Leaderboard github.com
elthommy/privy-council
A private council of AI personas that debates your questions, on local models, your Claude subscription, or both.
AI provenance
12%
explicit
- Confidence
- 85%
- Coverage
- 100%
Estimated share of AI-generated code. Explicit attribution is a lower bound.
Code quality
89/100
strong
- Confidence
- 90%
- Coverage
- 100%
Complexity, duplication, lint density, tests, CI, docs and review process.
Security
80/100
adequate
- Confidence
- 85%
- Coverage
- 100%
Secrets, static analysis, vulnerable dependencies, CI and supply-chain posture.
AI provenance
12% explicit
Explicit AI attribution on 12% of first-party code added; an estimated 12% including velocity signals.
How the score is built
- Explicitly attributed share12%
- Unattributed share in AI-pace bursts0%
- Estimated AI-generated share12%
- AI tool configuration files1
- Work sessions at AI pace0
- Releases at AI pacenot measured
- Coding-style index (1.0+ means possible)0.00
Attributed AI tools
| Tool | Commits | Lines added | First seen | Last seen |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Code | 53 | 4,192 | 2026-10-28 | 2026-11-13 |
Lines added per month all AI-attributed share
- 2026-1030,988 · 2% AI
- 2026-113,494 · 100% AI
Findings in AI-attributed lines vs the rest
From git blame: 2,603 lines trace to AI-attributed commits, 18,489 to others. Reported, not scored.
| Findings per 1,000 lines | AI-attributed | Other | Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|
| Code quality | 1.54 | 0.49 | 3.16× |
| Security | 0.00 | 0.49 | 0.00× |
Evidence by analyzer
Explicit AI attributionok26 items
- Claude Code: 53 attributed commits, 4,192 lines added
- Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude'
- Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude'
- Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude'
- Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude'
- Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude'
- Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude'
- Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude'
- Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude'
- Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude'
- Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude'
- Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude'
- Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude'
- Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude'
- Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude'
- Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude'
- Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude'
- Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude'
- Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude'
- Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude'
- Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude'
- Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude'
- Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude'
- Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude'
- Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude'
- Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude'
- attributed_commit_share
- 85.5%
- attributed_commits
- 53
- attributed_loc
- 4,192
- attributed_loc_share
- 12.2%
- commits
- 62
- effective_loc
- 34,482
- tools_detected
- 1
AI tool configurationok1 item
- artifacts
- 1
- earliest_adoption
- 2026-10-28
- tools_configured
- 1
- workflow_agents
- 0
Commit velocityok
- excluded_import_loc
- 30,290
- flagged_loc
- 0
- flagged_loc_share
- 0.0%
- flagged_units
- 0
- max_loc_per_hour
- 242.57
- measured_loc
- 4,192
- median_loc_per_hour
- 70.75
- pr_timed_units
- 0
- pre_ai_era_burst_loc
- 0
- pre_ai_era_bursts
- 0
- pre_ai_era_measured_loc
- 0
- work_units
- 22
Release velocityskipped
Coding styleok
- count:assistant_voice
- 0
- count:emoji_in_code
- 0
- count:narrated_steps
- 0
- count:placeholder
- 0
- files:assistant_voice
- 0
- files:emoji_in_code
- 0
- files:narrated_steps
- 0
- files:placeholder
- 0
- index
- 0
- lines_scanned
- 21,092
- per_kloc:assistant_voice
- 0
- per_kloc:emoji_in_code
- 0
- per_kloc:narrated_steps
- 0
- per_kloc:placeholder
- 0
Findings in AI-written linesok
- ai_lines
- 2,603
- blame_failures
- 0
- files_blamed
- 107
- other_lines
- 18,489
- quality:ai_findings
- 4
- quality:ai_per_kloc
- 1.54
- quality:other_findings
- 9
- quality:other_per_kloc
- 0.49
- quality:ratio
- 3.16
- security:ai_findings
- 0
- security:ai_per_kloc
- 0
- security:other_findings
- 9
- security:other_per_kloc
- 0.49
- security:ratio
- 0
Code quality
89 strong
Code quality is strong: test-to-source ratio 0.62, CI runs tests; 3% of function code in complex or long functions; 1% duplicated lines. Weakest area: type safety.
