Leaderboard github.com
hybridgroup/cylon
JavaScript framework for robotics, drones, and the Internet of Things (IoT)
AI provenance
0%
none-detected
- Confidence
- 65%
- Coverage
- 100%
Estimated share of AI-generated code. Explicit attribution is a lower bound.
Code quality
78/100
adequate
- Confidence
- 90%
- Coverage
- 100%
Complexity, duplication, lint density, tests, CI, docs and review process.
Security
54/100
weak
- Confidence
- 85%
- Coverage
- 100%
Secrets, static analysis, vulnerable dependencies, CI and supply-chain posture.
AI provenance
0% none-detected
No AI attribution or AI-consistent velocity signals detected.
How the score is built
- Explicitly attributed share0%
- Unattributed share in AI-pace bursts0%
- Estimated AI-generated share0%
- AI tool configuration files0
- Work sessions at AI pace0
- Releases at AI pace0
- Coding-style index (1.0+ means possible)0.00
Lines added per month all AI-attributed share
- 2013-10840 · 0% AI
- 2013-111,433 · 0% AI
- 2013-12513 · 0% AI
- 2014-01573 · 0% AI
- 2014-024,345 · 0% AI
- 2014-032,625 · 0% AI
- 2014-04885 · 0% AI
- 2014-052,003 · 0% AI
- 2014-061,660 · 0% AI
- 2014-07352 · 0% AI
- 2014-08359 · 0% AI
- 2014-09681 · 0% AI
- 2014-10834 · 0% AI
- 2014-111,047 · 0% AI
- 2014-121,567 · 0% AI
- 2015-01524 · 0% AI
- 2015-02950 · 0% AI
- 2015-03316 · 0% AI
- 2015-04364 · 0% AI
- 2015-0531 · 0% AI
- 2015-061,330 · 0% AI
- 2015-07207 · 0% AI
- 2015-09231 · 0% AI
- 2015-110 · 0% AI
- 2015-120 · 0% AI
- 2016-025 · 0% AI
- 2016-0330 · 0% AI
- 2016-040 · 0% AI
- 2016-051 · 0% AI
- 2016-0717 · 0% AI
Evidence by analyzer
Explicit AI attributionok
- attributed_commit_share
- 0.0%
- attributed_commits
- 0
- attributed_loc
- 0
- attributed_loc_share
- 0.0%
- commits
- 1,124
- effective_loc
- 23,723
- tools_detected
- 0
AI tool configurationok
- artifacts
- 0
- tools_configured
- 0
- workflow_agents
- 0
Commit velocityok
- excluded_import_loc
- 0
- flagged_loc
- 0
- flagged_loc_share
- 0.0%
- flagged_units
- 0
- max_loc_per_hour
- 627.25
- measured_loc
- 23,723
- median_loc_per_hour
- 46.26
- pr_timed_units
- 0
- pre_ai_era_burst_loc
- 0
- pre_ai_era_bursts
- 0
- pre_ai_era_measured_loc
- 23,723
- work_units
- 342
Release velocityok
- flagged_releases
- 0
- max_loc_per_day
- 616.90
- releases
- 42
Coding styleok
- count:assistant_voice
- 0
- count:emoji_in_code
- 0
- count:narrated_steps
- 0
- count:placeholder
- 0
- files:assistant_voice
- 0
- files:emoji_in_code
- 0
- files:narrated_steps
- 0
- files:placeholder
- 0
- index
- 0
- lines_scanned
- 3,502
- per_kloc:assistant_voice
- 0
- per_kloc:emoji_in_code
- 0
- per_kloc:narrated_steps
- 0
- per_kloc:placeholder
- 0
Code quality
78 adequate
Code quality is adequate: test-to-source ratio 0.85, CI runs tests; 4% of function code in complex or long functions; 6% duplicated lines. Weakest area: process.
