RepoTrust

Leaderboard github.com

genuinetools/binctr

Fully static, unprivileged, self-contained, containers as executable binaries.

  • View repository ↗
  • Go
  • ★ 2,516
  • commit 66e393036fad
  • scored 2026-11-14
  • scoring prov-5+qual-2+sec-2

AI provenance

0%

none-detected

Confidence
55%
Coverage
100%

Estimated share of AI-generated code. Explicit attribution is a lower bound.

Code quality

57/100

weak

Confidence
90%
Coverage
100%

Complexity, duplication, lint density, tests, CI, docs and review process.

Security

82/100

adequate

Confidence
85%
Coverage
100%

Secrets, static analysis, vulnerable dependencies, CI and supply-chain posture.

Dispute or request a re-score Full report JSON RepoTrust ai badgeRepoTrust quality badgeRepoTrust security badge

AI provenance

0% none-detected

No AI attribution or AI-consistent velocity signals detected.

How the score is built

  • Explicitly attributed share0%
  • Unattributed share in AI-pace bursts0%
  • Estimated AI-generated share0%
  • AI tool configuration files0
  • Work sessions at AI pace0
  • Releases at AI pacenot measured
  • Coding-style index (1.0+ means possible)0.29

Lines added per month all AI-attributed share

  1. 2016-042,836 · 0% AI
  2. 2016-050 · 0% AI
  3. 2016-090 · 0% AI
  4. 2017-061 · 0% AI
  5. 2018-034,504 · 0% AI
  6. 2018-060 · 0% AI
  7. 2018-091 · 0% AI
  8. 2018-100 · 0% AI
  9. 2018-120 · 0% AI
  10. 2019-052 · 0% AI

Evidence by analyzer

Explicit AI attributionok
attributed_commit_share
0.0%
attributed_commits
0
attributed_loc
0
attributed_loc_share
0.0%
commits
58
effective_loc
7,344
tools_detected
0
AI tool configurationok
artifacts
0
tools_configured
0
workflow_agents
0
Commit velocityok
excluded_import_loc
2,441
flagged_loc
0
flagged_loc_share
0.0%
flagged_units
0
max_loc_per_hour
384.93
measured_loc
4,903
median_loc_per_hour
350.58
pr_timed_units
0
pre_ai_era_burst_loc
0
pre_ai_era_bursts
0
pre_ai_era_measured_loc
4,903
work_units
13
Release velocityskipped
Coding styleok1 item
count:assistant_voice
0
count:emoji_in_code
0
count:narrated_steps
1
count:placeholder
0
files:assistant_voice
0
files:emoji_in_code
0
files:narrated_steps
1
files:placeholder
0
index
0.29
lines_scanned
3,416
per_kloc:assistant_voice
0
per_kloc:emoji_in_code
0
per_kloc:narrated_steps
0.29
per_kloc:placeholder
0

Code quality

57 weak

Code quality is weak: test-to-source ratio 0.00, no CI test run detected; 6% of function code in complex or long functions; 7% duplicated lines. Weakest area: testing.

How the score is built

  • Complexity82
  • Duplication65
  • Lint and smells80
  • Tests and CI15
  • Documentation65
  • Type safetynot measured
  • Review processnot measured

Evidence by analyzer

Complexity (lizard)ok1 item
complex_functions
1
function_nloc
1,050
functions
56
long_functions
0
many_param_functions
0
mean_ccn
4.54
p90_ccn
10
risky_nloc_share
6.5%
Duplication (jscpd)ok2 items
compared_lines
2,181
duplicated_lines
156
duplicated_share
7.1%
files
19
Lintok
category:correctness
3
findings
3
scanned_lines
3,416
weighted_findings
3
Tests and CIok1 item
  • CI config: .travis.yml .travis.yml
check:ci_present
yes
check:ci_runs_lint
no
check:ci_runs_tests
no
check:has_tests
no
check:test_ratio
no
check:tests_cochange
no
ci_files
1
cochange_commits
26
cochange_share
0.0%
source_lines
3,416
test_lines
0
test_ratio
0
Documentationok2 items
  • README.md README.md
  • LICENSE LICENSE
check:changelog
no
check:contributing
no
check:license
yes
check:readme
yes
readme_lines
49
Type safetyskipped

Security

82 adequate

Security posture is adequate: no high-impact findings. Weakest area: posture.

How the score is built

  • Secrets100
  • Static analysis (SAST)100
  • Vulnerable dependenciesnot measured
  • CI workflowsnot measured
  • Security posture0
  • OpenSSF Scorecardnot measured

Evidence by analyzer

OpenSSF Scorecardskipped

no published OpenSSF Scorecard result for this repo

Package registriesskipped

no registry dependencies declared

Secrets (gitleaks)ok
secrets_current
0
secrets_history
0
secrets_low_confidence
0
secrets_nonprod
0
Static analysis (opengrep)ok
findings
0
findings_high
0
findings_low
0
findings_medium
0
parse_errors
0
scanned_lines
3,416
weighted_findings
0
Dependencies (osv-scanner)skipped
CI workflows (zizmor)skipped
Security postureok
check:dependency_updates
no
check:lockfiles
yes
check:security_policy
no
check:signed_commits
no
signed_commit_share
13.8%
unpinned_manifests
0
Release downloadsok
binary_assets
0
signals
0
suspicious
0

