Leaderboard github.com
jehan593/arch-config
Personal Arch Linux (Cinnamon) system setup: dotfiles, install/reset scripts, and CLI tools for WireGuard, tunnels, and more
AI provenance
<1%
explicit
- Confidence
- 79%
- Coverage
- 100%
Estimated share of AI-generated code. Explicit attribution is a lower bound.
Code quality
58/100
weak
- Confidence
- 90%
- Coverage
- 100%
Complexity, duplication, lint density, tests, CI, docs and review process.
Security
82/100
adequate
- Confidence
- 85%
- Coverage
- 100%
Secrets, static analysis, vulnerable dependencies, CI and supply-chain posture.
AI provenance
0% explicit
Explicit AI attribution on 0% of first-party code added; an estimated 0% including velocity signals.
How the score is built
- Explicitly attributed share0%
- Unattributed share in AI-pace bursts0%
- Estimated AI-generated share0%
- AI tool configuration files1
- Work sessions at AI pace0
- Releases at AI pacenot measured
- Coding-style index (1.0+ means possible)0.00
Attributed AI tools
| Tool | Commits | Lines added | First seen | Last seen |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Code | 4 | 11 | 2026-07-20 | 2026-07-29 |
Lines added per month all AI-attributed share
- 2026-072,225 · 0% AI
- 2026-08277 · 0% AI
- 2026-0929 · 0% AI
- 2026-1094 · 0% AI
- 2026-117 · 0% AI
Findings in AI-attributed lines vs the rest
From git blame: 11 lines trace to AI-attributed commits, 2,001 to others. Too few lines in one group for a fair comparison. Reported, not scored.
| Findings per 1,000 lines | AI-attributed | Other | Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|
| Code quality | 0.00 | 3.00 | — |
| Security | 0.00 | 0.00 | — |
Evidence by analyzer
Explicit AI attributionok5 items
- Claude Code: 4 attributed commits, 11 lines added
- Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude'
- Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude'
- Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude'
- Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude'
- attributed_commit_share
- 11.4%
- attributed_commits
- 4
- attributed_loc
- 11
- attributed_loc_share
- 0.4%
- commits
- 35
- effective_loc
- 2,632
- tools_detected
- 1
AI tool configurationok1 item
- artifacts
- 1
- earliest_adoption
- 2026-07-29
- tools_configured
- 1
- workflow_agents
- 0
Commit velocityok
- excluded_import_loc
- 0
- flagged_loc
- 0
- flagged_loc_share
- 0.0%
- flagged_units
- 0
- max_loc_per_hour
- 410.75
- measured_loc
- 2,632
- median_loc_per_hour
- 276.75
- pr_timed_units
- 0
- pre_ai_era_burst_loc
- 0
- pre_ai_era_bursts
- 0
- pre_ai_era_measured_loc
- 0
- work_units
- 14
Release velocityskipped
Coding styleok
- count:assistant_voice
- 0
- count:emoji_in_code
- 0
- count:narrated_steps
- 0
- count:placeholder
- 0
- files:assistant_voice
- 0
- files:emoji_in_code
- 0
- files:narrated_steps
- 0
- files:placeholder
- 0
- index
- 0
- lines_scanned
- 2,012
- per_kloc:assistant_voice
- 0
- per_kloc:emoji_in_code
- 0
- per_kloc:narrated_steps
- 0
- per_kloc:placeholder
- 0
Findings in AI-written linesok
- ai_lines
- 11
- blame_failures
- 0
- files_blamed
- 18
- other_lines
- 2,001
- quality:ai_findings
- 0
- quality:ai_per_kloc
- 0
- quality:other_findings
- 6
- quality:other_per_kloc
- 3.00
- security:ai_findings
- 0
- security:ai_per_kloc
- 0
- security:other_findings
- 0
- security:other_per_kloc
- 0
Code quality
58 weak
Code quality is weak: test-to-source ratio 0.00, no CI test run detected; 0% of function code in complex or long functions; 2% duplicated lines. Weakest area: testing.
