Leaderboard github.com

flektor/nextnext

View repository ↗
TypeScript
★ 0
commit 300cc0d60860
scored 2026-11-14
scoring prov-5+qual-2+sec-2

AI provenance

possible

Confidence: 51%
Coverage: 100%

Estimated share of AI-generated code. Explicit attribution is a lower bound.

Code quality

59/100

weak

Confidence: 90%
Coverage: 100%

Complexity, duplication, lint density, tests, CI, docs and review process.

Security

59/100

weak

Confidence: 85%
Coverage: 100%

Secrets, static analysis, vulnerable dependencies, CI and supply-chain posture.

Dispute or request a re-score Full report JSON

AI provenance

0% possible

Weak signals consistent with AI-assisted development. Comments and strings use phrasing typical of LLM-written code (see the coding style evidence).

How the score is built

Explicitly attributed share0%
Unattributed share in AI-pace bursts0%
Estimated AI-generated share0%
AI tool configuration files0
Work sessions at AI pace0
Releases at AI pacenot measured
Coding-style index (1.0+ means possible)2.69

Lines added per month all AI-attributed share

2025-021,383 · 0% AI
2025-032,141 · 0% AI
2025-04873 · 0% AI
2025-05921 · 0% AI

Evidence by analyzer

Explicit AI attributionok

attributed_commit_share: 0.0%
attributed_commits: 0
attributed_loc: 0
attributed_loc_share: 0.0%
commits: 42
effective_loc: 5,318
tools_detected: 0

AI tool configurationok

artifacts: 0
tools_configured: 0
workflow_agents: 0

Commit velocityok

excluded_import_loc: 0
flagged_loc: 0
flagged_loc_share: 0.0%
flagged_units: 0
max_loc_per_hour: 327
measured_loc: 5,318
median_loc_per_hour: 62.90
pr_timed_units: 0
pre_ai_era_burst_loc: 0
pre_ai_era_bursts: 0
pre_ai_era_measured_loc: 0
work_units: 20

Release velocityskipped

Coding styleok

count:assistant_voice: 0
count:emoji_in_code: 10
count:narrated_steps: 0
count:placeholder: 0
files:assistant_voice: 0
files:emoji_in_code: 4
files:narrated_steps: 0
files:placeholder: 0
index: 2.69
lines_scanned: 1,857
per_kloc:assistant_voice: 0
per_kloc:emoji_in_code: 5.38
per_kloc:narrated_steps: 0
per_kloc:placeholder: 0

Code quality

59 weak

Code quality is weak: test-to-source ratio 0.29, no CI test run detected; 8% of function code in complex or long functions; 9% duplicated lines. Weakest area: docs.

How the score is built

Complexity79
Duplication58
Lint and smells67
Tests and CI45
Documentation40
Type safety60
Review processnot measured

Evidence by analyzer

Complexity (lizard)ok1 item

tokenize in src/parser/tokenizer.ts: complexity 27, 95 lines

complex_functions: 1
function_nloc: 1,223
functions: 147
long_functions: 0
many_param_functions: 0
mean_ccn: 2.22
p90_ccn: 5
risky_nloc_share: 7.8%

Duplication (jscpd)ok3 items

compared_lines: 1,119
duplicated_lines: 101
duplicated_share: 9.0%
files: 32

Lintok

category:best-practice: 1
category:correctness: 8
findings: 9
scanned_lines: 1,857
weighted_findings: 3

Tests and CIok

check:ci_present: no
check:ci_runs_lint: no
check:ci_runs_tests: no
check:has_tests: yes
check:test_ratio: no
check:tests_cochange: yes
ci_files: 0
cochange_commits: 35
cochange_share: 25.7%
source_lines: 1,857
test_lines: 541
test_ratio: 0.29

Documentationok1 item

README.md README.md

check:changelog: no
check:contributing: no
check:license: no
check:readme: yes
readme_lines: 36

Type safetyok1 item

TypeScript strict type checking: tsconfig.json tsconfig.json

check:low_escape_density: no
check:strict_config: yes
escapes: 25
escapes_per_kloc: 17.01

Security

59 weak

Security posture is weak: 22 known vulnerabilities in 7 dependencies. Weakest area: posture.