Findings

3 medium

SeverityRuleLocationMessageTool
medium opengrep/go.lang.correctness.permissions.incorrect-default-permission container/process.go:133 Detected file permissions that are set to more than `0600` (user/owner can read and write). Setting file permissions to higher than `0600` is most likely unnecessary and violates the principle of least privilege. Instead, set... Lint
medium opengrep/go.lang.correctness.permissions.incorrect-default-permission container/rootfs.go:21 Detected file permissions that are set to more than `0600` (user/owner can read and write). Setting file permissions to higher than `0600` is most likely unnecessary and violates the principle of least privilege. Instead, set... Lint
medium opengrep/go.lang.correctness.permissions.incorrect-default-permission container/rootfs.go:38 Detected file permissions that are set to more than `0600` (user/owner can read and write). Setting file permissions to higher than `0600` is most likely unnecessary and violates the principle of least privilege. Instead, set... Lint

Tools and coverage

Every analyzer that ran on this commit. A failed or skipped tool is a coverage gap: its share of the score is left out and the coverage figure drops.

AnalyzerPillarStatusVersionFindingsNote
AI tool configurationAI provenanceoksignatures-v10
Explicit AI attributionAI provenanceoksignatures-v10
Release velocityAI provenanceskipped—0
Coding styleAI provenanceok—0
Commit velocityAI provenanceokprov-40
Complexity (lizard)Code qualityoklizard 1.25.10
DocumentationCode qualityok—0
Duplication (jscpd)Code qualityokrepotrust-dup-w60
LintCode qualityokopengrep 1.33.1; rules f1d2b562b4143
Tests and CICode qualityok—0
Type safetyCode qualityskipped—0
CI workflows (zizmor)Securityskipped—0
Dependencies (osv-scanner)Securityskipped—0
Release downloadsSecurityok—0
Security postureSecurityok—0
Package registriesSecurityskipped—0no registry dependencies declared
Static analysis (opengrep)Securityokopengrep 1.33.1; rules f1d2b562b4140
OpenSSF ScorecardSecurityskipped—0no published OpenSSF Scorecard result for this repo
Secrets (gitleaks)Securityokgitleaks 8.30.10

Score history

Scores from different scoring versions aren't directly comparable.

ScoredCommitScoringAI provenanceQualitySecurity
2026-11-1466e393036fadprov-5+qual-2+sec-20%5782
2026-11-1466e393036fadprov-4+qual-2+sec-20%5782

Embed a badge

Maintainers can show these in a README. Badges update when the repository is re-scored.

[![RepoTrust ai](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/badge/github.com/genuinetools/binctr/ai.svg)](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/r/github.com/genuinetools/binctr/)
[![RepoTrust quality](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/badge/github.com/genuinetools/binctr/quality.svg)](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/r/github.com/genuinetools/binctr/)
[![RepoTrust security](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/badge/github.com/genuinetools/binctr/security.svg)](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/r/github.com/genuinetools/binctr/)
Full text report
  • Repository: https://github.com/genuinetools/binctr
  • Commit: 66e393036fad10eb6b9252036d3b90d9ccff7660
  • Generated: 2026-11-14T14:52:04+00:00
  • Scorer 0.1.0, scoring prov-5+qual-2+sec-2, report schema v2

Scores

Pillar Score Signal Confidence Coverage
AI provenance (estimated AI-generated share) 0 none-detected 55% 100%
Code quality 57 weak 90% 100%
Security 82 adequate 85% 100%

AI provenance

No AI attribution or AI-consistent velocity signals detected.

  • Explicitly attributed share (lower bound): 0.0%

  • Unattributed share in AI-consistent velocity bursts: 0.0%

  • Estimated AI-generated share: 0.0%

  • Stylometry index: 0.29 per 1,000 lines (narrated steps 1, placeholders 0, assistant phrasing 0, emoji 0). Reported as a signal, not scored.

Month Lines added Attributed to AI
2016-04 2,836 0%
2017-06 1 0%
2018-03 4,504 0%
2018-09 1 0%
2019-05 2 0%

Evidence

  • step-by-step narration comment: // now we can inform butts to use pid1 as the pid to monitor (container/no)

AI provenance describes how code was produced; it is not a quality judgment. Unless attribution is explicit, these are signals consistent with AI generation, not proof. Squash/rebase workflows, imported code, and rewritten history reduce accuracy.

Code quality

Code quality is weak: test-to-source ratio 0.00, no CI test run detected; 6% of function code in complex or long functions; 7% duplicated lines. Weakest area: testing.

Area Score
Complexity (lizard) 82
Duplication 65
Code smells (Opengrep) 80
Tests and CI 15
Documentation 65
Type safety n/a
Process (Scorecard review/maintenance) n/a
  • Functions: 56; mean complexity 4.5, 90th percentile 10; 1 complex and 0 long functions
  • Duplicated lines: 7.1% of 2,181 compared
  • Tests: 0 test lines for 3,416 source lines (ratio 0.00); CI test commands: none detected; 0% of recent source commits also change tests
  • Docs missing or thin: contributing, changelog

Most complex functions:

Security

Security posture is adequate: no high-impact findings. Weakest area: posture.

Area Score
Secrets (gitleaks, tree + history) 100
Static analysis (Opengrep) 100
Vulnerable dependencies (OSV) n/a
CI workflows (zizmor) n/a
Posture (policy, updates, signing, lockfiles) 0
OpenSSF Scorecard n/a
  • Posture checks passed: lockfiles; missing: security policy, dependency updates, signed commits

Static signals only: the scorer never runs the project's code. Secret findings are pattern matches that were not verified, and secret values are never stored.

Repository profile

  • Source lines: 3,416; test lines: 0
Language Lines
Go 3,416