Leaderboard github.com
elementalui/elemental
A flexible and beautiful UI framework for React.js
AI provenance
0%
none-detected
- Confidence
- 65%
- Coverage
- 100%
Estimated share of AI-generated code. Explicit attribution is a lower bound.
Code quality
38/100
poor
- Confidence
- 90%
- Coverage
- 100%
Complexity, duplication, lint density, tests, CI, docs and review process.
Security
72/100
adequate
- Confidence
- 85%
- Coverage
- 100%
Secrets, static analysis, vulnerable dependencies, CI and supply-chain posture.
AI provenance
0% none-detected
No AI attribution or AI-consistent velocity signals detected.
How the score is built
- Explicitly attributed share0%
- Unattributed share in AI-pace bursts0%
- Estimated AI-generated share0%
- AI tool configuration files0
- Work sessions at AI pace0
- Releases at AI pace0
- Coding-style index (1.0+ means possible)0.00
Lines added per month all AI-attributed share
- 2015-045,499 · 0% AI
- 2015-052,450 · 0% AI
- 2015-061,394 · 0% AI
- 2015-072,412 · 0% AI
- 2015-081,371 · 0% AI
- 2015-09736 · 0% AI
- 2015-10217 · 0% AI
- 2015-11121 · 0% AI
- 2015-12348 · 0% AI
- 2016-0164 · 0% AI
- 2016-0217 · 0% AI
- 2016-0326 · 0% AI
- 2016-040 · 0% AI
- 2016-0548 · 0% AI
- 2016-0744 · 0% AI
- 2016-08111 · 0% AI
- 2016-09140 · 0% AI
- 2016-1110 · 0% AI
- 2017-0525 · 0% AI
- 2017-061 · 0% AI
- 2017-09217 · 0% AI
- 2017-10627 · 0% AI
- 2017-117 · 0% AI
Evidence by analyzer
Explicit AI attributionok
- attributed_commit_share
- 0.0%
- attributed_commits
- 0
- attributed_loc
- 0
- attributed_loc_share
- 0.0%
- commits
- 723
- effective_loc
- 15,885
- tools_detected
- 0
AI tool configurationok
- artifacts
- 0
- tools_configured
- 0
- workflow_agents
- 0
Commit velocityok
- excluded_import_loc
- 0
- flagged_loc
- 0
- flagged_loc_share
- 0.0%
- flagged_units
- 0
- max_loc_per_hour
- 433.36
- measured_loc
- 15,885
- median_loc_per_hour
- 54.85
- pr_timed_units
- 0
- pre_ai_era_burst_loc
- 0
- pre_ai_era_bursts
- 0
- pre_ai_era_measured_loc
- 15,885
- work_units
- 231
Release velocityok
- flagged_releases
- 0
- max_loc_per_day
- 2,038.60
- releases
- 42
Coding styleok
- count:assistant_voice
- 0
- count:emoji_in_code
- 0
- count:narrated_steps
- 0
- count:placeholder
- 0
- files:assistant_voice
- 0
- files:emoji_in_code
- 0
- files:narrated_steps
- 0
- files:placeholder
- 0
- index
- 0
- lines_scanned
- 5,990
- per_kloc:assistant_voice
- 0
- per_kloc:emoji_in_code
- 0
- per_kloc:narrated_steps
- 0
- per_kloc:placeholder
- 0
Code quality
38 poor
Code quality is poor: test-to-source ratio 0.02, no CI test run detected; 39% of function code in complex or long functions; 21% duplicated lines. Weakest area: process.