How the score is built

Secrets100
Static analysis (SAST)47
Vulnerable dependencies48
CI workflowsnot measured
Security posture0
OpenSSF Scorecardnot measured

Evidence by analyzer

OpenSSF Scorecardskipped

no published OpenSSF Scorecard result for this repo

Package registriesok

checked: 13
declared: 13
lookup_errors: 0
missing: 0
recent: 0

Secrets (gitleaks)ok

secrets_current: 0
secrets_history: 0
secrets_low_confidence: 0
secrets_nonprod: 0

Static analysis (opengrep)ok

findings: 16
findings_high: 0
findings_low: 0
findings_medium: 16
parse_errors: 0
scanned_lines: 1,857
weighted_findings: 4

Dependencies (osv-scanner)ok

penalty: 44
vulnerabilities: 22
vulnerable_packages: 7
vulns_critical: 0
vulns_high: 14
vulns_low: 2
vulns_medium: 6
vulns_unknown: 0

CI workflows (zizmor)skipped

Security postureok

check:dependency_updates: no
check:lockfiles: yes
check:security_policy: no
check:signed_commits: no
signed_commit_share: 0.0%
unpinned_manifests: 0

Release downloadsok

binary_assets: 0
signals: 0
suspicious: 0

Findings

14 high23 medium10 low

Severity	Rule	Location	Message	Tool
high	`osv/GHSA-23c5-xmqv-rm74`	package-lock.json	[email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-23c5-xmqv-rm74	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
high	`osv/GHSA-25h7-pfq9-p65f`	package-lock.json	[email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-25h7-pfq9-p65f	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
high	`osv/GHSA-2883-xcg3-v3hh`	package-lock.json	[email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-2883-xcg3-v3hh	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
high	`osv/GHSA-3jxr-9vmj-r5cp`	package-lock.json	[email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-3jxr-9vmj-r5cp	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
high	`osv/GHSA-3ppc-4f35-3m26`	package-lock.json	[email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-3ppc-4f35-3m26	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
high	`osv/GHSA-52cp-r559-cp3m`	package-lock.json	[email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-52cp-r559-cp3m	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
high	`osv/GHSA-5p4m-2wfm-xmqj`	package-lock.json	[email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-5p4m-2wfm-xmqj	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
high	`osv/GHSA-6j4f-fj2g-mc7p`	package-lock.json	[email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-6j4f-fj2g-mc7p	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
high	`osv/GHSA-7r86-cg39-jmmj`	package-lock.json	[email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-7r86-cg39-jmmj	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
high	`osv/GHSA-c2c7-rcm5-vvqj`	package-lock.json	[email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-c2c7-rcm5-vvqj	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
high	`osv/GHSA-mh99-v99m-4gvg`	package-lock.json	[email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-mh99-v99m-4gvg	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
high	`osv/GHSA-qhr7-859c-m2p7`	package-lock.json	[email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-qhr7-859c-m2p7	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
high	`osv/GHSA-rf6f-7fwh-wjgh`	package-lock.json	[email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-rf6f-7fwh-wjgh	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
high	`osv/GHSA-rgw5-rvv9-x895`	package-lock.json	[email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-rgw5-rvv9-x895	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
medium	`opengrep/javascript.lang.best-practice.lazy-load-module`	src/watcher/server.ts:19	Lazy loading can complicate code bundling if care is not taken, also `require`s are run synchronously by Node.js. If they are called from within a function, it may block other requests from being handled at a more critical time. The...	Lint
medium	`osv/GHSA-2g4f-4pwh-qvx6`	package-lock.json	[email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-2g4f-4pwh-qvx6	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
medium	`osv/GHSA-3v7f-55p6-f55p`	package-lock.json	[email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-3v7f-55p6-f55p	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
medium	`osv/GHSA-f886-m6hf-6m8v`	package-lock.json	[email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-f886-m6hf-6m8v	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
medium	`osv/GHSA-h67p-54hq-rp68`	package-lock.json	[email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-h67p-54hq-rp68	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
medium	`osv/GHSA-mh29-5h37-fv8m`	package-lock.json	[email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-mh29-5h37-fv8m	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
medium	`osv/GHSA-q2hr-2g5m-vwhr`	package-lock.json	[email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-q2hr-2g5m-vwhr	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
medium	`opengrep/javascript.lang.security.audit.path-traversal.path-join-resolve-traversal`	src/jsxFileReader.ts:16	Detected possible user input going into a `path.join` or `path.resolve` function. This could possibly lead to a path traversal vulnerability, where the attacker can access arbitrary files stored in the file system. Instead, be sure to...	Static analysis (opengrep)
medium	`opengrep/javascript.lang.security.audit.path-traversal.path-join-resolve-traversal`	src/jsxFileReader.ts:16	Detected possible user input going into a `path.join` or `path.resolve` function. This could possibly lead to a path traversal vulnerability, where the attacker can access arbitrary files stored in the file system. Instead, be sure to...	Static analysis (opengrep)
medium	`opengrep/javascript.lang.security.audit.detect-non-literal-fs-filename`	src/jsxFileReader.ts:19	Detected that function argument `filepath` has entered the fs module. An attacker could potentially control the location of this file, to include going backwards in the directory with '../'. To address this, ensure that user-controlled...	Static analysis (opengrep)
medium	`opengrep/javascript.lang.security.audit.detect-non-literal-fs-filename`	src/jsxFileReader.ts:19	Detected that function argument `root` has entered the fs module. An attacker could potentially control the location of this file, to include going backwards in the directory with '../'. To address this, ensure that user-controlled...	Static analysis (opengrep)