How the score is built
- Complexity90
- Duplication94
- Lint and smells74
- Tests and CI100
- Documentation85
- Type safety60
- Review processnot measured
Evidence by analyzer
Complexity (lizard)ok10 items
- dispatch in src/privy_council/repl.py: complexity 34, 80 lines
- _derived in src/privy_council/engine/checks.py: complexity 33, 35 lines
- figures in src/privy_council/engine/checks.py: complexity 26, 39 lines
- _markdown_line in src/privy_council/storage/sessions.py: complexity 26, 36 lines
- score_line in scripts/chair_bench.py: complexity 25, 25 lines
- _shares in src/privy_council/engine/checks.py: complexity 24, 18 lines
- figure_flaws in src/privy_council/engine/checks.py: complexity 22, 49 lines
- _on_stream_event in src/privy_council/backends/claude_cli.py: complexity 17, 24 lines
- _columns in src/privy_council/engine/dossier.py: complexity 17, 19 lines
- _add_event in scripts/label_rounds.py: complexity 16, 16 lines
- complex_functions
- 11
- function_nloc
- 11,044
- functions
- 1,089
- long_functions
- 0
- many_param_functions
- 7
- mean_ccn
- 3.97
- p90_ccn
- 8
- risky_nloc_share
- 3.4%
Duplication (jscpd)ok10 items
- 6+ duplicated lines: scripts/chair_bench.py:235 and scripts/replay_moderation.py:98
- 6+ duplicated lines: scripts/live_memory_check.py:83 and src/privy_council/cli.py:379
- 6+ duplicated lines: scripts/replay_moderation.py:158 and scripts/replay_turn.py:110
- 6+ duplicated lines: scripts/replay_notes.py:78 and src/privy_council/engine/memory_flow.py:142
- 6+ duplicated lines: scripts/spike_claude.py:77 and src/privy_council/backends/claude_cli.py:205
- 6+ duplicated lines: src/privy_council/compare/runner.py:28 and src/privy_council/export/report.py:14
- 6+ duplicated lines: src/privy_council/engine/protocol.py:284 and src/privy_council/engine/protocol.py:302
- 6+ duplicated lines: src/privy_council/engine/protocol.py:514 and src/privy_council/engine/review_flow.py:107
- 6+ duplicated lines: src/privy_council/engine/resume.py:29 and src/privy_council/export/report.py:16
- 6+ duplicated lines: src/privy_council/export/html.py:13 and src/privy_council/export/markdown.py:10
- compared_lines
- 16,108
- duplicated_lines
- 180
- duplicated_share
- 1.1%
- files
- 107
Lintok
- category:best-practice
- 3
- category:correctness
- 2
- category:maintainability
- 8
- findings
- 13
- scanned_lines
- 21,092
- weighted_findings
- 25
Tests and CIok3 items
- CI config: .github/workflows/ci.yml
.github/workflows/ci.yml - CI runs tests (pytest)
- CI runs linters (ruff, pre-commit)
- check:ci_present
- yes
- check:ci_runs_lint
- yes
- check:ci_runs_tests
- yes
- check:has_tests
- yes
- check:test_ratio
- yes
- check:tests_cochange
- yes
- ci_files
- 1
- cochange_commits
- 33
- cochange_share
- 81.8%
- source_lines
- 21,092
- test_lines
- 12,988
- test_ratio
- 0.62
Documentationok3 items
- README.md
README.md - LICENSE
LICENSE - CHANGELOG.md
CHANGELOG.md
- check:changelog
- yes
- check:contributing
- no
- check:license
- yes
- check:readme
- yes
- readme_lines
- 255
Type safetyok1 item
- Python strict type checking: pyproject.toml
pyproject.toml
- check:low_escape_density
- no
- check:strict_config
- yes
- escapes
- 167
- escapes_per_kloc
- 7.94
Security
80 adequate
Security posture is adequate: 8 high-severity SAST findings; 5 high-severity workflow issues. Weakest area: ci actions.