How the score is built
- Complexity31
- Duplication28
- Lint and smells64
- Tests and CI21
- Documentation85
- Type safetynot measured
- Review process20
Evidence by analyzer
Complexity (lizard)ok6 items
- render in src/components/Col.js: complexity 18, 35 lines
- render in src/components/ResponsiveText.js: complexity 16, 25 lines
- render in site/src/pages/Modal.js: complexity 5, 185 lines
- render in site/src/pages/Forms.js: complexity 2, 723 lines
- render in site/src/pages/Grid.js: complexity 1, 210 lines
- render in site/src/pages/Spinner.js: complexity 1, 115 lines
- complex_functions
- 2
- function_nloc
- 3,314
- functions
- 228
- long_functions
- 4
- many_param_functions
- 0
- mean_ccn
- 2.04
- p90_ccn
- 4
- risky_nloc_share
- 39.0%
Duplication (jscpd)ok10 items
- 6+ duplicated lines: site/src/pages/Buttons.js:146 and site/src/pages/Buttons.js:228
- 6+ duplicated lines: site/src/pages/Buttons.js:190 and site/src/pages/Glyphs.js:104
- 6+ duplicated lines: site/src/pages/Buttons.js:239 and site/src/pages/Misc.js:101
- 6+ duplicated lines: site/src/pages/Buttons.js:337 and site/src/pages/Spinner.js:118
- 6+ duplicated lines: site/src/pages/CSS.js:93 and site/src/pages/CSS.js:104
- 6+ duplicated lines: site/src/pages/Forms.js:131 and site/src/pages/Forms.js:146
- 6+ duplicated lines: site/src/pages/Forms.js:706 and site/src/pages/Glyphs.js:113
- 6+ duplicated lines: site/src/pages/Grid.js:22 and site/src/pages/Grid.js:36
- 6+ duplicated lines: site/src/pages/Misc.js:58 and site/src/pages/Misc.js:321
- 6+ duplicated lines: site/src/pages/Misc.js:400 and site/src/pages/Spinner.js:117
- compared_lines
- 4,831
- duplicated_lines
- 1,034
- duplicated_share
- 21.4%
- files
- 60
Lintok
- category:best-practice
- 1
- category:correctness
- 39
- findings
- 40
- scanned_lines
- 5,990
- weighted_findings
- 10.75
Tests and CIok
- check:ci_present
- no
- check:ci_runs_lint
- no
- check:ci_runs_tests
- no
- check:has_tests
- yes
- check:test_ratio
- no
- check:tests_cochange
- no
- ci_files
- 0
- cochange_commits
- 171
- cochange_share
- 0.6%
- source_lines
- 5,990
- test_lines
- 101
- test_ratio
- 0.02
Documentationok3 items
- README.md
README.md - LICENSE
LICENSE - HISTORY.md
HISTORY.md
- check:changelog
- yes
- check:contributing
- no
- check:license
- yes
- check:readme
- yes
- readme_lines
- 17
Type safetyskipped
Security
72 adequate
Security posture is adequate: no high-impact findings. Weakest area: posture.
How the score is built
- Secrets100
- Static analysis (SAST)96
- Vulnerable dependenciesnot measured
- CI workflowsnot measured
- Security posture0
- OpenSSF Scorecard25
Evidence by analyzer
OpenSSF Scorecardok9 items
- Scorecard Code-Review: 4/10 (Found 9/19 approved changesets -- score normalized to 4)
- Scorecard Maintained: 0/10 (0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0)
- Scorecard Binary-Artifacts: 10/10 (no binaries found in the repo)
- Scorecard CII-Best-Practices: 0/10 (no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected)
- Scorecard Security-Policy: 0/10 (security policy file not detected)
- Scorecard License: 10/10 (license file detected)
- Scorecard Fuzzing: 0/10 (project is not fuzzed)
- Scorecard Branch-Protection: 0/10 (branch protection not enabled on development/release branches)
- Scorecard SAST: 0/10 (SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0)
- aggregate
- 2.60
- check:Binary-Artifacts
- yes
- check:Branch-Protection
- no
- check:CII-Best-Practices
- no
- check:Code-Review
- yes
- check:Fuzzing
- no
- check:License
- yes
- check:Maintained
- no
- check:SAST
- no
- check:Security-Policy
- no
Package registriesok
- checked
- 20
- declared
- 20
- lookup_errors
- 0
- missing
- 0
- recent
- 0
Secrets (gitleaks)ok
- secrets_current
- 0
- secrets_history
- 0
- secrets_low_confidence
- 0
- secrets_nonprod
- 0
Static analysis (opengrep)ok
- findings
- 3
- findings_high
- 0
- findings_low
- 0
- findings_medium
- 3
- parse_errors
- 0
- scanned_lines
- 5,990
- weighted_findings
- 0.75
Dependencies (osv-scanner)skipped
CI workflows (zizmor)skipped
Security postureok1 item
- package.json has no lockfile alongside it (unpinned dependencies)
package.json
- check:dependency_updates
- no
- check:lockfiles
- no
- check:security_policy
- no
- check:signed_commits
- no
- signed_commit_share
- 0.5%
- unpinned_manifests
- 1
Release downloadsok
- binary_assets
- 0
- signals
- 0
- suspicious
- 0
Findings
4 medium39 low
43 findings
| Severity | Rule | Location | Message | Tool |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| medium | opengrep/javascript.lang.best-practice.javascript-alert |
