Leaderboard github.com

genocem/mingrammer-diagrams_search_tool

View repository ↗
Python
★ 0
commit 3c69e56f1a29
scored 2026-11-14
scoring prov-5+qual-2+sec-2

AI provenance

none-detected

Confidence: 41%
Coverage: 100%

Estimated share of AI-generated code. Explicit attribution is a lower bound.

Code quality

57/100

weak

Confidence: 90%
Coverage: 100%

Complexity, duplication, lint density, tests, CI, docs and review process.

Security

81/100

adequate

Confidence: 85%
Coverage: 100%

Secrets, static analysis, vulnerable dependencies, CI and supply-chain posture.

Dispute or request a re-score Full report JSON

AI provenance

0% none-detected

No AI attribution or AI-consistent velocity signals detected.

How the score is built

Explicitly attributed share0%
Unattributed share in AI-pace bursts0%
Estimated AI-generated share0%
AI tool configuration files0
Work sessions at AI pace0
Releases at AI pacenot measured
Coding-style index (1.0+ means possible)0.00

Lines added per month all AI-attributed share

2026-0214,062 · 0% AI

Evidence by analyzer

Explicit AI attributionok

attributed_commit_share: 0.0%
attributed_commits: 0
attributed_loc: 0
attributed_loc_share: 0.0%
commits: 2
effective_loc: 14,062
tools_detected: 0

AI tool configurationok

artifacts: 0
tools_configured: 0
workflow_agents: 0

Commit velocityok

excluded_import_loc: 14,062
flagged_loc: 0
flagged_loc_share: 0.0%
flagged_units: 0
max_loc_per_hour: 0
measured_loc: 0
median_loc_per_hour: 0
pr_timed_units: 0
pre_ai_era_burst_loc: 0
pre_ai_era_bursts: 0
pre_ai_era_measured_loc: 0
work_units: 0

Release velocityskipped

Coding styleok

count:assistant_voice: 0
count:emoji_in_code: 0
count:narrated_steps: 0
count:placeholder: 0
files:assistant_voice: 0
files:emoji_in_code: 0
files:narrated_steps: 0
files:placeholder: 0
index: 0
lines_scanned: 14,062
per_kloc:assistant_voice: 0
per_kloc:emoji_in_code: 0
per_kloc:narrated_steps: 0
per_kloc:placeholder: 0

Code quality

57 weak

Code quality is weak: test-to-source ratio 0.00, no CI test run detected; 8% of function code in complex or long functions; 0% duplicated lines. Weakest area: testing.

How the score is built

Complexity79
Duplication100
Lint and smells96
Tests and CI0
Documentation40
Type safety40
Review processnot measured

Evidence by analyzer

Complexity (lizard)ok1 item

__init__ in diagrams/__init__.py: complexity 17, 60 lines

complex_functions: 1
function_nloc: 759
functions: 93
long_functions: 0
many_param_functions: 2
mean_ccn: 2.54
p90_ccn: 5
risky_nloc_share: 7.9%

Duplication (jscpd)ok

compared_lines: 7,276
duplicated_lines: 0
duplicated_share: 0.0%
files: 260

Lintok

category:correctness: 2
findings: 2
scanned_lines: 14,062
weighted_findings: 2

Tests and CIok

check:ci_present: no
check:ci_runs_lint: no
check:ci_runs_tests: no
check:has_tests: no
check:test_ratio: no
check:tests_cochange: no
ci_files: 0
cochange_commits: 1
cochange_share: 0.0%
source_lines: 14,062
test_lines: 0
test_ratio: 0

Documentationok1 item

README.md README.md

check:changelog: no
check:contributing: no
check:license: no
check:readme: yes
readme_lines: 26

Type safetyok

check:low_escape_density: yes
check:strict_config: no
escapes: 0
escapes_per_kloc: 0

Security

81 adequate

Security posture is adequate: 6 high-severity SAST findings. Weakest area: posture.

How the score is built

Secrets100
Static analysis (SAST)87
Vulnerable dependenciesnot measured
CI workflowsnot measured
Security posture20
OpenSSF Scorecardnot measured

Evidence by analyzer

OpenSSF Scorecardskipped

no published OpenSSF Scorecard result for this repo

Package registriesskipped

no registry dependencies declared

Secrets (gitleaks)ok

secrets_current: 0
secrets_history: 0
secrets_low_confidence: 0
secrets_nonprod: 0

Static analysis (opengrep)ok

findings: 11
findings_high: 6
findings_low: 0
findings_medium: 5
parse_errors: 0
scanned_lines: 14,062
weighted_findings: 5.75

Dependencies (osv-scanner)skipped

CI workflows (zizmor)skipped

Security postureok

check:dependency_updates: no
check:lockfiles: yes
check:security_policy: no
check:signed_commits: yes
signed_commit_share: 50.0%
unpinned_manifests: 0