How the score is built
- Secrets100
- Static analysis (SAST)90
- Vulnerable dependencies100
- CI workflows32
- Security posture40
- OpenSSF Scorecardnot measured
Evidence by analyzer
OpenSSF Scorecardskipped
no published OpenSSF Scorecard result for this repo
Package registriesok
- checked
- 14
- declared
- 14
- lookup_errors
- 0
- missing
- 0
- recent
- 0
Secrets (gitleaks)ok
- secrets_current
- 0
- secrets_history
- 0
- secrets_low_confidence
- 0
- secrets_nonprod
- 0
Static analysis (opengrep)ok
- findings
- 9
- findings_high
- 8
- findings_low
- 0
- findings_medium
- 1
- parse_errors
- 5
- scanned_lines
- 21,092
- weighted_findings
- 6.25
Dependencies (osv-scanner)ok
- penalty
- 0
- vulnerabilities
- 0
- vulnerable_packages
- 0
- vulns_critical
- 0
- vulns_high
- 0
- vulns_low
- 0
- vulns_medium
- 0
- vulns_unknown
- 0
CI workflows (zizmor)ok
- findings
- 10
- findings_high
- 5
- findings_low
- 3
- findings_medium
- 2
- penalty
- 68.90
- workflows
- 1
Security postureok1 item
- Dependency updates: .github/dependabot.yml
.github/dependabot.yml
- check:dependency_updates
- yes
- check:lockfiles
- yes
- check:security_policy
- no
- check:signed_commits
- no
- signed_commit_share
- 12.9%
- unpinned_manifests
- 0
Release downloadsok
- binary_assets
- 0
- signals
- 0
- suspicious
- 0
Findings
19 high10 medium3 low
32 findings
| Severity | Rule | Location | Message | Tool |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| high | opengrep/python.lang.best-practice.arbitrary-sleep |
scripts/live_session.py:135 | time.sleep() call; did you mean to leave this in? | Lint |
| high | opengrep/python.lang.best-practice.arbitrary-sleep |
scripts/live_session.py:153 | time.sleep() call; did you mean to leave this in? | Lint |
| high | opengrep/python.lang.best-practice.arbitrary-sleep |
scripts/num_batch_bench.py:59 | time.sleep() call; did you mean to leave this in? | Lint |
| high | opengrep/python.lang.maintainability.useless-inner-function |
src/privy_council/chat/discord_bot.py:260 | function `ask` is defined inside a function but never used | Lint |
| high | opengrep/python.lang.maintainability.useless-inner-function |
src/privy_council/chat/discord_bot.py:271 | function `run` is defined inside a function but never used | Lint |
| high | opengrep/python.lang.maintainability.useless-inner-function |
src/privy_council/chat/discord_bot.py:280 | function `handover` is defined inside a function but never used | Lint |
| high | zizmor/unpinned-uses |
.github/workflows/ci.yml:20 | unpinned action reference [confidence high] | CI workflows (zizmor) |
| high | zizmor/unpinned-uses |
.github/workflows/ci.yml:21 | unpinned action reference [confidence high] | CI workflows (zizmor) |
| high | zizmor/unpinned-uses |
.github/workflows/ci.yml:41 | unpinned action reference [confidence high] | CI workflows (zizmor) |
| high | zizmor/unpinned-uses |
.github/workflows/ci.yml:62 | unpinned action reference [confidence high] | CI workflows (zizmor) |
| high | zizmor/unpinned-uses |
.github/workflows/ci.yml:63 | unpinned action reference [confidence high] | CI workflows (zizmor) |
| high | opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.dangerous-subprocess-use-audit |
scripts/live_session.py:163 | Detected subprocess function 'Popen' without a static string. If this data can be controlled by a malicious actor, it may be an instance of command injection. Audit the use of this call to ensure it is not controllable by an external... | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| high | opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.dangerous-subprocess-use-audit |
scripts/ollama_import_sharded.py:72 | Detected subprocess function 'run' without a static string. If this data can be controlled by a malicious actor, it may be an instance of command injection. Audit the use of this call to ensure it is not controllable by an external... | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| high | opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.dangerous-asyncio-create-exec-audit |
