Leaderboard github.com
gitman-101111/gelatinarm
A native Xbox media client for Jellyfin servers; this is unofficial and has no affiliation with the Jellyfin project in any way
AI provenance
2%
explicit
- Confidence
- 79%
- Coverage
- 100%
Estimated share of AI-generated code. Explicit attribution is a lower bound.
Code quality
65/100
adequate
- Confidence
- 90%
- Coverage
- 100%
Complexity, duplication, lint density, tests, CI, docs and review process.
Security
81/100
adequate
- Confidence
- 85%
- Coverage
- 100%
Secrets, static analysis, vulnerable dependencies, CI and supply-chain posture.
AI provenance
2% explicit
Explicit AI attribution on 2% of first-party code added; an estimated 2% including velocity signals.
How the score is built
- Explicitly attributed share2%
- Unattributed share in AI-pace bursts4%
- Estimated AI-generated share2%
- AI tool configuration files0
- Work sessions at AI pace1
- Releases at AI pace0
- Coding-style index (1.0+ means possible)0.05
Attributed AI tools
| Tool | Commits | Lines added | First seen | Last seen |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Code | 3 | 2,209 | 2025-09-02 | 2025-09-26 |
Lines added per month all AI-attributed share
- 2025-0842,386 · 0% AI
- 2025-092,250 · 98% AI
- 2025-1211,292 · 0% AI
- 2026-014,342 · 0% AI
- 2026-051,512 · 0% AI
- 2026-067,982 · 0% AI
- 2026-073 · 0% AI
- 2026-0925,850 · 0% AI
- 2026-102,714 · 0% AI
Findings in AI-attributed lines vs the rest
From git blame: 2 lines trace to AI-attributed commits, 29,463 to others. Too few lines in one group for a fair comparison. Reported, not scored.
| Findings per 1,000 lines | AI-attributed | Other | Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|
| Code quality | 0.00 | 0.00 | — |
| Security | 0.00 | 0.00 | — |
Evidence by analyzer
Explicit AI attributionok4 items
- Claude Code: 3 attributed commits, 2,209 lines added
- Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude'
- Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude'
- Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude'
- attributed_commit_share
- 8.1%
- attributed_commits
- 3
- attributed_loc
- 2,209
- attributed_loc_share
- 2.2%
- commits
- 37
- effective_loc
- 98,331
- tools_detected
- 1
AI tool configurationok
- artifacts
- 0
- tools_configured
- 0
- workflow_agents
- 0
Commit velocityok1 item
- excluded_import_loc
- 85,723
- flagged_loc
- 4,342
- flagged_loc_share
- 34.4%
- flagged_units
- 1
- max_loc_per_hour
- 1,076.16
- measured_loc
- 12,608
- median_loc_per_hour
- 190.39
- pr_timed_units
- 0
- pre_ai_era_burst_loc
- 0
- pre_ai_era_bursts
- 0
- pre_ai_era_measured_loc
- 0
- work_units
- 18
Release velocityok
- flagged_releases
- 0
- max_loc_per_day
- 419.70
- releases
- 12
Coding styleok
- count:assistant_voice
- 0
- count:emoji_in_code
- 3
- count:narrated_steps
- 0
- count:placeholder
- 0
- files:assistant_voice
- 0
- files:emoji_in_code
- 1
- files:narrated_steps
- 0
- files:placeholder
- 0
- index
- 0.05
- lines_scanned
- 29,465
- per_kloc:assistant_voice
- 0
- per_kloc:emoji_in_code
- 0.10
- per_kloc:narrated_steps
- 0
- per_kloc:placeholder
- 0
Findings in AI-written linesok
- ai_lines
- 2
- blame_failures
- 0
- files_blamed
- 159
- other_lines
- 29,463
- quality:ai_findings
- 0
- quality:ai_per_kloc
- 0
- quality:other_findings
- 0
- quality:other_per_kloc
- 0
- security:ai_findings
- 0
- security:ai_per_kloc
- 0
- security:other_findings
- 0
- security:other_per_kloc
- 0
Code quality
65 adequate
Code quality is adequate: test-to-source ratio 0.00, no CI test run detected; 14% of function code in complex or long functions; 1% duplicated lines. Weakest area: testing.