medium	`opengrep/javascript.lang.security.audit.incomplete-sanitization`	src/parser/tokenizer.ts:105	`children.replace` method will only replace the first occurrence when used with a string argument ('\r'). If this method is used for escaping of dangerous data then there is a possibility for a bypass. Try to use sanitization library...	Static analysis (opengrep)
medium	`opengrep/javascript.lang.security.audit.incomplete-sanitization`	src/parser/tokenizer.ts:76	`value.replace` method will only replace the first occurrence when used with a string argument ('\n'). If this method is used for escaping of dangerous data then there is a possibility for a bypass. Try to use sanitization library...	Static analysis (opengrep)
medium	`opengrep/javascript.lang.security.audit.detect-non-literal-fs-filename`	src/tinyTest/run.ts:11	Detected that function argument `dir` has entered the fs module. An attacker could potentially control the location of this file, to include going backwards in the directory with '../'. To address this, ensure that user-controlled...	Static analysis (opengrep)
medium	`opengrep/javascript.lang.security.audit.path-traversal.path-join-resolve-traversal`	src/tinyTest/run.ts:13	Detected possible user input going into a `path.join` or `path.resolve` function. This could possibly lead to a path traversal vulnerability, where the attacker can access arbitrary files stored in the file system. Instead, be sure to...	Static analysis (opengrep)
medium	`opengrep/javascript.lang.security.audit.path-traversal.path-join-resolve-traversal`	src/tinyTest/run.ts:13	Detected possible user input going into a `path.join` or `path.resolve` function. This could possibly lead to a path traversal vulnerability, where the attacker can access arbitrary files stored in the file system. Instead, be sure to...	Static analysis (opengrep)
medium	`opengrep/javascript.lang.security.audit.detect-non-literal-fs-filename`	src/tinyTest/run.ts:15	Detected that function argument `dir` has entered the fs module. An attacker could potentially control the location of this file, to include going backwards in the directory with '../'. To address this, ensure that user-controlled...	Static analysis (opengrep)
medium	`opengrep/javascript.lang.security.audit.detect-non-literal-fs-filename`	src/tinyTest/run.ts:15	Detected that function argument `file` has entered the fs module. An attacker could potentially control the location of this file, to include going backwards in the directory with '../'. To address this, ensure that user-controlled...	Static analysis (opengrep)
medium	`opengrep/javascript.lang.security.audit.detect-non-literal-require`	src/tinyTest/run.ts:26	Detected the use of require(variable). Calling require with a non-literal argument might allow an attacker to load and run arbitrary code, or access arbitrary files. [confidence low]	Static analysis (opengrep)
medium	`opengrep/javascript.lang.security.audit.detect-non-literal-fs-filename`	src/utils/dotEnv.ts:11	Detected that function argument `filePath` has entered the fs module. An attacker could potentially control the location of this file, to include going backwards in the directory with '../'. To address this, ensure that user-controlled...	Static analysis (opengrep)
medium	`opengrep/javascript.lang.security.audit.detect-non-literal-fs-filename`	src/utils/dotEnv.ts:15	Detected that function argument `filePath` has entered the fs module. An attacker could potentially control the location of this file, to include going backwards in the directory with '../'. To address this, ensure that user-controlled...	Static analysis (opengrep)
medium	`opengrep/javascript.lang.security.audit.path-traversal.path-join-resolve-traversal`	src/utils/dotEnv.ts:9	Detected possible user input going into a `path.join` or `path.resolve` function. This could possibly lead to a path traversal vulnerability, where the attacker can access arbitrary files stored in the file system. Instead, be sure to...	Static analysis (opengrep)
medium	`opengrep/javascript.lang.security.audit.detect-non-literal-fs-filename`	src/watcher/server.ts:28	Detected that function argument `dir` has entered the fs module. An attacker could potentially control the location of this file, to include going backwards in the directory with '../'. To address this, ensure that user-controlled...	Static analysis (opengrep)
low	`opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.missing-template-string-indicator`	src/indexPage.ts:21	This looks like a JavaScript template string. Are you missing a '$' in front of '{...}'?	Lint
low	`opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.missing-template-string-indicator`	src/indexPage.ts:67	This looks like a JavaScript template string. Are you missing a '$' in front of '{...}'?	Lint
low	`opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.missing-template-string-indicator`	src/indexPage.ts:67	This looks like a JavaScript template string. Are you missing a '$' in front of '{...}'?	Lint
low	`opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.missing-template-string-indicator`	src/indexPage.ts:89	This looks like a JavaScript template string. Are you missing a '$' in front of '{...}'?	Lint
low	`opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.missing-template-string-indicator`	src/indexPage.ts:89	This looks like a JavaScript template string. Are you missing a '$' in front of '{...}'?	Lint
low	`opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.missing-template-string-indicator`	src/parser/jsxParser.ts:142	This looks like a JavaScript template string. Are you missing a '$' in front of '{...}'?	Lint
low	`opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.missing-template-string-indicator`	src/parser/jsxParser.ts:142	This looks like a JavaScript template string. Are you missing a '$' in front of '{...}'?	Lint
low	`opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.missing-template-string-indicator`	src/parser/jsxParser.ts:142	This looks like a JavaScript template string. Are you missing a '$' in front of '{...}'?	Lint
low	`osv/GHSA-73rr-hh4g-fpgx`	package-lock.json	[email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-73rr-hh4g-fpgx	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
low	`osv/GHSA-v6h2-p8h4-qcjw`	package-lock.json	[email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-v6h2-p8h4-qcjw	Dependencies (osv-scanner)