scripts/spike_claude.py:76 | Detected 'create_subprocess_exec' function without a static string. If this data can be controlled by a malicious actor, it may be an instance of command injection. Audit the use of this call to ensure it is not controllable by an... | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| high | opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.dangerous-asyncio-create-exec-audit |
scripts/spike_claude_stream.py:50 | Detected 'create_subprocess_exec' function without a static string. If this data can be controlled by a malicious actor, it may be an instance of command injection. Audit the use of this call to ensure it is not controllable by an... | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| high | opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.dangerous-asyncio-create-exec-audit |
scripts/spike_claude_stream.py:86 | Detected 'create_subprocess_exec' function without a static string. If this data can be controlled by a malicious actor, it may be an instance of command injection. Audit the use of this call to ensure it is not controllable by an... | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| high | opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.dangerous-asyncio-create-exec-audit |
src/privy_council/backends/claude_cli.py:204 | Detected 'create_subprocess_exec' function without a static string. If this data can be controlled by a malicious actor, it may be an instance of command injection. Audit the use of this call to ensure it is not controllable by an... | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| high | opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.dangerous-asyncio-create-exec-audit |
src/privy_council/search/container.py:45 | Detected 'create_subprocess_exec' function without a static string. If this data can be controlled by a malicious actor, it may be an instance of command injection. Audit the use of this call to ensure it is not controllable by an... | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| high | opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.dangerous-asyncio-create-exec-tainted-env-args |
src/privy_council/search/container.py:45 | Detected 'create_subprocess_exec' function with user controlled data. You may consider using 'shlex.escape()'. [confidence low] | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| medium | opengrep/python.lang.correctness.common-mistakes.string-concat-in-list |
scripts/label_rounds.py:214 | Detected strings that are implicitly concatenated inside a list. Python will implicitly concatenate strings when not explicitly delimited. Was this supposed to be individual elements of the list? | Lint |
| medium | opengrep/python.lang.maintainability.return-not-in-function |
src/privy_council/compare/store.py:59 | `return` only makes sense inside a function | Lint |
| medium | opengrep/python.lang.maintainability.return-not-in-function |
src/privy_council/engine/budget.py:61 | `return` only makes sense inside a function | Lint |
| medium | opengrep/python.lang.maintainability.return-not-in-function |
src/privy_council/models/research.py:32 | `return` only makes sense inside a function | Lint |
| medium | opengrep/python.lang.correctness.common-mistakes.string-concat-in-list |
src/privy_council/repl.py:130 | Detected strings that are implicitly concatenated inside a list. Python will implicitly concatenate strings when not explicitly delimited. Was this supposed to be individual elements of the list? | Lint |
| medium | opengrep/python.lang.maintainability.is-function-without-parentheses |
src/privy_council/tui/app.py:312 | Is "is_running" a function or an attribute? If it is a function, you may have meant w.is_running() because w.is_running is always true. | Lint |