How the score is built
- Complexity66
- Duplication97
- Lint and smells100
- Tests and CI25
- Documentation65
- Type safetynot measured
- Review processnot measured
Evidence by analyzer
Complexity (lizard)ok10 items
- References::Classify in Gelatinarm.Analyzers/References.cs: complexity 39, 70 lines
- SyntaxRulesAnalyzer::AnalyzeToolkitShapes in Gelatinarm.Analyzers/SyntaxRulesAnalyzer.cs: complexity 38, 42 lines
- Rules::CheckMember in Gelatinarm.Analyzers/MemberRulesAnalyzer.cs: complexity 37, 59 lines
- MediaTextConverter::Convert in Shared/Ui/MediaTextConverter.cs: complexity 33, 71 lines
- App::OnLaunched in App.xaml.cs: complexity 32, 168 lines
- XamlAnalyzer::ReportSizeAgainstBounds in Gelatinarm.Analyzers/Xaml/XamlAnalyzer.cs: complexity 30, 41 lines
- DeviceProfileService::ExpectsVideoCopy in Playback/DeviceProfileService.cs: complexity 28, 24 lines
- App::App_UnhandledException in App.xaml.cs: complexity 27, 48 lines
- SyntaxRulesAnalyzer::AnalyzeCatch in Gelatinarm.Analyzers/SyntaxRulesAnalyzer.cs: complexity 27, 34 lines
- NavigationService::NavigateCore in Shared/Navigation/NavigationService.cs: complexity 26, 92 lines
- complex_functions
- 43
- function_nloc
- 18,635
- functions
- 1,210
- long_functions
- 3
- many_param_functions
- 7
- mean_ccn
- 4.09
- p90_ccn
- 9
- risky_nloc_share
- 14.0%
Duplication (jscpd)ok3 items
- 6+ duplicated lines: Details/CollectionDetailsViewModel.cs:33 and Details/PersonDetailsViewModel.cs:35
- 6+ duplicated lines: Music/AlbumDetailsViewModel.cs:33 and Music/ArtistDetailsViewModel.cs:28
- 6+ duplicated lines: Playback/DeviceProfileService.cs:373 and Playback/DeviceProfileService.cs:411
- compared_lines
- 16,239
- duplicated_lines
- 89
- duplicated_share
- 0.5%
- files
- 159
Lintok
- findings
- 0
- scanned_lines
- 29,465
- weighted_findings
- 0
Tests and CIok2 items
- CI config: .github/workflows/formatting.yml
.github/workflows/formatting.yml - CI runs linters (dotnet format)
- check:ci_present
- yes
- check:ci_runs_lint
- yes
- check:ci_runs_tests
- no
- check:has_tests
- no
- check:test_ratio
- no
- check:tests_cochange
- no
- ci_files
- 1
- cochange_commits
- 28
- cochange_share
- 0.0%
- source_lines
- 29,465
- test_lines
- 0
- test_ratio
- 0
Documentationok2 items
- README.md
README.md - LICENSE
LICENSE
- check:changelog
- no
- check:contributing
- no
- check:license
- yes
- check:readme
- yes
- readme_lines
- 290
Type safetyskipped
Security
81 adequate
Security posture is adequate: 2 high-severity workflow issues. Weakest area: posture.