Release downloadsok

binary_assets: 0
signals: 0
suspicious: 0

Findings

6 high7 medium

Severity	Rule	Location	Message	Tool
high	`opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-document-method`	script.js:205	User controlled data in methods like `innerHTML`, `outerHTML` or `document.write` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low]	Static analysis (opengrep)
high	`opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-innerhtml`	script.js:205	User controlled data in a `card.innerHTML` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low]	Static analysis (opengrep)
high	`opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-document-method`	script.js:35	User controlled data in methods like `innerHTML`, `outerHTML` or `document.write` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low]	Static analysis (opengrep)
high	`opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-innerhtml`	script.js:35	User controlled data in a `providerContainer.innerHTML` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low]	Static analysis (opengrep)
high	`opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-document-method`	script.js:39	User controlled data in methods like `innerHTML`, `outerHTML` or `document.write` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low]	Static analysis (opengrep)
high	`opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-innerhtml`	script.js:39	User controlled data in a `categoryContainer.innerHTML` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low]	Static analysis (opengrep)
medium	`opengrep/python.lang.correctness.use-sys-exit`	export_search_data.py:37	Detected use of `exit`. Use `sys.exit` over the python shell `exit` built-in. `exit` is a helper for the interactive shell and may not be available on all Python implementations.	Lint
medium	`opengrep/python.lang.correctness.use-sys-exit`	generate_diagrams_index.py:74	Detected use of `exit`. Use `sys.exit` over the python shell `exit` built-in. `exit` is a helper for the interactive shell and may not be available on all Python implementations.	Lint
medium	`opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.exec-detected`	diagrams/cli.py:28	Detected the use of exec(). exec() can be dangerous if used to evaluate dynamic content. If this content can be input from outside the program, this may be a code injection vulnerability. Ensure evaluated content is not definable by...	Static analysis (opengrep)
medium	`opengrep/javascript.lang.security.html-in-template-string`	script.js:202	This template literal looks like HTML and has interpolated variables. These variables are not HTML-encoded by default. If the variables contain HTML tags, these may be interpreted by the browser, resulting in cross-site scripting (XSS)....	Static analysis (opengrep)
medium	`opengrep/javascript.lang.security.html-in-template-string`	script.js:205	This template literal looks like HTML and has interpolated variables. These variables are not HTML-encoded by default. If the variables contain HTML tags, these may be interpreted by the browser, resulting in cross-site scripting (XSS)....	Static analysis (opengrep)
medium	`opengrep/javascript.lang.security.html-in-template-string`	script.js:36	This template literal looks like HTML and has interpolated variables. These variables are not HTML-encoded by default. If the variables contain HTML tags, these may be interpreted by the browser, resulting in cross-site scripting (XSS)....	Static analysis (opengrep)
medium	`opengrep/javascript.lang.security.html-in-template-string`	script.js:40	This template literal looks like HTML and has interpolated variables. These variables are not HTML-encoded by default. If the variables contain HTML tags, these may be interpreted by the browser, resulting in cross-site scripting (XSS)....	Static analysis (opengrep)

Tools and coverage

Every analyzer that ran on this commit. A failed or skipped tool is a coverage gap: its share of the score is left out and the coverage figure drops.

Analyzer	Pillar	Status	Version	Findings	Note
AI tool configuration	AI provenance	ok	`signatures-v1`	0
Explicit AI attribution	AI provenance	ok	`signatures-v1`	0
Release velocity	AI provenance	skipped	`—`	0
Coding style	AI provenance	ok	`—`	0
Commit velocity	AI provenance	ok	`prov-4`	0
Complexity (lizard)	Code quality	ok	`lizard 1.25.1`	0
Documentation	Code quality	ok	`—`	0
Duplication (jscpd)	Code quality	ok	`repotrust-dup-w6`	0
Lint	Code quality	ok	`opengrep 1.33.1; rules f1d2b562b414`	2
Tests and CI	Code quality	ok	`—`	0
Type safety	Code quality	ok	`—`	0
CI workflows (zizmor)	Security	skipped	`—`	0
Dependencies (osv-scanner)	Security	skipped	`—`	0
Release downloads	Security	ok	`—`	0
Security posture	Security	ok	`—`	0
Package registries	Security	skipped	`—`	0	no registry dependencies declared
Static analysis (opengrep)	Security	ok	`opengrep 1.33.1; rules f1d2b562b414`	11
OpenSSF Scorecard	Security	skipped	`—`	0	no published OpenSSF Scorecard result for this repo
Secrets (gitleaks)	Security	ok	`gitleaks 8.30.1`	0

Score history

Scores from different scoring versions aren't directly comparable.

Scored	Commit	Scoring	AI provenance	Quality	Security
2026-11-14	`3c69e56f1a29`	`prov-5+qual-2+sec-2`	0%	57	81
2026-11-14	`3c69e56f1a29`	`prov-4+qual-2+sec-2`	0%	57	81

Embed a badge

Maintainers can show these in a README. Badges update when the repository is re-scored.