site/src/pages/Forms.js:60 | found alert() call; should this be in production code? | Lint |
| medium | opengrep/javascript.lang.security.html-in-template-string |
site/src/pages/Buttons.js:87 | This template literal looks like HTML and has interpolated variables. These variables are not HTML-encoded by default. If the variables contain HTML tags, these may be interpreted by the browser, resulting in cross-site scripting (XSS).... | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| medium | opengrep/javascript.lang.security.html-in-template-string |
site/src/pages/Glyphs.js:39 | This template literal looks like HTML and has interpolated variables. These variables are not HTML-encoded by default. If the variables contain HTML tags, these may be interpreted by the browser, resulting in cross-site scripting (XSS).... | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| medium | opengrep/javascript.lang.security.audit.detect-redos |
src/components/EmailInputGroup.js:9 | Detected the use of a regular expression `^(([^<>()[\]\\.,;:\s@"]+(\.[^<>()[\]\\.,;:\s@"]+)*)|(".+"))@((\[[0-9]{1,3}\.[0-9]{1,3}\.[0-9]{1,3}\.[0-9]{1,3}])|(([a-zA-Z\-0-9]+\.)+[a-zA-Z]{2,}))$` which appears to be vulnerable to a Regular... | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| low | opengrep/bash.lang.correctness.unquoted-variable-expansion-in-command |
scripts/bower.sh:10 | Variable expansions must be double-quoted so as to prevent being split into multiple pieces according to whitespace or whichever separator is specified by the IFS variable. If you really wish to split the variable's contents, you may... | Lint |
| low | opengrep/bash.lang.correctness.unquoted-variable-expansion-in-command |
scripts/bower.sh:11 | Variable expansions must be double-quoted so as to prevent being split into multiple pieces according to whitespace or whichever separator is specified by the IFS variable. If you really wish to split the variable's contents, you may... | Lint |
| low | opengrep/bash.lang.correctness.unquoted-variable-expansion-in-command |
scripts/bower.sh:14 | Variable expansions must be double-quoted so as to prevent being split into multiple pieces according to whitespace or whichever separator is specified by the IFS variable. If you really wish to split the variable's contents, you may... | Lint |
| low | opengrep/bash.lang.correctness.unquoted-variable-expansion-in-command |
scripts/bower.sh:15 | Variable expansions must be double-quoted so as to prevent being split into multiple pieces according to whitespace or whichever separator is specified by the IFS variable. If you really wish to split the variable's contents, you may... | Lint |
| low | opengrep/bash.lang.correctness.unquoted-variable-expansion-in-command |
scripts/bower.sh:16 | Variable expansions must be double-quoted so as to prevent being split into multiple pieces according to whitespace or whichever separator is specified by the IFS variable. If you really wish to split the variable's contents, you may... | Lint |
| low | opengrep/bash.lang.correctness.unquoted-variable-expansion-in-command |
scripts/bower.sh:18 | Variable expansions must be double-quoted so as to prevent being split into multiple pieces according to whitespace or whichever separator is specified by the IFS variable. If you really wish to split the variable's contents, you may... | Lint |
| low | opengrep/bash.lang.correctness.unquoted-variable-expansion-in-command |
scripts/bower.sh:19 | Variable expansions must be double-quoted so as to prevent being split into multiple pieces according to whitespace or whichever separator is specified by the IFS variable. If you really wish to split the variable's contents, you may... | Lint |
| low | opengrep/bash.lang.correctness.unquoted-variable-expansion-in-command |
scripts/bower.sh:20 | Variable expansions must be double-quoted so as to prevent being split into multiple pieces according to whitespace or whichever separator is specified by the IFS variable. If you really wish to split the variable's contents, you may... | Lint |
| low | opengrep/bash.lang.correctness.unquoted-variable-expansion-in-command |
scripts/bower.sh:23 | Variable expansions must be double-quoted so as to prevent being split into multiple pieces according to whitespace or whichever separator is specified by the IFS variable. If you really wish to split the variable's contents, you may... | Lint |
| low | opengrep/bash.lang.correctness.unquoted-variable-expansion-in-command |