How the score is built
- Secrets100
- Static analysis (SAST)100
- Vulnerable dependenciesnot measured
- CI workflows63
- Security posture20
- OpenSSF Scorecardnot measured
Evidence by analyzer
OpenSSF Scorecardskipped
no published OpenSSF Scorecard result for this repo
Package registriesskipped
no registry dependencies declared
Secrets (gitleaks)ok
- secrets_current
- 0
- secrets_history
- 0
- secrets_low_confidence
- 0
- secrets_nonprod
- 0
Static analysis (opengrep)ok
- findings
- 0
- findings_high
- 0
- findings_low
- 0
- findings_medium
- 0
- parse_errors
- 1
- scanned_lines
- 29,465
- weighted_findings
- 0
Dependencies (osv-scanner)skipped
CI workflows (zizmor)ok
- findings
- 4
- findings_high
- 2
- findings_low
- 0
- findings_medium
- 2
- penalty
- 27.60
- workflows
- 1
Security postureok
- check:dependency_updates
- no
- check:lockfiles
- yes
- check:security_policy
- no
- check:signed_commits
- yes
- signed_commit_share
- 54.0%
- unpinned_manifests
- 0
Release downloadsok
- binary_assets
- 0
- signals
- 0
- suspicious
- 0
Findings
2 high2 medium
4 findings
| Severity | Rule | Location | Message | Tool |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| high | zizmor/unpinned-uses |
.github/workflows/formatting.yml:16 | unpinned action reference [confidence high] | CI workflows (zizmor) |
| high | zizmor/unpinned-uses |
.github/workflows/formatting.yml:18 | unpinned action reference [confidence high] | CI workflows (zizmor) |
| medium | zizmor/excessive-permissions |
.github/workflows/formatting.yml:13 | overly broad permissions [confidence medium] | CI workflows (zizmor) |
| medium | zizmor/artipacked |
.github/workflows/formatting.yml:16 | credential persistence through GitHub Actions artifacts [confidence low] | CI workflows (zizmor) |
Tools and coverage
Every analyzer that ran on this commit. A failed or skipped tool is a coverage gap: its share of the score is left out and the coverage figure drops.
| Analyzer | Pillar | Status | Version | Findings | Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI tool configuration | AI provenance | ok | signatures-v1 | 0 | |
| Explicit AI attribution | AI provenance | ok | signatures-v1 | 0 | |
| Release velocity | AI provenance | ok | prov-4 | 0 | |
| Coding style | AI provenance | ok | — | 0 | |
| Commit velocity | AI provenance | ok | prov-4 | 0 | |
| Findings in AI-written lines | AI provenance | ok | git-blame | 0 | |
| Complexity (lizard) | Code quality | ok | lizard 1.25.1 | 0 | |
| Documentation | Code quality | ok | — | 0 | |
| Duplication (jscpd) | Code quality | ok | repotrust-dup-w6 | 0 | |
| Lint | Code quality | ok | opengrep 1.33.1; rules f1d2b562b414 | 0 | |
| Tests and CI | Code quality | ok | — | 0 | |
| Type safety | Code quality | skipped | — | 0 | |
| CI workflows (zizmor) | Security | ok | zizmor 1.32.0 | 4 | |
| Dependencies (osv-scanner) | Security | skipped | — | 0 | |
| Release downloads | Security | ok | — | 0 | |
| Security posture | Security | ok | — | 0 | |
| Package registries | Security | skipped | — | 0 | no registry dependencies declared |
| Static analysis (opengrep) | Security | ok | opengrep 1.33.1; rules f1d2b562b414 | 0 | |
| OpenSSF Scorecard | Security | skipped | — | 0 | no published OpenSSF Scorecard result for this repo |
| Secrets (gitleaks) | Security | ok | gitleaks 8.30.1 | 0 |
Score history
Scores from different scoring versions aren't directly comparable.
| Scored | Commit | Scoring | AI provenance | Quality | Security |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-11-14 | dbd37c2a6982 | prov-5+qual-2+sec-2 | 2% | 65 | 81 |
| 2026-11-14 | dbd37c2a6982 | prov-4+qual-2+sec-2 | 2% | 65 | 81 |
Full text report
- Repository: https://github.com/gitman-101111/gelatinarm
- Commit:
dbd37c2a6982ecb71505fc290b0d8676a7d3dc8a - Generated: 2026-11-14T14:52:04+00:00
- Scorer 0.1.0, scoring prov-5+qual-2+sec-2, report schema v2
Scores
| Pillar | Score | Signal | Confidence | Coverage |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI provenance (estimated AI-generated share) | 2 | explicit | 79% | 100% |
| Code quality | 65 | adequate | 90% | 100% |
| Security | 81 | adequate | 85% | 100% |
AI provenance
Explicit AI attribution on 2% of first-party code added; an estimated 2% including velocity signals.