| medium | opengrep/python.lang.maintainability.is-function-without-parentheses |
src/privy_council/tui/widgets.py:460 | Is "is_empty" a function or an attribute? If it is a function, you may have meant self.selection.is_empty() because self.selection.is_empty is always true. | Lint |
| medium | zizmor/dependabot-cooldown |
.github/dependabot.yml:20 | insufficient cooldown in Dependabot updates [confidence high] | CI workflows (zizmor) |
| medium | zizmor/dependabot-cooldown |
.github/dependabot.yml:6 | insufficient cooldown in Dependabot updates [confidence high] | CI workflows (zizmor) |
| medium | opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.dynamic-urllib-use-detected |
scripts/spike_ollama.py:33 | Detected a dynamic value being used with urllib. urllib supports 'file://' schemes, so a dynamic value controlled by a malicious actor may allow them to read arbitrary files. Audit uses of urllib calls to ensure user data cannot control... | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| low | zizmor/artipacked |
.github/workflows/ci.yml:20 | credential persistence through GitHub Actions artifacts [confidence low] | CI workflows (zizmor) |
| low | zizmor/artipacked |
.github/workflows/ci.yml:41 | credential persistence through GitHub Actions artifacts [confidence low] | CI workflows (zizmor) |
| low | zizmor/artipacked |
.github/workflows/ci.yml:62 | credential persistence through GitHub Actions artifacts [confidence low] | CI workflows (zizmor) |
Tools and coverage
Every analyzer that ran on this commit. A failed or skipped tool is a coverage gap: its share of the score is left out and the coverage figure drops.
| Analyzer | Pillar | Status | Version | Findings | Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI tool configuration | AI provenance | ok | signatures-v1 | 0 | |
| Explicit AI attribution | AI provenance | ok | signatures-v1 | 0 | |
| Release velocity | AI provenance | skipped | — | 0 | |
| Coding style | AI provenance | ok | — | 0 | |
| Commit velocity | AI provenance | ok | prov-4 | 0 | |
| Findings in AI-written lines | AI provenance | ok | git-blame | 0 | |
| Complexity (lizard) | Code quality | ok | lizard 1.25.1 | 0 | |
| Documentation | Code quality | ok | — | 0 | |
| Duplication (jscpd) | Code quality | ok | repotrust-dup-w6 | 0 | |
| Lint | Code quality | ok | opengrep 1.33.1; rules f1d2b562b414 | 13 | |
| Tests and CI | Code quality | ok | — | 0 | |
| Type safety | Code quality | ok | — | 0 | |
| CI workflows (zizmor) | Security | ok | zizmor 1.32.0 | 10 | |
| Dependencies (osv-scanner) | Security | ok | osv-scanner version: 2.7.1 | 0 | |
| Release downloads | Security | ok | — | 0 | |
| Security posture | Security | ok | — | 0 | |
| Package registries | Security | ok | — | 0 | |
| Static analysis (opengrep) | Security | ok | opengrep 1.33.1; rules f1d2b562b414 | 9 | |
| OpenSSF Scorecard | Security | skipped | — | 0 | no published OpenSSF Scorecard result for this repo |
| Secrets (gitleaks) | Security | ok | gitleaks 8.30.1 | 0 |
Score history
Scores from different scoring versions aren't directly comparable.
| Scored | Commit | Scoring | AI provenance | Quality | Security |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-11-14 | c869ce38e8b7 | prov-5+qual-2+sec-2 | 12% | 89 | 80 |
| 2026-11-14 | c869ce38e8b7 | prov-4+qual-2+sec-2 | 12% | 89 | 80 |
Full text report
- Repository: https://github.com/elthommy/privy-council
- Commit:
c869ce38e8b7b5c45767972f097dda63d8528343 - Generated: 2026-11-14T14:52:04+00:00
- Scorer 0.1.0, scoring prov-5+qual-2+sec-2, report schema v2
Scores
| Pillar | Score | Signal | Confidence | Coverage |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI provenance (estimated AI-generated share) | 12 | explicit | 85% | 100% |
| Code quality | 89 | strong | 90% | 100% |
| Security | 80 | adequate | 85% | 100% |
AI provenance
Explicit AI attribution on 12% of first-party code added; an estimated 12% including velocity signals.