scripts/bower.sh:8 | Variable expansions must be double-quoted so as to prevent being split into multiple pieces according to whitespace or whichever separator is specified by the IFS variable. If you really wish to split the variable's contents, you may... | Lint |
| low | opengrep/bash.lang.correctness.unquoted-variable-expansion-in-command |
scripts/bower.sh:9 | Variable expansions must be double-quoted so as to prevent being split into multiple pieces according to whitespace or whichever separator is specified by the IFS variable. If you really wish to split the variable's contents, you may... | Lint |
| low | opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.missing-template-string-indicator |
site/src/pages/Buttons.js:259 | This looks like a JavaScript template string. Are you missing a '$' in front of '{...}'? | Lint |
| low | opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.missing-template-string-indicator |
site/src/pages/Buttons.js:259 | This looks like a JavaScript template string. Are you missing a '$' in front of '{...}'? | Lint |
| low | opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.missing-template-string-indicator |
site/src/pages/Buttons.js:270 | This looks like a JavaScript template string. Are you missing a '$' in front of '{...}'? | Lint |
| low | opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.missing-template-string-indicator |
site/src/pages/Buttons.js:270 | This looks like a JavaScript template string. Are you missing a '$' in front of '{...}'? | Lint |
| low | opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.missing-template-string-indicator |
site/src/pages/CSS.js:137 | This looks like a JavaScript template string. Are you missing a '$' in front of '{...}'? | Lint |
| low | opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.missing-template-string-indicator |
site/src/pages/CSS.js:137 | This looks like a JavaScript template string. Are you missing a '$' in front of '{...}'? | Lint |
| low | opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.missing-template-string-indicator |
site/src/pages/Forms.js:466 | This looks like a JavaScript template string. Are you missing a '$' in front of '{...}'? | Lint |
| low | opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.missing-template-string-indicator |
site/src/pages/Forms.js:466 | This looks like a JavaScript template string. Are you missing a '$' in front of '{...}'? | Lint |
| low | opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.missing-template-string-indicator |
site/src/pages/Forms.js:544 | This looks like a JavaScript template string. Are you missing a '$' in front of '{...}'? | Lint |
| low | opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.missing-template-string-indicator |
site/src/pages/Forms.js:544 | This looks like a JavaScript template string. Are you missing a '$' in front of '{...}'? | Lint |
| low | opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.missing-template-string-indicator |
site/src/pages/Forms.js:627 | This looks like a JavaScript template string. Are you missing a '$' in front of '{...}'? | Lint |
| low | opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.missing-template-string-indicator |
site/src/pages/Forms.js:627 | This looks like a JavaScript template string. Are you missing a '$' in front of '{...}'? | Lint |
| low | opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.missing-template-string-indicator |
site/src/pages/Forms.js:806 | This looks like a JavaScript template string. Are you missing a '$' in front of '{...}'? | Lint |
| low | opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.missing-template-string-indicator |
site/src/pages/Forms.js:806 | This looks like a JavaScript template string. Are you missing a '$' in front of '{...}'? | Lint |
| low | opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.missing-template-string-indicator |
site/src/pages/Home.js:88 | This looks like a JavaScript template string. Are you missing a '$' in front of '{...}'? | Lint |
| low | opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.missing-template-string-indicator |
site/src/pages/Home.js:88 | This looks like a JavaScript template string. Are you missing a '$' in front of '{...}'? | Lint |
| low | opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.missing-template-string-indicator |
site/src/pages/Misc.js:197 | This looks like a JavaScript template string. Are you missing a '$' in front of '{...}'? | Lint |
| low | opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.missing-template-string-indicator |
site/src/pages/Misc.js:197 | This looks like a JavaScript template string. Are you missing a '$' in front of '{...}'? | Lint |
