Leaderboard github.com
javagrowing/JGrowing
Java is Growing up but not only Java。Java成长路线，但学到不仅仅是Java。
AI provenance
0%
none-detected
- Confidence
- 65%
- Coverage
- 100%
Estimated share of AI-generated code. Explicit attribution is a lower bound.
Code quality
80/100
adequate
- Confidence
- 90%
- Coverage
- 100%
Complexity, duplication, lint density, tests, CI, docs and review process.
Security
86/100
strong
- Confidence
- 85%
- Coverage
- 100%
Secrets, static analysis, vulnerable dependencies, CI and supply-chain posture.
AI provenance
0% none-detected
No AI attribution or AI-consistent velocity signals detected.
How the score is built
- Explicitly attributed share0%
- Unattributed share in AI-pace bursts0%
- Estimated AI-generated share0%
- AI tool configuration files0
- Work sessions at AI pace0
- Releases at AI pacenot measured
- Coding-style index (1.0+ means possible)0.00
Lines added per month all AI-attributed share
- 2019-020 · 0% AI
- 2019-030 · 0% AI
- 2019-040 · 0% AI
- 2019-050 · 0% AI
Evidence by analyzer
Explicit AI attributionok
- attributed_commit_share
- 0.0%
- attributed_commits
- 0
- attributed_loc
- 0
- attributed_loc_share
- 0.0%
- commits
- 119
- effective_loc
- 0
- tools_detected
- 0
AI tool configurationok
- artifacts
- 0
- tools_configured
- 0
- workflow_agents
- 0
Commit velocityok
- excluded_import_loc
- 0
- flagged_loc
- 0
- flagged_loc_share
- 0.0%
- flagged_units
- 0
- max_loc_per_hour
- 0
- measured_loc
- 0
- median_loc_per_hour
- 0
- pr_timed_units
- 0
- pre_ai_era_burst_loc
- 0
- pre_ai_era_bursts
- 0
- pre_ai_era_measured_loc
- 0
- work_units
- 0
Release velocityskipped
Coding styleok
- count:assistant_voice
- 0
- count:emoji_in_code
- 0
- count:narrated_steps
- 0
- count:placeholder
- 0
- files:assistant_voice
- 0
- files:emoji_in_code
- 0
- files:narrated_steps
- 0
- files:placeholder
- 0
- index
- 0
- lines_scanned
- 200
- per_kloc:assistant_voice
- 0
- per_kloc:emoji_in_code
- 0
- per_kloc:narrated_steps
- 0
- per_kloc:placeholder
- 0
Code quality
80 adequate
Code quality is adequate: test-to-source ratio 1.25, no CI test run detected; 0% of function code in complex or long functions; 0% duplicated lines. Weakest area: testing.
How the score is built
- Complexity100
- Duplication100
- Lint and smells100
- Tests and CI45
- Documentation65
- Type safetynot measured
- Review processnot measured
Evidence by analyzer
Complexity (lizard)ok
- complex_functions
- 0
- function_nloc
- 98
- functions
- 21
- long_functions
- 0
- many_param_functions
- 0
- mean_ccn
- 1.48
- p90_ccn
- 3
- risky_nloc_share
- 0.0%
Duplication (jscpd)ok
- compared_lines
- 90
- duplicated_lines
- 0
- duplicated_share
- 0.0%
- files
- 10
Lintok
- findings
- 0
- scanned_lines
- 200
- weighted_findings
- 0
Tests and CIok
- check:ci_present
- no
- check:ci_runs_lint
- no
- check:ci_runs_tests
- no
- check:has_tests
- yes
- check:test_ratio
- yes
- check:tests_cochange
- no
- ci_files
- 0
- cochange_commits
- 0
- cochange_share
- 0.0%
- source_lines
- 200
- test_lines
- 251
- test_ratio
- 1.25
Documentationok2 items
- README.md
README.md - LICENSE
LICENSE
- check:changelog
- no
- check:contributing
- no
- check:license
- yes
- check:readme
- yes
- readme_lines
- 113
Type safetyskipped
Security
86 strong
Security posture is strong: 1 known vulnerabilities in 1 dependencies. Weakest area: posture.