- Explicitly attributed share (lower bound): 12.2%
- Unattributed share in AI-consistent velocity bursts: 0.0%
- Estimated AI-generated share: 12.2%
| AI tool | Attributed commits | Lines added |
|---|---|---|
| Claude Code | 53 | 4,192 |
- AI tooling configured in repo: claude-code
Current source lines last changed by AI-attributed commits: 2,603 of 21,092.
| Findings per 1,000 lines | AI-attributed | Other | Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|
| Quality | 1.537 | 0.487 | 3.16x |
| Security | 0.0 | 0.487 | 0.0x |
| Month | Lines added | Attributed to AI |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-10 | 30,988 | 2% |
| 2026-11 | 3,494 | 100% |
Evidence
- Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (3c10c9abdd0d)
- Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (4015b75c6ed9)
- Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (4fea7746cba0)
- Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (dbcacb9dbd0b)
- Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (65a87cd9c922)
- Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (95aa47a487e7)
- Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (11fd3d7d91a8)
- Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (ecf81bc06ca6)
- Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (1c4a02830dd1)
- Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (39e446530420)
- Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (105035dbd399)
- Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (4a0f4be64478)
- Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (d7899d2f537f)
- Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (36c3c76e536d)
- Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (8267b6e572f0)
AI provenance describes how code was produced; it is not a quality judgment. Unless attribution is explicit, these are signals consistent with AI generation, not proof. Squash/rebase workflows, imported code, and rewritten history reduce accuracy.
Code quality
Code quality is strong: test-to-source ratio 0.62, CI runs tests; 3% of function code in complex or long functions; 1% duplicated lines. Weakest area: type safety.
| Area | Score |
|---|---|
| Complexity (lizard) | 90 |
| Duplication | 94 |
| Code smells (Opengrep) | 74 |
| Tests and CI | 100 |
| Documentation | 85 |
| Type safety | 60 |
| Process (Scorecard review/maintenance) | n/a |
- Functions: 1,089; mean complexity 4.0, 90th percentile 8; 11 complex and 0 long functions
- Duplicated lines: 1.1% of 16,108 compared
- Tests: 12,988 test lines for 21,092 source lines (ratio 0.62); CI test commands: pytest; 82% of recent source commits also change tests
- Docs missing or thin: contributing
Most complex functions:
- dispatch in src/privy_council/repl.py: complexity 34, 80 lines
- _derived in src/privy_council/engine/checks.py: complexity 33, 35 lines
- figures in src/privy_council/engine/checks.py: complexity 26, 39 lines
- _markdown_line in src/privy_council/storage/sessions.py: complexity 26, 36 lines
- score_line in scripts/chair_bench.py: complexity 25, 25 lines
Security
Security posture is adequate: 8 high-severity SAST findings; 5 high-severity workflow issues. Weakest area: ci actions.
