RepoTrust

Leaderboard github.com

iissmart/firefox-auto-refresh-tab

Auto Refresh Tab

  • View repository ↗
  • JavaScript
  • ★ 0
  • commit 88d362068309
  • scored 2026-11-14
  • scoring prov-5+qual-2+sec-2

AI provenance

0%

none-detected

Confidence
57%
Coverage
100%

Estimated share of AI-generated code. Explicit attribution is a lower bound.

Code quality

57/100

weak

Confidence
90%
Coverage
100%

Complexity, duplication, lint density, tests, CI, docs and review process.

Security

73/100

adequate

Confidence
85%
Coverage
100%

Secrets, static analysis, vulnerable dependencies, CI and supply-chain posture.

AI provenance

0% none-detected

No AI attribution or AI-consistent velocity signals detected.

How the score is built

  • Explicitly attributed share0%
  • Unattributed share in AI-pace bursts0%
  • Estimated AI-generated share0%
  • AI tool configuration files0
  • Work sessions at AI pace0
  • Releases at AI pace0
  • Coding-style index (1.0+ means possible)0.00

Lines added per month all AI-attributed share

  1. 2026-03357 · 0% AI
  2. 2026-04118 · 0% AI
  3. 2026-05298 · 0% AI
  4. 2026-08163 · 0% AI
  5. 2026-1016 · 0% AI

Evidence by analyzer

Explicit AI attributionok
attributed_commit_share
0.0%
attributed_commits
0
attributed_loc
0
attributed_loc_share
0.0%
commits
69
effective_loc
952
tools_detected
0
AI tool configurationok
artifacts
0
tools_configured
0
workflow_agents
0
Commit velocityok
excluded_import_loc
0
flagged_loc
0
flagged_loc_share
0.0%
flagged_units
0
max_loc_per_hour
65.01
measured_loc
952
median_loc_per_hour
30.40
pr_timed_units
0
pre_ai_era_burst_loc
0
pre_ai_era_bursts
0
pre_ai_era_measured_loc
0
work_units
12
Release velocityok
flagged_releases
0
max_loc_per_day
561.10
releases
13
Coding styleok
count:assistant_voice
0
count:emoji_in_code
0
count:narrated_steps
0
count:placeholder
0
files:assistant_voice
0
files:emoji_in_code
0
files:narrated_steps
0
files:placeholder
0
index
0
lines_scanned
799
per_kloc:assistant_voice
0
per_kloc:emoji_in_code
0
per_kloc:narrated_steps
0
per_kloc:placeholder
0

Code quality

57 weak

Code quality is weak: test-to-source ratio 0.00, no CI test run detected; 31% of function code in complex or long functions; 0% duplicated lines. Weakest area: testing.

How the score is built

  • Complexity39
  • Duplication100
  • Lint and smells100
  • Tests and CI15
  • Documentation65
  • Type safetynot measured
  • Review processnot measured

Evidence by analyzer

Complexity (lizard)ok4 items
complex_functions
4
function_nloc
512
functions
43
long_functions
0
many_param_functions
0
mean_ccn
4.47
p90_ccn
13
risky_nloc_share
31.2%
Duplication (jscpd)ok
compared_lines
555
duplicated_lines
0
duplicated_share
0.0%
files
5
Lintok
findings
0
scanned_lines
716
weighted_findings
0
Tests and CIok1 item
  • CI config: .github/workflows/release.yml .github/workflows/release.yml
check:ci_present
yes
check:ci_runs_lint
no
check:ci_runs_tests
no
check:has_tests
no
check:test_ratio
no
check:tests_cochange
no
ci_files
1
cochange_commits
37
cochange_share
0.0%
source_lines
799
test_lines
0
test_ratio
0
Documentationok2 items
  • README.md README.md
  • LICENSE LICENSE
check:changelog
no
check:contributing
no
check:license
yes
check:readme
yes
readme_lines
44
Type safetyskipped

Security

73 adequate

Security posture is adequate: 3 high-severity workflow issues. Weakest area: posture.