Tools and coverage

Every analyzer that ran on this commit. A failed or skipped tool is a coverage gap: its share of the score is left out and the coverage figure drops.

Analyzer	Pillar	Status	Version	Findings	Note
AI tool configuration	AI provenance	ok	`signatures-v1`	0
Explicit AI attribution	AI provenance	ok	`signatures-v1`	0
Release velocity	AI provenance	skipped	`—`	0
Coding style	AI provenance	ok	`—`	0
Commit velocity	AI provenance	ok	`prov-4`	0
Complexity (lizard)	Code quality	ok	`lizard 1.25.1`	0
Documentation	Code quality	ok	`—`	0
Duplication (jscpd)	Code quality	ok	`repotrust-dup-w6`	0
Lint	Code quality	ok	`opengrep 1.33.1; rules f1d2b562b414`	9
Tests and CI	Code quality	ok	`—`	0
Type safety	Code quality	ok	`—`	0
CI workflows (zizmor)	Security	skipped	`—`	0
Dependencies (osv-scanner)	Security	ok	`osv-scanner version: 2.7.1`	22
Release downloads	Security	ok	`—`	0
Security posture	Security	ok	`—`	0
Package registries	Security	ok	`—`	0
Static analysis (opengrep)	Security	ok	`opengrep 1.33.1; rules f1d2b562b414`	16
OpenSSF Scorecard	Security	skipped	`—`	0	no published OpenSSF Scorecard result for this repo
Secrets (gitleaks)	Security	ok	`gitleaks 8.30.1`	0

Score history

Scores from different scoring versions aren't directly comparable.

Scored	Commit	Scoring	AI provenance	Quality	Security
2026-11-14	`300cc0d60860`	`prov-5+qual-2+sec-2`	0%	59	59
2026-11-14	`300cc0d60860`	`prov-4+qual-2+sec-2`	0%	59	59

Embed a badge

Maintainers can show these in a README. Badges update when the repository is re-scored.