| low | opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.missing-template-string-indicator |
site/src/pages/Misc.js:319 | This looks like a JavaScript template string. Are you missing a '$' in front of '{...}'? | Lint |
| low | opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.missing-template-string-indicator |
site/src/pages/Misc.js:319 | This looks like a JavaScript template string. Are you missing a '$' in front of '{...}'? | Lint |
| low | opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.missing-template-string-indicator |
site/src/pages/Misc.js:357 | This looks like a JavaScript template string. Are you missing a '$' in front of '{...}'? | Lint |
| low | opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.missing-template-string-indicator |
site/src/pages/Misc.js:357 | This looks like a JavaScript template string. Are you missing a '$' in front of '{...}'? | Lint |
| low | opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.missing-template-string-indicator |
site/src/pages/Modal.js:110 | This looks like a JavaScript template string. Are you missing a '$' in front of '{...}'? | Lint |
| low | opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.missing-template-string-indicator |
site/src/pages/Modal.js:110 | This looks like a JavaScript template string. Are you missing a '$' in front of '{...}'? | Lint |
| low | opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.missing-template-string-indicator |
site/src/pages/Modal.js:84 | This looks like a JavaScript template string. Are you missing a '$' in front of '{...}'? | Lint |
| low | opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.missing-template-string-indicator |
site/src/pages/Modal.js:84 | This looks like a JavaScript template string. Are you missing a '$' in front of '{...}'? | Lint |
| low | opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.missing-template-string-indicator |
site/src/pages/Modal.js:89 | This looks like a JavaScript template string. Are you missing a '$' in front of '{...}'? | Lint |
| low | opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.missing-template-string-indicator |
site/src/pages/Modal.js:89 | This looks like a JavaScript template string. Are you missing a '$' in front of '{...}'? | Lint |
Tools and coverage
Every analyzer that ran on this commit. A failed or skipped tool is a coverage gap: its share of the score is left out and the coverage figure drops.
| Analyzer | Pillar | Status | Version | Findings | Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI tool configuration | AI provenance | ok | signatures-v1 | 0 | |
| Explicit AI attribution | AI provenance | ok | signatures-v1 | 0 | |
| Release velocity | AI provenance | ok | prov-4 | 0 | |
| Coding style | AI provenance | ok | — | 0 | |
| Commit velocity | AI provenance | ok | prov-4 | 0 | |
| Complexity (lizard) | Code quality | ok | lizard 1.25.1 | 0 | |
| Documentation | Code quality | ok | — | 0 | |
| Duplication (jscpd) | Code quality | ok | repotrust-dup-w6 | 0 | |
| Lint | Code quality | ok | opengrep 1.33.1; rules f1d2b562b414 | 40 | |
| Tests and CI | Code quality | ok | — | 0 | |
| Type safety | Code quality | skipped | — | 0 | |
| CI workflows (zizmor) | Security | skipped | — | 0 | |
| Dependencies (osv-scanner) | Security | skipped | — | 0 | |
| Release downloads | Security | ok | — | 0 | |
| Security posture | Security | ok | — | 0 | |
| Package registries | Security | ok | — | 0 | |
| Static analysis (opengrep) | Security | ok | opengrep 1.33.1; rules f1d2b562b414 | 3 | |
| OpenSSF Scorecard | Security | ok | scorecard v5.6.0 | 0 | |
| Secrets (gitleaks) | Security | ok | gitleaks 8.30.1 | 0 |
Score history
Scores from different scoring versions aren't directly comparable.
| Scored | Commit | Scoring | AI provenance | Quality | Security |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-11-14 | 43d25fdb2809 | prov-5+qual-2+sec-2 | 0% | 38 | 72 |
| 2026-11-14 | 43d25fdb2809 | prov-4+qual-2+sec-2 | 0% | 38 | 72 |
Full text report
- Repository: https://github.com/elementalui/elemental
- Commit:
43d25fdb280957ec382c88404b1a81c3101825ec - Generated: 2026-11-14T14:52:04+00:00
- Scorer 0.1.0, scoring prov-5+qual-2+sec-2, report schema v2
Scores
| Pillar | Score | Signal | Confidence | Coverage |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI provenance (estimated AI-generated share) | 0 | none-detected | 65% | 100% |
| Code quality | 38 | poor | 90% | 100% |
| Security | 72 | adequate | 85% | 100% |
AI provenance
No AI attribution or AI-consistent velocity signals detected.