How the score is built

  • Secrets100
  • Static analysis (SAST)84
  • Vulnerable dependenciesnot measured
  • CI workflows63
  • Security posture0
  • OpenSSF Scorecardnot measured

Evidence by analyzer

OpenSSF Scorecardskipped

no published OpenSSF Scorecard result for this repo

Package registriesskipped

no registry dependencies declared

Secrets (gitleaks)ok
secrets_current
0
secrets_history
0
secrets_low_confidence
0
secrets_nonprod
0
Static analysis (opengrep)ok
findings
2
findings_high
0
findings_low
0
findings_medium
2
parse_errors
0
scanned_lines
716
weighted_findings
0.50
Dependencies (osv-scanner)skipped
CI workflows (zizmor)ok
findings
5
findings_high
3
findings_low
2
findings_medium
0
penalty
27.90
workflows
1
Security postureok
check:dependency_updates
no
check:lockfiles
yes
check:security_policy
no
check:signed_commits
no
signed_commit_share
1.5%
unpinned_manifests
0
Release downloadsok
binary_assets
0
signals
0
suspicious
0

Findings

3 high2 medium1 low1 info

SeverityRuleLocationMessageTool
high zizmor/unpinned-uses .github/workflows/release.yml:25 unpinned action reference [confidence high] CI workflows (zizmor)
high zizmor/cache-poisoning .github/workflows/release.yml:29 runtime artifacts potentially vulnerable to a cache poisoning attack [confidence low] CI workflows (zizmor)
high zizmor/unpinned-uses .github/workflows/release.yml:29 unpinned action reference [confidence high] CI workflows (zizmor)
medium opengrep/javascript.lang.security.html-in-template-string background.js:34 This template literal looks like HTML and has interpolated variables. These variables are not HTML-encoded by default. If the variables contain HTML tags, these may be interpreted by the browser, resulting in cross-site scripting (XSS).... Static analysis (opengrep)
medium opengrep/javascript.lang.security.html-in-template-string background.js:36 This template literal looks like HTML and has interpolated variables. These variables are not HTML-encoded by default. If the variables contain HTML tags, these may be interpreted by the browser, resulting in cross-site scripting (XSS).... Static analysis (opengrep)
low zizmor/artipacked .github/workflows/release.yml:25 credential persistence through GitHub Actions artifacts [confidence low] CI workflows (zizmor)
info zizmor/template-injection .github/workflows/release.yml:72 code injection via template expansion [confidence low] CI workflows (zizmor)

Tools and coverage

Every analyzer that ran on this commit. A failed or skipped tool is a coverage gap: its share of the score is left out and the coverage figure drops.

AnalyzerPillarStatusVersionFindingsNote
AI tool configurationAI provenanceoksignatures-v10
Explicit AI attributionAI provenanceoksignatures-v10
Release velocityAI provenanceokprov-40
Coding styleAI provenanceok—0
Commit velocityAI provenanceokprov-40
Complexity (lizard)Code qualityoklizard 1.25.10
DocumentationCode qualityok—0
Duplication (jscpd)Code qualityokrepotrust-dup-w60
LintCode qualityokopengrep 1.33.1; rules f1d2b562b4140
Tests and CICode qualityok—0
Type safetyCode qualityskipped—0
CI workflows (zizmor)Securityokzizmor 1.32.05
Dependencies (osv-scanner)Securityskipped—0
Release downloadsSecurityok—0
Security postureSecurityok—0
Package registriesSecurityskipped—0no registry dependencies declared
Static analysis (opengrep)Securityokopengrep 1.33.1; rules f1d2b562b4142
OpenSSF ScorecardSecurityskipped—0no published OpenSSF Scorecard result for this repo
Secrets (gitleaks)Securityokgitleaks 8.30.10

Score history

Scores from different scoring versions aren't directly comparable.

ScoredCommitScoringAI provenanceQualitySecurity
2026-11-1488d362068309prov-5+qual-2+sec-20%5773
2026-11-1488d362068309prov-4+qual-2+sec-20%5773

Embed a badge

Maintainers can show these in a README. Badges update when the repository is re-scored.