How the score is built
- Complexity88
- Duplication69
- Lint and smells85
- Tests and CI90
- Documentation100
- Type safetynot measured
- Review process5
Evidence by analyzer
Complexity (lizard)ok1 item
- complex_functions
- 1
- function_nloc
- 1,931
- functions
- 288
- long_functions
- 0
- many_param_functions
- 0
- mean_ccn
- 1.91
- p90_ccn
- 4
- risky_nloc_share
- 4.2%
Duplication (jscpd)ok6 items
- 6+ duplicated lines: examples/api/api.js:17 and examples/conway_sphero/conway_sphero.js:15
- 6+ duplicated lines: examples/conway_sphero/conway_sphero.js:1 and examples/conway_sphero/fluent-conway_sphero.js:1
- 6+ duplicated lines: examples/hello/hello.js:1 and examples/robot_commands/robot_commands.js:1
- 6+ duplicated lines: examples/salesforce/salesforce.js:6 and examples/sf-sphero/sf-sphero.js:8
- 6+ duplicated lines: examples/sf-sphero/sf-sphero.js:5 and examples/sphero-pebble-sf/sphero-pebble-sf.js:29
- 6+ duplicated lines: lib/validator.js:32 and lib/validator.js:46
- compared_lines
- 2,082
- duplicated_lines
- 127
- duplicated_share
- 6.1%
- files
- 41
Lintok
- category:best-practice
- 2
- category:correctness
- 1
- findings
- 3
- scanned_lines
- 3,502
- weighted_findings
- 2.25
Tests and CIok2 items
- CI config: .travis.yml
.travis.yml - CI runs tests (make ci)
- check:ci_present
- yes
- check:ci_runs_lint
- no
- check:ci_runs_tests
- yes
- check:has_tests
- yes
- check:test_ratio
- yes
- check:tests_cochange
- yes
- ci_files
- 1
- cochange_commits
- 180
- cochange_share
- 48.9%
- source_lines
- 3,502
- test_lines
- 2,966
- test_ratio
- 0.85
Documentationok4 items
- README.markdown
README.markdown - LICENSE
LICENSE - CONTRIBUTING.md
CONTRIBUTING.md - RELEASES.md
RELEASES.md
- check:changelog
- yes
- check:contributing
- yes
- check:license
- yes
- check:readme
- yes
- readme_lines
- 260
Type safetyskipped
Security
54 weak
Security posture is weak: 0 possible secret(s) in the tree, 1 only in history. Weakest area: posture.
How the score is built
- Secrets59
- Static analysis (SAST)90
- Vulnerable dependenciesnot measured
- CI workflowsnot measured
- Security posture0
- OpenSSF Scorecard25
Evidence by analyzer
OpenSSF Scorecardok9 items
- Scorecard Code-Review: 1/10 (Found 4/25 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1)
- Scorecard Maintained: 0/10 (0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0)
- Scorecard Binary-Artifacts: 10/10 (no binaries found in the repo)
- Scorecard CII-Best-Practices: 0/10 (no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected)
- Scorecard Security-Policy: 0/10 (security policy file not detected)
- Scorecard Fuzzing: 0/10 (project is not fuzzed)
- Scorecard License: 9/10 (license file detected)
- Scorecard Branch-Protection: 0/10 (branch protection not enabled on development/release branches)
- Scorecard SAST: 0/10 (SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0)
- aggregate
- 2.10
- check:Binary-Artifacts
- yes
- check:Branch-Protection
- no
- check:CII-Best-Practices
- no
- check:Code-Review
- yes
- check:Fuzzing
- no
- check:License
- yes
- check:Maintained
- no
- check:SAST
- no
- check:Security-Policy
- no
Package registriesok
- checked
- 5
- declared
- 5
- lookup_errors
- 0
- missing
- 0
- recent
- 0
Secrets (gitleaks)ok
- secrets_current
- 0
- secrets_history
- 1
- secrets_low_confidence
- 1
- secrets_nonprod
- 10
Static analysis (opengrep)ok
- findings
- 4
- findings_high
- 0
- findings_low
- 0
- findings_medium
- 4
- parse_errors
- 0
- scanned_lines
- 3,502
- weighted_findings
- 1
Dependencies (osv-scanner)skipped
CI workflows (zizmor)skipped
Security postureok1 item
- package.json has no lockfile alongside it (unpinned dependencies)
package.json
- check:dependency_updates
- no
- check:lockfiles
- no
- check:security_policy
- no
- check:signed_commits
- no
- signed_commit_share
- 0.0%
- unpinned_manifests
- 1
Release downloadsok
- binary_assets
- 0
- signals
- 0
- suspicious
- 0
Findings
7 medium12 low
19 findings
| Severity | Rule | Location | Message | Tool |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| medium | opengrep/javascript.lang.best-practice.lazy-load-module |
lib/registry.js:35 | Lazy loading can complicate code bundling if care is not taken, also `require`s are run synchronously by Node.js. If they are called from within a function, it may block other requests from being handled at a more critical time. The... | Lint |
