Leaderboard github.com

jarjin/LuaFramework_UGUI

请移步新版地址https://github.com/jarjin/LuaFramework_UGUI_V2 支持安卓ARM64【已停止更新】

View repository ↗
C#
★ 1,916
commit f4330759924a
scored 2026-11-14
scoring prov-5+qual-2+sec-2

AI provenance

none-detected

Confidence: 65%
Coverage: 100%

Estimated share of AI-generated code. Explicit attribution is a lower bound.

Code quality

38/100

poor

Confidence: 90%
Coverage: 100%

Complexity, duplication, lint density, tests, CI, docs and review process.

Security

80/100

adequate

Confidence: 85%
Coverage: 100%

Secrets, static analysis, vulnerable dependencies, CI and supply-chain posture.

Dispute or request a re-score Full report JSON

AI provenance

0% none-detected

No AI attribution or AI-consistent velocity signals detected.

How the score is built

Explicitly attributed share0%
Unattributed share in AI-pace bursts0%
Estimated AI-generated share0%
AI tool configuration files0
Work sessions at AI pace0
Releases at AI pace0
Coding-style index (1.0+ means possible)0.00

Lines added per month all AI-attributed share

2016-0157,377 · 0% AI
2016-02231 · 0% AI
2016-0312,805 · 0% AI
2016-04118 · 0% AI
2016-057,959 · 0% AI
2016-06699 · 0% AI
2016-07535 · 0% AI
2016-084,907 · 0% AI
2016-09113 · 0% AI
2016-10791 · 0% AI
2016-111 · 0% AI
2016-1228 · 0% AI
2017-0138 · 0% AI
2017-02105 · 0% AI
2017-032 · 0% AI
2017-049 · 0% AI
2017-064,809 · 0% AI
2017-0715,517 · 0% AI
2017-081,277 · 0% AI
2017-09107 · 0% AI
2017-1177 · 0% AI
2017-12468 · 0% AI
2018-019 · 0% AI
2018-053,962 · 0% AI
2018-082 · 0% AI
2019-0412 · 0% AI
2019-060 · 0% AI

Evidence by analyzer

Explicit AI attributionok

attributed_commit_share: 0.0%
attributed_commits: 0
attributed_loc: 0
attributed_loc_share: 0.0%
commits: 113
effective_loc: 111,958
tools_detected: 0

AI tool configurationok

artifacts: 0
tools_configured: 0
workflow_agents: 0

Commit velocityok

excluded_import_loc: 77,768
flagged_loc: 0
flagged_loc_share: 0.0%
flagged_units: 0
max_loc_per_hour: 2,510
measured_loc: 34,190
median_loc_per_hour: 109.94
pr_timed_units: 0
pre_ai_era_burst_loc: 22,197
pre_ai_era_bursts: 4
pre_ai_era_measured_loc: 34,190
work_units: 80

Release velocityok

flagged_releases: 0
max_loc_per_day: 0
releases: 0

Coding styleok

count:assistant_voice: 0
count:emoji_in_code: 0
count:narrated_steps: 0
count:placeholder: 0
files:assistant_voice: 0
files:emoji_in_code: 0
files:narrated_steps: 0
files:placeholder: 0
index: 0
lines_scanned: 84,629
per_kloc:assistant_voice: 0
per_kloc:emoji_in_code: 0
per_kloc:narrated_steps: 0
per_kloc:placeholder: 0

Code quality

38 poor

Code quality is poor: test-to-source ratio 0.00, no CI test run detected; 16% of function code in complex or long functions; 44% duplicated lines. Weakest area: testing.

How the score is built

Complexity61
Duplication7
Lint and smells100
Tests and CI0
Documentation40
Type safetynot measured
Review processnot measured

Evidence by analyzer

Complexity (lizard)ok10 items

complex_functions: 80
function_nloc: 50,374
functions: 4,112
long_functions: 31
many_param_functions: 11
mean_ccn: 2.99
p90_ccn: 5
risky_nloc_share: 16.3%

Duplication (jscpd)ok10 items

compared_lines: 55,622
duplicated_lines: 24,265
duplicated_share: 43.6%
files: 318

Lintok

findings: 0
scanned_lines: 46,254
weighted_findings: 0

Tests and CIok

check:ci_present: no
check:ci_runs_lint: no
check:ci_runs_tests: no
check:has_tests: no
check:test_ratio: no
check:tests_cochange: no
ci_files: 0
cochange_commits: 95
cochange_share: 0.0%
source_lines: 84,629
test_lines: 0
test_ratio: 0

Documentationok1 item

ReadMe.txt ReadMe.txt

check:changelog: no
check:contributing: no
check:license: no
check:readme: yes
readme_lines: 160

Type safetyskipped

Security

80 adequate

Security posture is adequate: no high-impact findings. Weakest area: posture.

How the score is built

Secrets97
Static analysis (SAST)100
Vulnerable dependenciesnot measured
CI workflowsnot measured
Security posture0
OpenSSF Scorecardnot measured

Evidence by analyzer

OpenSSF Scorecardskipped

no published OpenSSF Scorecard result for this repo

Package registriesskipped

no registry dependencies declared

Secrets (gitleaks)ok

secrets_current: 0
secrets_history: 0
secrets_low_confidence: 0
secrets_nonprod: 1

Static analysis (opengrep)ok

findings: 0
findings_high: 0
findings_low: 0
findings_medium: 0
parse_errors: 2
scanned_lines: 46,254
weighted_findings: 0

Dependencies (osv-scanner)skipped

CI workflows (zizmor)skipped

Security postureok

check:dependency_updates: no
check:lockfiles: yes
check:security_policy: no
check:signed_commits: no
signed_commit_share: 0.9%
unpinned_manifests: 0

Release downloadsok

binary_assets: 0
signals: 0
suspicious: 0

Findings

1 low

Severity	Rule	Location	Message	Tool
low	`gitleaks/generic-api-key`	Assets/LuaFramework/Examples/Editor/WelcomeScreen.cs:121	Possible generic-api-key secret in the current tree (test/docs/example file)	Secrets (gitleaks)

Tools and coverage

Every analyzer that ran on this commit. A failed or skipped tool is a coverage gap: its share of the score is left out and the coverage figure drops.