How the score is built
- Secrets100
- Static analysis (SAST)92
- Vulnerable dependencies95
- CI workflowsnot measured
- Security posture20
- OpenSSF Scorecardnot measured
Evidence by analyzer
OpenSSF Scorecardskipped
no published OpenSSF Scorecard result for this repo
Package registriesskipped
no registry dependencies declared
Secrets (gitleaks)ok
- secrets_current
- 0
- secrets_history
- 0
- secrets_low_confidence
- 0
- secrets_nonprod
- 0
Static analysis (opengrep)ok
- findings
- 1
- findings_high
- 0
- findings_low
- 0
- findings_medium
- 1
- parse_errors
- 0
- scanned_lines
- 200
- weighted_findings
- 0.25
Dependencies (osv-scanner)ok
- penalty
- 3
- vulnerabilities
- 1
- vulnerable_packages
- 1
- vulns_critical
- 0
- vulns_high
- 0
- vulns_low
- 0
- vulns_medium
- 1
- vulns_unknown
- 0
CI workflows (zizmor)skipped
Security postureok
- check:dependency_updates
- no
- check:lockfiles
- yes
- check:security_policy
- no
- check:signed_commits
- yes
- signed_commit_share
- 93.3%
- unpinned_manifests
- 0
Release downloadsok
- binary_assets
- 0
- signals
- 0
- suspicious
- 0
Findings
2 medium
| Severity | Rule | Location | Message | Tool |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| medium | osv/GHSA-269g-pwp5-87pp |
分析设计/设计模式/几种单例模式的Java实现/pom.xml | junit:[email protected] (Maven) is affected by GHSA-269g-pwp5-87pp | Dependencies (osv-scanner) |
| medium | opengrep/java.lang.security.audit.unsafe-reflection |
分析设计/设计模式/几种单例模式的Java实现/src/main/java/org/xuyuji/pattern/singleton/ContainerSingleton.java:20 | If an attacker can supply values that the application then uses to determine which class to instantiate or which method to invoke, the potential exists for the attacker to create control flow paths through the application that were not... | Static analysis (opengrep) |
Tools and coverage
Every analyzer that ran on this commit. A failed or skipped tool is a coverage gap: its share of the score is left out and the coverage figure drops.
| Analyzer | Pillar | Status | Version | Findings | Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI tool configuration | AI provenance | ok | signatures-v1 | 0 | |
| Explicit AI attribution | AI provenance | ok | signatures-v1 | 0 | |
| Release velocity | AI provenance | skipped | — | 0 | |
| Coding style | AI provenance | ok | — | 0 | |
| Commit velocity | AI provenance | ok | prov-4 | 0 | |
| Complexity (lizard) | Code quality | ok | lizard 1.25.1 | 0 | |
| Documentation | Code quality | ok | — | 0 | |
| Duplication (jscpd) | Code quality | ok | repotrust-dup-w6 | 0 | |
| Lint | Code quality | ok | opengrep 1.33.1; rules f1d2b562b414 | 0 | |
| Tests and CI | Code quality | ok | — | 0 | |
| Type safety | Code quality | skipped | — | 0 | |
| CI workflows (zizmor) | Security | skipped | — | 0 | |
| Dependencies (osv-scanner) | Security | ok | osv-scanner version: 2.7.1 | 1 | |
| Release downloads | Security | ok | — | 0 | |
| Security posture | Security | ok | — | 0 | |
| Package registries | Security | skipped | — | 0 | no registry dependencies declared |
| Static analysis (opengrep) | Security | ok | opengrep 1.33.1; rules f1d2b562b414 | 1 | |
| OpenSSF Scorecard | Security | skipped | — | 0 | no published OpenSSF Scorecard result for this repo |
| Secrets (gitleaks) | Security | ok | gitleaks 8.30.1 | 0 |
Score history
Scores from different scoring versions aren't directly comparable.
