RepoTrust

Leaderboard github.com

faizfahmi77/ScanDot

Experimental Android 3D scanning and point-cloud viewer

  • View repository ↗
  • Kotlin
  • ★ 466
  • commit dbd6f4e3c616
  • scored 2026-11-14
  • scoring prov-5+qual-2+sec-2

AI provenance

0%

none-detected

Confidence
41%
Coverage
100%

Estimated share of AI-generated code. Explicit attribution is a lower bound.

Code quality

76/100

adequate

Confidence
90%
Coverage
100%

Complexity, duplication, lint density, tests, CI, docs and review process.

Security

65/100

weak

Confidence
85%
Coverage
100%

Secrets, static analysis, vulnerable dependencies, CI and supply-chain posture.

AI provenance

0% none-detected

No AI attribution or AI-consistent velocity signals detected.

How the score is built

  • Explicitly attributed share0%
  • Unattributed share in AI-pace bursts0%
  • Estimated AI-generated share0%
  • AI tool configuration files0
  • Work sessions at AI pace0
  • Releases at AI pacenot measured
  • Coding-style index (1.0+ means possible)0.00

Lines added per month all AI-attributed share

  1. 2026-115,842 · 0% AI

Evidence by analyzer

Explicit AI attributionok
attributed_commit_share
0.0%
attributed_commits
0
attributed_loc
0
attributed_loc_share
0.0%
commits
5
effective_loc
5,842
tools_detected
0
AI tool configurationok
artifacts
0
tools_configured
0
workflow_agents
0
Commit velocityok
excluded_import_loc
5,788
flagged_loc
0
flagged_loc_share
0.0%
flagged_units
0
max_loc_per_hour
13.07
measured_loc
54
median_loc_per_hour
0
pr_timed_units
0
pre_ai_era_burst_loc
0
pre_ai_era_bursts
0
pre_ai_era_measured_loc
0
work_units
1
Release velocityskipped
Coding styleok
count:assistant_voice
0
count:emoji_in_code
0
count:narrated_steps
0
count:placeholder
0
files:assistant_voice
0
files:emoji_in_code
0
files:narrated_steps
0
files:placeholder
0
index
0
lines_scanned
2,831
per_kloc:assistant_voice
0
per_kloc:emoji_in_code
0
per_kloc:narrated_steps
0
per_kloc:placeholder
0

Code quality

76 adequate

Code quality is adequate: test-to-source ratio 0.40, CI runs tests; 37% of function code in complex or long functions; 0% duplicated lines. Weakest area: complexity.

How the score is built

  • Complexity33
  • Duplication100
  • Lint and smells100
  • Tests and CI85
  • Documentation80
  • Type safety40
  • Review processnot measured

Evidence by analyzer

Complexity (lizard)ok9 items
complex_functions
9
function_nloc
1,947
functions
163
long_functions
1
many_param_functions
1
mean_ccn
3.96
p90_ccn
8
risky_nloc_share
36.6%
Duplication (jscpd)ok
compared_lines
2,129
duplicated_lines
0
duplicated_share
0.0%
files
27
Lintok
findings
0
scanned_lines
2,743
weighted_findings
0
Tests and CIok2 items
  • CI config: .github/workflows/ci.yml .github/workflows/ci.yml
  • CI runs tests (unittest)
check:ci_present
yes
check:ci_runs_lint
no
check:ci_runs_tests
yes
check:has_tests
yes
check:test_ratio
no
check:tests_cochange
yes
ci_files
1
cochange_commits
2
cochange_share
100.0%
source_lines
2,831
test_lines
1,142
test_ratio
0.40
Documentationok3 items
  • README.md README.md
  • LICENSE LICENSE
  • CONTRIBUTING.md CONTRIBUTING.md
check:changelog
no
check:contributing
yes
check:license
yes
check:readme
yes
readme_lines
39
Type safetyok
check:low_escape_density
yes
check:strict_config
no
escapes
5
escapes_per_kloc
5

Security

65 weak

Security posture is weak: 7 high-severity SAST findings. Weakest area: posture.

How the score is built

  • Secrets100
  • Static analysis (SAST)32
  • Vulnerable dependenciesnot measured
  • CI workflows96
  • Security posture0
  • OpenSSF Scorecardnot measured

Evidence by analyzer

OpenSSF Scorecardskipped

no published OpenSSF Scorecard result for this repo

Package registriesskipped

no registry dependencies declared

Secrets (gitleaks)ok
secrets_current
0
secrets_history
0
secrets_low_confidence
0
secrets_nonprod
0
Static analysis (opengrep)ok
findings
8
findings_high
7
findings_low
0
findings_medium
1
parse_errors
0
scanned_lines
2,743
weighted_findings
9
Dependencies (osv-scanner)skipped
CI workflows (zizmor)ok
findings
2
findings_high
0
findings_low
0
findings_medium
2
penalty
2.40
workflows
1
Security postureok
check:dependency_updates
no
check:lockfiles
yes
check:security_policy
no
check:signed_commits
no
signed_commit_share
0.0%
unpinned_manifests
0
Release downloadsok2 items
binary_assets
1
signals
2
suspicious
0

