RepoTrust

Leaderboard github.com

hugeterry/CoordinatorTabLayout

Combination of TabLayout and CoordinatorLayout./TabLayout和CoordinatorLayout相结合的折叠控件

  • View repository ↗
  • Java
  • ★ 4,173
  • commit c565332bcf94
  • scored 2026-11-14
  • scoring prov-5+qual-2+sec-2

AI provenance

0%

none-detected

Confidence
58%
Coverage
100%

Estimated share of AI-generated code. Explicit attribution is a lower bound.

Code quality

66/100

adequate

Confidence
90%
Coverage
100%

Complexity, duplication, lint density, tests, CI, docs and review process.

Security

73/100

adequate

Confidence
85%
Coverage
100%

Secrets, static analysis, vulnerable dependencies, CI and supply-chain posture.

AI provenance

0% none-detected

No AI attribution or AI-consistent velocity signals detected.

How the score is built

  • Explicitly attributed share0%
  • Unattributed share in AI-pace bursts0%
  • Estimated AI-generated share0%
  • AI tool configuration files0
  • Work sessions at AI pace0
  • Releases at AI pacenot measured
  • Coding-style index (1.0+ means possible)0.00

Lines added per month all AI-attributed share

  1. 2017-0138,227 · 0% AI
  2. 2017-0214,018 · 0% AI
  3. 2017-040 · 0% AI
  4. 2017-060 · 0% AI
  5. 2017-0711,834 · 0% AI
  6. 2017-0855 · 0% AI
  7. 2017-097 · 0% AI
  8. 2017-1049 · 0% AI
  9. 2017-1251 · 0% AI
  10. 2018-011 · 0% AI

Evidence by analyzer

Explicit AI attributionok
attributed_commit_share
0.0%
attributed_commits
0
attributed_loc
0
attributed_loc_share
0.0%
commits
74
effective_loc
64,242
tools_detected
0
AI tool configurationok
artifacts
0
tools_configured
0
workflow_agents
0
Commit velocityok
excluded_import_loc
18,716
flagged_loc
0
flagged_loc_share
0.0%
flagged_units
0
max_loc_per_hour
3,408.72
measured_loc
45,526
median_loc_per_hour
566.50
pr_timed_units
0
pre_ai_era_burst_loc
43,447
pre_ai_era_bursts
5
pre_ai_era_measured_loc
45,526
work_units
31
Release velocityskipped
Coding styleok
count:assistant_voice
0
count:emoji_in_code
0
count:narrated_steps
0
count:placeholder
0
files:assistant_voice
0
files:emoji_in_code
0
files:narrated_steps
0
files:placeholder
0
index
0
lines_scanned
739
per_kloc:assistant_voice
0
per_kloc:emoji_in_code
0
per_kloc:narrated_steps
0
per_kloc:placeholder
0

Code quality

66 adequate

Code quality is adequate: test-to-source ratio 0.12, no CI test run detected; 0% of function code in complex or long functions; 17% duplicated lines. Weakest area: testing.

How the score is built

  • Complexity100
  • Duplication37
  • Lint and smells100
  • Tests and CI36
  • Documentation65
  • Type safetynot measured
  • Review processnot measured

Evidence by analyzer

Complexity (lizard)ok
complex_functions
0
function_nloc
377
functions
52
long_functions
0
many_param_functions
0
mean_ccn
1.60
p90_ccn
3
risky_nloc_share
0.0%
Duplication (jscpd)ok1 item
compared_lines
399
duplicated_lines
66
duplicated_share
16.5%
files
10
Lintok
findings
0
scanned_lines
739
weighted_findings
0
Tests and CIok
check:ci_present
no
check:ci_runs_lint
no
check:ci_runs_tests
no
check:has_tests
yes
check:test_ratio
no
check:tests_cochange
yes
ci_files
0
cochange_commits
42
cochange_share
30.9%
source_lines
739
test_lines
86
test_ratio
0.12
Documentationok2 items
  • README.md README.md
  • LICENSE.txt LICENSE.txt
check:changelog
no
check:contributing
no
check:license
yes
check:readme
yes
readme_lines
159
Type safetyskipped

Security

73 adequate

Security posture is adequate: no high-impact findings. Weakest area: posture.

How the score is built

  • Secrets97
  • Static analysis (SAST)81
  • Vulnerable dependenciesnot measured
  • CI workflowsnot measured
  • Security posture0
  • OpenSSF Scorecardnot measured

Evidence by analyzer

OpenSSF Scorecardskipped

no published OpenSSF Scorecard result for this repo

Package registriesskipped

no registry dependencies declared

Secrets (gitleaks)ok
secrets_current
0
secrets_history
0
secrets_low_confidence
1
secrets_nonprod
0
Static analysis (opengrep)ok
findings
1
findings_high
0
findings_low
0
findings_medium
1
parse_errors
0
scanned_lines
739
weighted_findings
0.60
Dependencies (osv-scanner)skipped
CI workflows (zizmor)skipped
Security postureok
check:dependency_updates
no
check:lockfiles
yes
check:security_policy
no
check:signed_commits
no
signed_commit_share
0.0%
unpinned_manifests
0
Release downloadsok
binary_assets
0
signals
0
suspicious
0

Findings

1 medium1 low

SeverityRuleLocationMessageTool
medium opengrep/java.android.security.exported_activity sample/src/main/AndroidManifest.xml:13 The application exports an activity. Any application on the device can launch the exported activity which may compromise the integrity of your application or its data. Ensure that any exported activities do not have privileged access... Static analysis (opengrep)
low gitleaks/generic-api-key local.properties:14 Possible generic-api-key secret in history (commit b222019385); removed from the current tree but still retrievable Secrets (gitleaks)

Tools and coverage

Every analyzer that ran on this commit. A failed or skipped tool is a coverage gap: its share of the score is left out and the coverage figure drops.

