Leaderboard github.com
grantland/android-autofittextview
A TextView that automatically resizes text to fit perfectly within its bounds.
AI provenance
0%
none-detected
- Confidence
- 54%
- Coverage
- 100%
Estimated share of AI-generated code. Explicit attribution is a lower bound.
Code quality
48/100
poor
- Confidence
- 90%
- Coverage
- 100%
Complexity, duplication, lint density, tests, CI, docs and review process.
Security
66/100
weak
- Confidence
- 85%
- Coverage
- 100%
Secrets, static analysis, vulnerable dependencies, CI and supply-chain posture.
AI provenance
0% none-detected
No AI attribution or AI-consistent velocity signals detected.
How the score is built
- Explicitly attributed share0%
- Unattributed share in AI-pace bursts0%
- Estimated AI-generated share0%
- AI tool configuration files0
- Work sessions at AI pace0
- Releases at AI pace0
- Coding-style index (1.0+ means possible)0.00
Lines added per month all AI-attributed share
- 2011-02158 · 0% AI
- 2012-06162 · 0% AI
- 2012-0715 · 0% AI
- 2014-02105 · 0% AI
- 2014-03211 · 0% AI
- 2014-041 · 0% AI
- 2014-06758 · 0% AI
- 2014-080 · 0% AI
- 2014-120 · 0% AI
- 2015-0132 · 0% AI
- 2015-030 · 0% AI
- 2015-090 · 0% AI
- 2016-040 · 0% AI
Evidence by analyzer
Explicit AI attributionok
- attributed_commit_share
- 0.0%
- attributed_commits
- 0
- attributed_loc
- 0
- attributed_loc_share
- 0.0%
- commits
- 56
- effective_loc
- 1,442
- tools_detected
- 0
AI tool configurationok
- artifacts
- 0
- tools_configured
- 0
- workflow_agents
- 0
Commit velocityok
- excluded_import_loc
- 0
- flagged_loc
- 0
- flagged_loc_share
- 0.0%
- flagged_units
- 0
- max_loc_per_hour
- 156.50
- measured_loc
- 1,442
- median_loc_per_hour
- 36.98
- pr_timed_units
- 0
- pre_ai_era_burst_loc
- 0
- pre_ai_era_bursts
- 0
- pre_ai_era_measured_loc
- 1,442
- work_units
- 16
Release velocityok
- flagged_releases
- 0
- max_loc_per_day
- 224.90
- releases
- 3
Coding styleok
- count:assistant_voice
- 0
- count:emoji_in_code
- 0
- count:narrated_steps
- 0
- count:placeholder
- 0
- files:assistant_voice
- 0
- files:emoji_in_code
- 0
- files:narrated_steps
- 0
- files:placeholder
- 0
- index
- 0
- lines_scanned
- 882
- per_kloc:assistant_voice
- 0
- per_kloc:emoji_in_code
- 0
- per_kloc:narrated_steps
- 0
- per_kloc:placeholder
- 0
Code quality
48 poor
Code quality is poor: test-to-source ratio 0.00, no CI test run detected; 0% of function code in complex or long functions; 4% duplicated lines. Weakest area: testing.
How the score is built
- Complexity100
- Duplication80
- Lint and smells47
- Tests and CI0
- Documentation65
- Type safetynot measured
- Review process5
Evidence by analyzer
Complexity (lizard)ok
- complex_functions
- 0
- function_nloc
- 435
- functions
- 65
- long_functions
- 0
- many_param_functions
- 2
- mean_ccn
- 1.71
- p90_ccn
- 3
- risky_nloc_share
- 0.0%
Duplication (jscpd)ok1 item
- compared_lines
- 483
- duplicated_lines
- 18
- duplicated_share
- 3.7%
- files
- 4
Lintok
- category:correctness
- 1
- findings
- 1
- scanned_lines
- 882
- weighted_findings
- 3
Tests and CIok
- check:ci_present
- no
- check:ci_runs_lint
- no
- check:ci_runs_tests
- no
- check:has_tests
- no
- check:test_ratio
- no
- check:tests_cochange
- no
- ci_files
- 0
- cochange_commits
- 28
- cochange_share
- 0.0%
- source_lines
- 882
- test_lines
- 0
- test_ratio
- 0
Documentationok2 items
- README.md
README.md - LICENSE.txt
LICENSE.txt
- check:changelog
- no
- check:contributing
- no
- check:license
- yes
- check:readme
- yes
- readme_lines
- 54
Type safetyskipped
Security
66 weak
Security posture is weak: no high-impact findings. Weakest area: posture.