Findings

7 high3 medium

SeverityRuleLocationMessageTool
high opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.dangerous-subprocess-use-audit android-app/tools/check_cloud_gl.py:38 Detected subprocess function 'run' without a static string. If this data can be controlled by a malicious actor, it may be an instance of command injection. Audit the use of this call to ensure it is not controllable by an external... Static analysis (opengrep)
high opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.dangerous-subprocess-use-tainted-env-args android-app/tools/check_cloud_gl.py:38 Detected subprocess function 'run' with user controlled data. A malicious actor could leverage this to perform command injection. You may consider using 'shlex.quote()'. [confidence medium] Static analysis (opengrep)
high opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.dangerous-subprocess-use-audit android-app/tools/check_cloud_gl.py:41 Detected subprocess function 'run' without a static string. If this data can be controlled by a malicious actor, it may be an instance of command injection. Audit the use of this call to ensure it is not controllable by an external... Static analysis (opengrep)
high opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.dangerous-subprocess-use-tainted-env-args android-app/tools/check_cloud_gl.py:41 Detected subprocess function 'run' with user controlled data. A malicious actor could leverage this to perform command injection. You may consider using 'shlex.quote()'. [confidence medium] Static analysis (opengrep)
high opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.dangerous-subprocess-use-audit processing/benchmark.py:111 Detected subprocess function 'run' without a static string. If this data can be controlled by a malicious actor, it may be an instance of command injection. Audit the use of this call to ensure it is not controllable by an external... Static analysis (opengrep)
high opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.dangerous-subprocess-use-audit processing/densify.py:68 Detected subprocess function 'run' without a static string. If this data can be controlled by a malicious actor, it may be an instance of command injection. Audit the use of this call to ensure it is not controllable by an external... Static analysis (opengrep)
high opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.dangerous-subprocess-use-tainted-env-args processing/densify.py:68 Detected subprocess function 'run' with user controlled data. A malicious actor could leverage this to perform command injection. You may consider using 'shlex.quote()'. [confidence medium] Static analysis (opengrep)
medium zizmor/artipacked .github/workflows/ci.yml:21 credential persistence through GitHub Actions artifacts [confidence low] CI workflows (zizmor)
medium zizmor/artipacked .github/workflows/ci.yml:34 credential persistence through GitHub Actions artifacts [confidence low] CI workflows (zizmor)
medium opengrep/java.android.security.exported_activity android-app/app/src/main/AndroidManifest.xml:8 The application exports an activity. Any application on the device can launch the exported activity which may compromise the integrity of your application or its data. Ensure that any exported activities do not have privileged access... Static analysis (opengrep)

Tools and coverage

Every analyzer that ran on this commit. A failed or skipped tool is a coverage gap: its share of the score is left out and the coverage figure drops.

AnalyzerPillarStatusVersionFindingsNote
AI tool configurationAI provenanceoksignatures-v10
Explicit AI attributionAI provenanceoksignatures-v10
Release velocityAI provenanceskipped—0
Coding styleAI provenanceok—0
Commit velocityAI provenanceokprov-50
Complexity (lizard)Code qualityoklizard 1.25.10
DocumentationCode qualityok—0
Duplication (jscpd)Code qualityokrepotrust-dup-w60
LintCode qualityokopengrep 1.33.1; rules f1d2b562b4140
Tests and CICode qualityok—0
Type safetyCode qualityok—0
CI workflows (zizmor)Securityokzizmor 1.32.02
Dependencies (osv-scanner)Securityskipped—0
Release downloadsSecurityok—0
Security postureSecurityok—0
Package registriesSecurityskipped—0no registry dependencies declared
Static analysis (opengrep)Securityokopengrep 1.33.1; rules f1d2b562b4148
OpenSSF ScorecardSecurityskipped—0no published OpenSSF Scorecard result for this repo
Secrets (gitleaks)Securityokgitleaks 8.30.10

Score history

ScoredCommitScoringAI provenanceQualitySecurity
2026-11-14dbd6f4e3c616prov-5+qual-2+sec-20%7665

Embed a badge

Maintainers can show these in a README. Badges update when the repository is re-scored.

[![RepoTrust ai](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/badge/github.com/faizfahmi77/ScanDot/ai.svg)](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/r/github.com/faizfahmi77/ScanDot/)
[![RepoTrust quality](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/badge/github.com/faizfahmi77/ScanDot/quality.svg)](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/r/github.com/faizfahmi77/ScanDot/)
[![RepoTrust security](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/badge/github.com/faizfahmi77/ScanDot/security.svg)](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/r/github.com/faizfahmi77/ScanDot/)
Full text report
  • Repository: https://github.com/faizfahmi77/ScanDot
  • Commit: dbd6f4e3c616a565685b4353ae71b16bdf49ba3b
  • Generated: 2026-11-14T15:04:01+00:00
  • Scorer 0.1.0, scoring prov-5+qual-2+sec-2, report schema v2

Scores

Pillar Score Signal Confidence Coverage
AI provenance (estimated AI-generated share) 0 none-detected 41% 100%
Code quality 76 adequate 90% 100%
Security 65 weak 85% 100%

AI provenance

No AI attribution or AI-consistent velocity signals detected.