| medium | opengrep/javascript.lang.best-practice.lazy-load-module |
lib/registry.js:37 | Lazy loading can complicate code bundling if care is not taken, also `require`s are run synchronously by Node.js. If they are called from within a function, it may block other requests from being handled at a more critical time. The... | Lint |
| medium | opengrep/javascript.lang.security.audit.detect-non-literal-require |
lib/api.js:32 | Detected the use of require(variable). Calling require with a non-literal argument might allow an attacker to load and run arbitrary code, or access arbitrary files. [confidence low] | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| medium | opengrep/javascript.lang.security.audit.unsafe-dynamic-method |
lib/initializer.js:31 | Using non-static data to retrieve and run functions from the object is dangerous. If the data is user-controlled, it may allow executing arbitrary code. [confidence low] | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| medium | opengrep/javascript.lang.security.audit.unsafe-dynamic-method |
lib/initializer.js:44 | Using non-static data to retrieve and run functions from the object is dangerous. If the data is user-controlled, it may allow executing arbitrary code. [confidence low] | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| medium | opengrep/javascript.lang.security.audit.detect-non-literal-require |
lib/registry.js:37 | Detected the use of require(variable). Calling require with a non-literal argument might allow an attacker to load and run arbitrary code, or access arbitrary files. [confidence low] | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| medium | gitleaks/private-key |
lib/ssl/server.key:1 | Possible private-key secret in history (commit ea022d3880); removed from the current tree but still retrievable | Secrets (gitleaks) |
| low | opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.useless-assignment |
lib/validator.js:31 | `checks.singleObjectSyntax` is assigned twice; the first assignment is useless | Lint |
| low | gitleaks/generic-api-key |
.travis.yml:15 | Possible generic-api-key secret in the current tree | Secrets (gitleaks) |
| low | gitleaks/generic-api-key |
examples/arduinos_and_skynet/multiple_arduinos_multiple_skynet_connections.js:9 | Possible generic-api-key secret in the current tree (test/docs/example file) | Secrets (gitleaks) |
| low | gitleaks/generic-api-key |
examples/arduinos_and_skynet/multiple_arduinos_one_skynet_connection.js:32 | Possible generic-api-key secret in the current tree (test/docs/example file) | Secrets (gitleaks) |
| low | gitleaks/generic-api-key |
examples/leap_skynet/leap_skynet.coffee:6 | Possible generic-api-key secret in history (commit 10c5e12f8d); removed from the current tree but still retrievable | Secrets (gitleaks) |
| low | gitleaks/generic-api-key |
examples/multi_platform/one_skynet_connection_controlling_multiple_arduinos.js:21 | Possible generic-api-key secret in history (commit 4a3fdf7fec); removed from the current tree but still retrievable | Secrets (gitleaks) |
| low | gitleaks/generic-api-key |
examples/multiple_arduinos.js:21 | Possible generic-api-key secret in history (commit 4a3fdf7fec); removed from the current tree but still retrievable | Secrets (gitleaks) |
| low | gitleaks/generic-api-key |
examples/pure-skynet.js:5 | Possible generic-api-key secret in history (commit 4a3fdf7fec); removed from the current tree but still retrievable | Secrets (gitleaks) |
| low | gitleaks/generic-api-key |
examples/skynet/skynet-blink.coffee:6 | Possible generic-api-key secret in history (commit 10c5e12f8d); removed from the current tree but still retrievable | Secrets (gitleaks) |
| low | gitleaks/generic-api-key |
examples/skynet/skynet-blink.js:12 | Possible generic-api-key secret in the current tree (test/docs/example file) | Secrets (gitleaks) |
| low | gitleaks/generic-api-key |
examples/skynet/skynet-blink.litcoffee:15 | Possible generic-api-key secret in history (commit 29101a2890); removed from the current tree but still retrievable | Secrets (gitleaks) |
| low | gitleaks/generic-api-key |
examples/skynet/skynet-blink.markdown:19 | Possible generic-api-key secret in the current tree (test/docs/example file) | Secrets (gitleaks) |
Tools and coverage
Every analyzer that ran on this commit. A failed or skipped tool is a coverage gap: its share of the score is left out and the coverage figure drops.