[![RepoTrust ai](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/badge/github.com/flektor/nextnext/ai.svg)](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/r/github.com/flektor/nextnext/)

[![RepoTrust quality](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/badge/github.com/flektor/nextnext/quality.svg)](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/r/github.com/flektor/nextnext/)

[![RepoTrust security](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/badge/github.com/flektor/nextnext/security.svg)](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/r/github.com/flektor/nextnext/)

Full text report

Repository: https://github.com/flektor/nextnext
Commit: 300cc0d60860ad7dc58b6c94ea54af38d993baca
Generated: 2026-11-14T14:52:04+00:00
Scorer 0.1.0, scoring prov-5+qual-2+sec-2, report schema v2

Scores

Pillar	Score	Signal	Confidence	Coverage
AI provenance (estimated AI-generated share)	0	possible	51%	100%
Code quality	59	weak	90%	100%
Security	59	weak	85%	100%

AI provenance

Weak signals consistent with AI-assisted development. Comments and strings use phrasing typical of LLM-written code (see the coding style evidence).

Explicitly attributed share (lower bound): 0.0%
Unattributed share in AI-consistent velocity bursts: 0.0%
Estimated AI-generated share: 0.0%
Stylometry index: 2.69 per 1,000 lines (narrated steps 0, placeholders 0, assistant phrasing 0, emoji 10). Reported as a signal, not scored.

Month	Lines added	Attributed to AI
2025-02	1,383	0%
2025-03	2,141	0%
2025-04	873	0%
2025-05	921	0%

AI provenance describes how code was produced; it is not a quality judgment. Unless attribution is explicit, these are signals consistent with AI generation, not proof. Squash/rebase workflows, imported code, and rewritten history reduce accuracy.

Code quality

Code quality is weak: test-to-source ratio 0.29, no CI test run detected; 8% of function code in complex or long functions; 9% duplicated lines. Weakest area: docs.

Area	Score
Complexity (lizard)	79
Duplication	58
Code smells (Opengrep)	67
Tests and CI	45
Documentation	40
Type safety	60
Process (Scorecard review/maintenance)	n/a

Functions: 147; mean complexity 2.2, 90th percentile 5; 1 complex and 0 long functions
Duplicated lines: 9.0% of 1,119 compared
Tests: 541 test lines for 1,857 source lines (ratio 0.29); CI test commands: none detected; 26% of recent source commits also change tests
Docs missing or thin: license, contributing, changelog

Most complex functions:

tokenize in src/parser/tokenizer.ts: complexity 27, 95 lines

Security

Security posture is weak: 22 known vulnerabilities in 7 dependencies. Weakest area: posture.

Area	Score
Secrets (gitleaks, tree + history)	100
Static analysis (Opengrep)	47
Vulnerable dependencies (OSV)	48
CI workflows (zizmor)	n/a
Posture (policy, updates, signing, lockfiles)	0
OpenSSF Scorecard	n/a

Known vulnerabilities: 22 in 7 packages (critical 0, high 14, medium 6, low 2)
Posture checks passed: lockfiles; missing: security policy, dependency updates, signed commits