How the score is built
- Secrets100
- Static analysis (SAST)81
- Vulnerable dependenciesnot measured
- CI workflowsnot measured
- Security posture0
- OpenSSF Scorecard20
Evidence by analyzer
OpenSSF Scorecardok9 items
- Scorecard Code-Review: 1/10 (Found 4/26 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1)
- Scorecard Maintained: 0/10 (0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0)
- Scorecard Binary-Artifacts: 8/10 (binaries present in source code)
- Scorecard CII-Best-Practices: 0/10 (no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected)
- Scorecard Fuzzing: 0/10 (project is not fuzzed)
- Scorecard Security-Policy: 0/10 (security policy file not detected)
- Scorecard License: 10/10 (license file detected)
- Scorecard Branch-Protection: 0/10 (branch protection not enabled on development/release branches)
- Scorecard SAST: 0/10 (SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0)
- aggregate
- 1.90
- check:Binary-Artifacts
- yes
- check:Branch-Protection
- no
- check:CII-Best-Practices
- no
- check:Code-Review
- yes
- check:Fuzzing
- no
- check:License
- yes
- check:Maintained
- no
- check:SAST
- no
- check:Security-Policy
- no
Package registriesskipped
no registry dependencies declared
Secrets (gitleaks)ok
- secrets_current
- 0
- secrets_history
- 0
- secrets_low_confidence
- 0
- secrets_nonprod
- 0
Static analysis (opengrep)ok
- findings
- 1
- findings_high
- 0
- findings_low
- 0
- findings_medium
- 1
- parse_errors
- 0
- scanned_lines
- 882
- weighted_findings
- 0.60
Dependencies (osv-scanner)skipped
CI workflows (zizmor)skipped
Security postureok
- check:dependency_updates
- no
- check:lockfiles
- yes
- check:security_policy
- no
- check:signed_commits
- no
- signed_commit_share
- 0.0%
- unpinned_manifests
- 0
Release downloadsok
- binary_assets
- 0
- signals
- 0
- suspicious
- 0
Findings
1 high1 medium
| Severity | Rule | Location | Message | Tool |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| high | opengrep/java.lang.correctness.hardcoded-conditional |
library/src/main/java/me/grantland/widget/AutofitHelper.java:157 | This if statement will always have the same behavior and is therefore unnecessary. | Lint |
| medium | opengrep/java.android.security.exported_activity |
sample/src/main/AndroidManifest.xml:12 | The application exports an activity. Any application on the device can launch the exported activity which may compromise the integrity of your application or its data. Ensure that any exported activities do not have privileged access... | Static analysis (opengrep) |
Tools and coverage
Every analyzer that ran on this commit. A failed or skipped tool is a coverage gap: its share of the score is left out and the coverage figure drops.
| Analyzer | Pillar | Status | Version | Findings | Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI tool configuration | AI provenance | ok | signatures-v1 | 0 | |
| Explicit AI attribution | AI provenance | ok | signatures-v1 | 0 | |
| Release velocity | AI provenance | ok | prov-4 | 0 | |
| Coding style | AI provenance | ok | — | 0 | |
| Commit velocity | AI provenance | ok | prov-4 | 0 | |
| Complexity (lizard) | Code quality | ok | lizard 1.25.1 | 0 | |
| Documentation | Code quality | ok | — | 0 | |
| Duplication (jscpd) | Code quality | ok | repotrust-dup-w6 | 0 | |
| Lint | Code quality | ok | opengrep 1.33.1; rules f1d2b562b414 | 1 | |
| Tests and CI | Code quality | ok | — | 0 | |
| Type safety | Code quality | skipped | — | 0 | |
| CI workflows (zizmor) | Security | skipped | — | 0 | |
| Dependencies (osv-scanner) | Security | skipped | — | 0 | |
| Release downloads | Security | ok | — | 0 | |
| Security posture | Security | ok | — | 0 | |
| Package registries | Security | skipped | — | 0 | no registry dependencies declared |
| Static analysis (opengrep) | Security | ok | opengrep 1.33.1; rules f1d2b562b414 | 1 | |
| OpenSSF Scorecard | Security | ok | scorecard v5.6.0 | 0 | |
| Secrets (gitleaks) | Security | ok | gitleaks 8.30.1 | 0 |
Score history
Scores from different scoring versions aren't directly comparable.