AnalyzerPillarStatusVersionFindingsNote
AI tool configurationAI provenanceoksignatures-v10
Explicit AI attributionAI provenanceoksignatures-v10
Release velocityAI provenanceskipped—0
Coding styleAI provenanceok—0
Commit velocityAI provenanceokprov-40
Complexity (lizard)Code qualityoklizard 1.25.10
DocumentationCode qualityok—0
Duplication (jscpd)Code qualityokrepotrust-dup-w60
LintCode qualityokopengrep 1.33.1; rules f1d2b562b4140
Tests and CICode qualityok—0
Type safetyCode qualityskipped—0
CI workflows (zizmor)Securityskipped—0
Dependencies (osv-scanner)Securityskipped—0
Release downloadsSecurityok—0
Security postureSecurityok—0
Package registriesSecurityskipped—0no registry dependencies declared
Static analysis (opengrep)Securityokopengrep 1.33.1; rules f1d2b562b4141
OpenSSF ScorecardSecurityskipped—0no published OpenSSF Scorecard result for this repo
Secrets (gitleaks)Securityokgitleaks 8.30.11

Score history

Scores from different scoring versions aren't directly comparable.

ScoredCommitScoringAI provenanceQualitySecurity
2026-11-14c565332bcf94prov-5+qual-2+sec-20%6673
2026-11-14c565332bcf94prov-4+qual-2+sec-20%6673

Embed a badge

Maintainers can show these in a README. Badges update when the repository is re-scored.

[![RepoTrust ai](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/badge/github.com/hugeterry/CoordinatorTabLayout/ai.svg)](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/r/github.com/hugeterry/CoordinatorTabLayout/)
[![RepoTrust quality](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/badge/github.com/hugeterry/CoordinatorTabLayout/quality.svg)](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/r/github.com/hugeterry/CoordinatorTabLayout/)
[![RepoTrust security](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/badge/github.com/hugeterry/CoordinatorTabLayout/security.svg)](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/r/github.com/hugeterry/CoordinatorTabLayout/)
Full text report

Scores

Pillar Score Signal Confidence Coverage
AI provenance (estimated AI-generated share) 0 none-detected 58% 100%
Code quality 66 adequate 90% 100%
Security 73 adequate 85% 100%

AI provenance

No AI attribution or AI-consistent velocity signals detected.

  • Explicitly attributed share (lower bound): 0.0%
  • Unattributed share in AI-consistent velocity bursts: 0.0%
  • Estimated AI-generated share: 0.0%
Month Lines added Attributed to AI
2017-01 38,227 0%
2017-02 14,018 0%
2017-07 11,834 0%
2017-08 55 0%
2017-09 7 0%
2017-10 49 0%
2017-12 51 0%
2018-01 1 0%

AI provenance describes how code was produced; it is not a quality judgment. Unless attribution is explicit, these are signals consistent with AI generation, not proof. Squash/rebase workflows, imported code, and rewritten history reduce accuracy.

Code quality

Code quality is adequate: test-to-source ratio 0.12, no CI test run detected; 0% of function code in complex or long functions; 17% duplicated lines. Weakest area: testing.

Area Score
Complexity (lizard) 100
Duplication 37
Code smells (Opengrep) 100
Tests and CI 36
Documentation 65
Type safety n/a
Process (Scorecard review/maintenance) n/a
  • Functions: 52; mean complexity 1.6, 90th percentile 3; 0 complex and 0 long functions
  • Duplicated lines: 16.5% of 399 compared
  • Tests: 86 test lines for 739 source lines (ratio 0.12); CI test commands: none detected; 31% of recent source commits also change tests
  • Docs missing or thin: contributing, changelog

Security

Security posture is adequate: no high-impact findings. Weakest area: posture.

Area Score
Secrets (gitleaks, tree + history) 97
Static analysis (Opengrep) 81
Vulnerable dependencies (OSV) n/a
CI workflows (zizmor) n/a
Posture (policy, updates, signing, lockfiles) 0
OpenSSF Scorecard n/a
  • Posture checks passed: lockfiles; missing: security policy, dependency updates, signed commits

Top findings

Severity Finding Location
medium opengrep/java.android.security.exported_activity: The application exports an activity. Any application on the device can launch the exported activity which may compromise the integrity of your application or its data. Ensure that any exported activities do not have privileged access to your application's control plane. [confidence medium] sample/src/main/AndroidManifest.xml:13
low gitleaks/generic-api-key: Possible generic-api-key secret in history (commit b222019385); removed from the current tree but still retrievable local.properties:14

Static signals only: the scorer never runs the project's code. Secret findings are pattern matches that were not verified, and secret values are never stored.

Repository profile

  • Source lines: 739; test lines: 86
Language Lines
Java 825