| Scored | Commit | Scoring | AI provenance | Quality | Security |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-11-14 | 425cd785cb93 | prov-5+qual-2+sec-2 | 0% | 80 | 86 |
| 2026-11-14 | 425cd785cb93 | prov-4+qual-2+sec-2 | 0% | 80 | 86 |
Full text report
- Repository: https://github.com/javagrowing/JGrowing
- Commit:
425cd785cb93c9daeaf3630529ece76ca4a7bbd3 - Generated: 2026-11-14T14:52:05+00:00
- Scorer 0.1.0, scoring prov-5+qual-2+sec-2, report schema v2
Scores
| Pillar | Score | Signal | Confidence | Coverage |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI provenance (estimated AI-generated share) | 0 | none-detected | 65% | 100% |
| Code quality | 80 | adequate | 90% | 100% |
| Security | 86 | strong | 85% | 100% |
AI provenance
No AI attribution or AI-consistent velocity signals detected.
- Explicitly attributed share (lower bound): 0.0%
- Unattributed share in AI-consistent velocity bursts: 0.0%
- Estimated AI-generated share: 0.0%
AI provenance describes how code was produced; it is not a quality judgment. Unless attribution is explicit, these are signals consistent with AI generation, not proof. Squash/rebase workflows, imported code, and rewritten history reduce accuracy.
Code quality
Code quality is adequate: test-to-source ratio 1.25, no CI test run detected; 0% of function code in complex or long functions; 0% duplicated lines. Weakest area: testing.
| Area | Score |
|---|---|
| Complexity (lizard) | 100 |
| Duplication | 100 |
| Code smells (Opengrep) | 100 |
| Tests and CI | 45 |
| Documentation | 65 |
| Type safety | n/a |
| Process (Scorecard review/maintenance) | n/a |
- Functions: 21; mean complexity 1.5, 90th percentile 3; 0 complex and 0 long functions
- Duplicated lines: 0.0% of 90 compared
- Tests: 251 test lines for 200 source lines (ratio 1.25); CI test commands: none detected; 0% of recent source commits also change tests
- Docs missing or thin: contributing, changelog
Security
Security posture is strong: 1 known vulnerabilities in 1 dependencies. Weakest area: posture.
| Area | Score |
|---|---|
| Secrets (gitleaks, tree + history) | 100 |
| Static analysis (Opengrep) | 92 |
| Vulnerable dependencies (OSV) | 95 |
| CI workflows (zizmor) | n/a |
| Posture (policy, updates, signing, lockfiles) | 20 |
| OpenSSF Scorecard | n/a |
-
Known vulnerabilities: 1 in 1 packages (critical 0, high 0, medium 1, low 0)
-
Posture checks passed: signed commits, lockfiles; missing: security policy, dependency updates
Top findings
| Severity | Finding | Location |
|---|---|---|
| medium | opengrep/java.lang.security.audit.unsafe-reflection: If an attacker can supply values that the application then uses to determine which class to instantiate or which method to invoke, the potential exists for the attacker to create control flow paths through the application that were not intended by the application developers. This attack vector may a [confidence low] |
分析设计/设计模式/几种单例模式的Java实现/src/main/java/org/xuyuji/pattern/singleton/ContainerSingleton.java:20 |
| medium | osv/GHSA-269g-pwp5-87pp: junit:[email protected] (Maven) is affected by GHSA-269g-pwp5-87pp |
分析设计/设计模式/几种单例模式的Java实现/pom.xml |
Static signals only: the scorer never runs the project's code. Secret findings are pattern matches that were not verified, and secret values are never stored.
Repository profile
- Source lines: 200; test lines: 251
| Language | Lines |
|---|---|
| Java | 451 |