How the score is built
- Complexity100
- Duplication89
- Lint and smells82
- Tests and CI0
- Documentation40
- Type safetynot measured
- Review processnot measured
Evidence by analyzer
Complexity (lizard)ok
- complex_functions
- 0
- function_nloc
- 68
- functions
- 8
- long_functions
- 0
- many_param_functions
- 0
- mean_ccn
- 2.62
- p90_ccn
- 6
- risky_nloc_share
- 0.0%
Duplication (jscpd)ok1 item
- compared_lines
- 1,489
- duplicated_lines
- 28
- duplicated_share
- 1.9%
- files
- 18
Lintok
- category:correctness
- 6
- findings
- 6
- scanned_lines
- 1,853
- weighted_findings
- 1.50
Tests and CIok
- check:ci_present
- no
- check:ci_runs_lint
- no
- check:ci_runs_tests
- no
- check:has_tests
- no
- check:test_ratio
- no
- check:tests_cochange
- no
- ci_files
- 0
- cochange_commits
- 16
- cochange_share
- 0.0%
- source_lines
- 2,012
- test_lines
- 0
- test_ratio
- 0
Documentationok1 item
- README.md
README.md
- check:changelog
- no
- check:contributing
- no
- check:license
- no
- check:readme
- yes
- readme_lines
- 90
Type safetyskipped
Security
82 adequate
Security posture is adequate: no high-impact findings. Weakest area: posture.
How the score is built
- Secrets100
- Static analysis (SAST)100
- Vulnerable dependenciesnot measured
- CI workflowsnot measured
- Security posture0
- OpenSSF Scorecardnot measured
Evidence by analyzer
OpenSSF Scorecardskipped
no published OpenSSF Scorecard result for this repo
Package registriesskipped
no registry dependencies declared
Secrets (gitleaks)ok
- secrets_current
- 0
- secrets_history
- 0
- secrets_low_confidence
- 0
- secrets_nonprod
- 0
Static analysis (opengrep)ok
- findings
- 0
- findings_high
- 0
- findings_low
- 0
- findings_medium
- 0
- parse_errors
- 2
- scanned_lines
- 1,853
- weighted_findings
- 0
Dependencies (osv-scanner)skipped
CI workflows (zizmor)skipped
Security postureok
- check:dependency_updates
- no
- check:lockfiles
- yes
- check:security_policy
- no
- check:signed_commits
- no
- signed_commit_share
- 0.0%
- unpinned_manifests
- 0
Release downloadsok
- binary_assets
- 0
- signals
- 0
- suspicious
- 0
Findings
6 low
6 findings
| Severity | Rule | Location | Message | Tool |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| low | opengrep/bash.lang.correctness.unquoted-variable-expansion-in-command |
tools/timer.sh:137 | Variable expansions must be double-quoted so as to prevent being split into multiple pieces according to whitespace or whichever separator is specified by the IFS variable. If you really wish to split the variable's contents, you may... | Lint |
| low | opengrep/bash.lang.correctness.unquoted-variable-expansion-in-command |
tools/timer.sh:147 | Variable expansions must be double-quoted so as to prevent being split into multiple pieces according to whitespace or whichever separator is specified by the IFS variable. If you really wish to split the variable's contents, you may... | Lint |
| low | opengrep/bash.lang.correctness.unquoted-variable-expansion-in-command |
tools/timer.sh:149 | Variable expansions must be double-quoted so as to prevent being split into multiple pieces according to whitespace or whichever separator is specified by the IFS variable. If you really wish to split the variable's contents, you may... | Lint |
| low | opengrep/bash.lang.correctness.unquoted-command-substitution-in-command |
tools/timer.sh:240 | The result of command substitution $(...) or `...`, if unquoted, is split on whitespace or other separators specified by the IFS variable. You should surround it with double quotes to avoid splitting the result. | Lint |
| low | opengrep/bash.lang.correctness.unquoted-variable-expansion-in-command |
tools/timer.sh:386 | Variable expansions must be double-quoted so as to prevent being split into multiple pieces according to whitespace or whichever separator is specified by the IFS variable. If you really wish to split the variable's contents, you may... | Lint |
| low | opengrep/bash.lang.correctness.unquoted-variable-expansion-in-command |
tools/timer.sh:390 | Variable expansions must be double-quoted so as to prevent being split into multiple pieces according to whitespace or whichever separator is specified by the IFS variable. If you really wish to split the variable's contents, you may... | Lint |
Tools and coverage
Every analyzer that ran on this commit. A failed or skipped tool is a coverage gap: its share of the score is left out and the coverage figure drops.