| Area | Score |
|---|---|
| Secrets (gitleaks, tree + history) | 100 |
| Static analysis (Opengrep) | 90 |
| Vulnerable dependencies (OSV) | 100 |
| CI workflows (zizmor) | 32 |
| Posture (policy, updates, signing, lockfiles) | 40 |
| OpenSSF Scorecard | n/a |
- Posture checks passed: dependency updates, lockfiles; missing: security policy, signed commits
Top findings
| Severity | Finding | Location |
|---|---|---|
| high | opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.dangerous-subprocess-use-audit: Detected subprocess function 'Popen' without a static string. If this data can be controlled by a malicious actor, it may be an instance of command injection. Audit the use of this call to ensure it is not controllable by an external resource. You may consider using 'shlex.escape()'. [confidence low] |
scripts/live_session.py:163 |
| high | opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.dangerous-subprocess-use-audit: Detected subprocess function 'run' without a static string. If this data can be controlled by a malicious actor, it may be an instance of command injection. Audit the use of this call to ensure it is not controllable by an external resource. You may consider using 'shlex.escape()'. [confidence low] |
scripts/ollama_import_sharded.py:72 |
| high | opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.dangerous-asyncio-create-exec-audit: Detected 'create_subprocess_exec' function without a static string. If this data can be controlled by a malicious actor, it may be an instance of command injection. Audit the use of this call to ensure it is not controllable by an external resource. You may consider using 'shlex.escape()'. [confidence low] |
scripts/spike_claude.py:76 |
| high | opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.dangerous-asyncio-create-exec-audit: Detected 'create_subprocess_exec' function without a static string. If this data can be controlled by a malicious actor, it may be an instance of command injection. Audit the use of this call to ensure it is not controllable by an external resource. You may consider using 'shlex.escape()'. [confidence low] |
scripts/spike_claude_stream.py:50 |
| high | opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.dangerous-asyncio-create-exec-audit: Detected 'create_subprocess_exec' function without a static string. If this data can be controlled by a malicious actor, it may be an instance of command injection. Audit the use of this call to ensure it is not controllable by an external resource. You may consider using 'shlex.escape()'. [confidence low] |
scripts/spike_claude_stream.py:86 |
| high | opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.dangerous-asyncio-create-exec-audit: Detected 'create_subprocess_exec' function without a static string. If this data can be controlled by a malicious actor, it may be an instance of command injection. Audit the use of this call to ensure it is not controllable by an external resource. You may consider using 'shlex.escape()'. [confidence low] |
src/privy_council/backends/claude_cli.py:204 |
| high | opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.dangerous-asyncio-create-exec-audit: Detected 'create_subprocess_exec' function without a static string. If this data can be controlled by a malicious actor, it may be an instance of command injection. Audit the use of this call to ensure it is not controllable by an external resource. You may consider using 'shlex.escape()'. [confidence low] |
src/privy_council/search/container.py:45 |
| high | opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.dangerous-asyncio-create-exec-tainted-env-args: Detected 'create_subprocess_exec' function with user controlled data. You may consider using 'shlex.escape()'. [confidence low] |
src/privy_council/search/container.py:45 |
| high | zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] |
.github/workflows/ci.yml:20 |
| high | zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] |
.github/workflows/ci.yml:21 |
| high | zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] |
.github/workflows/ci.yml:41 |
| high | zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] |
.github/workflows/ci.yml:62 |
| high | zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] |
.github/workflows/ci.yml:63 |
| medium | opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.dynamic-urllib-use-detected: Detected a dynamic value being used with urllib. urllib supports 'file://' schemes, so a dynamic value controlled by a malicious actor may allow them to read arbitrary files. Audit uses of urllib calls to ensure user data cannot control the URLs, or consider using the 'requests' library instead. [confidence low] |
scripts/spike_ollama.py:33 |
| medium | zizmor/dependabot-cooldown: insufficient cooldown in Dependabot updates [confidence high] |
.github/dependabot.yml:6 |
| medium | zizmor/dependabot-cooldown: insufficient cooldown in Dependabot updates [confidence high] |
.github/dependabot.yml:20 |
| low | zizmor/artipacked: credential persistence through GitHub Actions artifacts [confidence low] |
.github/workflows/ci.yml:20 |
| low | zizmor/artipacked: credential persistence through GitHub Actions artifacts [confidence low] |
.github/workflows/ci.yml:41 |
| low | zizmor/artipacked: credential persistence through GitHub Actions artifacts [confidence low] |
.github/workflows/ci.yml:62 |
Static signals only: the scorer never runs the project's code. Secret findings are pattern matches that were not verified, and secret values are never stored.
Repository profile
- Source lines: 21,092; test lines: 12,988
| Language | Lines |
|---|---|
| Python | 34,015 |
| Shell | 65 |