  • Explicitly attributed share (lower bound): 0.0%
  • Unattributed share in AI-consistent velocity bursts: 0.0%
  • Estimated AI-generated share: 0.0%
Month Lines added Attributed to AI
2026-11 5,842 0%

AI provenance describes how code was produced; it is not a quality judgment. Unless attribution is explicit, these are signals consistent with AI generation, not proof. Squash/rebase workflows, imported code, and rewritten history reduce accuracy.

Code quality

Code quality is adequate: test-to-source ratio 0.40, CI runs tests; 37% of function code in complex or long functions; 0% duplicated lines. Weakest area: complexity.

Area Score
Complexity (lizard) 33
Duplication 100
Code smells (Opengrep) 100
Tests and CI 85
Documentation 80
Type safety 40
Process (Scorecard review/maintenance) n/a
  • Functions: 163; mean complexity 4.0, 90th percentile 8; 9 complex and 1 long functions
  • Duplicated lines: 0.0% of 2,129 compared
  • Tests: 1,142 test lines for 2,831 source lines (ratio 0.40); CI test commands: unittest; 100% of recent source commits also change tests
  • Docs missing or thin: changelog

Most complex functions:

Security

Security posture is weak: 7 high-severity SAST findings. Weakest area: posture.

Area Score
Secrets (gitleaks, tree + history) 100
Static analysis (Opengrep) 32
Vulnerable dependencies (OSV) n/a
CI workflows (zizmor) 96
Posture (policy, updates, signing, lockfiles) 0
OpenSSF Scorecard n/a
  • Posture checks passed: lockfiles; missing: security policy, dependency updates, signed commits

Top findings

Severity Finding Location
high opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.dangerous-subprocess-use-audit: Detected subprocess function 'run' without a static string. If this data can be controlled by a malicious actor, it may be an instance of command injection. Audit the use of this call to ensure it is not controllable by an external resource. You may consider using 'shlex.escape()'. [confidence low] android-app/tools/check_cloud_gl.py:38
high opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.dangerous-subprocess-use-tainted-env-args: Detected subprocess function 'run' with user controlled data. A malicious actor could leverage this to perform command injection. You may consider using 'shlex.quote()'. [confidence medium] android-app/tools/check_cloud_gl.py:38
high opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.dangerous-subprocess-use-audit: Detected subprocess function 'run' without a static string. If this data can be controlled by a malicious actor, it may be an instance of command injection. Audit the use of this call to ensure it is not controllable by an external resource. You may consider using 'shlex.escape()'. [confidence low] android-app/tools/check_cloud_gl.py:41
high opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.dangerous-subprocess-use-tainted-env-args: Detected subprocess function 'run' with user controlled data. A malicious actor could leverage this to perform command injection. You may consider using 'shlex.quote()'. [confidence medium] android-app/tools/check_cloud_gl.py:41
high opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.dangerous-subprocess-use-audit: Detected subprocess function 'run' without a static string. If this data can be controlled by a malicious actor, it may be an instance of command injection. Audit the use of this call to ensure it is not controllable by an external resource. You may consider using 'shlex.escape()'. [confidence low] processing/benchmark.py:111
high opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.dangerous-subprocess-use-audit: Detected subprocess function 'run' without a static string. If this data can be controlled by a malicious actor, it may be an instance of command injection. Audit the use of this call to ensure it is not controllable by an external resource. You may consider using 'shlex.escape()'. [confidence low] processing/densify.py:68
high opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.dangerous-subprocess-use-tainted-env-args: Detected subprocess function 'run' with user controlled data. A malicious actor could leverage this to perform command injection. You may consider using 'shlex.quote()'. [confidence medium] processing/densify.py:68
medium opengrep/java.android.security.exported_activity: The application exports an activity. Any application on the device can launch the exported activity which may compromise the integrity of your application or its data. Ensure that any exported activities do not have privileged access to your application's control plane. [confidence medium] android-app/app/src/main/AndroidManifest.xml:8
medium zizmor/artipacked: credential persistence through GitHub Actions artifacts [confidence low] .github/workflows/ci.yml:21
medium zizmor/artipacked: credential persistence through GitHub Actions artifacts [confidence low] .github/workflows/ci.yml:34

Static signals only: the scorer never runs the project's code. Secret findings are pattern matches that were not verified, and secret values are never stored.

Distribution signals

Signals consistent with a repository that exists to distribute a download. They are heuristics, not a verdict; release files were not downloaded or inspected.

Repository profile

  • Source lines: 2,831; test lines: 1,142
Language Lines
Kotlin 2,626
Python 1,226
PowerShell 88
Java 33