- Explicitly attributed share (lower bound): 0.0%
- Unattributed share in AI-consistent velocity bursts: 0.0%
- Estimated AI-generated share: 0.0%
| Month | Lines added | Attributed to AI |
|---|---|---|
| 2016-02 | 17 | 0% |
| 2016-03 | 26 | 0% |
| 2016-05 | 48 | 0% |
| 2016-07 | 44 | 0% |
| 2016-08 | 111 | 0% |
| 2016-09 | 140 | 0% |
| 2016-11 | 10 | 0% |
| 2017-05 | 25 | 0% |
| 2017-06 | 1 | 0% |
| 2017-09 | 217 | 0% |
| 2017-10 | 627 | 0% |
| 2017-11 | 7 | 0% |
AI provenance describes how code was produced; it is not a quality judgment. Unless attribution is explicit, these are signals consistent with AI generation, not proof. Squash/rebase workflows, imported code, and rewritten history reduce accuracy.
Code quality
Code quality is poor: test-to-source ratio 0.02, no CI test run detected; 39% of function code in complex or long functions; 21% duplicated lines. Weakest area: process.
| Area | Score |
|---|---|
| Complexity (lizard) | 31 |
| Duplication | 28 |
| Code smells (Opengrep) | 64 |
| Tests and CI | 21 |
| Documentation | 85 |
| Type safety | n/a |
| Process (Scorecard review/maintenance) | 20 |
- Functions: 228; mean complexity 2.0, 90th percentile 4; 2 complex and 4 long functions
- Duplicated lines: 21.4% of 4,831 compared
- Tests: 101 test lines for 5,990 source lines (ratio 0.02); CI test commands: none detected; 1% of recent source commits also change tests
- Docs missing or thin: contributing
Most complex functions:
- render in src/components/Col.js: complexity 18, 35 lines
- render in src/components/ResponsiveText.js: complexity 16, 25 lines
- render in site/src/pages/Modal.js: complexity 5, 185 lines
- render in site/src/pages/Forms.js: complexity 2, 723 lines
- render in site/src/pages/Grid.js: complexity 1, 210 lines
Security
Security posture is adequate: no high-impact findings. Weakest area: posture.
| Area | Score |
|---|---|
| Secrets (gitleaks, tree + history) | 100 |
| Static analysis (Opengrep) | 96 |
| Vulnerable dependencies (OSV) | n/a |
| CI workflows (zizmor) | n/a |
| Posture (policy, updates, signing, lockfiles) | 0 |
| OpenSSF Scorecard | 25 |
- Posture checks passed: none; missing: security policy, dependency updates, signed commits, lockfiles
- OpenSSF Scorecard aggregate: 2.6/10 (published 2026-10-19)
Top findings
| Severity | Finding | Location |
|---|---|---|
| medium | opengrep/javascript.lang.security.html-in-template-string: This template literal looks like HTML and has interpolated variables. These variables are not HTML-encoded by default. If the variables contain HTML tags, these may be interpreted by the browser, resulting in cross-site scripting (XSS). [confidence low] |
site/src/pages/Buttons.js:87 |
| medium | opengrep/javascript.lang.security.html-in-template-string: This template literal looks like HTML and has interpolated variables. These variables are not HTML-encoded by default. If the variables contain HTML tags, these may be interpreted by the browser, resulting in cross-site scripting (XSS). [confidence low] |
site/src/pages/Glyphs.js:39 |
| medium | opengrep/javascript.lang.security.audit.detect-redos: Detected the use of a regular expression ^(([^<>()[\]\\.,;:\s@"]+(\.[^<>()[\]\\.,;:\s@"]+)*)|(".+"))@((\[[0-9]{1,3}\.[0-9]{1,3}\.[0-9]{1,3}\.[0-9]{1,3}])|(([a-zA-Z\-0-9]+\.)+[a-zA-Z]{2,}))$ which appears to be vulnerable to a Regular expression Denial-of-Service (ReDoS). For this reason, it is rec [confidence low] |
src/components/EmailInputGroup.js:9 |
Static signals only: the scorer never runs the project's code. Secret findings are pattern matches that were not verified, and secret values are never stored.
Repository profile
- Source lines: 5,990; test lines: 101
| Language | Lines |
|---|---|
| JavaScript | 6,066 |
| Shell | 25 |