Top findings

Severity	Finding	Location
high	`osv/GHSA-3jxr-9vmj-r5cp`: [email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-3jxr-9vmj-r5cp	package-lock.json
high	`osv/GHSA-6j4f-fj2g-mc7p`: [email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-6j4f-fj2g-mc7p	package-lock.json
high	`osv/GHSA-mh99-v99m-4gvg`: [email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-mh99-v99m-4gvg	package-lock.json
high	`osv/GHSA-qhr7-859c-m2p7`: [email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-qhr7-859c-m2p7	package-lock.json
high	`osv/GHSA-rgw5-rvv9-x895`: [email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-rgw5-rvv9-x895	package-lock.json
high	`osv/GHSA-25h7-pfq9-p65f`: [email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-25h7-pfq9-p65f	package-lock.json
high	`osv/GHSA-rf6f-7fwh-wjgh`: [email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-rf6f-7fwh-wjgh	package-lock.json
high	`osv/GHSA-2883-xcg3-v3hh`: [email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-2883-xcg3-v3hh	package-lock.json
high	`osv/GHSA-52cp-r559-cp3m`: [email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-52cp-r559-cp3m	package-lock.json
high	`osv/GHSA-5p4m-2wfm-xmqj`: [email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-5p4m-2wfm-xmqj	package-lock.json
high	`osv/GHSA-23c5-xmqv-rm74`: [email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-23c5-xmqv-rm74	package-lock.json
high	`osv/GHSA-3ppc-4f35-3m26`: [email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-3ppc-4f35-3m26	package-lock.json
high	`osv/GHSA-7r86-cg39-jmmj`: [email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-7r86-cg39-jmmj	package-lock.json
high	`osv/GHSA-c2c7-rcm5-vvqj`: [email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-c2c7-rcm5-vvqj	package-lock.json
medium	`opengrep/javascript.lang.security.audit.path-traversal.path-join-resolve-traversal`: Detected possible user input going into a `path.join` or `path.resolve` function. This could possibly lead to a path traversal vulnerability, where the attacker can access arbitrary files stored in the file system. Instead, be sure to sanitize or validate user input first. [confidence low]	src/jsxFileReader.ts:16
medium	`opengrep/javascript.lang.security.audit.path-traversal.path-join-resolve-traversal`: Detected possible user input going into a `path.join` or `path.resolve` function. This could possibly lead to a path traversal vulnerability, where the attacker can access arbitrary files stored in the file system. Instead, be sure to sanitize or validate user input first. [confidence low]	src/jsxFileReader.ts:16
medium	`opengrep/javascript.lang.security.audit.detect-non-literal-fs-filename`: Detected that function argument `filepath` has entered the fs module. An attacker could potentially control the location of this file, to include going backwards in the directory with '../'. To address this, ensure that user-controlled variables in file paths are validated. [confidence low]	src/jsxFileReader.ts:19
medium	`opengrep/javascript.lang.security.audit.detect-non-literal-fs-filename`: Detected that function argument `root` has entered the fs module. An attacker could potentially control the location of this file, to include going backwards in the directory with '../'. To address this, ensure that user-controlled variables in file paths are validated. [confidence low]	src/jsxFileReader.ts:19
medium	`opengrep/javascript.lang.security.audit.incomplete-sanitization`: `value.replace` method will only replace the first occurrence when used with a string argument ('\n'). If this method is used for escaping of dangerous data then there is a possibility for a bypass. Try to use sanitization library instead or use a Regex with a global flag. [confidence low]	src/parser/tokenizer.ts:76
medium	`opengrep/javascript.lang.security.audit.incomplete-sanitization`: `children.replace` method will only replace the first occurrence when used with a string argument ('\r'). If this method is used for escaping of dangerous data then there is a possibility for a bypass. Try to use sanitization library instead or use a Regex with a global flag. [confidence low]	src/parser/tokenizer.ts:105
medium	`opengrep/javascript.lang.security.audit.detect-non-literal-fs-filename`: Detected that function argument `dir` has entered the fs module. An attacker could potentially control the location of this file, to include going backwards in the directory with '../'. To address this, ensure that user-controlled variables in file paths are validated. [confidence low]	src/tinyTest/run.ts:11
medium	`opengrep/javascript.lang.security.audit.path-traversal.path-join-resolve-traversal`: Detected possible user input going into a `path.join` or `path.resolve` function. This could possibly lead to a path traversal vulnerability, where the attacker can access arbitrary files stored in the file system. Instead, be sure to sanitize or validate user input first. [confidence low]	src/tinyTest/run.ts:13
medium	`opengrep/javascript.lang.security.audit.path-traversal.path-join-resolve-traversal`: Detected possible user input going into a `path.join` or `path.resolve` function. This could possibly lead to a path traversal vulnerability, where the attacker can access arbitrary files stored in the file system. Instead, be sure to sanitize or validate user input first. [confidence low]	src/tinyTest/run.ts:13
medium	`opengrep/javascript.lang.security.audit.detect-non-literal-fs-filename`: Detected that function argument `dir` has entered the fs module. An attacker could potentially control the location of this file, to include going backwards in the directory with '../'. To address this, ensure that user-controlled variables in file paths are validated. [confidence low]	src/tinyTest/run.ts:15
medium	`opengrep/javascript.lang.security.audit.detect-non-literal-fs-filename`: Detected that function argument `file` has entered the fs module. An attacker could potentially control the location of this file, to include going backwards in the directory with '../'. To address this, ensure that user-controlled variables in file paths are validated. [confidence low]	src/tinyTest/run.ts:15

Static signals only: the scorer never runs the project's code. Secret findings are pattern matches that were not verified, and secret values are never stored.

Repository profile

Source lines: 1,857; test lines: 541

Language	Lines
TypeScript	1,980
JavaScript	418