| Analyzer | Pillar | Status | Version | Findings | Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI tool configuration | AI provenance | ok | signatures-v1 | 0 | |
| Explicit AI attribution | AI provenance | ok | signatures-v1 | 0 | |
| Release velocity | AI provenance | ok | prov-4 | 0 | |
| Coding style | AI provenance | ok | — | 0 | |
| Commit velocity | AI provenance | ok | prov-4 | 0 | |
| Complexity (lizard) | Code quality | ok | lizard 1.25.1 | 0 | |
| Documentation | Code quality | ok | — | 0 | |
| Duplication (jscpd) | Code quality | ok | repotrust-dup-w6 | 0 | |
| Lint | Code quality | ok | opengrep 1.33.1; rules f1d2b562b414 | 3 | |
| Tests and CI | Code quality | ok | — | 0 | |
| Type safety | Code quality | skipped | — | 0 | |
| CI workflows (zizmor) | Security | skipped | — | 0 | |
| Dependencies (osv-scanner) | Security | skipped | — | 0 | |
| Release downloads | Security | ok | — | 0 | |
| Security posture | Security | ok | — | 0 | |
| Package registries | Security | ok | — | 0 | |
| Static analysis (opengrep) | Security | ok | opengrep 1.33.1; rules f1d2b562b414 | 4 | |
| OpenSSF Scorecard | Security | ok | scorecard v5.6.0 | 0 | |
| Secrets (gitleaks) | Security | ok | gitleaks 8.30.1 | 12 |
Score history
Scores from different scoring versions aren't directly comparable.
| Scored | Commit | Scoring | AI provenance | Quality | Security |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-11-14 | 0ba0301318fe | prov-5+qual-2+sec-2 | 0% | 78 | 54 |
| 2026-11-14 | 0ba0301318fe | prov-4+qual-2+sec-2 | 0% | 78 | 54 |
Full text report
- Repository: https://github.com/hybridgroup/cylon
- Commit:
0ba0301318fefd337900a121dffef500ca453a09 - Generated: 2026-11-14T14:52:05+00:00
- Scorer 0.1.0, scoring prov-5+qual-2+sec-2, report schema v2
Scores
| Pillar | Score | Signal | Confidence | Coverage |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI provenance (estimated AI-generated share) | 0 | none-detected | 65% | 100% |
| Code quality | 78 | adequate | 90% | 100% |
| Security | 54 | weak | 85% | 100% |
AI provenance
No AI attribution or AI-consistent velocity signals detected.
- Explicitly attributed share (lower bound): 0.0%
- Unattributed share in AI-consistent velocity bursts: 0.0%
- Estimated AI-generated share: 0.0%
| Month | Lines added | Attributed to AI |
|---|---|---|
| 2015-01 | 524 | 0% |
| 2015-02 | 950 | 0% |
| 2015-03 | 316 | 0% |
| 2015-04 | 364 | 0% |
| 2015-05 | 31 | 0% |
| 2015-06 | 1,330 | 0% |
| 2015-07 | 207 | 0% |
| 2015-09 | 231 | 0% |
| 2016-02 | 5 | 0% |
| 2016-03 | 30 | 0% |
| 2016-05 | 1 | 0% |
| 2016-07 | 17 | 0% |
AI provenance describes how code was produced; it is not a quality judgment. Unless attribution is explicit, these are signals consistent with AI generation, not proof. Squash/rebase workflows, imported code, and rewritten history reduce accuracy.
Code quality
Code quality is adequate: test-to-source ratio 0.85, CI runs tests; 4% of function code in complex or long functions; 6% duplicated lines. Weakest area: process.
| Area | Score |
|---|---|
| Complexity (lizard) | 88 |
| Duplication | 69 |
| Code smells (Opengrep) | 85 |
| Tests and CI | 90 |
| Documentation | 100 |
| Type safety | n/a |
| Process (Scorecard review/maintenance) | 5 |
- Functions: 288; mean complexity 1.9, 90th percentile 4; 1 complex and 0 long functions
- Duplicated lines: 6.1% of 2,082 compared
- Tests: 2,966 test lines for 3,502 source lines (ratio 0.85); CI test commands: make ci; 49% of recent source commits also change tests
- Docs missing or thin: none
Most complex functions:
Security
Security posture is weak: 0 possible secret(s) in the tree, 1 only in history. Weakest area: posture.
