security_policy
- no
- check:signed_commits
- no
- signed_commit_share
- 0.0%
- unpinned_manifests
- 0
Release downloadsok
- binary_assets
- 0
- signals
- 0
- suspicious
- 0
Findings
1 high10 medium
11 findings
| Severity | Rule | Location | Message | Tool |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| high | opengrep/python.lang.best-practice.open-never-closed |
robobrowser/forms/fields.py:67 | file object opened without corresponding close | Lint |
| medium | opengrep/python.lang.maintainability.return-not-in-function |
robobrowser/compat.py:19 | `return` only makes sense inside a function | Lint |
| medium | opengrep/python.lang.maintainability.return-not-in-function |
robobrowser/compat.py:20 | `return` only makes sense inside a function | Lint |
| medium | opengrep/python.lang.maintainability.return-not-in-function |
robobrowser/compat.py:21 | `return` only makes sense inside a function | Lint |
| medium | opengrep/python.lang.maintainability.return-not-in-function |
robobrowser/compat.py:29 | `return` only makes sense inside a function | Lint |
| medium | opengrep/python.lang.maintainability.return-not-in-function |
robobrowser/compat.py:30 | `return` only makes sense inside a function | Lint |
| medium | opengrep/python.lang.maintainability.return-not-in-function |
robobrowser/compat.py:31 | `return` only makes sense inside a function | Lint |
| medium | opengrep/python.lang.correctness.baseclass-attribute-override |
robobrowser/forms/fields.py:203 | Class Radio inherits from both `FlatOptionField` and `MultiOptionField` which both have a method named `$F`; one of these methods will be overwritten. | Lint |
| medium | opengrep/python.lang.correctness.baseclass-attribute-override |
robobrowser/forms/fields.py:207 | Class Select inherits from both `NestedOptionField` and `MultiOptionField` which both have a method named `$F`; one of these methods will be overwritten. | Lint |
| medium | opengrep/python.lang.best-practice.unspecified-open-encoding |
robobrowser/forms/fields.py:67 | Missing 'encoding' parameter. 'open()' uses device locale encodings by default, corrupting files with special characters. Specify the encoding to ensure cross-platform support when opening files in text mode (e.g. encoding="utf-8"). | Lint |
| medium | opengrep/python.lang.best-practice.unspecified-open-encoding |
setup.py:38 | Missing 'encoding' parameter. 'open()' uses device locale encodings by default, corrupting files with special characters. Specify the encoding to ensure cross-platform support when opening files in text mode (e.g. encoding="utf-8"). | Lint |
Tools and coverage
Every analyzer that ran on this commit. A failed or skipped tool is a coverage gap: its share of the score is left out and the coverage figure drops.
| Analyzer | Pillar | Status | Version | Findings | Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI tool configuration | AI provenance | ok | signatures-v1 | 0 | |
| Explicit AI attribution | AI provenance | ok | signatures-v1 | 0 | |
| Release velocity | AI provenance | ok | prov-4 | 0 | |
| Coding style | AI provenance | ok | — | 0 | |
| Commit velocity | AI provenance | ok | prov-4 | 0 | |
| Complexity (lizard) | Code quality | ok | lizard 1.25.1 | 0 | |
| Documentation | Code quality | ok | — | 0 | |
| Duplication (jscpd) | Code quality | ok | repotrust-dup-w6 | 0 | |
| Lint | Code quality | ok | opengrep 1.33.1; rules f1d2b562b414 | 11 | |
| Tests and CI | Code quality | ok | — | 0 | |
| Type safety | Code quality | ok | — | 0 | |
| CI workflows (zizmor) | Security | skipped | — | 0 | |
| Dependencies (osv-scanner) | Security | skipped | — | 0 | |
| Release downloads | Security | ok | — | 0 | |
| Security posture | Security | ok | — | 0 | |
| Package registries | Security | skipped | — | 0 | no registry dependencies declared |
| Static analysis (opengrep) | Security | ok | opengrep 1.33.1; rules f1d2b562b414 | 0 | |
| OpenSSF Scorecard | Security | ok | scorecard v5.6.0 | 0 | |
| Secrets (gitleaks) | Security | ok | gitleaks 8.30.1 | 0 |
Score history
Scores from different scoring versions aren't directly comparable.
| Scored | Commit | Scoring | AI provenance | Quality | Security |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-11-14 | 4284c11d00ae | prov-5+qual-2+sec-2 | 0% | 69 | 73 |
| 2026-11-14 | 4284c11d00ae | prov-4+qual-2+sec-2 | 0% | 69 | 73 |
Full text report
- Repository: https://github.com/jmcarp/robobrowser
- Commit:
4284c11d00ae1397983e269aa180e5cf7ee5f4cf - Generated: 2026-11-14T14:52:05+00:00
- Scorer 0.1.0, scoring prov-5+qual-2+sec-2, report schema v2
Scores
| Pillar | Score | Signal | Confidence | Coverage |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI provenance (estimated AI-generated share) | 0 | none-detected | 63% | 100% |
| Code quality | 69 | adequate | 90% | 100% |
| Security | 73 | adequate | 85% | 100% |
AI provenance
No AI attribution or AI-consistent velocity signals detected.
- Explicitly attributed share (lower bound): 0.0%
- Unattributed share in AI-consistent velocity bursts: 0.0%
- Estimated AI-generated share: 0.0%
| Month | Lines added | Attributed to AI |
|---|---|---|
| 2014-02 | 2,414 | 0% |
| 2014-03 | 272 | 0% |
| 2014-05 | 252 | 0% |
| 2014-07 | 778 | 0% |
| 2014-09 | 30 | 0% |
| 2014-12 | 1 | 0% |
| 2015-04 | 65 | 0% |
| 2015-05 | 158 | 0% |
| 2015-06 | 28 | 0% |
AI provenance describes how code was produced; it is not a quality judgment. Unless attribution is explicit, these are signals consistent with AI generation, not proof. Squash/rebase workflows, imported code, and rewritten history reduce accuracy.
Code quality
Code quality is adequate: test-to-source ratio 0.87, no CI test run detected; 0% of function code in complex or long functions; 0% duplicated lines. Weakest area: process.
| Area | Score |
|---|---|
| Complexity (lizard) | 100 |
| Duplication | 100 |
| Code smells (Opengrep) | 12 |
| Tests and CI | 80 |
| Documentation | 100 |
| Type safety | 40 |
| Process (Scorecard review/maintenance) | 5 |
- Functions: 115; mean complexity 2.2, 90th percentile 4; 0 complex and 0 long functions
- Duplicated lines: 0.0% of 1,062 compared
- Tests: 1,327 test lines for 1,528 source lines (ratio 0.87); CI test commands: none detected; 40% of recent source commits also change tests
- Docs missing or thin: none
Security
Security posture is adequate: no high-impact findings. Weakest area: posture.
| Area | Score |
|---|---|
| Secrets (gitleaks, tree + history) | 100 |
| Static analysis (Opengrep) | 100 |
| Vulnerable dependencies (OSV) | n/a |
| CI workflows (zizmor) | n/a |
| Posture (policy, updates, signing, lockfiles) | 0 |
| OpenSSF Scorecard | 25 |
- Posture checks passed: lockfiles; missing: security policy, dependency updates, signed commits
- OpenSSF Scorecard aggregate: 2.1/10 (published 2026-11-02)
Static signals only: the scorer never runs the project's code. Secret findings are pattern matches that were not verified, and secret values are never stored.
Repository profile
- Source lines: 1,528; test lines: 1,327
| Language | Lines |
|---|---|
| Python | 2,855 |