- Explicitly attributed share (lower bound): 2.2%
- Unattributed share in AI-consistent velocity bursts: 4.4%
- Estimated AI-generated share: 2.2%
| AI tool | Attributed commits | Lines added |
|---|---|---|
| Claude Code | 3 | 2,209 |
Current source lines last changed by AI-attributed commits: 2 of 29,465.
Too few lines in one group to compare finding densities.
- Stylometry index: 0.05 per 1,000 lines (narrated steps 0, placeholders 0, assistant phrasing 0, emoji 3). Reported as a signal, not scored.
| Month | Lines added | Attributed to AI |
|---|---|---|
| 2025-08 | 42,386 | 0% |
| 2025-09 | 2,250 | 98% |
| 2025-12 | 11,292 | 0% |
| 2026-01 | 4,342 | 0% |
| 2026-05 | 1,512 | 0% |
| 2026-06 | 7,982 | 0% |
| 2026-07 | 3 | 0% |
| 2026-09 | 25,850 | 0% |
| 2026-10 | 2,714 | 0% |
Evidence
- Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (3fab4d6a4674)
- Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (3523f6c2a43a)
- Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (9da8c1ba3e55)
- 4,342 lines of first-party code in ~4.0h (1,076 lines/hour, 2 commit session) (8f6297bce81e)
AI provenance describes how code was produced; it is not a quality judgment. Unless attribution is explicit, these are signals consistent with AI generation, not proof. Squash/rebase workflows, imported code, and rewritten history reduce accuracy.
Code quality
Code quality is adequate: test-to-source ratio 0.00, no CI test run detected; 14% of function code in complex or long functions; 1% duplicated lines. Weakest area: testing.
| Area | Score |
|---|---|
| Complexity (lizard) | 66 |
| Duplication | 97 |
| Code smells (Opengrep) | 100 |
| Tests and CI | 25 |
| Documentation | 65 |
| Type safety | n/a |
| Process (Scorecard review/maintenance) | n/a |
- Functions: 1,210; mean complexity 4.1, 90th percentile 9; 43 complex and 3 long functions
- Duplicated lines: 0.5% of 16,239 compared
- Tests: 0 test lines for 29,465 source lines (ratio 0.00); CI test commands: none detected; 0% of recent source commits also change tests
- Docs missing or thin: contributing, changelog
Most complex functions:
- References::Classify in Gelatinarm.Analyzers/References.cs: complexity 39, 70 lines
- SyntaxRulesAnalyzer::AnalyzeToolkitShapes in Gelatinarm.Analyzers/SyntaxRulesAnalyzer.cs: complexity 38, 42 lines
- Rules::CheckMember in Gelatinarm.Analyzers/MemberRulesAnalyzer.cs: complexity 37, 59 lines
- MediaTextConverter::Convert in Shared/Ui/MediaTextConverter.cs: complexity 33, 71 lines
- App::OnLaunched in App.xaml.cs: complexity 32, 168 lines
Security
Security posture is adequate: 2 high-severity workflow issues. Weakest area: posture.
| Area | Score |
|---|---|
| Secrets (gitleaks, tree + history) | 100 |
| Static analysis (Opengrep) | 100 |
| Vulnerable dependencies (OSV) | n/a |
| CI workflows (zizmor) | 63 |
| Posture (policy, updates, signing, lockfiles) | 20 |
| OpenSSF Scorecard | n/a |
- Posture checks passed: signed commits, lockfiles; missing: security policy, dependency updates
Top findings
| Severity | Finding | Location |
|---|---|---|
| high | zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] |
.github/workflows/formatting.yml:16 |
| high | zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] |
.github/workflows/formatting.yml:18 |
| medium | zizmor/artipacked: credential persistence through GitHub Actions artifacts [confidence low] |
.github/workflows/formatting.yml:16 |
| medium | zizmor/excessive-permissions: overly broad permissions [confidence medium] |
.github/workflows/formatting.yml:13 |
Static signals only: the scorer never runs the project's code. Secret findings are pattern matches that were not verified, and secret values are never stored.
Repository profile
- Source lines: 29,465; test lines: 0
| Language | Lines |
|---|---|
| C# | 28,651 |
| Shell | 814 |