| Scored | Commit | Scoring | AI provenance | Quality | Security |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-11-14 | 5c565aa5c3ed | prov-5+qual-2+sec-2 | 0% | 48 | 66 |
| 2026-11-14 | 5c565aa5c3ed | prov-4+qual-2+sec-2 | 0% | 48 | 66 |
Full text report
- Repository: https://github.com/grantland/android-autofittextview
- Commit:
5c565aa5c3ed62aaa31140440bb526e7435e7947 - Generated: 2026-11-14T14:52:04+00:00
- Scorer 0.1.0, scoring prov-5+qual-2+sec-2, report schema v2
Scores
| Pillar | Score | Signal | Confidence | Coverage |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI provenance (estimated AI-generated share) | 0 | none-detected | 54% | 100% |
| Code quality | 48 | poor | 90% | 100% |
| Security | 66 | weak | 85% | 100% |
AI provenance
No AI attribution or AI-consistent velocity signals detected.
- Explicitly attributed share (lower bound): 0.0%
- Unattributed share in AI-consistent velocity bursts: 0.0%
- Estimated AI-generated share: 0.0%
| Month | Lines added | Attributed to AI |
|---|---|---|
| 2011-02 | 158 | 0% |
| 2012-06 | 162 | 0% |
| 2012-07 | 15 | 0% |
| 2014-02 | 105 | 0% |
| 2014-03 | 211 | 0% |
| 2014-04 | 1 | 0% |
| 2014-06 | 758 | 0% |
| 2015-01 | 32 | 0% |
AI provenance describes how code was produced; it is not a quality judgment. Unless attribution is explicit, these are signals consistent with AI generation, not proof. Squash/rebase workflows, imported code, and rewritten history reduce accuracy.
Code quality
Code quality is poor: test-to-source ratio 0.00, no CI test run detected; 0% of function code in complex or long functions; 4% duplicated lines. Weakest area: testing.
| Area | Score |
|---|---|
| Complexity (lizard) | 100 |
| Duplication | 80 |
| Code smells (Opengrep) | 47 |
| Tests and CI | 0 |
| Documentation | 65 |
| Type safety | n/a |
| Process (Scorecard review/maintenance) | 5 |
- Functions: 65; mean complexity 1.7, 90th percentile 3; 0 complex and 0 long functions
- Duplicated lines: 3.7% of 483 compared
- Tests: 0 test lines for 882 source lines (ratio 0.00); CI test commands: none detected; 0% of recent source commits also change tests
- Docs missing or thin: contributing, changelog
Security
Security posture is weak: no high-impact findings. Weakest area: posture.
| Area | Score |
|---|---|
| Secrets (gitleaks, tree + history) | 100 |
| Static analysis (Opengrep) | 81 |
| Vulnerable dependencies (OSV) | n/a |
| CI workflows (zizmor) | n/a |
| Posture (policy, updates, signing, lockfiles) | 0 |
| OpenSSF Scorecard | 20 |
- Posture checks passed: lockfiles; missing: security policy, dependency updates, signed commits
- OpenSSF Scorecard aggregate: 1.9/10 (published 2026-10-26)
Top findings
| Severity | Finding | Location |
|---|---|---|
| medium | opengrep/java.android.security.exported_activity: The application exports an activity. Any application on the device can launch the exported activity which may compromise the integrity of your application or its data. Ensure that any exported activities do not have privileged access to your application's control plane. [confidence medium] |
sample/src/main/AndroidManifest.xml:12 |
Static signals only: the scorer never runs the project's code. Secret findings are pattern matches that were not verified, and secret values are never stored.
Repository profile
- Source lines: 882; test lines: 0
| Language | Lines |
|---|---|
| Java | 882 |