| Area | Score |
|---|---|
| Secrets (gitleaks, tree + history) | 59 |
| Static analysis (Opengrep) | 90 |
| Vulnerable dependencies (OSV) | n/a |
| CI workflows (zizmor) | n/a |
| Posture (policy, updates, signing, lockfiles) | 0 |
| OpenSSF Scorecard | 25 |
- Posture checks passed: none; missing: security policy, dependency updates, signed commits, lockfiles
- OpenSSF Scorecard aggregate: 2.1/10 (published 2026-11-09)
Top findings
| Severity | Finding | Location |
|---|---|---|
| medium | gitleaks/private-key: Possible private-key secret in history (commit ea022d3880); removed from the current tree but still retrievable |
lib/ssl/server.key:1 |
| medium | opengrep/javascript.lang.security.audit.detect-non-literal-require: Detected the use of require(variable). Calling require with a non-literal argument might allow an attacker to load and run arbitrary code, or access arbitrary files. [confidence low] |
lib/api.js:32 |
| medium | opengrep/javascript.lang.security.audit.unsafe-dynamic-method: Using non-static data to retrieve and run functions from the object is dangerous. If the data is user-controlled, it may allow executing arbitrary code. [confidence low] |
lib/initializer.js:31 |
| medium | opengrep/javascript.lang.security.audit.unsafe-dynamic-method: Using non-static data to retrieve and run functions from the object is dangerous. If the data is user-controlled, it may allow executing arbitrary code. [confidence low] |
lib/initializer.js:44 |
| medium | opengrep/javascript.lang.security.audit.detect-non-literal-require: Detected the use of require(variable). Calling require with a non-literal argument might allow an attacker to load and run arbitrary code, or access arbitrary files. [confidence low] |
lib/registry.js:37 |
| low | gitleaks/generic-api-key: Possible generic-api-key secret in the current tree (test/docs/example file) |
examples/skynet/skynet-blink.js:12 |
| low | gitleaks/generic-api-key: Possible generic-api-key secret in the current tree (test/docs/example file) |
examples/arduinos_and_skynet/multiple_arduinos_one_skynet_connection.js:32 |
| low | gitleaks/generic-api-key: Possible generic-api-key secret in the current tree (test/docs/example file) |
examples/skynet/skynet-blink.markdown:19 |
| low | gitleaks/generic-api-key: Possible generic-api-key secret in the current tree |
.travis.yml:15 |
| low | gitleaks/generic-api-key: Possible generic-api-key secret in the current tree (test/docs/example file) |
examples/arduinos_and_skynet/multiple_arduinos_multiple_skynet_connections.js:9 |
| low | gitleaks/generic-api-key: Possible generic-api-key secret in history (commit 4a3fdf7fec); removed from the current tree but still retrievable |
examples/multi_platform/one_skynet_connection_controlling_multiple_arduinos.js:21 |
| low | gitleaks/generic-api-key: Possible generic-api-key secret in history (commit 4a3fdf7fec); removed from the current tree but still retrievable |
examples/multiple_arduinos.js:21 |
| low | gitleaks/generic-api-key: Possible generic-api-key secret in history (commit 4a3fdf7fec); removed from the current tree but still retrievable |
examples/pure-skynet.js:5 |
| low | gitleaks/generic-api-key: Possible generic-api-key secret in history (commit 10c5e12f8d); removed from the current tree but still retrievable |
examples/skynet/skynet-blink.coffee:6 |
| low | gitleaks/generic-api-key: Possible generic-api-key secret in history (commit 10c5e12f8d); removed from the current tree but still retrievable |
examples/leap_skynet/leap_skynet.coffee:6 |
| low | gitleaks/generic-api-key: Possible generic-api-key secret in history (commit 29101a2890); removed from the current tree but still retrievable |
examples/skynet/skynet-blink.litcoffee:15 |
Static signals only: the scorer never runs the project's code. Secret findings are pattern matches that were not verified, and secret values are never stored.
Repository profile
- Source lines: 3,502; test lines: 2,966
| Language | Lines |
|---|---|
| JavaScript | 6,468 |