| Analyzer | Pillar | Status | Version | Findings | Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI tool configuration | AI provenance | ok | signatures-v1 | 0 | |
| Explicit AI attribution | AI provenance | ok | signatures-v1 | 0 | |
| Release velocity | AI provenance | skipped | — | 0 | |
| Coding style | AI provenance | ok | — | 0 | |
| Commit velocity | AI provenance | ok | prov-4 | 0 | |
| Findings in AI-written lines | AI provenance | ok | git-blame | 0 | |
| Complexity (lizard) | Code quality | ok | lizard 1.25.1 | 0 | |
| Documentation | Code quality | ok | — | 0 | |
| Duplication (jscpd) | Code quality | ok | repotrust-dup-w6 | 0 | |
| Lint | Code quality | ok | opengrep 1.33.1; rules f1d2b562b414 | 6 | |
| Tests and CI | Code quality | ok | — | 0 | |
| Type safety | Code quality | skipped | — | 0 | |
| CI workflows (zizmor) | Security | skipped | — | 0 | |
| Dependencies (osv-scanner) | Security | skipped | — | 0 | |
| Release downloads | Security | ok | — | 0 | |
| Security posture | Security | ok | — | 0 | |
| Package registries | Security | skipped | — | 0 | no registry dependencies declared |
| Static analysis (opengrep) | Security | ok | opengrep 1.33.1; rules f1d2b562b414 | 0 | |
| OpenSSF Scorecard | Security | skipped | — | 0 | no published OpenSSF Scorecard result for this repo |
| Secrets (gitleaks) | Security | ok | gitleaks 8.30.1 | 0 |
Score history
Scores from different scoring versions aren't directly comparable.
| Scored | Commit | Scoring | AI provenance | Quality | Security |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-11-14 | 76849836c412 | prov-5+qual-2+sec-2 | 0% | 58 | 82 |
| 2026-11-14 | 76849836c412 | prov-4+qual-2+sec-2 | 0% | 58 | 82 |
Full text report
- Repository: https://github.com/jehan593/arch-config
- Commit:
76849836c4120bf53d1f3f137071e4f244884417 - Generated: 2026-11-14T14:52:05+00:00
- Scorer 0.1.0, scoring prov-5+qual-2+sec-2, report schema v2
Scores
| Pillar | Score | Signal | Confidence | Coverage |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI provenance (estimated AI-generated share) | 0 | explicit | 79% | 100% |
| Code quality | 58 | weak | 90% | 100% |
| Security | 82 | adequate | 85% | 100% |
AI provenance
Explicit AI attribution on 0% of first-party code added; an estimated 0% including velocity signals.
- Explicitly attributed share (lower bound): 0.4%
- Unattributed share in AI-consistent velocity bursts: 0.0%
- Estimated AI-generated share: 0.4%
| AI tool | Attributed commits | Lines added |
|---|---|---|
| Claude Code | 4 | 11 |
- AI tooling configured in repo: claude-code
Current source lines last changed by AI-attributed commits: 11 of 2,012.
Too few lines in one group to compare finding densities.
| Month | Lines added | Attributed to AI |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-07 | 2,225 | 0% |
| 2026-08 | 277 | 0% |
| 2026-09 | 29 | 0% |
| 2026-10 | 94 | 0% |
| 2026-11 | 7 | 0% |
Evidence
- Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (34c3d128f151)
- Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (e0849d9d392c)
- Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (70ff9d70d375)
- Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (74b7bd198452)
- CLAUDE.md (claude-code configuration) (CLAUDE.md)
AI provenance describes how code was produced; it is not a quality judgment. Unless attribution is explicit, these are signals consistent with AI generation, not proof. Squash/rebase workflows, imported code, and rewritten history reduce accuracy.
Code quality
Code quality is weak: test-to-source ratio 0.00, no CI test run detected; 0% of function code in complex or long functions; 2% duplicated lines. Weakest area: testing.
| Area | Score |
|---|---|
| Complexity (lizard) | 100 |
| Duplication | 89 |
| Code smells (Opengrep) | 82 |
| Tests and CI | 0 |
| Documentation | 40 |
| Type safety | n/a |
| Process (Scorecard review/maintenance) | n/a |
- Functions: 8; mean complexity 2.6, 90th percentile 6; 0 complex and 0 long functions
- Duplicated lines: 1.9% of 1,489 compared
- Tests: 0 test lines for 2,012 source lines (ratio 0.00); CI test commands: none detected; 0% of recent source commits also change tests
- Docs missing or thin: license, contributing, changelog
Security
Security posture is adequate: no high-impact findings. Weakest area: posture.
| Area | Score |
|---|---|
| Secrets (gitleaks, tree + history) | 100 |
| Static analysis (Opengrep) | 100 |
| Vulnerable dependencies (OSV) | n/a |
| CI workflows (zizmor) | n/a |
| Posture (policy, updates, signing, lockfiles) | 0 |
| OpenSSF Scorecard | n/a |
- Posture checks passed: lockfiles; missing: security policy, dependency updates, signed commits
Static signals only: the scorer never runs the project's code. Secret findings are pattern matches that were not verified, and secret values are never stored.
Repository profile
- Source lines: 2,012; test lines: 0
| Language | Lines |
|---|---|
| Shell | 1,849 |
| Lua | 159 |
| JavaScript | 4 |