[![RepoTrust ai](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/badge/github.com/genocem/mingrammer-diagrams_search_tool/ai.svg)](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/r/github.com/genocem/mingrammer-diagrams_search_tool/)

[![RepoTrust quality](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/badge/github.com/genocem/mingrammer-diagrams_search_tool/quality.svg)](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/r/github.com/genocem/mingrammer-diagrams_search_tool/)

[![RepoTrust security](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/badge/github.com/genocem/mingrammer-diagrams_search_tool/security.svg)](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/r/github.com/genocem/mingrammer-diagrams_search_tool/)

Full text report

Repository: https://github.com/genocem/mingrammer-diagrams_search_tool
Commit: 3c69e56f1a299795aab8bb3b6f784dd2b1be7ecd
Generated: 2026-11-14T14:52:04+00:00
Scorer 0.1.0, scoring prov-5+qual-2+sec-2, report schema v2

Scores

Pillar	Score	Signal	Confidence	Coverage
AI provenance (estimated AI-generated share)	0	none-detected	41%	100%
Code quality	57	weak	90%	100%
Security	81	adequate	85%	100%

AI provenance

No AI attribution or AI-consistent velocity signals detected.

Explicitly attributed share (lower bound): 0.0%
Unattributed share in AI-consistent velocity bursts: 0.0%
Estimated AI-generated share: 0.0%

Month	Lines added	Attributed to AI
2026-02	14,062	0%

AI provenance describes how code was produced; it is not a quality judgment. Unless attribution is explicit, these are signals consistent with AI generation, not proof. Squash/rebase workflows, imported code, and rewritten history reduce accuracy.

Code quality

Code quality is weak: test-to-source ratio 0.00, no CI test run detected; 8% of function code in complex or long functions; 0% duplicated lines. Weakest area: testing.

Area	Score
Complexity (lizard)	79
Duplication	100
Code smells (Opengrep)	96
Tests and CI	0
Documentation	40
Type safety	40
Process (Scorecard review/maintenance)	n/a

Functions: 93; mean complexity 2.5, 90th percentile 5; 1 complex and 0 long functions
Duplicated lines: 0.0% of 7,276 compared
Tests: 0 test lines for 14,062 source lines (ratio 0.00); CI test commands: none detected; 0% of recent source commits also change tests
Docs missing or thin: license, contributing, changelog

Most complex functions:

init in diagrams/init.py: complexity 17, 60 lines

Security

Security posture is adequate: 6 high-severity SAST findings. Weakest area: posture.

Area	Score
Secrets (gitleaks, tree + history)	100
Static analysis (Opengrep)	87
Vulnerable dependencies (OSV)	n/a
CI workflows (zizmor)	n/a
Posture (policy, updates, signing, lockfiles)	20
OpenSSF Scorecard	n/a

Posture checks passed: signed commits, lockfiles; missing: security policy, dependency updates

Top findings

Severity	Finding	Location
high	`opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-document-method`: User controlled data in methods like `innerHTML`, `outerHTML` or `document.write` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low]	script.js:35
high	`opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-innerhtml`: User controlled data in a `providerContainer.innerHTML` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low]	script.js:35
high	`opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-document-method`: User controlled data in methods like `innerHTML`, `outerHTML` or `document.write` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low]	script.js:39
high	`opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-innerhtml`: User controlled data in a `categoryContainer.innerHTML` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low]	script.js:39
high	`opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-document-method`: User controlled data in methods like `innerHTML`, `outerHTML` or `document.write` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low]	script.js:205
high	`opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-innerhtml`: User controlled data in a `card.innerHTML` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low]	script.js:205
medium	`opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.exec-detected`: Detected the use of exec(). exec() can be dangerous if used to evaluate dynamic content. If this content can be input from outside the program, this may be a code injection vulnerability. Ensure evaluated content is not definable by external sources. [confidence low]	diagrams/cli.py:28
medium	`opengrep/javascript.lang.security.html-in-template-string`: This template literal looks like HTML and has interpolated variables. These variables are not HTML-encoded by default. If the variables contain HTML tags, these may be interpreted by the browser, resulting in cross-site scripting (XSS). [confidence low]	script.js:36
medium	`opengrep/javascript.lang.security.html-in-template-string`: This template literal looks like HTML and has interpolated variables. These variables are not HTML-encoded by default. If the variables contain HTML tags, these may be interpreted by the browser, resulting in cross-site scripting (XSS). [confidence low]	script.js:40
medium	`opengrep/javascript.lang.security.html-in-template-string`: This template literal looks like HTML and has interpolated variables. These variables are not HTML-encoded by default. If the variables contain HTML tags, these may be interpreted by the browser, resulting in cross-site scripting (XSS). [confidence low]	script.js:202
medium	`opengrep/javascript.lang.security.html-in-template-string`: This template literal looks like HTML and has interpolated variables. These variables are not HTML-encoded by default. If the variables contain HTML tags, these may be interpreted by the browser, resulting in cross-site scripting (XSS). [confidence low]	script.js:205

Static signals only: the scorer never runs the project's code. Secret findings are pattern matches that were not verified, and secret values are never stored.

Repository profile

Source lines: 14,062; test lines: 0

Language	Lines
Python	13,796
JavaScript	266