Analyzer	Pillar	Status	Version	Findings	Note
AI tool configuration	AI provenance	ok	`signatures-v1`	0
Explicit AI attribution	AI provenance	ok	`signatures-v1`	0
Release velocity	AI provenance	ok	`prov-4`	0
Coding style	AI provenance	ok	`—`	0
Commit velocity	AI provenance	ok	`prov-4`	0
Complexity (lizard)	Code quality	ok	`lizard 1.25.1`	0
Documentation	Code quality	ok	`—`	0
Duplication (jscpd)	Code quality	ok	`repotrust-dup-w6`	0
Lint	Code quality	ok	`opengrep 1.33.1; rules f1d2b562b414`	0
Tests and CI	Code quality	ok	`—`	0
Type safety	Code quality	skipped	`—`	0
CI workflows (zizmor)	Security	skipped	`—`	0
Dependencies (osv-scanner)	Security	skipped	`—`	0
Release downloads	Security	ok	`—`	0
Security posture	Security	ok	`—`	0
Package registries	Security	skipped	`—`	0	no registry dependencies declared
Static analysis (opengrep)	Security	ok	`opengrep 1.33.1; rules f1d2b562b414`	0
OpenSSF Scorecard	Security	skipped	`—`	0	no published OpenSSF Scorecard result for this repo
Secrets (gitleaks)	Security	ok	`gitleaks 8.30.1`	1

Score history

Scores from different scoring versions aren't directly comparable.

Scored	Commit	Scoring	AI provenance	Quality	Security
2026-11-14	`f4330759924a`	`prov-5+qual-2+sec-2`	0%	38	80
2026-11-14	`f4330759924a`	`prov-4+qual-2+sec-2`	0%	38	80

Embed a badge

Maintainers can show these in a README. Badges update when the repository is re-scored.

[![RepoTrust ai](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/badge/github.com/jarjin/LuaFramework_UGUI/ai.svg)](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/r/github.com/jarjin/LuaFramework_UGUI/)

[![RepoTrust quality](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/badge/github.com/jarjin/LuaFramework_UGUI/quality.svg)](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/r/github.com/jarjin/LuaFramework_UGUI/)

[![RepoTrust security](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/badge/github.com/jarjin/LuaFramework_UGUI/security.svg)](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/r/github.com/jarjin/LuaFramework_UGUI/)

Full text report

Repository: https://github.com/jarjin/LuaFramework_UGUI
Commit: f4330759924ad4d4e71336e3687b2c81f84edc07
Generated: 2026-11-14T14:52:05+00:00
Scorer 0.1.0, scoring prov-5+qual-2+sec-2, report schema v2

Scores

Pillar	Score	Signal	Confidence	Coverage
AI provenance (estimated AI-generated share)	0	none-detected	65%	100%
Code quality	38	poor	90%	100%
Security	80	adequate	85%	100%

AI provenance

No AI attribution or AI-consistent velocity signals detected.

Explicitly attributed share (lower bound): 0.0%
Unattributed share in AI-consistent velocity bursts: 0.0%
Estimated AI-generated share: 0.0%

Month	Lines added	Attributed to AI
2017-03	2	0%
2017-04	9	0%
2017-06	4,809	0%
2017-07	15,517	0%
2017-08	1,277	0%
2017-09	107	0%
2017-11	77	0%
2017-12	468	0%
2018-01	9	0%
2018-05	3,962	0%
2018-08	2	0%
2019-04	12	0%

AI provenance describes how code was produced; it is not a quality judgment. Unless attribution is explicit, these are signals consistent with AI generation, not proof. Squash/rebase workflows, imported code, and rewritten history reduce accuracy.

Code quality

Code quality is poor: test-to-source ratio 0.00, no CI test run detected; 16% of function code in complex or long functions; 44% duplicated lines. Weakest area: testing.

Area	Score
Complexity (lizard)	61
Duplication	7
Code smells (Opengrep)	100
Tests and CI	0
Documentation	40
Type safety	n/a
Process (Scorecard review/maintenance)	n/a

Functions: 4,112; mean complexity 3.0, 90th percentile 5; 80 complex and 31 long functions
Duplicated lines: 43.6% of 55,622 compared
Tests: 0 test lines for 84,629 source lines (ratio 0.00); CI test commands: none detected; 0% of recent source commits also change tests
Docs missing or thin: license, contributing, changelog

Most complex functions:

Security

Security posture is adequate: no high-impact findings. Weakest area: posture.

Area	Score
Secrets (gitleaks, tree + history)	97
Static analysis (Opengrep)	100
Vulnerable dependencies (OSV)	n/a
CI workflows (zizmor)	n/a
Posture (policy, updates, signing, lockfiles)	0
OpenSSF Scorecard	n/a

Posture checks passed: lockfiles; missing: security policy, dependency updates, signed commits

Top findings

Severity	Finding	Location
low	`gitleaks/generic-api-key`: Possible generic-api-key secret in the current tree (test/docs/example file)	Assets/LuaFramework/Examples/Editor/WelcomeScreen.cs:121

Static signals only: the scorer never runs the project's code. Secret findings are pattern matches that were not verified, and secret values are never stored.

Repository profile

Source lines: 84,629; test lines: 0

Language	Lines
C#	46,254
Lua	38,375