[![RepoTrust ai](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/badge/github.com/iissmart/firefox-auto-refresh-tab/ai.svg)](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/r/github.com/iissmart/firefox-auto-refresh-tab/)
[![RepoTrust quality](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/badge/github.com/iissmart/firefox-auto-refresh-tab/quality.svg)](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/r/github.com/iissmart/firefox-auto-refresh-tab/)
[![RepoTrust security](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/badge/github.com/iissmart/firefox-auto-refresh-tab/security.svg)](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/r/github.com/iissmart/firefox-auto-refresh-tab/)
Full text report

Scores

Pillar Score Signal Confidence Coverage
AI provenance (estimated AI-generated share) 0 none-detected 57% 100%
Code quality 57 weak 90% 100%
Security 73 adequate 85% 100%

AI provenance

No AI attribution or AI-consistent velocity signals detected.

  • Explicitly attributed share (lower bound): 0.0%
  • Unattributed share in AI-consistent velocity bursts: 0.0%
  • Estimated AI-generated share: 0.0%
Month Lines added Attributed to AI
2026-03 357 0%
2026-04 118 0%
2026-05 298 0%
2026-08 163 0%
2026-10 16 0%

AI provenance describes how code was produced; it is not a quality judgment. Unless attribution is explicit, these are signals consistent with AI generation, not proof. Squash/rebase workflows, imported code, and rewritten history reduce accuracy.

Code quality

Code quality is weak: test-to-source ratio 0.00, no CI test run detected; 31% of function code in complex or long functions; 0% duplicated lines. Weakest area: testing.

Area Score
Complexity (lizard) 39
Duplication 100
Code smells (Opengrep) 100
Tests and CI 15
Documentation 65
Type safety n/a
Process (Scorecard review/maintenance) n/a
  • Functions: 43; mean complexity 4.5, 90th percentile 13; 4 complex and 0 long functions
  • Duplicated lines: 0.0% of 555 compared
  • Tests: 0 test lines for 799 source lines (ratio 0.00); CI test commands: none detected; 0% of recent source commits also change tests
  • Docs missing or thin: contributing, changelog

Most complex functions:

Security

Security posture is adequate: 3 high-severity workflow issues. Weakest area: posture.

Area Score
Secrets (gitleaks, tree + history) 100
Static analysis (Opengrep) 84
Vulnerable dependencies (OSV) n/a
CI workflows (zizmor) 63
Posture (policy, updates, signing, lockfiles) 0
OpenSSF Scorecard n/a
  • Posture checks passed: lockfiles; missing: security policy, dependency updates, signed commits

Top findings

Severity Finding Location
high zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] .github/workflows/release.yml:25
high zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] .github/workflows/release.yml:29
high zizmor/cache-poisoning: runtime artifacts potentially vulnerable to a cache poisoning attack [confidence low] .github/workflows/release.yml:29
medium opengrep/javascript.lang.security.html-in-template-string: This template literal looks like HTML and has interpolated variables. These variables are not HTML-encoded by default. If the variables contain HTML tags, these may be interpreted by the browser, resulting in cross-site scripting (XSS). [confidence low] background.js:34
medium opengrep/javascript.lang.security.html-in-template-string: This template literal looks like HTML and has interpolated variables. These variables are not HTML-encoded by default. If the variables contain HTML tags, these may be interpreted by the browser, resulting in cross-site scripting (XSS). [confidence low] background.js:36
low zizmor/artipacked: credential persistence through GitHub Actions artifacts [confidence low] .github/workflows/release.yml:25
info zizmor/template-injection: code injection via template expansion [confidence low] .github/workflows/release.yml:72

Static signals only: the scorer never runs the project's code. Secret findings are pattern matches that were not verified, and secret values are never stored.

Repository profile

  • Source lines: 799; test lines: 0
Language Lines
JavaScript 667
PowerShell 83
Shell 49