gmegidish/sshdoom
- Repository: https://github.com/gmegidish/sshdoom
- Commit:
36267bee73e2304d32c7276e43adab28f614d355 - Generated: 2026-11-13T23:58:22+00:00
- Scorer 0.1.0, scoring prov-4+qual-2+sec-2, report schema v2
Scores
| Pillar | Score | Signal | Confidence | Coverage |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI provenance (estimated AI-generated share) | 0 | none-detected | 47% | 100% |
| Code quality | 63 | weak | 90% | 100% |
| Security | 63 | weak | 85% | 100% |
AI provenance
No AI attribution or AI-consistent velocity signals detected.
-
Explicitly attributed share (lower bound): 0.0%
-
Unattributed share in AI-consistent velocity bursts: 0.0%
-
Estimated AI-generated share: 0.0%
-
Stylometry index: 0.50 per 1,000 lines (narrated steps 0, placeholders 0, assistant phrasing 0, emoji 1). Reported as a signal, not scored.
| Month | Lines added | Attributed to AI |
|---|---|---|
| 2025-08 | 408 | 0% |
AI provenance describes how code was produced; it is not a quality judgment. Unless attribution is explicit, these are signals consistent with AI generation, not proof. Squash/rebase workflows, imported code, and rewritten history reduce accuracy.
Code quality
Code quality is weak: test-to-source ratio 0.00, no CI test run detected; 14% of function code in complex or long functions; 0% duplicated lines. Weakest area: testing.
| Area | Score |
|---|---|
| Complexity (lizard) | 66 |
| Duplication | 100 |
| Code smells (Opengrep) | 100 |
| Tests and CI | 15 |
| Documentation | 65 |
| Type safety | n/a |
| Process (Scorecard review/maintenance) | n/a |
- Functions: 15; mean complexity 4.1, 90th percentile 13; 1 complex and 0 long functions
- Duplicated lines: 0.0% of 242 compared
- Tests: 0 test lines for 363 source lines (ratio 0.00); CI test commands: none detected; 0% of recent source commits also change tests
- Docs missing or thin: contributing, changelog
Most complex functions:
Security
Security posture is weak: 1 high-severity SAST findings; 4 high-severity workflow issues. Weakest area: posture.
| Area | Score |
|---|---|
| Secrets (gitleaks, tree + history) | 100 |
| Static analysis (Opengrep) | 53 |
| Vulnerable dependencies (OSV) | n/a |
| CI workflows (zizmor) | 42 |
| Posture (policy, updates, signing, lockfiles) | 20 |
| OpenSSF Scorecard | n/a |
- Posture checks passed: signed commits, lockfiles; missing: security policy, dependency updates
Top findings
| Severity | Finding | Location |
|---|---|---|
| high | opengrep/dockerfile.security.missing-user: By not specifying a USER, a program in the container may run as 'root'. This is a security hazard. If an attacker can control a process running as root, they may have control over the container. Ensure that the last USER in a Dockerfile is a USER other than 'root'. [confidence medium] |
Dockerfile:22 |
| high | zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] |
.github/workflows/publish.yml:15 |
| high | zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] |
.github/workflows/publish.yml:20 |
| high | zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] |
.github/workflows/publish.yml:26 |
| high | zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] |
.github/workflows/publish.yml:29 |
| medium | zizmor/artipacked: credential persistence through GitHub Actions artifacts [confidence low] |
.github/workflows/publish.yml:14 |
| medium | zizmor/excessive-permissions: overly broad permissions [confidence medium] |
.github/workflows/publish.yml:10 |
Static signals only: the scorer never runs the project's code. Secret findings are pattern matches that were not verified, and secret values are never stored.
Repository profile
- Source lines: 363; test lines: 0
| Language | Lines |
|---|---|
| C | 363 |